ABSTRACT
The occurrence of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) is related to their physical and chemical environment. However, less is known about their associated microbial interactions and processes. In this study, cyanoHABs were analyzed as a microbial ecosystem, using 1 year of 16S rRNA sequencing and 70 metagenomes collected during the bloom season from Lake Okeechobee (Florida, USA). Biogeographical patterns observed in microbial community composition and function reflected ecological zones distinct in their physical and chemical parameters that resulted in bloom “hotspots” near major lake inflows. Changes in relative abundances of taxa within multiple phyla followed increasing bloom severity. Functional pathways that correlated with increasing bloom severity encoded organic nitrogen and phosphorus utilization, storage of nutrients, exchange of genetic material, phage defense, and protection against oxidative stress, suggesting that microbial interactions may promote cyanoHAB resilience. Cyanobacterial communities were highly diverse, with picocyanobacteria ubiquitous and oftentimes most abundant, especially in the absence of blooms. The identification of novel bloom-forming cyanobacteria and genomic comparisons indicated a functionally diverse cyanobacterial community with differences in its capability to store nitrogen using cyanophycin and to defend against phage using CRISPR and restriction-modification systems. Considering blooms in the context of a microbial ecosystem and their interactions in nature, physiologies and interactions supporting the proliferation and stability of cyanoHABs are proposed, including a role for phage infection of picocyanobacteria. This study displayed the power of “-omics” to reveal important biological processes that could support the effective management and prediction of cyanoHABs.
IMPORTANCE
Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms pose a significant threat to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Although physical and chemical conditions in aquatic systems that facilitate bloom development are well studied, there are fundamental gaps in the biological understanding of the microbial ecosystem that makes a cyanobacterial bloom. High-throughput sequencing was used to determine the drivers of cyanobacteria blooms in nature. Multiple functions and interactions important to consider in cyanobacterial bloom ecology were identified. The microbial biodiversity of blooms revealed microbial functions, genomic characteristics, and interactions between cyanobacterial populations that could be involved in bloom stability and more coherently define cyanobacteria blooms. Our results highlight the importance of considering cyanobacterial blooms as a microbial ecosystem to predict, prevent, and mitigate them.
KEYWORDS: cyanobacteria, blooms, microbial biodiversity, microbial interactions, metagenomics, Lake Okeechobee
INTRODUCTION
Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) are an increasingly recognized problem in freshwater lakes and reservoirs around the world (1, 2). They threaten the health of these ecosystems, causing hypoxia and disrupting food webs with negative impacts on the economy, domestic and wild animals, and public health (1, 3). Cyanotoxins (i.e., microcystins, cylindrospermopsins, saxitoxins, and anatoxins) produced by many species of cyanobacteria that bloom can alter the physiology of the aquatic biota, causing health problems in humans and animals ranging from rashes and gastrointestinal stress to respiratory paralysis and death (4). CyanoHABs occur primarily from nutrient enrichment derived from agricultural, industrial, and urban runoff (5).
Nutrients have been established as a major driver for cyanoHABs and cyanoHAB ecology. However, biological processes and the physical and chemical environment influence nutrient dynamics. The physical (e.g., hydrology, depth, and turbidity) and chemical (e.g., pH, alkalinity, and conductivity) properties of a lake essentially control cyanobacteria access to nutrients, altering nutrient bioavailability and mobilization, as well as exposure to light (6–8). Additionally, blooms are complex microbial ecosystems (9), composed of diverse microorganisms with different metabolic capabilities (10–12). Biological processes, e.g., the microbial nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), carbon (C), and sulfur (S) cycles, in freshwater and sediment ecosystems are also influential on nutrient bioavailability (9–13). Evaluating these dynamics is important in holistically understanding the effect of nutrients on cyanoHABs.
There is evidence for the role of microbial interactions in cyanoHABs. Shifts in both microbial composition and diversity occur during bloom formation and subsequent succession and decomposition (14–17). Microorganisms form tight associations with the cyanobacteria that bloom (18). They benefit from cyanobacteria-derived organic C (19), and there is evidence of their role in the availability of P, N, S, and growth factors, as well as oxidative stress protection (10, 15, 18, 20–22). Interactions among the cyanobacteria that bloom, as well as between cyanobacteria that do not bloom, also require consideration, both in culture and in situ. Temperature, light availability, and nutrient availability are key factors in cyanobacterial succession (5, 23, 24), but cyanobacteria genera or genotypes often co-occur (25–27) indicating coexistence or potential competition. Phages are also important in the dynamics with respect to microbial community structure and biogeochemical cycling (28) and affect bloom decline and microcystin release into the water (29, 30). Warming surface waters and the increased prevalence of extreme weather events are anticipated to affect the physical and chemical properties, as well as biological processes, in freshwater systems (31, 32). Characterizing these interconnected microbial relationships are essential for understanding cyanobacteria blooms and consequential for predicting, preventing, and mitigating future cyanoHABs in freshwater ecosystems.
To address these gaps in knowledge, this study was focused on the microbial ecosystem, notably those community interactions and processes that might be important in cyanobacteria blooms. Lake Okeechobee (Lake O; Fig. 1), the largest lake in the southeastern United States (ca. 14,000 km2), was selected as a model ecosystem to study. Lake O is a shallow, heavily managed, eutrophic, and subtropical lake located in South Florida in the United States and is susceptible to the impacts of warming temperatures, high winds, and heavy precipitations associated with tropical storms and hurricanes (33). Recurring and severe cyanoHABs in Lake O have been documented (33) and shown to be dominated by Microcystis sp., one of the most common toxic bloom-forming species in lakes around the world (34, 35). Microcystis blooms, widespread in Lake O, are linked to the blooms in two waterways receiving most of the outflow from the lake, namely, the Caloosahatchee River Estuary (CRE) and the St. Lucie River Estuary (SLRE), both leading to the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean, respectively (33, 35, 36). In 2016 and 2018, the size and intensity of blooms in these rivers were the cause of the State of Florida declaring a state of emergency, based on the severe economic and ecological impacts that expanded to the coastal oceans (35, 37).
Fig 1.
A map of Lake Okeechobee showing ecological zones and the sites sampled in this study. The color of the points corresponds to the ecological zone they represented in this study: dark blue closed circles = pelagic zone, light blue closed squares = nearshore zone, and green closed triangles = lake inflow. The shading on the map represents the boundaries of ecological zones that have been previously described: light blue = pelagic, orange = nearshore, and green = littoral zone. No samples from this study were collected from the littoral zone. The top left shows the relative position of the lake in Florida (USA) and sampling sites S79 and S80. Map of Lake Okeechobee adapted from reference 38 and modified in Adobe Illustrator (39). Inset created using MapMaker by National Geographic (40) and modified in Adobe Illustrator (39).
RESULTS
Microbial community dynamics of Lake O
The microbial community composition of Lake O was evaluated by sequencing 16S rRNA genes in 237 samples collected monthly for 1 year at monitored sites, located at the headwater of the Caloosahatchee River (CR, S77) and downstream on the CRE (S79) and SLRE (S80; Fig. 1; Table S1). The relative abundance of 7,735 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), representing unique taxa, revealed biogeographical patterns in the lake (Fig. 2a) that were distinct from CR, CRE, and SLRE (41) (analysis of similarity [ANOSIM]; R = 0.438, P = 0.001; Table S2). The differences detected in microbial community composition reflected previously described ecological zones, i.e., the pelagic and nearshore zones (42). Sites located closest to rivers and canals that deliver the greatest inflows to the lake could be distinguished from these zones (Table S2), hence defined as “lake inflow zone.” Differences observed in microbial community composition based on month (ANOSIM; R = 0.258, P = 0.001), season (ANOSIM; R = 0.128, P = 0.001), and site (ANOSIM; R = 0.280, P = 0.001) were significant, but not as strong as spatial patterns of the zones. The strongest differences in microbial community composition were observed when considering the interaction between zone and month (ANOSIM; R = 0.532, P = 0.001). Patterns in microbial community composition correlated to chlorophyll a (chl-a), phosphate (PO4), pH, conductivity, and Secchi depth (SD) (41; Fig. 2a; BEST analysis; R2 = 0.511, P = 0.001).
Fig 2.
Microbial community dynamics and environmental conditions in Lake O. (a) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis (2D stress: 0.17) depicting ecological zones as biogeographical patterns in microbial composition using Bray–Curtis similarities after square root transformation of relative abundances of ASVs from all samples collected from March 2019 to February 2020 from Lake O. Biological environmental stepwise (BEST) (41) analysis was used to determine the environmental variables that significantly correlated (Pearson R2 = 0.511, P = 0.001) to the patterns in microbial composition between samples. (b) NMDS (2D stress: 0.16) analysis depicting ecological zones as biogeographical patterns in functional composition from April 2019 to September 2019. Bray–Curtis similarities were generated for this analysis after square root transformation of copies per million (CPM) bioprocesses defined by Gene Ontology (GO) (43). BEST (41) analysis was used to determine the environmental variables that significantly correlated. (c) A comparison of the physical and chemical factors that corresponded to sample collection for microbial community analyses that differed between ecological zones. Black line represents the average. Pairwise comparisons were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunn’s test (*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, and ****P ≤ 0.0001). (d) Chlorophyll a concentration over time in ecological zones. Black line represents the average. Pairwise comparisons of ecological zones were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunn’s test (****P ≤ 0.0001). TP = total phosphorus, TN = total nitrogen, SD = Secchi depth.
Microbial community functional potential was examined using metagenomes generated from samples collected monthly between April 2019 and September 2019 in Lake O (Table S3; Data S1). Microbial community functional composition was more distinct in the ecological zones (Fig. 2b), which included the lake inflow zone (ANOSIM; R = 0.318, P, 0.001), when compared between sites (ANOSIM; R = 0.290, P = 0.001), month (ANOSIM; R = 0.079, P = 0.041), and season (ANOSIM; R = −0.096, P = 0.79). Chl-a, ammonium (NH4), SD, turbidity, and PO4 correlated to patterns in microbial community functional composition (Fig. 2b).
Accordingly, differences in microbial community composition and functional composition between zones corresponded to distinct chemical and physical characteristics (Fig. 2c). Lower nitrate (NO3) + nitrite (NO2), PO4, alkalinity, and conductivity were observed in the lake inflow zone compared to the other zones. The pelagic zone was more turbid yielding lower SD measurements, indicating reduced water clarity likely from sediment resuspension, coinciding with the highest total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), NO3, and PO4. The nearshore zone, with turbidity and SD values comparable to the lake inflow zone, indicated increased water clarity compared to the pelagic zone. The lake inflow zone also had higher chl-a concentration, which is a proxy for photosynthetic microorganism biomass, compared to other zones indicating a “hotspot” for blooms (Fig. 2d). The chl-a and cyanobacteria cell concentrations in the lake inflow zone suggested moderate to severe cyanoHABs (5–>50 µg/L chl-a, 10,000–>100,000 cells/mL; 44) from May to September (45; Fig. 2d; Fig. S1). Highest chl-a concentrations were observed in the pelagic zone during this time as well, whereas they were highest in the nearshore zone the following months. Phytoplankton cell counts supported the conclusion that the blooms were dominated by cyanobacteria (Fig. S1).
Dominant phyla in all ecological zones were Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Acidobacteria, and Thaumarchaeota, composing more than 95% of the microbial community (Fig. 3a). Differences in microbial community composition between zones were distinguished by the relative abundance of cyanobacteria (SIMPER) (41), with the highest abundance noted for the lake inflow zone. The most abundant functional pathways were involved in photosynthesis, C cycling, pigment production, energy generation, DNA replication and modification, and amino acid and vitamin biosynthesis (Fig. 3b). Differences in functional composition between zones were distinguished by several bioprocesses representing dominant functions of the lake, with the top drivers being photosynthetic electron transport in photosystem II and transposition (SIMPER).
Fig 3.
Microbial community composition and functional potential in Lake O. (a) The relative abundance of the top 10 phyla averaged for each month from March 2019 to February 2020 in each ecological zone. The remaining phyla in lower abundances are not shown. (b) The topmost abundant functional pathways shown as the log-transformed CPM of bioprocesses defined by Gene Ontology (43) across ecological zones.
The microbial community composition and function associated with blooms in Lake O
Cyanobacterial families that positively correlated with chl-a included Nodosilineaceae, Leptolyngbyaceae, Limnotrichaceae, and Nostocaceae (Fig. 4a) and non-cyanobacterial families Proteobacteria (R2 ≥ 0.5), namely, families A0839, Hyphomonadaceae, and Rhizobiaceae. The Chthoniobacteraceae (Verrucomicrobia), Caldilineaceae (Chloroflexi), Clostridiaceae (Firmicutes), Pirellulaceae (Planctomycetes), and Terrimicrobiaceae (Verrucomicrobia) were also found to be strongly correlated with chl-a. Negative correlations to chl-a were moderate and included Illumatobacteraceae (Actinobacteria), Gemmatimonadaceae (Gemmatimondetes), and Nitrosopumilaceae (Thaumarchaeota, Fig. 4a).
Fig 4.
Microbial community composition and functional potential associated with blooms. (a) The families identified in the 16S rRNA data collected from March 2019 to February 2020 that significantly correlated (Pearson R2 > 0.3 or <−0.3, P value <0.05) to chl-a concentration. (b) Pathways identified in metagenomes generated from samples collected from April 2019 to September 2019 classified by Gene Ontology bioprocesses that positively correlated with chl-a concentrations (Pearson R2, P < 0.05); a CPM of >3 in all samples; encoded processes for nutrient utilization, phage defense, and stress response; and supported microbial interactions.
Many functional pathways that positively correlated with chl-a were likely reflective of increased biomass expected with blooms, including chl-a biosynthesis, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, and others involved in energy, C, amino acid, and nucleotide metabolism (Data S1). Others could be indicative of differences in life strategies within the microbial community, including those that encode genes for meeting nutrient requirements, such as inorganic and organic N and P metabolism; storage of C as glycogen and polyhydroxybutyrate; storage of P as polyphosphates; vitamin biosynthesis, such as folic acid and pyridoxine; and S cycling (Fig. 4b). Other functions correlating to chl-a were pathways for flagellum and pili assembly; exopolysaccharide biosynthesis; Type III and IV secretion systems; machinery for phage defense, including DNA modification systems and DNA methylation; hydrogen peroxide catabolism; protein repair; and response to antibiotics (Fig. 4b).
Cyanobacterial diversity in Lake O
A total of 200 cyanobacterial ASVs were detected (Fig. S2a), most of which (120 of the 200) were assigned to the genus Cyanobium but may also represent Synechococcus or Vulcanococcus due to there being a poor resolution within the family Cyanobiaceae at the genus level. On average, these genera were the highest in relative abundance across all zones (Fig. S2b), along with Microcystis, Nodosilinea, Cupsidothrix, Cylindrospermopsis, Pseudanabaena, Limnolyngbya, Dolichospermum, and Synechocystis (Fig. S2a and c).
Thirty non-redundant (<99% average nucleotide identity) metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), >50% complete and <10% contamination, represented most of the cyanobacterial groups detected in the 16S rRNA sequencing (Fig. 5; Fig. S2a; Table S4). As concluded from the 16S rRNA gene data, the most diverse cyanobacterial MAGs were the family Cyanobiaceae (Fig. 5). Two were identified as Vulcanococcus sp. and 10 as Cyanobium spp., which were highest in relative abundance in the nearshore and pelagic zones (Fig. 5).
Fig 5.
Spatiotemporal trends in the relative abundances of cyanobacteria from samples capturing cyanobacterial bloom season (April–September 2019). MAGs are ordered based on phylogenetic placement using maximum likelihood phylogeny. Taxonomic classification associated with each MAG was determined from GTDB-Tk (46), and different colored circles represent different families of cyanobacteria. Chlorophyll a and cyanobacterial cell concentrations (cells/mL) for each sample are shown in the bottom panel. Any value below the green lines represents little to no bloom conditions. Any value above the green lines indicates the threshold for moderate blooms, and the red line and above indicate the threshold for severe bloom conditions (44).
Three MAGs included one Microcystis sp. and two Microcystis panniformis. Microcystis dominated or co-dominated with other cyanobacteria when the chl-a concentration indicated moderate blooms (5–50 μg/L) in the lake inflow and pelagic zones (Fig. 5; Data S2). The complete microcystin gene cassette was found in M. panniformis Bin196P, and a partial cassette was found in Microcystis sp. Bin196, indicating these were microcystin producers. Microcystins were the cyanotoxins detected in the highest quantities in Lake O in 2019 (Fig. S3).
Five MAGs annotated as Nodosilinea sp. formed a cyanobacteria clade highest in relative abundance in samples from the lake inflow zone of several blooms based on chl-a (>50 µg/L, Fig. 5). Leptolyngbyaceae species, closely related to this group, were also detected. Additional MAGs included Dolichospermum circinale, Pseudanabaena sp., and Prochlorotrichaceae in low relative abundance. No microcystin, saxitoxin, anatoxin, or cylindrospermopsin coding genes were detected in Nodosilinea, Pseudanabaena, Leptolyngbyaceae, Dolichospermum, or Prochlorotrichaceae. Intracellular cylindrospermopsins, anatoxins, and saxitoxins were detected (Fig. S3), but not the genes coding for their production.
Functional diversity of the Lake O cyanobacterial community
Cyanobacterial MAGs shared functional pathways, including photosynthesis, CO2 uptake, pigment production, and NH4, NO3, and PO4 metabolism (Fig. 6; Data S3). All cyanobacterial MAGs contained genes encoding urease and glycogen metabolism (Fig. 6).
Fig 6.
The functional potential of the cyanobacterial community in Lake O. The proportion of protein coding genes in functional pathways relative to the total number of protein coding genes in each cyanobacterial MAG. MAGs are ordered based on phylogenetic placement using maximum likelihood phylogeny, and the colors represent the family to which they belong.
Genes encoding for cyanophycin metabolism were detected in Microcystis, Dolichospermum, Pseudanabaena, Nodosilinea, Leptolyngbyaceae, and Prochlorotrichaceae (Fig. 6), but not in Vulcanococcus, Cyanobium, and other Cyanobiaceae MAGs. Classification of phage defense systems with Rapid Annotation for microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST) (47) and Defense Finder (48) indicated that phage defense systems were diverse across Lake O cyanobacteria. Most cyanobacteria encoding them had more than one, but they were differentially present across cyanobacterial genomes (Fig. 7a). CRISPR genes were present in only two Cyanobium but detected in Microcystis, D. circinale, Pseudanabaena, Leptolyngbyaceae, Prochlorotrichaceae, and three Nodosilinea genomes. While results for the presence of RMs differed between the two methods, fewer genes for RMs were observed in the picocyanobacteria (Cyanobium, Vulcanococcus, and other Cyanobiaceae) compared to bloom-forming cyanobacteria (Fig. 6 and 7a). The differences in the presence of CRISPRs and RMs were confirmed to be not related to missing sequence information or binning issues by analyzing an additional 369 publicly available genomes of previously sequenced and cultured cyanobacteria representing cyanobacterial families observed to be present in Lake O (Fig. S4). Most Cyanobium also had genes for phage argonautes (pAgos), as did Microcystis sp. Bin163 and Pseudanabaena.
Fig 7.
Phage defense systems and phage–cyanobacterial dynamics in Lake O. (a) The distribution and number of phage defense systems in the cyanobacteria of Lake O. (b) Co-occurrence networks based on correlative relationships between cyanophage and cyanobacteria using relative abundances of each genome. Red and blue edges connecting nodes represent positive (Pearson R2 > 0.3) and negative (Pearson R2 < −0.3) correlations, respectively. The nodes connected by thicker lines represent the MCL clusters determined. Photosynthesis genes found in a specific cyanophage are indicated: psbA encodes a core protein in photosystem II; hli = high-light inducible genes.
Characterization of Lake O cyanophages
Thirteen non-redundant (<99% average nucleotide identity) genomes were identified as families of Caudoviricetes (Myoviridae, Autographiviridae, and Siphoviridae) ranging from ~40 to 190 kbp (Fig. S5; Data S4). All were considered likely lytic phages since their genomes were not flanked by host DNA. Marker gene analysis and results from vConTACT2 suggested their hosts were picocyanobacteria, specifically Synechococcus (Fig. S5). Their genomes carried genes for DNA and RNA replication and modification, transfer RNAs, and nucleotide metabolism, including auxiliary metabolic genes, such as thymidylate synthase (thyX) and ribonucleotide reductase (49; Table S5). Some phage genomes from the families Autographiviridae and Myoviridae contained psbA, encoding a core protein in photosystem II, the most abundant pathway detected in Lake O. The phage genome in the Myoviridae family also contained ferredoxin, whereas phages from the Autographiviridae family contained high-light-inducible (hli) proteins. Additionally, the phage genome from Myoviridae family had phoH, a part of the Pho regulon for PO4 metabolism (50).
Several Cyanobium, Vulcanococcus, and Cyanobiaceae co-occurred with Autographiviridae genomes with psbA and high-light-inducible proteins (Fig. 7b). These MAGs also co-occurred with Siphoviridae genomes. Several cyanophages co-occurred with Microcystis and Pseudanabaena or Dolichospermum (Fig. 7b; Data S4). One Autographiviridae with psbA co-occurred with Microcystis. No cyanophage genomes co-occurred with Nodosilinea, Leptolyngbyaceae, or Prochlorotrichaceae MAGs (Fig. 7b).
DISCUSSION
Management practices and research on cyanoHABs have focused on controlling nutrient input, but other factors are involved in constraining cyanoHAB development and duration. The physical and chemical environments have had attention, and the biology of lakes experiencing cyanoHABs should also be considered. Microbial processes are key in biogeochemical cycling and ecosystem function, and studying blooms as a microbial ecosystem can help identify indicators for the processes and transformations that are important in bloom success (51). In this study, the microbial ecology of Lake O was analyzed in conjunction with the physical and chemical environmental parameters to identify holistically the drivers of cyanoHABs.
Microbial community dynamics reflect ecological zones and bloom hotspots in Lake O
Spatiotemporal resolution of the sampling carried out in this study offered a range of physical and chemical conditions influencing microbial community composition and functional potential. Both reflected biogeographical patterns representing ecological zones in Lake O, originally defined by physical, chemical, and macro-biological features (42, 52). Physical and chemical characteristics analyzed in this study from March 2019 to February 2020 were aligned with previous descriptions, namely, the pelagic zone having reduced water clarity and high nutrient concentration and the nearshore zone with high water clarity and lower nutrient concentration. Additionally, the microbial community dynamics were distinct at sites near major inflows into Lake O, defined as the lake inflow zone. The lake inflow zone included sites near the mouths of the Kissimmee River (KissR0.0), Indian Prairie Canal (Polesout), and Taylor Creek (LZ2) in the northwest part of the lake, which delivers the largest inflows into the lake that contains nutrient-rich water impacted by agriculture and animal farming (53, 54). Corresponding to differences in microbial community composition and functional potential, the chemistry at these sites was characteristic, namely, higher chl-a concentration, suggesting that lake inflow areas are “hotspots” for blooms. Rivers and canals flowing into Lake O are known to carry high nutrient loads. A low concentration of nutrients at the sites may result from increased cyanobacterial activity, where a drawdown of dissolved nutrients may be expected.
Microorganisms and functional potential associated with blooms
Both microbial community composition and functional potential were found to be correlated with chl-a, suggesting biological activities associated with the blooms. The extent of sampling provided a wide range of chl-a concentrations that represented a scale of bloom severity to determine which patterns were associated with blooms. Results of several studies have shown that microbial communities change according to cyanobacterial abundances and stage of bloom (14, 16, 17) and that changes can differ across an ecosystem (25). In Lake O, several non-cyanobacterial families were found to increase in relative abundance with increasing bloom severity. These were members of phyla that were previously detected during blooms and tightly associated with colonies (12, 25). Firmicutes and Proteobacteria have been shown to induce colony formation by Microcystis, promoting bacterial interactions (17, 19). Actinobacteria have been observed in high abundance in lakes where there were no blooms (55) and are more likely to be free-living rather than associated with Microcystis colonies (17). In Lake O, some negative associations with increased bloom severity were noted with Actinobacteria.
While changes in the composition of a microbial community associated with blooms, cyanobacterial aggregates (12, 25, 56), and genus of bloom former (17, 57) have been observed, microbial community functions during a bloom appear to be more conserved (17, 56). Functional pathways found to be correlated to chl-a in Lake O aligned with similar observations for other lakes. Bloom severity was found to be associated with genes encoding motility, biofilm formation, and exchange of metabolites and genetic material, indicating that microbial activities, such as chemotaxis, genome rearrangement, and horizontal gene transfer occur during blooms (18, 34, 58, 59). Several studies provide evidence of microbial communities being present during blooms or colonizing cyanobacterial aggregates that are also involved in N, P, C, and S cycling, fatty acid metabolism, and vitamin biosynthesis (10, 18, 20, 21, 25), which aligns with the results of the study reported here. It has been demonstrated that the catalase activity of heterotrophic bacteria support the fitness of strains of Microcystis by reducing oxidative stress (22). This is a mechanism possibly important for cyanoHAB resilience in Lake O, where increased hydrogen peroxide activity and pyridoxine biosynthetic processes were linked to bloom severity. Enrichment of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes has been associated with cyanoHABs (60, 61), which contributes to the dissemination of AMR genes in the environment. Indeed, urban and agriculture runoff is known to disseminate AMR genes in aquatic ecosystems in addition to being a source of nutrients (62, 63). Along with the increase in genes involved in responses to possible biological stressors, like phage infections, the functions associated with bloom severity in Lake O suggested that the microbial communities associated with blooms are more adaptable to dynamic environments. In general, this seems to be a quality of microbial communities across Lake O; transposition, which could promote adaptive evolution of these communities, and SOS response were two highly abundant functional pathways in all samples.
The enrichment of genes encoding for nutrient storage with increasing chl-a also supports that the microbial communities are more resilient in blooms. The production of molecules to store C and P can allow bacteria to persist in environments with fluctuating nutrient supplies (64, 65) and during times of nutrient limitation, providing an important message with respect to monitoring of relationships between nutrients and blooms. That is, more biomass may not always correspond to more nutrients, and reducing nutrients may not always correspond to reduced biomass, at least over short timescales (66). This physiological aspect of potential nutrient storage associated with blooms should be considered in modeling and forecasting cyanoHABs.
The cyanobacteria of Lake O are taxonomically and functionally diverse
Cyanobacteria present in Lake O were identified and characterized using molecular tools revealing the diversity of picocyanobacteria, Microcystis species, and other potential bloom formers in Lake O. In the past several years, blooms of Microcystis reported in Lake O have received the most attention due to their negative impact on the CRE and SLRE, which receive outflows from Lake O (33, 35, 37). The Microcystis species found to dominate in the lake during sampling was M. panniformis. Interestingly, while Microcystis was present and presumed to contribute to the moderate blooms in the lake inflow and pelagic zones, dominant bloom formers in Lake O in our sampling were the filamentous cyanobacteria. MAGs representing Nodosilinea sp. were of the highest relative abundance during more severe blooms. Blooms caused by Nodosilinea have not been reported to occur on Lake O but were reported elsewhere (67). The Leptolyngbyaceae family, to which Nodosilinea belongs, is known to be polyphyletic and has a taxonomy difficult to resolve. Historically, other filamentous taxa have been reported to be part of blooms in Lake O, namely, Lyngbya (68). Thus, such blooms have been overlooked or possibly represent a novel bloom community in Lake O, containing genotypes of filamentous non-N2 fixing cyanobacteria.
MAGs representing picocyanobacteria in Lake O were highly diverse and in high relative abundances when blooms were least severe, notably in the nearshore zone, aligning with an assumption that picocyanobacteria are not associated with blooms in lakes (69). High relative abundance of active picocyanobacteria has been reported to occur in other eutrophic lakes, and they are recognized as important contributors to ecosystem function (70). However, they are not usually considered in the analyses of bloom ecology, despite their importance in biogeochemical cycles in these ecosystems and blooms in coastal marine ecosystems (71). Some studies suggest that picocyanobacteria can outcompete bloom-forming cyanobacteria under certain conditions because of their faster growth rates and lower nutrient requirements (72–75). The co-occurrence of picocyanobacteria and bloom-forming cyanobacteria, such as Nodosilinea, Prochlorotrichaceae, Leptolynbyaceae, and Dolichospermum, in this study, indicated that they do at times co-exist and likely compete for resources. Thus, understanding how they co-exist or are outcompeted by bloom-forming cyanobacteria may shed light on cyanoHAB ecology and warrants further investigation.
Storage of N via cyanophycin was a distinctive trait missing from Lake O picocyanobacteria. Cyanophycin is postulated to provide a competitive advantage to those cyanobacteria that bloom, such as Microcystis. However, this has not been confirmed experimentally. In studies of a Synechocystis sp., cyanophycin provided wild-type cells an advantage over a cyanophycin mutant during fluctuating N supply and N-limiting conditions (76). In dynamic environments, like Lake O, which are shallow, experience regular mixing, and are frequently N-limited, this is an advantage. Interestingly, Synechococcus has been associated with low N in other eutrophic lakes (25) and fast growth rates under low N conditions (75). The lack of cyanophycin may reflect the differences in lifestyle strategy and nutrient requirements between these organisms and highlight what may regulate this relationship.
Differences in phage defense mechanisms of Lake O cyanobacteria were also observed. Bloom-forming cyanobacteria were more enriched in CRISPRs and RMs in general, whereas phage defense mechanisms in picocyanobacteria, if they possessed them at all, were less abundant. Bloom-forming cyanobacteria are known to possess diverse antiphage defense systems, including CRISPRs (77, 78), and the lack of CRISPRs in picocyanobacteria is not a new observation (79). The results from this study support this, while also demonstrating that phage defense systems are generally fewer in picocyanobacteria. This suggested that the ability to defend against phage, specifically through these mechanisms, is an advantage for bloom-forming cyanobacteria (77–79).
Phage defense systems were diverse across the cyanobacterial population in Lake O. Additionally, genes for phage defense systems with different mechanisms were present, including those involved in nucleic acid degradation, such as CRISPR, RMs, phage argonautes (pAgos), bacteriophage exclusion, and SspBCDE (48) and abortive infection and the like, such as AbiE, AbiU, and dynamins (Fig. 7) (48, 80). Indeed, some of these systems have dual functionality, such as CRISPRs and pAgos, of which both offer sequence-specific defense (81). Others were previously described as toxin–antitoxin systems, such as ShosTA, PsyrTA, and DarTG, while the mechanisms of many others with confirmed phage defense remain unclear (48, 82, 83). The diversity of phage defense systems is likely a consequence of host–phage co-evolution and may provide increased host resistance to one phage or a wider range of phages and prevent the emergence of resistant phage (84). The important role of cyanophage in bloom ecology has been recognized previously (29, 30). However, these observations highlight the importance of phages as a constraint on co-existing and competing cyanobacteria in Lake O, while also suggesting that the diversity of specific defense systems may be involved in the succession and proliferation of specific cyanobacteria that bloom (79).
A role for cyanophage that infects picocyanobacteria in blooms
Following the observation of differential phage defense mechanisms in the cyanobacteria of Lake O, several phages that infect picocyanobacteria were recovered. Some phages contained auxiliary metabolic genes that can alter cellular metabolism, specifically some involved in photosynthesis, further highlighting the role of phage in the ecology of Lake O picocyanobacteria. The co-occurrence of phages with Microcystis, Dolichospermum, and Pseudanabaena suggested infection of picocyanobacteria was correlated with higher abundances of cyanobacteria that bloom. This suggests that infection of picocyanobacteria, whose phage defense mechanisms are fewer and less specific, may positively impact bloom-forming taxa. This dynamic supports the “kill-the-winner” hypothesis (85, 86) in bloom ecology, which has been suggested in previous work (87). In this case, picocyanobacteria would be the best competitor whose abundances are maintained at a certain threshold due to phage infection, and bloom-forming taxa would be the defense specialist who are more equipped to evade phage infection and thus outcompete the picocyanobacteria (85–87). Quantitative evaluation of phage infection and bacterial protection dynamics could shed light on this hypothesis. Phage–host relationships are complex on their own, and the role of CRISPRs and other phage defense in kill-the-winner is unclear (86). However, there is a clear trade-off between having more phage defense systems and competition (86). Thus, these observations offer some insight into the complex interactions, including the on-going battle between phage and cyanobacterial host, in microbial ecosystems influencing the ability of specific cyanobacteria to bloom.
Conclusions
This study focused on changes in microbial community composition and functional potential related to specific processes and interactions influencing cyanobacterial blooms in addition to the physical and chemical environment alone. Microbial interactions between heterotrophic microorganisms and cyanobacteria, often overlooked in cyanobacterial bloom ecology of Lake O, are important influences on cyanoHABs. Cyanobacterial blooms are best studied as a microbial ecosystem rather than solely a collection of bloom-forming taxa in a lake. Routine quantification of the microbial ecosystem may represent an important component to measure in addition to the physical and chemical parameters of the lake. By including the biology of a cyanobacterial bloom in Lake O, the knowledge of this ecosystem is expanded beyond nutrient analysis and highlights the complexity within a microbial ecosystem. Information about the microbial functions and interactions, as well as the role of phage coould enhance the understanding of the entire system and processes to allow effective prediction, prevention, and mitigation of blooms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection and DNA extraction
Surface water dip samples at 0.05 m depth were collected monthly by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) using a decontaminated bottle (washed with hot water and Liquinox soap, rinsed with tap water three times, rinsed with 10% (wt/wt) hydrochloric acid, and rinsed with analyte free water three times) at 19 sites in Lake O from March 2019 to February 2020 (Fig. 1; Table S1). The U.S. Geological Survey in Orlando, FL, collected surface water at sites S-79 on the CRE and S-80 on the SLRE. Water samples were stored on ice and shipped overnight to the USGS Caribbean–Florida Water Science Center where the water samples were filtered in 0.22 µm Sterivex cartridges (Millipore, SVGP01050), frozen and stored at −20°C, and transported on ice to Nova Southeastern University in Dania Beach, FL. The Sterivex cartridges were carefully opened using a pipe cutter, and the filter was removed. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, 12855-100) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Blank “reagent-only” extractions were performed. All environmental data including chl-a (µg/L), SD (cm), total suspended solids (mg/L), turbidity (NTU), alkalinity (as total CaCO3), NH4 (mg/L), color (PTU), depth (m), DO (mg/L), NO3 (mg/L), NO3 + NO2 (mg/L), pH, PO4 (mg/L), conductivity, temperature (°Celsius), TN (mg/L), TP (mg/L), and volatile suspended solids (mg/L) were downloaded from the DBHYDRO SFWMD environmental database that stores historic and current hydrologic, meteorologic, hydrogeologic, and water quality data (https://www.sfwmd.gov/science-data/dbhydro) collected at the same date and time of the sample collection for DNA analyses.
16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and analysis
Purified DNA was amplified following the 16S Illumina amplicon protocol recommended by the Earth Microbiome Project (88) as previously used (89, 90). Briefly, barcoded primers 515F and 806R (88) were used to amplify the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene (https://earthmicrobiome.org/protocols-and-standards/16s/). Initial bioinformatic analysis was performed within the Qiime2 (version 2019.10) environment (91). Forward and reverse reads were paired and demultiplexed, and dada2 was used to trim forward and reverse reads based on their quality profiles, merge paired reads, filter forward and reverse reads based on total read quality (q-score >29), and check for chimeras (“consensus”). The identification of taxa was assigned to ASVs using the silva classifier (silva-132-99-515-806-nb-classifier). Mitochondrial and chloroplast ASVs and ASVs in sample extraction reagent blanks were removed for downstream analysis. Relative abundances of ASVs were determined in R (92) using the vegan package (93) function decostand after the removal of singletons, doubletons, and ASVs that were represented in less than 0.01% of samples using colSums.
Multivariate statistical analyses using the relative abundances of ASVs were performed in Primer-E (v7) (41), including NMDS and ANOSIM for identifying dissimilarities between groups, SIMPER for identifying what variables contribute to the greatest differences between groups, and BEST, which identifies environmental factors that correlate to microbial community and functional composition (41). Nearshore and pelagic sites were assigned a zone based on previous literature (94). Since zones do not have geographically defined borders, sites near the transition of the pelagic and nearshore zones were assigned based on which zone they were more similar to using ANOSIM results.
Relative abundances of families and chl-a concentrations were correlated (Pearson R2) in R (92) using the package “Hmisc (95)” and the command “rcorr.” The heatmap displaying families that correlated to chl-a was created using ggplot2 (96) package in R (92) using relative abundances of each family square root transformed for visualization purposes.
Metagenomic sequencing and bioinformatic processing
Seventy-one DNA samples from Lake O were chosen for metagenomic sequencing (Table S3). DNA was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeqX with 150 bp paired-end reads. Raw reads were uploaded for taxonomic annotation on the CosmosID-HUB using a patented and benchmarked kmer-based algorithm against the database GenBook (https://docs.cosmosid.com/docs/metagenomic-classification). For additional analyses, sequencing reads were filtered and trimmed for quality and adapter removal using bbduk (97) (min = 25, qtrim = rl, trimq = 20) and then co-assembled by location using MEGAHIT (98) (kmer = 55, 77, 99; Table S3). To preserve genome variability across the lake but reduce redundancy in recovered MAGs, co-assemblies by site were performed due to the strong spatial trends observed in the microbial community composition elucidated in the 16S rRNA gene sequencing data.
Metagenome functional analysis
Reads were functionally annotated (https://docs.cosmosid.com/docs/methods#functional-classification-methods) in the CosmosID-HUB Microbiome Platform as previously described (99–101). Briefly, reads passing quality checks were searched against the protein sequence database, UniRef90 (102), to assign gene families using HUMAnN2. Reads were mapped to representative gene sequences and weighed by mapping quality, coverage, and gene sequence length to estimate community-wide weighted gene family abundances (103). Detailed information on mapping quality and coverage can be found in Franzosa et al. (103). Gene families were then regrouped to establish GO terms and determine their abundances. The abundance values were normalized using total-sum scaling (104) normalization to produce CPM units.
CPM of the most abundant GO term representing biological processes (CPM > 3 across all samples) and chl-a concentrations were correlated (Pearson R2) in R (92) using the package “Hmisc (95)” and the command “rcorr.” The heatmap to display functions involved in nutrient cycling, biological defense, and stress response was created using the ggplot2 (96) package in R (92) using copies per million of each pathway and square root transformed for visualization purposes.
MAG recovery and analysis
Contig binning for each co-assembly, quality checks, and annotation was performed using apps within the Kbase platform (105). MetaBAT2 (106) and Maxbin2 (107) were used to assign contigs from each assembly to bins, and these bins were optimized using DAS Tool (108). Bins were filtered for quality with CheckM (109). Cyanobacterial MAGs (>50% complete with <10% contamination) were dereplicated at 99% average nucleotide identity (dRep) (110). GTDB-Tk (46) and the SpeciesTreeBuilder app, which uses FastTree2 (111) to build a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree, were used for taxonomic classification and phylogenetic placement of dereplicated bins. Prodigal (112) and RAST (47) were used to identify and functionally annotate open reading frames (ORFs). View Functional Profile was used to determine the proportion of protein coding genes in a functional pathway relative to the total number of protein coding genes in each MAG. Reference genomes of cyanobacterial families identified in Lake O came from NCBI directly through KBase (105) and were annotated using RAST-Tk, and the phylogenetic relationships of cyanobacteria with different functions were observed using the SpeciesTreeBuilder app. Cyanobacterial MAGs were searched for phage defense systems using Defense Finder (https://defensefinder.mdmlab.fr/) (48).
Cyanobacterial MAGs and metagenomic assemblies were searched for cyanotoxin genes using a translated blast approach. Nucleotide sequences of the MAGs were searched against a database of protein sequences with verified function encoding McyD for microcystins, SxtA for saxitoxins, CyrK for cylindrospermopsins, and AnaC for anatoxins using BLASTx. Candidate sequences were then screened against the nr database using BLASTx to confirm their homology to the designated protein.
Paired-end reads were competitively mapped to each MAG from each sample using the Bowtie2 (113) v2.32 app in Kbase (105), which outputs alignment statistics, including average coverage. The average coverage of contigs in a MAG was averaged to achieve the average coverage for each MAG. Relative abundances were calculated using the average coverage of each MAG divided by the total number of reads for each sample (Data S2).
Detection, validation, and analysis of cyanophage
Viral signatures in metagenome co-assemblies were detected in Virsorter1.0.5 (114) in Kbase (105). Contigs in categories 1, 2, 4, and 5 were assessed for completeness and quality using CheckV (85). Contigs that were >90% complete and >10,000 bp and identified as high quality were found only in categories 1 and 2. Putative viral genomes were additionally assessed for host range by manually annotating ORFs with RAST-Tk and aligning all called ORFs to the nr database (115) (as of 29 March 2022) using BLASTp to confirm the contigs were viral and identify terminase, capsid, and ribonucleotide reductase marker genes (116). vConTACT2 (117) was used to confirm host identities from these annotations. Viral genomes were run through Genomad web application at https://nmdc-edge.org/home (118) for viral taxonomy. Additional phylogenetic analysis was performed to achieve higher resolution (118) of taxonomy and support host calls. Newly identified terminase sequences and all reference terminase sequences from UniProt (102) (clustered at 97% identity using CD-HIT) were aligned using MAFFT (119) and trimmed with trimAI (120) (gap threshold = 0.8). A maximum likelihood tree was built to visualize the relationships of the terminase sequences with FastTree2 (117). Phage abundances were determined using the same methods as the MAG abundances. Relative abundances of cyanobacteria and putative cyanophage were correlated (Pearson R2) in R (92) using the package “Hmisc” (95) and the command “rcorr.” Significant correlations (R2 > 0.3, R2 < −0.3, P < 0.05) were used for generating MCLusters (121) in co-occurrence networks visualized in Cytoscape (122).
Phytoplankton counts and toxin measurements
Total anatoxins, cylindrospermopsins, microcystins/nodularins (SAES-ADDA), and saxitoxins were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Eurofins Abraxis, Inc., Warminster, PA, USA) as described in Loftin et al. (123, 124) and Graham et al. (125).
Live samples were sent to PhycoTech, Inc. (St. Joseph, MI; https://www.phycotech.com/) for identification and enumeration of phytoplanktons. An aliquot of 125 mL of the original sample was transferred into a plastic amber bottle for live algal analysis. The bottles were placed in a cooler on ice and shipped overnight to PhycoTech, Inc., where the live samples are run through an Imaging FlowCytobot (McLane Research Labs).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thanks are given to the South Florida Water Management District for the sample collections.
Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
This work was supported by the Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Program of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center and the U.S. Geological Survey Environmental Health Program.
Contributor Information
Lauren E. Krausfeldt, Email: lkrausfe@nova.edu.
Holly Bik, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
All 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data, metagenomic data, and metagenome-assembled cyanobacterial and viral genomes are available under the BioProject PRJNA813570 (available at NCBI). Phytoplankton cell concentrations and cyanotoxin concentrations are available elsewhere (45). All environmental data used in this study are publicly available on DBHydro (http://my.sfwmd.gov/dbhydroplsql/show_dbkey_info.main_menu).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00709-23.
Gene ontology bioprocesses in Lake Okeechobee.
Cyanobacteria metagenome assembled genome abundances and environmental metadata associated with metagenome samples.
Abundances of pathways within each cyanobacterial metagenome assembled genome from Lake Okeechobee.
Cyanophage genome abundances and information in Lake Okeechobee.
Figures S1-S5.
Information for 16S rRNA amplicon libraries from samples collected in Lake Okeechobee from March 2019 to February 2020.
ANOSIM comparing dissimilarities in microbial community composition across ecological zones in Lake Okeechobee.
Summary information for all metagenomes collected in Lake Okeechobee in 2019.
Cyanobacterial metagenome assembled genome (MAG) statistics and information.
Auxiliary metabolic genes present in picocyanobacterial cyanophage genomes recovered from metagenomes from Lake Okeechobee in 2019.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Huisman J, Codd GA, Paerl HW, Ibelings BW, Verspagen JMH, Visser PM. 2018. Cyanobacterial blooms. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:471–483. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0040-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ho JC, Michalak AM, Pahlevan N. 2019. Widespread global increase in intense lake phytoplankton blooms since the 1980s. Nature 574:667–670. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1648-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sanseverino I, Conduto D, Pozzoli L, Dobricic S, Lettieri T. 2016. Algal bloom and its economic impact. European Commission, Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability [Google Scholar]
- 4. Carmichael WW, Boyer GL. 2016. Health impacts from cyanobacteria harmful algae blooms: implications for the North American great lakes. Harmful Algae 54:194–212. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2016.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Paerl HW, Scott JT, McCarthy MJ, Newell SE, Gardner WS, Havens KE, Hoffman DK, Wilhelm SW, Wurtsbaugh WA. 2016. It takes two to tango: when and where dual nutrient (N & P) reductions are needed to protect lakes and downstream ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 50:10805–10813. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Matson PG, Boyer GL, Bridgeman TB, Bullerjahn GS, Kane DD, McKay RML, McKindles KM, Raymond HA, Snyder BK, Stumpf RP, Davis TW. 2020. Physical drivers facilitating a toxigenic cyanobacterial bloom in a major great lakes tributary. Limnol Oceanogr 65:2866–2882. doi: 10.1002/lno.11558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Raven JA, Gobler CJ, Hansen PJ. 2020. Dynamic CO2 and pH levels in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters: theoretical and observed effects on harmful algal blooms. Harmful Algae 91:101594. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2019.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Havens KE, Ji G, Beaver JR, Fulton RS, Teacher CE. 2019. Dynamics of cyanobacteria blooms are linked to the hydrology of shallow Florida lakes and provide insight into possible impacts of climate change. Hydrobiologia 829:43–59. doi: 10.1007/s10750-017-3425-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pound HL, Martin RM, Sheik CS, Steffen MM, Newell SE, Dick GJ, McKay RML, Bullerjahn GS, Wilhelm SW. 2021. Environmental studies of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms should include interactions with the dynamic microbiome. Environ Sci Technol 55:12776–12779. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Li Q, Lin F, Yang C, Wang J, Lin Y, Shen M, Park MS, Li T, Zhao J. 2018. A large-scale comparative metagenomic study reveals the functional interactions in six bloom-forming Microcystis-epibiont communities. Front Microbiol 9:746. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Penn K, Wang J, Fernando SC, Thompson JR. 2014. Secondary metabolite gene expression and interplay of bacterial functions in a tropical freshwater cyanobacterial bloom. ISME J 8:1866–1878. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cook KV, Li C, Cai H, Krumholz LR, Hambright KD, Paerl HW, Steffen MM, Wilson AE, Burford MA, Grossart H-P, Hamilton DP, Jiang H, Sukenik A, Latour D, Meyer EI, Padisák J, Qin B, Zamor RM, Zhu G. 2020. The global Microcystis interactome. Limnol Oceanogr 65:S194–S207. doi: 10.1002/lno.11361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Porter K, Paerl H, Hodson R, Pace M, Priscu J, Riemann B, Scavia D, Stockner J. 1988. Microbial interactions in lake food webs, p 209–227. In Complex interactions in Lake communities. Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Woodhouse JN, Kinsela AS, Collins RN, Bowling LC, Honeyman GL, Holliday JK, Neilan BA. 2016. Microbial communities reflect temporal changes in cyanobacterial composition in a shallow ephemeral freshwater lake. ISME J 10:1337–1351. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wang K, Mou X, Cao H, Struewing I, Allen J, Lu J. 2021. Co-occurring microorganisms regulate the succession of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms. Environ Pollut 288:117682. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhu C, Zhang J, Wang X, Yang Y, Chen N, Lu Z, Ge Q, Jiang R, Zhang X, Yang Y, Chen T. 2021. Responses of cyanobacterial aggregate microbial communities to algal blooms. Water Res 196:117014. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pascault N, Rué O, Loux V, Pédron J, Martin V, Tambosco J, Bernard C, Humbert J-F, Leloup J. 2021. Insights into the cyanosphere: capturing the respective metabolisms of cyanobacteria and chemotrophic bacteria in natural conditions? Environ Microbiol Rep 13:364–374. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Pérez-Carrascal OM, Tromas N, Terrat Y, Moreno E, Giani A, Corrêa Braga Marques L, Fortin N, Shapiro BJ. 2021. Single-colony sequencing reveals microbe-by-microbiome phylosymbiosis between the cyanobacterium Microcystis and its associated bacteria. Microbiome 9:194. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01140-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Seymour JR, Amin SA, Raina J-B, Stocker R. 2017. Zooming in on the phycosphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton–bacteria relationships. Nat Microbiol 2:17065. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Xie M, Ren M, Yang C, Yi H, Li Z, Li T, Zhao J. 2016. Metagenomic analysis reveals symbiotic relationship among bacteria in Microcystis-dominated community. Front Microbiol 7:56. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hoke AK, Reynoso G, Smith MR, Gardner MI, Lockwood DJ, Gilbert NE, Wilhelm SW, Becker IR, Brennan GJ, Crider KE, Farnan SR, Mendoza V, Poole AC, Zimmerman ZP, Utz LK, Wurch LL, Steffen MM. 2021. Genomic signatures of lake Erie bacteria suggest interaction in the Microcystis phycosphere. PLoS One 16:e0257017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Smith DJ, Berry MA, Cory RM, Johengen TH, Kling GW, Davis TW, Dick GJ. 2022. Heterotrophic bacteria dominate catalase expression during Microcystis blooms. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0254421. doi: 10.1128/aem.02544-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Paerl HW, Huisman J. 2008. Blooms like it hot. Science 320:57–58. doi: 10.1126/science.1155398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Bonilla S, Aubriot L, Soares MCS, González-Piana M, Fabre A, Huszar VLM, Lürling M, Antoniades D, Padisák J, Kruk C. 2012. What drives the distribution of the bloom-forming cyanobacteria Planktothrix agardhii and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii? FEMS Microbiol Ecol 79:594–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01242.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jankowiak JG, Gobler CJ. 2020. The composition and function of microbiomes within Microcystis colonies are significantly different than native bacterial assemblages in two North American lakes. Front Microbiol 11:1016. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Li H, Alsanea A, Barber M, Goel R. 2019. High-throughput DNA sequencing reveals the dominance of pico-and other filamentous cyanobacteria in an urban freshwater Lake. Sci Total Environ 661:465–480. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Rosen BH, Davis TW, Gobler CJ, Kramer BJ, Loftin KA. 2017. Cyanobacteria of the 2016 Lake Okeechobee and Okeechobee waterway harmful algal bloom, p 2331–1258. US geological survey. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zimmerman AE, Howard-Varona C, Needham DM, John SG, Worden AZ, Sullivan MB, Waldbauer JR, Coleman ML. 2020. Metabolic and biogeochemical consequences of viral infection in aquatic ecosystems. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:21–34. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0270-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Steffen MM, Davis TW, McKay RML, Bullerjahn GS, Krausfeldt LE, Stough JMA, Neitzey ML, Gilbert NE, Boyer GL, Johengen TH, Gossiaux DC, Burtner AM, Palladino D, Rowe MD, Dick GJ, Meyer KA, Levy S, Boone BE, Stumpf RP, Wynne TT, Zimba PV, Gutierrez D, Wilhelm SW. 2017. Ecophysiological examination of the Lake Erie Microcystis bloom in 2014: linkages between biology and the water supply shutdown of Toledo, OH. Environ Sci Technol 51:6745–6755. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. McKindles KM, Manes MA, DeMarco JR, McClure A, McKay RM, Davis TW, Bullerjahn GS. 2020. Dissolved microcystin release coincident with lysis of a bloom dominated by Microcystis spp. In Western Lake Erie attributed to a novel cyanophage. Appl Environ Microbiol 86:e01397-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01397-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chapra SC, Boehlert B, Fant C, Bierman VJ, Henderson J, Mills D, Mas DML, Rennels L, Jantarasami L, Martinich J, Strzepek KM, Paerl HW. 2017. Climate change impacts on harmful algal blooms in US freshwaters: a screening-level assessment. Environ Sci Technol 51:8933–8943. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. O’Neil JM, Davis TW, Burford MA, Gobler CJ. 2012. The rise of harmful cyanobacteria blooms: the potential roles of eutrophication and climate change. Harmful Algae 14:313–334. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Heil CA, Muni-Morgan AL. 2021. Florida’s harmful algal bloom (HAB) problem: escalating risks to human, environmental and economic health with climate change. Front Ecol Evol 9:646080. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.646080 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Harke MJ, Steffen MM, Gobler CJ, Otten TG, Wilhelm SW, Wood SA, Paerl HW. 2016. A review of the global ecology, genomics, and biogeography of the toxic cyanobacterium, Microcystis spp. Harmful Algae 54:4–20. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2015.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Krimsky LS, Phlips EJ, Havens K. 2018. A response to frequently asked questions about the 2018 Lake Okeechobee, Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie rivers and estuaries algal blooms: ED-2/SG159, 8/2018. EDIS 2018. doi: 10.32473/edis-sg159-2018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kramer BJ, Davis TW, Meyer KA, Rosen BH, Goleski JA, Dick GJ, Oh G, Gobler CJ. 2018. Nitrogen limitation, toxin synthesis potential, and toxicity of cyanobacterial populations in Lake Okeechobee and the St. Lucie river estuary, Florida, during the 2016 state of emergency event. PLoS One 13:e0196278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Metcalf JS, Banack SA, Wessel RA, Lester M, Pim JG, Cassani JR, Cox PA. 2021. Toxin analysis of freshwater cyanobacterial and marine harmful algal blooms on the west coast of Florida and implications for estuarine environments. Neurotox Res 39:27–35. doi: 10.1007/s12640-020-00248-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Gray P. 2021. Optimizing LOSOM’s preferred alternative to protect Lake Okeechobee health. Available from: https://fl.audubon.org/sites/default/files/optimizing_losom_alternative_110521-4.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjvpJ_448eGAxUDv4kEHXg0DZgQFnoECA4QAw&usg=AOvVaw2LxCsLmFhYFhCLjVWMi5ip
- 39. Adobe Inc . 2020. Adobe Illustrator, Version 24.3. Available from: https://adobe.com/products/illustrator. Retrieved 1 Aug 2020.
- 40. Geographic N. 2020. MapMaker, Version 2.0. Available from: https://www.nationalgeographic.org/society/education-resources/mapmaker-launch-guide. Retrieved 1 Aug 2020.
- 41. Clarke K, Gorley R. 2015. PRIMER ver7: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-e. Quest Research Limited, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Havens KE, Steinman AD. 2015. Ecological responses of a large shallow lake (Okeechobee, Florida) to climate change and potential future hydrologic regimes. Environ Manage 55:763–775. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0189-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomax J, Ashburner M, Foulger R, Eilbeck K, Lewis S, Marshall B, Mungall C, et al. 2004. The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D258–D261. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. E.P.A . 2016. U.S. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-06/documents/hab_response_strategy.pdf
- 45. Mazzei V, Sullivan K. 2022. Monthly phytoplankton taxonomic quantification in Lake Okeechobee and the Okeechobee waterway. doi: 10.5066/P9QOJ4JZ [DOI]
- 46. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH, Hancock J. 2020. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. In Bioinformatics. Oxford University Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC genomics 9:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tesson F, Hervé A, Mordret E, Touchon M, d’Humières C, Cury J, Bernheim A. 2022. Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes. Nat Commun 13:2561. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30269-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Breitbart M, Bonnain C, Malki K, Sawaya NA. 2018. Phage puppet masters of the marine microbial realm. Nat Microbiol 3:754–766. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0166-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kim SK, Makino K, Amemura M, Shinagawa H, Nakata A. 1993. Molecular analysis of the phoH gene, belonging to the phosphate regulon in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 175:1316–1324. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.5.1316-1324.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Paerl HW, Dyble J, Moisander PH, Noble RT, Piehler MF, Pinckney JL, Steppe TF, Twomey L, Valdes LM. 2003. Microbial indicators of aquatic ecosystem change: current applications to eutrophication studies. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 46:233–246. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00200-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Phlips EJ, Aldridge FJ, Hansen P, Zimba PV, Ihnat J, Conroy M, Ritter P. 1993. Spatial and temporal variability of trophic state parameters in a shallow subtropical Lake (Lake Okeechobee, Florida, USA). Archiv_hydrobiologie 128:437–458. doi: 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/128/1993/437 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ma P, Zhang L, Mitsch WJ. 2020. Investigating sources and transformations of nitrogen using dual stable Isotopes for Lake Okeechobee restoration in Florida. Ecol Eng 155:105947. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105947 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Reddy KR, Flaig EG, Graetz DA. 1996. Phosphorus storage capacity of uplands, wetlands and streams of the Lake Okeechobee Watershed, Florida. Agric Ecosyst Environ 59:203–216. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(96)01039-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Pal M, Yadav S, Kapley A, Qureshi A. 2021. Impact of cyanobacterial bloom on microbiomes of freshwater lakes. J Biosci 46:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12038-021-00220-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Steffen MM, Li Z, Effler TC, Hauser LJ, Boyer GL, Wilhelm SW. 2012. Comparative metagenomics of toxic freshwater cyanobacteria bloom communities on two continents. PLoS One 7:e44002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Louati I, Pascault N, Debroas D, Bernard C, Humbert J-F, Leloup J. 2015. Structural diversity of bacterial communities associated with bloom-forming freshwater cyanobacteria differs according to the cyanobacterial genus. PLoS One 10:e0140614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Smith DJ, Kharbush JJ, Kersten RD, Dick GJ. 2022. Uptake of phytoplankton-derived carbon and cobalamins by novel Acidobacteria genera in Microcystis blooms inferred from metagenomic and metatranscriptomic evidence. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0180321. doi: 10.1128/aem.01803-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wang Z, Zeng Y, Cheng K, Cai Z, Zhou J. 2022. The quorum sensing system of Novosphingobium sp. ERN07 regulates aggregate formation that promotes cyanobacterial growth. Sci Total Environ 851:158354. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Lu T, Peijnenburg WJGM, Gillings M, Yang X, Chen J, Penuelas J, Zhu Y-G, Zhou N-Y, Su J, Qian H. 2020. Cyanobacterial blooms contribute to the diversity of antibiotic-resistance genes in aquatic ecosystems. Commun Biol 3:737. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01468-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Wang Z, Chen Q, Zhang J, Guan T, Chen Y, Shi W. 2020. Critical roles of cyanobacteria as reservoir and source for antibiotic resistance genes. Environ Int 144:106034. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Bougnom BP, Piddock LJV. 2017. Wastewater for urban agriculture: a significant factor in dissemination of antibiotic resistance. ACS Publications 51:5863–5864. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Marti E, Variatza E, Balcazar JL. 2014. The role of aquatic ecosystems as reservoirs of antibiotic resistance. Trends Microbiol. 22:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Doello S, Klotz A, Makowka A, Gutekunst K, Forchhammer K. 2018. A specific glycogen mobilization strategy enables rapid awakening of dormant cyanobacteria from chlorosis. Plant Physiol. 177:594–603. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Shi X, Yang L, Niu X, Xiao L, Kong Z, Qin B, Gao G. 2003. Intracellular phosphorus metabolism of Microcystis aeruginosa under various redox potential in darkness. Microbiol Res 158:345–352. doi: 10.1078/0944-5013-00214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Glibert PM. 2017. Eutrophication, harmful algae and biodiversity—challenging paradigms in a world of complex nutrient changes. Mar Pollut Bull 124:591–606. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.04.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Li W, Mao F, Te SH, He Y, Gin K-H. 2021. Impacts of Microcystis on the dissemination of the antibiotic resistome in cyanobacterial blooms. ACS EST Water 1:1263–1273. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Havens KE, James RT, East TL, Smith VH. 2003. N: P ratios, light limitation, and cyanobacterial dominance in a subtropical lake impacted by non-point source nutrient pollution. Environ Pollut 122:379–390. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00304-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Stockner J, Callieri C, Cronberg G. 2000. Picoplankton and other non-bloom-forming cyanobacteria in lakes, p 195–231. In The ecology of cyanobacteria. Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 70. Stockner JG. 1988. Phototrophic picoplankton: an overview from marine and freshwater ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 33:765–775. doi: 10.4319/lo.1988.33.4part2.0765 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Berry DL, Goleski JA, Koch F, Wall CC, Peterson BJ, Anderson OR, Gobler CJ. 2015. Shifts in cyanobacterial strain dominance during the onset of harmful algal blooms in Florida Bay, USA. Microb Ecol 70:361–371. doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0564-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Suttle CA, Harrison PJ. 1986. Phosphate uptake rates of phytoplankton assemblages grown at different dilution rates in semicontinuous culture. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:1474–1481. doi: 10.1139/f86-184 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Richardson TL, Jackson GA. 2007. Small phytoplankton and carbon export from the surface ocean. Science 315:838–840. doi: 10.1126/science.1133471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Liu C, Shi X, Fan F, Wu F, Lei J. 2019. N: P ratio influences the competition of Microcystis with its picophytoplankton counterparts, Mychonastes and Synechococcus, under nutrient enrichment conditions. J Freshw Ecol 34:445–454. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2019.1622604 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Tan X, Gu H, Ruan Y, Zhong J, Parajuli K, Hu J. 2019. Effects of nitrogen on interspecific competition between two cell-size cyanobacteria: Microcystis aeruginosa and Synechococcus sp. Harmful Algae 89:101661. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Watzer B, Forchhammer K. 2018. Cyanophycin synthesis optimizes nitrogen utilization in the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01298-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01298-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Kuno S, Sako Y, Yoshida T. 2014. Diversification of CRISPR within coexisting genotypes in a natural population of the bloom-forming cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Microbiology (Reading) 160:903–916. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.073494-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Snir S, Koonin EV. 2011. Defense islands in bacterial and archaeal genomes and prediction of novel defense systems. J Bacteriol 193:6039–6056. doi: 10.1128/JB.05535-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Cai F, Axen SD, Kerfeld CA. 2013. Evidence for the widespread distribution of CRISPR-Cas system in the phylum Cyanobacteria. RNA Biol 10:687–693. doi: 10.4161/rna.24571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Guo L, Sattler L, Shafqat S, Graumann PL, Bramkamp M. 2021. A bacterial dynamin-like protein confers a novel phage resistance strategy on the population level in Bacillus subtilis. mBio 13:e0375321. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03753-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Chen Y, Zeng Z, She Q, Han W. 2023. The abortive infection functions of CRISPR-Cas and argonaute. Trends Microbiol 31:405–418. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Millman A, Melamed S, Leavitt A, Doron S, Bernheim A, Hör J, Garb J, Bechon N, Brandis A, Lopatina A, Ofir G, Hochhauser D, Stokar-Avihail A, Tal N, Sharir S, Voichek M, Erez Z, Ferrer JLM, Dar D, Kacen A, Amitai G, Sorek R. 2022. An expanded arsenal of immune systems that protect bacteria from phages. Cell Host Microbe 30:1556–1569. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Molineux IJ. 1991. Host-parasite interactions: recent developments in the genetics of abortive phage infections. New Biol 3:230–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Georjon H, Bernheim A. 2023. The highly diverse antiphage defence systems of bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:686–700. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00934-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Avrani S, Schwartz DA, Lindell D. 2012. Virus-host swinging party in the oceans: incorporating biological complexity into paradigms of antagonistic coexistence. Mob Genet Elements 2:88–95. doi: 10.4161/mge.20031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Winter C, Bouvier T, Weinbauer MG, Thingstad TF. 2010. Trade-offs between competition and defense specialists among unicellular planktonic organisms: the “killing the winner” hypothesis revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74:42–57. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00034-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Pound HL, Gann ER, Tang X, Krausfeldt LE, Huff M, Staton ME, Talmy D, Wilhelm SW. 2020. The “neglected viruses” of Taihu: abundant transcripts for viruses infecting eukaryotes and their potential role in phytoplankton succession. Front Microbiol 11:338. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R. 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:4516–4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Easson C, Lopez JV. 2017. Microbiome and bacterioplankton rRNA gene sequence data collected from Gulf of Mexico seawater samples, Cruises DP01 and DP02 from May 2015-August 2015. Distributed by: Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative Information and Data Cooperative (GRIIDC), Harte Research Institute, Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi. https://doi:10.7266/N7P55KWX
- 90. Storo R, Easson C, Shivji M, Lopez JV. 2021. Microbiome analyses demonstrate specific communities within five shark species. Front Microbiol 12:605285. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.605285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0252-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. R Team . 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. r foundation for statistical computing Version 4.1.1. Available from: https://www.R-project.org
- 93. Dixon P. 2003. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Vegetation Science 14:927–930. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Havens KE, Gawlik DE. 2005. Lake Okeechobee conceptual ecological model. Wetlands 25:908–925. doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2005)025[0908:LOCEM]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Harrell Jr FE. 2019. Package ‘hmisc’ Cran2018, 2019, 235-236
- 96. Wickham H, Wickham H. 2016. Programming with ggplot2. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for data analysis:241–253.
- 97. Bushnell B. 2018. BBTools: a suite of fast, multithreaded bioinformatics tools designed for analysis of DNA and RNA sequence data. Joint Genome Institute [Google Scholar]
- 98. Li D, Luo R, Liu C-M, Leung C-M, Ting H-F, Sadakane K, Yamashita H, Lam T-W. 2016. MEGAHIT v1.0: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods 102:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.02.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Ghuneim L-A, Raghuvanshi R, Neugebauer KA, Guzior DV, Christian MH, Schena B, Feiner JM, Castillo-Bahena A, Mielke J, McClelland M, Conrad D, Klapper I, Zhang T, Quinn RA. 2022. Complex and unexpected outcomes of antibiotic therapy against a polymicrobial infection. ISME J 16:2065–2075. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01252-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Brumfield KD, Leddy M, Usmani M, Cotruvo JA, Tien C-T, Dorsey S, Graubics K, Fanelli B, Zhou I, Registe N, Dadlani M, Wimalarante M, Jinasena D, Abayagunawardena R, Withanachchi C, Huq A, Jutla A, Colwell RR. 2022. Microbiome analysis for wastewater surveillance during COVID-19. mBio 13:e0059122. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00591-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Saha P, Bose D, Stebliankin V, Cickovski T, Seth RK, Porter DE, Brooks BW, Mathee K, Narasimhan G, Colwell R, Scott GI. 2022. Prior exposure to microcystin alters host gut resistome and is associated with dysregulated immune homeostasis in translatable mouse models. Sci Rep 12:11516. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15708-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. The UniProt Consortium . 2017. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D158–D169. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Franzosa EA, Hsu T, Sirota-Madi A, Shafquat A, Abu-Ali G, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C. 2015. Sequencing and beyond: integrating molecular 'omics' for microbial community profiling. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:360–372. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Paulson JN, Stine OC, Bravo HC, Pop M. 2013. Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat Methods 10:1200–1202. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, Dehal P, Ware D, Perez F, Canon S, et al. 2018. KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. 2016. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32:605–607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, Banfield JF. 2018. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol 3:836–843. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. 2017. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J 11:2864–2868. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Roux S, Enault F, Hurwitz BL, Sullivan MB. 2015. VirSorter: mining viral signal from microbial genomic data. PeerJ 3:e985. doi: 10.7717/peerj.985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J, Comeau DC, Connor R, Funk K, Kelly C, Kim S, Madej T, Marchler-Bauer A, Lanczycki C, Lathrop S, Lu Z, Thibaud-Nissen F, Murphy T, Phan L, Skripchenko Y, Tse T, Wang J, Williams R, Trawick BW, Pruitt KD, Sherry ST. 2022. Database resources of the National center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D20–D26. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Roux S, Camargo AP, Coutinho FH, Dabdoub SM, Dutilh BE, Nayfach S, Tritt A. 2023. iPHoP: an integrated machine learning framework to maximize host prediction for metagenome-derived viruses of archaea and bacteria. PLoS Biol 21:e3002083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Zablocki O, Jang HB, Bolduc B, Sullivan MB. 2019. vConTACT 2: a tool to automate genome-based prokaryotic viral taxonomy. Plant and Animal Genome XXVII Conference. [Google Scholar]
- 118. Camargo AP, Roux S, Schulz F, Babinski M, Xu Y, Hu B, Chain PSG, Nayfach S, Kyrpides NC. 2023. Identification of mobile genetic elements with geNomad. Nat Biotechnol. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01953-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Dongen S v., Abreu-Goodger C. 2012. Using MCL to extract clusters from networks, p 281–295. In Bacterial molecular networks. Springer. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Gustavsen JA, Pai S, Isserlin R, Demchak B, Pico AR. 2019. RCy3: network biology using cytoscape from within R. F1000Res 8:1774. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20887.3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Loftin KA, Clark JM, Journey CA, Kolpin DW, Van Metre PC, Carlisle D, Bradley PM. 2016. Spatial and temporal variation in microcystin occurrence in wadeable streams in the southeastern United States. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:2281–2287. doi: 10.1002/etc.3391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Loftin KA, Graham JL, Hilborn ED, Lehmann SC, Meyer MT, Dietze JE, Griffith CB. 2016. Cyanotoxins in inland lakes of the United States: occurrence and potential recreational health risks in the EPA national lakes assessment 2007. Harmful Algae 56:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2016.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Graham JL, Dubrovsky NM, Foster GM, King LR, Loftin KA, Rosen BH, Stelzer EA. 2020. Cyanotoxin occurrence in large rivers of the United States. Inland Waters 10:109–117. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2019.1700749 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Gene ontology bioprocesses in Lake Okeechobee.
Cyanobacteria metagenome assembled genome abundances and environmental metadata associated with metagenome samples.
Abundances of pathways within each cyanobacterial metagenome assembled genome from Lake Okeechobee.
Cyanophage genome abundances and information in Lake Okeechobee.
Figures S1-S5.
Information for 16S rRNA amplicon libraries from samples collected in Lake Okeechobee from March 2019 to February 2020.
ANOSIM comparing dissimilarities in microbial community composition across ecological zones in Lake Okeechobee.
Summary information for all metagenomes collected in Lake Okeechobee in 2019.
Cyanobacterial metagenome assembled genome (MAG) statistics and information.
Auxiliary metabolic genes present in picocyanobacterial cyanophage genomes recovered from metagenomes from Lake Okeechobee in 2019.
Data Availability Statement
All 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data, metagenomic data, and metagenome-assembled cyanobacterial and viral genomes are available under the BioProject PRJNA813570 (available at NCBI). Phytoplankton cell concentrations and cyanotoxin concentrations are available elsewhere (45). All environmental data used in this study are publicly available on DBHydro (http://my.sfwmd.gov/dbhydroplsql/show_dbkey_info.main_menu).







