Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Bioresources and Bioprocessing logoLink to Bioresources and Bioprocessing
. 2024 Jul 20;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40643-024-00788-y

An experimental study on the curing of desert sand using bio-cement

Xiao Fu 1,✉, Wan-jun Ye 1
PMCID: PMC11264504  PMID: 39031294

Abstract

In order to promote the development and utilization of desert sand, this study is based on researching the most suitable ratio of bio-cement, analyzing the shear strength and permeability of improved desert sand by combining bio-cement and fly ash, and clarifying the applicability of tap water in bio-cement. The relationship between the two and the microstructural properties was investigated using the results of the straight shear test and the permeability test. The results showed that the urease solution prepared with tap water had a more pronounced temperature resistance. The urea concentration and the corresponding pH environment had a direct effect on the urease activity. The calcium carbonate yield was positively correlated with the calcium concentration, and the urea concentration was higher in the ranges of 1.0–1.5 mol/L. As the enzyme-to-gel ratio decreased, the calcium carbonate precipitate produced per unit volume of urease solution gradually converged to a certain value. The shear strength (increased by 37.9%) and permeability (decreased by about 8.9–68.5%) of the modified desert sand peaked with the increase in fly ash content. The microscopic test results indicated that the fly ash could provide nucleation sites for the bio-cement, effectively improving the mechanical properties of the desert sand. The crystal types of calcium carbonate in the modified desert sand were calcite and aragonite, which were the most stable crystal types. This study provides innovative ideas for interdisciplinary research in the fields of bioengineering, ecology and civil engineering.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40643-024-00788-y.

Keywords: Bio-cement, Tap water, Desert sand, Fly ash, Mechanical properties, Calcium carbonate precipitate

Introduction

Deserts occupy a vast area of distribution in the world, and prolonged drought and exposed desert terrain seriously endanger the major challenges of human survival and sustainable development, accelerating the deterioration of the ecological environment and leading to the destruction of vegetation cover, soil erosion and the reduction of arable land resources. At the same time, the frequency and intensity of sandstorms and dust storms have increased, limiting to a certain extent the rapid socio-economic development. According to statistics, the direct economic losses caused by the sand and dust storm problem are over 100 million per year. Natural disasters such as dust storms and sand dune flows have brought ecological green development to a standstill, reduced the area of usable arable land in the countryside, and triggered multifaceted problems such as traffic congestion in cities, erosion of highway beds and burial of road cover by dust, all of which are serious hazards to human production, life and health (Sun et al. 2021a; Nieć et al. 2014). Effective management and rational utilization of desert sand is necessary for sustainable development. At present, many engineers and researchers have conducted in-depth studies on the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of desert sand and have achieved remarkable results, proving the usability of desert sand. The rational use of desert sand has the following advantages: (1) Promoting the development of silicate materials to low-cost and green manufacturing; (2) Previous investigations have revealed that desert sand products (Li et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2020) have comparable or even superior performance to traditional products; (3) The rational use of desert sand is capable of saving mineral resources (Wang et al. 2019; Benmerioul et al. 2017); (4) Improving the living standards of the inhabitants of desert areas. It can be seen that the utilisation of desert sand is necessary and has a strong potential, and desert sand products have become valuable industrial products.

With the significant increase in global energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions, the development of carbon-neutral sustainable energy sources and methods is encouraged. In this context, how can the mechanical properties of desert sands be improved and rationally utilised using green and ecological methods? Traditional ideas of chemical remediation are limited and also have pollution risks for the surrounding environment, which do not meet the requirements of environmental friendliness (Tao et al. 2021). Currently, a new technology for inducing carbonate precipitation has provided a new idea for soil improvement, which causes calcium carbonate precipitation to fill the pores between soil particles and bond soil particles to form aggregates, thereby improving the soil strength (Meng et al. 2021; Ahenkorah et al. 2021b, c; Min et al. 2020). Bio-cement has been utilized in many practical situations, including improving the strength of sandy soils (Al Imran et al. 2021) and clay soils (Moghal et al. 2020a), reducing soil conductivity (Almajed et al. 2020), stabilizing wind erosion (Sun et al. 2021b), resisting rain erosion (Moghal et al. 2020b), and removing heavy metal ions (Almajed et al. 2019). However, the lack of nucleation sites is a recognized shortcoming of Bio-cement (Enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation, EICP) technology, which inevitably affects the soil improvement effect (Martin et al. 2021). In order to solve the problem of missing nucleation sites, researchers added additives to the improvement process to improve the overall improvement level of EICP (such as lignin, skimmed milk powder, and biopolymers (Sun et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2022; Arab et al. 2021)). As one of the main by-products of coal combustion, fly ash is an industrial waste that cannot be reused. However, in recent years, fly ash has attracted the attention of researchers. It has been successfully synthesized in cement, concrete aggregates, roadbed construction, and other materials (Cetin et al. 2012), or used as an adhesive for soil improvement (Ramdas et al. 2021; Tian et al. 2022). Therefore, it is meaningful to investigate whether fly ash can solve the problem of EICP missing nucleation sites, that is, can fly ash be employed to treat desert sand to be improved in this study? To what extent can the addition of fly ash improve the mechanical properties of desert sand by EICP? At the same time, EICP, as a bio-curing technology, should be able to clarify whether it can be promoted in practical applications, and further exploration and testing are needed. The main components involved in EICP include urease, urea (Inline graphic) and calcium chloride (Inline graphic). Equations (1) and (2) list the chemical reaction equations involved.

graphic file with name M3.gif 1
graphic file with name M4.gif 2

In the present work, a series of laboratory experiments were conducted in order to assess the effect of tap water as a solvent on bio-cement variables, calcium carbonate morphology, precipitation efficiency, sediment and precipitate properties. The aim is to highlight the applicability of tap water in bio-cement, and the substitution of tap water for deionised water will extend the range of applications for bio-cement, especially for practical engineering applications where the transport of deionised water results in additional costs. Shear strength and permeability tests were used to methodically derive the pattern of change in the mechanical parameters of the amended soil. In addition, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) test results were utilized to explain the mechanism of desert sand amelioration. The main work includes: firstly, the value of tap water in bio-cement was clarified, and the most suitable ratio of tap water as a solvent to prepare bio-cement under various influencing factors was investigated. Secondly, the characteristics of improved desert sand in terms of shear resistance and permeability were summarized. Finally, this work lays a certain research foundation for expanding the application scope and cost control of bio-cement in practical engineering, and also provides new ideas for interdisciplinary research between bioengineering, ecology and civil engineering.

Materials and methods

Desert sand (DS)

Desert sand is formed under the action of wind erosion. Its characteristics mainly include small particle size (generally less than 0.25 mm), high alkali content, and large impurity content, which do not meet the standard of building sand. The desert sand used in this study was obtained from Kubuqi, China (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Sand sampling site in the Kubuqi Desert

The sand in this area is very fine and free of impurities, and the main particle size is between 0.074 and 0.25 mm. Among various factors, d10, d30, d50, and d60 are obtained as 0.1, 0.15, 0.21, and 0.21, respectively, non-uniformity coefficient Cu=2.1, curvature coefficient Cc=1.07, and poor grading. In addition, the main physical and chemical properties have been presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Physical and chemical properties of the desert sand

Apparent density(g/cm3) Stacking density (g/cm3) Water content(%) Clay content(%) Fineness modulus Chloride content(%) Max dry density(g/cm3) Optimal moisture content(%)
2.655 1.560 0.28 0.40 0.72 0.017 1.767 12
Open in a new tab

Solutions

The solutions involved in this study include tap water, urease solution, urea solution, and calcium solution.

(1) Tap water. Basic indicators of tap water include pH 6.86, dissolved oxygen 10.99 mg/L, ammonia nitrogen 0.69 mg/L, and water hardness 142 mg/L.

(2) Urease solution. The urease used in this experiment was extracted from soybeans produced in Heilongjiang, China. After drying and grinding, soybeans were sieved by 0.150 mm to obtain soybean powder. Soybean powder and water were then appropriately mixed and stirred with an electromagnetic stirrer for 30 min. The mixture was transferred into a centrifuge tube by a pipette and centrifuged at 3000 r/min for 30 min. The filtrate can be filtered and collected, and the solution can also be allowed to stand for a while to collect the supernatant. The collected solution is soybean urease solution, and the extraction steps are illustrated in Fig. 2(a)-(e). The solution corresponds to the crude extract and should be kept in the refrigerator.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Preparation of the solution required for the test

(3) Cementing solution (CS). The cementing solution in this work consists of a urea solution and a calcium solution, wherein the calcium solution is provided by calcium chloride.

Fly ash (FA)

Fly ash is a product of coal combustion (Kotova et al. 2016). The appearance of fly ash is generally gray or blackish gray, and the higher the carbon content, the darker the color.

According to various origins and sources, the physical properties of fly ash could be also different. Its density mostly varies in the interval of 2.1–2.6 g/cm3, particle size range is 0.5–300 μm, specific surface varies in the interval of 0.2–0.4 m2/g, and porosity is usually between 60 and 70% (Querol et al. 1997). Herein, the used fly ash is the secondary fly ash of Henan Huifeng New Materials Co., Ltd., where the water demand is 94%, the bulk density is 2.5 g/cm3, and the detailed chemical compositions are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Chemical compositions of fly ash

Chemical component SiO2 Al2O3 CaO Fe2O3 MgO SO3 Other
Content(%) 50.40 27.45 6.73 5.90 2.72 2.9 3.9
Open in a new tab

Tube tests

The test-tube experiments in this work aimed to find out the most suitable proportion of bio-cement under various influencing factors (ambient temperature, pH, urease mass concentration, urea concentration, calcium concentration, gum-enzyme ratio, curing time).

Urease activity

(1) Urease concentration and temperature

In order to study the synergistic effect of urease concentration and temperature on urease activity (Whiffin et al. 2004), five different mass concentrations of urease solutions were prepared. Three ml of each concentration of urease solution was prepared and mixed with 27 ml of 1.0 mol/liter urea solution and then placed in a thermostatic incubator, set at different temperatures and kept at each temperature condition for 10 min before assessing the urease activity after monitoring the conductivity of each mixture using a conductivity meter.

(2) Urea concentration and pH

Urea concentration and pH also had a synergistic effect on urease activity. Eight different concentrations of urea solutions were prepared and the pH of each concentration of urea solution was adjusted to different levels of 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, and 11.0. Then 27 ml of each combination of urea solution was mixed with 3 ml of 100 g/L urease solution, tested for electrical conductivity and calculated for urease activity under room temperature conditions (28 ± 2 °C).

Calcium carbonate precipitation test tube

(1) Urease concentration

Urease solutions with mass concentrations of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 g/L were prepared. Each concentration of urease solution was mixed with 10 ml of cementing solutions with an equal volume, and the amount of calcium carbonate precipitation in each mixed solution was determined after 1d standing.

(2) Urea concentration

Twenty urea solutions with molar concentrations ranging from 0.1 mol/L to 2.0 mol/L were prepared and mixed with 1 mol/L calcium chloride solution in equal volume, and finally with urease solution, and the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated from each mixed solution was determined after 1d of standing.

(3) Calcium concentration

Eighteen types of calcium chloride solutions with different concentrations from 0.1 mol/L to 1.5 mol/L were prepared and eighteen types of calcium chloride solutions with different concentrations were mixed with 1 mol/L urea solution in equal volume to form eighteen types of urea solutions. In different cementing solutions, 10 ml of each cement solution was mixed with an equal volume of urease solution with a mass concentration of 100 g/L, and the amount of calcium carbonate precipitation in each mixed solution was determined after 1d standing.

(4) pH of the consolidating fluid

Three kinds of urease solutions with different concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mol/L were prepared, and mixed with calcium chloride solution in equal volume to form a cementing solution, and then each mixture was mixed with four kinds of cementing solutions with different pH values of 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0, respectively, and the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated in each mixture was determined after 1d of resting.

(5) Enzyme-glue ratio & curing time

The significance of enzyme-cement ratio is similar to the water-cement ratio in cementitious materials. In this study, we compared the calcium carbonate yield of different doses of urease solution reacted with the same concentration of cementing solution.

Meanwhile, a cementing solution with a concentration of 1 mol/L was prepared, and the same volume of cementing solution was mixed with urease solution, and then the amount of calcium carbonate precipitation after different curing days (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 d) was measured.

Each of the above influences was tested at room temperature (28 ± 2 °C). Except for “(4) pH of the consolidating fluid”, the effect of pH value was not considered.

Soil column tests

In this section, all samples were prepared using the mixing method. The solution ratios were selected by referring to “Sect. 2.4” to obtain the most suitable ratios.

(1) DST

The dimensions of the direct shear test specimens were 61.8 mm in diameter and 20 mm in height. To facilitate sample preparation and sample release, the sample preparation was carried out in a ring cutter with the bottom of the ring cutter sealed with plastic and the inner wall uniformly coated with petroleum jelly. The weight of the desert sand was 100 g and the pore volume was 38.78 cm3 (obtained by the volumetric method). Samples (labelled as F0) were prepared by mixing the consolidation solution and urease solution with desert sand at a solution volume 1.1 times the pore volume. Similarly, the same mass of desert sand was mixed with different amounts of FA (1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, 11% and 13%) to prepare samples (F1, F3, F5, F7, F9, F11 and F13). The desert sand, FA, cementing solution and urease solution were mixed homogeneously, compacted in layers, placed in moulds and removed after 7d of curing (see Fig. 3). The samples were subjected to DST tests at four stresses (i.e., 100, 200, 300, and 400 kPa) at a strain rate of 0.8 mm/min.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

A specimen subjected to a direct shear test

(2) PT and CCS

The variable head penetration test is utilized to test the water conductivity of the cured sample. For the same specimen, the head change and time are recorded at predetermined intervals, then the water level of the header pipe is raised to the required height and the water temperature at the outlet is measured, and after several consecutive measurements the header pipe water level is raised to the initial height, and so on for many times, and the average value is calculated as the final value of the specimen. At the same time, parallel samples were set for all samples. The dimensions of the penetration test specimen are 61.8 mm in diameter and 40 mm in height (The sample is prepared in the same way as for DST samples).

The amount of calcium carbonate precipitation in the sample after curing is an important parameter to evaluate the curing level. The sample is weighed after the DST test and weighed again after the pickling test. The difference in weight before and after pickling is the amount of calcium carbonate precipitation that is obtained by processing.

(3) XRD and SEM

To determine the distribution of calcium carbonate crystals and desert sand particles, a piece of solid sample was cut down and characterized by SEM. At the same time, an X-ray diffraction test was employed to assess the distribution of calcium carbonate after curing.

Experimental results

Tube tests

(1) Urease activity

Temperature affects the catalytic effect of the enzyme. Proper temperature control is able to maintain the high activity of the enzyme and thus raise the rate of the enzyme reaction. As illustrated in Fig. 4, as the temperature continues to increase, some “cuboids” will be missed, which indicates that the concentration of urease is deactivated at a certain temperature.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Urease activity subjected to various temperatures in the presence

It can be seen that the urease solution is temperature tolerant. The urease activity before inactivation was almost linearly related to urease concentration and temperature.

Figure 5 shows the trend of synergistic effect of pH and urea concentration on urease activity. The overall trend of urease activity was increasing and then decreasing and the optimum pH was obtained for different concentrations of urea solutions. However, for different concentrations of urea solutions, the optimum pH is 7 for concentrations in the range of 0.1 to 1.0 mol/L and 8 for concentrations greater than 1.0 mol/L.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Urease activity under the influence of various pH levels in the presence

Therefore, the appropriate urea concentration and urease concentration solution can be chosen according to the temperature and pH values of the actual engineering environment, which results in the best amount of urease activity, developing favorable conditions for improving the bio-cement curing level.

(2) Calcium carbonate precipitation

The theoretical value of calcium carbonate precipitation can be evaluated based on the following formula:

graphic file with name M5.gif 3

where C represents the concentration of cementing solution in moles per liter (mol/L), V is the volume of cementing solution in liters (L), and M denotes the molar mass of calcium carbonate (Neupane et al. 2013) which is equal to 100.09 g/mol.

(1) Urease concentration

The variation curve of calcium carbonate precipitation rate with urease concentration has been presented in Fig. 6. The plotted results indicate that the amount of calcium carbonate precipitation has a positive correlation with the mass concentration of urease. However, choosing the right mass concentration of urease is useful for cost control (100 g/L is more appropriate). The results also reveal that the urease concentration and the calcium carbonate precipitation rate can be evaluated in the following form:

graphic file with name M6.gif 4

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Relationship between precipitation rate of calcium carbonate and urease concentration

where Inline graphic represents the precipitation rate of calcium carbonate, w is the theoretical precipitation amount of calcium carbonate, and w is the actual precipitation amount of calcium carbonate.

(2) Urea concentration

The change of calcium carbonate precipitation as a function of the urea concentration is presented in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Calcium carbonate precipitation as a function of urea concentration

It can be seen from the figure that the amount of calcium carbonate precipitation increases linearly with the increase of urea concentration at 1.0 mol/L and the first precipitation peak is obtained at 1.0 mol/L concentration. As the concentration increased, the amount of calcium carbonate precipitation decreased in a small range, but the total amount of output remained more than 0.6 g. When the concentration of urea increased to 1.5 mol/L, the precipitation peak was obtained again and then decreased. It can be seen that the calcium carbonate precipitation is sufficiently desirable when the urea concentration is taken in the range of 1.0 mol/L to 1.5 mol/L.

(3) Calcium concentration

The trend of calcium carbonate precipitation under the influence of different calcium concentrations is shown in Fig. 8. There is no obvious peak in the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated due to different concentrations of calcium solution, and the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated is positively correlated with the concentration of calcium solution. Therefore, if we want to balance the cost and the ideal amount of calcium carbonate precipitation, it is more appropriate to control the concentration of calcium solution in the range of 1.0–1.5 mol/L, which is convenient for calculating and preparing the cementing fluid. Overall, the amount of calcium carbonate precipitation is essentially limited by the content (Trushina et al. 2016) (i.e., the content of urea in the cementing solution).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

Variation of calcium carbonate precipitation with in calcium concentration

(4) pH of the consolidating fluid

The amount of calcium carbonate precipitation of the cementing solution prepared by high, medium, and low concentrations of urea solution under different pH conditions is shown in Fig. 9. The results indicate that there are peaks of calcium carbonate precipitation in three concentrations of cementing solution subjected to various pH conditions and the optimal pH value corresponding to each peak is different. The optimal pH value of the cementing solution with a concentration of 0.5 mol/L and 1.0 mol/L is 7.0, and the optimal pH value of the cementing solution with a concentration of 1.5 mol/L is 8.0. This finding also confirms the test results given in “Sect. 3.1”.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Open in a new tab

Effect of pH on the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated

Therefore, it is necessary to consider the concentration of urea when setting the pH value of the cementing solution. When the concentration of urea is less than or equal to 1.0 mol/L, the pH value of 7.0 is more suitable. When the concentration of urea is greater than 1.0 mol/L, the pH value of 8.0 is more suitable. In practical engineering, the synergistic effect of the solution concentration with the ambient pH of the soil to be treated should be taken into account and the solution pH should be adjusted to obtain satisfactory settling values.

(5) Enzyme-glue ratio and reaction time

By examining the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated per unit volume of urease solution (see Fig. 10), it can be seen that the amount of calcium carbonate produced per unit volume of urea solution decreases considerably at enzyme-to-glue ratios of 0.2 and 0.3.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Open in a new tab

Effect of the enzyme ratio on the precipitation of calcium carbonate

By increasing the enzyme-gel ratio, the calcium carbonate yield per unit volume of urease solution decreases from a low enzyme-gel ratio to a high enzyme-gel ratio and gradually converges to a certain value. The enzyme-cement ratio in bio-cement is similar in significance to the water-cement ratio in concrete and is an important indicator of performance. It is clear from these results that blindly increasing the amount of urease does not increase the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated per unit volume of urease solution. The production of calcium carbonate under different reaction time conditions is shown in Fig. 10, where it can be seen that increasing the curing time promotes the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated, thus favouring the curing level. In the presence of calcium ions, more calcium carbonate precipitation is produced with time, i.e., the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated is positively correlated with the reaction time.

(6) Optimum ratio

The most suitable ratios of tap water as solvent under multifactorial conditions are presented in Table 3. It can be seen that the prepared urease solution showed good activity as well as the change rule under the influence of various factors. In conclusion, tap water can be used instead of deionised water in the bio-cement curing process, which extends the application of bio-cement curing technology to a certain extent.

Table 3.

The optimal combination under multifactorial conditions

Urease activity test Calcium carbonate precipitation test
Temperature and tolerance pH value (Urea concentration) Urea concentrations Calcium concentration pH value of cementing fluid Enzyme glue ratio
30℃(Strong)

pH = 7(0.5–1.0 mol/L)

pH = 8(1.5 mol/L)

 1.0 ~ 1.5(mol/L) Linear growth

pH = 7(≤ 1.0 mol/L)

pH = 8(>1.0 mol/L)

 0.2–0.3
Open in a new tab

(3) Solidification level with fly ash addition

In this section, the most suitable ratio for preparing the sample is obtained through the above test, that is, 1 mol/L urea solution and 1 mol/L calcium chloride solution are made as a cementing solution and the pH value of the solution is set equal to 7. A mass concentration of urease solution of 100 g/L is considered; the ambient temperature is controlled at 30 °C (± 2 °C), which is the sample curing temperature. It is worth mentioning that all the stages of soil sample preparation in this article have been completely performed by the replacement of deionized water with tap water.

(4) Shear stress-displacement relationship

The direct shear test results of desert sand samples treated with EICP-FA are illustrated in Fig. 11. This figure shows the change response of desert sand samples after mixing subjected to four normal stresses (i.e., 100, 200, 300, and 400 kPa) during the shearing process. In all normal stress conditions, the shear stress level of the sample after mixing is higher than the undoped sample, and with the increase in content, the shear strength level also increases in the same proportion. This result can be attributed to the friction of the sample under the action of a higher-pressure limit, and the contribution of the shear strength is dominant.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Open in a new tab

Shear stress-shear displacement curves in the presence of various FA dosages and vertical pressures

Meanwhile, desert sand, fly ash, and calcium carbonate contribute to cementing each other to form aggregates, preventing the movement of desert sand particles, which promotes the bite force and friction force. The highest peak shear strength (F7) was 37.9% higher than that of the unadded admixture sample (F0).

The smoothness of the shear stress-strain curve in the figure also indicates the roughness of the shear surface of the sample. It should be noted that when the amount of fly ash is more than 9% (226.37 kPa), the shear strength of the sample is significantly lower than the sample mixed with 7% (243.51 kPa) fly ash. It should be noted that the shear strength values of the desert sand without added fly ash and at the same time without bio-cement under four normal pressures are 45.12 kPa, 79.81 kPa, 101.45 kPa and 125.65 kPa, with cohesion of 0 and internal friction angle of 18.26°, respectively. All the data sets, including the friction angle, are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4.

Change in cohesion and angle of internal friction with dosage

Dosages/% σ/ kPa τpeak/ kPa cpeak ϕpeak/ ° Dosages/% σ/ kPa τpeak/ kPa cpeak ϕpeak/ °
0 100 64.08 10.21 20.97 7 100 94.2 41.78 35.60
200 100.45 200 138.58
300 163.41 300 188.4
400 208.58 400 243.51
1 100 64.4 13.96 24.19 9 100 92.92 39.07 33.51
200 103.97 200 133.45
300 170.94 300 186.96
400 220.76 400 226.37
3 100 66.8 20.13 29.08 11 100 75.46 38.34 33.91
200 115.19 200 130.57
300 177.5 300 185.03
400 228.77 400 219.48
5 100 67.45 29.63 32.50 13 100 74.01 38.66 33.41
200 125.28 200 126.56
300 180.39 300 183.59
400 223 400 219.8
Open in a new tab

This phenomenon of low shear strength in the presence of high fly ash content is due to excessive distribution of fine particles in the sample, which makes calcium carbonate fairly unable to form effective cementation between particles (Tian et al. 2022). Therefore, excessive fly ash content causes the sample to lose some of its strength. If obtaining a high-strength sample is of main purpose, the content should be appropriately controlled. In this research work, the amount of fly ash of 7% is able to achieve the goal of improving the shear strength of the sample.

(5) Permeability

Figure 12 shows the permeability and precipitation rate of calcium carbonate in the presence of different dosage conditions. The permeability coefficients of the EICP-FA treated desert sand samples ranged from 6.01 × 10− 4 to 17.4 × 10− 4 cm/s. The permeability coefficients decreased by 8.9–68.5% compared to the samples without added fly ash (19.1 × 10− 4 cm/s), with a decreasing trend with increasing calcium carbonate precipitation. It is worth noting that the permeability coefficient of desert sand without the addition of fly ash and also without the addition of bio-cement is 22.5 × 10− 4 cm/s.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Open in a new tab

Permeability coefficient and calcium carbonate precipitation after solidification

The changing trend of calcium carbonate precipitation was opposite to the trend of permeability coefficient. The calcium carbonate content of the EICP-FA treated samples increased by 72.7% compared to the samples treated without additives.

(6) Microstructures

The samples used for microdetection were taken from the post-damage specimens of the straight shear test, where an admixture doping of 7% was used for microstructural testing of the EICP-FA modified desert sand. Through scanning electron microscope images of the cured samples, it can be seen that calcium carbonate precipitate is formed (see Fig. 13), revealing the difference between EICP and EICP-FA treated samples. The calcium carbonate of the EICP-treated samples is only dispersed on the surface of the soil particles or a small amount is distributed between the soil particles (see Fig. 13(a)-(c)).

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Open in a new tab

SEM-EDS images of soil particles after EICP and EICP combined with fly ash treatment

After EICP-FA treatment, the agglomeration of calcium carbonate crystals appeared in the samples and the aggregates were densely distributed (see Fig. 13(e)-(g)). The distribution of calcium carbonate obtained by EICP-FA was wider than that of EICP, and the particle size of calcium carbonate crystals was relatively small. This is because the more viscous the solution, the smaller the particle size of the calcium carbonate crystals (Nemati et al. 2005). The yellow and green rounded particles shown in Fig. 13 are all precipitates from biomineralisation, i.e. calcium carbonate crystals, where the yellow calcium carbonate crystals encapsulate the soil particles and form an accumulator, and the green calcium carbonate crystals act as a bridge at the soil particles. FA is marked in purple.

Figure 13(d) and (h) show the elemental spectra of the bio-cement treated samples after energy spectroscopy, with each peak in the spectrum indicating the relative concentration of the element. The main chemical compositions of the FA include O, Si, and small amounts of Ca (Table 2). Samples treated with EICP-FA contained silica compared to specimens modified only with bio-cement.

Therefore, the contribution of FA and cementing fluid flow is capable of increasing the contact area between desert sand particles, providing nucleation sites for calcium carbonate, and then compensating for the shortcomings of EICP technology. On the other hand, this also explains why the DST and permeability resistance of the sample after EICP-FA treatment is superior to EICP. When the sample becomes dehydrated and hardened, the particles wrapped in the cementing fluid interact more closely, which is reflected in the improvement of the UCS and permeability resistance.

XRD is an efficient tool commonly used to identify and distinguish a variety of minerals (Nafisi et al. 2019), and the peaks and intensities of various types of calcium carbonate crystals, such as vaterite, calcite, and aragonite (Oral et al. 2018). The achieved results revealed that calcium carbonate crystals appeared in the samples treated with EICP and EICP-FA (see Fig. 14). The maximum strength of calcium carbonate crystals formed in the samples treated with EICP-FA was higher than that of the samples treated with EICP alone, indicating a higher content of calcium carbonate. Further comparative analysis showed that, compared to the samples treated with EICP alone, the diffraction peaks in the samples treated with EICP-FA were substantially increased, indicating that EICP-FA produced a large amount of calcite. Such a fact essentially explains why the strength of the samples after adding FA is higher than that of the FA-free samples.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

Open in a new tab

SEM images of soil particles after EICP and EICP-FA treatment

As shown in Fig. 14(a), the main mineral compositions of EICP are calcium carbonate and quartz, and the generated calcium carbonate mainly consists of vaterite and calcite, accounting for 3.18% and 5.91%, respectively. As shown in Fig. 14(b), the main mineral composition and generated calcium carbonate of EICP-FA are consistent with that of EICP, in which the generated vaterite and calcite account for 2.39% and 8.67%, respectively.

Discussion

Herein, the possibility of improving desert sand through simple mixing and compaction, without the need for a bioreactor, was thoroughly examined and proved. In addition, the value of the cost minimization parameter was determined. The use of soya flour as a source of urease has been reported to be more economical than commercial urease, which is expensive (20 euros per gram, based on indicative prices from commercial suppliers for 2021) and uneconomical especially for large-scale practical engineering applications (Isaac et al. 2021). If commercial urease is used, it will be the most expensive component of the chemicals used in bio-cement. Furthermore, the use of plant urease is able to avoid the limitations of oxygen input involved in MICP bacterial urease and makes EICP-FA more practical. According to the test results, the success of EICP-FA in improving desert sands is mainly attributed to the following aspects:

(1) In general, there is no direct relationship between soil permeability and strength, but both are affected by pore filling. The denser the filling, the worse the water and air permeability of the soil, and the stronger the anti-permeability. When the particle arrangement is reorganized when disturbed by external forces, the spatial change is small and the contact surface between particles is large, resulting in high shear strength. Pore filling in bio-cement amended soils is achieved by the continuous accumulation and bridging of calcium carbonate. The results of anti-permeability and SEM are proof of this process, soil porosity has a great influence on its resistance in soil. Therefore, reducing pores in samples treated with EICP-FA is one of the reasons for increasing its strength. Losini (Losini et al. 2021) investigated the effects of natural additives and biopolymers on soil structure and found that both natural additives and biopolymers are capable of improving the internal pore structure of the soil, which influences the thermal conductivity, infiltration properties, and mechanical properties.

(2) The presence of FA powder provides nucleation sites that promote the growth of calcium carbonate crystals and provide better binding between soil particles. On the one hand, the generated calcium carbonate crystals are spheres with smooth surfaces, while the fly ash particles have loose and porous surfaces with strong adsorption (Fig. 15(b)), which facilitates nucleation due to greater friction with the calcium carbonate crystals. On the other hand, Ca2+ in the solution is preferentially adsorbed to the fly ash surface, and carbon dioxide hydrolysis generates CO32− which immediately combines with Ca2+ on the fly ash surface, crystallising on the fly ash surface to generate a homogeneous cladding layer. Because there are silicon-oxygen bonds on the surface of FA, they become sites for the adsorption of calcium carbonate crystals. At the same time, the silicon-oxygen bonds have a strong polar effect. They produce polarization when exposed to water and are negatively charged, adsorbing calcium ions and other cations (Bayat et al. 2002). When the Ca2+ adsorbed on the surface of fly ash reaches saturation, there are a lot of free Ca2+ in the solution combined with CO32− to generate free calcium carbonate crystals and continue to increase in the formation of stacking, i.e., the occurrence of non-uniform nucleation, thus forming a “bridge” between the desert sand and fly ash. If the concentration of calcium solution in the cement is high enough, after mixing with fly ash, the concentration of reactants is also high, which leads to a certain degree of inhibition of hydrolysis, calcium carbonate crystals generated by the accumulation of obstacles, calcium carbonate crystals between the phenomenon of “wrapping”, the formation of “agglomerates “, this makes the EICP-FA solution is more viscous after mixing with fly ash.

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15

Open in a new tab

Curing mechanism diagrams for: (a) EICP, (b) EICP-FA

(3) The integrity and stability of the desert sand was ultimately enhanced by the addition of FA to the EICP cementing fluid. Evaporating during the moisture curing process, the dehydration process increases the bond strength and brings the particles closer together, thus compressing the pore space (see Fig. 15). Having shorter bonding chains makes them more resistant to external forces, so geotechnical properties are improved during the drying process. The resulting consolidation fluid binds the desert sand together, forming a strong structure and increasing cohesion, thus improving the mechanical properties of the desert sand. Apart from fly ash, there are other admixtures used for nucleation, including skimmed milk powder (Martin et al. 2021), brown sugar, glutinous rice flour, xanthan gum (Wu et al. 2020; Tariq et al. 2022), lignin (Zhang et al. 2022), sodium-based montmorillonite (Yuan et al. 2022), guar gum (Hamdan et al. 2016), biopolymers (Refaei et al. 2020), polychitosan (Nawarathna et al. 2019), and others.

Conclusions

In this work, a novel approach of bio-cement (Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation, EICP) combined with fly ash (FA) is used to improve the shear strength and permeability of desert sand. Here, FA is regarded as an environmentally friendly waste recycling material and is synergistically improved with bio-cement, which provides a good idea for the cross research and application of bioengineering with ecology and civil engineering. We used tap water as a solvent to prepare all the solutions and analyzed the most suitable ratio of bio-cement under the influence of multiple factors. The successful application of tap water in bio-cement and the quantitative results of the in-house direct shear test and permeability test point the way for the application of desert sand in infrastructure engineering. The main results are summarized as follows:

(1) A new improvement method, EICP-FA, was applied and proved to enhance the shear strength and permeability of desert sand better than that treated with EICP only. EICP-FA is environmentally friendly and highly efficient, and it has a special application prospect in the utilization of desert sand and infrastructure construction in desert areas.

(2) The urease solution prepared with tap water is highly temperature resistant. The optimum pH was 7.0 at urease solution concentrations of 0.1 to 1.0 mol/L. At concentrations greater than 1.0 mol/L, the optimum pH was 8.0, which was related to the precipitation process of calcium carbonate in cementing solutions of different pH values. The precipitation amount of calcium carbonate was positively correlated with the mass concentration of urease solution, urea concentration, calcium concentration and reaction time. The concentration of urease can be controlled in the range of 1.0–1.5 mol/L to achieve the desired amount of precipitation. A calcium concentration range of 1.0–1.5 mol/L is desirable. The enzyme-gel ratio continued to increase as the amount of calcium carbonate produced per unit volume of urease solution gradually approached a value from low to high. Tap water treatment is more effective in reducing costs (Martin et al. 2020).

(3) The effect of increasing common parameters such as shear strength and water permeability was studied in depth. Both shear strength and permeability coefficient showed an increasing and then decreasing trend with the increase of fly ash dosage. The optimum value occurs at a fly ash content of about 7%. Specifically, the highest peak shear strength increased by 37.9%, the permeability coefficient decreased by 8.9 -68.5%, and the calcium carbonate content increased by 72.7% as compared to the samples without additives.

(4) The microstructure analysis revealed that the distribution of calcium carbonate in EICP-treated desert sand was irregular. However, the addition of FA provided nucleation sites for calcium carbonate crystal aggregation, which was beneficial for improving the mechanical properties of desert sand. The XRD-based analysis indicated that the crystalline form of calcium carbonate was calcite and aragonite in the EICP-FA treated desert sand, which was the most stable crystalline form.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (122.9KB, jpg)

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

Xiao Fu: investigation, data organization, visualization, formal analysis, writing-original draft, conceptualization, methodology, draft, conceptualization, methodology. Wan-jun Ye: data organization, visualization, supervision, methodology, mentoring, writing-review, editing, funding acquisition.

Funding

The work reported in this paper was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 42372323 and 42072319).

Data availability

The data will be available on the reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval and consent for participation

This article does not cover human and / or animal studies.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents competing interests in connection with the work submitted.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Ahenkorah I, Rahman MM, Karim MR, Beecham S (2021a) Enzyme induced calcium carbonate precipitation and its engineering application: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Constr Build Mater 308:125000. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125000 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125000 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahenkorah I, Rahman MM, Karim MR, Beecham S, Saint C (2021b) A review of enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP): the role of enzyme kinetics. Sustainable Chem 2(1):92–114. 10.3390/suschem2010007 10.3390/suschem2010007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahenkorah I, Rahman MM, Karim MR, Beecham S (2021c) Optimisation of chemical constituents on enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation in test-tube and soil. Geotech Res 8(3):66–84. 10.1680/jgere.21.00006 10.1680/jgere.21.00006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al Imran M, Nakashima K, Evelpidou N, Kawasaki S, improvement of using crude extract urease from watermelon seeds for biocementation technology (2021) Geomate J 20(78):142–147. 10.21660/2021.78.GX180 10.21660/2021.78.GX180 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Almajed A, Tirkolaei HK, Kavazanjian E, Hamdan N (2019) Enzyme induced biocementated sand with high strength at low carbonate content. Sci Rep 9:1135. 10.1038/s41598-018-38361-1 10.1038/s41598-018-38361-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Almajed A, Lemboye K, Arab MG, Alnuaim A (2020) Mitigating wind erosion of sand using biopolymer-assisted EICP technique. Soils Found 60(2):356–371. 10.1016/j.sandf.2020.02.011 10.1016/j.sandf.2020.02.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arab MG, Omar M, Almajed A, Elbaz Y, Ahmed AH (2021) Hybrid technique to produce bio-bricks using enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) and sodium alginate biopolymer. Constr Build Mater 284:122846. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122846 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bayat B (2002) Combined removal of zinc (II) and cadmium (II) from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto high-calcium Turkish fly ash. Water Air Soil Pollut 136:69–92. 10.1023/A:1015296032528 10.1023/A:1015296032528 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Benmerioul F, Makani A, Tafraoui A, Zaouai S (2017) Valorization of the crushed dune sand in the Formulation of Self-compacting-concrete. Procedia Eng 171:672–678. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.408 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.408 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cetin B, Aydilek AH, Li L (2012) Experimental and numerical analysis of metal leaching from fly ash-amended highway bases. Waste Manag 32(5):965–978. 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.12.012 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamdan N, Zhao Z, Mujica M, Kavazanjian E Jr, He X (2016) Hydrogel-assisted enzyme-induced carbonate mineral precipitation. J Mater Civ Eng 28(10):04016089. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001604 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001604 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Imran MA, Nakashima K, Kawasaki S (2021) Bio-mediated soil improvement using plant derived enzyme in addition to magnesium ion. Crystals 11(5):516. 10.3390/cryst11050516 10.3390/cryst11050516 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kotova OB, Shabalin IN, Shushkov DA, Kocheva LS (2016) Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites from coal fly ash. Adv Appl Ceram 115(3):152–157. 10.1179/1743676115Y.0000000063 10.1179/1743676115Y.0000000063 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li Y, Zhang H, Liu G, Hu D, Ma X (2020) Multi-scale study on mechanical property and strength prediction of aeolian sand concrete. Constr Build Mater 247:118538. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118538 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118538 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu H, Chen X, Che J, Liu N, Zhang M (2020) Mechanical performances of concrete produced with desert sand after elevated temperature. Int J Concrete Struct Mater 14:1–15. 10.1186/s40069-020-00402-3 10.1186/s40069-020-00402-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Losini AE, Grillet AC, Bellotto M, Woloszyn M, Dotelli G (2021) Natural additives and biopolymers for raw earth construction stabilization–a review. Constr Build Mater 304:124507. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124507 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124507 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin KK, Khodadadi TH, Kavazanjian E Jr (2020) February) enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation: scale-up of bio-cemented soil columns. Geo-Congress 2020. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 96–103 [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin K, Tirkolaei HK, Kavazanjian E (2021) Enhancing the strength of granular material with a modified enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) treatment solution. Constr Build Mater 271:121529. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121529 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121529 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meng H, Shu S, Gao Y, Yan B, He J (2021) Multiple-phase enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) method for soil improvement. Eng Geol 294:106374. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106374 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106374 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Min WU, Yu-feng G A O, Jia HE, Yang LIU (2020) Laboratory study on use of soybean urease-induced calcium carbonate precipitation with xanthan gum for stabilization of desert sand against wind erosion. Chin J Geotech Eng 42(10):1914–1921. 10.11779/CJGE202010017 10.11779/CJGE202010017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moghal AAB, Lateef MA, Mohammed SAS, Lemboye K, CS Chittoori B, Almajed A (2020) Efficacy of enzymatically induced calcium carbonate precipitation in the retention of heavy metal ions. Sustainability 12(17):7019. 10.3390/su12177019 10.3390/su12177019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Moghal AAB, Lateef MA, Abu Sayeed Mohammed S, Ahmad M, Usman AR, Almajed A (2020a) Heavy metal immobilization studies and enhancement in geotechnical properties of cohesive soils by EICP technique. Appl Sci 10(21):7568. 10.3390/app10217568 10.3390/app10217568 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nafisi A, Safavizadeh S, Montoya BM (2019) Influence of microbe and enzyme-induced treatments on cemented sand shear response. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 145(9): 06019008.https://doi.org10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002111
  24. Nawarathna THK, Nakashima K, Kawasaki S (2019) Chitosan enhances calcium carbonate precipitation and solidification mediated by bacteria. Int J Biol Macromol 133:867–874. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.172 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nemati M, Greene EA, Voordouw G (2005) Permeability profile modification using bacterially formed calcium carbonate: comparison with enzymic option. Process Biochem 40(2):925–933. 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.02.019 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.02.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Neupane D, Yasuhara H, Kinoshita N, Unno T (2013) Applicability of enzymatic calcium carbonate precipitation as a soil-strengthening technique. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 139(12):2201–2211. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000959 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000959 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nieć M, Galos K, Szamałek K (2014) Main challenges of mineral resources policy of Poland. Resour Policy 42:93–103. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.010 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oral ÇM, Ercan B (2018) Influence of pH on morphology, size and polymorph of room temperature synthesized calcium carbonate particles. Powder Technol 339:781–788. 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.08.066 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.08.066 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Querol X, Plana F, Alastuey A, López-Soler A (1997) Synthesis of Na-zeolites from fly ash. Fuel 76(8):793–799. 10.1016/S0016-2361(96)00188-3 10.1016/S0016-2361(96)00188-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ramdas VM, Mandree P, Mgangira M, Mukaratirwa S, Lalloo R, Ramchuran S (2021) Review of current and future bio-based stabilisation products (enzymatic and polymeric) for road construction materials. Transp Geotechnics 27:100458. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100458 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100458 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Refaei M, Arab MG, Omar M (2020) February) Sandy soil improvement through biopolymer assisted EICP. Geo-Congress 2020. American Society of Civil Engineers., Reston, VA, pp 612–619. 10.1061/9780784482780.06 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun X, Miao L, Yuan J, Wang H, Wu L (2021) Application of enzymatic calcification for dust control and rainfall erosion resistance improvement. Sci Total Environ 759:143468. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143468 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun X, Liu Y, Guo S, Wang Y, Zhang B (2021a) Interregional supply chains of Chinese mineral resource requirements. J Clean Prod 279:123514. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123514 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123514 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sun Y, Zhong X, Lv J, Wang G, Hu R (2023) Experimental study on different improvement schemes of EICP-Lignin solidified silt. Materials 16(3):999. 10.3390/ma16030999 10.3390/ma16030999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tao G, Yuan J, Chen Q, Peng W, Yu R, Basack S (2021) Chemical stabilization of calcareous sand by polyurethane foam adhesive. Constr Build Mater 295:123609. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123609 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123609 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tariq Z, Mahmoud M, Alahmari M, Bataweel M, Mohsen A (2022) Lost circulation mitigation using modified enzyme induced calcite precipitation technique. J Petrol Sci Eng 210:110043. 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.110043 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.110043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tian Z, Tang X, Xiu Z, Zhou H, Xue Z (2022) The mechanical properties improvement of environmentally friendly fly ash-based geopolymer mortar using bio-mineralization. J Clean Prod 332:130020. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130020 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Trushina DB, Bukreeva TV, Antipina MN (2016) Size-controlled synthesis of vaterite calcium carbonate by the mixing method: aiming for nanosized particles. Cryst Growth Des 16(3):1311–1319. 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01422 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01422 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang J, Ou Z, Liu J, Xiong Z, Wang J, Wang Y, Luo W, Liu Y (2019), July Study on durability of ultra high performances concrete with aeolian sand. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 300, No. 2, p. 022017). IOP Publishing.10.1088/1755-1315/300/2/022017
  40. Whiffin VS (2004) Microbial CaCO3 precipitation for the production of biocement (Doctoral dissertation, Murdoch University)
  41. Yuan H, Liu K, Zhang C, Zhao Z (2022) Mechanical properties of Na-montmorillonite-modified EICP-treated silty sand. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–13. 10.1007/s11356-021-16442-5 [DOI] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang J, Wang X, Shi L, Yin Y (2022) Enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) combined with lignin to solidify silt in the Yellow River flood area. Constr Build Mater 339:127792. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127792 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127792 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (122.9KB, jpg)

Data Availability Statement

The data will be available on the reasonable request.

Articles from Bioresources and Bioprocessing are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES