Abstract
Elevation in incidences of cow milk protein allergies warrants the need to investigate the suitability of non-bovine milk alternatives for human consumption. Donkey milk has emerged as a potential alternative attributed to its benefits to human health. Evidently, it is a great option for infants as it closely resembles human milk. Researchers have also investigated its suitability in producing numerous dairy products. This review discusses the various nutri-functional aspects of donkey milk, its applications and challenges in the manufacturing of infant formula, yogurt, cheese, ice cream, kefir, and fermented milk. Research updates on processing techniques (thermal and non-thermal) for donkey milk preservation are also delineated. Despite abundant nutrients and desirable functional properties, the growth of the donkey milk industry is not significant. This is due to the lower yield, scattered population, and lack of regulatory standards for both products and processing. Recommendation on research gaps and obstacles in its commercialization are also addressed.
Graphical abstract
Keywords: Donkey Milk, Non-bovine alternatives, Functional foods, Dairy products, Sustainability , Infant nutrition
Introduction
Milk is a diverse and nutrient source of fat, sugar (carbs.), protein, vitamins, minerals, and enzymes (Munir et al. 2019). Milk from other species has always been used whenever breastfeeding is not possible, among which cow milk has gained significant attention (Martin et al. 2016). However, a rise in the incidences of cow milk’s protein allergy (CMPA) (due to casein, β lactoglobulin, and α lactalbumin) drove the researchers to investigate non-bovine milk as a potential alternative (Lajnaf et al. 2023). As per reports, the production of non-bovine milks has risen by 165% between 1983 and 2013 against the 41% increase in cow milk (Ranadheera et al. 2018).
Interest in donkey milk (DM) is arising because of its similar composition and properties to human milk (Nayak et al. 2020). It is gaining popularity due to its potential to fulfill the supplemental needs of infants, neonates, and elderly people (Aspri et al. 2017a). Its higher lactose content can assist in producing soft curd inside the stomach, hence convenient to digest. It can also be given to infants suffering from cow milk enterocolitis syndrome (Mori et al. 2017). As per Nayak et al. (2022), DM was used by the French government to feed orphan infants in the nineteenth century. In addition to its positive impact on infants, DM has demonstrated beneficial effects in various other areas. These include promoting osteogenesis, assisting in the treatment of patients with atherosclerosis, coronary disease, premature aging, and contributing to hypocholesterolemic diets (Baloš et al. 2023).
Lajnaf et al. (2023) said that DM is known for its therapeutic applications since ancient times. In several countries like Serbia, it has traditionally been employed as a natural remedy for treating asthma and bronchitis. It has significantly higher antimicrobial properties, contributed by its lactoferrin, immunoglobulin, lactoperoxidase, and lysozyme content. Literature has also reported its immunomodulation effectiveness against various bacteria, fungi, viruses, and diseases, including stress, tumors, staphylococcosis, listeriosis, heart diseases, and viral infections (Martini et al. 2021). Higher whey content and lower casein to whey protein ratio define its hypoallergenic properties and consumption suitability for people suffering from CMPA. Despite the higher lactose content in donkey milk, its fermented products have been found suitable for lactose intolerant population, attributed to their easy digestibility (Carminati and Tidona 2017). As per Nayak et al. (2022) it is a good source of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which assist in skin care.
The market for DM has experienced a significant growth, with a value of 23.2 million USD in 2021. It is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 9.9% from 2022 to 2028. The rise might be due to the acceptance of DM products in economies like the U.K. and Germany. Additionally, there is a rising awareness of skincare and nutritional benefits associated with DM products. These factors are significant contributors to future market growth. Furthermore, during COVID-19, DM utilization increased due to its perceived advantages, such as its high vitamin content and potential immune-boosting properties (Consumer, F&B, 2023).
The donkey (Equus africanus asinus) belongs to the Equidae family. It has always been a supportive asset for the poor communities of the world (Norris et al. 2021). The worldwide donkey population was 50 million in 2019. They are scattered in different regions of the world, including South America, Africa, Southern Europe, and Asia, and there was a 19% rise in their population between 1997 and 2021 (Norris et al. 2021). DM is used in the dairy and cosmetics sector (D’Alessandro et al. 2018, 2019; Kriel et al. 2017). It is white, less viscous, and has a pleasant aroma and a slightly sweet taste (Nayak et al. 2022). Consumption and utilization of DM can assist in fulfilling the dietary needs of highly populated as well as low-economy countries. In addition to this, it can assist the local farmers and small-scale milk production units. Researchers have also reported the manufacturing of numerous other products from DM, including yogurt, cheese, and fermented drinks like kefir (Akal et al. 2022; Aroua et al. 2023; Faccia et al. 2019; Guénard-Lampron et al. 2020; Salgado et al. 2021). It has natural lactobacilli probiotic bacteria, which makes it suitable for fermented products (Salgado et al. 2021). The world’s costliest cheese (pule cheese) is made from DM (Carneiro et al. 2018). Researchers have explored numerous processing techniques such as pasteurization, drying, UV-C, High Pressure Processing (HPP) to ensure the safety of DM (Dambrosio et al. 2023; Matera et al. 2022; Papademas et al. 2020; Tedeschi et al. 2023; Vincenzetti et al. 2018). Despite the benefits of consuming DM, its industrialization is not up to a remarkable extent. It is due to the lack of awareness among the population which conveniently gets cow milk or plant-based milk. In addition to that donkey milk is not allowed to use in Islamic religion, which is 25% of the world population. Another possible reason is the lack of regulatory standards for products as well as processing. This review delves into the findings of the nutri-functional properties, applications, and challenges in the manufacturing of various donkey milk products. Updates on the investigation of various processing techniques for the preservation of DM are also addressed alongside the hurdles in the growth of the DM industry and the suitable recommendations for future research.
Nutri-functional properties of DM
An overview of various components and their approximate concentrations in donkey, human, cow, goat, and camel milk is presented in Table 1. The composition of DM sets it apart from other milk varieties like cow’s milk or goat’s milk, giving it a distinctive profile. It has been found that DM has a similar composition of protein (casein and whey) and sugar (lactose) as human milk but significantly differs from cow, goat, and camel milk (Baloš et al. 2023). However, the most notable distinction between DM and human milk is the low-fat content in DM. Regarding the casein-to-whey protein ratio (70.3:100), DM falls between cow and human milk. It has lower fat and slightly higher lactose content than cow’s milk. It is a good source of vitamins (A, B2, and C), major (calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, and sodium) and trace (iron, zinc, and copper) minerals (Massouras et al. 2017).
Table 1.
Nutritional composition with macro and micronutrients milk of donkey and other species (percent composition g/100 g)
| Component | Donkey milk | Human milk | Cow milk | Goat milk | Camel milk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat | 1.21 | 3.38 | 3.46 | 4.62 | 1.80 |
| Lactose | 6.23 | 6.69 | 4.71 | 4.47 | 2.91 |
| Ash | 0.43 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.85 |
| Energy (KJ/Kg) | 1939.40 | 2855.60 | 2983.00 | 3399.50 | 2745.80 |
| Total protein | 1.74 | 1.64 | 3.43 | 3.41 | 1.80 |
| Total casein | 0.64–1.03 | 0.32–0.42 | 2.46–2.80 | – | – |
| Total whey protein | 0.49–0.80 | 0.68–0.83 | 0.55–0.70 | – | – |
| pH | 7.0–7.2 | 7.0–7.5 | 6.6–6.8 | ||
| Water | 90.39 | 87.57 | 87.62 | 86.77 | 90.60 |
DM contains various immunological factors such as lysozyme, lactoferrin, omega-3 fatty acids, bioactive peptides and immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, and IgM), (Papademas et al. 2021). These factors contributed toward the broad range of functional properties including antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antioxidative, antiallergic, anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, antiparasitic, and anti-tumor activities (Baloš et al. 2023). The various findings about functional properties are summarized in Table 2. DM is considered as hypoallergenic due to its unique protein profile, potentially reducing the risk of allergic reactions in infants (Aspri et al. 2017a). The low allergenicity and better digestibility of DM can be ascribed primarily to its low casein (particularly αs1-casein and k-casein) and high whey protein content (Baloš et al. 2023; Souroullas et al. 2018; Vinţe and Coroian 2022). Immunochemical investigations also support the hypoallergenic nature of DM’s as IgE from patients with cow’s milk allergies weakly recognizes the DM caseins (Souroullas et al. 2018). Therefore, donkey milk can be a suitable substitute for the population suffering from CMPA. Further, the presence of lysozyme variants (~ 4000 mg/L) and a higher concentration of lactoferrin (~ 80 mg/L) in DM makes it superior in antimicrobial activity as compared to other milk-producing species (Altomonte et al. 2019; Aspri et al. 2017b, c; Hassan et al. 2022). Lysozyme inhibits bacterial growth by hydrolyzing the polysaccharides of bacterial cell walls (Hassan et al. 2022; Martini et al. 2019). Additionally, it stimulates the production of nitric oxide, which helps with blood circulation and lowers blood pressure (Hassan et al. 2022). According to Martini et al. (2021) non-bovine milks, including DM, are a rich source of lactoferrin (a protective protein) that arrests pathogenic growth and invasion by disrupting their cell walls. DM is also reported to have proteins which on hydrolysis produce antimicrobial bioactive peptides (Aspri et al. 2017b). This is attributed for the high antimicrobial activity of fermented DM (Aspri et al. 2018). Altomonte et al. (2019) reported the antifungal properties of DM. The studies showed sensitivity of Microsporumcanis, Microsporumgypsum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes towards four different pasteurized DM samples conforming to its antidermatophytic effect.
Table 2.
Various studies summarizing the functional properties of donkey milk
| Functional property | Results stated by study | References |
|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial properties | Lysozyme inhibits the growth of LAB, food spoilage bacteria, and pathogens (Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus faecium, and Lactobacillus curvatus). | Aspri et al (2017c); Hassan et al. (2022) |
| Antifungal | Disintegration or increased influx rate of H + across the plasma membrane of fungi due to presence of fatty acids i.e., capric and myristoleic acids etc. | Altomonte et al. (2019); Lajnaf et al. (2023) |
| Antioxidative and Hypoglycemic | Enhanced superoxide dismutase activity due to presence of bioactive peptides in DM, causes the breakdown of superoxide radical into H2O2 and O2, and this is the cause of anti-diabetic effect of DM. | Martini et al. (2021) |
| Antiallergic | Rapid degradability and complete digestibility of low casein content is responsible for low allergenicity of DM. | Aspri et al. (2017b); Martini et al. (2021) |
| Anti-inflammatory | Improved functionality of paneth’s cells by restoration of lysozyme and α-defensin, and a decrease in the dysbiosis connected with ileitis are responsible reasons for anti-inflammation properties of DM. | Hassan et al. (2022); Yvon et al. (2018) |
| Immunomodulating | DM produces cytokines (protein controls the inflammatory and immune response to infections) like interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6, and IL-2 etc., which improves innate immunity. As the lysozyme concentration of DM is similar to human milk, and more than cow milk, and lysozyme have whey protein fractions, which contribute to the immunomodulating effects of DM. | Martini et al. (2021) |
DM and products also demonstrate activities against reactive oxygen species, have antioxidative properties, improve the immune system, and preserve gut flora’s balance (Li et al. 2022). High levels of bioactive peptides, high vitamin C, αs1 casein, β- casein, and lactoperoxidase contribute to DM’s antioxidant properties. At the same time, anti-inflammatory properties are due to the presence of high levels of bioactive peptides, lactoferrin, lysozyme, and omega-3 fatty acids. Yvon et al. (2018) demonstrated the anti-inflammatory characteristics of DM, where the concentration of antibacterial peptides (generated by Paneth cells) revived in mice suffering from Crohn’s disease. Similarly, a study conducted by Jiang et al. (2018) supported DM’s anti-inflammatory properties by administering DM lysozyme (DML) in mice suffering from dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) induced inflammation. This study demonstrated that DML not only assisted in reducing inflammation but also improved inflammatory bowel disease and positively impacted the gut microbiota. Studies by Li et al. (2020) have demonstrated the DM helps in lowering blood glucose levels by improving insulin resistance, increasing the body’s ability to eliminate free radicals, and increasing antioxidant levels. Lower blood sugar and improved defense against insulin proved the hypoglycemic effect of DM hence it can be exploited for the treatment of type-2 diabetes.
Kocic et al. (2020) has reported that DM can decrease the impact of aging. However, this effect is more pronounced by applying DM or DM’s products directly on the body as it promotes deeper penetration of phospholipids and proteins inside the skin and keeps the skin’s pH in the acidic range, preventing the appearance of inflammation and age-related changes to the skin. But there is no clear and detailed evidence of the antiaging effect associated with the consumption of DM and its phenomena.
Applications of DM
Applications of DM involve its transformation into infant formula, cheese, ice cream and fermented products (yoghurt, kefir). It was observed that DM products have probiotic effects, and their consumption leads to favorable health traits (Salgado et al. 2021). The potential use of DM in different products is summarized in Table 3 and discussed below in detail.
Table 3.
Attributes of different dairy products manufactured from donkey milk
| Product | Attributes | References |
|---|---|---|
| Infant formula |
Suitable for infants with cow milk protein allergy. Provide similar attributes to human milk Abundant in amino acids, fatty acids, and taurine. Abundant growth hormones Reduce the risk of allergic reactions Easily digestible as compared to cow milk infant formula. Desirable protein to calcium ratio |
Aspri et al. (2017b); Li et al. (2018) |
| Yogurt |
Higher lactic acid bacteria compared to cow milk yogurts. Fibers were added to make up the viscosity, but it caused significant effect on sensory properties. Higher shelf life as compared to cow milk yogurt attributed to the presence of lactoferrin and lysozyme. |
Akal et al. (2022); Salgado et al. (2021) |
| Fermented milk |
Improved fatty acid profile. Lower saturated fatty acid. Rich in mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Shelf life of 21 days (refrigerated storage) |
Cavalcanti et al. (2021) |
| Kefir |
Superior microbiological quality compared to cow milk kefir. Higher antioxidant activity |
Aroua et al. (2023) |
| Cheese |
Lower yield. Gamy aroma and sweet flavor. Crumbly and soluble texture resembling feta cheese. |
Faccia et al. (2018, 2019) |
| Ice cream |
Two probiotics cultures were added (Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Lactobacillus plantarum. The population of both strains stayed at 9-log cfu/mL up to the storage of 4 months Lower fat. Storage affected the vitamin C content. |
Tidona et al. (2017) |
Infant nutrition and formula
Human milk is the most ideal source of nutrition and is crucial in promoting overall health and well-being throughout infancy, childhood, and adulthood while supporting optimal growth and development in children (World Health Organization 2022). In addition to its nutrient composition, human milk comprises a diverse range of bioactive compounds that actively contribute to the shaping and modulation of the immune system, gut health, and brain development. Commercial infant formula, derived from cow’s milk that mimics human milk closely are the suitable alternatives for human milk. Its purpose is to fulfill the nutritional requirements of preterm infants and ensure nutrition for infants in case of breast milk unavailability (Perrella et al. 2021). The nutritional needs of infants are specific and complex, and formulas are carefully formulated to meet those requirements. To utilize raw animal milk as a substitute for formula, it is crucial to comprehend the variations in oligosaccharides, lactose, and other nutritional content between human milk and animal milk. In a study by Wang et al. (2020), Chinese human milk’s oligosaccharide and lactose content was compared to animal milk sources such as bovine, yak, goat, and donkey. The findings revealed that DM’s lactose content was similar to human milk. However, the oligosaccharide profile varied regarding the type and quantity present in human and donkey milk. In addition to this, previous studies have reported that the digestibility of DM was found to be greater than that of cow’s milk and comparable to that of human milk (Martini et al. 2021). The α-lactalbumin component of human breast milk forms a complex with oleic acid known as HAMLET (Human Alpha-lactalbumin Made Lethal to Tumor Cells). This complex has demonstrated the ability to induce apoptosis selectively in tumor cells, making it a potential therapeutic agent against various types of tumors (Lerksuthirat et al. 2023).
Moreover, α-lactalbumin is known to inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and phospholipase A2 activities, resulting in enhanced anti-inflammatory attributes. In contrast, β-lactoglobulin, a major whey protein in cow milk and a common allergen in children, is absent in human milk. Both DM and human milk exhibit immune effects and can enhance the immune response in humans. Though, powdered infant formulas incorporating DM are regarded as promising alternatives to human milk for infants and newborn. However, there are certain challenges and gaps that need to be addressed. It is claimed to have potential antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties, although the extent of these effects in human infants needs to be better understood. Moreover, it has been discovered that DM contains growth factors and hormones, including human-like leptin, ghrelin, insulin-like growth factor 1, and triiodothyronine T3. These bioactive molecules directly impact metabolism, body composition, and the regulation of food intake (Brumini et al. 2013). Yet, infant formulas undergo extensive processing to enhance their digestibility and minimize potential digestive issues. However, extensive research is needed to establish its hypoallergenic properties and compare them to existing hypoallergenic formulas available on the market.
Yogurt
DM yogurt represents a promising method for incorporating DM into human diets due to its widespread popularity as a dairy derivative. Akal et al. (2022) studied the antimicrobial properties of lysozyme and lactoferrin extracted from DM in yogurt. The outcomes of this study proved that lactoferrin and lysozyme from DM can assist in increasing the shelf life of yogurt by inhibiting undesirable microbial growth without affecting the product’s sensory attributes.
DM’s limited solid constituents (proteins and fats) pose challenges to attain optimal yield, consistency, and viscosity in the yogurt-making process. As viscosity perception plays a pivotal role in determining yogurts’ quality and sensory approval, addressing this aspect becomes critical for consumer acceptance (Guénard-Lampron et al. 2020). Salgado et al. (2021) studied the influence of various fibers (inulin, apple fruit, and passion fruit) on the viscosity and sensory acceptance of DM yogurt compared to cow milk yogurt. Five yogurt formulations were developed: DM control, with inulin, with apple fiber, with passion fruit fiber, and cow milk control. The study conducted comprehensive analyses of the physio-chemical and microbiological components of the yogurts. Notably, DM-based yogurts exhibited significantly higher counts of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) than cow milk yogurt. The pH and color of the yogurts were found to be significantly influenced by both the type of milk and the added fiber. The passion fruit fiber DM yogurt displayed the most favorable apparent viscosity (824.7 mPa s). Sensory evaluation results (specifically focused on the attributes of DM control, with passion fruit fiber, and cow milk control) revealed that despite the higher viscosity, the addition of passion fruit fiber resulted in a decline in overall acceptance. Therefore, while certain fibers may positively impact the apparent viscosity of DM yogurt, sensory acceptance remains crucial in determining the practical viability of such formulations.
Fermented milk
The dairy industry produces numerous types of fermented milk with distinct physicochemical features since fermented milk is the most commercialized dairy product due to its suitable nutritional value (Miao et al. 2020). The fermentative process can improve sensory and functional properties of DM; therefore, the formulation of fermented DM products could be an interesting approach (Aspri et al. 2018).
The nutritional value and physicochemical characteristics of fresh DM and its fermented counterpart were studied by Cavalcanti et al. (2021). Additionally, the influence of refrigerated storage (4 °C, 21 days) on the characteristics of fermented DM was examined. Comparative analyses revealed that fermented milk exhibited higher acidity and reduced levels of lactose, minerals (calcium, phosphorous, magnesium, sodium, and zinc), and amino acids (particularly essential ones), compared to fresh milk. Conversely, it displayed an improved fatty acid profile, with lower saturated fatty acid content and higher monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acid content than fresh milk. During the 21-days refrigerated storage period, fermented milk exhibited a decline in lactose content, while the amino acid profile showed improvement and the mineral content remained relatively stable. The storage period also negatively impacted the fatty acid profile of the fermented milk. Overall, this study confirms the significant nutritional value of both DM and fermented DM. Moreover, it suggests that fermented milk can be stored and refrigerated for up to 21 days while retaining its essential nutritional attributes.
Kefir
Kefir is a type of fermented milk drink that originated in either Mongolia or the Caucasus Mountains of Russia (Ganatsios et al. 2021). It has a unique combination of healthy bacteria including yeasts (Saccharomyces, Torula, Kluyveromyces, and Candida spp.), LAB (Streptococcus, Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, and Lactococcus), and Acetobacter have (Vashisht et al. 2023). Kefiran, a water-soluble branched glucogalactan polysaccharide matrix produced by by Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens, may strengthen consumers’ immune systems and promote resistance to pathogenic infections (Hamida et al. 2021). Kefir can be produced by inoculating milk with tiny clusters of certain microbe combinations contained in a particular polysaccharide matrix known as kefir grains. Fermentation can last up to 24 h (Vashisht et al. 2023). Aroua et al. (2023) assessed the traits of DM and cow milk kefir during storage for 28 days at 4 °C. During fermentation, the pH of cow’s milk decreased significantly from 6.75 ± 0.045 to 4.22 ± 0.062, while DM’s decreased from 7.01 ± 0.011 to 4.28 ± 0.030. During storage acidity values increased from 63 ± 2.08 to 170 ± 2.80 °D for cow milk and from 92 ± 1.0 to 163 ± 1.30 °D for DM kefir. Total solids displayed notable variation while protein content remained stable. Although lactose levels decreased significantly over time, fat content remained unchanged in kefirs stored at 4 °C. Microbiologically, DM kefir exhibited significant differences compared to cow milk kefir, consistently displaying lower average bacterial counts, suggesting superior microbiological quality than cow’s milk kefir samples. The samples also showed compelling antioxidant activity, as measured by the DPPH and ABTS assays, which improved during storage. The bacterium Aeromonas hydrophila showed the highest sensitivity to the action of kefir samples. Sensory tests indicated that participants preferred freshly prepared kefirs over those stored for 28 days at 4 °C. Owing to its distinct bioactive activities and favorable microbiological properties, DM is a promising alternative as a source material for kefir fermentation.
Cheese
Low casein concentration, large size of casein micelle, and poor colloidal stability are significant technical barriers to producing cheese out of DM (Faccia et al. 2019). κ- Casein, the protein that is responsible for gelation in cheese, is found to be absent or present in very scarce amounts (Cosenza et al. 2019; Luo et al. 2019). Knowing the fact that there are numerous technical challenges encountered during the preparation of cheese using DM milk as base material, attempts have been made to optimize the process parameters to produce fresh DM cheese with desired organoleptic characteristics. In contrast to cheese made from cow’s milk, DM cheese has very peculiar sensory qualities. The aroma is referred to as “gamy”, which comes from the DM’s typical animal fragrance, crumbly and soluble texture like fresh feta cheese, and the flavor is noticeably sweet (Faccia et al. 2018, 2019).
Literature has reported the use of different coagulants for the preparation of fresh DM cheese. Faccia et al. (2018) used calf rennet and reported that DM was not able to coagulate entirely without the aid of calcium chloride and lowering the pH with the addition of starter culture. The yield obtained was only 5.9%. Faccia et al. (2019) found that the microbial rennet and the starter culture can also be used to prepare fresh cheese from DM for around 42 min until molding. There was an increase in the yield of cheese to 7.21%. However, no supporting reason for the increased yield was given in the studies. The inclusion of microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) in a similar process as adopted by Faccia et al. (2019) for preparing DM cheese simultaneously with rennet addition resulted in the lowest coagulation time and highest curd viscosity due to intermolecular cross-linking of micellar caseins mediated by MTGase (D’Alessandro et al. 2019).
On the contrary, Giuseppe (2015) suggested that only camel chymosin can coagulate the DM; it took hours to complete the coagulation process. The PAGE analysis of DM cheese suggested that β-casein was the most prevalent fraction of protein followed by α-casein; the bands of para κ- Casein were very light. Similar results were reported by Cosenza et al. (2019) and Luo et al. (2019).
Ice-cream
The only study on ice cream prepared from DM was conducted by Tidona et al. (2017). Ice cream with strawberry flavor made from DM was combined with two LAB strains (B. adolesentis and L. plantarum) that exhibited probiotic characteristics. The fat and overrun of the product were 1.2 and 24.7%, respectively. The fat content was lower in DM ice cream as compared to the ice cream made from cow milk. The vitamin C level decreased after four months of –20 °C storage. However, the ice cream’s total phenol content and antioxidant capacity remained unaltered. The number of viable probiotic bacteria was greater than 9-log CFU/g for the duration of storage.
Processing updates
Both thermal and non-thermal processing technologies, as well as drying, have been explored for the processing of DM. For the batch pasteurization treatment, similar processing parameters as for mild pasteurization of human milk (62.5–65 °C for 30 min) were used in the literature (Martini et al. 2018; Papademas et al. 2020; Tedeschi et al. 2023;) where decline in nutritive components like vitamin D3, ACE inhibitory activity, bioactivity and elevated protein lyophilization have been reported. However, continuous HTST treatments (75, 85, and 92 °C for 12, 6 and 3 s, respectively) had better nutrient retention where 20–60 and 2–22% decline in lysozyme and β-lactoglobulin was observed, respectively (Matera et al. 2022). Among drying techniques spray and freeze drying were explored where spray dried powders had major impact on the lysozyme activity (58% residual activity) and β-lactoglobulin content (14% reduction), and volatile composition where inlet air temperature plays major role (Di-Renzo et al. 2013; Vincenzetti et al. 2018; Nayak et al. 2022). Whereas freeze dried powders had better nutrition retention and functional properties than spray dried (Di-Renzo et al. 2013; Vincenzetti et al. 2018). However, cost evaluation needs to be conducted for a better comparison.
Researchers have also explored non-thermal technologies for the processing of DM, aiming to retain its natural composition. Papademas et al. (2020) and Tedeschi et al. (2023) reported the use of Sure Pure UV system for the UV processing of DM where significant microbial reduction of pathogenic and spoilage organisms was observed with similar nutritive composition as of raw samples. High Pressure Processed DM also had a comparable shelf life to the thermally processed samples but with lesser effect on the quality parameters (lysozyme preservation). Hence these techniques proved to have better product than thermally treated ones, but they need advance scale up strategies and regulatory approvals to be applied at commercialized level. Further all these treatments used in these studies including thermal were conducted at different processing conditions which makes the comparison difficult. This warrants the need of standard parameters for each processing technique.
Conclusion
Donkey milk has proved to be a potential alternative to bovine milk. It is suitable for the population suffering from cow milk protein allergy. Literature has reported that it has antiallergic, antimicrobial, antifungal, hypoglycemic, antioxidative, and immunomodulating properties, which are beneficial to human health. Other than that, its fermented products were found to be suitable for lactose intolerant population. Its similar composition to human milk provided the opportunity to feed infants where breastfeeding is unavailable. Infant formula made from donkey milk had better properties than cow milk formula but there is a need for rigorous research to solidify its health claims. Authors have also reported the manufacturing of cheese, yogurt, kefir, fermented milk, and ice cream using donkey milk with acceptable sensorial and nutritional attributes. However, lower yield and viscosity (due to lower total solids) and lower coagulation rate (due to the absence of k-casein) are the major challenges for these products. Numerous processing techniques have been explored for its preservation where non-thermal techniques like UV-C and High-Pressure Processing had better nutrient retention than the thermal techniques. However, there is a need for regulations and standard processing parameters in both cases to evaluate and compare their efficiency and feasibility. Overall, there is a tremendous increase in the donkey milk market. However, industrialization is still facing numerous challenges. Lower yield, scattered population and the lack of regulations are the major issues. There is a need for further extensive research into the improvements in donkey milk production, marketing strategies and better manufacturing of products from it.
Authors contribution
MPS: Writing–original draft, PV: conceptualization, resources, writing–original draft, writing-review and editing, visualization, supervision, LS: writing–original draft, NA: writing–original draft, visualization, SS: writing–original draft, visualization, CM: writing–original draft, TPS: conceptualization, resources, writing original draft, writing–review and editing, visualization, supervision, SS: writing original draft, SS: writing original draft, APRC: writing original draft.
Funding
No fundings has been received.
Data availability
No such data is available for this study.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest from any author.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Pranav Vashisht, Email: pvashishtpandit@gmail.com.
Tejinder Pal Singh, Email: 88tejindersingh@gmail.com.
References
- Akal HC, Ozturkoglu-Budak S, Bereli N, Cimen D, Akgonullu S (2022) Effect of donkey milk lactoferrin and lysozyme on yoghurt properties. Mljekarstvo: časopis za unaprjeđenje proizvodnje i prerade mlijeka 72(2):77–87. 10.15567/mljekarstvo.2022.0202 10.15567/mljekarstvo.2022.0202 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Altomonte I, Nardoni S, Mancianti F, Perrucci S, Rosario L, Salari F, Martini M (2019) Preliminary results on antifungal activity of donkey milk. Large Anim Rev 25(5):179–181 [Google Scholar]
- Aroua M, Ben Haj Koubaier H, Bouacida S, Ben Saïd S, Mahouachi M, Salimei E (2023) Chemical, physicochemical, microbiological, bioactive, and sensory characteristics of cow and donkey milk Kefir during storage. Beverages 9(1):2. 10.3390/beverages9010002 10.3390/beverages9010002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aspri M, Bozoudi D, Tsaltas D, Hill C, Papademas P (2017a) Raw donkey milk as a source of Enterococcus diversity: Assessment of their technological properties and safety characteristics. Food Control 73:81–90. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.022 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aspri M, Economou N, Papademas P (2017b) Donkey milk: an overview on functionality, technology, and future prospects. Food Rev Int 33(3):316–333. 10.1080/87559129.2016.1175014 10.1080/87559129.2016.1175014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aspri M, O’Connor PM, Field D, Cotter PD, Ross P, Hill C, Papademas P (2017c) Application of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium isolated from donkey milk, in the bio-control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh whey cheese. Int Dairy J 73:1–9. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.04.008 10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.04.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aspri M, Leni G, Galaverna G, Papademas P (2018) Bioactive properties of fermented donkey milk, before and after in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem 268:476–484. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.119 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baloš MŽ, Pelić DL, Jakšić S, Lazić S (2023) Donkey milk: an overview of its chemical composition and main nutritional properties or human health benefit properties. J Equine Vet Sci 121:104225. 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104225 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brumini D, Furlund CB, Comi I, Devold TG, Marletta D, Vegarud GE, Jonassen CM (2013) Antiviral activity of donkey milk protein fractions on echovirus type 5. Int Dairy J 28(2):109–111. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.08.010 10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.08.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Carminati D, Tidona F (2017) Nutritional value and potential health benefits of donkey milk. Nutrients in dairy and their implications on health and disease. Academic Press, pp 407–414 [Google Scholar]
- Carneiro GF, Lucena JEC, de Oliveira Barros L (2018) The current situation and trend of the donkey industry in South America. J Equine Vet Sci 65:106–110. 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.03.007 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.03.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cavalcanti NSH, Pimentel TC, Magnani M, Pacheco MTB, Alves SP, Bessa RJB, da Silva Sant’ana AM, do Egypto RDCR (2021) Donkey milk and fermented donkey milk: are there differences in the nutritional value and physicochemical characteristics? Lwt 144:111239. 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111239 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111239 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Consumer F&B (2023) Donkey milk market size, share & trends analysis report by form (liquid, powder), by application (food & beverages, cosmetics & personal care), by region, and segment forecasts, 2022-2028 (donkey milk market size & share report, 2022-2028 (grandviewresearch.com)
- Cosenza G, Mauriello R, Garro G, Auzino B, Iannaccone M, Costanzo A, Chianese L, Pauciullo A (2019) Casein composition and differential translational efficiency of casein transcripts in donkey’s milk. J Dairy Res 86(2):201–207 10.1017/S0022029919000256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D’Alessandro AG, Martemucci G, Loizzo P, Faccia M (2018) Donkey cheese production using pure milk or in mixture with goat or cow milk: preliminary results. Italian 18:s1 [Google Scholar]
- D’Alessandro A, Martemucci G, Loizzo P, Faccia M (2019) Production of cheese from donkey milk as influenced by addition of transglutaminase. J Dairy Sci 102(12):10867–10876. 10.3168/jds.2019-16615 10.3168/jds.2019-16615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dambrosio A, Capuozzo F, De Palo P, Mottola A, Storelli MM, De Rosa M, Matrella R, Quaglia NC (2023) Behaviour of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in raw and mild pasteurised donkey milk treated with high pressure. Int Dairy J 136:105486. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105486 10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105486 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Di Renzo GC, Altieri G, Genovese F (2013) Donkey milk powder production and properties compared to other milk powders. Dairy Sci Technol 93:551–564. 10.1007/s13594-013-0108-7 10.1007/s13594-013-0108-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Faccia M, Gambacorta G, Martemucci G, Natrella G, D’Alessandro AG (2018) Technological attempts at producing cheese from donkey milk. J Dairy Res 85(3):327–330. 10.1017/S0022029918000420 10.1017/S0022029918000420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faccia M, Gambacorta G, Martemucci G, Difonzo G, D’Alessandro AG (2019) Chemical-sensory traits of fresh cheese made by enzymatic coagulation of donkey milk. Foods 9(1):16. 10.3390/foods9010016 10.3390/foods9010016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganatsios V, Nigam P, Plessas S, Terpou A (2021) Kefir as a functional beverage gaining momentum towards its health promoting attributes. Beverages 7(3):48. 10.3390/beverages7030048 10.3390/beverages7030048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Giuseppe I (2015) Donkey cheese made through pure camel chymosin. Afr J Food Sci 9(7):421–425 10.5897/AJFS2015.1322 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guénard-Lampron V, St-Gelais D, Villeneuve S, Turgeon S (2020) Effect of stirring operations on changes in physical and rheological properties of nonfat yogurts during storage. J Dairy Sci 103(1):210–214. 10.5897/AJFS2015.1322 10.5897/AJFS2015.1322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamida RS, Shami A, Ali MA, Almohawes ZN, Mohammed AE, Bin-Meferij MM (2021) Kefir: a protective dietary supplementation against viral infection. Biomed Pharmacother 133:110974. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110974 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hassan ZM, Manyelo TG, Nemukondeni N, Sebola AN, Selaledi L, Mabelebele M (2022) The possibility of including donkey meat and milk in the food chain: a southern African scenario. Animals 12(9):1073. 10.3390/ani12091073 10.3390/ani12091073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang L, Lv J, Liu J, Hao X, Ren F, Guo H (2018) Donkey milk lysozyme ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis by improving intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota composition. J Funct Foods 48:144–152. 10.1016/j.jff.2018.07.005 10.1016/j.jff.2018.07.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kocic H, Stankovic M, Tirant M, Lotti T, Arsic I (2020) Favorable effect of creams with skimmed donkey milk encapsulated in nanoliposomes on skin physiology. Dermatol Ther 33(4):e13511. 10.1111/dth.13511 10.1111/dth.13511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kriel G (2017) Donkey production: great economic opportunity or potential minefield? Farmers Wkly 2017(17044):36–40 [Google Scholar]
- Lajnaf R, Feki S, Ameur SB, Attia H, Kammoun T, Ayadi MA, Masmoudi H (2023) Cows’ milk alternatives for children with cows’ milk protein allergy-review of health benefits and risks of allergic reaction. Int Dairy J. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105624 10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105624 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lerksuthirat T, On-yam P, Chitphuk S, Stitchantrakul W, Newburg DS, Morrow AL, Hongeng S, Chiangjong W, Chutipongtanate S (2023) ALA-A2 Is a novel anticancer peptide inspired by Alpha-Lactalbumin: a discovery from a computational peptide library, In silico anticancer peptide screening and in vitro experimental validation. Global Chall 7(3):2200213. 10.1002/gch2.202200213 10.1002/gch2.202200213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Fan Y, Shaikh AS, Wang Z, Wang D, Tan H (2020) Dezhou donkey (Equus asinus) milk a potential treatment strategy for type 2 diabetes. J Ethnopharmacol 246:112221. 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112221 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L, Liu X, Guo H (2018) The nutritional ingredients and antioxidant activity of donkey milk and donkey milk powder. Food Sci Biotechnol 27(2):393–400. 10.1007/s10068-017-0264-2 10.1007/s10068-017-0264-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Ma Q, Liu G, Wang C (2022) Effects of donkey milk on oxidative stress and inflammatory response. J Food Biochem 46(4):e13935. 10.1111/jfbc.13935 10.1111/jfbc.13935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo J, Jian S, Wang P, Ren F, Wang F, Chen S, Guo H (2019) Thermal instability and characteristics of donkey casein micelles. Food Res Int 119:436–443. 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.02.023 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin CR, Ling PR, Blackburn GL (2016) Review of infant feeding: key features of breast milk and infant formula. Nutrients 8(5):279. 10.3390/nu8050279 10.3390/nu8050279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martini M, Altomonte I, Licitra R, Salari F (2018) Technological and seasonal variations of vitamin D and other nutritional components in donkey milk. J Dairy Sci 101(10):8721–8725. 10.3168/jds.2018-14776 10.3168/jds.2018-14776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martini M, Salari F, Licitra R, La Motta C, Altomonte I (2019) Lysozyme activity in donkey milk. Int Dairy J 96:98–101. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2019.04.009 10.1016/j.idairyj.2019.04.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Martini M, Altomonte I, Tricò D, Lapenta R, Salari F (2021) Current knowledge on functionality and potential therapeutic uses of donkey milk. Animals 11(5):1382. 10.3390/ani11051382 10.3390/ani11051382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Massouras T, Triantaphyllopoulos KA, Theodossiou I (2017) Chemical composition, protein fraction and fatty acid profile of donkey milk during lactation. Int Dairy J 75:83–90. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.06.007 10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.06.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Matera A, Altieri G, Genovese F, Polidori P, Vincenzetti S, Perna A, Simonetti A, Avei MR, Calbi A, Di Renzo GC (2022) Effect of continuous flow HTST treatments on donkey milk nutritional quality. Lwt 153:112444. 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112444 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112444 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Miao W, He R, Feng L, Ma K, Zhang C, Zhou J, Chen X, Rui X, Zhang Q, Dong M (2020) Study on processing stability and fermentation characteristics of donkey milk. Lwt 124:109151. 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109151 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109151 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mori F, Sarti L, Barni S, Pucci N, Belli F, Stagi S, Novembre E (2017) Donkey’s milk is well accepted and tolerated by infants with cow s milk food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: a preliminary study. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 27:269–271 10.18176/jiaci.0167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munir M, Nadeem M, Qureshi TM, Leong TS, Gamlath CJ, Martin GJ, Ashokkumar M (2019) Effects of high pressure, microwave and ultrasound processing on proteins and enzyme activity in dairy systems—a review. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 57:102192. 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102192 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102192 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nayak C, Ramachandra C, Kumar G (2020) A comprehensive review on composition of donkey milk in comparison to human, cow, buffalo, sheep, goat, camel and horse milk. Mysore J Agric Sci 54(3):42–50 [Google Scholar]
- Nayak CM, Ramachandra C, Nidoni U, Hiregoudar S, Ram J, Naik NM (2022) Influence of processing conditions on quality of Indian small grey donkey milk powder by spray drying. J Food Sci Technol 59(8):3266–3273. 10.1007/s13197-021-05340-w 10.1007/s13197-021-05340-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norris SL, Little HA, Ryding J, Raw Z (2021) Global donkey and mule populations: figures and trends. PLoS One 16(2):e0247830. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247830 10.1371/journal.pone.0247830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Organization W. H. (2022) WHO recommendations on maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal experience: World Health Organization. ISBN: 978-92-4-004598-9 [PubMed]
- Papademas P, Mousikos P, Aspri M (2020) Optimization of UV-C processing of donkey milk: an alternative to pasteurization? Animals 11(1):42. 10.3390/ani11010042 10.3390/ani11010042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papademas P, Kamilari E, Aspri M, Anagnostopoulos DA, Mousikos P, Kamilaris A, Tsaltas D (2021) Investigation of donkey milk bacterial diversity by 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing on a Cyprus donkey farm. J Dairy Sci 104(1):167–178. 10.3168/jds.2020-19242 10.3168/jds.2020-19242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perrella S, Gridneva Z, Lai CT, Stinson L, George A, Bilston-John S, Geddes D (2021) Human milk composition promotes optimal infant growth, development and health. Semin Perinatol 45:151380. 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151380 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ranadheera CS, Naumovski N, Ajlouni S (2018) Non-bovine milk products as emerging probiotic carriers: recent developments and innovations. Curr Opin Food Sci 22:109–114. 10.1016/j.cofs.2018.02.010 10.1016/j.cofs.2018.02.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Salgado M, Ramos M, Assis D, Otero D, Oliveira R, Ribeiro C, Costa M, Oliveira C (2021) Impact of fiber-rich donkey milk yogurt on apparent viscosity and sensory acceptance. Lwt 145:111494. 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111494 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111494 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Souroullas K, Aspri M, Papademas P (2018) Donkey milk as a supplement in infant formula: benefits and technological challenges. Food Res Int 109:416–425. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.051 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tedeschi T, Aspri M, Loffi C, Dellafiora L, Galaverna G, Papademas P (2023) Processing of raw donkey milk by pasteurisation and UV-C to produce freeze-dried milk powders: the effect on protein quality, digestibility and bioactive properties. Lwt 173:114404. 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114404 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114404 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tidona F, Carminati D, Cortellino G, Rizzolo A, Charfi I (2017) Functional properties of a strawberry ice cream based on donkey milk and lactic acid bacteria. Nutr Food Sci Int J 3(3):32–36. 10.19081/NFSIJ.2017.03.555613 10.19081/NFSIJ.2017.03.555613 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vashisht P, Chaudhary V, Sharma S, Devi H, Singh TP (2023) Whey Kefir: a sustainable solution to reduce waste and improve health. ACS Food Sci Technol 3(9):1403–1410. 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.3c00229 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.3c00229 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vincenzetti S, Pucciarelli S, Polzonetti V, Polidori P (2017) Role of proteins and of some bioactive peptides on the nutritional quality of donkey milk and their impact on human health. Beverages 3(3):34. 10.3390/beverages3030034 10.3390/beverages3030034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vincenzetti S, Cecchi T, Perinelli DR, Pucciarelli S, Polzonetti V, Bonacucina G, Ariani A, Parrocchia L, Spera DM, Ferretti E (2018) Effects of freeze-drying and spray-drying on donkey milk volatile compounds and whey proteins stability. Lwt 88:189–195. 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.10.019 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.10.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vinţe CG, Coroian A (2022) Donkey milk-benefits and hypoallergenic properties. Analele Universitatii din Oradea, Fascicula Ecotoxicologie, Zootehnie si Tehnologii în Industria Alimentara, 21
- Wang Y, Zhou X, Gong P, Chen Y, Feng Z, Liu P, Zhang P, Wang X, Zhang L, Song L (2020) Comparative major oligosaccharides and lactose between Chinese human and animal milk. Int Dairy J 108:104727. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104727 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104727 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yvon S, Olier M, Leveque M, Jard G, Tormo H, Haimoud-Lekhal DA, Peter M, Eutamène H (2018) Donkey milk consumption exerts anti-inflammatory properties by normalizing antimicrobial peptides levels in Paneth’s cells in a model of ileitis in mice. Eur J Nutr 57:155–166. 10.1007/s00394-016-1304-z 10.1007/s00394-016-1304-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No such data is available for this study.
Not applicable.

