Abstract
Although health inequities among Black same gender loving men (SGLM) are well documented (e.g., chronic psychological disorders, HIV, suicide), there are few accessible, culturally affirming, and community-led interventions designed to reduce these inequities. The present manuscript describes the process through which we developed iTHRIVE 365, a multicomponent health-promotion intervention designed by Black SGLM for Black SGLM. We utilized a community-based participatory research approach (CBPR) that included collaboration between THRIVE SS, a Black SGLM-run community-based organization, and a multisectoral team of public health, research, and digital design professionals to develop the intervention. A five-phase development process included four phases of focus groups and a technical pilot to assess community priorities and incorporate input on each feature of the intervention. Directed content analysis indicated that participants wanted a multicomponent and technology-mediated intervention that promotes health knowledge and motivation, Black SGLM social support, access to affirming healthcare, and housing and economic resources. iTHRIVE 365 combines multilevel and culturally affirming intervention features to combat the effects of oppression and ultimately promote Black SGLM’s biopsychosocial health.
Keywords: racial minority, sexual minority, men’s health, community based organizations, intervention
INTRODUCTION
Black gay, bisexual, other same gender loving men (SGLM)a are highly resilient1 and practice positive health behaviors compared to their peers of other racial and sexual identities.2–4 And yet, Black SGLM experience myriad health inequities, including those in chronic psychological disorders,5 HIV,6 and suicide.7 Evidence indicates that health inequities among Black SGLM are connected to experiencing high levels of social isolation,8–12 low access to culturally affirming and effective healthcare,8,13 and barriers to housing, transportation, and other forms of economic empowerment13–15 linked to interpersonal,16–19 institutional,20,21 and structural2,22,23 oppression. Despite this evidence, extant interventions to promote positive health outcomes among Black SGLM largely focus on individual-level approaches, such as reducing substance use and condomless sex, which do not address these root causes of health inequities facing Black SGLM.2,3,24 Additionally, there is a need for interventions that are accessible to Black SGLM, that are developed by Black SGLM, that are rooted in and build upon the strengths and assets of Black SGLM, and respond to community-identified needs. To address this gap in the literature, the present study details a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to developing a multicomponent intervention called iTHRIVE 365 that builds upon Black SGLM community priorities and strengths, combats the impact of multilevel oppression, and promotes biological, psychological, and behavioral health among Black SGLM.
Theoretical Foundation
Intersectionality frameworks identify that factors operating at the social-structural level, including multiple interlocking systems of oppression (e.g., racism, heterosexism, classism), produce and exacerbate social, economic, and health inequties25 at intersecting social positions (e.g., race and gender and sexual identity and socioeconomic status).26–29 Intersectionality work from Bowleg identifies that frequently unacknowledged strengths and resiliencies empower individuals at the intersection of oppressive systems to persevere in the face of these systems, but often at the expense of health, social connections, and other important outcomes.26,27 Accordingly, recent recommendations for best practice in public health have called for interventions that confront the multilevel and intersectional nature of oppression and build on community strengths to reduce health inequities among communities like Black SGLM.30–33 This includes recent recommendations for best practices in HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention34,35 that highlight evidence that the most effective interventions reduce barriers to positive health at the individual level (e.g., health information and motivation),36 interpersonal/network level (e.g., social support networks),34 institutional/health system level (e.g., culturally supportive environments),37–39 and structural level (e.g., access to housing).24
In line with these recommendations, an intervention that employs an integration of Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB),40,41 social capital,42–44 and socioecological45,46 theories of health to combat individual, community, institutional, and structural barriers to health for Black SGLM may be effective. The IMB model posits that individuals must possess the requisite information, motivation to change, and behavioral skills for improving their health.40,41 Public health applications of social capital theory posit that interpersonal bonds can be essential to promoting health42–44 as well as mitigating the negative effects of stigma.47 HIV applications of the socioecological model identify institutional and socioeconomic structural factors as critical predictors of health, including healthcare48,49 and housing50 contexts, because they can affect access to care resources and, as a result, opportunities for positive health. Additionally, evidence indicates that culturally affirmative healthcare can mitigate the negative effects of stigma on HIV-relevant health outcomes.49,51
Community-Based Participatory Research with Black SGLM
Regardless of the theoretical underpinnings, the tenets of CBPR posit that the most effective interventions are consistent with community-identified priorities and are developed by and for the communities they are meant to serve.52–56 This includes core principles of research engagement like taking a collaborative, equitable approach that incorporates the strengths and assets of a community to coproduce sustainable community capacity. It also emphasizes that resources produced by the research process should be in line with community priorities and address the intersections of racism, heterosexism, and other forms of oppression.57 One way to conduct CBPR is within community-based organizations (CBOs) that are run by and rooted in communities, and by involving community members as partners in the intervention development process to ensure the benefits of the intervention ultimately serve the community. In the case of developing a health empowerment intervention for Black SGLM, this can include Black SGLM community members establishing priorities, identifying means to accomplish those priorities, and leading the efforts to develop those means. In the present study, we developed an intervention by and for Black SGLM that utilizes mobile health (mHealth) to promote health education and motivation, social support, access to culturally affirming healthcare, and economic empowerment.
mHealth Interventions for Black SLGM
Recent studies have suggested that interventions that utilize mHealth technologies may be acceptable and feasible for Black SGLM and, if aligned with community priorities, may be effective tools for facilitating health equity for Black SGLM.58,59 For example, recent evidence suggests that internet- and app-based HIV health tools may reduce the negative effects of intersectional stigma60 by effectively providing a platform for social support among Black SGLM61 and connection to critical healthcare resources.62 Additionally, evidence suggests that mHealth tools may be particularly desirable and effective for Black SGLM because they provide low-cost and accessible way of reaching Black SGLM who otherwise may be experiencing practical barriers (e.g., limited funds to reach a physical clinic),63 social barriers (e.g., social isolation linked to intersectional stigma),8,63 and psychological barriers (e.g., anticipated stigma)21 to in-person healthcare. Also, since intersectional stigma affects daily health among Black SGLM,64–66 daily access to mHealth support may be critical. In this study, in particular, the participating Black SGLM community served by THRIVE SS, an Atlanta-based CBO led and operated by Black SGLM for Black SGLM, was primed for an mHealth intervention given they had accessed Facebook forums for Black SGLM social connection over the previous seven years.
Present Study
The present study builds on a collaboration between leaders and members of THRIVE SS, Positive Impact Health Centers, an Atlanta-based HIV/AIDS service organization that provides medical care for people living with HIV, and Rutgers School of Public Health to develop iTHRIVE 365. Our goal in creating iTHRIVE 365 was to develop a health promotion initiative that was consistent with the priorities of Black SGLM that ultimately helps to reduce health inequities experienced by these men. As described below, this collaboration was fostered in service of the development of a multicomponent intervention that employs mHealth tools and is meant to promote the health and well-being of Black SGLM.
METHODS
Research Team and Institutional Environment
THRIVE SS is an Atlanta-based CBO that focuses on health equity for Black SGLM through cultivating peer support, advocacy, and community building. The care from THRIVE SS is based on a model that combines online support, traditional in-person support, and social support to aid Black SGLM in their health management, with a specific focus on HIV care. A key aspect of their online support has been Facebook groups that provide spaces for peer connection and empowerment. Positive Impact Health Centers is an Atlanta-based comprehensive HIV service organization that provides access to HIV testing, prevention, and care, as well as access to behavioral health, case management, and housing. The Rutgers School of Public Health team is a group of scholars with both clinical and research experience with Black SGLM and a focus on promoting health equity through community-driven and social justice-focused interventions.
The collaboration began in 2019 given the shared goal across the teams to support community-developed interventions that promote health equity for Black SGLM. The groups specifically focused on meeting a community-identified need for THRIVE SS to transition away from Facebook group forum spaces for their online support. This need to transition to an alternate online support platform arose from security, privacy, and accessibil‐ ity problems with Facebook forums that included THRIVE SS participants being unduly restricted from using the platform, lacking a way to protect members’ personal data, and having membership information erased. In 2021, to design and develop the app-component of what was eventually referred to as the iTHRIVE 365 intervention, THRIVE SS connected with CorporateLounge, a certified Black woman-owned company that delivers technological design and development, compliance, and project management services. CorporateLounge had partnered with THRIVE SS for three years prior, supporting their website, cloud apps, and power platform services. Throughout 2021, members of CorporateLounge also started attending weekly meetings to discuss the app development process and necessary back-office processes for iTHRIVE 365 success.
Procedures
From August 2020 to August 2021 THRIVE SS, Positive Impact Health Centers, Rutgers School of Public Health, and later CorporateLounge study teams met weekly to plan data collection for this CBPR project. We have decided to structure our community-informed intervention development in five phases: four rounds of qualitative focus groups and a functional pilot (Figure 1). We recruited cisgender and transgender Black SGLM participants from inside and outside of THRIVE SS for both the interviews and the pilot, though the five participants in the functional pilot only included cisgender men. In the different phases, we sought feedback including: 1) initial perspectives on community priorities for an online platforms; 2) feedback on the introduction page, registration process, profile and linkage to care process, calendar and community pages, and additional general feedback on the style and substance of the intervention; 3) feedback on the forums, introduction video, health maintenance reminders, and other app-based content; 4) perspectives on the content provided in the app homepage, including health information and Black LGBTQ community news/information; and 5) feedback on the functionality and performance of the entire intervention. Participants received $20 for their participation in 30–45 minute focus groups described below and $93 for participation in the 14 day pilot. We obtained written consent from all participants prior to participation. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Rutgers School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (Pro2020002582, Pro2021001082).
Figure 1.

iTHRIVE 365 development process.
Focus Group Process.
We conducted the first three focus group phases with 4–6 groups of 3–6 participants each phase in an online Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)-compliant WebEx supported platform. The participants consisted of Black SGLM from THRIVE SS as well as Black SGLM from another CBO in New Jersey named Hetrick-Martin Institute: New Jersey (HMI:NJ). HMI:NJ was focused on supporting and empowering LGBTQ youth of color throughout New Jersey. We incorporated feedback from HMI:NJ to ensure the intervention was appealing to Black SGLM communities broadly and to enable THRIVE SS to more easily scale it to serve communities outside of Atlanta in the future. We stratified the first three focus group phases by age, with participants age 25 and younger together and participants over age 25 together. We did so to ensure that intervention content appealed to relatively younger and older Black SGLM. The fourth phase of focus groups and pilot were only conducted with a group of THRIVE SS participants given HMI:NJ permanently ceased operations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
All focus groups were semistructured and encouraged participants to discuss preferences and perspectives on potential, and later actual, intervention features. The semistructured format provided interviewers with the flexibility to utilize probes to further discuss relevant topics that emerged during the interview.67 We chose to utilize focus groups, because we were most interested in measuring consensus opinions and perspectives among Black SGLM.68 The focus group facilitators were administrators at THRIVE SS and HMI:NJ who were experienced in conducting semistructured focus groups with their members. Both facilitators are service providers for Black SGLM and identify as a Black gay man and a Filipina lesbian woman. In this focus groups, and throughout the process, we were intentional about maximizing racial and sexual identity concordance between research staffand research participants, in keeping with best practices of community engagement.69
Focus Group Content.
The intent of phase one focus groups was to focus on community priorities for an online intervention. To accomplish this goal, questions from the semistructured interview focused on the need for an intervention that integrates online tools to reduce the impact of discrimination (e.g., “THRIVE SS has Facebook groups where Black SGLM are able to connect with one another. Do you think that has helped (or would help) in dealing with discrimination? Tell me how.”) and to ask about what they would want to include in an intervention with online tools (e.g., “What do you think an app like this should include? How else might an app like this help you stay healthy and feeling good?”). As reviewed in the Results section, there was a relatively universal positive evaluation of a potential intervention that utilizes mHealth tools. Based on the initial feedback from focus group participants, the experience and expertise of THRIVE SS leadership, and the app-development expertise at CorporateLounge, we developed an initial draft of the intervention. This included an introduction page, known as a splash page, a registration page, a welcome page, a linkage to care page, and a profile page.
In the next three focus group phases, participants provided feedback on the design and development of different functions of the app portion of the intervention recommended by participants and THRIVE SS leadership. In phase 2, this included the registration and sign-in process, profile functionality, and medication reminder functionality (e.g., “How was the registration process?” [registration process], “Are you comfortable putting in personal information? Would you use this for linkage to care and other resources? Why or why not?” [profile feature], “What services would THRIVE SS be able to offer BSLGM through the app?” [linkage feature]). In phase 3, we asked for feedback on the community calendars and forums, interpersonal chat, and health reminders (e.g., “What are your thoughts on navigating the community and calendar features?” [community calendar], “What do you think about the format of the chat feature?” [interpersonal chat]). In phase 4, we asked for feedback on intervention content, the relationship between app features, and overall functionality (e.g., “What additional content or information you would like to have in this section?” [content]; “What do you think about the placement of the content in the scrolling rotating panel?”). We transcribed all audio recordings of the focus groups following their recording. In the small functional pilot, we examined the daily functionality of the entire app with five SGLM connected to THRIVE SS accessing the intervention for one week to provide feedback on its performance.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
We analyzed the qualitative data using a directed content analysis approach70 within NVivo software. In this coding, the second author, a Black queer man and the cofirst author, a White primarily heterosexual man, focused on semantic codes that pertained to concrete recommendations from the participants for intervention priorities based on the opinions participants expressed about the intervention features. For each phase, the collaborators at Positive Impact Health Centers and Rutgers School of Public Health summarized the results for the THRIVE SS team, which considered costs and benefits, including financial constraints, and institutional expertise and priorities, of each potential intervention feature. THRIVE SS then provided CorporateLounge directives for additions and revisions based on the available development tools. Subsequently, THRIVE SS would engage in a weekly iterative process with CorporateLounge to produce updated versions of the intervention (Figure 1). As such, THRIVE SS maintained autonomy in decision-making for intervention features.
RESULTS
Demographic information for focus group and small pilot participants is included in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Demographic Characteristics of Participants in Focus Groups and Pilot
| Demographic characteristics | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| 16–20 | 5 | 16.7 |
| 21–25 | 11 | 36.6 |
| 29–40 | 5 | 16.7 |
| 41–52 | 4 | 13.3 |
| 53–72 | 5 | 16.7 |
| Sexual Identity | ||
| Gay | 20 | 66.7 |
| Bisexual | 5 | 16.7 |
| Same Gender Loving | 2 | 6.7 |
| Queer | 1 | 3.3 |
| Other | 2 | 6.7 |
| Race | ||
| Black/African American only | 27 | 90.0 |
| Black/African American and American Indian/Alaskan Native | 2 | 6.7 |
| Black/African American and Asian | 1 | 3.3 |
| Affiliated CBO | ||
| HMI:NJ | 7 | 23.3 |
| THRIVE SS | 23 | 76.7 |
iTHRIVE 365 Strategies and Elements
Based on the initial feedback from focus group participants, the experience and expertise of THRIVE SS leadership, and the options available through the app-development technology at CorporateLounge, the team identified four primary community priorities to promote health and combat intersectional oppression in the intervention: 1) promote health knowledge and motivation; 2) foster a sense of community and positive social connections among BMSM; 3) connect BMSM to affirming healthcare, including HIV treatment and mental healthcare; and 4) provide resources for housing, transportation, and other economic empowerment. To accomplish these priorities, and in line with best practices for mHealth intervention approaches,71,72 we identified intervention elements to accomplish intervention strategies matching the community priorities. Intervention elements included: 1) weekly HIV and psychological information and motivation content and daily health notifications; 2) online moderated forums, interpersonal chat, and community calendars; 3) linkage to healthcare via THRIVE SS’s network of BMSM-affirming providers; and 4) housing and economic resources through THRIVE SS’s direct support and referral network (Figure 2). Example qualitative themes, quotes, and corresponding intervention strategies and elements are provided in Table 2. Revisions from phase 2–4 focus groups are available in Table 3. The functional pilot yielded feedback on streamlining the registration process for users and adding more Black SLGM to the online space to create the feeling of community within the app. Overall, the feedback from these phases led to the development of the intervention element content described below.
Figure 2.

iTHRIVE 365 intervention strategies and elements.
TABLE 2.
Exemplar Themes, Quotes, and Corresponding Intervention Strategies and Elements Identified in Round 1 Qualitative Focus Groups
| Theme | Definition | Illustrative quote | iTHRIVE 365 strategy | iTHRIVE 365 element |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Health education | Interest in having the app to teach more about HIV, medications, treatments, safe sex tips, and health outside of HIV (e.g., mental health) |
|
Increase health knowledge | HIV and mental health education |
| 2. Health reminders | A desire for health reminders to motivate them to maintain positive health practices like exercise and doctor appointments |
|
Increase health motivation | Daily health maintenance reminders |
| 3. Connection through shared experiences | The need to feel safe and validated through shared connections with others. While multiple participants identified being part of a community (e.g., neighborhood, school), they acknowledged the difficulty of finding people with similar experiences (e.g., Black SGLM-affirming churches) |
|
Increase social support | Moderated forums and interpersonal chat |
| 4. Calendar of events and social activities | Interest in using an app to see an active calendar of Black SGLM outreach events and social activities |
|
Increase social support | Community calendar |
| 5. Directory and connection to a variety of healthcare providers | The importance of being able to locate different types of providers that span: HIV providers, mental health practitioners, primary care providers, gender affirmation providers, and other LGBTQ-affirming providers |
|
Increase access to affirming healthcare | Connect clients to Black SGLM-affirming healthcare |
| 6. Multilevel support | Participants would like the intervention to have supports for: finances, housing, preparing for retirement, finding employment, and adoption |
|
Increase access to housing and economic resources | Provide resources for housing, transportation, and other economic empowerment |
TABLE 3.
Exemplar Applications of Rounds 2–4 Qualitative Data to iTHRIVE 365 Intervention Features
| Focus group round | Theme | Illustrative quote | Relevant intervention feature | Intervention additions/ Revisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | LGBTQ+Friendly |
|
Splash screen | Using Black SGLM as terminology instead of Black gay men to include the larger Black Queer community |
| Round 3 | Safety |
|
Community Forums | The creation of a “Community Forums Guidelines” notice with parameters of acceptable communication within community forums |
| Round 4 | Adding content to promote interaction in the app |
|
Content | Featuring opportunities in the community forums section for users to comment on featured articles |
iTHRIVE 365 Content
Sample screenshots of intervention content are available in Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Screenshots of iTHRIVE 365 mHealth App, highlighting the home screen and linkage to care features
Health Knowledge and Motivation Content.
This content includes a health maintenance notification system and weekly posts covering HIV and psychological health content tailored to Black SGLM (Table 2, rows 1–2). The health maintenance notification system allows users to input the timing and dosage of medications or health practices (e.g., mindfulness meditation), so they receive push notifications based on their needs.
The HIV health content includes educational and motivational material developed by THRIVE SS and Rutgers School of Public Health that is consistent with evidence-based HIV treatment approaches.73,74 For example, one exercise guides users through considering barriers (e.g., intersectional stigma toward Black SGLM), solutions, and plans to engage in a positive HIV-related behavior. Another exercise provides information on Undetectable = Untransmittable and guides users through considering their experiences with HIV, including what is colloquially known among Black SGLM at THRIVE SS as a seroversary (i.e., anniversary of seroconversion).
The psychological health content includes psychoeducation and exercises that are consistent with participants feedback of wanting positive content (e.g., “There has to be…something that is bright, something that is going to bring happiness out”) and THRIVE SS’s approach to empowering Black SLGM with an assets- and resilience-focused approaches to combat negative, stigmatizing messages directed at Black SLGM in U.S. society. Accordingly, we adapted psychoeducation and exercises for Black SGLM from positive psychology (PPI),75 cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT),76 and dialectic behavioral therapies (DBT; Table 1)77 that aim to foster a positive framing, acceptance, self-reflection, and interpersonal efficacy. Positive psychology content focuses on building strengths and enhancing well-being through gratitude, forgiveness, and positive visualization exercises. For instance, one article includes a daily affirmation journal with prompts for positive reflections (e.g., “Today I am grateful for…”), which features a Black SGLM couple and other positive images of Black SGLM from THRIVE SS’s past BGLM affirmation work (https://thrivess.org/ithrive-gallery/).
CBT content78 includes cognitive restructuring exercises, engaging in emotional reflection, effectively expressing emotions, and behavioral activation. For example, one behavioral activation exercise focuses on the link between desirable activities and positive mood and helps users to develop a plan to engage in those activities. We tailored this for Black SGLM to include culturally relevant examples of desirable behaviors (e.g., connecting with the Silver Linings Project [a supportive space for older Black SLGM]). The DBT content provides participants with information and practice in DBT skills such as wise mind, mindfulness, and effective communication.77 For example, one article provides psychoeducation on flight-or-fight responses to stress for Black SGLM (e.g., racism, heterosexism) and guides users through a progressive muscle relaxation exercise.
Social Support Content.
This includes a community calendar that provides up-to-date information on THRIVE SS-led and other Black SGLM community events in the Atlanta area and provides the opportunity for users to receive reminder push notifications about them (Table 2, rows 3–4). The social support content also includes a moderated forum with discussions on topics generated by THRIVE SS staffand/or proposed by users and approved by staff. Moderated forums have supported discussions on popular topics like Black SGLM confronting intersectional stigma, HIV medication side effects, shared interests, and popular culture. Consistent with the feedback from phase one focus groups (Table 2, row 5), the forums support conversation around more than just health, including finances, music, pop culture, and include articles on Black SLGM-relevant topics in iTHRIVE 365’s CSS news feed and sex positive short stories. Forums include community guidelines that require users to refrain from personal attacks, hateful language, and other forms of communication that may cause forums to be unsafe for users. Forum moderators are Black SGLM THRIVE SS staffwho identify violations of community guidelines and remediate those violations. The interpersonal chat is a private chat between two users. The private chat is only restricted if a user reports a violation of community guidelines.
Linkage to Affirming Healthcare.
This feature allows users to request THRIVE SS institutional support including linkage to medical care, psychotherapy, HIV care, peer support groups, and COVID-related care (Table 2, row 5). THRIVE SS draws on a network of Black SGLM-affirming healthcare providers in the Atlanta metro area (e.g., AboluteCare, AHF Health Centers). This network was developed and vetted by THRIVE SS over the last 10 years through site visits and qualitative evaluations from THRIVE SS staff and members that assess aspects of affirming contexts such as ease of access, patient comfort, and provider cultural humility.
Housing and Economic Empowerment Resources.
This feature allows users to request cost-free transportation, food assistance, culturally appropriate clothes, and connection to housing support (Table 2, row 6). Transportation costs are covered through paid transit passes and direct cash assistance. Clothes and food assistance are provided onsite at THRIVE SS’s Atlanta location and through THRIVE SS partner organizations (e.g., Feed Thee Inc., Midwest Food Bank). Housing support is provided by THRIVE SS case workers and includes connection to transitional housing at a THRIVE SS-owned transitional home that provides housing for up to five months for those seeking a permanent residence and referrals to housing vouchers, rental assistance, and other housing support in THRIVE SS’s network (e.g., Partners for Home).
Both healthcare and economic resources linkage requests are managed by a THRIVE SS case worker. Case workers respond to all linkage requests within 48 business hours and maintain contact with users until connection with the provider occurs. Providers are identified from THRIVE SS’s 20 Atlanta-area partner organizations.79
DISCUSSION
iTHRIVE 365 is a multicomponent, technology-mediated intervention that promotes health knowledge and motivation, Black SGLM social support, access to affirming healthcare, and housing and economic resources to address barriers to health at multiple socioecological levels faced by Black SGLM. We developed the intervention to meet a Black SGLM community priority identified by THRIVE SS and their members for a secure, community-run online space, and resources to combat intersectional oppression and other barriers to health at the individual, community, institutional, and structural levels. The development of iTHRIVE 365 was informed by several rounds of focus groups with Black SGLM from two CBOs and all decisions for the inclusion of intervention content were made by THRIVE SS, with consultation from CorporateLounge (app developer), Positive Impact Health Centers (community-based HIV healthcare and case management provider), and Rutgers School of Public Health (scientific partner) teams. As such, iTHRIVE 365 is a novel health promotion intervention for Black SGLM, developed by Black SGLM, in line with the priorities identified by Black SLGM, and with the assistance of a multisectoral team.
Our research extends previous work to develop mHealth technologies to address HIV among Black SGLM as we developed iTHRIVE 365 using a CBPR framework to guide the development and implementation of the intervention.24 As a technological tool that was built to meet a community-identified priority within THRIVE SS’s membership base, a community that already exists within an online digital environment, iTHRIVE 365 has a built-in user base. The community-driven development and implementation of iTHRIVE 365 suggest that the intervention will have sustainability beyond the end of research studies and/or grants. For example, THRIVE SS plans to continue to administer and refine iTHRIVE 365 in the coming years based on community feedback (e.g., improving chat features and bolstering accessibility features). This is critical given the history of interventions to address HIV among Black SGLM being discontinued after research grant cycles end, even if the interventions are found to be efficacious. Additionally, as an intervention developed within a CBPR framework, THRIVE SS had the final determination on the elements that are integrated into the iTHRIVE 365 app. THRIVE SS is an organization led by Black SGLM, and as a function of being founded in, and run by, the community, has the trust and respect of the community. This process also facilitates rapid dissemination of lessons learned from the intervention back into THRIVE SS for its staff and members to integrate into other programmatic activities. Further, by working with CorporateLounge, a Black woman-owned technology company, we prioritized equity by investing resources in historically marginalized communities throughout the intervention development process itself.
Regarding its place within the theoretical literature, iTHRIVE 365 incorporates community-identified priorities that are consistent with Information-Motivation-Behavioral (IMB) skills,40,41 social capital,42–44 and socioecological45,46 models of health behavior. In line with IMB model,40,41 iTHRIVE 365 offers daily health maintenance reminders (e.g., customized pill reminders) and weekly health education and motivation content to promote health knowledge and motivation to maintain HIV-related and psychological health. In line with social capital theories of health,42–44 iTHRIVE 365 provides online moderated community forums and calendars and an interpersonal chat aimed at reducing social isolation and promoting social support among Black SGLM. In line with the socioecological models of health,45,46 to address institutional barriers to health, iTHRIVE 365 provides linkage to culturally affirming biopsychosocial healthcare for Black SGLM through THRIVE SS’s network of Black SGLM-affirmative healthcare (e.g., primary care, HIV care, mental healthcare) providers. And to address barriers to housing and economic empowerment, iTHRIVE 365 provides connections to housing assistance and other forms of economic empowerment like food and transportation assistance that are foundational services for THRIVE SS. Thus, iTHRIVE 365 combines an mHealth health app and institutional support from THRIVE SS, consistent with the public health and mobile app industry best practices for maintaining community engagement and impact.71,79
Regarding its place in the empirical literature, iTHRIVE 365 is consistent with best-practices in mHealth intervention as it employs community-developed intervention elements to serve intervention strategies to reach community-identified intervention aims.71,72 In providing connections to psychological healthcare, housing, and economic empowerment resources, iTHRIVE 365 fills a gap in intervention research that tends to focus on individual-level health behaviors without addressing institutional and structural barriers that drive health inequities among Black SLGM.3,24,80 Additionally, many of the iTHRIVE 365 features are consistent with evidence-based health promotion approaches including the Black SGLM-tailored psychological and HIV health information,73–77 the maintenance notification system with automated push notifications for health practices,82–84 and moderated Black SGLM community forums.47–52 Critically, iTHRIVE 365 employs community-developed strategies that promote social capital42–44 and affirming healthcare,48,49 and that have been found to mitigate the negative impact of intersectional stigma on Black SLGM’s HIV-related and psychological health.13,47,51,61,85–89
While ITHRIVE 365 is a novel and innovative intervention, there are some limitations that are worth noting. First, although the intervention provides support to reduce the impact of barriers at multiple levels of the social ecological model, it is limited because it is only delivered at the individual and community levels (i.e., within individuals and groups of THRIVE SS members). To truly eliminate health inequities for Black SGLM, we must rectify the multilevel drivers of these inequities, such as inequalities in wealth, housing, education, and incarceration through robust and intersectional policy intervention (e.g., increasing affordable housing for Black SGLM).90 Second, there were several priorities identified by participants that THRIVE SS was not able to include in the intervention as a result of funding and technological limitations (e.g., geomapping to locate where healthcare and community sites are within the Atlanta area). With additional resources, the team will consider adding these features. Finally, in future research, we need to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of iTHRIVE 365 to examine if the ways in which we incorporated community perspectives translated into an engaging and impactful intervention.
CONCLUSION
iTHRIVE 365 can serve as a model for future interventions aiming to reduce health inequities among Black SGLM. By integrating the use of an mHealth tool into an already existing support network of Black SGLM, iTHRIVE 365 has the potential to transform the healthcare landscape for Black SGLM by offering a readily accessible portal to support the physical and mental health of Black SGLM. We were intentional about the partnerships forged in the development of the intervention, with the goal of ensuring that Black SGLM are leading throughout every step of the process, putting into practice the notion that Black SGLM ourselves should guide the efforts to develop interventions to support the health and well-being of our own communities. This type of sustained investment and leadership from Black SGLM is needed to end psychological, HIV, and other health inequities we face.
Statement of Public Health Significance:
Given the continued devastating impact of HIV, mental health, and other health inequities facing Black same gender loving men (SGLM), there is an urgent need for interventions that address the multilevel drivers of these inequities. The iTHRIVE 365 intervention helps to meet that need as a technology-mediated, multicomponent intervention developed by Black SGLM for Black SLGM that promotes health knowledge and motivation, Black SGLM social support, access to affirming healthcare, and housing and economic resources.
Funding.
This study was supported by a research grant from the National Institute on Mental Health (K01-MH118091, PI: English).
Footnotes
We use language SGLM as this is consistent with that used in THRIVE SS programming.
Disclosure. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or any other institution. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- [1].Dacus J-d. Strengths and Resiliencies of Black MSM in New York City Who Maintain HIV-seronegativity [Ph.D.]. Ann Arbor, City University of New York; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Matthews DD, Smith JC, Brown AL, Malebranche DJ. Reconciling epidemiology and social justice in the public health discourse around the sexual networks of black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(5):808–814. 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, Bakeman R. Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS. 2007;21(15):2083–2091. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282e9a64b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Vincent W, Peterson JL, Huebner DM, et al. Resilience and depression in young black men who have sex with men: a social-ecological model. Stigma Health. 2020;5(3):364–374. 10.1037/sah0000206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].American Psychological Association. APA working group on health disparities in boys and men. health disparities racial/ethnic and sexual minority boys and men. 2018. http://www.apa.org/pi/health-disparities/resources/race-sexuality-men.aspx
- [6].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and African American gay and bisexual men. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/bmsm.html
- [7].O’Donnell S, Meyer IH, Schwartz S. Increased risk of suicide attempts among black and Latino lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(6):1055–1059. 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Maulsby C, Millett G, Lindsey K, et al. HIV among black men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States: a review of the literature. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(1):10–25. 10.1007/s10461-013-0476-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Saleh LD, van den Berg JJ, Chambers CS, Operario D. Social support, psychological vulnerability, and HIV risk among African American men who have sex with men. Psychol Health. 2016;31(5):549–564. 10.1080/08870446.2015.1120301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].LeGrand S, Muessig KE, Pike EC, Baltierra N, Hightow-Weidman LB. If you build it will they come? addressing social isolation within a technology-based HIV intervention for young black men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 2014;26(9):1194–1200. 10.1080/09540121.2014.894608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Cranston K, et al. Sexual mixing patterns and partner characteristics of black MSM in Massachusetts at increased risk for HIV infection and transmission. J Urban Health. 2009;86(4):602–623. 10.1007/s11524-009-9363-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Buttram ME, Kurtz SP. A mixed methods study of health and social disparities among substance-using African American/black men who have sex with men. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015;2(1):1–10. 10.1007/s40615-014-0042-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Levy ME, Wilton L, Phillips G, et al. Understanding structural barriers to accessing HIV testing and prevention services among black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(5):972–996. 10.1007/s10461-014-0719-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Wilton L Men who have sex with men of color in the age of AIDS: the sociocultural contexts of stigma, marginalization, and structural inequalities. In: Stone V, Ojikutu B, Rawlings MK, Smith KY, eds. HIV/AIDS in U.S. Communities of Color. Vol 2009., Springer; :179–211. [Google Scholar]
- [15].Sullivan PS, Knox J, Jones J, et al. Understanding disparities in viral suppression among black MSM living with HIV in Atlanta Georgia. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(4). 10.1002/jia2.25689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].English D, Hickson DA, Callander D, Goodman MS, Duncan DT. Racial discrimination, sexual partner race/ethnicity, and depressive symptoms among black sexual minority men. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49(5):1799–1809. 10.1007/s10508-020-01647-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Jackson SD, Mohr JJ, Sarno EL, Kindahl AM, Jones IL. Intersectional experiences, stigma-related stress, and psychological health among black LGBQ individuals. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020;88(5):416–428. 10.1037/ccp0000489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Quinn K, Bowleg L, Dickson-Gomez J. “The fear of being black plus the fear of being gay”: the effects of intersectional stigma on PrEP use among young black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Soc Sci Med. 2019;232:86–93. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Vincent W, Pollack LM, Huebner DM, et al. HIV risk and multiple sources of heterosexism among young black men who have sex with men. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85(12):1122–1130. 10.1037/ccp0000235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Duncan DT, Callander D, Bowleg L, et al. Intersectional analysis of life stress, incarceration and sexual health risk practices among cisgender Black gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the deep south of the US: the MARI study. Sex Health. 2020;17(1):38–44. 10.1071/SH19062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Kegler C, et al. The role of stigma and medical mistrust in the routine health care engagement of black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(2):e75–82. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].English D, Carter JA, Boone CA, et al. Intersecting structural oppression and black sexual minority men’s health. Am J Prev Med. 2021;60(6):781–791. 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Baugher AR, Whiteman A, Jeffries WL, et al. Black men who have sex with men living in states with HIV criminalization laws report high stigma, 23 U.S. cities, 2017. AIDS. 2021;35(10):1637–1645. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Goldhammer H, Mayer KH, Marc LG, et al. HIV care continuum interventions for black men who have sex with men in the USA. Lancet HIV. 2021;8(12):e776–e786. 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00241-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Bowleg L Towards a critical health equity research stance: why epistemology and methodology matter more than qualitative methods. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(5):677–684. 10.1177/1090198117728760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Bowleg L The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1267–1273. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Bowleg L “Once you’ve blended the cake, you can’t take the parts back to the main ingredients”: black gay and bisexual men’s descriptions and experiences of intersectionality. Sex Roles. 2013;68(11–12):754–767. 10.1007/s11199-012-0152-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Crenshaw K Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. U Chi Legal F. 1989:139. [Google Scholar]
- [29].Collins PH. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment; 2002.
- [30].Agénor M Future directions for incorporating intersectionality into quantitative population health research. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(6):803–806. 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Earnshaw VA, Jonathon Rendina H, Bauer GR, et al. Methods in HIV-related intersectional stigma research: core elements and opportunities. Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S4):S413–S419. 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Bauer GR. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med. 2014;110:10–17. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Del Río-González AM, Holt SL, Bowleg L. Powering and structuring intersectionality: beyond main and interactive associations. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021;49(1):33–37. 10.1007/s10802-020-00720-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Ransome Y, Thurber KA, Swen M, Crawford ND, German D, Dean LT. Social capital and HIV/AIDS in the United States: knowledge, gaps, and future directions. SSM Popul Health. 2018;5:73–85. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Kaufman MR, Cornish F, Zimmerman RS, Johnson BT. Health behavior change models for HIV prevention and AIDS care: practical recommendations for a multi-level approach. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(Suppl 3):S250–8. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Wagner GJ, Bogart LM, Mutchler MG, McDavitt B, Mutepfa KD, Risley B. Increasing antiretroviral adherence for HIV-positive African Americans (Project Rise): a treatment education intervention protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(1). 10.2196/resprot.5245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Carey JW, Carnes N, Schoua-Glusberg A, et al. Barriers and facilitators for antiretroviral treatment adherence among HIV-positive African American and Latino men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2019;31(4):306–324. 10.1521/aeap.2019.31.4.306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Carey JW, Carnes N, Schoua-Glusberg A, et al. Barriers and facilitators for clinical care engagement among HIV-positive African American and Latino men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018;32(5):191–201. 10.1089/apc.2018.0018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Bogart LM, Mutchler MG, McDavitt B, et al. A randomized controlled trial of rise, a community-based culturally congruent adherence intervention for black Americans living with HIV. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51(6):868–878. 10.1007/s12160-017-9910-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Fisher WA, Fisher JD, Harman J. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model: a general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. In: Suls J, Wallston KA, eds. Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. Vol ., Blackwell Publishing; 2003:22., 82–106. [Google Scholar]
- [41].Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ. An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006;25(4):462–473. 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Bourdieu P The forms of capital. handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. In: Richardson JG, ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Vol ., ; 1986:241., ; 258. [Google Scholar]
- [43].Chen X, Stanton B, Gong J, Fang X, Li X. Personal social capital scale: an instrument for health and behavioral research. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(2):306–317. 10.1093/her/cyn020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Cohen SE, Syme SI. Social Support and Health. Academic Press; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- [45].Bronfenbrenner U The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard university press; 1979. [Google Scholar]
- [46].Spencer MB, Dupree D, Hartmann T. A phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST): a self-organization perspective in context. Dev Psychopathol. 1997;9(4):817–833. 10.1017/s0954579497001454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Case AD, Hunter CD. Counterspaces: a unit of analysis for understanding the role of settings in marginalized individuals’ adaptive responses to oppression. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(1–2):257–270. 10.1007/s10464-012-9497-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Van Wagenen A Ten things: creating inclusive health care environments for LGBT people. Report. 2015. [Google Scholar]
- [49].Keuroghlian AS, Ard KL, Makadon HJ. Advancing health equity for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people through sexual health education and LGBT-affirming health care environments. Sex Health. 2017;14(1):119–122. 10.1071/SH16145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Aidala AA, Sumartojo E. Why housing? AIDS Behav. 2007;11(6 Suppl):1–6. 10.1007/s10461-007-9302-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Layland EK, Carter JA, Perry NS, et al. A systematic review of stigma in sexual and gender minority health interventions. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(5):1200–1210. 10.1093/tbm/ibz200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Salimi Y, Shahandeh K, Malekafzali H, et al. Is community-based participatory research (CBPR) useful? a systematic review on papers in a decade. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(6):386–393. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Rhodes SD, Malow RM, Jolly C. Community-based participatory research: a new and not-sonew approach to HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment. AIDS Educ Prev. 2010;22(3):173–183. 10.1521/aeap.2010.22.3.173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Bogart LM, Uyeda K. Community-based participatory research: partnering with communities for effective and sustainable behavioral health interventions. Health Psychol. 2009;28(4):391–393. 10.1037/a0016387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Coughlin SS. Community-based participatory research studies on HIV/AIDS prevention, 2005–2014. Jacobs J Community Med. 2016;2(1). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Fine M, Torre ME, Oswald AG, Avory S. Critical participatory action research: methods and praxis for intersectional knowledge production. J Couns Psychol. 2021;68(3):344–356. 10.1037/cou0000445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Coombe CM, et al. Community-based participatory research. Urban health. 2019;272. [Google Scholar]
- [58].Holloway IW, Winder TJ, Lea CH, Tan D, Boyd D, Novak D. Technology use and preferences for mobile phone-based HIV prevention and treatment among black young men who have sex with men: exploratory research. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(4). 10.2196/mhealth.6436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Miyashita Ochoa A, Paneda CC, Wu ES, et al. A community-developed, web-based mobile app intervention addressing social work and legal needs of black sexual minority men living with hiv: protocol for a randomized comparison trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10(1). 10.2196/19770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Muessig KE, Golinkoff JM, Hightow-Weidman LB, et al. Increasing HIV testing and viral suppression via stigma reduction in a social networking mobile health intervention among black and Latinx young men and transgender women who have sex with men (HealthMpowerment): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(12). 10.2196/24043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Barry MC, Threats M, Blackburn NA, et al. “Stay strong! keep ya head up! move on! it gets better!!!!”: resilience processes in the healthMpowerment online intervention of young black gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 2018;30(Supp 5):S27–S38. 10.1080/09540121.2018.1510106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Bauermeister JA, Golinkoff JM, Horvath KJ, Hightow-Weidman LB, Sullivan PS, Stephenson R. A multilevel tailored web app–based intervention for linking young men who have sex with men to quality care (get connected): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018;7(8). 10.2196/10444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Scott AJ, Wilson RF. Social determinants of health among African Americans in a rural community in the Deep South: an ecological exploration. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(1). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Rendina HJ, Millar BM, Parsons JT. The critical role of internalized HIV-related stigma in the daily negative affective experiences of HIV-positive gay and bisexual men. J Affect Disord. 2018;227:289–297. 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].English D, Lambert SF, Tynes BM, Bowleg L, Zea MC, Howard LC. Daily multidimensional racial discrimination among black U.S. American adolescents. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2020;66. 10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Eldahan AI, Pachankis JE, Jonathon Rendina H, Ventuneac A, Grov C, Parsons JT. Daily minority stress and affect among gay and bisexual men: a 30-day diary study. J Affect Disord. 2016;190:828–835. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Patton MQ. How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Sage; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- [68].Willig C Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. McGraw-Hill Education: UK; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- [69].Fryer CS, Passmore SR, Maietta RC, et al. The symbolic value and limitations of racial concordance in minority research engagement. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(6):830–841. 10.1177/1049732315575708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. 10.1177/1049732305276687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Mohr DC, Schueller SM, Montague E, Burns MN, Rashidi P. The behavioral intervention technology model: an integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6). 10.2196/jmir.3077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Mohr DC, Schueller SM, Riley WT, et al. Trials of intervention principles: evaluation methods for evolving behavioral intervention technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7). 10.2196/jmir.4391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Bogart LM, Mutchler MG, McDavitt B, et al. A randomized controlled trial of rise, a community-based culturally congruent adherence intervention for black americans living with HIV. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51(6):868–878. 10.1007/s12160-017-9910-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Lauby J, Milnamow M, Joseph HA, et al. Evaluation of project RISE, an HIV prevention intervention for black bisexual men using an ecosystems approach. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(1):164–177. 10.1007/s10461-017-1892-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Carr A, Cullen K, Keeney C, et al. Effectiveness of positive psychology interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2021;16(6):749–769. 10.1080/17439760.2020.1818807 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(1):17–31. 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM, et al. Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(7):757–766. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Beck JS. Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond. Guilford Publications; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [79].THRIVE SS. 2020 Annual Report. 2020. https://thrivess.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Updated-2020-Annual-Report.pdf
- [80].Peiris D, Miranda JJ, Mohr DC. Going beyond killer apps: building a better mHealth evidence base. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(1). 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(6):1007–1019. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Hardy H, Kumar V, Doros G, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a personalized cellular phone reminder system to enhance adherence to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011;25(3):153–161. 10.1089/apc.2010.0006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Shah R, Watson J, Free C. A systematic review and meta-analysis in the effectiveness of mobile phone interventions used to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV infection. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1). 10.1186/s12889-019-6899-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Mayer JE, Fontelo P. Meta-analysis on the effect of text message reminders for HIV-related compliance. AIDS Care. 2017;29(4):409–417. 10.1080/09540121.2016.1214674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Hussen SA, Jones M, Moore S, et al. Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers: development of a resilience-building social capital intervention for young black gay and bisexual men living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2018;30(Supp 4):51–58. 10.1080/09540121.2018.1527007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Muessig KE, LeGrand S, Horvath KJ, Bauermeister JA, Hightow-Weidman LB. Recent mobile health interventions to support medication adherence among HIV-positive MSM. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2017;12(5):432–441. 10.1097/COH.0000000000000401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Horvath KJ, Oakes JM, Rosser BRS, et al. Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online peer-to-peer social support ART adherence intervention. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2031–2044. 10.1007/s10461-013-0469-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Bauermeister JA, Tingler RC, Demers M, et al. Acceptability and and preliminary efficacy of an online HIV prevention intervention for single young men who have sex with men seeking partners online: the myDEx project. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(11):3064–3077. 10.1007/s10461-019-02426-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Blackburn NA, Dong W, Threats M, et al. Building community in the hiv online intervention space: lessons from the healthmpowerment intervention. Health Educ Behav. 2021;48(5):604–614. 10.1177/10901981211003859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Bassett MT, Galea S. Reparations as a public health priority — a strategy for ending black–white health disparities. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(22):2101–2103. 10.1056/NEJMp2026170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
