Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Georgian Med News. 2020 Jun;(303):120–125.

Traumatic Brain Injuries in Children on the Example of Pediatric Hospital in Georgia

N Chikhladze 1,*, M Kereselidze 2, E Burkadze 3, K Akhobadze 4, N Chkhaberidze 5
PMCID: PMC11267057  NIHMSID: NIHMS2005752  PMID: 32841193

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and permanent disability in children and adolescents. Study of TBI with reliable and high-quality data represents the basis for effective strategies for injury prevention.

METHODS:

Georgian National Center for Disease Control database for 2018 was used to identify TBI cases treated at the largest pediatric hospital in Georgia. Cases were included based on the S06 diagnosis coded of ICD-10. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the patients and their traumatic brain injuries.

RESULTS:

The Iashvili Childrens’hospital treated 296 pediatric brain injuries in 2018. TBIs were more common in boys (61.1%) than in girls (38.9%), and patients aged 10 −14 were most frequent.4,4% of male patients and 1,7% of female patients required more than 15 days of in-patient treatment. More than two thirds of children had suffered TBI due to falling (66.6%), followed by road traffic injuries (18.9%) and other type of blunt force (14.2%).54.3% of all TBI patients required at least one day of hospital stay. Most of the TBI patients (74,3%) were brought to the hospital by private transportation. In-patient treatment was completed in 98.9% of cases, three male patients (1%) died. In all three cases of lethal outcome, the cause of injury was road traffic.

CONCLUSION:

Based on existing data, it was possible to study just part of TBI epidemiological properties.TBI national reporting formats do not cover information about location and time of injuries, place of occurrence, therapeutical treatment and severity of the illness.

To study the full epidemiological picture of TBI, retrospective studies based on the medical history in hospitals are needed.

Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, pediatric injuries, epidemiological characteristics, national reporting system

Introduction.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide and one of the major problems of Public Health. Mortality from child traumatic injuries is 3–4 times higher in middle-income countries than in high-income countries. Unfortunately, TBI is under-recognized and under-studied, particularly in many low- and middle- income countries [911]. Study of TBI reliable and high-quality data represents the basis for elaborating effective strategies for injury prevention [12].

Since 2014 the traumatic brain injury national reporting format for the hospitalized patients is in line with the International E-health standards (ICD-10 codes for each case, including special codes for external causes of the injury, NCSP codes for health intervention etc.). Since 2019 the country started introducing (piloting) Electronic Health Record (EHR) system, which potentially can collect all TBI related necessary information.

In 2018, the total number of hospitalized 0–17 age patients with TBI diagnosis (ICD-10 - S06) was 2314 in all medical facilities of Georgia. Patients were hospitalized in different hospitals in Tbilisi and regions, and the biggest number (12,8%) was hospitalized in Pediatric hospital. In 33 medical facilities was hospitalized up to 5 patients and in 23 medical facilities 5–10 TBI patients during the year. The aim of the research is to study epidemiological features of pediatric TBI based on the example of data from the biggest pediatric hospital in Georgia.

Materials and Methods.

In this study we used descriptive statistics of NCDC official data.

Results.

The total number of pediatric TBI patients during one year (2018) was 296, among them majority were male patients (61,1%), minority of patients were in 15–17 age group (12,5%) while in other three age group (10–14; 5–9 and 0–4) patients were distributed approximately equally (31,8%, 28,7% and 27,0%).

Falls were the main cause of pediatric TBI (66,6%) cases, followed by RTI (18,9%) and exposure to inanimate and animate mechanical forces (14,2%). The type of addressing for majority of patents is (74,3%) walk-in, ambulance (16,9%) and referral (8,8%). Treatment was completed for 293 (98,9) patients, 3 (1%) patients died.

The total number of hospital days was 1073. In-patient treatment for less than one week was sufficient for 90,8% of treatment, same time, for the majority of patients (54,9%) the number of hospital stay days was one day, for 36,5% 2–6 days, for 6,4% 7–14 days and for 2,7% of patients more than 15 days. 2–6 days of in-patient treatment was needed for more girls rather than boys, while boys prevailed in all the other cases. The longest, more than 15 days of in-patient treatment was needed for 3,9% of TBI affected boys and for 0,9% of girls.

The highest number of one-day hospital stay was found among 5–9 years old patients (63,5%). One-day hospital stay was also required for more than half of cases in 10–14 year and 5–9 year old patient groups (54,3% and 51,4% respectively). Almost equal number of 0–4 year old patients required on-day (46.3%), and up to one week (47,5%) hospital stay.

The 7–14-day in-patient care was required for a biggest number of patients (9,6%) aged 10–14, equally in 5–9 and 0–4 age groups (5,9% and 5,0% respectively). More than 15-days of hospital stay was most required in 15–17 yearage group (8.1%), equally in 5–9 and 10–14 age groups (2,4% and 2,1% respectively).

56,3% of fall cases and 41,1%of RTI cases required one day hospital stay. 2–6 days hospital stay was required almost equally in fall and RTI groups (38,6% and 35,7% respectively). More than 15 days of hospital stay was required for 7,1% of RTI cases and for 2% of fall cases. Cases of exposure to inanimate and animate mechanical forces required one day hospital stay in 64,3% of cases. All these types of injuries prevailed in boys.

More than 15 days of in-patient care was required for 10 patients only, including 8 patients who were treated for up to 40 days, and two patients treated for 144 days (cause: RTI; Diagnosis: Traumatic cerebral oedema (S06.1)) and 146 days (cause: falling; Diagnosis: Other Intracranial Injuries (S06.8)). In both cases the patient was a male.

Most of the RTI cases were equally foundin 5–9 and 10–14 age groups(33,9%); Most of the cases of fall were found in 0–4 age group (31.5%), followed by 10–14 (39,5%) and 5–9 (28.9%) age groups.

One day hospital stay was required for the majority of walk-in patients (57.7%) and for the half of the patients (50%) transported by ambulance. For the referral cases, one day hospital stay and 2–6 days hospital stay was required almost equally (34,6% and 38.5% respectively). More than 15 days of hospital stay was required for referral cases (7,7%) and walk-in patients (2,7%).

84% of cases were diagnosed of Concussion S06.0, followed by Focal brain injury S06.3 (6.1%), Epidural haemorrhage S06.4 (3,7%) and Traumatic subdural haemorrhage S06.5 (3,0%). 63.5% of Concussion cases required one day hospital stay and 36,1% required up to one week hospital stay.

Focal brain injury and Epidural haemorrhage cases equally required up to one week and up to two weeks hospital stay (38,9% and 36,4% respectively). Out of 4 patients with diagnosis of Intracranial injury, unspecified S06.9, 2 patients died and one required hospital care for 144 days.

In-patient treatment was completed in 98,9% of cases and three patients died. All three patients with lethal outcome were males from different age groups (0–4, 10–14 and 15–17). The duration of hospital stay was different - 1 day, 7 days and 19 days. The cause of lethal injury was RTI, the diagnosis were S06.9 Intracranial injury, unspecified, in two cases and S06.2 diffuse brain injury, in one case.

Our research revealed that, based on the data analysis any type of TBIs are generally more common in boys than in girls. More than 15 days of in-patient treatment was also required in boys. TBI cases are highest in children aged 10–14. The TBI’s leading cause was falling. Falling was the main cause of injury in children aged 0 to 4 years and RTI in children aged 5 to 14 years. 56.3% of those patients required one day hospital stay. Most of the TBI patients (74,3%) had walked-in in the hospital. In-patient treatment was completed in 98.9% of cases, three male patients (1%) died. In all three cases of lethal outcome, the cause of injury was RTI.

Thus, the statistical data analysis of Georgia’s largest children’s hospital has made clear how TBI cases are distributed according to sex and age groups, mechanism of injury and type of addressing, as well as diagnosis and hospitalization days, including the reasons for lethal outcomes. However, based on existing data, it waspossible to study just part of TBI epidemiological properties.

Conclusion.

Traumatic brain injury national reporting formats do not cover information about location and time of injuries, place of occurrence, therapeutical treatment and severity of the illness. In official statistics there is no case-based information about patients, which got the care in the emergency department. Accordingly, current official data reflects incomplete picture on the TBI in the country, including pediatric TBIs. It is necessary to conduct TBI retrospective study to evaluate TBI’s complete epidemiological properties.

Table No1.

Distribution of cases according Age, gender, mechanism of injury

Variables Number of cases (296)
Number %
Gender
Male 181 61.1
Female 115 38.9
Age
0–4 80 27.0
5–9 85 28.7
10–14 94 31.8
15–17 37 12.5
Mechanism of injury
RTI 56 18.9
Fall 197 66.6
Assault 0 0.0
Exposure to inanimate and animate mechanical forces 42 14.2
Other 1 0.3
Type of addressing
Walk-in 220 74.3
Ambulance 50 16.9
Refferal 26 8.8
Discharge status
Treatment completed 293 98.9
Died 3 1.00

Table No2.

Distribution of cases according to the number of hospital days

Variables Total Distribution of cases according to the number of hospital days (296 cases - 1073 hospital days)
1 day 2–6 days 7–14 days > 15 days and more
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Gender
Male 181 100 55.2 61 33.7 12 6.6 8 4.4
Female 115 61 53.0 47 40.9 5 4.3 2 1.7
Age
0–4 80 37 46.3 38 47.5 3 3.8 2 2.5
5–9 85 54 63.5 24 28.2 5 5.9 2 2.4
10–14 94 51 54.3 32 34.0 8 8.5 3 3.2
15–17 37 19 51.4 14 37.8 1 2.7 3 8.1
Mechanism of injury
RTI - V01-V99 56 23 41.1 20 35.7 8 14.3 5 8.9
Fall - W00-W19 197 111 56.3 76 38.6 5 2.5 5 2.5
Assault - X85-Y09 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Exposure to inanimate and animate mechanical forces - W20-W64 42 27 64.3 12 28.6 3 7.1 0 0.0
Other 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0
Type of addressing
Walk-in 220 127 57.7 78 35.5 8 3.6 7 3.2
Ambulance 50 25 50.0 20 40.0 5 10.0 0 0.0
Refferal 26 9 34.6 10 38.5 4 15.4 3 11.5

Table No3.

Mechanism of injury by age and sex

Mechanism of injury by age and sex
RTI - V01-V99 Total % in total number of RTI Male Female
0–4 10 17.9 4 6
5–9 19 33.9 13 6
10–14 19 33.9 10 9
15–17 8 14.3 5 3
All ages 56 100.0 32 24
Fall - W00-W19 Total % in total number of Falls Male Female
0–4 62 31.5 28 34
5–9 57 28.9 46 11
10–14 60 30.5 36 24
15–17 18 9.1 13 5
All ages 197 100.0 123 74
Exposure to inanimate and animate mechanical forces - W20-W64 Total % in total number of Exposure to inanimate and animate mechanical forces Male Female

Table No4.

Distribution of cases according to the number of hospital days

Variables Total Distribution of cases according to the number of hospital days (296 cases - 1073 hospital days)
1 day 2–6 days 7–14 days > 15 days and more
Number % Number % Number % Number %
ICD Diagnosis
S06.0 Concussion 249 158 63.5 90 36.1 1 0.4 0 0.0
S06.1 Traumatic cerebral oedema 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 1 100.0
S06.2 Diffuse brain injury 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0
S06.3 Focal brain injury 18 2 11.1 7 38.9 7 38.9 2 11.1
S06.4 Epidural haemorrhage 11 0 0.0 4 36.4 4 36.4 3 27.3
S06.5 Traumatic subdural haemorrhage 9 0 0.0 5 55.6 3 33.3 1 11.1
S06.6 Traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage 2 0 0.0 1 50.0 1 50.0 0 0.0
S06.8 Other intracranial injuries 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0
S06.9 Intracranial injury, unspecified 4 1 25.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 2 50.0

Table No5.

Distribution of fatal cases according to the age, gender, ICD Diagnosis

Fatal cases (3)
Gender
Male 3
Female 0
Age
0–4 1
5–9 0
10–14 1
15–17 1
ICD Diagnosis
S06.2 Diffuse brain injury 1
S06.9 Intracranial injury, unspecified 2
Mechanism of injury
RTI - V01-V99 3
Type of addressing
Walk-in 2
Ambulance 1
Length of stay (days)
1 1
7–14 1 (7 days)
15 and more 1 (19 days)

Acknowledgement

The work reported in this publication was funded by the NIH-Fogarty International Trauma Training Program ‘iCREATE: Increasing Capacity for Research in Eastern Europe’ and INITIatE: International Collaboration to Increase Traumatic Brain Injury in Europe, both at the University of Iowa and the Cluj School of Public Health (National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center 2D43TW007261 and 5R21NS098850).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wells Adam J, Hutchinson Peter JA. The management of traumatic brain injury Surgery (Oxford).Volume 36, Issue 11 2018, pp. 613–620. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Takashi ARAKI, Hiroyuki YOKOTA and Akio MORITA:. Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Characteristic Features, Diagnosis, and Management. 2017, 57(2): 82–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eenan HT, Runyan DK, Nocera M. Longitudinal follow-up of families and young children with traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics 2006; 117:1291–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ryan NP, van Bijnen L, Catroppa C, et al. Longitudinal outcome and recovery of social problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI): Contribution of brain insult and family environment. Int J Dev Neurosci, 2016; 49:23–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Keenan HT, Bratton SL. Epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurosci 2006; 28:256–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Teng Sung Shin, Chong Shu-Ling. Pediatric traumatic brain injury - a review of management strategies. 2018, 2:25. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bartlett S. The problem of children’s injuries in low-income countries: a review Health Policy Plan, 17 (2002), pp. 1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hyder Corinne Peek-Asa Adnan A.. Injury Prevention and Control: The Public Health Approach.The Oxford Textbook of Public Health, 2011, pp.1–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dewan MC, Mummareddy N, Wellons JC, et al. Epidemiology of Global Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Qualitative Review. World Neurosurg, 2016; 91:497–509.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schneier AJ, Shields BJ, Hostetler SG, et al. Incidence of pediatric traumatic brain injury and associated hospital resource utilization in the United States. Pediatrics 2006; 118:483–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Majdan M, Plancikova D, Brazinova A, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Public Health 2016; 1: e76–e83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ministry of labour, health and social affairs of Georgia national centre for disease control and public health. Health Care Statistical Yearbook 2017. Georgia, 2018. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES