Skip to main content
Journal of Surgical Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Surgical Case Reports
. 2024 Jul 23;2024(7):rjae468. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae468

Safety and efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated absorbable calcium sulfate beads (Stimulan) in cranioplasty

Alexander R Evans 1, Marianne E Kimmell 2, Abdurrahman F Kharbat 3, Hakeem J Shakir 4,
PMCID: PMC11264129  PMID: 39044778

Abstract

Cranioplasty is a common neurosurgical procedure that follows hemicraniectomy in the setting of neoplasm resection or increased intracranial pressure. Although standardized practices aim at minimizing infection risk, infection of the surgical site has been reported in 6.6%–8.4% of patients. In this work, we document the novel use of synthetic dissolvable antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads (STIMULANⓇ Rapid Cure, Biocomposites Ltd, Wilmington, NC, USA) in five cases of cranioplasty at our institution. Four patients experienced wound healing as expected with no complications related to the use of Stimulan beads. One patient’s clinical course was complicated by pseudomeningocele with superficial wound infection occurring 74 days following cranioplasty. Of note, this patient had suffered an avulsion injury and subgaleal hematoma of the scalp ipsilateral to the cranial incision, predisposing to infection due to incompetent scalp vasculature. No complications could be directly attributed to the use of STIMULANⓇ beads.

Keywords: antibiotic, calcium sulfate beads, cranioplasty, Stimulan

Introduction

Cranioplasty is a neurosurgical procedure that commonly follows hemicraniectomy in the setting of neoplasm resection or increased intracranial pressure. Although largely utilized for cosmesis and psychosocial benefit, restoration of cranial architecture has also been associated with the improvement of cerebral blood flow and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics [1]. Standard practice includes measures to minimize postoperative complication rates, often including application of antibiotic powder extradurally prior to closure; however, infection of the surgical site occurs in 6.6%–8.4% of patients, despite the administration of broad spectrum antibiotics [2, 3]. Given the notable incidence of infection, innovative techniques have emerged in efforts to minimize perioperative complication rates.

Within the setting of bone and joint infections, antibiotic-impregnated synthetic calcium sulfate beads have become a popular option in combating sepsis following orthopedic procedures [4–16]. Here, we report the novel use of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads in five cases of cranioplasty at our institution.

Case series

Methods

A single center retrospective chart review was performed and patients were identified by those receiving off-label use of extradural absorbable antibiotic-impregnated synthetic calcium sulfate beads (STIMULANⓇ Rapid Cure, Biocomposites Ltd, Wilmington, NC, USA) following cranioplasty (Fig. 1) performed by a single surgeon at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center between July 13, 2023 to November 9, 2023. All beads were impregnated with 500 g of vancomycin and 3 mL of tobramycin and ranged from small (3 mm) to medium (4.8 mm) in size. Sex, age, indication for procedure, procedure type, bead size, complications, and time to complication were obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR). Time to follow-up was determined from time of procedure to time of most recent documented hospital or clinic visit via EMR review on May 22, 2024.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Antibiotic-impregnated dissolvable synthetic calcium sulfate beads (Stimulan Rapid Cure) in a patient undergoing cranioplasty.

Results

Five patients were included in this study. Two were male and three were female with a mean age of 49.2 ± 10.9 years (range, 33–66). Of our cohort, four patients experienced wound healing as expected with no complications or side effects related to the use of STIMULANⓇ beads. One patient’s clinical course was complicated by pseudomeningocele with superficial wound infection occurring 74 days following cranioplasty. Of note, this patient had suffered an avulsion injury and subgaleal hematoma of the scalp ipsilateral to the cranial incision. No further complications were observed in this cohort. Average time to follow-up was 8.8 ± 1.6 months (range, 6.5–10.4). Indication for cranioplasty and additional information regarding procedure type can be found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of patients who underwent cranioplasty with the use of antibiotic-impregnated dissolvable synthetic calcium sulfate beads (STIMULANⓇ Rapid Cure).

Patient number Sex Age Indication for cranioplasty Procedure Bead size Complications Time to follow-up (months) Time to complication (days)
1 F 33 Wound dehiscence of prior cranioplasty Right cranioplasty with PEEK implant, fasciocutaneous advancement flap 4.8 mm None 10.4 N/A
2 M 67 Acute ischemic right MCA stroke Right hemicraniectomy with cranioplasty 4.8 mm None 8.9 N/A
3 F 43 Acquired skull defect Right hemicraniectomy with cranioplasty 4.8 mm Pseudomeningocele, surgical site infection 9.9 74
4 M 52 CVA due to thrombosis of cerebral artery Left hemicraniectomy, cranioplasty 3 mm None 7.6 N/A
5 F 52 SDH Left hemicraniectomy, evacuation of hematoma, cranioplasty 4.8 mm None 6.5 N/A

Abbreviations: M = male, F = female, PEEK = polyetheretherketone, N/A = not applicable, MCA = middle cerebral artery, CVA = cerebrovascular accident, SDH = subdural hematoma.

Discussion

In the setting of cranioplasty, it is likely that extradural administration of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads (STIMULANⓇ) provides a safe and effective method of preventing infection in the perioperative period. The majority of patients were complication-free at time of EMR review, with one patient experiencing pseudomeningocele with superficial wound infection 74 days following surgery (Table 1). However, this patient originally presented with a skull avulsion, which may predispose to wound infection or subgaleal collection secondary to incompetent scalp vasculature. Moreover, time to infection following cranioplasty (autologous or otherwise) has been reported anywhere from 35 to 40 days postoperatively [17, 18]; thus, it is inconclusive if the observed complication occurred due to superficial wound contamination from skin flora, compromised scalp vasculature, or inadequate infection prophylaxis at time of cranioplasty. As such, this complication could not be definitively attributed to extradural STIMULANⓇ administration.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads used off-label with the aim of preventing infection following cranioplasty. Previous efforts to prevent perioperative infection in the setting of cranioplasty have tailored prophylactic antibiotics to each patient’s colonizing flora, which has been significantly associated with decreased infection rates when compared with conventional prophylactic antibiotic regimens [19]. However, the use of Stimulan beads has most notably been adopted in the field of orthopedic surgery, chiefly in the setting of arthroplasty, bone/joint infection, or acquired osteomyelitis [4–6, 11, 13–15, 20–22]. Furthermore, the efficacy and adaptability of this technology has led to its adoption in fields such as plastic and general surgery, as there have been documented cases of the use of STIMULANⓇ (as prophylaxis or salvage therapy) in both breast implantation and hernia repair [23–25].

Moreover, Kenna and colleagues exemplified the utility of this technology in breast reconstruction surgery, as tissue expander loss secondary to infection was 1.5% when using STIMULANⓇ prophylactically compared with 11.9% when using intravenous antibiotics alone [24]. What is more, Sherif et al. [23] demonstrated the ability of STIMULANⓇ to treat active infection in breast implantation, with successful implantation salvage observed in 75% of patients receiving the beads; further groups have demonstrated the resolution of active infection in long bones following STIMULANⓇ use [13, 20, 21], with infection remission rates being as high as 76.7% in cases of chronic osteomyelitis [14]. In addition, STIMULANⓇ has been observed to encourage osteoconduction and bone regeneration following partial fibulectomy in pediatric patients [12], which exemplifies the broad utility of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads.

Although STIMULANⓇ Rapid Cure technology demonstrates profound promise in minimizing perioperative infection rates, notable complications have been reported in the literature. Due to the chemical profile and bioavailable nature of the beads, systemic hypercalcemia has been observed, with rare cases going on to develop dystrophic calcification or acute kidney injury [5, 22]. However, hypercalcemia secondary to STIMULANⓇ use is generally transient with no indication for medical intervention, and no patients in the current study experienced changes in plasma calcium following Stimulan bead administration.

This work is subject to a variety of limitations and confounding bias as a consequence of limited sample size and follow-up time. Future directions should include randomized prospective cohort studies to determine the true postsurgical infection rates of those undergoing cranioplasty who receive traditional infection prophylaxis compared with antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads. It is our hope that these preliminary data demonstrate the potential for diverse utility of STIMULANⓇ beads in neurosurgical procedures, albeit within the limitations of the small sample size and minimal follow-up period of the current work.

We report preliminary data regarding the novel use of synthetic absorbable antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads (STIMULANⓇ) in cranioplasty as applied in an extradural manner prior to closing the skull. Furthermore, the majority of patients treated with STIMULANⓇ were complication-free at follow-up, which exemplifies the need for judicious selection of postoperative infection prevention modalities, as those with compromised scalp vasculature may be predisposed to the development of subgaleal hemorrhage and/or wound infection. Although a larger sample size is necessary to determine a true complication profile, these preliminary data encourage further study of STIMULANⓇ use in neurosurgical procedures.

Contributor Information

Alexander R Evans, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.

Marianne E Kimmell, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.

Abdurrahman F Kharbat, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.

Hakeem J Shakir, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

  • 1. Piazza M, Grady MS. Cranioplasty. Neurosurg Clin N Am  2017;28:257–65. 10.1016/j.nec.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Morton RP, Abecassis IJ, Hanson JF, et al.  Predictors of infection after 754 cranioplasty operations and the value of intraoperative cultures for cryopreserved bone flaps. J Neurosurg  2016;125:766–70. 10.3171/2015.8.JNS151390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shibahashi K, Hoda H, Takasu Y, et al.  Cranioplasty outcomes and analysis of the factors influencing surgical site infection: a retrospective review of more than 10 years of institutional experience. World Neurosurg  2017;101:20–5. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mereddy P, Nallamilli SR, Gowda VP, et al.  The use of Stimulan in bone and joint infections. Bone Jt Open  2023;4:516–22. 10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0036.R1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kallala R, Harris WE, Ibrahim M, et al.  Use of Stimulan absorbable calcium sulphate beads in revision lower limb arthroplasty: safety profile and complication rates. Bone Jt Res  2018;7:570–9. 10.1302/2046-3758.710.BJR-2017-0319.R1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sandiford NA. Complication rates are low with the use of Stimulan calcium sulphate based antibiotic delivery system in the management of patients with hip-related PJI: early results of a consecutive case series. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther  2020;30:3–6. 10.1177/1120700020925093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Choudhry B, Mitchell J, Milner S. A surgeon’s trial success of curing pedal eumycetoma. BMJ Case Rep  2023;16:e218559. 10.1136/bcr-2016-218559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lavía KF, Izquierdo Ó, Boccolini HS, et al.  Treatment of a case of septic tibial nonunion by the Capanna technique. Trauma Case Rep  2023;47:100912. 10.1016/j.tcr.2023.100912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Patel PD, Canseco JA, Houlihan N, et al.  Overview of minimally invasive spine surgery. World Neurosurg  2020;142:43–56. 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Aravindasamy M, Harshavardhan JKG. A rare case of distal humerus intraosseous arteriovenous malformation. J Orthop Case Rep  2019;9:43–6. 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.1526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Morley R, Lopez F, Webb F. Calcium sulphate as a drug delivery system in a deep diabetic foot infection. Foot Edinb Scotl  2016;27:36–40. 10.1016/j.foot.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Goru P, Haque S, Hirst T, et al.  Regeneration of fibula following distal fibulectomy for ankle arthrodesis following the use of calcium sulphate granules: a case series and review of the literature. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr  2021;16:123–6. 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thankappan A, Nasimudeen N, Thomas A, et al.  Emphysematous osteomyelitis of tibia - a rare case treated with antibiotic-loaded absorbable calcium sulfate beads. J Orthop Case Rep  2022;12:14–8. 10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i11.3396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Badie AA, Arafa MS. One-stage surgery for adult chronic osteomyelitis: concomitant use of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate and bone marrow aspirate. Int Orthop  2019;43:1061–70. 10.1007/s00264-018-4063-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Qin CH, Zhou CH, Song HJ, et al.  Infected bone resection plus adjuvant antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate versus infected bone resection alone in the treatment of diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord  2019;20:246. 10.1186/s12891-019-2635-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Menon A, Soman R, Rodrigues C, et al.  Careful interpretation of the wound status is needed with use of antibiotic impregnated biodegradable synthetic pure calcium sulfate beads: series of 39 cases. J Bone Jt Infect  2018;3:87–93. 10.7150/jbji.22684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Alves Junior AC, Hamamoto Filho PT, Gonçalves MP, et al.  Cranioplasty: an institutional experience. J Craniofac Surg  2018;29:1402–5. 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Alkhaibary A, Alharbi A, Abbas M, et al.  Predictors of surgical site infection in autologous cranioplasty: a retrospective analysis of subcutaneously preserved bone flaps in abdominal pockets. World Neurosurg  2020;133:e627–32. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Paredes I, Lagares A, San-Juan R, et al.  Reduction in the infection rate of cranioplasty with a tailored antibiotic prophylaxis: a nonrandomized study. Acta Neurochir  2020;162:2857–66. 10.1007/s00701-020-04508-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Thahir A, Lim JA, West C, et al.  The use of calcium sulphate beads in the management of osteomyelitis of femur and tibia: a systematic review. Arch Bone Jt Surg  2022;10:320–7. 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53566.2661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Patel P, Iliadis AD, Vris A, et al.  Intramedullary application of local antibiotic bullets for the treatment of long bone fracture related infection. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol  2023;33:385–91. 10.1007/s00590-022-03205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Abosala A, Ali M. The use of calcium sulphate beads in periprosthetic joint infection, a systematic review. J Bone Jt Infect  2020;5:43–9. 10.7150/jbji.41743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sherif RD, Ingargiola M, Sanati-Mehrizy P, et al.  Use of antibiotic beads to salvage infected breast implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS  2017;70:1386–90. 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kenna DM, Irojah BB, Mudge K, et al.  Absorbable antibiotic beads prophylaxis in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg  2018;141:486e–92e. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Drohan A, Minor S. Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias with the novel use of calcium sulphate antibiotic beads in conjunction with biologic porcine submucosa tissue graft. Can J Surg J Can Chir  2020;63:E530–2. 10.1503/cjs.021819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Surgical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES