Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Jul 23;19(7):e0307104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307104

Prevalence of insomnia and associated factors among postpartum mothers in Southern Ethiopia, a community-based cross-sectional study

Mesfin Difer Tetema 1,*, Kassahun Fikadu 2, Gistane Ayele 3, Gudeta Beriso Jima 1, Berhanu Negesse Kebede 2, Awol Arega Yimer 2, Legese Fekede Abza 4, Mebratu Demissie 1, Kenzudin Assfa Mossa 5, Seid Jemal Mohammed 1, Ayele Sahile Abdo 1, Mangistu Abera 1
Editor: Anteneh Mengist Dessie6
PMCID: PMC11265656  PMID: 39042615

Abstract

Insomnia has become a global public health concern, particularly among postpartum women. Minimal sleep interruption related to newborn care is normally expected, insomnia, however has negative impact during the postpartum period. Although its causes and contributing factors are poorly understood, it has a wide-ranging impact on the mother and her infant. So far, studies in Ethiopia have focused on the general community, neglecting mothers in the postpartum period. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of insomnia and the factors associated with it. A community-based cross-sectional study included 451 study participants who were chosen using a simple random sampling technique. A structured, pretested, and interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. After entering the data into EpiData version 3.1, it was exported to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26 for analysis. Bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were carried out. Variables with a P-value of 0.2 in the bivariable analysis were included in the multivariable analyses. Those with a P-value of 0.05 were declared statistically significant in the final model. The current study included 444 mothers in total. Insomnia was prevalent among 23.2% (95% CI: 19.3%, 27.4%) of mothers who had given birth within the previous 12 months. Insomnia was associated with unplanned index pregnancy [AOR = 4.4, 95% CI (2.2, 8.7)], alcohol consumption [AOR = 3.0, 95% CI (1.4, 6.5), low social support [AOR = 9.7, 95% CI (4.4, 21.1)], medium social support [AOR = 2.2, 95% CI (1.1, 4.3)] and depression [AOR = 10.7, 95% CI (5.7, 20.0). A planned index pregnancy, abstaining from alcohol, and recognizing and treating postpartum depression were all advised.

Introduction

Insomnia is a condition in which a person reports not getting enough good sleep or having difficulty initiating and/or maintaining the sleep required to feel rested and rejuvenated when they wake up [1]. In most cases, insomnia is classified as transient (lasting a few days), short-term (lasting up to three weeks), or long-term (lasting more than three weeks) [2]. It has no apparent etiology; it might be the sole symptom or, more commonly, co-occur with other medical and psychological disturbances or be linked to neurobiological, hormonal, socio-demographic, and other co-morbidities [1, 3, 4]. Long-term health consequences of insomnia include decreased quality of life as well as physical and psychological illness [5]. Estimating the extent of insomnia is influenced by the population being researched as well as the criteria utilized to define it [1]. Women have a 40% higher risk of insomnia than men [3, 6]. The risk is even higher during the postpartum period [6, 7]. Mother-infant bonding, quality of life, maternal health, and the physical, emotional, and cognitive health of the child are all negatively impacted by insomnia during the postpartum period [8, 9]. During the postpartum period, properly recognizing, understanding the associated variables, and executing the vast variety of therapeutic measures for insomnia is regarded as quite significant [1, 6, 10]. So far, studies have targeted the general population, and women during the postpartum period have been overlooked. On the other hand, there is a scarcity of community-level data on the prevalence and contributing factors of insomnia in Ethiopia, particularly in the research area. As a result, the purpose of this study is to fill in the knowledge gap by determining the prevalence of insomnia and its associated factors among mothers who gave birth in the study region within the previous 12 months.

Methods and materials

Study design, period, and setting

A community-based cross-sectional study was done in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia, from April 19 to May 19, 2021. Arba Minch Town is the administrative center of the Gamo zone in southern Ethiopia. The town is 500 kilometers south of Ethiopia’s capital, Addis Ababa, and 275 kilometers southwest of Hawassa, the capital of Ethiopia’s Southern Nation Nationalities and People Region (SNNPR). There are eleven kebeles in the town, with a total population of 135,452 people, 49.7% of whom are female [11]. According to a report from the town’s health department, 3765 moms gave birth in the town in the previous 12 months. There are also two hospitals, two health clinics, and around twenty private health services in the town.

Population and eligibility criteria

All mothers who gave birth within the previous 12 months during the study period were the source population. Those mothers who were selected randomly during the data collection period were the study population. All mothers who gave birth within the previous 12 months during the study period were included in the study. Those mothers who were in their first six postpartum days were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination

The minimum sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula: By considering the estimated proportion of insomnia (P) of 21.8% taken from the study conducted in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia [12], a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a 4% marginal error (d) with a 10% contingency for non-response rate, the sample size yielded 451.

Sampling procedure

A total of 451 study participants were drawn by a simple random sampling procedure using computer-generated random numbers. Health extension workers in the individual kebeles provided lists of homes with mothers who had given birth in the previous 12 months, which were utilized as a sample frame to design the research unit. Each kebeles received samples per their size. Using their house numbers and health extension workers as guides, randomly selected mothers were traced.

Data collection tool and measurements

An interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. The full-version (8-item) standardized Athens insomnia scale (AIS) was used to measure insomnia [13]. Those participants who scored 6 and above by using the AIS were considered to have insomnia [12]. Depression was measured using Edinburgh’s postnatal depression scale (EPDS) [14]. It is a 10-item self-reporting scale with scores of 0-3 based on a 1-week recall and specifically designed to screen for postpartum depression. Those mothers who scored ≥ 13 cut-off points using EPDS were considered to have depression [15]. Substance use (alcohol, khat, and cigarettes) was considered when mothers had used those substances at least once in the past 30 days [12]. Social support was measured using the Maternity Social Support Scale (MSSS) [16]. It was classified into three categories; high social support for those who scored 24–30, medium social support for those who scored 18–23, and low social support for those who scored below 18 using MSSS [17]. Four BSc nurses conducted data collection using face-to-face interviews.

Data quality control

A standardized tool was used to collect the data to ensure data quality. The tool was pre-tested in Wolayita Sodo town two weeks before the real data collection period, with 5% of the sample. A unique identifying number was assigned to each questionnaire. Data collectors and supervisors received adequate training on the research objectives, data collection methods and techniques, and interviews. All the data collection processes were closely supervised, and the collected data were actively checked by the lead investigator and supervisor to verify that the information obtained was complete and consistent, and urgent corrective steps were taken as needed. Finally, the data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 software after being checked for completeness and properly coded with a unique identification number. Two separate data clerks did double data entry to cross-check in consistency of data entry. Simple frequencies and cross-tabulation were done to look for missing values and outliers. This was then cross-checked by reviewing hard copies of the collected data.

Statistical analysis

The data were exported from EpiData to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Frequency, tables, figures, mean, and standard deviation (SD) were used to present the descriptive data. The association between the independent variables and the dependent variable was determined using a bivariable binary logistic regression analysis. Variables with a p-value of <0.2 in the bivariable binary logistic regression analysis were added to the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to control the confounders. Variance inflation factor (VIF) >10, and Tolerance <0.1 were considered suggestive of multicollinearity; however, no multicollinearity was detected during the analysis. The model’s fitness was assessed using the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. It was found to be insignificant (p-value = 0.729), indicating that the model had been fitted. Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with a 95% CI was estimated to show the strength of the association between the independent variables and the dependent variable after controlling for the effects of confounders. Independent variables with a P-value < 0.05 were declared to have a statistically significant association with the outcome variable.

Ethical considerations

Initially, the idea was examined and authorized by the Arba Minch University, college of medicine and health sciences. An official letter was obtained from the Institutional Research Ethics Review Board of the college with a reference number IRB/1069/21, as well as authorization was obtained from the Arba Minch local Health Administration. During data gathering, data collectors and supervisors wore face masks and followed the idea of physical distancing as well as other precautions not to impose a risk of Covid-19 on study participants. Each study participant signed an informed consent form. The data collectors gave each participant explicit information about the study, including its goal, the importance of their participation in the study, and for them, being aware of their involvement had no compensation, but told them the study’s results helped them indirectly. They were informed that the interview could take approximately ten minutes and that it could cause some minor discomfort. Aside from that, the mothers were not harmed by this study. After assuring them of their right to withdraw from participation at any point if they felt uncomfortable doing so without causing any consequence, they were asked to indicate their willingness to participate.

Patient and public involvement

No patient involved.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

A total of 444 respondents were participated in this study, making a response rate of 98.45%. The mean age (± SD) of the respondents was 30.55 (± 5.98). More than half of the respondents (55.6%) were Gamo, and a fifth (17.1%) were Wolayita by ethnicity. Moreover, two-fifths (43.9%) and 42.3 percent of the participants (42.3%) were protestant and orthodox Christians, respectively. Ninety-five percent (n = 422) of the study participants were married. About a quarter (24.3%) of the study participants had joined college. In terms of occupation, nearly a third of the respondents (n = 139) were housewives. The median monthly income of the respondents was 7000 Ethiopian Birr (ETB) with an inter-quartile range of 4517 ETB (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers who gave birth within the previous 12 months in Southern Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 444).

Characteristics Category Frequency Percent
Age of the respondents Below 25 years 79 17.8%
25-34 years 259 58.3%
35 and above 106 23.9%
Educational status of the mother Can’t read and write 56 12.6%
Can read and write 76 17.1%
Grade 1-8 77 17.3%
Grade 9-12 127 28.6%
College and above 108 24.3%
Religion Protestant 195 43.9%
Orthodox 188 42.3%
Muslim 45 10.1%
Others 16 3.6%
Ethnicity Gamo 247 55.6%
Gofa 49 11.0%
Wolayta 76 17.1%
Amhara 26 5.9%
Oromo 31 7.0%
Other 15 3.4%
Marital status Married 422 95.0%
Single/divorced/widowed 22 5%
Occupation of the mother Housewife 139 31.3%
Merchant 77 17.3%
Government employee 110 24.8%
Farmer 9 2.0%
Daily laborer 54 12.2%
Student 41 9.2%
Other 14 3.2%

Obstetric characteristics of the respondent

Of the study participants, 349 (78.6%) were multiparous, whereas 95 (21.4%) were primiparous. Eighty-nine percent of the respondents had at least one ANC follow-up during their index pregnancy. Around 426 (95.9%) of the respondents gave their last birth at a health facility (Table 2).

Table 2. Obstetric characteristics of mothers who gave birth within the previous 12 months in Southern Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 444).

Characteristics Category Frequency Percentage
Parity Primiparous 95 21.4%
Multiparous 349 78.6%
Status of index Planned 364 82%
pregnancy Unplanned 80 18%
ANC follow up during index Yes 395 89%
pregnancy No 49 11%
Number of ANC received during index pregnancy 1 27 6.8%
2 48 12.1%
3 126 31.9%
4 and above 194 49.1%
Place of delivery Institution 426 95.9%
Home 18 4.1%
Mode of delivery Vaginal delivery 368 82.9%
C/S 76 17.1%
Complications after birth Yes 36 8.1%
No 408 91.9%
PNC (≥1 visit) Yes 25 5.6%
No 419 94.4%
Types of infant feeding Exclusive breast milk 201 45.3%
Complementary 173 39%
Mixed feeding 62 14%
Other 8 1.8%
History of infant loss Yes 20 4.5%
No 424 95.5%

Clinical and behavioral characteristics of the respondent

Coffee consumption in the evening or at night was the most commonly (41.1%) used substance among the study participants. Of the total respondents, 84 (18.9%) of the mothers had depression. Among the participants, 26 (5.9%) had co-morbid illnesses. More than half (239) (53.8%) of the mothers had high social support, 135 (30.4%) of them had medium social support, and 70 (15.8%) of them had low social support (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Clinical and behavioral characteristics.

Fig 1

Prevalence of insomnia

Of the study participants, 23.2% (n = 103), (95% CI, 19.3%, 27.4%) of mothers who gave birth in the last 12 months in the study met criteria for insomnia.

Factors associated with insomnia

Based on the results of bivariable analysis at a p-value of < 0.2, the variables statistically associated with insomnia among mothers who gave birth within the last 12 months were the age of the respondents, status of index pregnancy, ANC follow-up during the index pregnancy, mode of delivery, alcohol consumption, coffee consumption, social support, and depression. Multivariable logistic regression was done by taking the variables that were statistically significant in bivariable logistic regression into account simultaneously. Then the back-ward conditional regression method was used. The variables that persisted to be significantly associated with insomnia at a p-value of < 0.05 in the final model were the Status of index pregnancy, alcohol consumption, social support, and depression. Insomnia was significantly associated with the status of their index pregnancy. The odds of insomnia was 4.4 times [AOR = 4.4 (2.2, 8.7)] higher among mothers who had an unplanned index pregnancy when compared to those who had a planned index pregnancy. In addition, this finding showed, insomnia to be significantly associated with alcohol consumption. The odds of insomnia among mothers who were consuming alcohol was 3.0 times [AOR = 3.0 (1.4, 6.5)] higher than those who were not consuming alcohol. This study also revealed maternal social support to be significantly associated with insomnia. The odds of insomnia was 2.2 times [AOR = 2.2 (1.1, 4.3)] higher among mothers with medium social support when compared to those with high social support. The odds of insomnia was 9.7 times [AOR = 9.7 (4.4, 21.2)] higher among mothers with low social support than those with high social support. Depression was also significantly associated with insomnia in this study. The odds of insomnia was 10.7 times [AOR = 10.7 (5.7, 20.0)] higher among mothers who had depression when compared to mothers who had no depression (Table 3).

Table 3. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis depicting factors associated with insomnia among mothers who gave birth within the previous 12 months in Southern Ethiopia 2021(n = 444).

Characteristic Category Insomnia COR(95% CI) AOR (95% CI) p-value
Yes No
Age of the respondents Below 25 years 25 54 1.6(0.8, 3.1)* 1.3(0.5, 3.3) .573
25-34 years 54 205 0.9(0.5, 1.6) 0.8(0.4, 31.6) 0.468
35 and above 24 82 1 1
Status of index pregnancy Unplanned 45 35 6.8(4.0, 11.5)* 4.4 (2.2, 8.7)** .001
Planned 58 306 1 1
ANC follow up No 20 29 2.6(1.4, 4.8)* 1.9(0.8, 4.98) .167
Yes 83 312 1 1
Mode of delivery C/S 26 50 1.96(1.1, 3.4)* 2.0(0.9, 4.4) .082
Vaginal 77 291 1 1
Alcohol use Yes 23 32 2.8(1.5, 5)* 3.0 (1.4, 6.5)** .005
No 80 309 1 1
Coffee use Yes 54 129 1.8(1.2, 2.8)* 1.3(0.7, 2.4) .444
No 49 212 1 1
Social support Low 49 21 19.97(10.3,38.6)* 9.7(4.5, 21.2)** .001
Medium 29 106 2.3 (1.3, 4.2)* 2.2(1.1, 4.3)** .026
High 25 214 1 1
Depression Yes 55 29 12.3(7.2, 21.2)* 10.7 (5.7, 20.0)** .001
No 48 312 1 1

*Significant at p <0.2

**significant at p < 0.05, 1= reference

Discussion

The overall prevalence of insomnia among mothers who gave birth within the previous 12 months in the study area was 23.2%. This finding is lower than studies conducted in Korea (50.5%) [18], Nepal (50.2% [19], Taiwan (61.6%) [20], and Iran (35.4%) [21]. This difference might be due to the magnitude of alcohol consumption in Ethiopia being low when compared to those countries [22]. However, the finding of this study was higher than studies conducted in Israel (10%) [9] and Canada (16%) [23]. This difference might be due to socio-demographic variations. The finding of this study is in-line with a study conducted in Bahir Dar Ethiopia (21.8%) [12], these consistent findings might show that insomnia is a troublesome issue among postnatal mothers throughout the country. In this study, insomnia was statistically associated with the status of the index pregnancy. The odds of insomnia among mothers who had an unplanned index pregnancy was 4.4 times higher when compared to those who had a planned index pregnancy. However, this finding is not supported by the study conducted in Bahir Dar Ethiopia [12]. This might be due to this study being community-based where many women with unplanned pregnancies fail to visit health facilities when compared to the study in Bahir Dar Ethiopia that was institution-based [12] . Alcohol consumption was also significantly associated with insomnia in this study; the odds of insomnia were 3 times higher among mothers who were consuming alcohol than those who were not consuming alcohol. This finding is also supported by studies done at Bahir Dar, Ethiopia [12]. This is due to alcohol, which is one of the most addictive psychoactive substances that can lead to physical and psychological dependence damaging emotional effects resulting in disturbed sleep patterns [24]. In this study, maternal social support was similarly linked to insomnia; the odds of insomnia was 2.2 times higher among mothers with medium social support when compared to those with high social support. In addition to this, the odds of insomnia were 9.7 times higher among mothers with low social support than those with high social support. These findings were also supported by a study conducted in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia [12]. This might be due to good social support may influence sleep patterns by instilling a sense of belonging and connectedness, inducing a positive mood state, and promoting positive health behaviors such as healthy sleep habits [25]. Based on the findings of this study, the odds of insomnia were 10.7 times higher among mothers who had depression when compared to those who had no depression. The finding was also supported by studies conducted in Taiwan [26], Norway [27] Turkey [28], Nepal [29], and Ethiopia [12]. This finding may be explained by the well established and bi-directional relationship between insomnia and depression [30].

Conclusion

Insomnia during the postpartum period is a serious issue having negative consequence on the normal functioning of the mother and the health of the newborn. This study assessed the prevalence of insomnia and its associated factors among mothers who had given birth within the previous 12 months in the study area. A quarter of women experienced insomnia during the postpartum period in Southern Ethiopia. Unplanned index pregnancy, alcohol consumption, low to medium social support and depression were factors significantly associated with insomnia. Given the findings of the study, all concerned bodies were advised to learn about and act on the identified factors to promote maternal mental health as well as child’s health and development. Therefore, the following recommendations were made for the stakeholders.

We wish to recommend that mothers have a planned pregnancy though utilization of family planning methods. We also wish to recommend mothers avoid alcohol consumption. These can help them by decreasing physical and psychological dependence as a result this helps them to adequately cope with the emotional changes during the postpartum period and promotes a healthy sleep pattern. As the Health extension workers (HEWs) and other health professionals are the primary caregivers, we wish to recommend them to create awareness for mothers on the adverse impacts of alcohol consumption. These can improve the mother’s knowledge and attitude towards alcohol consumption during the postpartum period as a result mothers might acquire enough and good quality sleep. We wish also to recommend that HEWs and other health professionals devote their time to promoting family planning utilization as a means to avoid unplanned pregnancies. We also recommend that health professionals screen and effectively manage postpartum depression. Therefore, health intervention planners and providers should take these behavioral, social, and health-care-related factors into account while developing a post-partum insomnia prevention intervention.

Strength and limitations of the study

Many of the maternal health problems are anchored in the community, hence the study focused on mothers throughout the postpartum period at the community level. The study’s external validity was increased by including all kebeles in the study area. The study also relied on primary data. As a result, the data has a high level of trustworthiness. Because the instrument’s reliability, validity, and sensitivity are high, the study enables the comparison of results. However, there are certain limitations to this research. In this study, moms were asked to estimate their sleep difficulty if it had occurred at least three times per week. As a result, recall bias could be present in this study. It is also defficult to estabilish the cause-effect relationship between some of the explanatory variables and the outcome variable. Comparison and discussion are challenging due to limited previous studies conducted in Ethiopia.

Supporting information

S1 File

(SAV)

pone.0307104.s001.sav (44.1KB, sav)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Arba Minch University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences for the ethical approval. We would also like to express our gratitude to the study participants, data collectors, supervisors, and the Arba Minch town health department.

Abbreviations

AIS

Athens Insomnia Scale

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

COR

Crude Odds Ratio

CI

Confidence interval

MSSS

Maternity Social Support Scale

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Roth T. Insomnia: definition, prevalence, etiology, and consequences. Journal of clinical sleep medicine. 2007;3(5 suppl):S7–S10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Krystal AD. The effect of insomnia definitions, terminology, and classifications on clinical practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005;53(S7):S258–S63. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53391.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singh P. Insomnia: A sleep disorder: Its causes, symptoms and treatments. International Journal of Medical and Health Research. 2016;2(10):37–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sacher J, Wilson AA, Houle S, Rusjan P, Hassan S, Bloomfield PM, et al. Elevated brain monoamine oxidase A binding in the early postpartum period. Archives of general psychiatry. 2010;67(5):468–74. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morin CM, Drake CL, Harvey AG, Krystal AD, Manber R, Riemann D, et al. Insomnia disorder. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2015;1(1):1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Romero R, Badr MS. A role for sleep disorders in pregnancy complications: challenges and opportunities. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;210(1):3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sivertsen B, Hysing M, Dørheim SK, Eberhard-Gran M. Trajectories of maternal sleep problems before and after childbirth: a longitudinal population-based study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.E Montgomery-Downs H, Stremler R, P Insana S. Postpartum sleep in new mothers and fathers. The Open Sleep Journal. 2013;6(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tikotzky L. Postpartum maternal sleep, maternal depressive symptoms and self-perceived mother-infant emotional relationship. Behavioral Sleep Medicine. 2016;14(1):5–22. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2014.940111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cunnington D, Junge MF, Fernando AT. Insomnia: prevalence, consequences and effective treatment. Medical Journal of Australia. 2013;199:S36–S40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ababa A. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia central statistical agency population projection of Ethiopia for all regions at Wereda level from 2014–2017. Addis Ababa: Central Statistical Agency. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Belete H, Misgan E. Determinants of insomnia among mothers during postpartum period in northwest Ethiopia. Sleep disorders. 2019;2019. doi: 10.1155/2019/3157637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Soldatos CR, Dikeos DG, Paparrigopoulos TJ. Athens Insomnia Scale: validation of an instrument based on ICD-10 criteria. Journal of psychosomatic research. 2000;48(6):555–60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00095-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Smith-Nielsen J, Matthey S, Lange T, Væver MS. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against both DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression. BMC psychiatry. 2018;18(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wubetu AD, Engidaw NA, Gizachew KD. Prevalence of postpartum depression and associated factors among postnatal care attendees in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia, 2018. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02873-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Webster J, Linnane JW, Dibley LM, Hinson JK, Starrenburg SE, Roberts JA. Measuring social support in pregnancy: can it be simple and meaningful? Birth. 2000;27(2):97–101. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00097.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shitu S, Geda B, Dheresa M. Postpartum depression and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in the last twelve months in Ankesha district, Awi zone, North West Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ko H, Shin J, Kim MY, Kim YH, Lee J, Kil KC, et al. Sleep disturbances in Korean pregnant and postpartum women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;33(2):85–90. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2012.658465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kiviruusu O, Pietikäinen JT, Kylliäinen A, Pölkki P, Saarenpää-Heikkilä O, Marttunen M, et al. Trajectories of mothers’ and fathers’ depressive symptoms from pregnancy to 24 months postpartum. Journal of affective disorders. 2020;260:629–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wen S-Y, Ko Y-L, Jou H-J, Chien L-Y. Sleep quality at 3 months postpartum considering maternal age: A comparative study. Women and Birth. 2018;31(6):e367–e73. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Doering JJ, Szabo A, Goyal D, Babler E. Sleep quality and quantity in low-income postpartum women. MCN The American journal of maternal child nursing. 2017;42(3):166. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ayano G, Yohannis K, Abraha M, Duko B. The epidemiology of alcohol consumption in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy. 2019;14(1):1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Creti L, Libman E, Rizzo D, Fichten CS, Bailes S, Tran D-L, et al. Sleep in the postpartum: Characteristics of first-time, healthy mothers. Sleep disorders. 2017;2017. doi: 10.1155/2017/8520358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stein MD, Friedmann PD. Disturbed sleep and its relationship to alcohol use. Substance abuse. 2006;26(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Troxel WM, Robles TF, Hall M, Buysse DJ. Marital quality and the marital bed: Examining the covariation between relationship quality and sleep. Sleep medicine reviews. 2007;11(5):389–404. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hsieh Y-P, Lu W-H, Yen C-F. Psychosocial determinants of insomnia in adolescents: roles of mental health, behavioral health, and social environment. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2019;13:848. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dørheim SK, Bondevik GT, Eberhard-Gran M, Bjorvatn B. Sleep and depression in postpartum women: a population-based study. Sleep. 2009;32(7):847–55. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.7.847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kızılırmak A, Timur S, Kartal B. Insomnia in pregnancy and factors related to insomnia. The Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012. doi: 10.1100/2012/197093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Khadka R, Hong SA, Chang Y-S. Prevalence and determinants of poor sleep quality and depression among postpartum women: a community-based study in Ramechhap district, Nepal. International health. 2020;12(2):125–31. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Benca RM, Peterson MJ. Insomnia and depression. Sleep medicine. 2008;9:S3–S9. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9457(08)70010-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Anteneh Mengist Dessie

26 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-29005Prevalence Of Insomnia And Associated Factors Among Postpartum Mothers in Southern Ethiopia, a community-based cross-sectional study.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tetema,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 10 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Anteneh Mengist Dessie, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. In the online submission form, you indicated that [The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the corresponding author]. 

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval. 

3. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript. 

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: - In the abstract, consider one sentence distinguishing insomnia in postpartum from sleep disruption in postpartum due to direct childcare.

- I am not sure about the final sentence of the abstract. It feels strange to me to strongly advise a planned index pregnancy. On what grounds is this recommendation made? Consider amending this language. Correlation does not equate causation.

- P.7 the formatting and capitalization of academic affiliations is not consistent (ex. 1 Department of Midwifery, 2Department of midwifery).

- Introduction- I would consider a different definition of insomnia. The important distinction between postpartum insomnia and postpartum sleep disruption is- is the person having difficulty sleeping, outside of direct childcare. Basically, when given the opportunity, still struggling with their sleep.

- Consider removing this sentence or clarifying what is meant by ‘atypical’- Women have a 40% higher risk and an atypical presentation of insomnia than men (3, 6).

- I like the description of Arba Minch Town.

- P. 14 might be nice to include monthly income converted to USD or another currency so more readers can comprehend.

- P. 18- consider ‘met criteria for insomnia’ rather than ‘had insomnia’

- P. 21- I like the discussion opening, situating the findings in the context of literature from other countries

- P. 22 “This might be due to the definite link between depression and insomnia, as well as insomnia, being a manifestation of depression(30).” Consider amending the language to acknowledge the bi directional relationship for example “This finding may be explained by the well established and bi directional relationship between insomnia and depression.”

- For the conclusion- consider mentioning established implications of insomnia in postpartum.

- Please consider amending this sentence, it is hard to understand “As a result, the sustainable development goals for mental health can be achieved; even if it appears that world leaders are now off-track in achieving mental health targets, and hence, the following recommendations were made for actions to be performed by the stakeholders”.

Reviewer #2: Thank-you for this submission. I was curious about your definition of chronic insomnia - you mention difficulty sleeping that lasts for greater than 3 weeks. The definition I am more familiar with indicates chronicity begins after 3 months - was this a different definition specifically for post-partum patients?

I was impressed with your response rate and that you did a trial run for two weeks to ensure that the data collection was high quality.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 23;19(7):e0307104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307104.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Apr 2024

Reviewer 1

Dear reviewer, thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions. It was very helpful. We have tried to address all the comments and suggestions on the main manuscript. Here, we have to clarify some important issues.

Thank you again for your time.

Comment

� In the abstract, consider one sentence distinguishing insomnia in postpartum from sleep disruption in postpartum due to direct childcare.

Response: Thank you for the comment. We have amended it in the manuscript.

� I am not sure about the final sentence of the abstract. It feels strange to me to strongly advise a planned index pregnancy. On what grounds is this recommendation made? Consider amending this language. Correlation does not equate causation.

Response: Thank you for the comment. We have amended it in the manuscript.

� P.7 the formatting and capitalization of academic affiliations is not consistent (ex. 1 Department of Midwifery, 2Department of midwifery).

Response: Thank you for the comment. We have amended it in the manuscript.

- Introduction- I would consider a different definition of insomnia. The important distinction between postpartum insomnia and postpartum sleep disruption is- is the person having difficulty sleeping, outside of direct childcare. Basically, when given the opportunity, still struggling with their sleep..

Response: Thank you for the comment. The definition of insomnia is the same during the postpartum period when mothers are obliged for childcare with those having no such obligation. The tool (Athens Insomnia Scale) that we have used to measure insomnia during the postpartum period is also used for the general population. The issue is that women have added burden of insomnia due to many reasons including childcare during postpartum period.

- Consider removing this sentence or clarifying what is meant by ‘atypical’- Women have a 40% higher risk and an atypical presentation of insomnia than men (3, 6).

Response: Thank you for the comment. We have amended it in the manuscript.

- P. 14 might be nice to include monthly income converted to USD or another currency so more readers can comprehend.

Response: We appreciate your comment, the value of the local currency (Ethiopian birr (ETB)) when changed to USD or other currencies varies within a short period of time. As a result the value of ETB during the time of data collection would be difficult to gather.

- P. 18- consider ‘met criteria for insomnia’ rather than ‘had insomnia’

Response: Thank you for the comment. We have amended it in the manuscript.

- P. 22 “This might be due to the definite link between depression and insomnia, as well as insomnia, being a manifestation of depression (30).” Consider amending the language to acknowledge the bi directional relationship for example “This finding may be explained by the well-established and bi directional relationship between insomnia and depression.

Response: Thank you for the comment. We have amended it in the manuscript.

- For the conclusion- consider mentioning established implications of insomnia in postpartum

Response: Thank you for the comment. We have amended it in the manuscript.

- Please consider amending this sentence, it is hard to understand “As a result, the sustainable development goals for mental health can be achieved; even if it appears that world leaders are now off-track in achieving mental health targets, and hence, the following recommendations were made for actions to be performed by the stakeholders”

Response: Thank you for the comment. We have amended it in the manuscript

Reviewer 2

Dear reviewer, thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions. It was very helpful. We really appreciate it. Here, we have to clarify the issue.

Comment: I was curious about your definition of chronic insomnia - you mention difficulty sleeping that lasts for greater than 3 weeks. The definition I am more familiar with indicates chronicity begins after 3 months - was this a different definition specifically for post-partum patients?

Response: Thank you for the comment. What we have written is not the definition of chronic insomnia. It is the definition of long-term insomnia. We have classified insomnia into transient, short-term and long-term (not acute and chronic). To our knowledge too chronic insomnia is insomnia lasting more than 3 months.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0307104.s002.docx (18KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Anteneh Mengist Dessie

1 Jul 2024

Prevalence Of Insomnia And Associated Factors Among Postpartum Mothers in Southern Ethiopia, a community-based cross-sectional study.

PONE-D-23-29005R1

Dear Dr. Tetema,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Anteneh Mengist Dessie, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Thank-you for your responses and for addressing the concerns that were raised. We appreciate your recommendation that health care workers ask their patients about their sleep.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Anteneh Mengist Dessie

12 Jul 2024

PONE-D-23-29005R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tetema,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Mr. Anteneh Mengist Dessie

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (SAV)

    pone.0307104.s001.sav (44.1KB, sav)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0307104.s002.docx (18KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES