Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2024 Jul 8;26(28):5888–5892. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01670

Telescoping a Prenyltransferase and a Diterpene Synthase to Transform Unnatural FPP Derivatives to Diterpenoids

Henry Struwe †, Heng Li ‡, Finn Schrödter †, Laurent Höft †, Jörg Fohrer §, Jeroen S Dickschat ‡,*, Andreas Kirschning †,∥,*
PMCID: PMC11267608  PMID: 38976793

Abstract

graphic file with name ol4c01670_0006.jpg

New diterpenoids are accessible from non-natural FPP derivatives as substrates for an enzymatic elongation cyclization cascade using the geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (GGPPS) from Streptomyces cyaneofuscatus and the spata-13,17-diene synthase (SpS) from Streptomyces xinghaiensis. This approach led to four new biotransformation products including three new cyclododecane cores and a macrocyclic ether. For the first time, a 1,12-terpene cyclization was observed when shifting the central olefinic double bond toward the geminial methyl groups creating a nonconjugated 1,4-diene.


Terpenoids are formed by a highly modular and iterative process starting from two C5 building blocks, namely, the nucleophilic starter unit isopentenyl pyrophosphate (2, IPP) and the electrophilic dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (1, DMAPP).1 The iterative elongation of DMAPP (1) and higher oligoprenyl pyrophosphates with IPP (2) is promoted by prenyltransferases.1 Successive rounds of elongations first lead to geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP), the precursor of monoterpenes (C10), and then to farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP), geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (3, GGPP), and geranylfarnesyl pyrophosphate (GFPP). From there, a cationic cascade that involves the established repertoire of carbocation chemistry is induced by class I or II terpene synthases (TSs).2 The final carbocations that originate from these cascades are either trapped by deprotonation or nucleophilically by water. As a result, oligocyclic terpenoids such as spata-13,17-diene (4) are formed, which is the product of spata-13,17-diene synthase (SpS) from Streptomyces xinghaiensis.3 Tailoring enzymes including oxygenases and acyl transferases then provide the final biosynthetic products. In the case of the oxidized diterpene spatol (5),4 known from different brown algae, the skeleton bears the opposite absolute configuration of that of the product formed by SpS (Scheme 1A).5

Scheme 1. (A) Overview on the Biosynthesis of Spata-13,17-diene (4) from C5 Precursors DMAPP (1) and IPP (2) via GGPP (3) and Structure of Spatol (5) and (B) Elongation of FPP Derivatives 6–8 and Cyclization of Intermediate GGPP Derivatives 9a–9c Reported in This Work.

Scheme 1

With the exception of noncanonical enzymes,6−9 the natural substrates of TSs are the aforementioned acyclic pyrophosphates, but TSs are also known to exhibit a remarkable substrate tolerance,10 accepting not only halogenated terpenoid precursors11−13 but also oxygenated compounds14−16 or (thio)ether derivatives.17 If the terpene precursors exhibit altered methylation patterns18,19 or shifted double bonds,20 new reaction pathways lead to novel terpenes with previously unknown backbones.

In contrast, the substrate promiscuity of elongating enzymes such as GGPP have not been probed to the same extent. Here, we provide the first examples of using unnatural FPP derivatives in a cascaded biotransformation that is based on the GGPP synthase (GGPPS) from Streptomyces cyaneofuscatus(21) and the diterpene synthase SpS thereby probing the substrate scope of two enzymes. For this purpose, the non-natural FPP derivatives 6–8 were chosen (Scheme 1B).

While the syntheses of FPP ether derivative 6(17) as well as FPP derivative 8(22) with a shifted central olefinic double bond have been reported before, the nor-FPP derivative 7 is a so far unknown substrate. Its synthesis commenced from (E)-hex-3-enedioic acid (10; Scheme 2). Esterification, reduction, and selective monoprotection of one alcohol provided silylether 11. Dess-Martin oxidation, Wittig olefination, and O-desilylation provided allyl alcohol 12. A two-step protocol initiated by Appel bromination followed by introduction of the phenylsulfonyl group yielded sulfone 13. The lithiated derivative was next alkylated with known bromide 14,17 and the resulting sulfone 15 was reductively desulfonylated. Finally, the terminal alcohol was liberated, and based on an established protocol reported by Poulter et al. the target pyrophosphate 7 was collected as trisammonium salt.23

Scheme 2. Synthesis of FPP Derivative 7.

Scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: (a) H2SO4, MeOH, Δ (90%); (b) DIBAL-H, THF, −78 °C (96%); (c) TBDPSCl, imidazole, N,N-DMF, rt (67%); (d) Dess-Martin periodinane, THF, 0 °C to rt; (e) i-PrPPh3I, n-BuLi, THF, 0 °C to rt to 40 °C; (f) TBAF, THF, 0 °C to rt (50% over three steps); (g) CBr4, PPh3, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt (quant.); (h) NaSO2Ph, N,N-DMF, 50 °C to rt (60%); (i) n-BuLi, THF, bromide 14, −78 °C to rt (80%); (j) Na2HPO4, Na–Hg, THF, MeOH, −14 °C to rt (95%); (k) TBAF, THF, 0 °C to rt (91%); (l) Et3N, MsCl, LiCl, THF, 0 °C, then ((n-Bu)4N)3P2O7H, MeCN, rt (91% over two steps).

The synthetic FPP derivatives 6–8 (50 μg for screening) were elongated with IPP and cyclized using a mixture of recombinant purified GGPPS and SpS. Product formation was detected by GC-MS. After having confirmed successful enzyme transformations, the biotransformations were upscaled to conversions of 6 (45 mg), 7 (46 mg), and 8 (119 mg) with the addition of appropriate amounts of IPP and enzymes (cf. SI for details), followed by product isolation. While SpS naturally catalyzes an initial 1,10-cyclization, as a consequence of the inserted oxygen atom in 6 or the shifted double bond in 7 and 8, respectively, in all three cases, new cyclization modes toward 11- or 12-membered macrocyclic terpenoids were observed (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3. Overview on Biotransformations (Ring Sizes Are Labelled).

Scheme 3

The structure elucidation of the new terpenoids was based on NMR spectroscopy relying on the key H,H COSY and HMBC correlations summarized in Scheme 4. The number of alkene groups present in macrocyclic ether 16 proved that the product was the result of only one cyclization step. Chemical shifts (δ = 1.67 and 1.59 ppm, respectively) and multiplicities (both singlets) of the germinal methyl groups in 16 suggest that they are allylic in nature. Also a conformational analysis of 16 was conducted in a similar way to that reported for germacrenes by conducting 1D-NOE experiments (Scheme 4 and SI).18,24

Scheme 4. Details on the Structure Elucidation of Macrocycles 16–18 by NMR Analysis.

Scheme 4

1D NOE correlation between methyl groups (δ= 1.44 ppm and δ= 1.59 ppm); the alternate conformation with both methyl groups pointing upward not shown.

Peak broadening in the NMR spectra especially for macrocyclic ether 16, a frequently observed phenomenon for conformationally flexible but strained terpenes,25 posed a challenge for the structure elucidation here. In particular, the 13C signal intensities for the carbon atom bearing the stereogenic center as well as for the carbon atoms bound to the ether oxygen atom in 16 were reduced. The 2D data provided some support for achieving a preliminary assignment. Enhanced signal intensities were ultimately obtained when NMR measurements were conducted at an elevated temperature (TNMR = 310.0 K; see SI).

Macrocyle 17 provided well resolved NMR spectra so that structure elucidation was straightforward. Compounds 18a and 18b were isolated as an inseparable mixture (ratio 1:1.1), which complicated structure elucidation (for details, see SI).

Obviously successful elongation of the FPP derivatives 6–8 by GGPPS as well cyclization of intermediates 9a–9c with SpS had occurred. The formation of 16 is explained by a 1,11-cyclization and deprotonation (Scheme 3). Also the biotransformation to 18b requires just a simple 1,12-cyclization and deprotonation from C10 (Scheme 5, loss of Ha).

Scheme 5. Proposed Mechanisms That Lead to Macrocycles 17 and 18a with Shifted Double Bond.

Scheme 5

In contrast, the formation of 17 from 9b and of 18a from 9c showed a surprising shift of the C2–C3 double bond of GGPP to a semicyclic double bond. For 9b, this is explainable by a 1,12-cyclization to the secondary cation 19a that may be a highly transient species (Scheme 5). A 1,5-hydrogen shift of Ha leads to a more stable tertiary cation 20a that yields 17 upon deprotonation (loss of Hb). Experimental and/or theoretical evidence for proton transfers during terpene cyclizations as proposed here has been reported previously for various terpene synthases including inter alia taxadiene synthase,26−28 fusicoccadiene synthase,29 trichodiene synthase,30 sodorifen synthase,31 and spiroluchuene A synthase.32 Interestingly, with substrate 9c, the initial 1,12-cyclization, despite resulting in the tertiary cation 19b, shows the same 1,5-proton shift of Ha to 20b, explaning the formation of 18a through deprotonation from Me20. An alternative explanation for the biosynthesis of 18b is a deprotonation from 20b with a loss of Ha. However, since the formation of 18b either from 19b or from 20b may proceed with a loss of the same proton Ha, it may be difficult to distinguish experimentally between these two scenarios.

Although kinetics have not yet been determined in detail, it can be assumed that GGPP synthase is a slow-acting enzyme, particularly when a terpene synthase is not present. The product GGPP 3 is probably reluctant to leave the enzyme’s active site if cooperation with a terpene synthase, either through direct contact or via the medium, is lacking, since GGPP 3 itself is not essential for the cell. In contrast, the shorter isoprenoid FPP is used for triterpene biosynthesis and is therefore more essential for metabolism than 3.

In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthases exert substrate promiscuity with respect to farnesyl pyrophosphate derivatives and that the resulting new GGPP derivatives are directly transformed into macrocyclic diterpenoids by the dedicated diterpene synthase SpS. The one-pot telescoping using two enzymes as developed here demonstrates the great synthetic potential of these enzyme classes and paves the way to enlarge the number of diterpene backbones considerably.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jörn Droste (Leibniz University Hannover) for expert support in all issues concerning NMR spectroscopic analysis.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01670.

  • Detailed procedures and spectral data (PDF)

Author Contributions

⊥ H.S. and H.L. contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ol4c01670_si_001.pdf (3.2MB, pdf)

References

  1. Lynen F.; Eggerer H.; Henning U.; Kessel I. Farnesyl-pyrophosphat und 3-Methyl-Δ3-butenyl-1-pyrophosphat, die biologischen Vorsstufen des Squalens. Angew. Chem. 1958, 70, 738–742. 10.1002/ange.19580702403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wendt K. U.; Schulz G. E. Isoprenoid biosynthesis: manifold chemistry catalyzed by similar enzymes. Structure 1998, 6, 127–133. 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00015-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rinkel J.; Lauterbach L.; Dickschat J. S. Spata-13,17-diene Synthase—An Enzyme with Sesqui-, Di-, and Sesterterpene Synthase Activity from Streptomyces xinghaiensis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 16385–16389. 10.1002/anie.201711142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ravi B. N.; Wells R. J. A series of new diterpenes from the brown alga Dipholus marginatus (Dictyotaceae). Aust. J. Chem. 1982, 35, 129–144. 10.1071/CH9820129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerwick W. H.; Fenical W.; van Engen D.; Clardy J. Isolation and Structure of Spatol, a Potent Inhibitor of Cell Replication from the Brown Seaweed Spatoglossum schmittii. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7991–7993. 10.1021/ja00547a055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang C.-M.; Cane D. E. Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics of the Biosynthesis of the Earthy Odorant Methylisoborneol in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8908–8909. 10.1021/ja803639g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. von Reuss S.; Domik D.; Lemfack M. C.; Magnus N.; Kai M.; Weise T.; Piechulla B. Sodorifen Biosynthesis in the Rhizobacterium Serratia plymuthica Involves Methylation and Cyclization of MEP-Derived Farnesyl Pyrophosphate by a SAM-Dependent C-Methyltransferase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11855–11862. 10.1021/jacs.8b08510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Magnus N.; von Reuss S. H.; Braack F.; Zhang C.; Baer K.; Koch A.; Hampe P. L.; Sutour S.; Chen F.; Piechulla B. Non-canonical Biosynthesis of Brexane-Type Bishomosesquiterpene Chlororaphen through Two Consecutive Methylation Steps in Pseduomonas chlororaphis O6 and Variovorax boronicumulans PHE5–4. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202303692 10.1002/anie.202303692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duan Y.-T.; Koutsaviti A.; Harizani M.; Ignea C.; Roussis V.; Zhao Y.; Ioannou E.; Kampranis S. C. Widespread biosynthesis of 16-carbon terpenoids in bacteria. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2023, 19, 1532–1539. 10.1038/s41589-023-01445-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harms V.; Kirschning A.; Dickschat J. S. Nature-driven approaches to non-natural terpene analogues. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020, 37, 1080–1097. 10.1039/C9NP00055K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jin Y.; Williams D. C.; Croteau R.; Coates R. M. Taxadiene Synthase-Catalyzed Cyclization of 6-Fluorogeranylgeranyl Diphophate to 7-Fluoroverticillenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7834–7842. 10.1021/ja050592r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller D. J.; Yu F.; Allemann R. K. Aristolochene Synthase-Catalyzed Cyclization of 2-Fluorofarnesyl-Diphosphate to 2-Fluorogermacrene A. ChemBioChem. 2007, 8, 1819–1825. 10.1002/cbic.200700219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cascón O.; Touchet S.; Miller D. J.; Gonzalez V.; Faraldos J. A.; Allemann R. K. Chemoenzymatic preparation of germacrene analogues. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9702–9704. 10.1039/c2cc35542f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Demiray M.; Tang X.; Wirth T.; Faraldos J. A.; Allemann R. K. Concise synthesis of artemisinin from a farnesyl diphosphate analogue. Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 4411–4415. 10.1002/ange.201609557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huynh F.; Grundy D. J.; Jenkins R. L.; Miller D. J.; Allemann R. K. Sesquiterpene Synthase-Catalysed Formation of a New Medium-Sized Cyclic Terpenoid Ether from Farnesyl Diphosphate Analogues. ChemBioChem. 2018, 19, 1834–1838. 10.1002/cbic.201800218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Quan Z.; Hou A.; Goldfuss B.; Dickschat J. S. Mechanism of the Bifunctional Multiple Product Sesterpene Synthase AcAS from Aspergillus calidoustus. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202117273 10.1002/anie.202117273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oberhauser C.; Harms V.; Seidel K.; Schröder B.; Ekramzadeh K.; Beutel S.; Winkler S.; Lauterbach L.; Dickschat J. S.; Kirschning A. Exploiting the synthetic potential of sesquiterpene cyclases for generating unnatural terpenoids. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11802–11806. 10.1002/anie.201805526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Harms V.; Schröder B.; Oberhauser C.; Tran C. D.; Winkler S.; Dräger G.; Kirschning A. Methyl-Shifted Farnesyldiphosphate Derivatives Are Substrates for Sesquiterpene Cyclases. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 4360–4365. 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taizoumbe K. A.; Goldfuss B.; Dickschat J. S. The Diterpenoid Substrate Analogue 19-nor-GGPP Reveals Pronounced Methyl Group Effects in Diterpene Cyclisations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202318375 10.1002/anie.202318375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li H.; Dickschat J. S. Diterpene Biosynthesis from Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate Analogues with Changed Reactivities Expands Skeletal Diversity. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202211054 10.1002/anie.202211054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rabe P.; Rinkel J.; Dolja E.; Schmitz T.; Nubbemeyer B.; Luu T. H.; Dickschat J. S. Mechanistic investigations on two bacterial diterpene cyclases: Spiroviolene Synthase and Tsukubadiene Synthase. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 2776–2779. 10.1002/anie.201612439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Struwe H.; Droste J.; Dhar D.; Davari M. D.; Kirschning A. Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of a New Germacrene Derivative Named Germacrene F. ChemBioChem. 2024, 25, e202300599 10.1002/cbic.202300599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Woodside A. B. Z.; Huang Z.; Poulter C. D. Trisammonium Geranyl Diphosphate. Org. Synth. 1988, 66, 211. 10.15227/orgsyn.066.0211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rinkel J.; Dickschat J. S. Addressing the Chemistry of Germacrene A by Isotope Labeling Experiments. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 2426–2429. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. a Faraldos J. A.; Wu S.; Chappell J.; Coates R. M. Conformational analysis of (+)-germacrene A by variable temperature NMR and NOE spectroscopy. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7733–7742. 10.1016/j.tet.2007.04.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Mitsuhashi T.; Kikuchi T.; Hoshino S.; Ozeki M.; Awakawa T.; Shi S.-P.; Fujita M.; Abe I. Crystalline Sponge Method Enabled the Investigation of a Prenyltransferase-terpene Synthase Chimeric Enzyme, Whose Product Exhibits Broadened NMR Signals. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 5606–5609. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin X.; Hezari M.; Koepp A. E.; Floss H. G.; Croteau R. Mechanism of Taxadiene Synthase, a Diterpene Cyclase That Catalyzes the First Step of Taxol Biosynthesis in Pacific Yew. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 2968–2977. 10.1021/bi9526239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Williams D. C.; Carroll B. J.; Jin Q.; Rithner C. D.; Lenger S. R.; Floss H. G.; Coates R. M.; Williams R. M.; Croteau R. Intramolecular proton transfer in the cyclization of geranylgeranyl diphosphate to the taxadiene precursor of taxol catalyzed by recombinant taxadiene synthase. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 969–977. 10.1016/S1074-5521(00)00046-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hong Y. J.; Tantillo D. J. The Taxadiene-Forming Carbocation Cascade. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18249–18256. 10.1021/ja2055929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Toyomasu T.; Tsukahara M.; Kenmoku H.; Anada M.; Nitta H.; Ohkanda J.; Mitsuhashi W.; Sassa T.; Kato N. Transannular Proton Transfer in the Cyclization of Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate to Fusicoccadiene, a Biosynthetic Intermediate of Fusicoccins. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3044–3047. 10.1021/ol901063s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hong Y. J.; Tantillo D. J. Which Is More Likely in Trichodiene Biosynthesis: Hydride or Proton Transfer?. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4601–4604. 10.1021/ol061884f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu H.; Lauterbach L.; Goldfuss B.; Schnakenburg G.; Dickschat J. S. Fragmentation and [4 + 3] Cycloaddition in Sodorifen Biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15, 1164–1171. 10.1038/s41557-023-01223-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Huang Z.; Taizoumbe K. A.; Liang C.; Goldfuss B.; Xu J.; Dickschat J. S. Spiroluchuene A Synthase: A Cyclase from Aspergillus luchuensis Forming a Spirotetracyclic Diterpene. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202315659 10.1002/anie.202315659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ol4c01670_si_001.pdf (3.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.


Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES