Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2003 Aug 9;327(7410):329. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7410.329

Tennis elbow

Willem Assendelft 1, Sally Green 2, Rachelle Buchbinder 2, Peter Struijs 3, Nynke Smidt 4
PMCID: PMC1126728  PMID: 12907489

Definition Tennis elbow has many analogous terms, including lateral elbow pain, lateral epicondylitis, rowing elbow, tendonitis of the common extensor origin, and peritendonitis of the elbow. Tennis elbow is characterised by pain and tenderness over the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and pain on resisted dorsiflexion of the wrist, middle finger, or both. For the purposes of this review, tennis elbow was restricted to lateral elbow pain or lateral epicondylitis.

What are the effects of treatments for tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis)?

Beneficial

Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for short term pain relief

One systematic review has found that topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus placebo significantly improve pain in the short term. Minor adverse effects have been reported. We found no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral versus topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Likely to be beneficial

Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

One systematic review found limited evidence of a short term improvement in pain and function with an oral non-steroidal inflammatory drug versus placebo. The review found some evidence that fewer people receiving an oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug rather than a corticosteroid injection had self perceived improvement at four weeks, but an oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug significantly reduced pain at 26 weeks.

Trade off between benefits and harms

Corticosteroid injections

We found one systematic review and two subsequent RCTs of corticosteroid injections, which found limited evidence of a short term improvement in symptoms with steroid injections versus placebo, a local anaesthetic, elbow strapping, or physiotherapy. It found no good evidence on long term effects of corticosteroids versus placebo or local anaesthetic. It found no evidence of a difference with corticosteroid injection versus mobilisation plus massage or elbow strapping in overall improvement at one year. However, one RCT identified by the review found significantly greater improvement in symptoms with physiotherapy versus an injection at 26 and 52 weeks. The review found limited evidence of greater self perceived improvement at four weeks with a corticosteroid injection versus an oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and found greater improvement in pain at 26 weeks with an oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Unknown effectiveness

Acupuncture

One systematic review and one subsequent RCT found insufficient evidence to assess the effects of acupuncture (either needle or laser).

Exercise and mobilisation

One systematic review found limited evidence of a better outcome with exercise versus ultrasound plus friction massage at eight weeks.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy

One systematic review found conflicting evidence from two RCTs of the effects on symptoms of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus sham treatment.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for longer term pain relief

We found insufficient evidence to assess the longer term effects of oral or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Orthoses

One systematic review found insufficient evidence about the effects of orthoses (braces).

Surgery

One systematic review found no RCTs of surgical treatment for tennis elbow.

Search date August 2002

Inline graphicClinical Evidence (www.clinicalevidence.com) is a compendium of the best available evidence on common and important clinical questions

The full content of Clinical Evidence is available online (www.clinicalevidence.com); topics are up dated every eight months.


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES