Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2024 Jun 28;9(7):e00314-24. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00314-24

Diverse and unconventional methanogens, methanotrophs, and methylotrophs in metagenome-assembled genomes from subsurface sediments of the Slate River floodplain, Crested Butte, CO, USA

Anna N Rasmussen 1,2, Bradley B Tolar 1,2, John R Bargar 3, Kristin Boye 2, Christopher A Francis 1,4,
Editor: Jingjing Peng5
PMCID: PMC11264602  PMID: 38940520

ABSTRACT

We use metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) to understand single-carbon (C1) compound-cycling—particularly methane-cycling—microorganisms in montane riparian floodplain sediments. We generated 1,233 MAGs (>50% completeness and <10% contamination) from 50- to 150-cm depth below the sediment surface capturing the transition between oxic, unsaturated sediments and anoxic, saturated sediments in the Slate River (SR) floodplain (Crested Butte, CO, USA). We recovered genomes of putative methanogens, methanotrophs, and methylotrophs (n = 57). Methanogens, found only in deep, anoxic depths at SR, originate from three different clades (Methanoregulaceae, Methanotrichaceae, and Methanomassiliicoccales), each with a different methanogenesis pathway; putative methanotrophic MAGs originate from within the Archaea (Candidatus Methanoperedens) in anoxic depths and uncultured bacteria (Ca. Binatia) in oxic depths. Genomes for canonical aerobic methanotrophs were not recovered. Ca. Methanoperedens were exceptionally abundant (~1,400× coverage, >50% abundance in the MAG library) in one sample that also contained aceticlastic methanogens, indicating a potential C1/methane-cycling hotspot. Ca. Methylomirabilis MAGs from SR encode pathways for methylotrophy but do not harbor methane monooxygenase or nitrogen reduction genes. Comparative genomic analysis supports that one clade within the Ca. Methylomirabilis genus is not methanotrophic. The genetic potential for methylotrophy was widespread, with over 10% and 19% of SR MAGs encoding a methanol dehydrogenase or substrate-specific methyltransferase, respectively. MAGs from uncultured Thermoplasmata archaea in the Ca. Gimiplasmatales (UBA10834) contain pathways that may allow for anaerobic methylotrophic acetogenesis. Overall, MAGs from SR floodplain sediments reveal a potential for methane production and consumption in the system and a robust potential for methylotrophy.

IMPORTANCE

The cycling of carbon by microorganisms in subsurface environments is of particular relevance in the face of global climate change. Riparian floodplain sediments contain high organic carbon that can be degraded into C1 compounds such as methane, methanol, and methylamines, the fate of which depends on the microbial metabolisms present as well as the hydrological conditions and availability of oxygen. In the present study, we generated over 1,000 MAGs from subsurface sediments from a montane river floodplain and recovered genomes for microorganisms that are capable of producing and consuming methane and other C1 compounds, highlighting a robust potential for C1 cycling in subsurface sediments both with and without oxygen. Archaea from the Ca. Methanoperedens genus were exceptionally abundant in one sample, indicating a potential C1/methane-cycling hotspot in the Slate River floodplain system.

KEYWORDS: subsurface, carbon, methane, metagenome-assembled genomes, floodplain

INTRODUCTION

Riparian floodplains are productive and dynamic systems that contain high organic carbon (OC) and can be hotspots for geochemical cycling due to hydrological fluctuations. The OC within floodplains can be degraded through several mechanisms as floodplains may contain both oxic and anoxic sediments, depending on the hydrological conditions, thus producing a suite of low-molecular-weight and single-carbon (C1) compounds. These C1 compounds can have many fates, including being reduced to methane through methanogenesis or being oxidized through methylotrophy, which is defined as the ability to utilize C1 compounds (e.g., methane, methanol, and methylamine) as the sole carbon and energy source. When methane is the C1 compound that is oxidized, it is referred to specifically as methanotrophy. C1 generation and consumption are evolutionarily linked through the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway (WLP) (1).

Our understanding of the metabolic pathways and microorganisms responsible for both methanogenesis and methanotrophy is continually expanding, in large part due to the increasing sequencing of environmental samples. Methanogens are capable of reducing C1 compounds to methane gas through one of several different pathways, including using hydrogen (H2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) (hydrogenotrophic), acetate (aceticlastic), or other C1/methylated compounds (methylotrophic or hydrogen-dependent methylotrophic) [reviewed in reference (2)]. Methanogens are predominantly found within Euryarchaeota (Halobacterota and Thermoplasmatota) (3, 4) but have also been recently described in the Candidatus Bathyarchaeia (formerly Bathyarchaea, now in the Thermoproteota) (5) and Verstraetearchaea (6).

Our understanding of methanotrophy has expanded in recent years with methanotrophs now generally being divided into two groups, aerobic and anaerobic, based on their electron acceptors. Aerobic methanotrophs are found in the bacterial phyla Proteobacteria (7) and Verrucomicrobia (8, 9). Anaerobic methanotrophs include bacteria (10, 11), bacterial/archaeal consortia (12, 13), and archaea in the genus Candidatus Methanoperedens, which are capable of using various electron acceptors (1417). Additionally, putative methanotrophy has been uncovered within the uncultivated bacterial lineage, Candidatus Binatia (formerly Binatota) (18). Methanotrophy requires a method for activating methane, either aerobically through a particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO) or soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) enzyme or anaerobically through reverse methanogenesis. Activated methane can then enter several specialized methylotrophy pathways for carbon oxidation and assimilation that include methanol dehydrogenases, formaldehyde oxidation pathways, and formate dehydrogenases (19). Anaerobic methylotrophy can be carried out using three-component, corrinoid-dependent methyltransferase systems consisting of a substrate-specific methyltransferase (mtxB), a corrinoid-binding protein (mtxC), and a carbon-carrier methyltransferase (mtxA), with methanogens also using a reductive activase (ramA) (2, 20). These methyltransferase systems act on methylated compounds such as methanol, methoxylated compounds, methylamines, methylsulfides, and methanethiols. There are several different enzymes and pathways capable of carrying out each step in both the carbon oxidation and carbon assimilation required for methylotrophy, with many methylotrophs encoding some level of redundancy in carbon assimilation through either the ribulose monophosphate (RuMP), serine cycle and tetrahydrofolate pathway, or Calvin cycle (21), adding to the complexity of C1 cycling.

Here we use metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) to assess the genetic potential of microorganisms for methane cycling and broader methylotrophy in the Slate River (SR) floodplain. SR is a mountainous, high-elevation river located near Crested Butte (Gunnison County, CO, USA) and impacted by legacy mine activities for silver, lead, and zinc. The SR floodplain experiences seasonal rise and fall in the water table related to snowmelt-induced flooding, precipitation, and evapotranspiration. These fluctuations in the water table determine the inputs of nutrients and other substances to the subsurface and oxygen penetration depth, thus strongly influencing microbial communities and biogeochemical cycling. For example, water table height impacts lead speciation (22), iron-colloid composition (23), and zinc mobilization in the SR floodplain (24). Of particular relevance, the SR floodplain contains an oxic-anoxic interface within the fine-grained layer defined by the water table depth. We sampled six depths from 50 to 150 cm below sediment surface, capturing this transition between oxic and anoxic sediments in mid-June of 2018 when the water table height started to decline after reaching a peak in early June. During the sampling season (May–October 2018), water table height ranged from a peak in May of ~30 cm down to 105 cm in August then back up to ~50 cm in October (22). Seasonal variations in hydrology impacted porewater redox conditions throughout the sediment column. However, oxic conditions generally dominated above 90-cm depth and anoxic conditions below 110-cm depth, with redox conditions transitioning between 90 and 110 cm and seasonal, transient saturation occurring above 90 cm during high water conditions (22).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In total from the two locations and six different depths within the SR floodplain, we recovered 1,233 MAGs of >50% completeness and <10% contamination, spanning 38 different phyla based on the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) taxonomy. We refer to MAGs based on their GTDB taxonomy throughout the text and reference former taxonomic names when relevant. The MAG library includes 135 archaeal MAGs and 1,098 bacterial MAGs, with the most MAGs originating from Acidobacteriota (n = 239), Chloroflexota (n = 148), and Proteobacteria (n = 157) (Fig. S1). After dereplication at 98% average nucleotide identity (ANI), the data set consisted of 683 representative MAGs. The dereplicated MAG library recruited between 13.2% and 38.3% of metagenomic reads in a sample (Table S1).

Even at the coarse level of phylum, we observed variations in the abundance of MAGs with depth, particularly between oxic and anoxic depths, similar to what we observed in 16S rRNA amplicon libraries from this site (B.B. Tolar, S. Kilpatrick, C. Dewey, S. Fendorf, J.R. Bargar, and C.A. Francis, submitted for publication). One obvious change in microbial communities is the dramatic increase in relative abundance of archaea in anoxic depths compared to oxic depths (Fig. 1). In contrast, abundant classes potentially containing methylotrophs such as Gammaproteobacteria, Methylomirabilia, and Gemmatimonadetes decrease between oxic and anoxic depths (Fig. 1). Archaea are most abundant and diverse in the anoxic depths (130 and 150 cm), with putative methane-cycling classes such as the Methanosarcinia (formerly within Methanomicrobia), Methanomicrobia, and Ca. Bathyarchaeia having high relative abundances in the community (Fig. 1). One MAG from the Ca. Methanoperedens genus is particularly abundant at OBJ2 in the 130-cm depth, indicating a possible methane-cycling hotspot. We identified MAGs as putative methane-cycling organisms (methanogens and methanotrophs) based on a combination of taxonomy and/or encoding methyl-coenzyme M reductase (MCR), pMMO, or sMMO genes. The distribution of putative methane-cycling MAGs was highly structured by depth in the soil column with a clear distinction between oxic and anoxic depths (Fig. 2). We obtained MAGs for 12 methanogens and 27 putative methanotrophs. We also recovered several other putative methylotroph MAGs, including those from the genera Ca. Methylomirabilis and Methyloceanibacter, highlighting the potential for cycling of other C1 compounds in addition to methane.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Abundance in reads per kilobase of genome per gigabase of metagenome (RPKG) of the 20 most abundant classes in the MAG library.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

The abundance in reads per kilobase of genome per gigabase of metagenome (RPKG) of putative methane-cycling microorganisms and select methylotrophs. Points colored by MAG family and sized based on genus abundance. The x-axis denotes GTDB-assigned family and genus name, which does not include the Candidatus notation.

Metabolic potential for methane production at depth

We recovered 12 methanogen MAGs from three orders, the Methanomicrobiales (Halobacteriota), Methanotrichales (Halobacteriota), and Methanomassiliicoccales (Thermoplasmatota). Within these three orders, MAGs originate from five different genera represented by nine lineages after dereplication at 98% ANI. Methanogen MAGs range from low to high quality (Table S2) and were only present in deep, saturated, anoxic depths (130 and 150 cm) that are conducive to methanogenesis (Fig. 2; Fig. S2).

We generated the most methanogen MAGs from within the Methanomicrobiales (n = 8) with varying quality levels (Table S2). Methanomicrobiales are known to carry out hydrogenotrophic (CO2-reducing) methanogenesis. Most Methanomicrobiales MAGs from SR contain some genes coding for the methyl and carbonyl branches of the WLP, MCR, MtrA-H, FdhAB, HdrABC, and MvhAGD, supporting that these organisms carry out hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis (Fig. S4). Methanoregula was the most abundant and diverse genus, and the Methanoregulaceae family was the predominant methanogen group in general (Fig. 2; Fig. S2). The relative abundance of different methanogen groups at SR indicates that hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis may dominate, but rates and relative contributions of different forms of methanogenesis require further study.

Methanomassiliicoccales are known to carry out H2-dependent methylotrophic methanogenesis growing on methanol, methylamines, or other methylated compounds using H2 as an electron donor for methanogenesis (3). The two MAGs generated from the family JACIVX01 (Methanomassiliicoccales) lack genes for the tetrahydromethanopterin (H4MPT) methyl branch of the WLP, most of the WLP carbonyl branch, and most genes for the Mtr enzyme as found in other Methanomassiliicoccales genomes (2, 25) while harboring genes for trimethylamine methyltransferase, HdrABC, and MvhAGD, indicating that these organisms carry out H2-dependent methylotrophic methanogenesis. These MAGs also contain cobalamin transport genes, which may be necessary for cobalamin-dependent proteins in the methylamine methyltransferase pathway, and the methyltransferase genes MTHFR and folD from the tetrahydrofolate (H4T) methyl branch of the WLP (Fig. S3). Methanomassiliicoccales are of low abundance in SR floodplains overall but found at both OBJ1 and OBJ2 at most anoxic depths (Fig. 2; Fig. S2). These organisms could be using methylamines with H2 generated from OC fermentation/degradation as opposed to fixing CO2 (2).

Methanotrichaceae (formerly Methanosaetaceae) perform aceticlastic methanogenesis (2628). Both MAGs from the Fen-7 (Methanotrichaceae) genus are very high quality (Table S2) and contain a multitude of genes required for methanogenesis, including complete or near-complete pathways for the methyl and carbonyl branches of the WLP, genes for MCR, MtrA-H, Fpo, HdrDE, FdhAB, and HdrABC while lacking genes for Ech-H-ase. The genes present in SR MAGs provide support that these organisms carry out aceticlastic methanogenesis. Methanotrichaceae MAGs are of low abundance in SR and only found at OBJ2 in the 130-cm depth. This could indicate that conditions at this particular depth and location may be able to support aceticlastic methanogens. Intriguingly, this is also the depth where we see a high abundance of Ca. Methanoperedens (discussed in detail below).

Notably, none of the 57 Ca. Bathyarchaeia MAGs generated from SR floodplain contained genes annotated as MCR. Ca. Bathyarchaeia are diverse and abundant in SR floodplain sediments, and our recovered MAGs spanned a wide range of completeness (50.2%–98.13%, mean = 71.9%), which may have hampered our ability to identify genomes for methanogenic Ca. Bathyarchaeia. We also recovered several MAGs from clades within the Thermoplasmata sister to Methanomassiliicoccales that encoded some genes related to methanogenesis. However, they did not encode MCR or MtrA-H, aligning with findings in two recent studies (29, 30) and supporting that these organisms are unlikely to be methanogens. However, some of these MAGs encoded genes related to anaerobic methylotrophy and will be discussed in detail below.

Anaerobic oxidation of methane by Ca. Methanoperedens

We recovered seven (three after dereplication) high-quality (>90% completeness) MAGs belonging to the genus Ca. Methanoperedens, which contains microorganisms capable of anaerobic methane oxidation through reverse methanogenesis (13, 31). Ca. Methanoperedens can use a range of terminal electron acceptors during methanotrophy, including nitrate and metal oxides (such as iron and manganese), and have the genetic potential to use selenate, arsenate, and elemental sulfur (17, 32). Ca. Methanoperedens may also use formate as an electron donor (32, 33), further expanding their methylotrophic abilities. Some Ca. Methanoperedens also contain extra chromosomal elements (ECEs), including Borgs and other large ECEs (34, 35), that could contribute to even greater metabolic flexibility for this group. Ca. Methanoperedens in the SR floodplain are found in 110- to 150-cm depths (Fig. 1; Fig. S3). Our three representative MAGs have different depth distributions (Fig. S3) leading to “110-cm,” “130-cm,” and “150-cm” lineages with some variations between their genomic content (Fig. 3; Fig. S3). The shallower MAGs predominating at 110 and 130 cm fall into the same clade, while the “deep” MAGs (predominant at 150 cm) fall into another clade based on a concatenated ribosomal protein phylogeny (Fig. 3). Ca. Methanoperedens MAG OBJ_0618_130150_coassembly_bin_115 is of very high quality (100% complete, 0% contamination; Table S2) and reaches extremely high abundance in OBJ2 at 130-cm depth (~1,400× coverage), accounting for >50% of the MAG community (Fig. 1). Ca. Methanoperedens have been found to have a pleomorphic lifestyle, displaying both free-living and biofilm lifestyles (36). This massive abundance of Ca. Methanoperedens at OBJ2 could indicate a biofilm was formed at this depth and highlights one aspect of lifestyle flexibility that could allow these organisms to thrive in a dynamic floodplain environment.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

(A) Phylogeny of Ca. Methanoperedenaceae based on concatenated ribosomal protein tree of 32 ribosomal proteins using IQ-TREE with model LG + F + R4 with 100 bootstraps and midpoint rooted. Bootstrap support >75% indicated by node color. (B)Select genes of interest that vary between SR Ca. Methanoperedens MAGs, including formate dehydrogenase (fdhB, fdoH/fdsB), hydrogenase maturation proteins (hypACDEF), hydrogenase (hya/hyb), vitamin B12 transport system (btuCD-F), methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (mcp), chemotaxis signal transduction proteins (cheA, cheB, cheC, cheR, cheW, and cheY), type IV pilus assembly protein (pilABC), flagellar proteins (fla), nitric oxide reductase (norB), cytochrome c nitrite reductase (nrfH), nitrogenase genes (nifHDK), ammonium transporter (amt), Fe-Mn family superoxide dismutase (SOD2), catalase (katE), and superoxide reductase (dfx).

Ca. Methanoperedens can couple methane oxidation to many different respiratory processes. MAGs in the “shallow” depths contain genes annotated as nrfH but lacked nrfA, indicating they may be capable of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA) and may rely on nitrification products produced within shallower, unsaturated, oxic depths. These MAGs also contain genes for nitrogenase (nif) to fix nitrogen (Fig. 3). Shallow Ca. Methanoperedens in the SR floodplain also harbor many motility and chemotaxis genes (Fig. 3). Ca. Methanoperedens nitroreducens Verserenetto upregulates oxidative stress genes and flagellar genes upon exposure to oxygen (37). In a dynamic floodplain environment where water saturation and oxygen penetration depth vary, depending on snowmelt, evaporation, and precipitation, the potential for motility would likely benefit these organisms, especially at depths closer to the transition zone. Although all the SR Ca. Methanoperedens MAGs harbored fdhB, the 110-cm MAGs also harbored fdoH/fdsB, indicating formate, instead of methane, could serve as an electron donor (Fig. 3). Along these lines, MAGs from 130 cm encoded Ni-iron (Fe) hydrogenase and hydrogenase maturation genes that could potentially allow these organisms to use hydrogen as an electron acceptor (Fig. 3). Deep Ca. Methanoperedens have more oxidative stress genes, perhaps indicating a stronger susceptibility to oxidative stress and preference for more stable anoxic conditions. These MAGs also lacked DNRA and nitrogenase genes but did encode the trimethylamine-corrinoid protein co-methyltransferase gene (mttB) and cobalamin transporter BtuCD-F (Fig. S3). However, since the other corrinoid-dependent methyl transfer genes for methylamines were missing, it is unclear whether methylamines can be used as a substrate. Genes for other corrinoid-dependent methyltransferase systems using different methylated substrates were not present. A pangenomic comparison of the 11 genomes in the clade containing the shallow SR Ca. Methanoperedens and the 6 genomes in the deep clade identified several genes enriched in each group, including archaeal flagellin and nitrogenase in the shallow clade and catalase in the deep clade (Fig. 3).

Environmental data show that high levels of OC exist at OBJ2 at 150-cm depth (Fig. S4). It is possible that Ca. Methanoperedens are responding to increased methane produced from degradation of this OC. Intriguingly, ammonia is also highest at OBJ2 130 cm and nitrate is low (Fig. S3), although we cannot determine whether this could be a signal of DNRA by Ca. Methanoperedens versus other organisms or simply ammonia released during mineralization of OC. Ca. Methanoperedens are known to have many multiheme cytochromes (MHCs) that may allow them to use metals as electron acceptors (32, 38). MAGs from SR contain several cytochrome c biogenesis genes and MHCs and could be using metals such as iron or manganese as electron acceptors in the SR floodplain. Dissolved iron and manganese have a consistent peak at 130-cm depth at OBJ2 from June to October (22), indicating that metal-reducing conditions are generally favorable at this depth. Water table height peaked on 4 June 2018 and started to decline, but another transient rise in water table height occurred on 18 June 2018, when we sampled OBJ2 (22). Perhaps Ca. Methanoperedens responded to a transient rise in the water table and the resulting increased community fermentation of high dissolved organic carbon (DOC) at 150 cm. As previously mentioned, the aceticlastic methanogens are also only in the sample with high Ca. Methanoperedens abundance, indicating a potential increase in acetate availability also related to the increased OC at depth. Microbial communities can respond very rapidly to wetting events in this system and produce large pulses of carbon dioxide (B.B. Tolar, unpublished data).

Aerobic methane oxidation by non-canonical methanotrophs

Two (one after dereplication) high-quality Fen-999 (Rhodocyclaceae) MAGs encoding sMMO (Fig. 4) were recovered from anoxic depths. From oxic depths, we recovered several MAGs from the Ca. Binatia that contain genes annotated as pmo (Fig. 4). Intriguingly, we did not recover MAGs for canonical aerobic methanotrophs in Alphproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, or Verrucomicrobiae. A handful of MAGs from these classes contained a single subunit for methane monooxygenase and intermittent downstream methylotrophy genes; however, their status as methanotrophs is unclear. We also recovered several MAGs from the Ca. Methylomirabilis and Methyloceanibacter, genera that contain methane-oxidizing organisms, though the SR MAGs did not encode methane monooxygenases (Fig. 4).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Select gene presence/absence for bacterial methylotrophs (including putative methanotrophs) sorted by GTDB-assigned taxonomy which does not include the Candidatus notation. CBB, Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle; rbcL/cbbL, ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase large chain; PRK/prkB, phosphoribulokinase; ME2/sfcA/maeA/mdh, malate dehydrogenase; leuB/IMDH, 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase; mmo, soluble methane monooxygenase; pmo, particulate methane monooxygenase; cox, carbon monoxide dehydrogenase; fds/fdo/fdh formate dehydrogenase; xoxF, lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenase; mauAB, methylamine dehydrogenase; nosZ, nitrous oxide reductase; nor, nitric oxide reductase; nirK, nitrite reductase; nar/nxr, nitrate reductase/nitrite oxidoreductase; napA, nitrate reductase; ureC, urease; nifHDK, nitrogenase; amt, ammonium transporter; CODH-ACS, carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase; acsA, acetyl-CoA decarbonylase/synthase, cooFS; anaerobic carbon-monoxide dehydrogenase; H4F, tetrahyrofolate; MTHFD, methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase; metF/MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; folD, methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase; fhs, formate—tetrahydrofolate ligase; fchA, formate—tetrahydrofolate ligase; mtd, methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase; mer, 5,10methylenetetrahydromethanopterin reductase; mch, methenyltetrahydromethanopterin cyclohydrolase; Fhc, formyltransferase/hydrolase complex; fwdABC/fmdABC, formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase; ftr, formylmethanofuran-tetrahydromethanopterin N-formyltransferase.

The Fen-999 MAG containing sMMO was present exclusively in anoxic depths. The MAG was of high quality (Table S2) and contained methylotrophy genes (Fig. 4), supporting the genetic potential for methanotrophy by this organism. While methanotrophs containing methane monooxygenases are considered aerobes due to the dependence of this enzyme on oxygen, a growing body of literature supports that methanotrophs and methane oxidation can occur under suboxic/anoxic conditions, possibly through cryptic O2 cycling [reviewed in reference (39)]. The genomes of these organisms support their methylotrophic potential, but their activity in anoxic depths must be confirmed. The soluble methane monooxygenase can also act on a variety of substrates in addition to methane (40), highlighting that this organism may be able to use other C1 compounds available in anoxic depths.

Within the class Ca. Binatia (formerly the phylum Ca. Binatota, now within the Desulfobacterota_B in GTDB), several MAGs from the families “Bin18” and Ca. Binataceae contained putative pathways for methane oxidation (Fig. 4). These MAGs were generally most abundant in unsaturated, oxic depths (Fig. 2; Fig. S2). Many organisms from throughout the uncultured Ca. Binatia contain genes for methylotrophy based on one of the few previous studies investigating this group (18). We recovered 3 (1 after dereplication) Bin18 (Ca. Binatia) MAGs and 18 (9 after dereplication) Ca. Binataceae MAGs originating from at least 3 genera. MAGs from both of these families are putative methanotrophs based on gene annotations of pmo genes. Within the Bin18 (Ca. Binatia) family, nearly all genomes for species representatives in GTDB contain methanotrophy and methylotrophy genes such as methanol dehydrogenase (Fig. 5). However, within the Ca. Binataceae family, the genetic potential for methanotrophy and methylotrophy is patchy (Fig. 5). A phylogeny shows that the genes annotated as pmoA from the Ca. Binatia fall into clades distinct from known methanotrophs and closer to proposed butane monooxygenases (Fig. S5). It is unclear exactly what substrate these enzymes may be oxidizing, though the genetic potential for methylotrophy in many of these organisms support that methane or other alkanes could be substrates for their metabolism. Ca. Binatia MAGs from SR also harbored genes for alkane degradation (Fig. S6), as previously reported (18). We did not observe genes encoding other corrinoid-dependent methyltransferase systems outside of those acting on methylamines.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Phylogeny of GTDB species representative genomes from the Ca. Binatia based on 23 concatenated ribosomal genes made using IQ-TREE and model LG + F + R8 with 1,000 bootstraps. Branch nodes with >75% support shown with black dots. “Bin18 and Ca. Binataceae MAGs from SR highlighted in hot pink and light pink, respectively. Select relevant gene presence shown with points on the right, including particulate methane monooxygenase (pmo), lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenase (xoxF), and methylamine dehydrogenase (mauAB) and monomethylamine corrinoid and methyltransferase genes (mtmABC). Labels denote the GTDB taxonomy which does not include the Candidatus notation.

Though there is very limited information on the activity and metabolism for the uncultured lineage Ca. Binatia, a metaproteomics study from Columbia River sediments supports that some members of this lineage can use carbon monoxide as a supplemental energy and/or carbon source (41). Ca. Binatia did not express carbon fixation pathways but did express genes for aerobic oxidation of carbon monoxide, organic nitrogen mineralization, and denitrification in metaproteomes, highlighting an active role in carbon and nitrogen cycling in the hyporheic zone (41). These Columbia River sediments from the hyporheic zone did not harbor any methanotrophs or methanogens, unlike in the SR floodplain sediments presented here. The diversity of this uncultured clade and of the putative methanotrophs in SR floodplain sediments is intriguing. The putative methylotrophic Ca. Binatia MAGs contained genes for denitrification and other metabolisms (Fig. S6), highlighting the need for further culturing, biochemical, and in situ activity studies to confirm the proposed metabolisms for the Ca. Binatia and their activity in the environment.

Our results yielded several MAGs from both the Ca. Methylomirabilis and Methyloceanibacter genera. Although both genera contain several strains capable of methanotrophy, SR MAGs from these groups do not appear to be methanotrophs (Fig. 4). Ca. Methylomirabilis is best known for containing organisms capable of nitrite-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation (n-DAMO). Ca. Methylomirabilis are abundant in oxic depths and yielded 12 (4 after dereplication) MAGs from 50.4% to 91.6% completeness (Table S2). However, SR MAGs lack PMO, nirS, Nod, napA, and norB but do harbor genes for NAR/NXR. Phylogenomic and pangenomic analyses reveal that the SR Ca. Methylomirabilis fall into a clade of the genus where no genomes thus far contain PMO or relevant denitrification genes (Fig. 6). It is unlikely the Ca. Methylomirabilis in SR are performing n-DAMO or methane oxidation; however, MAGs do contain methanol dehydrogenase and further downstream genes for methylotrophy, supporting their role in C1-cycling as methylotrophs (Fig. 4). Similarly, all eight Methyloceanibacter MAGs from SR lack methane monooxygenases and are not closely related to the known methanotrophic species but do contain methylotrophy genes (Fig. 4; Fig. S7). In the SR floodplain, Methyloceanibacter are found at all depths with representative MAG abundance partitioned by depth (Fig. 2; Fig. S2).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Phylogeny of Ca. Methylomirabilales based on concatenated ribosomal protein tree of 22 ribosomal proteins using IQ-TREE with model JTT + F + R4 with 1,000 bootstraps and midpoint rooted. Branch nodes with bootstrap support >75% shown by black dots. Blue indicates methanotrophic lineages within the Ca. Methylomirabilis, and red indicates MAGs from SR. Gene presence for the two Ca. Methylomirabilis genus clades shown to the right with methanotrophic lineage shown in blue, SR MAGs shown in red, and other methylotrophic genomes shown in black. Labels denote the GTDB taxonomy which does not include the Candidatus notation. pmo, particulate methane monooxygenase; xoxF, lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenase; nap, nitrate reductase; nar/nxr, nitrate reductase/nitrite oxidoreductase; nor, nitric oxide reductase; nirS nitrite reductase (dissimilatory); amt, ammonium transporter; nirA, ferredoxin-nitrite reductase (assimilatory).

Four other MAGs encoded a single methane monooxygenase subunit, however, their genome completeness (range = 51%–93%) may have hindered capturing the entire methane oxidation pathway. Although most contained a smattering of downstream methylotrophy genes (Fig. S8), we excluded them from our analysis. Generally, these MAGs were of low abundance [~2 reads per kilobase of genome per gigabase of metagenome (RPKG)] but could highlight the functional redundancy of methane oxidizers in this dynamic system. It is possible that, as environmental conditions change, these organisms could become more prominent methane oxidizers. Amazon River floodplain sediments contain diverse and abundant methanotrophs (42) and methanogens, leading to robust methane cycling with floodplains acting as both a methane sink or source, depending on flooding (43). Interestingly, in Amazon River floodplains, methanogens and methanotrophs were resilient to dramatic environmental fluctuations (i.e., flooding) and community structure was more strongly shaped by soil physicochemical factors than flooding (42, 43). Further study of methane fluxes as well as the activity of microorganisms in the SR sediments will shed light on the production and consumption of methane in the system.

Widespread genetic potential for methylotrophy

Although the genetic potential for methanotrophy was limited to a select few groups, consumption of other C1 compounds may be important in SR floodplain sediments. A survey of all MAGs containing an annotated methanol dehydrogenase gene revealed widespread potential for methylotrophy in the classes Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, and Ca. Methylomirabilia that were predominantly found in oxic soils (Fig. S9). In total, 10% of the 1,233 MAGs at SR contained methanol dehydrogenase. MAGs containing methanol dehydrogenase typically also contained the methyl branch of WLP and other downstream pathways necessary for methylotrophy (Fig. S10). Similarly, a study from nearby East River floodplain sediments found methanol dehydrogenase in ~10% of MAGs (44). Methanol is produced by pectin and lignin degradation and is a major volatile organic compound produced by plants and released into the atmosphere (40, 45). Methanol-oxidizing methylotrophs in sediments are important for mediating methanol fluxes to the atmosphere. Indeed, methanol oxidation can be robust in soils. A study of California grassland subroot (10- to 40-cm depth) soils found methanol dehydrogenase to be the most abundant protein in the proteome, predominantly from Gemmatimonadetes and also Ca. Rokubacteria (Ca. Methylomirabilia) (46), and methanol dehydrogenase genes (along with formate oxidation genes) were highly expressed in sediments of East River (44), a neighboring watershed to Slate River, CO, USA. Methanol-specific corrinoid-dependent methyltransferase genes were more rare, with methanol co-methyltransferase, mtaB, occurring in 1.6% of MAGs.

Methylamine dehydrogenase genes mauA or mauB were found in 14 genomes, primarily from Ca. Binatia and Gammaproteobacteria, while the dimethylamine/trimethylamine dehydrogenase gene dmd-tmd was found in 11 bacterial MAGs. Outside of methanol-specific genes, all other genes encoding corrinoid-dependent methyltransferase systems associated with anaerobic methylotrophy utilized methylated amines, including trimethylamine (mttB and mttC), dimethylamine (mtbC), monomethylamine (mtmB), and glycine-betaine (mtaA and mtgB). These genes were found in Ca. Bathyarchaiea and Thermoplasmata as discussed below, as well as a diversity of bacterial groups, most commonly within the Acidobacterota (particularly within Acidobacteriae and Candidatus Aminicenantia) and Chloroflexota (particularly within Anaerolineae and Candidatus Limnocylindria). The trimethylamine-corrinoid methyltransferase gene, mttB, was most commonly annotated, being present in 17% MAGs. In total, genes encoding for a substrate-corrinoid methyltransferase were present in 19.4% of MAGs. Genes encoding other corrinoid-dependent methyltransferase systems acting on methoxylated (mtv and mto), methylated sulfur (mts and mtp), and halogenated (cmuA, cmuB, and dcmA) compounds were not annotated in any MAGs. The widespread genetic potential for methylotrophy highlights the importance of OC breakdown and C1 cycling in this system under both oxic and anoxic conditions.

Potential for methylotrophic acetogenesis in thermoplasmata clade Ca. Gimiplasmatales

Not only did we uncover widespread potential for aerobic methylotrophy in SR, but also we identified potential anaerobic methylotrophy in non-methanogenic archaeal groups. Anaerobic methylotrophs include methylotrophic methanogens, acetogenic bacteria, and sulfate-reducing bacteria, with the latter two groups generally using methyltransferase systems, H4F and the WLP for energy conservation (4749). In SR, we recovered MAGs from several clades within the Thermoplasmata that are sister to the methanogenic order, Methanomassiliicoccales. Previous studies of MAGs from Thermoplasmata have found several basal clades to Methanomassiliicoccales that lacked MCR genes but contained a handful of genes related to methanogenesis, including HdrA-D, MvhAGD, and FmdE, with a few also encoding mttB, mttC, and mtmB (29, 30). We obtained MAGs from these sister orders, including Ca. Gimiplasmatales (UBA10834) and RBG-16–68-12, that did not encode MCR but encoded HdrA-D, MvhAGD, FmdE, most of the H4F methyl branch (Fhs, FolD, and MTHFR) of the WLP, and a handful also encoded mttB (Fig. S11). We obtained five MAGs from within the genus “COMBO-56–21” in Ca. Gimiplasmatales (29) containing the aforementioned genes and also including acsA-E for the carbonyl branch of WLP (as seen in methylotrophs), an acetate-CoA ligase (acdAB) (50), the RuMP pathway, rGlyP (51), complete pathways for glycolysis/glucogenesis, the pentose phosphate pathway, isoprenoid synthesis, de novo nucleotide synthesis, and amino acid synthesis. The genetic repertoire of these MAGs indicates these organisms could be capable of methylotrophic acetogenesis. Anaerobic methylotrophy has been proposed for archaea within the Ca. Brockarchaeota, which have been hypothesized to perform anaerobic C-cycling in hot springs and mesophilic sediments by using the H4F methyl branch and a rGlyP pathway (52). Ca. Methanoperedens can produce acetate during anaerobic methanotrophy (50, 53, 54). Others have also proposed methylotrophic acetogenesis in some clades of Ca. Bathyarchaeia based on the presence of methylamine transferases and WLPs (55). The possibility of methylotrophy in Ca. Gimiplasmatales has also been proposed previously (29), though not necessarily linked to acetogenesis.

Acetogenesis has been described in several groups of archaea, including Ca. Bathyarchaeia (56), Asgard archaea (57, 58), and methane-based acetogenesis in ANME (27, 50, 54, 59). The SR MAGs from the genus “COMBO-56–12” (Ca. Gimiplasmatales) encoded genes for the methylation of trimethylamines (mttB and mttC), methylamine (mtmB), and glycine betaine (mtgB) (Fig. S11), supporting that trimethylamine utilization may occur in Ca. Gimiplasmatales as previously suggested (29) as well as the use of other methylated amines. Given the lack of the second methyltransferase genes for these three-component, corrinoid-dependent methyltransferase systems, the transfer of the methylated compound from the corrinoid protein to tetrahydrofolate may occur via an undescribed protein and proceed through the H4F pathway to join the rGlyP or RuMP, as proposed for Ca. Brockarchaeota (52). Compounds can also make it through the RuMP to the non-oxidative pentoses phosphate pathway and ultimately to pyruvate and acetyl-CoA. ATP could be generated via the acetate-CoA ligase (60). The presence of HdrABC and MchAGD could recycle CoM. The most complete (97.6%) COMBO-56–21 MAG contains complete pathways for de novo purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis; threonine, valine, and isoleucine biosynthesis; thiamine biosynthesis; and isoprenoid biosynthesis; as well as the complete pathway for PRPP biosynthesis. This MAG also contains a near-complete gluconeogenesis pathway minus the step for glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, as seen in an analysis of several Ca. Gimiplasmatales (29). This could indicate that gluconeogenesis participates in the PPP shunt, as the final step to glucose is missing. There is also an incomplete tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (only the second carbon oxidation half from isocitrate to malate). The COMBO-56–21 MAGs were only present in anoxic depths and are abundant in SR (Fig. 2; Fig. S2). These COMBO-56–21 also harbored motility genes (Fig. 3). A pangenome of available COMBO-56–21 genomes revealed an average genome size of 1.9 Mb (for genomes >90% complete). Other archaeal MAGs in Thermoplasmata, found predominantly at oxic depths, may be capable of carbon monoxide oxidation based on the presence of coxMSL (Fig. S11). Our understanding of the metabolic diversity of Thermoplasmata has greatly expanded in recent years to include diverse non-methanogenic metabolisms in several candidate orders, including fermentation in SG8-5 (61), copper membrane monooxygenases of unknown function in Ca. Angelarchaeales (62), acidophilic heterotrophy in the Ca. Lutacidiplasmatales (63), and mixotrophy in Ca. Gimiplasmatales (29). Our study builds on these findings to highlight that these abundant sediment organisms may also be methylotrophs.

SR Ca. Bathyarchaeia MAGs lack genes for methanogenesis

Ca. Bathyarchaeia are known for anaerobic OC cycling and processing complex carbohydrates (64, 65), with some clades containing the metabolic potential for methanotrophy (5), methylotrophy (55), and acetogenesis (56). However, their potential roles as methylotrophs in SR floodplain sediments were less clear. Although none of the Ca. Bathyarchaeia MAGs from the SR floodplain harbored MCR, most contained near-complete or complete WLPs and some genes found in methanogenesis and methylotrophic pathways (Fig. S11). Some Ca. Bathyarchaeia MAGs from SR encoded partial corrinoid-dependent methylamine transfer systems, most commonly, mttB, or methanol dehydrogenases in addition to genes for versatile C metabolisms, suggesting they could be facultative methylotrophs. Even if the Ca. Bathyarchaeia themselves are not carrying out methylotrophy, many SR Ca. Bathyarchaeia MAGs encoded genes for fermentation and aromatic carbon degradation, indicating they could play an important role in OC degradation and supplying C1 compounds to methanogens and methylotrophs. Ca. Bathyarchaeia are most abundant at OBJ2 at 150-cm depth (Fig. 1), where OC is highest (Fig. S3), though they are generally abundant within all anoxic depths.

Conclusions

Diverse methane-cycling microorganisms are found at the SR floodplain, including recently described groups such as Ca. Binatia, Methanomassiliicoccales, and Ca. Methanoperedens, the latter of which was exceptionally abundant in the anoxic 130-cm depth at OBJ2. Non-canonical methanotrophs were the dominant putative methanotrophs in the system, with canonical bacterial methanotrophs being notably absent from the MAG library. Surprisingly, Ca. Methylomirabilis in SR do not harbor pathways encoding for n-DAMO, and our analysis supports that other related strains in this genus are also not methanotrophs. A broader survey for methylotrophy revealed widespread potential for methanol oxidation in oxic depths and anaerobic methylotrophy, particularly utilizing methylated amines, in some abundant Ca. Bathyarchaeia, Thermoplasmata, and Acidobacterota in anoxic depths of the SR floodplain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection

Samples were collected at two sites, OBJ1 and OBJ2, from a gravel bed floodplain at the confluence of a tributary of the Slate River, Oh-Be-Joyful Creek, and Slate River (38°54′34.59′′ N, 107°1′43.40′′ W), at six different depth horizons including 50, 70, 90, 110, 130, and 150 cm below the sediment surface. Samples were collected on 18 June 2018 (OBJ2) and 20 June 2018 (OBJ1), during a historically low water year in the western USA.

Environmental data

Environmental data were collected from our Slate River sites and measured as previously described in references (22, 24). Briefly, porewater was collected through 0.6-µm pore-size Rhizon samplers (Rhizosphere Research Products, Wageningen, Netherlands) at each soil depth horizon for dissolved metal and organic carbon quantification. Samples for dissolved metal quantification were acidified with nitric acid to ~2% final concentration of acid. Soil samples were collected with a bucket auger from depths corresponding to those of porewater rhizon samplers. Dissolved Fe and S were measured on a Thermo Scientific ICAP 6300 Duo View inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer with a solid-state CID detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Solid-phase metals and sulfur were measured by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Solids were dried and ground for XRF analysis. Additionally, aqueous phase concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), total OC (TOC), and total nitrogen (TN) were measured via water extraction by suspending 1 g of soil in 10 mL of ultrapure water, shaking at room temperature for 2 h, centrifuging at 4,000 rpm for 10–15 min, and filtering the aqueous phase through a 0.22-µm disk filter (Fisher Scientific). DIN (ammonia and nitrate) concentrations were measured on a SmartChem 200 Discrete Analyzer (WestCo Scientific Instruments, Brookfield, CT, USA) by spectroscopy. TOC and TN were measured by the Arizona Laboratory for Emerging Contaminants, at the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA (https://www.alec.arizona.edu) on a Shimadzu TOC-LCSN (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA).

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from frozen soil/sediment samples using the DNeasy PowerMax Soil Kit (Qiagen). Each soil sample was thawed, and a subsample (~5 g) was weighed out directly into a PowerMax bead tube for immediate extraction. The manufacturer’s protocol was followed as written, with the addition of an incubation step (80°C for 40 min) to improve yield, immediately after bead beating (10-min vortex). After extraction, DNA was eluted in 5-mL solution C6 and subsequently concentrated to ~1 mL using VivaSpin Turbo 15 columns (Sartorius). DNA concentration (ng/µL) was determined using the Qubit dsDNA Broad Range Assay (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Metagenomic assembly, binning, and annotation

Twelve metagenomes were sequenced via the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) through a FICUS project (proposal ID 504298) on an Illumina NovaSeq S4. Metagenome sizes and read counts are available in Table S1. Quality Controlled Filtered Raw metagenome data (JGI project IDs 1359525–1359536) were downloaded from JGI Genome Portal for assembly, binning, and refining using the metaWRAP (v.1.3.2) pipeline (66). Assemblies and co-assemblies were made using megahit. Single-sample assemblies were binned using contigs of >2,000 nt using MetaBAT2 (v.2.12.1) (67), MaxBin 2.0 (v.2.2.6) (68), and CONCOCT (v.1.0.0) (69) with multiple fastq files grouped by surface (50-cm depth), middle depth (70–110 cm), and anoxic depths (130–150 cm). Co-assemblies were binned in a similar manner using contigs of >2,500 nt in length and multiple fastq files. Bins were consolidated and filtered using metawrap bin_refinement to be above >50% completeness and have <10% contamination as calculated via CheckM (v.1.1.3) (70). All MAGs were dereplicated using dRep (v.3.1.1) (71) at 98% ANI. Taxonomic classification for each representative MAG was made using the Genome Taxonomy Database Toolkit (72) with the database release 07-RS207. Reads were competitively recruited to dereplicated MAG library using Bowtie2 (v.2.4.2) (73) and the default parameters. Abundances are displayed as unpaired reads recruited per genome size of MAG in kilobases of MAG divided by gigabase of metagenome (RPKG), and coverage values were calculated using inStrain (74). Genes were called using Prodigal (v.2.6.3) (75), and translated gene annotations were performed via KEGG using GhostKOALA (76). For select MAGs of interest, translated sequences were also annotated using the RAST tool kit (RAST-tk v.2.0) (77, 78) for SEED (79) annotation. Genomes were also annotated using the METABOLIC (80) pipeline.

Phylogenomics and pangenomics

Genomes for species representatives for select clades in the GTDB database (release 07-RS207) were downloaded from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. Additional Ca. Methanoperedens genomes were downloaded from NCBI. Anvi’o (hope v.7) (81) was used to annotate, analyze, and compare downloaded methane-cycler genomes, in addition to the finalized MAGs generated in this study, following the standard phylogenomics and pangenomics workflows. Contigs shorter than 500 bp in length were excluded from the analysis. Conserved ribosomal and housekeeping genes were annotated with the seven default hmm databases used by anvi-run-hmms with the argument –also-scan-trnas, which uses tRNAscan-SE (v.2.0.7) to annotate tRNAs. All genomes were annotated using COG, KEGG KO, and pfams through the anvi’o pipeline with Diamond set to fast. Completeness and contamination were calculated using CheckM (v.1.1.3). Concatenated and aligned amino acid sequences were retrieved from MAGs using anvi-get-sequences-for-hmm-hits and MUSCLE (82) for bacterial or archaeal ribosomal genes. Genomes had to include at least 50% of ribosomal genes, and ribosomal genes had to be found in >90% of genomes to be included in alignments. Gaps in amino acid alignments with less than 50% coverage were removed using trimAl (v.1.4.rev15) (83). Then IQ-TREE (v.2.0.3) (84) was used for extended model selection for phylogeny of MAGs via -m MFP with the final phylogenomic tree based on the best model and with 1,000 bootstraps. Gene enrichment between groups was calculated using the anvi-compute-functional-enrichment function, and the adjusted P value was used to correct for multiple testing (85). Gene sequences of interest (i.e., pmoA) were collected from pangenomes using anvi-get-sequences-for-gene-clusters. Gene summaries for pangenomes were generated using anvi-summarize.

Figure generation

Figures were generated using R (v.4.1.2). Phylogenetic tree figures were edited using iTOL (v.6.8.2) and FigTree (v.1.4.4). Figures were formatted using Inkscape (v.1.3).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the support of the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (RMBL), the Crested Butte Land Trust, and the Bureau of Land Management for supporting access to the research site. Metagenomic data were provided by JGI through a FICUS proposal (proposal ID 504298). We thank the RMBL for field and logistical support, especially J. Reithel; additional support in the field was provided by K.H. Williams (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) and C. Dewey. Support for geochemical analysis was provided by J.L. Pacheco, G. Li, D. Turner, and the Stanford University Environmental Measurements Facility. We thank D.M. Barrientes and M.K.D. Amistadi ( Arizona Laboratory for Emerging Contaminants, University of Arizona).

Funding for this work was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, through its support of the SLAC Floodplain Hydro-Biogeochemistry Science Focus Area. S.S.R.L. and S.L.A.C. are supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under contract no. DE- AC02-76SF00515.

Contributor Information

Christopher A. Francis, Email: caf@stanford.edu.

Jingjing Peng, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The MAGs described in this study have been uploaded to figshare (10.6084/m9.figshare.25320592).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00314-24.

Supplemental figures. msystems.00314-24-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1- S11.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00314-24.SuF1
Table S1. msystems.00314-24-s0002.xlsx.

Metagenome data.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00314-24.SuF2
Table S2. msystems.00314-24-s0003.xlsx.

Taxonomic and genome quality data for C1-cycling MAGs.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00314-24.SuF3

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Adam PS, Borrel G, Gribaldo S. 2019. An archaeal origin of the Wood–Ljungdahl H4MPT branch and the emergence of bacterial methylotrophy. Nat Microbiol 4:2155–2163. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0534-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kurth JM, Op den Camp HJM, Welte CU. 2020. Several ways one goal—methanogenesis from unconventional substrates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:6839–6854. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10724-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lang K, Schuldes J, Klingl A, Poehlein A, Daniel R, Brunea A. 2015. New mode of energy metabolism in the seventh order of methanogens as revealed by comparative genome analysis of “Candidatus methanoplasma termitum”. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1338–1352. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03389-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Liu Y, Whitman WB. 2008. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1125:171–189. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Evans PN, Parks DH, Chadwick GL, Robbins SJ, Orphan VJ, Golding SD, Tyson GW. 2015. Methane metabolism in the archaeal phylum bathyarchaeota revealed by genome-centric metagenomics. Science 350:434–438. doi: 10.1126/science.aac7745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Vanwonterghem I, Evans PN, Parks DH, Jensen PD, Woodcroft BJ, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2016. Methylotrophic methanogenesis discovered in the archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota. Nat Microbiol 1:16170. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kalyuzhnaya MG, Gomez OA, Murrell JC. 2019. The methane-oxidizing bacteria (methanotrophs), p 245–278. In McGenity TJ (ed), Taxonomy, genomics and ecophysiology of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes. Springer International Publishing, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dunfield PF, Yuryev A, Senin P, Smirnova AV, Stott MB, Hou S, Ly B, Saw JH, Zhou Z, Ren Y, Wang J, Mountain BW, Crowe MA, Weatherby TM, Bodelier PLE, Liesack W, Feng L, Wang L, Alam M. 2007. Methane oxidation by an extremely acidophilic bacterium of the phylum Verrucomicrobia. Nature 450:879–882. doi: 10.1038/nature06411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pol A, Heijmans K, Harhangi HR, Tedesco D, Jetten MSM, Op den Camp HJM. 2007. Methanotrophy below pH 1 by a new Verrucomicrobia species. Nature 450:874–878. doi: 10.1038/nature06222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhu B, Karwautz C, Andrei S, Klingl A, Pernthaler J, Lueders T. 2022. A novel Methylomirabilota methanotroph potentially couples methane oxidation to iodate reduction. mLife 1:323–328. doi: 10.1002/mlf2.12033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ettwig KF, Butler MK, Le Paslier D, Pelletier E, Mangenot S, Kuypers MMM, Schreiber F, Dutilh BE, Zedelius J, de Beer D, Gloerich J, Wessels H, van Alen T, Luesken F, Wu ML, van de Pas-Schoonen KT, Op den Camp HJM, Janssen-Megens EM, Francoijs K-J, Stunnenberg H, Weissenbach J, Jetten MSM, Strous M. 2010. Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 464:543–548. doi: 10.1038/nature08883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hinrichs K-U, Hayes JM, Sylva SP, Brewer PG, DeLong EF. 1999. Methane-consuming archaebacteria in marine sediments. Nature 398:802–805. doi: 10.1038/19751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Raghoebarsing AA, Pol A, van de Pas-Schoonen KT, Smolders AJP, Ettwig KF, Rijpstra WIC, Schouten S, Damsté JSS, Op den Camp HJM, Jetten MSM, Strous M. 2006. A microbial consortium couples anaerobic methane oxidation to denitrification. Nature 440:918–921. doi: 10.1038/nature04617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Welte CU, Rasigraf O, Vaksmaa A, Versantvoort W, Arshad A, Op den Camp HJM, Jetten MSM, Lüke C, Reimann J. 2016. Nitrate- and nitrite-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane. Environ Microbiol Rep 8:941–955. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Shi L-D, Lv P-L, McIlroy SJ, Wang Z, Dong X-L, Kouris A, Lai C-Y, Tyson GW, Strous M, Zhao H-P. 2021. Methane-dependent selenate reduction by a bacterial consortium. ISME J 15:3683–3692. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01044-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cai C, Leu AO, Xie G-J, Guo J, Feng Y, Zhao J-X, Tyson GW, Yuan Z, Hu S. 2018. A methanotrophic archaeon couples anaerobic oxidation of methane to Fe(III) reduction. ISME J 12:1929–1939. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0109-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Leu AO, Cai C, McIlroy SJ, Southam G, Orphan VJ, Yuan Z, Hu S, Tyson GW. 2020. Anaerobic methane oxidation coupled to manganese reduction by members of the Methanoperedenaceae. ISME J 14:1030–1041. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0590-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Murphy CL, Sheremet A, Dunfield PF, Spear JR, Stepanauskas R, Woyke T, Elshahed MS, Youssef NH. 2021. Genomic analysis of the yet-uncultured Binatota reveals broad methylotrophic, alkane-degradation, and pigment production capacities. mBio 12:e00985-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00985-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chistoserdova L. 2011. Modularity of methylotrophy, revisited. Environ Microbiol 13:2603–2622. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02464.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ellenbogen JB, Borton MA, McGivern BB, Cronin DR, Hoyt DW, Freire-Zapata V, McCalley CK, Varner RK, Crill PM, Wehr RA, Chanton JP, Woodcroft BJ, Tfaily MM, Tyson GW, Rich VI, Wrighton KC. 2024. Methylotrophy in the Mire: direct and indirect routes for methane production in thawing permafrost. mSystems 9:e0069823. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00698-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Johnson ZJ, Krutkin DD, Bohutskyi P, Kalyuzhnaya MG. 2021. Metals and methylotrophy: via global gene expression studies. Methods Enzymol 650:185–213. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2021.01.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Dewey C, Bargar JR, Fendorf S. 2021. Porewater lead concentrations limited by particulate organic matter coupled with ephemeral iron(III) and sulfide phases during redox cycles within contaminated floodplain soils. Environ Sci Technol 55:5878–5886. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Engel M, Boye K, Noël V, Babey T, Bargar JR, Fendorf S. 2021. Simulated aquifer heterogeneity leads to enhanced attenuation and multiple retention processes of zinc. Environ Sci Technol 55:2939–2948. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Dewey C, Juillot F, Fendorf S, Bargar JR. 2023. Seasonal oxygenation of contaminated floodplain soil releases Zn to porewater. Environ Sci Technol 57:4841–4851. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Söllinger A, Urich T. 2019. Methylotrophic methanogens everywhere — physiology and ecology of novel players in global methane cycling. Biochem Soc Trans 47:1895–1907. doi: 10.1042/BST20180565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Barber RD, Zhang L, Harnack M, Olson MV, Kaul R, Ingram-Smith C, Smith KS. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Methanosaeta concilii, a specialist in aceticlastic methanogenesis. J Bacteriol 193:3668–3669. doi: 10.1128/JB.05031-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Berger S, Welte C, Deppenmeier U. 2012. Acetate activation in Methanosaeta thermophila: characterization of the key enzymes pyrophosphatase and acetyl-CoA synthetase. Archaea 2012:315153. doi: 10.1155/2012/315153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Welte C, Deppenmeier U. 2014. Bioenergetics and anaerobic respiratory chains of aceticlastic methanogens. Biochim Biophys Acta 1837:1130–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Hu W, Pan J, Wang B, Guo J, Li M, Xu M. 2021. Metagenomic insights into the metabolism and evolution of a new Thermoplasmata order (Candidatus Gimiplasmatales). Environ Microbiol 23:3695–3709. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zinke LA, Evans PN, Santos-Medellín C, Schroeder AL, Parks DH, Varner RK, Rich VI, Tyson GW, Emerson JB. 2021. Evidence for non-methanogenic metabolisms in globally distributed archaeal clades basal to the Methanomassiliicoccales. Environ Microbiol 23:340–357. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Haroon MF, Hu S, Shi Y, Imelfort M, Keller J, Hugenholtz P, Yuan Z, Tyson GW. 2013. Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature 500:567–570. doi: 10.1038/nature12375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Leu AO, McIlroy SJ, Ye J, Parks DH, Orphan VJ, Tyson GW. 2020. Lateral gene transfer drives metabolic flexibility in the anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaeal family Methanoperedenaceae. mBio 11:e01325-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01325-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Xie M, Zheng Y, Zhang X, Xia J, Maulani N, Yuan Z, Cai C, Hu S. 2023. Formate as an alternative electron donor for the anaerobic methanotrophic archaeon Candidatus ‘Methanoperedens nitroreducens‘. Environ Sci Technol Lett 10:506–512. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00220 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Al-Shayeb B, Schoelmerich MC, West-Roberts J, Valentin-Alvarado LE, Sachdeva R, Mullen S, Crits-Christoph A, Wilkins MJ, Williams KH, Doudna JA, Banfield JF. 2022. Borgs are giant genetic elements with potential to expand metabolic capacity. Nature 610:731–736. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05256-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Schoelmerich MC, Ouboter HT, Sachdeva R, Penev PI, Amano Y, West-Roberts J, Welte CU, Banfield JF. 2022. A widespread group of large plasmids in methanotrophic Methanoperedens archaea. Nat Commun 13:7085. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34588-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. McIlroy SJ, Leu AO, Zhang X, Newell R, Woodcroft BJ, Yuan Z, Hu S, Tyson GW. 2023. Anaerobic methanotroph ‘Candidatus Methanoperedens nitroreducens’ has a pleomorphic life cycle. Nat Microbiol 8:321–331. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01292-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Guerrero-Cruz S, Cremers G, van Alen TA, Op den Camp HJM, Jetten MSM, Rasigraf O, Vaksmaa A. 2018. Response of the anaerobic methanotroph “Candidatus Methanoperedens nitroreducens” to oxygen stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01832-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01832-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Arshad A, Speth DR, de Graaf RM, Op den Camp HJM, Jetten MSM, Welte CU. 2015. A metagenomics-based metabolic model of nitrate-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane by Methanoperedens-like archaea. Front Microbiol 6:1423. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Chistoserdova L, Kalyuzhnaya MG. 2018. Current trends in methylotrophy. Trends Microbiol 26:703–714. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Fall R, Benson AA. 1996. Leaf methanol — the simplest natural product from plants. Trends Plant Sci 1:296–301. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(96)88175-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Rodríguez-Ramos JA, Borton MA, McGivern BB, Smith GJ, Solden LM, Shaffer M, Daly RA, Purvine SO, Nicora CD, Eder EK, Lipton M, Hoyt DW, Stegen JC, Wrighton KC. 2022. Genome-resolved metaproteomics decodes the microbial and viral contributions to coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in river sediments. mSystems 7:e0051622. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00516-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gontijo JB, Paula FS, Venturini AM, Yoshiura CA, Borges CD, Moura JMS, Bohannan BJM, Nüsslein K, Rodrigues JLM, Tsai SM. 2021. Not just a methane source: Amazonian floodplain sediments harbour a high diversity of methanotrophs with different metabolic capabilities. Mol Ecol 30:2560–2572. doi: 10.1111/mec.15912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Bento M de S, Barros DJ, Araújo M da S, Da Róz R, Carvalho GA, do Carmo JB, Toppa RH, Neu V, Forsberg BR, Bodelier PLE, Tsai SM, Navarrete AA. 2021. Active methane processing microbes and the disproportionate role of NC10 phylum in methane mitigation in Amazonian floodplains. Biogeochemistry 156:293–317. doi: 10.1007/s10533-021-00846-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Matheus Carnevali PB, Lavy A, Thomas AD, Crits-Christoph A, Diamond S, Méheust R, Olm MR, Sharrar A, Lei S, Dong W, Falco N, Bouskill N, Newcomer ME, Nico P, Wainwright H, Dwivedi D, Williams KH, Hubbard S, Banfield JF. 2021. Meanders as a scaling motif for understanding of floodplain soil microbiome and biogeochemical potential at the watershed scale. Microbiome 9:121. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00957-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Jacob DJ, Field BD, Li Q, Blake DR, de Gouw J, Warneke C, Hansel A, Wisthaler A, Singh HB, Guenther A. 2005. Global budget of methanol: constraints from atmospheric observations. J Geophys Res 110:110. doi: 10.1029/2004JD005172 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Butterfield CN, Li Z, Andeer PF, Spaulding S, Thomas BC, Singh A, Hettich RL, Suttle KB, Probst AJ, Tringe SG, Northen T, Pan C, Banfield JF. 2016. Proteogenomic analyses indicate bacterial methylotrophy and archaeal heterotrophy are prevalent below the grass root zone. PeerJ 4:e2687. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Stupperich E, Konle R. 1993. Corrinoid-dependent methyl transfer reactions are involved in methanol and 3,4-dimethoxybenzoate metabolism by Sporomusa ovata. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3110–3116. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.9.3110-3116.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Das A, Fu Z-Q, Tempel W, Liu Z-J, Chang J, Chen L, Lee D, Zhou W, Xu H, Shaw N, Rose JP, Ljungdahl LG, Wang B-C. 2007. Characterization of a corrinoid protein involved in the C1 metabolism of strict anaerobic bacterium Moorella thermoacetica. Proteins 67:167–176. doi: 10.1002/prot.21094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Sousa DZ, Visser M, van Gelder AH, Boeren S, Pieterse MM, Pinkse MWH, Verhaert P, Vogt C, Franke S, Kümmel S, Stams AJM. 2018. The deep-subsurface sulfate reducer Desulfotomaculum kuznetsovii employs two methanol-degrading pathways. Nat Commun 9:239. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02518-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ouboter HT, Arshad A, Berger S, Saucedo Sanchez JG, Op den Camp HJM, Jetten MSM, Welte CU, Kurth JM. 2023. Acetate and acetyl-CoA metabolism of ANME-2 anaerobic archaeal methanotrophs. Appl Environ Microbiol 89:e0036723. doi: 10.1128/aem.00367-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Figueroa IA, Barnum TP, Somasekhar PY, Carlström CI, Engelbrektson AL, Coates JD. 2018. Metagenomics-guided analysis of microbial chemolithoautotrophic phosphite oxidation yields evidence of a seventh natural CO2 fixation pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E92–E101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715549114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. De Anda V, Chen L-X, Dombrowski N, Hua Z-S, Jiang H-C, Banfield JF, Li W-J, Baker BJ. 2021. Brockarchaeota, a novel archaeal phylum with unique and versatile carbon cycling pathways. Nat Commun 12:2404. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22736-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Berger S, Cabrera-Orefice A, Jetten MSM, Brandt U, Welte CU. 2021. Investigation of central energy metabolism-related protein complexes of ANME-2d methanotrophic archaea by complexome profiling. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1862:148308. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2020.148308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Cai C, Shi Y, Guo J, Tyson GW, Hu S, Yuan Z. 2019. Acetate production from anaerobic oxidation of methane via intracellular storage compounds. Environ Sci Technol 53:7371–7379. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Farag IF, Biddle JF, Zhao R, Martino AJ, House CH, León-Zayas RI. 2020. Metabolic potentials of archaeal lineages resolved from metagenomes of deep Costa Rica sediments. ISME J 14:1345–1358. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0615-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. He Y, Li M, Perumal V, Feng X, Fang J, Xie J, Sievert SM, Wang F. 2016. Genomic and enzymatic evidence for acetogenesis among multiple lineages of the archaeal phylum bathyarchaeota widespread in marine sediments. Nat Microbiol 1:16035. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Orsi WD, Vuillemin A, Rodriguez P, Coskun ÖK, Gomez-Saez GV, Lavik G, Mohrholz V, Ferdelman TG. 2020. Metabolic activity analyses demonstrate that Lokiarchaeon exhibits homoacetogenesis in sulfidic marine sediments. Nat Microbiol 5:248–255. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0630-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Seitz KW, Lazar CS, Hinrichs K-U, Teske AP, Baker BJ. 2016. Genomic reconstruction of a novel, deeply branched sediment archaeal phylum with pathways for acetogenesis and sulfur reduction. ISME J 10:1696–1705. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Yang S, Lv Y, Liu X, Wang Y, Fan Q, Yang Z, Boon N, Wang F, Xiao X, Zhang Y. 2020. Genomic and enzymatic evidence of acetogenesis by anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. Nat Commun 11:3941. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17860-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Schäfer T, Selig M, Schönheit P. 1993. Acetyl-CoA synthetase (ADP forming) in archaea, a novel enzyme involved in acetate formation and ATP synthesis. Arch Microbiol 159:72–83. doi: 10.1007/BF00244267 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Lazar CS, Baker BJ, Seitz KW, Teske AP. 2017. Genomic reconstruction of multiple lineages of uncultured benthic archaea suggests distinct biogeochemical roles and ecological niches. ISME J 11:1118–1129. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Diamond S, Lavy A, Crits-Christoph A, Matheus Carnevali PB, Sharrar A, Williams KH, Banfield JF. 2022. Soils and sediments host Thermoplasmata archaea encoding novel copper membrane monooxygenases (CuMMOs). ISME J 16:1348–1362. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01177-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Sheridan PO, Meng Y, Williams TA, Gubry-Rangin C. 2022. Recovery of Lutacidiplasmatales archaeal order genomes suggests convergent evolution in Thermoplasmatota. Nat Commun 13:4110. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31847-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Feng X, Wang Y, Zubin R, Wang F. 2019. Core metabolic features and hot origin of bathyarchaeota. Engineering 5:498–504. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Zhou Z, Pan J, Wang F, Gu J-D, Li M. 2018. Bathyarchaeota: globally distributed metabolic generalists in anoxic environments. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42:639–655. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuy023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. 2018. MetaWRAP—a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome 6:158. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. 2016. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32:605–607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, Loman NJ, Andersson AF, Quince C. 2013. CONCOCT: clustering cONtigs on COverage and ComposiTion. ArXiv13124038 Q-Bio. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1312.4038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. 2017. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J 11:2864–2868. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Olm MR, Crits-Christoph A, Bouma-Gregson K, Firek BA, Morowitz MJ, Banfield JF. 2021. inStrain profiles population microdiversity from metagenomic data and sensitively detects shared microbial strains. Nat Biotechnol 39:727–736. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-00797-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. 2016. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 428:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, et al. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Thomason JA, Stevens R, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F. 2015. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Zhou Z, Tran PQ, Breister AM, Liu Y, Kieft K, Cowley ES, Karaoz U, Anantharaman K. 2022. METABOLIC: high-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits, metabolism, biogeochemistry, and community-scale functional networks. Microbiome 10:33. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01213-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Delmont TO. 2015. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 3:e1319. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Shaiber A, Willis AD, Delmont TO, Roux S, Chen L-X, Schmid AC, Yousef M, Watson AR, Lolans K, Esen ÖC, Lee STM, Downey N, Morrison HG, Dewhirst FE, Mark Welch JL, Eren AM. 2020. Functional and genetic markers of niche partitioning among enigmatic members of the human oral microbiome. Genome Biol 21:292. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02195-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental figures. msystems.00314-24-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1- S11.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00314-24.SuF1
Table S1. msystems.00314-24-s0002.xlsx.

Metagenome data.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00314-24.SuF2
Table S2. msystems.00314-24-s0003.xlsx.

Taxonomic and genome quality data for C1-cycling MAGs.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00314-24.SuF3

Data Availability Statement

The MAGs described in this study have been uploaded to figshare (10.6084/m9.figshare.25320592).


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES