Abstract
Background
Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is an X‐linked recessive disorder that predisposes individuals to hemolysis due to an inborn error of metabolism. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate G6PD deficiency as a possible etiology of nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) and severe fetal anemia.
Methods
PubMed, OVID Medline, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were queried from inception until 31 April 2023 for all published cases of NIHF and severe fetal anemia caused by G6PD deficiency. Keywords included “fetal edema,” “hydrops fetalis,” “glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” and “fetal anemia.” Cases with workup presuming G6PD deficiency as an etiology for NIHF and severe fetal anemia were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed.
Results
Five cases of G6PD‐related NIHF and one case of severe fetal anemia were identified. Four fetuses (4/6, 66.7%) were male and two fetuses (2/6, 33.3%) were female. Mean gestational age at diagnosis of NIHF/anemia and delivery was 32.2 ± 4.9 and 35.7 ± 2.4 weeks, respectively. Four cases (66.7%) required a cordocentesis for fetal transfusion, and two cases (33.3%) received blood transfusions immediately following delivery. Among the four multigravida cases, two (50%) noted previous pregnancies complicated by neonatal anemia. When reported, the maternal cases included two G6PD deficiency carrier patients and two G6PD‐deficient patients. Exposures to substances known to cause G6PD deficiency‐related hemolysis occurred in 3/6 (50%) cases.
Conclusion
Six cases of NIHF/severe fetal anemia were associated with G6PD deficiency. While G6PD deficiency is an X‐linked recessive condition, female fetuses can be affected. Fetal G6PD deficiency testing can be considered if parental history indicates, particularly if the standard workup for NIHF is negative.
Keywords: fetal anemia, G6PD deficiency, hydrops fetalis, prenatal diagnosis
Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is a rare cause of nonimmune hydrops fetalis and most cases require fetal or neonatal transfusion. Although G6PD deficiency is an X‐linked recessive condition, female fetuses can be affected. Testing should be considered if parental history indicates.

1. INTRODUCTION
Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) is defined by the presence of abnormal fluid collection in two or more fetal compartments in the absence of red cell alloimmunization. (DeBolt et al., 2022) Nonimmune hydrops may occur as a result of a wide spectrum of etiologies including infectious, structural (such as cardiac abnormalities), genetic, metabolic, and hematologic (Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Norton, et al., 2015; Quinn et al., 2021). Our previously published systematic review showed that after the standard workup (Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Norton, et al., 2015) for NIHF, 40%–81% of cases lack a definitive diagnosis, (Iyer et al., 2021) making it difficult for providers to counsel about potential treatments and implications for future pregnancies. If the cause of NIHF remains unknown after the standard workup, maternal and family history may provide additional information to guide testing.
Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is an X‐linked recessive disorder in which a variant in the G6PD gene (305900) leads to deficient expression of the corresponding enzyme. The G6PD enzyme is involved in protecting erythrocytes from oxidative stress. (Harcke et al., 2019) Deficiency of this enzyme can lead to increased hemolysis in the presence of certain exposures, such as sulfonamide use or fava bean consumption. The condition is most prevalent in Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Mediterranean Europe. However, more than 10% of Black males in the United States are affected (Genetics Home Reference, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2006).
G6PD deficiency has been well‐described in pediatric literature as a potential cause for childhood anemia. Clinical guidance from the Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM) has recommended consideration of G6PD testing when NIHF or fetal anemia is diagnosed; however, the typical disease course in pregnancy and fetal and pregnancy outcomes have not been previously described. (Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Mari, et al., 2015; Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Norton, et al., 2015) Here, we performed a systematic literature review to identify all published cases of NIHF and severe fetal anemia occurring in the setting of G6PD deficiency. Our primary objective was to describe the typical clinical presentation, disease course, and fetal outcomes.
2. METHODS
PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed from inception until 31 April 2023 for all cases of NIHF and fetal anemia that were attributed to G6PD deficiency. Keywords included “fetal edema,” “hydrops fetalis,” “glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” and “fetal anemia.” Related MESH terms were used in our search (Appendix A). There was no language restriction. The literature search was supplemented by reviewing relevant citations in the initial studies identified. Two investigators (N.S.I. and M.H.M.) performed the literature search with the help of the librarian.
Two reviewers (N.S.I. and M.H.M.) initially screened all manuscripts independently, and then, the results were reviewed together. The criteria for the diagnosis of NIHF or severe fetal anemia in each study, maternal clinical presentation, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded. Additionally, the NIHF workup and G6PD workup were documented. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for a systematic review of observational studies. (Page et al., 2021) This study was exempt from institutional review board approval.
3. RESULTS
Six cases of NIHF and severe fetal anemia attributed to G6PD deficiency were published in the literature (Figure 1) (Keller et al., 2015; Masson et al., 1995; Mentzer & Collier, 1975; Molad et al., 2013; Perkins, 1971; Suria et al., 2014). These six cases are summarized in Table 1. Of these six cases, five (83.3%) described NIHF, (Masson et al., 1995; Mentzer & Collier, 1975; Molad et al., 2013; Perkins, 1971; Suria et al., 2014) while one (16.7%) reported severe fetal anemia (Keller et al., 2015). Two of the six (33.3%) fetuses were female (Molad et al., 2013; Suria et al., 2014). The mean gestational age at diagnosis of NIHF/anemia was 32.2 (±4.9) weeks. Out of the five cases with NIHF, four reported the diagnostic criteria of NIHF, and this included fetal abdominal ascites (n=4), pleural effusions (n=3), skin edema (n=2), and pericardial effusions (n=1). One fetal anemia case was suspected by a fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity of 1.65 MoM. Four cases (66.7%) underwent cordocentesis that confirmed fetal anemia and were subsequently transfused (Keller et al., 2015; Masson et al., 1995; Molad et al., 2013; Suria et al., 2014).
FIGURE 1.

PRISMA flow diagram for NIHF/severe fetal anemia caused by G6PD deficiency. This figure depicts the PRISMA flow diagram used for case inclusion. Records were identified through database searching, and duplicate records were removed. Records not pertaining to NIHF and G6PD were excluded. Full‐text articles were assessed, and records describing neonatal/childhood anemia and NIHF not presumed to be caused by G6PD deficiency were excluded. A total of six studies were included in qualitative synthesis. G6PD, glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase; NIHF, nonimmune hydrops fetalis.
TABLE 1.
Summary of published cases of NIHF/severe fetal anemia caused by G6PD deficiency.
| Case | Perkins (1971) | Mentzer and Collier (1975) | Masson et al. (1995) | Molad et al. (2013) | Suria et al. (2014) | Keller et al. (2015) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal race | Black | Asian | Black | White | Asian | White |
| Diagnosis | Hydrops fetalis | Hydrops fetalis | Hydrops fetalis | Hydrops fetalis | Hydrops fetalis | Severe anemia |
| Diagnostic criteria | NR | Abdominal ascites, generalized skin edema, pleural effusions | Abdominal ascites, pleural effusions | Abdominal ascites, pericardial effusions | Abdominal ascites, generalized skin edema, pleural effusions | MCA PSV = 1.65 MoM |
| Time of diagnosis | Postpartum | Postpartum | Prenatal | Prenatal | Prenatal | Prenatal |
| GA at diagnosis | 36w | 38w | 24w | 33w | 31w | 31w |
| GA at delivery | 36w | 38w | 34w | 34w | 33w | 39w |
| Mode of delivery | Vaginal delivery | Vaginal delivery | Emergency cesarean section | Emergency cesarean section | Emergency cesarean section | Emergency cesarean section |
| Fetal sex | M | M | M | F | F | M |
| Hydrops evaluation | Maternal and fetal hemoglobin electrophoresis; Direct and indirect Coombs testing | Maternal, paternal, and fetal hemoglobin electrophoresis; Direct and indirect Coombs testing | Direct and indirect Coombs testing; fetal karyotype; CMV, Rubella, Parvovirus | Direct and indirect Coombs testing; fetal karyotype; CMV, Rubella, Parvovirus, Toxoplasmosis, EBV, HSV, HIV testing | Direct and indirect Coombs testing; CMV, Rubella, Toxoplasmosis, HSV; Thyroid function testing | NR |
| G6PD diagnosis | G6PD enzyme activity | G6PD enzyme activity | G6PD enzyme activity | G6PD enzyme activity | G6PD enzyme activity | G6PD gene testing |
| Fetal outcome | Stillbirth | Neonatal Death | Living | Living | Living | Living |
| Maternal G6PD status | Homozygous | Heterozygous | Not specified | Homozygous | Not specified | Heterozygous: c.1249C>T p.Arg417Cys |
| *Fetal G6PD enzyme level/activity | 0.8 U/gHgb (N: 15.5 U/gHGb) | Abnormal, enzyme level not reported | 35 mU/103 RBC (N: 95–125 mU/103 RBC) | 6 IU (N: 10–14.2 IU) | 10.65 U/gHgb (N: 10.15–14.71 U/gHgb) | NR |
*The manuscript by Suria et al., mentions that the enzyme level was “low normal” at birth, acknowledging that at the time of the test, the baby's reticulocyte count was elevated and the baby had received intra‐uterine transfusion about three weeks earlier, which could result in a transient and mildly elevated enzyme level.
Abbreviations: CMV, cytomegalovirus; GA, gestational age; G6PD, glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase; Hgb, hemoglobin; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MoM, multiples of median; NR, not reported; PPROM, preterm premature rupture of membranes; PSV, peak systolic velocity; RBC, red blood cells.
Three cases reported notable maternal medical and family history. One patient had a known family history of G6PD deficiency, and subsequently had a postive molecular diagnosis at 22 weeks and weekly fetal ultrasounds starting at 24 weeks. Also, family history of hydrops fetalis in a maternal brother and maternal uncle were also reported for this patient (Keller et al., 2015). Another disclosed neonatal jaundice and adult anemia in multiple relatives (Mentzer & Collier, 1975). The third case was significant for a prior delivery of a male infant with presumed G6PD deficiency with subsequent infant death of an undetermined cause at 59 days of life (Perkins, 1971).Two out of the four multiparous patients (50%) reported previous pregnancies complicated by neonatal anemia (Mentzer & Collier, 1975; Perkins, 1971). Moreover, two (2/4, 50%) were G6PD deficiency carriers (Keller et al., 2015; Mentzer & Collier, 1975) and two (2/4, 50%) were G6PD‐deficient (Molad et al., 2013; Perkins, 1971). The remaining two cases did not specify maternal G6PD deficiency status (Masson et al., 1995; Suria et al., 2014).
The mean gestational age of delivery was 35.7 ± 2.4 weeks. Among the five cases with diagnosed hydrops fetalis, two (40%) were diagnosed on autopsy following stillbirth or neonatal death (Mentzer & Collier, 1975; Perkins, 1971). One case reported treatment of a UTI with sulfisoxazole 17 days prior to spontaneous delivery of a stillborn infant. Autopsy showed severe anemia and hydrops fetalis (Perkins, 1971). The second case reported neonatal death 2 hours after delivery. Autopsy showed generalized brawny edema, atelectatic lungs, pleural effusions, and hepatosplenomegaly, with evidence of extramedullary hepatic hematopoiesis and erythroid hyperplasia within the bone marrow (Mentzer & Collier, 1975). These two cases were delivered vaginally (Mentzer & Collier, 1975; Perkins, 1971), while the remaining four underwent emergent cesarean delivery at the time of delivery (Keller et al., 2015; Masson et al., 1995; Molad et al., 2013; Suria et al., 2014). Indications for emergent cesarean delivery included recurrence of hydrops fetalis (Masson et al., 1995), fetal anemia (Molad et al., 2013), prolonged rupture of membranes (Suria et al., 2014), and failure to progress in labor (Keller et al., 2015).
In terms of fetal and neonatal outcomes, there was one stillbirth (16.7%) and one neonatal death (16.7%). Of the four living infants, two (50%) received blood transfusions immediately following delivery (Masson et al., 1995; Molad et al., 2013), while one (25%) was re‐admitted at 8 months for blood transfusion (Keller et al., 2015). The two cases that received blood transfusions following delivery reported readmission during the first year of life for additional blood transfusions at 30 days (Masson et al., 1995) and 6 weeks (Molad et al., 2013), respectively. The fourth infant was lost to follow‐up after initial discharge from the hospital (Suria et al., 2014).
One case (16.7%) reported molecular testing for G6PD deficiency in utero, via cordocentesis (Keller et al., 2015), while neonatal G6PD deficiency testing was reported in the 5/6 (83.3%) remaining cases by G6PD enzyme levels (Perkins et al., 1971; Mentzer & Collier, 1975; Masson et al., 1995; Molad et al., 2013; Suria, et al., 2014).
Of the five cases with hydrops fetalis, three (60%) reported maternal exposures to substances that are known to cause G6PD deficiency‐related hemolysis. Of these three cases, one (33%) reported usage of sulfa‐containing medication (Perkins, 1971), one (33%) reported fava beans consumption (Molad et al., 2013), and one (33%) reported consumption of both fava beans and ascorbic acid (Mentzer & Collier, 1975). All three of these exposures occurred within 1 month preceding hydrops diagnosis and delivery (Mentzer & Collier, 1975; Molad et al., 2013; Perkins, 1971).
4. DISCUSSION
G6PD deficiency appears to be a rare cause of NIHF and severe fetal anemia. While G6PD deficiency has been well‐described in the pediatric literature, particularly in the evaluation of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and anemia (Liu et al., 2015; Watchko et al., 2013), our systematic review is the first to summarize the association between suspected G6PD deficiency as an etiology for NIHF and severe fetal anemia.
Further workup for NIHF is essential to effectively counsel patients about potential treatment options, possible neonatal outcomes, and implications for future pregnancies. Thus, with a known family history, patients should be evaluated for G6PD deficiency as a potential cause of NIHF or severe fetal anemia following standard workup (Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Mari, et al., 2015; Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Norton, et al., 2015). When fetal anemia is suspected prenatally, evaluation for fetomaternal hemorrhage is recommended (Troia et al., 2019).
Routine newborn screening in the United States does not include testing for G6PD deficiency, except in the District of Columbia. In most states, G6PD deficiency testing is only recommended in newborns with hyperbilirubinemia refractory to phototherapy or newborns who have a family history, ethnicity, or geographic origin that is suggestive of the condition (American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia, 2004). Furthermore, SMFM recommends consideration of G6PD testing when NIHF or fetal anemia is diagnosed (Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Mari, et al., 2015; Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Norton, et al., 2015). In most places in the world, screening for G6PD deficiency in newborns is done by the fluorescent spot test prior to confirmatory testing using either a quantitative enzyme activity assay or molecular DNA testing (Cappellini & Fiorelli, 2008). In the United States, rapid fluorescent spot test or G6PD enzyme testing is commonly utilized for initial screening (Hsia et al., 1993; Lin et al., 2005). If screening demonstrates deficiency of G6PD, follow‐up molecular genetic testing can be considered with G6PD full gene sequencing. Deletion/duplication testing may be performed if sequencing is not informative (Hsia et al., 1993). While there are currently 400 known G6PD variants with functional interpretations (Algur et al., 2012), the five most common variants accounting for up to 89% of all G6PD deficiency cases include c.376A>G, c.202G>A, c.563C>T, c.1376G>T, and c.1388G>A. These variants have ethnic and racial associations, including with African‐American (c.376A>G, c.202G>A), Mediterranean (c.563C>T), and Chinese (c.1376G>T, c.1388G>A) populations (Wang et al., 2014). During pregnancy, testing for G6PD deficiency will typically be done via sequencing of the G6PD gene from an amniotic fluid sample (Wang et al., 2014). In our review, only one out of the six cases had genetic testing (by cordocentesis) and did not result in one of the most common variants listed.
Notably, two of the six (33.3%) cases in our review occurred in female fetuses. Because G6PD deficiency follows X‐linked recessive inheritance, males who inherit the G6PD variant are hemizygous and will usually present with hemolytic symptoms. Whether heterozygous females develop G6PD symptoms depends on X chromosome inactivation and the degree of silencing of the normal and abnormal X chromosomes. Typically, the inactivation occurs randomly, and therefore, the normal and abnormal chromosomes will be deactivated in 50% of the cells. This allows adequate G6PD enzyme activity and absence of symptoms in heterozygous females. In cases of unfavorable or skewed X chromosome inactivation, the unaffected X chromosome is silenced in most cells, leading to inadequate G6PD enzyme activity and hemolysis symptoms. The prevalence of females who are homozygous for the G6PD deficiency variant is reported to be about 1%, even in high risk populations, like racial or ethnic groups with higher disease prevalence (Garcia et al., 2021; Richardson & O'Malley, 2023). These homozygous females present with a more severe phenotype. Recent literature has described DNA methylation as an additional potential reason for why heterozygous females may have various phenotypes, with some developing severe enzyme deficiency (Geck et al., 2023).
Historically, treatment of G6PD deficiency has involved elimination and avoidance of drugs, foods, or infections, which can trigger hemolysis in these individuals. Three (50%) cases in our review involved exposure to substances known to cause G6PD deficiency‐related hemolysis. This reinforces the need for strict counseling for patients with G6PD deficiency or carrier status about the potential effects on their pregnancy. In neonates, once hemolysis is diagnosed, treatment usually consists of phototherapy, and in severe cases, exchange transfusion may be warranted (American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia, 2004). In utero, the only treatment presently available is transfusion via cordocentesis, which four (66.7%) of the fetuses identified in our search received. No gene therapy is currently available to treat G6PD deficiency, likely due to the large number of variants that can cause the disease; however, newer studies are exploring the use of molecular activators to correct the most common variants, stabilize the G6PD gene, and protect cells from oxidative stress (Lee et al., 2022).
There are no previously published reviews evaluating G6PD deficiency as a cause for hydrops fetalis or severe fetal anemia, and as such, our review summarizes the risk factors and clinical outcomes related to this diagnosis. Another strength of our review is the inclusion of only peer‐reviewed publications.
A limitation of our study is the fact that a review can only be as reliable as the published cases. This ascertainment bias was mitigated by having minimal exclusion criteria and no language restriction. Given the paucity of published cases, we are unable to determine the true prevalence of G6PD deficiency as a cause for NIHF or severe fetal anemia. As our study relied on searching through published cases, it is important to acknowledge the potential impact of publication bias, as cases with non‐significant findings often go unreported. As stated previously, our goal in publishing the review was to describe the clinical presentation and pregnancy outcomes related to this diagnosis. Future research should focus on understanding the prevalence of G6PD deficiency as a cause for NIHF/severe fetal anemia and potential treatments, given the options presently available for in utero treatment of NIHF/severe fetal anemia due to G6PD deficiency.
We summarized five cases of NIHF and one case of severe fetal anemia associated with G6PD. Our review demonstrated that G6PD deficiency is a rare cause of NIHF/severe fetal anemia. While G6PD deficiency is an X‐linked recessive condition, female fetuses can be affected. Fetal G6PD deficiency testing can be considered if parental history indicates, particularly if standard workup for NIHF is negative.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
NSI and HBA were involved in the conceptualization and development of the study methodology. NSI and MHM performed the literature search and data abstraction with supervision from HBA. NSI, MHM, TJG, LHC, and DDM were involved in the data analysis and manuscript preparation. LHC, DDM, RAM, and HBA were responsible for manuscript revision and review. TJG was responsible for visualization of the figures and tables in the study. RAM and HBA supervised the entire project.
FUNDING INFORMATION
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
5. ETHICS STATEMENT
An ethics statement is not applicable because this study is based exclusively on published literature.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Abby Adamcyzk (Thomas Jefferson University Libraries) for assisting with the search.
APPENDIX A. Search strategy
A.1. OVID‐MEDLINE SEARCH STRATEGY
(((exp Edema/ and exp Fetal Diseases/) or exp Hydrops Fetalis/) OR ((fetal edema or fetal hydrops or hydrops fetalis or fetal anemia or fetal anaemia or foetal hydrops or foetal anaemia or foetal anemia or foetal oedema or fetal oedema or foetal edema or hydrops or hydrops fetali).mp)) AND ((exp Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency/) OR ((glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase or glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase or G6PD or glucosephosphate dehydrogenase or gpd).mp).
A.2. SCOPUS SEARCH STRATEGY
((INDEXTERMS ((“Edema” AND “Fetal Diseases”) OR “Hydrops Fetalis”)) OR (TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ((fetal AND edema) OR (fetal AND hydrops) OR (hydrops AND fetalis) OR (fetal AND anemia) OR (fetal AND anaemia) OR (foetal AND hydrops) OR (foetal AND anaemia) OR (foetal AND anemia) OR (foetal AND oedema) OR (fetal AND oedema) OR (foetal AND edema) OR (hydrops AND fetali) OR (hydrops) OR (non‐immune AND hydrops AND fetalis)))) AND ((INDEXTERMS (“Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency”)) OR (TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ((glucose‐6‐phosphate AND dehydrogenase) OR (glucose 6 phosphate AND dehydrogenase) OR (g6pd) OR (glucosephosphate AND dehydrogenase) OR (gpd) OR (g6pd AND deficiency) OR (glucose‐6‐phosphate AND dehydrogenase AND deficiency)))).
A.3. PUBMED SEARCH STRATEGY
(((“Edema”[MeSH] AND “Fetal Diseases”[Mesh]) OR “Hydrops Fetalis”[MeSH]) OR ((fetal edema OR fetal hydrops OR hydrops fetalis OR fetal anemia OR fetal anaemia OR foetal hydrops OR foetal anaemia OR foetal anemia OR foetal oedema OR fetal oedema OR foetal edema OR hydrops fetali OR hydrops OR non‐immune hydrops fetalis))) AND ((“Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency”[Mesh]) OR ((glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase OR glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase OR G6PD OR glucosephosphate dehydrogenase OR gpd OR G6PD deficiency OR glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency))).
A.4. DATA SOURCES
Ovid MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Pubmed were searched using terms related to: “fetal edema,” “fetal diseases,” “fetal anemia,” “hydrops fetalis,” and “Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency.” There was no limitation placed on the language, year, or location of the studies included in the initial search strategy.
Iyer, N. S. , Mossayebi, M. H. , Gao, T. J. , Haizler‐Cohen, L. , Di Mascio, D. , McLaren, R. A. Jr , & Al‐Kouatly, H. B. (2024). Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency as a cause for nonimmune hydrops fetalis and severe fetal anemia: A systematic review. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 12, e2491. 10.1002/mgg3.2491
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- Algur, N. , Avraham, I. , Hammerman, C. , & Kaplan, M. (2012). Quantitative neonatal glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase screening: Distribution, reference values, and classification by phenotypes. The Journal of Pediatrics, 161(2), 197–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia . (2004). Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics, 114, 297–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cappellini, M. D. , & Fiorelli, G. (2008). Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Lancet, 371(9606), 64–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeBolt, C. , Connolly, K. , Norton, M. E. , & Stone, J. (2022). Nonimmune hydrops fetalis. In Berghella V. (Ed.), Maternal‐fetal evidence‐based guidelines (4th ed., p. 478). Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, A. A. , Koperniku, A. , Ferreira, J. C. B. , & Mochly‐Rosen, D. (2021). Treatment strategies for glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: Past and future perspectives. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 42(10), 829–844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geck, R. C. , Powell, N. R. , & Dunham, M. J. (2023). Functional interpretation, cataloging, and analysis of 1,341 glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase variants. American Journal of Human Genetics, 110(2), 228–239. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genetics Home Reference, U.S. National Library of Medicine . (2006). Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/glucose‐6‐phosphate‐dehydrogenase‐deficiency
- Harcke, S. J. , Rizzolo, D. , & Harcke, H. T. (2019). G6PD deficiency. JAAPA, 32(11), 21–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsia, Y. E. , Miyakawa, F. , Baltazar, J. , Ching, N. S. , Yuen, J. , Westwood, B. , & Beutler, E. (1993). Frequency of glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) mutations in Chinese, Filipinos, and Laotians from Hawaii. Human Genetics, 92(5), 470–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iyer, N. S. , Gimovsky, A. C. , Ferreira, C. R. , Critchlow, E. J. , & Al‐Kouatly, H. B. (2021). Lysosomal storage disorders as an etiology of nonimmune hydrops fetalis: A systematic review. Clinical Genetics, 100(5), 493–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keller, C. C. , Joosten, M. , Middeldorp, A. M. , & Knapen, M. F. C. M. (2015). Fetal anemia caused by the Guadalajara variant of G6PD deficiency. Prenatal Diagnosis, 35(12), 1255–1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H. Y. , Ithnin, A. , Azma, R. Z. , Othman, A. , Salvador, A. , & Cheah, F. C. (2022). Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: Insights on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and gene variants in disease heterogeneity. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 24(10), 875877. 10.3389/fped.2022.875877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Z. , Fontaine, J. M. , Freer, D. E. , & Naylor, E. W. (2005). Alternative DNA‐based newborn screening for glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 86(1–2), 212–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H. , Liu, W. , Tang, X. , & Wang, T. (2015). Association between G6PD deficiency and hyperbilirubinemia in neonates: A meta‐analysis. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 32(2), 92–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masson, P. , Rigot, A. , & Cecile, W. (1995). Anasarque faetoplacentaire et deficit en G‐6‐PD. Archives de Pédiatrie, 2, 541–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mentzer, W. C. , & Collier, E. (1975). Hydrops fetalis associated with erythrocyte G‐6‐PD deficiency and maternal ingestion of fava beans and ascorbic acid. Pediatrics, 86(4), 565–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molad, M. , Waisman, D. , Rotschild, A. , Auslander, R. , Kessel, I. , Soloviechick, M. , Goldberg, Y. , & Shabad, E. (2013). Nonimmune hydrops fetalis caused by G6PD deficiency hemolytic crisis and congenital dyserythropoietic anemia. Journal of Perinatology, 33, 490–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Page, M. J. , Moher, D. , Bossuyt, P. M. , Boutron, I. , Hoffmann, T. C. , Mulrow, C. D. , Moher, D. , Bossuyt, P. M. , Boutron, I. , Hoffmann, T. C. , Mulrow, C. D. , Shamseer, L. , Tetzlaff, J. M. , Akl, E. A. , Brennan, S. E. , Chou, R. , Glanville, J. , Grimshaw, J. M. , Hróbjartsson, A. , … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, n160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perkins, R. P. (1971). Hydrops fetalis and stillbirth in a male glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase‐deficient fetus possibly due to maternal ingestion of sulfisoxazole. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 111(3), 379–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quinn, A. M. , Valcarcel, B. N. , Makhamreh, M. M. , Al‐Kouatly, H. B. , & Berger, S. I. (2021). A systematic review of monogenic etiologies of nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Genetics in Medicine, 23(1), 3–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, S. R. , & O'Malley, G. F. (2023). Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. In StatPearls. [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470315/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM) , Mari, G. , Norton, M. E. , Stone, J. , Berghella, V. , Sciscione, A. C. , Tate, D. , & Schenone, M. H. (2015). Society for Maternal‐Fetal medicine (SMFM) clinical guideline #8: The fetus at risk for anemia—Diagnosis and management. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 212(6), 697–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM) , Norton, M. E. , Chauhan, S. P. , & Dashe, J. S. (2015). Society for Maternal‐Fetal medicine (SMFM) clinical guideline #7: Nonimmune hydrops fetalis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 212(2), 127–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suria, A. A. , Nurasyikin, Y. , Adibah, A. G. , Cheah, F. C. , & Leong, C. F. (2014). ABO incompatibility and glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency presenting as hydrops fetalis. La Clinica Terapeutica, 165(3), 151–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Troia, L. , Al‐Kouatly, H. B. , McCurdy, R. , Konchak, P. S. , Weiner, S. , & Berghella, V. (2019). The recurrence risk of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 45, 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J. , Xiao, Q. Z. , Chen, Y. M. , Sheng, Y. , Liu, D. , Liu, Y. H. , Zhang, C. M. , Wei, X. F. , Zhou, Y. Q. , Zhong, X. M. , Zhao, C. Y. , Xiong, F. , Wei, X. C. , & Xu, X. M. (2014). DNA hypermethylation and X chromosome inactivation are major determinants of phenotypic variation in women heterozygous for G6PD mutations. Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, 53, 214–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watchko, J. F. , Kaplan, M. , Stark, A. R. , Stevenson, D. K. , & Bhutani, V. K. (2013). Should we screen newborns for glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in the United States? Journal of Perinatology, 33, 499–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
