Skip to main content
Emerging Microbes & Infections logoLink to Emerging Microbes & Infections
. 2024 Jun 27;13(1):2373308. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2373308

Genomic characterization of a reemerging Chikungunya outbreak in Kedougou, Southeastern Senegal, 2023

Idrissa Dieng a,*, Bacary Djilocalisse Sadio a,*, Alioune Gaye b, Samba Niang Sagne c, Marie Henriette Dior Ndione a, Mouhamed Kane a, Mamadou Korka Diallo c, Bocar Sow c, Safietou Sankhe a, Ousseynou Sene a, Amadou Diallo c, Madeleine Dieng a, Serge Freddy Moukaha Doukanda a, Maimouna Mbanne a, Seynabou Mbaye Ba Souna Diop a, Diamilatou Balde a, Mignane Ndiaye a, Khalidou Djibril Sow d, Maryam Diarra c, Abdoulaye Sam e, Ababacar Mbaye f, Boubacar Diallo g, Yoro Sall e, Ousmane Faye g, Boly Diop e, Abdourahmane Sow g,h, Amadou Alpha Sall a, Cheikh Loucoubar c, Ndongo Dia a, Oumar Faye a, Diawo Diallo b, Gamou Fall a, Scott C Weaver i, Mamadou Aliou Barry c, Mawlouth Diallo b, Moussa Moise Diagne a,CONTACT
PMCID: PMC11268258  PMID: 38934257

ABSTRACT

Chikungunya virus has caused millions of cases worldwide over the past 20 years, with recent outbreaks in Kedougou region in the southeastern Senegal, West Africa. Genomic characterization highlights that an ongoing epidemic in Kedougou in 2023 is not due to an introduction event but caused by the re-emergence of an endemic strain evolving linearly in a sylvatic context.

KEYWORDS: Chikungunya, Kedougou, Southeastern Senegal, outbreak, genomic characterization

Introduction

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-borne virus that has caused significant epidemics over the past 20 years with millions of cases reported worldwide. CHIKV is classified into West African (WA), East-Central-South-African (ECSA), Asian genotypes and Indian Ocean lineage [1]. In Senegal, gallery forest mosquitoes maintain a sylvatic transmission cycle where sporadic cases or small outbreaks can occur among humans living in rural areas, while the virus is mainly transmitted by Aedes aegypti in urban settlements [2,3]. Like in other African and Asian countries, a recurring CHIKV resurgence was observed in populations lacking herd immunity [4]. In Senegal, CHIKV outbreaks follow a cyclic pattern in rural regions, reemerging after a period of silence, usually every decade. This pattern aligns with the turnover time needed for susceptible animal hosts, mainly non-human primates [5,6]. After the first isolation from a bat in 1962, the first human infection was reported in Dakar region in 1966 [7] before the first outbreak in 1982 [8]. Later on, several investigations in the western part of the country demonstrated a high seroprevalence rate among whole blood donors in 1996 in Kaffrine as well as acute infections in several health workers from Niakhar in 1997 [9]. More recently in 2006, a cluster of foreign travellers were found infected by the virus after a stay in the neighbourhood of Dakar [10]. Until 1990s, CHIKV was not considered as a public health concern in Southeastern Senegal [11]. However, in-depth studies undertaken in 2000s highlighted the occurrence of zoonotic amplification and sporadic outbreaks [6], the most recent ones being in the Kedougou region [2,12].

Kedougou is a major arbovirus hotspot as highlighted by an extensive surveillance through a nationwide syndromic network and a passive surveillance in public health structures coordinated by the Ministry of Health and the Institut Pasteur de Dakar (IPD) [13] as well as a long-term entomological surveillance [3]. Moreover, the region has recently experienced an economic boom with the intensification of gold mining activity in rural areas, causing migration of human populations from various horizons and subsequent environment changes with an increased risk of pathogens exposition.

Here we carry out the genomic characterization of the CHIKV strain of an ongoing epidemic in Kedougou in 2023.

Materials and methods

Human and mosquito sample collection, and molecular diagnostic assays

Whole blood samples from suspected cases identified during the investigations were collected in EDTA tubes in the different healthcare sites or at the residence of suspected cases, stored in a cool box with ice, and sent on a daily basis to the IPD station in Kedougou for CHIKV molecular diagnostic as previously described [2] before weekly transmission to the WHO collaborating Center for Arboviruses and Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses (CRORA) in IPD in Dakar for complementary laboratory analysis [12]. The clinical criteria pinpointed suspected cases displaying fever along with two or more symptoms like headache, retro-orbital pain, arthralgia, myalgia, nausea/vomiting, or rash. Door-to-door epidemiological investigations targeted individuals who lived or resided in an epidemic area from 1 June 2023 until the investigation date. Confirmed cases fulfilled the clinical criteria and were confirmed via laboratory testing (positive IgM serology, virus detection by PCR). Meanwhile, mosquitoes collected from the entomological investigations in Kedougou were also tested onsite for CHIKV molecular detection.

Next generation sequencing

Samples from confirmed cases with acute infection were processed to obtain the whole genome by a target enrichment standard hybridization workflow using the Twist Biosciences Comprehensive Viral Research Panel (CVRP), comprising approximately one million 120-base pair probes designed to target 15,488 distinct viral strains that infect both humans and animals, as previously described [14]. Briefly, extracted RNA samples were used as a template for a reverse transcription step with the SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher, USA) followed by a DNA fragmentation, telomere repair, dA-Tailing and a ligation with Universal Twist adapters before a final libraries amplification. A single pooled library was finally prepared from the indexed library-prepped samples before hybridization of the targets in solution, then binding of hybridized targets to desired streptavidin beads. Enriched sample libraries obtained as recommended by Twist Technical Support were loaded onto an Illumina iSeq 100 sequencing system as recommended by the manufacturer. Since no CHIKV sequence from the Kedougou 2015 outbreak was available, eight isolates obtained from the CRORA biobank were sequenced for further analysis.

Data analysis

Raw data were collected in fastq format and the genome assembly was performed using the CZ-ID platform, an open-source metagenomics tool available at http://czid.org [15]. Default threshold filters were applied for reads Quality Check, base-calling, and consensus generation. A minimum depth of coverage of 10X was used for base calling. All generated sequences during this work were aligned with a representative dataset of available CHIKV sequences (Appendix 1) using MAFFT with default parameters and a maximum likelihood tree was subsequently performed using IQ-TREE with the best model determined by ModelFinder (MF) as previously described [7]. In parallel a second 1000 iterations-based ML tree built with only WA genotype strains. MF was used again to analyse the WA genotypes sequences dataset that was used as input for the root-to-tip analysis using Tempest [16]. Bayesian phylogenetic trees, calibrated over time, were constructed to estimate the emergence date (time to the most recent common ancestor, TMRCA) of the transmission lineage circulating during the 2023 outbreak. Analysis was performed based on nearly complete genomes using BEAST v.1.10.4 bayesian skygrid model as previously described [17]. tMRCA and 95% HPD interval information related to the emerging 2023 CHIKV clade were added as caption (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Time-scaled phylogenetic tree of sequenced CHIKV strains sampled during Kédougou outbreak in 2023. The tree was constructed using nearly complete genomes of CHIKV. Parent node of the outbreak sequences is annotated with tMRCA and 95% HPD interval of node age.

Amino acid (aa) changes spanning coding region of newly generated CHIKV sequences against human sequence obtained in 2005 in Kedougou (HM045817) were called using a python script according to a previously described protocol [18]. Obtained aa changes are organized by gene and observed frequencies of each aa change in 2015 and 2023 strains were also provided (Table 1).

Table 1.

Non-synonymous mutations were observed in both structural and nonstructural genes in Chikungunya virus strains from 2015 and 2023 in Kedougou.

Proteins class Gene Mutation Mutation frequency
2015 Strains 2023 Strains
Non-structural proteins NSP1 P57S** 0% 100%
I313L*** 100% 100%
NSP2 V153A* 100% 0%
S259T 0% 16.67%
V565A*** 100% 100%
N580S*** 100% 100%
T648N 37.50% 0%
A674V 0% 58.33%
NSP3 T192I*** 100% 100%
P367L* 100% 0%
N385S*** 100% 100%
E438V*** 100% 100%
L461P*** 100% 100%
T509I 12.50% 0%
NSP4 T72M*** 100% 100%
A462T 0% 8.33%
S591C*** 100% 100%
I603V** 0% 100%
Structural proteins C A55T* 100% 0%
N79K* 100% 0%
P92L* 100% 0%
I167V 0% 8.33%
E3
E2 M92T*** 100% 100%
H147Q 0% 16.67%
S380T*** 100% 100%
6K
E1 I280V 0% 8.33%
V342A*** 100% 100%

Note: CHIKV genome from 2005 in Kedougou (HM045817) was taken as reference.

*Unique to 2015 Strains.

**Unique to 2023 Strains.

***Shared by 2015 and 2023 Strains.

Results and discussion

On early August 2023, a cluster of five Chikungunya virus-infected patients in the Kedougou region were identified by one-step RT-qPCR assay [2]. Following the increasing number of cases, an investigation team of both MoH epidemiologists and an IPD multidisciplinary group was mobilized to cover the three health districts of the region (Saraya, Salemata and Kedougou). At the time of writing, more than 200 confirmed cases were reported in the region and the outbreak is expanding to other regions (Communication from the IPD Public Health Direction). The most common symptoms were fever, headaches and myalgia with no severe manifestation (personal communications, manuscript in preparation). Epidemiological investigations showed that suspected cases did not have any travel history outside the Kedougou region during the last two months prior outbreak report (data not shown, manuscript in preparation).

Nine human and three mosquito samples among the positive samples from the ongoing outbreak as well as eight isolates from the previous emergence in 2015 in Kedougou were selected for genomic characterization. The sequencing strategy employed enabled the acquisition of 12 nearly complete genomes, with coverage levels varying from 93.6% to 99.1%. The mean depth coverage achieved was 12,406X, with a range of 56 to 46538X, as detailed in Appendix 2.

The phylogenetic tree showed that viral strain from Kedougou 2023 groups with previous CHIKV from the WA genotype was identified during the more recent outbreaks in Kedougou in 2005 and 2015 (Figure 2). Indeed, blast analysis showed that the circulating strains in 2015 and 2023 exhibited mean nucleotide identity of 98.96% and 98.80% respectively with HM045817 strain obtained from humans in Kedougou in 2005 (Appendix 2). The Bayesian analysis conducted in this study demonstrates that the 2023 outbreak sequences form a monophyletic group, supported by a high posterior value of 1. The estimated time to the tMRCA suggests that the epidemic 2023 Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) strains likely emerged in early 2021, with a 95% highest posterior density (HPD) interval ranging from 2019.97 to 2022.22. This observation aligns with the sporadic serological cases reported in Kedougou in 2021 and 2022, although the data for these cases was not shown. Interestingly, the analysis included strains from the 2015 outbreak, which may have helped refine the results. This finding could aid in conducting in-depth investigations into the viral population dynamics between the 2015 and 2023 outbreaks in the future. Furthermore, the results suggest that the virus emerged at least approximately 1.5 years before being detected in humans during the 2023 outbreak. Given the robust human surveillance programme in Kedougou, this raises the possibility of a cryptic epizootic viral circulation, as previously reported in other studies [12]. Previous works have highlighted that sylvatic circulation can precede epidemic amplifications. These findings underscore the importance of implementing a One Health surveillance programme to mitigate virus spillover into human populations and establish early control strategies [5].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic relationship of newly generated CHIKV sequences and those previously available. Tree was annotated with country, year of sampling and host of West African genotype viral sequences. Only bootstrap values above 70 were represented on corresponding branches. Root-to-tip regression and time-scaled phylogenetic analysis show linear evolution between newly generated Chikungunya virus sequences obtained from the ongoing outbreak in Senegal 2023 and those from 2015 in Kedougou and the other West African genotype sequences.

The polyprotein molecular analysis demonstrated 28 amino acids (aa) changes in both structural and nonstructural genes among either strains from CHIKV 2015 and CHIKV 2023 outbreaks in Kedougou (Table 1).

CHIKV 2015 and CHIKV 2023 polyproteins shared 12 aa substitutions compared to the older CHIKV 2005. Most of them are novel mutations identified in E1, E2 and nsP1-4, with E2-M92 T, E2-S380 T and nsP2-N580S in sites previously associated with type I Interferon modulation, antigenicity and host receptors binding [19,20]. CHIKV 2023 harbours eight unique mutations not seen in the CHIKV 2005 and 2015 strains, among which only two were consistently found in nonstructural proteins in all the generated sequences. Indeed, nsP1-P57S was found in the N-terminus (NT) methyltransferase and guanylyltransferase domain involved in methylation and capping of the newly synthesized RNA [21], while nsP4-I603 V was noted in the gene encoding the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase responsible for replicating viral RNA [22]. The six other CHIKV 2023-specific aa mutations (C-I167 V, E1-I280 V, E2-H147Q, nsP1-S259 T, nsP2-A674 V and nsP4-A462 T) occurred with lower frequency (8–59%) as shown in Table 1, and could then be either transient deleterious mutations which will be purged by purifying selection or potential new major variants whose prevalence is expected to increase as the virus expands.

Overall, the genomic analysis of our study reveals that the ongoing CHIKV epidemic in Kedougou in 2023 can be caused either by the introduction of a new WA CHIKV strain from other locations where undetected outbreaks occurred or by the re-emergence of an endemic WA genotype strain having evolved linearly (R = 0.99) (Figure 1) in a sylvatic in Kedougou context before a spillover event in the rural domain. Indeed, both scenarios are plausible because of (i) Kedougou ecological suitability for arbovirus circulation (favourable climate and abundant biodiversity), and (ii) the region economic growth leading to significant gatherings of human populations from diverse backgrounds, thereby increasing the risk of pathogen introductions.

Conclusion

Our genomic characterization work demonstrates the endemicity of CHIKV in eastern Senegal and the constant threat it poses in terms of public health with cyclic resurgences. Indeed, the pathogen responsible for the 2023 epidemic arises from the regular molecular evolution of the strains from the 2005 and 2015 outbreaks. This supports previous work which highlights that the particular ecology of the Kedougou region, where human settlements overlap with the wild environment, allows the maintenance of the virus via potential non-human reservoirs and sylvatic vectors before spillover events [5,6]. Nonetheless, it is crucial not to overlook the potential for the strain to have been introduced from another infected area to Kedougou, underscoring the broad distribution and propagation of the WA genotype within the subregion.

Given that the main vectors during this epidemic were sylvatic Aedes species (data not shown), it is of interest to evaluate the impact of the different aa substitutions in the virus adaptation to the mosquito species in the region, similarly to what was done with the A226 V amino acid adaptative mutation in the E1 envelope glycoprotein of the ECSA genotype to Ae. albopictus in 2005 [23].

If the contemporary strains presented common features with the causative agents of the previous outbreaks, identification of the phenotypic association with the CHIKV 2023-specific aa changes requires more genomic, epidemiological and experimental data.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material
Supplemental Material

Acknowledgments

We thank the healthcare workers from the Senegalese Ministry of Health for their dedication to outbreak management. We are also grateful to the teams from the different research departments at Institut Pasteur de Dakar.

Appendices.

Appendix 1. Genbank accession numbers

Accession number Year of isolation Country
HM045817 2005 Senegal
AY726732 1983 Senegal
HM045785 1966 Senegal
HM045786 1964 Nigeria
HM045798 1966 Senegal
HM045807 1965 Nigeria
HM045815 1979 Senegal
HM045816 1966 Senegal
HM045818 1981 Cote d’Ivoire
HM045819 1993 Senegal
HM045820 1993 Cote d’Ivoire
KX262986 1983 Senegal
KX262995 1983 Senegal
KJ689453 2013 Micronesia
KJ451623 2013 Micronesia
KY435477 2014 Guyana
KY038946 1975 Central African Republic
KY704954 2016 Brazil

Appendix 2. BLAST hit table of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) sequences from 2015 and 2023 vs CHIKV 2005 (HM045817) and sequencing metrics

Sequence identity Host Max
score
Total
score
Query cover E value Percentage identity Accession
length (nt)
Num.
reads
Depth (X) Coverage (%)
412399 Mosquito 19648 19648 94% 0.0 98.81 11,714 944233 336 99
412625 Mosquito 19647 19647 94% 0.0 98.81 11,702 61266 829 98.9
412720 Mosquito 19551 19551 94% 0.0 98.71 11,595 334482 3459 98
417794 Human 19647 19647 94% 0.0 98.81 11,702 1523545 16782 98.9
417824 Human 19647 19647 94% 0.0 98.81 11,074 5004 56 93.6
425505 Human 19656 19656 94% 0.0 98.82 11,725 157608 2177 99.1
425541 Human 19647 19647 94% 0.0 98.81 11,713 5449 77 99
425581 Human 19651 19651 94% 0.0 98.82 11,713 299183 4221 99
425590 Human 19651 19651 94% 0.0 98.82 11,725 2481764 35524 99.1
425648 Human 19647 19647 94% 0.0 98.81 11,713 2532757 36006 99
425657 Human 19647 19647 94% 0.0 98.81 11,725 199809 2870 99.1
425797 Human 19651 19651 94% 0.0 98.82 11,713 3307797 46538 99
Mean per cent identity against HM045817.1   98.80        

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the NIH West African Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases [grant number U01AI151801-01], the NIH PICREID [grant number U01AI151758], the 2019 Pasteur Network Talent Award won by Dr Oumar Faye, and the Africa CDC Pathogen Genomics Initiative funds [CARES grant 4306-22-EIPHLSSGENOMICS].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1.de Souza WM, de Lima STS, Mello S, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and recurrence of Chikungunya virus in Brazil: an epidemiological study. Lanc Micr. 2023;4(5):e319–e329. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00033-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Diallo D, Sall AA, Buenemann M, et al. Landscape ecology of sylvatic Chikungunya virus and mosquito vectors in southeastern Senegal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1649, doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Diallo M, Thonnon J, Traore-Lamizana M, et al. Vectors of Chikungunya virus in Senegal: current data and transmission cycles. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60(2):281–286. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morrison TE. Reemergence of Chikungunya virus. J Virol. 2014;88(20):11644–11647. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01432-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Althouse BM, Guerbois M, Cummings DAT, et al. Role of monkeys in the sylvatic cycle of Chikungunya virus in Senegal. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1046, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03332-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sow A, Nikolay B, Faye O, et al. Changes in the transmission dynamic of Chikungunya virus in southeastern Senegal. Viruses. 2020;12(2):196, doi: 10.3390/v12020196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roche S, Robin Y.. Human infections by Chikungunya virus in Rufisque (Senegal), October-November, 1966. Bull Soc Med Afr Noire Lang Fr. 1967;12(3):490–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saluzzo JF, Cornet M, et al. Outbreak of a Chikungunya virus epidemic in Western Senegal in 1982. Dakar Med. 1983;28(3):497–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thonnon J, Spiegel A, Diallo M, et al. Chikungunya virus outbreak in Senegal in 1996 and 1997. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1999;92(2):79–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pistone T, Ezzedine K, Boisvert M, et al. Cluster of Chikungunya virus infection in travelers returning from Senegal, 2006. J Trav Med. 2009;16(4):286–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2008.00294.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Monlun E, Zeller HBLG, Traoré-Lamizana M, et al. Surveillance of the circulation of arbovirus of medical interest in the region of Eastern Senegal. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1993;86(1):21–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sow A, Faye O, Diallo M, et al. Chikungunya outbreak in Kedougou, Southeastern Senegal in 2009–2010. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;2(5):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Diagne MM, Ndione MHD, Gaye A, et al. Yellow fever outbreak in Eastern Senegal, 2020–2021. Viruses. 2021;13(8):1475, doi: 10.3390/v13081475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Crispell G, Williams K, Zielinski E, et al. Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region. Front Public Health. 2022;10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mwakibete L, Takahashi S, Ahyong V, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing to characterize potential etiologies of non-malarial fever in a cohort living in a high malaria burden area of Uganda. PLoS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(5):e0001675, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rambaut A, Lam TT, Max Carvalho L, et al. Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly path-O-gen). Virus Evol. 2016;2(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Souza UJB, Santos RND, Giovanetti M, et al. Genomic epidemiology reveals the circulation of the Chikungunya virus east/central/South African lineage in Tocantins state, North Brazil. Viruses. 2022;14(10):2311, doi: 10.3390/v14102311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dieng I, Balde D, Talla C, et al. Molecular evolution of dengue virus 3 in Senegal between 2009 and 2022: dispersal patterns and implications for prevention and therapeutic countermeasures. Vaccines. 2023;11(10):1537, doi: 10.3390/vaccines11101537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sahu A, Das B, Das M, et al. Genetic characterization of E2 region of Chikungunya virus circulating in Odisha, Eastern India from 2010 to 2011. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;18:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.04.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu X, Mutso M, Cherkashchenko L, et al. Identification of natural molecular determinants of ross river virus type I interferon modulation. J Virol. 2020;94(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rana J, Rajasekharan S, Gulati S, et al. Network mapping among the functional domains of Chikungunya virus nonstructural proteins. Proteins. 2014;82(10):2403–2411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen MW, Tan YB, Zheng J, et al. Chikungunya virus nsP4 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase core domain displays detergent-sensitive primer extension and terminal adenylyltransferase activities. Antiviral Res. 2017;143:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tsetsarkin KA, Weaver SC.. Sequential adaptive mutations enhance efficient vector switching by Chikungunya virus and its epidemic emergence. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(12):e1002412, doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material
Supplemental Material

Articles from Emerging Microbes & Infections are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES