Skip to main content
Open Veterinary Journal logoLink to Open Veterinary Journal
. 2024 Jun 30;14(6):1313–1329. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i6.1

Tackling salmonellosis: A comprehensive exploration of risks factors, impacts, and solutions

Siti Rani Ayuti 1,2,3, Aswin Rafif Khairullah 4, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif 5, Mirni Lamid 5,*, Sunaryo Hadi Warsito 5, Ikechukwu Benjamin Moses 6, Intan Permatasari Hermawan 7, Otto Sahat Martua Silaen 8, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari 5, Suhita Aryaloka 9, Teuku Reza Ferasyi 2,10, Abdullah Hasib 11, Mira Delima 12
PMCID: PMC11268913  PMID: 39055762

Abstract

Salmonellosis, caused by Salmonella species, is one of the most common foodborne illnesses worldwide with an estimated 93.8 million cases and about 155,00 fatalities. In both industrialized and developing nations, Salmonellosis has been reported to be one of the most prevalent foodborne zoonoses and is linked with arrays of illness syndromes such as acute and chronic enteritis, and septicaemia. The two major and most common Salmonella species implicated in both warm-blooded and cold-blooded animals are Salmonella bongori and Salmonella enterica. To date, more than 2400 S. enterica serovars which affect both humans and animals have been identified. Salmonella is further classified into serotypes based on three primary antigenic determinants: somatic (O), flagella (H), and capsular (K). The capacity of nearly all Salmonella species to infect, multiply, and survive in human host cells with the aid of their pathogenic and virulence arsenals makes them deadly and important public health pathogens. Primarily, food-producing animals such as poultry, swine, cattle, and their products have been identified as important sources of salmonellosis. Additionally, raw fruits and vegetables are among other food types that have been linked to the spread of Salmonella spp. Based on the clinical manifestation of human salmonellosis, Salmonella strains can be categorized as either non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) and typhoidal Salmonella. The detection of aseptically collected Salmonella in necropsies, environmental samples, feedstuffs, rectal swabs, and food products serves as the basis for diagnosis. In developing nations, typhoid fever due to Salmonella Typhi typically results in the death of 5%–30% of those affected. The World Health Organization (WHO) calculated that there are between 16 and 17 million typhoid cases worldwide each year, with scaring 600,000 deaths as a result. The contagiousness of a Salmonella outbreak depends on the bacterial strain, serovar, growth environment, and host susceptibility. Risk factors for Salmonella infection include a variety of foods; for example, contaminated chicken, beef, and pork. Globally, there is a growing incidence and emergence of life-threatening clinical cases, especially due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella spp, including strains exhibiting resistance to important antimicrobials such as beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and third-generation cephalosporins. In extreme cases, especially in situations involving very difficult-to-treat strains, death usually results. The severity of the infections resulting from Salmonella pathogens is dependent on the serovar type, host susceptibility, the type of bacterial strains, and growth environment. This review therefore aims to detail the nomenclature, etiology, history, pathogenesis, reservoir, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, epidemiology, transmission, risk factors, antimicrobial resistance, public health importance, economic impact, treatment, and control of salmonellosis.

Keywords: Food, Salmonella, Salmonellosis, Multidrug resistance, Public health

Introduction

The epidemic of foodborne illnesses, which causes significant costs for people, the food sector, and the economy, highlights the continued importance of food safety (Hussain and Dawson, 2013). Although, there has been some noticeable progress in food science and technology, foodborne illnesses continue to have grave public health consequences (Elbehiry et al., 2023). The chance of contracting a foodborne illness has increased significantly over the last 20 years, putting approximately 25% of the population at higher risk (Grace, 2015). One of the most common foodborne bacterial pathogens worldwide is Salmonella spp, which is thought to cause 93.8 million cases of salmonellosis annually, along with 155,000 fatalities (Galán-Relaño et al., 2023).

The most common indication of a Salmonella infection worldwide is gastroenteritis, which is followed by bacteraemia and enteric fever (Teklemariam et al., 2023). Even though the majority of instances are minor and occasionally go away on their own, life-threatening clinical diseases are frequent. This illness has the ability to kill numerous animal species as well as people and cause both acute and chronic diarrhoea (Zha et al., 2019). Salmonellosis is thought to be the most prevalent foodborne zoonosis in both industrialized and developing nations (Galán-Relaño et al., 2023). It is also linked to numerous other illness syndromes, such as septicemia, acute, and chronic enteritis (Gal-Mor et al., 2014). Salmonellosis severity varies based on the host’s age, health, and the particular strain that caused the infection (Kurtz et al., 2017).

Salmonella is a facultative anaerobe, rod-shaped, Gram-negative, flagellated bacterium that belongs to the Enterobacteriaceae family (Ong et al., 2013). Its dimensions are about 2–3 × 0.4–0.6 μm. The genus Salmonella has two species: Salmonella bongori and Salmonella enterica (Oludairo et al., 2013). Human outbreaks of salmonellosis are thought to be mostly caused by S. enterica (Teklemariam et al., 2023). More than 2400 S. enterica serovars have been identified to date and many of these serovars can infect both people and animals with disease (Fjelkner et al., 2023). It is believed that swine, poultry, and cattle are the primary sources of Salmonella (Shaji et al., 2023). This bacterial colonization occurs in the intestinal tract, skin, and feathers so it can cause clinical disease and cause significant economic losses due to infected birds and medical costs for poultry farmers (Kabir, 2010).

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in foodborne pathogens, such as Salmonella, has been associated in the recent past with an increase in the number of deaths, extended hospital stays, and increased medical costs due to treatment failure (Rafiq et al., 2022). The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella clones in humans, domestic animals, and other wildlife species has dramatically increased since these clones first appeared in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Britto et al., 2019). Globally, there is growing concerned over the rising incidence of MDR Salmonella. This includes resistance to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins, two therapeutically relevant antimicrobials (Marchello et al., 2020).

Contact with diseased animals or contaminated settings, as well as ingestion of contaminated animal goods, are common ways to contract Salmonella infections (Ehuwa et al., 2021). The most common sources of isolation for these bacteria are eggs, meat, and dairy products (Eng et al., 2015). Raw fruits and vegetables are among the other foods linked to the spread of Salmonella (Mkangara, 2023). The main way that this pathogen spreads is through the trafficking of animals and raw animal foods. One of the main ways that Salmonella can contaminate organs and carcasses is during the food animal slaughter process at slaughterhouses (Zeng et al., 2021). The public is increasingly concerned about the advent of antibiotic-resistant foodborne bacteria since they are more virulent and cause a higher death rate among sick people.

Salmonella infections continue to be a major global public health concern. The financial burden of both industrialized and developing countries is increased by the costs associated with disease prevention, surveillance, and treatment (Martin et al., 2023).

Salmonella spp. have been implicated in series of acute and chronic diarrhoea in animal species as well as human beings. Sometimes, salmonellosis might present as a minor medical condition and infected people could normally heal and get better. However, the emergence and increasing spread of MDR strains of Salmonella have become a major global health concern that requires very careful and prudent use of antimicrobials. Salmonellosis can be prevented and controlled by the food industry through the implementation of good manufacturing practices and strict adoption of the hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) principle in food production processing, packaging, and storage.

Host variables noted to determine infection/disease progression include age, underlying illness, and immunological weakness or digestive tract health. The epidemiology of foodborne illnesses, especially due to bacterial pathogens, including the MDR strains has been widely reported to cause significant economic consequences for people, the food sector, and thus, needs urgent attention and intervention. Foodborne illnesses due to MDR Salmonella spp have been linked to extended hospital stays, increased medical costs due to treatment failure, and an increase in the number of deaths. In fact, the financial burden of both developed and developing countries is increased by the costs associated with disease surveillance, prevention, and treatment. This review therefore aims to comprehensively detail the nomenclature, etiology, history, pathogenesis, reservoir, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, epidemiology, transmission, risk factors, AMR, public health importance, economic impact, treatment, and control of salmonellosis.

Nomenclature

Six subspecies of S. enterica have been identified based on biochemical traits and genomic relatedness. Subspecies in this nomenclature are denoted by Roman numerals by Kauffmann-White including S. enterica subspecies enterica (I); S. enterica subspecies salama (II); S. enterica subspecies arizonae (IIIa); S. enterica subspecies diarizonae (IIIb); S. enterica subspecies houtenae (IV); and S. enterica subspecies indica (VI) (Porwollik et al., 2004). The most common subspecies of Salmonella, S. enterica subspecies enterica (I), is primarily associated with mammals and is responsible for 99% of infections in warm-blooded animals and humans (Teklemariam et al., 2023). Conversely, the remaining five subspecies of S. enterica and S. bongori are primarily found in cold-blooded animals and the environment and are rarely detected in humans (Waldner et al., 2012).

Apart from phylogenetic subspecies categorization, there is also the Kauffman and White classification scheme (Table 1). Salmonella is further divided into serotypes according to three main antigenic determinants: capsule (K), somatic (O), and flagella (H) (Rai and Mitchell, 2020). The outer membrane of bacterial cells contains the heat-stable somatic antigen (O), which is the oligosaccharide component of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of the cells (Whitfield et al., 2020). Multiple O antigens can be expressed by a particular serotype of Salmonella. The heat-stable H antigen, which is mostly present on bacterial flagella, is involved in the host immune response’s activation (Hajam et al., 2017). The genes that code for flagella proteins are found in two distinct types of Salmonella. These bacteria have the unusual capacity to express only one protein at a time if they are diphasic (phases I and II) (McQuiston et al., 2008).

Table 1. Kauffmann-White scheme’s Salmonella.

Salmonella subspecies Number of serotypes Host
S. enterica subspecies indica (VI) 12 Cold-blooded animals
S. bongori (V) 20 Cold-blooded animals
S. enterica subspecies houtenae (IV) 70 Cold-blooded animals
S. enterica subspecies arizonae (IIIa) 94 Cold-blooded animals
S. enterica subspecies diarizonae (IIIb) 324 Cold-blooded animals
S. enterica subspecies salamae (II) 489 Cold-blooded animals
S. enterica subspecies enterica (I) 1,454 Warm-blooded animals
Total 2,463

Many serotypes express the phase I H antigens that determine immunological identification, whereas many other serotypes express the non-specific phase II antigens (Wang et al., 2020). Surface K antigen is a heat-sensitive polysaccharide that is mostly found on the surface of the bacterial capsule and is uncommon among the majority of Salmonella serotypes. Only the serotypes Dublin, Typhi, and Paratyphi C have the virulence antigen (Vi), the K antigen subtype (Zghair et al., 2022).

The term “serovar,” which is equivalent to “serotype,” has been used frequently in literature (Ferrari et al., 2019). Subspecies are typically left out when designating specific Salmonella serotypes. For instance, the enterica serotype of S. enterica subspecies Typhi is sometimes abbreviated in literary works as Salmonella ser. typhi or S. typhi. More than 2,400 serotypes have been found to date, with over 50% of these serotypes belonging to the S. enterica subspecies (Reen et al., 2005). Each serotype is distinguished by its own mix of somatic and flagellar O antigens, H1 and H2.

Etiology

A member of the Enterobacteriaceae family is Salmonella. This rod-shaped microbe (Fig. 1) is motile because it has peritrichous flagella, is a facultative anaerobe, does not make spores, and tests negative for Gram’s staining and oxidase (Andino and Hanning, 2015). Salmonella species are roughly 2–3 × 0.4–0.6 μm in size. The majority of Salmonella serovars are aerogenic, with the exception of Salmonella serovar Typhimurium, which does not produce gas (Shaji et al., 2023). Normally, Salmonella converts nitrates to nitrites, produces hydrogen sulfide, and breaks down D-glucose to create hydrogen and carbon dioxide (Mendes et al., 2021). Tests for the synthesis of urease and indole (tryptophanase) have also shown negative results for Salmonella (Cosby et al., 2015). Salmonella’s 16S rDNA gene sequence study places it in the Gamma proteobacteria class (Větrovský and Baldrian, 2013).

Fig. 1. Micrograph of Salmonella bacteria (Source: Sherris Medical Microbiology (4th edition), McGraw Hill publishers (2003)).

Fig. 1.

Salmonella cell walls are made up of proteins, lipoproteins, lipids, and LPSs (Cestero et al., 2021). The biological effects of bacteria are caused by endotoxins, which are found in LPSs and the lipid portion of the cell wall (Maldonado et al., 2016). Somatic O antigens are another name for the common central polysaccharide and monosaccharide endotoxin (Kubler-Kielb et al., 2013). The polymer moiety on the surface of bacteria, known as the somatic O antigen, is made up of many short oligosaccharides (Whitfield et al., 2020). There are about 60 somatic antigens in Salmonella (Alessiani et al., 2023). Genotype analysis demonstrates how genes are transferred between different types of bacteria to acquire antigens. The numbers correspond to these antigens. Using specific antisera, Salmonella can be categorized into multiple groups based on these somatic antigens (Robertson et al., 2018).

Salmonella possesses the flagella antigen H as well. These are denoted by numbers and letters. Approximately 114 H antigens have been identified (McQuiston et al., 2011). Heat-labile proteins make up the flagella H antigen. There are two phases to them: phases I and II of the H antigen are the terms for the specific and non-specific phases (Schreiber et al., 2015). On the surface of the K antigen, certain strains of Salmonella generate carbohydrates that are susceptible to heat (Pearson et al., 2020). Aside from that, the cell walls of Salmonella typhi are covered in capsular antigens, which confer pathogenicity (Jahan et al., 2022). In 2,000, roughly 2,463 serotypes were described based on somatic and flagellar agglutination reactions; in 2017, it was stated that the number had increased to 3,000 (Popa and Papa, 2021).

Salmonella grows readily on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar, Blood agar (BA), MacConkey Agar (MCA), Salmonella-Shigella Agar, and Bismuth Sulfate Agar (Paniel and Noguer, 2019). Mannose and glucose are fermented by the bacteria on this agar, but not lactose or sucrose (Agbankpe et al., 2019). Salmonella serotypes grow best in temperatures between 35°C and 40°C. Depending on the growth substrate and serovar involved, the bacterium can grow in a temperature range of 2°C–54°C (Keerthirathne et al., 2016). Low temperatures are insufficient for Salmonella to flourish. The robust nature of microbes means that freezing does not necessarily have a negative impact on them (Morey and Singh, 2012). The majority of Salmonella serovars can withstand drying out and thrive in acidic environments with a pH of 1–4. This bacterium can withstand heat, alcohol, and weak acids (Foley et al., 2013).

History

Early 19th-century research on Salmonella was carried out by Eberth, who identified the microorganism and Gaffky, who isolated the bacillus that causes typhoid illness in humans (Marineli et al., 2013). Following that, Salmonella was found and isolated in 1885 by Theobald Smith and Daniel Elmer Salmon from the intestines of pigs afflicted with typical swine sickness (hog cholera) (Chang et al., 2021). At the time, they believed that bacterium was the swine cholera’s causative agent. Salmonella was the eventual name given to the bacterial strain in honor of Dr. Daniel Elmer Salmon, an American pathologist who collaborated closely with Smith (Kazmi, 2022). The name of the genus Salmonella has grown more complex and contentious in recent years, and it is still up for discussion. Presently, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) suggested Salmonella nomenclature scheme is used by the majority of Salmonella reference centers worldwide, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Brenner et al., 2000). Salmonella is divided into two species under this nomenclature system according to variations in 16S rRNA sequencing analysis (Větrovský and Baldrian, 2013). These two common species are S. bongori and S. enterica.

Pathogenesis

The severity of a human Salmonella infection varies according to the patient’s health and serotype. Older people, small children, and those with compromised immune systems are more susceptible to contracting Salmonella infections than the general public (Ehuwa et al., 2021). The capacity of nearly all Salmonella strains to infect, multiply, and survive in human host cells makes them dangerous and possibly deadly (Kurtz et al., 2017).

The fact that Salmonella initiates its own phagocytosis in order to infiltrate the host cells is an intriguing aspect of its invasion of human non-phagocytic host cells (Mambu et al., 2017). The Salmonella Pathogenicity Island (SPI), a collection of genes spread throughout a substantial stretch of chromosomal DNA that code for structures crucial in the invasion process, provided the remarkable genetics underpinning this cunning tactic (Lerminiaux et al., 2020). Bacteria typically infiltrate the intestinal wall’s epithelial cells when they enter the digestive system through tainted food or water (Fàbrega and Vila, 2013). Salmonella uses the type III secretion system, a multichannel protein that is encoded by SPI, to inject its effectors into the cytoplasm and across the intestinal epithelial cell membrane (Azimi et al., 2020). Bacterial effectors then rebuild the actin cytoskeleton of the host cell, causing the epithelial cell membrane to ripple or stretch outward in order to swallow the bacteria (McGhie et al., 2009). The membrane ruffle’s morphology is similar to the phagocytosis process (Patel and Harrison, 2008).

Given that these strains of Salmonella are not virulent, their capacity to endure in host cells is essential for disease. After entering a host cell, Salmonella is contained within a membrane-bound space called a vacuole that is composed of the host cell’s membrane (Azimi et al., 2020). Normally, when foreign substances made of bacteria are present, the host cell’s defense system is triggered, which leads to lysosomal fusion and the release of digestive enzymes that break down intracellular bacteria (Chaplin, 2010). However, Salmonella uses the type III secretion system to introduce more effector proteins into the vacuole, changing the compartment’s structure (Ramos-Morales, 2012). Remodeled vacuoles prevent lysosome fusion, enabling bacterial intracellular survival and multiplication inside the host cell (Fang and Méresse, 2021). The reticuloendothelial system (RES) allows bacteria to be transferred since they can survive inside macrophages (Ellis et al., 2019).

Reservoir

Salmonella is a facultative intracellular bacterium that inhabits macrophage phagolysosomes and is immune to the bactericidal characteristics of antibodies (Singh et al., 2017). Compared to other family members, Salmonella is more resilient to various environmental conditions. These bacteria multiply in the pH range of 4–8, at 8°C–45°C, and at water activity higher than 0.94 (Kynčl et al., 2021). Additionally, these bacteria may proliferate in conditions with little to no oxygen (Harrell et al., 2021).

One of the boundaries of human knowledge and practice on farms, food processing facilities, and slaughterhouses is environmental and personal cleanliness. Conversely, food contamination is strongly correlated with the food handler’s state of health (Nkhebenyane and Lues, 2020). Foodborne illnesses are a public health concern in both industrialized and developed nations. In the food supply chain, contamination can happen at any point, including in the manufacturing, processing, distribution, and preparation stages (Chebolu-Subramaniana and Gaukler, 2015). There must be strict regulations governing personnel cleanliness on farms and in food processing enterprises.

There are difficulties associated with international trade, including its introduction through travelling abroad and the trading of food, livestock, and animal feed. Contaminated water and inanimate things are potential sources of Salmonella (Mukherjee et al., 2019). The increasing AMR to Salmonella in recent years as a result of the extensive use of antimicrobial medications in the human and animal sectors adds another layer of uncertainty to the environment around food processing (Nair et al., 2018).

Clinical manifestations

Salmonella strains can be classified as typhoidal Salmonella or non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) based on the clinical presentation of human salmonellosis. In human infections, the four distinct clinical manifestations are gastroenteritis, enteric fever, chronic carrier state, bacteremia, and other extraintestinal complications.

Gastroenteritis

There exist at least 150 serotypes of Salmonella that can cause salmonellosis or nontyphoidal enterocolitis, with the most prevalent serotypes being S. Typhimurium and S. enterica (Falay et al., 2023). Transmission is usually caused by eating or drinking water tainted with animal excrement rather than human excrement (Teklemariam et al., 2023). Due to the introduction of MDR S. Typhimurium DT104, which has been connected to outbreaks linked to beef contamination, hospitalization rates for foodborne salmonellosis have increased (Parker et al., 2021).

Children with systemic salmonellosis are treated with ceftriaxone, whereas those with severe gastroenteritis are frequently given ciprofloxacin (Bruzzese et al., 2018). Treatment is typically contraindicated in producing animals, such as pigs, chickens, and cattle, but if necessary, injections can be used together with a variety of other therapies, depending on factors like discontinuation duration (Ghimpețeanu et al., 2022). Since antibiotics might extend the presence of germs in the faeces, they are generally not advised, with the exception of rare circumstances.

Enteric fever

Salmonella typhi is the cause of typhoid fever, whereas Salmonella paratyphi A, B, and C are the cause of paratyphoid fever, which has less severe symptoms and a lower fatality rate (Xie et al., 2022). Only humans are pathogenic for both serotypes. Consumption of food or water tainted with human faeces is the usual cause of infection (Crump, 2019). Antibiotic-resistant strains have been discovered in the majority of endemic areas recently, particularly in Southeast Asia, Pakistan, India, and the Middle East (Mina et al., 2023).

About 10% of patients have a chance of dying, relapsing, or suffering from severe side effects like intestinal perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, or typhoid encephalopathy (Parry et al., 2014). The most frequent occurrence that can be brought on by lingering microbes in the RES is recurrence (Hsiao et al., 2016). There is a high death rate linked to typhoid encephalopathy, which is frequently accompanied by shock (Leung et al., 2012). Blood transfusions are not necessary for the treatment of mild gastrointestinal bleeding, although if significant blood arteries are implicated, 1%–2% of cases may result in death. Symptoms of an intestinal perforation in sick individuals may include low blood pressure, an elevated heart rate, and stomach pain. Therefore, 1%–3% of hospitalized patients have a very dangerous disease (Aamer et al., 2021).

Chronic carrier state

Chronic carriers have the ability to spread salmonellosis, which can infect a large number of people, particularly those in the food business (Foster et al., 2021). Not all of the causes of the chronic carrier condition have been identified. Salmonella of the nontyphoidal serotype often lives in the digestive system for 6 weeks to 3 months, depending on the serotype (Kurtz et al., 2017). Stool samples from nontyphoidal Salmonella patients only contain 0.1% of cases for longer than a year. A chronic carrier status is the outcome of 2%–5% of untreated typhoid infections. In both treated and untreated cases of typhoid, up to 10% will excrete Salmonella typhi for 1–3 months, and between 1%–4% will develop into chronic carriers who continue to excrete the bacteria for over a year (Gunn et al., 2014).

Bacteremia and other extraintestinal complications

Bacteremia is caused by untreated salmonellosis in about 8% of cases (Jakubowski et al., 2018). A dangerous disorder called bacteremia occurs when germs pass through the intestinal barrier and into the circulation (Christaki and Giamarellos-Bourboulis, 2014). It has been linked to extremely invasive serotypes like Dublin or Cholearaesuis (Angelo et al., 2016). If there is no apparent cause for a fever, one should consider the possibility of Salmonella-induced bacteremia. Antibiotics should be administered to patients who have bacteremia and other problems (Lee et al., 2017).

Diagnosis

The detection of aseptically collected Salmonella in necropsies, environmental samples, feedstuffs, rectal swabs, and food products serves as the basis for diagnosis (Kasturi and Drgon, 2017; Zeng et al., 2021). It can also be identified serologically in animals that have been or are presently infected with certain serovars (Holschbach and Peek, 2018). It is crucial to cultivate vaginal swabs, placentas, fetal entrails, and embryonated egg cells if the reproductive organs are infected, infertility develops, or conception happens (Adem et al., 2022). Numerous methods can be used to identify microorganisms, such as selective agar media to distinguish Salmonella from other enterobacteria, pre-enrichment to sensitize badly wounded Salmonella, and enrichment media with inhibitory chemicals to inhibit competing organisms (Park et al., 2012). Reliable verification of isolated strains can be achieved by using a range of biochemical, serological, and molecular studies on pure cultures. The antigenic formula in the Kaufman White scheme can be used to determine the serovars of these microorganisms (Ryan et al., 2017). The antigens called somatic (O), flagellar (H), and virulence (Vi) can be recognized using special typing serum (Wang et al., 2020). Sending isolates to a reference laboratory can be necessary for many laboratories in order to confirm full serologic identity, phage type, and strain genotyping.

Epidemiology

Typhoid or enteric fever cases are steady at low levels in affluent nations, whereas nontyphoidal salmonellosis cases are rising globally. In developing nations, typhoid fever typically results in the death of 5%–30% of those affected (Antillón et al., 2017). The World Health Organization (WHO) calculates that there are between 16 and 17 million typhoid cases worldwide each year, with 600,000 deaths as a result (World Health Organization, 2018). Although the death rate varies by region, it can still be as high as 5%–7% even with optimal usage of antibiotics (Kalra et al., 2003). However, non-typhoid cases totaled 1.3 billion, resulting in 3 million fatalities (Ao et al., 2015). Between 2 million and 4 million cases of Salmonella gastroenteritis and 500 fatalities are reported annually in the United States (Nadi et al., 2020). Since sporadic cases are infrequently recorded and big outbreaks are typically the focus of investigation, it is challenging to calculate more precise salmonellosis numbers. Only 1%–10% of cases of salmonellosis are reported in numerous African, Asian, and South and Central American nations (Teklemariam et al., 2023).

The disease typhoid fever is endemic in many Eastern and Southern European countries, the Middle East, Africa, Central America, Asia, and South America (Hancuh et al., 2023). Typhoid is the most frequent disease among returning tourists in the US and Europe (Muresu et al., 2020). Typhoid fever is most common in endemic areas when it first appears in school-age children and young adults, declines in middle age, and is usually quite low in the first few years of life (Pitzer et al., 2019). The majority of childhood illnesses, particularly in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta region, are identifiable despite frequently being mild (Holt et al., 2011). Typhus Mary was the most well-known outbreak of enteric disease. Between 1900 and 1907, at least 22 persons in New York City contracted typhoid fever from hired domestic cook Mary Mallon, which resulted in three fatalities. After being arrested by public health officials in 1907, she was isolated for 3 years. She was released in 1915 with the stipulation to never work as a cook again, but she disregarded that vow and went on to infect at least 25 more people with typhoid disease in a Manhattan maternity hospital. Ultimately, she lived a solitary life until his passing in 1938 (Marineli et al., 2013).

The pathogen’s level of contagiousness is determined by the serovar, growth environment, host susceptibility, and bacterial strain of Salmonella. Conversely, host variables that regulate vulnerability to infection comprise age, underlying illness, and immunological weakness or digestive tract health (Schultz et al., 2018). Salmonella can spread to infectious doses of 103–109 CFU/g (Andino and Hanning, 2015). The young, old, pregnant, and immunosuppressed (YOPI) categories are particularly vulnerable to infection from salmonellosis, with outbreaks stemming from a single food source showing that as little as 1–10 cells can cause the disease (Dietrich et al., 2023).

Transmission

Salmonella can be found in water for several days to several months, but it is also common and extremely persistent in dry settings (Wibisono et al., 2020). Salmonella enterica serovars can infect humans and animals and have a variety of hosts and reservoirs (Silva et al., 2014). Most Salmonella enterica serovars are host-adapted, which means they can infect and cause sickness in a wide range of hosts, with the exception of a small number of host-restricted serovars (Andino and Hanning, 2015). Animals that are asymptomatic but are considered “carriers” of Salmonella can develop clinical illness or subclinical infections (Usmael et al., 2022). For instance, prior research has demonstrated that subclinical infections in hens can last longer than 22 weeks (Ruvalcaba-Gómez et al., 2022). In other research indicates that carrier pigs are a significant source of contamination for the farm’s other animals, the environment, and harvest-stage carcasses (Soliani et al., 2023). These carriers are crucial to the ongoing spread of Salmonella in the environment and on farms because they can periodically and continually excrete the bacterium in their faeces without exhibiting any symptoms (Ehuwa et al., 2021). Similar to this, it has been demonstrated that pets like dogs and cats carry these germs around asymptomatically. As a result, when they periodically excrete these bacteria through their faeces, they can contaminate the environment and other animals that produce food (Dróżdż et al., 2021).

Transmission via vertical and horizontal paths are two other significant types. Vertical transmission is when germs are passed from parents to children (Liu et al., 2022). Since Enteritidis serovars have a particular affinity for the reproductive system of hens, vertical transmission is particularly relevant when it comes to Salmonella infections in poultry (Shaji et al., 2023). In this instance, the parent chicken contracts a systemic infection that results in ovarian infection and the formation of eggs in the fallopian tubes, which transmits the infection to the offspring by transovarian infection (Shah et al., 2017). Enteritidis serovars can also migrate from the cloaca to the reproductive organs in order to obtain access to eggs (Jiang et al., 2023). There is growing evidence that in dairy cows, Salmonella can also be vertically passed from mother to foetus during gestation (Hanson et al., 2016). Conversely, horizontal transmission happens via the aerogenous or feco-oral pathway (Gast et al., 2020). Salmonellosis can also be introduced into livestock through recently acquired and infected birds (Shaji et al., 2023). The disease can also spread on farms through foreign objects, tainted drinking water, unclean feed and feeders, asymptomatic carriers, and animal excrement from clinically infected animals (Mkangara, 2023).

The spread of Salmonella from one building or livestock facility to another, as well as the survival of livestock buildings and facilities, are significantly aided by pests including cockroaches, flies, and rodents (Djeffal et al., 2018). Salmonella can be carried in the intestinal tract of rodents without any signs or clinical disease, making them significant reservoirs and vectors of the bacteria (Deng et al., 2007). This bacterium can be acquired from the excrement of sick or wild animals on farms, and it is frequently linked to contamination of feed, water, and grain kept on farms (Wibisono et al., 2020). Flying insects serve as mechanical carriers that facilitate the spread of bacteria from one farm to another and from animals to people (Bertelloni et al., 2023). Animals raised on farms contract the disease by eating Salmonella-contaminated flies. Flies near chicken farms and in the surrounding environment have been found to harbour Salmonella (Holt et al., 2007). Salmonella infections are thought to be mostly spread by wild animals, including wild birds and other wildlife (Hoelzer et al., 2011). They are in charge of introducing and dispersing germs into animals through contaminated feed, water, or the surrounding environment. It has been demonstrated that human trafficking on farms raises the possibility of Salmonella infections in hens, chickens, and pigs (Teklemariam et al., 2023). A different study found a direct link between the number of tourists and the incidence of Salmonella on farms (Rodríguez-Hernández et al., 2021). The results of this investigation indicated that a rise in farm visitor numbers was linked to an increased incidence of Salmonella.

Risk factor

Risk factors for Salmonella infections include a variety of foods, for example contaminated chicken, beef and pork (Ehuwa et al., 2021). Additionally, Salmonella can be found in a variety of crops and sprouts (Cui et al., 2017). This bacterium may also be present in a number of processed foods, including pot pie and chicken nuggets (Mkangara, 2023). Eating food that has been obtained from locations other than supermarkets increases the risk of salmonellosis (Ehuwa et al., 2021). Other recognized risk factors include eating ice cream, flavoured iced drinks, consuming food from street vendors, coming into contact with patients or disease carriers, and raw fruit and vegetables that are cultivated in fields that have been fertilized with manure (Batool et al., 2022). Salmonella infection will be spread by unhygienic labour practices when handling and preparing food as well as poor waste disposal (Mkangara, 2023). The different management strategies employed, the degree of stocking, whether the animals are housed or not, and the epidemiological traits of Salmonella all affect the clinical manifestations of the disease in large animals (He et al., 2023).

The animal’s reaction to a Salmonella infection is determined by the size of the challenge dose and its immune status, which is based on its prior infections, exposure to stressors, particularly in older animals, and its colostrum consumption in newborns (Higginson et al., 2016). It is acknowledged that intensifying livestock production across all species has a major risk of raising the incidence of novel illnesses (Sargeant et al., 2021). Any significant change in the way a herd or group of animals is managed can lead to the clinical manifestation of an illness if it is already present in the animals (Cummings et al., 2009). Salmonella is sensitive to dryness and sunshine; thus, temperature and humidity are crucial (Bashir et al., 2022).

Antibiotic resistance

Salmonella strains developing antibiotic resistance is a major global health concern. Salmonella resistance to a particular antibiotic, specifically chloramphenicol, was first documented in the early 1960s (Aslam et al., 2018). Since then, many nations, including the UK, the US, and Saudi Arabia, have seen a rise in the frequency of isolating Salmonella strains that are resistant to one or more antimicrobial treatments (Montone et al., 2023). Traditional first-line therapies for Salmonella infections involve the use of antibiotics including chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Veeraraghavan et al., 2021).

A multidrug resistant (MDR) strain of Salmonella is reistant to at least 3 different classes of antibiotics. MDR phenotypic features have become more common over time in S. typhi at higher levels and S. paratyphi at lower levels. Two continents where the MDR phenotype of S. typhi isolates is prevalent are Africa and Asia (Eng et al., 2015). In a surveillance survey spanning five Asian nations, MDR isolates of S. typhi were found at higher concentrations in India, Pakistan, and Vietnam than in Indonesia and China (Ochiai et al., 2008). Similar information is shown in other published reports, which show that MDR S. typhi is more common in Pakistan, India, Nepal, and Vietnam than it is in China, Indonesia, and Laos (Effa et al., 2011).

Fluoroquinolones and broad-spectrum cephalosporins are now the recommended antimicrobial medicines for the treatment of MDR S. typhi due to the development of resistance to traditional antibiotics (Veeraraghavan et al., 2018). However, research suggests that cases of typhoidal Salmonella are becoming increasingly resistant to fluoroquinolones (Piekarska et al., 2023). S. paratyphi exhibits more fluoroquinolone resistance than S. typhi in nations with a higher prevalence of MDR isolates (Kumar et al., 2017). Isolates from Pakistan, India, and Vietnam exhibited significant incidence rates of 59%, 57%, and 44%, respectively, of nalidixic acid resistance, which is utilized as a marker of decreased sensitivity to ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones (Eng et al., 2015).

Regarding NTS, since the 1990 release of the MDR strain S. Typhimurium DT104, the number of strains exhibiting the MDR phenotype has grown in numerous nations (Boyd et al., 2002). According to statistics from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) for the years 2005–2006, 4.1% of clinical isolates in the US demonstrated decreased sensitivity to cephalosporins, and 84% of NTS isolates exhibited the MDR phenotype (Rincón-Gamboa et al., 2021). More thorough data (1996–2007) is provided by NARMS, which also reports the rise of NTS isolates resistant to ceftriaxone and nalidixic acid (Crump et al., 2011). Public health officials are concerned about this phenomenon in terms of clinical care and infection prevention. Data from a surveillance study of 135,000 NTS clinical isolates done in Europe between 2000 and 2004 revealed that 20% of isolates were nalidixic acid resistant and 15% of isolates had the MDR phenotype (Meakins et al., 2008).

Public health importance

Globalization, technological advancements in travel, and the expansion of international trade between numerous nations have recently resulted in the rapid spread of foodborne pathogens, contaminants in food, and other infections that may be dangerous to human health (Bintsis et al., 2017). Since surveillance systems are crucial economically, there is a growing awareness of the necessity to implement them in order to guarantee food safety and pinpoint the items that are linked to foodborne disease outbreaks. Furthermore, finding a single tainted food item might lead to the wastage of tons of food, which can impair international trade and cause financial losses for the producing industry (Ishangulyyev et al., 2019). One of the most often reported foodborne disease outbreaks globally is salmonellosis, which is typically prevalent in impoverished nations like Africa, India, and Asia (Popa and Papa, 2021). Due to its high endemicity, the challenge of putting control measures in place, and its notable rates of morbidity and mortality, this illness poses a hazard to public health (Galán-Relaño et al., 2023). Salmonella has been connected to outbreaks and isolated cases of foodborne illness in humans all across the world, making it one of the organisms with the biggest effects on human populations, according to the World Health Organization (WHO, 2018). Since outbreaks of salmonellosis have been linked to chicken and poultry products, including eggs, poultry is widely acknowledged as a primary source of the disease (Andino and Hanning, 2015). Humans typically contract the disease by eating food tainted with animal faeces or by cross-contaminating food with other substances (Teklemariam et al., 2023).

Typhoid strains S. typhi and S. paratyphi are the cause of enteric fever, which is prevalent in Southeast and Central Asia and is estimated to cause 200,000 fatalities and 22 million illnesses annually (Crump and Mintz, 2010). NTS serovars are common and typically linked to particular species. This bacterium typically causes self-limiting gastroenteritis in humans, which manifests as fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and cramping in the stomach (Fleckenstein et al., 2021). Prolonged faecal bacterial shedding lasting longer than a month may accompany these symptoms. The most prevalent type of NTS infection, gastroenteritis, is thought to cause 93.8 million cases and 155,000 fatalities worldwide each year (Peter et al., 2023). According to monitoring data from 2001 to 2005, S. enterica (12%) is the most commonly isolated serovar that causes NTS infections globally, followed by S. Typhimurium (4%) from clinical isolates that have been recovered (Kumar et al., 2022). Similar to this, S. enterica has been found to be the most prevalent serotype in Latin America, Asia, and Europe, where it accounts for 31%, 38%, and 87% of clinical isolates, respectively (Eng et al., 2015). Conversely, common serotypes of S. enterica and S. Typhimurium were found to be prevalent in 26% and 25% of recovered clinical isolates in Africa, respectively (Andoh et al., 2017). Salmonellosis was expected to cost US$ 2.71 billion a year for 1.4 million patients in 2010 (Andino and Hanning, 2015). Similar estimates place the annual cost of medical expenses, lost productivity, and sick leave related to a high frequency of salmonellosis in the US between US$ 1.3 and US$ 4.0 billion (Whiley and Ross, 2015).

Economic impact

The prevalent intestinal illness known as salmonellosis, which is mostly caused by tainted meat and poultry, is thought to cost nations billions of dollars annually and divert resources from development (Popa and Papa, 2021). Salmonellosis is one of the causes of significant economic losses in livestock due to clinical disease costs which include death, diagnosis and treatment of clinical cases, laboratory diagnosis costs, cleaning and disinfection costs, as well as control and prevention costs (Abdulhaleem et al., 2019). Farmers lose out on feed efficiency, decreased weight increase, and deaths from salmonellosis (Evangelopoulou et al., 2015). Human foodborne salmonellosis is a serious health issue in many nations. Furthermore, treating salmonellosis can be expensive. Financial expenses can have an impact on the entire production chain in addition to being associated with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of human diseases (Niemi et al., 2019). Even in affluent nations, animal products pose the greatest food risk associated with chicken meat, as seen by the high prevalence of salmonellosis in many developing nations, such as Zimbabwe, Brazil, India, and Egypt (El-Aziz, 2013). Salmonella enterica is spread by seemingly healthy chicken eggs into human meals (Foley et al., 2013). Animal products can become contaminated with Salmonella at several points in the food chain, such as during manufacturing, processing, distribution, retail marketing, handling, and preparation (Mkangara, 2023).

Treatment

Antibiotic resistance is spreading over the globe, thus choosing medications needs to be done carefully. Typically, salmonellosis resolves on its own and does not need special care. In cases of severe diarrhea, intravenous fluids may be necessary for rehydration (Andrews et al., 2017). Antibiotic therapy is required for systemic infections in animals and humans with septicaemia and should be based on the antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolate that is cultured (Rojas-Sánchez et al., 2023). Antibiotics are not advised for simple cases and should only be used if the infection has spread or is likely to spread from the gut to the bloodstream and other organs (Zha et al., 2019). Typically, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fluoroquinolones, and chloramphenicol have proven to be very active against Salmonella (Nair et al., 2018). The majority of the time, this bacterium is resistant to cefapirin, ampicillin, clindamycin, and erythromycin (Adzitey, 2018). The two antibiotics to which high bacterial resistance frequency was shown were tetracycline and streptomycin (Pezzella et al., 2004). Extra supportive care, such as the use of colloid, may be necessary when salmonellosis is accompanied by a severe clinical illness (Worley, 2023).

Control

Salmonellosis can be prevented and controlled by implementing the HACCP principle (Ehuwa et al., 2021). Biosafety and biosecurity need to be included into farm management procedures (Butucel et al., 2022). These actions are crucial for controlling infections. Requirements for entering the livestock industry include excellent health and procurement from reliable vendors with inspected breeding and hatching facilities (Fanissa et al., 2022). On farms, Salmonella can also spread by means of workers, vehicles, water, food, rubbish, clothing, shoes, rats, wild birds, pets, tools, and a host of other things (Ehuwa et al., 2021). Restricting the number of individuals who visit the farm, using protective gear, and donning cleaned boots are all ways to stop Salmonella from getting inside (Course et al., 2021). Additionally, employees need to understand the fundamentals of hygiene, such as cleaning their hands and feet. Regular cleaning and disinfection must be planned into the administration of the entire farm (Trampel et al., 2014). It is necessary to collect samples from the surroundings, drinking water, feeding places, walls, and floors to assess the effectiveness of disinfection on farms (Gržinić et al., 2023).

Antibiotic use can result in resistance issues and implementing hygienic measures to prevent salmonellosis is challenging. A multi-step strategy is needed to lower the occurrence of Salmonella at every stage of cultivation, hatching, raising, transportation, and processing (Obe et al., 2023). Salmonellosis can be decreased with the use of a live-attenuated recombinant DNA vaccine in conjunction with a thorough control program for animals, feed, and animal products (Sears et al., 2021). The growth of microorganisms in meat and poultry products can be controlled by keeping the cold chain at or below 10°C, especially when it comes to Salmonella during storage and transit (Cardoso et al., 2021). Complete immunity to illness is not guaranteed by vaccination. Preventing the vertical transmission of S. enterica between bird generations is an efficient method of managing Salmonella in eggs (Liu et al., 2022). The idea is a top-down strategy that involves testing and eradicating Salmonella starting at the top of the production pyramid and working its way down (Sivaramalingam et al., 2013).

Conclusion

Salmonella infections (Salmonellosis) continue to be one of the most common foodborne illnesses with significant global public health impact. Worldwide, there is an estimated 93.8 million cases and about 155,00 fatalities. Primarily, food-producing animals such as poultry and poultry products, swine, and cattle have been identified as important sources of salmonellosis. Additionally, raw fruits and vegetables are among other food types that have been linked to the spread of Salmonella spp. Antibiotic abuse/misuse can result in the development, emergence, or evolution of MDR strains. The epidemiological situation of salmonellosis, especially due to MDR bacterial pathogens has further exacerbated its treatment challenges as the emergence of MDR Salmonella strains complicates and limits treatment options. Implementing hygienic measures to prevent salmonellosis due to these MDR strains is challenging; thus, it is therefore imperative for physicians and veterinarians to carefully choose antibiotics for use to curtail the emergence of MDR strains. Additionally, the continued increasing incidence, emergence, and spread of MDR Salmonella strains has resulted in significant economic consequences for people, the food sector, and thus, needs urgent attention and intervention.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Universitas Airlangga.

Authors’ contributions

SRA, ARK, and WPL drafted the manuscript. TRF, IBM, and MD revise and edits the manuscripts. ML, SHW, MAA, and SA took part in preparing and critical checking this manuscript. IPH, AH, and OSMS edits the references. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was supported in part with the Program Penelitian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, in the fiscal year 2023, with grant number: 0536/E5/PG.02.00/2023.

Data availability

All references are open access, so data can be obtained from the online web.

References

  1. Aamer S, Ahmed S, Ahmed K, Iqbal N. Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage secondary to typhoid fever. Cureus. 2021;13(8):e17552. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdulhaleem N, Garba B, Younis H, Mahmuda A, Hamat R.A, Abd. Majid R.B, Lung L.T.T, Unyah N.Z, Sattar A, Saidu B. Current trend on the economic and public health significance of salmonellosis in Iraq. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2019;7(6):484–491. [Google Scholar]
  3. Adem J, Ame M.M, Ali A, Mokeria E. Review of the zoonotic importance of salmonellosis and associated risk factors. Vet. Med. Open J. 2022;7(2):62–69. [Google Scholar]
  4. Adzitey F. Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica isolated from cabbage and lettuce samples in Tamale metropolis of Ghana. Int. J. Food Contam. 2018;5(1):7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Agbankpe A.J, Dougnon T.V, Balarabe R, Deguenon E, Baba-Moussa L. In vitro assessment of antibacterial activity from Lactobacillus spp. strains against virulent Salmonella species isolated from slaughter animals in Benin. Vet. World. 2019;12(12):1951–1958. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1951-1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alessiani A, La Bella G, Donatiello A, Occhiochiuso G, Faleo S, Didonna A, D’Attoli L, Selicato P, Pedarra C, La Salandra G, Mancini M.E, Di Taranto P, Goffredo E. Occurrence of a new variant of Salmonella infantis lacking somatic antigen. Microorganisms. 2023;11(9):2274. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andino A, Hanning I. Salmonella enterica: survival, colonization, and virulence differences among serovars. Sci. World J. 2015;2015(1):520179. doi: 10.1155/2015/520179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andoh L.A, Ahmed S, Olsen J.E, Obiri-Danso K, Newman M.J, Opintan J.A, Barco L, Dalsgaard A. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella among humans in Ghana. Trop. Med. Health. 2017;45(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41182-017-0043-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Andrews J.R, Leung D.T, Ahmed S, Malek M.A, Ahmed D, Begum Y.A, Qadri F, Ahmed T, Faruque A.S.G, Nelson E.J. Determinants of severe dehydration from diarrheal disease at hospital presentation: evidence from 22 years of admissions in Bangladesh. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017;11(4):e0005512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Angelo K.M, Reynolds J, Karp B.E, Hoekstra R.M, Scheel C.M, Friedman C. Antimicrobial resistance among nontyphoidal Salmonella isolated from blood in the United States, 2003-2013. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;214(10):1565–1570. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Antillón M, Warren J.L, Crawford F.W, Weinberger D.M, Kürüm E, Pak G.D, Marks F, Pitzer V.E. The burden of typhoid fever in low- and middle-income countries: a meta-regression approach. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017;11(2):e0005376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ao T.T, Feasey N.A, Gordon M.A, Keddy K.H, Angulo F.J, Crump J.A. Global burden of invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease, 2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015;21(6):941–949. doi: 10.3201/eid2106.140999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad M.I, Khurshid M, Muzammil S, Rasool M.H, Nisar M.A, Alvi R.F, Aslam M.A, Qamar M.U, Salamat M.K.F, Baloch Z. Antibiotic resistance: a rundown of a global crisis. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018;11(1):1645–1658. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S173867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Azimi T, Zamirnasta M, Sani M.A, Dallal M.M.S, Nasser A. Molecular mechanisms of Salmonella effector proteins: a comprehensive review. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020;13(1):11–26. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S230604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bashir A, Lambert P.A, Stedman Y, Hilton A.C. Combined effect of temperature and relative humidity on the survival of Salmonella isolates on stainless steel coupons. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19(2):909. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Batool R, Qureshi S, Yousafzai M.T, Kazi M, Ali M, Qamar F.N. Risk factors associated with extensively drug-resistant typhoid in an outbreak setting of lyari town karachi, Pakistan. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022;106(5):1379–1383. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bertelloni F, Bresciani F, Cagnoli G, Scotti B, Lazzerini L, Marcucci M, Colombani G, Bilei S, Bossù T, De Marchis M.L, Ebani V.V. House flies (Musca domestica) from swine and poultry farms carrying antimicrobial resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella. Vet. Sci. 2023;10(2):118. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10020118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bintsis T. Foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiol. 2017;3(3):529–563. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Boyd D, Cloeckaert A, Chaslus-Dancla E, Mulvey M.R. Characterization of variant Salmonella genomic island 1 multidrug resistance regions from serovars Typhimurium DT104 and Agona. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002;46(6):1714–1722. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1714-1722.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brenner F.W, Villar R.G, Angulo F.J, Tauxe R, Swaminathan B. Salmonella nomenclature. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38(7):2465–2467. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.7.2465-2467.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Britto C.D, John J, Verghese V.P, Pollard A.J. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance of typhoidal Salmonella in India. Indian J. Med. Res. 2019;149(2):151–163. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_830_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bruzzese E, Giannattasio A, Guarino A. Antibiotic treatment of acute gastroenteritis in children. F1000Res. 2018;7(1):193. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12328.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Butucel E, Balta I, McCleery D, Morariu F, Pet I, Popescu C.A, Stef L, Corcionivoschi N. Farm biosecurity measures and interventions with an impact on bacterial biofilms. Agriculture. 2022;12(8):1251. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cardoso M.J, Nicolau A.I, Borda D, Nielsen L, Maia R.L, Møretrø T, Ferreira V, Knøchel S, Langsrud S, Teixeira P. Salmonellain eggs: from shopping toconsumption—a review providing anevidence-based analysis of risk factors. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021;20(1):1–26. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cestero J.J, Castanheira S, Pucciarelli M.G, Portillo F.G.D. A novel Salmonella periplasmic protein controlling cell wall homeostasis and virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12(1):633701. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.633701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chang K.M, Karkenny G, Koshy R. Salmonella septic arthritis and bacteremia in a patient with poorly controlled diabetes. Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20465. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chaplin D.D. Overview of the immune response. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;125(2 Suppl 2):S3–S23. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chebolu-Subramaniana V, Gaukler G.M. Product contamination in a multi-stage food supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2015;244(1):164–175. [Google Scholar]
  29. Christaki E, Giamarellos-Bourboulis E.J. The complex pathogenesis of bacteremia: from antimicrobial clearance mechanisms to the genetic background of the host. Virulence. 2014;5(1):57–65. doi: 10.4161/viru.26514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cosby D.E, Cox N.A, Harrison M.A, Wilson J.L, Buhr R.J, Fedorka-Cray P.J. Salmonella and antimicrobial resistance in broilers: a review. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2015;24(3):408–426. [Google Scholar]
  31. Course C.E, Boerlin P, Slavic D, Vaillancourt J.P, Guerin M.T. Factors associated with Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli during downtime in commercial broiler chicken barns in Ontario. Poult. Sci. 2021;100(5):101065. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Crump J.A. Progress in typhoid fever epidemiology. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019;68(Suppl 1):S4–S9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Crump J.A, Medalla F.M, Joyce K.W, Krueger A.L, Hoekstra R.M, Whichard J.M, Barzilay E.J Emerging infections program NARMS working group. Antimicrobial resistance among invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica isolates in the United States: National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 1996 to 2007. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011;55(3):1148–1154. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01333-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Crump J.A, Mintz E.D. Global trends in typhoid and paratyphoid Fever. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010;50(2):241–246. doi: 10.1086/649541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cui Y, Walcott R, Chen J. Differential attachment of Salmonella enterica and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli to Alfalfa, Fenugreek, Lettuce, and tomato seeds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;83(7):e03170–16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03170-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cummings K.J, Warnick L.D, Alexander K.A, Cripps C.J, Gröhn Y.T, McDonough P.L, Nydam D.V, Reed K.E. The incidence of salmonellosis among dairy herds in the northeastern United States. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92(8):3766–3774. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Deng S.X, Cheng A.C, Wang M.S, Cao P. Gastrointestinal tract distribution of Salmonella enteritidis in orally infected mice with a species-specific fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007;13(48):6568–6574. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i48.6568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Dietrich J, Hammerl J.A, Johne A, Kappenstein O, Loeffler C, Nöckler K, Rosner B, Spielmeyer A, Szabo I, Richter M.H. Impact of climate change on foodborne infections and intoxications. J. Health Monit. 2023;8(Suppl 3):78–92. doi: 10.25646/11403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Djeffal S, Mamache B, Elgroud R, Hireche S, Bouaziz O. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella spp. contamination in broiler chicken farms and slaughterhouses in the northeast of Algeria. Vet. World. 2018;11(8):1102–1108. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1102-1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dróżdż M, Małaszczuk M, Paluch E, Pawlak A. Zoonotic potential and prevalence of Salmonella serovars isolated from pets. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2021;11(1):1975530. doi: 10.1080/20008686.2021.1975530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Effa E.E, Lassi Z.S, Critchley J.A, Garner P, Sinclair D, Olliaro P.L, Bhutta Z.A. Fluoroquinolones for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011;2011(10):CD004530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004530.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ehuwa O, Jaiswal A.K, Jaiswal S. Salmonella, food safety and food handling practices. Foods. 2021;10(5):907. doi: 10.3390/foods10050907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. El-Aziz D.M. Detection of Salmonella typhimurium in retail chicken meat and chicken giblets. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2013;3(9):678–681. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60138-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Elbehiry A, Abalkhail A, Marzouk E, Elmanssury A.E, Almuzaini A.M, Alfheeaid H, Alshahrani M.T, Huraysh N, Ibrahem M, Alzaben F, Alanazi F, Alzaben M, Anagreyyah S.A, Bayameen A.M, Draz A, Abu-Okail A. An overview of the public health challenges in diagnosing and controlling human foodborne pathogens. Vaccines (Basel) 2023;11(4):725. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ellis M.J, Tsai C.N, Johnson J.W, French S, Elhenawy W, Porwollik S, Andrews-Polymenis H, McClelland M, Magolan J, Coombes B.K, Brown E.D. A macrophage-based screen identifies antibacterial compounds selective for intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):197. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08190-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Eng S.K, Pusparajah P, Ab Mutalib N.S, Ser H.L, Chan K.G, Lee L.H. Salmonella: a review on pathogenesis, epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Front. Life Sci. 2015;8(3):284–293. [Google Scholar]
  47. Evangelopoulou G, Kritas S, Christodoulopoulos G, Burriel A.R. The commercial impact of pig Salmonella spp. infections in border-free markets during an economic recession. Vet. World. 2015;8(3):257–272. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.257-272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fàbrega A, Vila J. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium skills to succeed in the host: virulence and regulation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013;26(2):308–341. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00066-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Falay D, Hardy L, Bonebe E, Mattheus W, Ngbonda D, Lunguya O, Jacobs J. Intestinal carriage of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella among household members of children with Salmonella bloodstream infection, Kisangani, DR. Congo. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14(1):1241961. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1241961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Fang Z, Méresse S. Endomembrane remodeling and dynamics in Salmonella infection. Microb. Cell. 2021;9(2):24–41. doi: 10.15698/mic2022.02.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Fanissa F, Effendi M.H, Tyasningsih W, Ugbo E.N. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella species from chicken meat sold at Surabaya Traditional Markets, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 2022;23(6):2823–2829. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ferrari R.G, Rosario D.K.A, Cunha-Neto A, Mano S.B, Figueiredo E.E.S, Conte-Junior C.A. Worldwide epidemiology of Salmonella serovars in animal-based foods: a meta-analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019;85(14):e00591–19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00591-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Fjelkner J, Hultén C, Jacobson M, Nörregård E, Young B. Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar choleraesuis in a swedish gilt-producing herd, a case report. Porc. Health Manag. 2023;9(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00329-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fleckenstein J.M, Kuhlmann F.M, Sheikh A. Acute bacterial gastroenteritis. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 2021;50(2):283–304. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Foley S.L, Johnson T.J, Ricke S.C, Nayak R, Danzeisen J. Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013;77(4):582–607. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Foster N, Tang Y, Berchieri A, Geng S, Jiao X, Barrow P. Revisiting persistent Salmonella infection and the carrier state: what do we know? Pathogens. 2021;10(10):1299. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gal-Mor O, Boyle E.C, Grassl G.A. Same species, different diseases: how and why typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars differ. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5(1):391. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Galán-Relaño Á, Díaz A.V, Lorenzo B.H, Gómez-Gascón L, Rodríguez Mª.Á.M, Jiménez E.C, Rodríguez F.P, Márquez R.J.A. Salmonella and Salmonellosis: an update on public health implications and control strategies. Animals (Basel) 2023;13(23):3666. doi: 10.3390/ani13233666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gast R.K, Jones D.R, Guraya R, Anderson K.E, Karcher D.M. Research note: horizontal transmission and internal organ colonization by Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella kentucky in experimentally infected laying hens in indoor cage-free housing. Poult. Sci. 2020;99(11):6071–6074. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ghimpețeanu O.M, Pogurschi E.N, Popa D.C, Dragomir N, Drăgotoiu T, Mihai O.D, Petcu C.D. Antibiotic use in livestock and residues in food-a public health threat: a review. Foods. 2022;11(10):1430. doi: 10.3390/foods11101430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Grace D. Food safety in low and middle income countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12(9):10490–10507. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120910490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gržinić G, Piotrowicz-Cieślak A, Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, Górny R.L, Ławniczek-Wałczyk A, Piechowicz L, Olkowska E, Potrykus M, Tankiewicz M, Krupka M, Siebielec G, Wolska L. Intensive poultry farming: a review of the impact on the environment and human health. Sci. Total Environ. 2023;858(Pt 3):160014. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Gunn J.S, Marshall J.M, Baker S, Dongol S, Charles R.C, Ryan E.T. Salmonella chronic carriage: epidemiology, diagnosis, and gallbladder persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(11):648–655. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hajam I.A, Dar P.A, Shahnawaz I, Jaume J.C, Lee J.H. Bacterial flagellin-a potent immunomodulatory agent. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017;49(9):e373. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hancuh M, Walldorf J, Minta A.A, Tevi-Benissan C, Christian K.A, Nedelec Y, Heitzinger K, Mikoleit M, Tiffany A, Bentsi-Enchill A.D, Breakwell L. Typhoid fever surveillance, incidence estimates, and progress toward typhoid conjugate vaccine introduction – Worldwide, 2018-2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2023;72(7):171–176. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7207a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hanson D.L, Loneragan G.H, Brown T.R, Nisbet D.J, Hume M.E, Edrington T.S. Evidence supporting vertical transmission of Salmonella in dairy cattle. Epidemiol. Infect. 2016;144(5):962–967. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815002241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Harrell J.E, Hahn M.M, D’Souza S.J, Vasicek E.M, Sandala J.L, Gunn J.S, McLachlan J.B. Salmonella biofilm formation, chronic infection, and immunity within the intestine and hepatobiliary tract. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;10(1):624622. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.624622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. He Y, Wang J, Zhang R, Chen L, Zhang H, Qi X, Chen J. Epidemiology of foodborne diseases caused by Salmonella in Zhejiang Province, China, between 2010 and 2021. Front. Public Health. 2023;11(1):1127925. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1127925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Higginson E.E, Simon R, Tennant S.M. Animal models for Salmonellosis: applications in vaccine research. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2016;23(9):746–756. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00258-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hoelzer K, Switt A.I.M, Wiedmann M. Animal contact as a source of human non-typhoidal salmonellosis. Vet. Res. 2011;42(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Holschbach C.L, Peek S.F. Salmonella in dairy cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2018;34(1):133–154. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Holt K.E, Dolecek C, Chau T.T, Duy P.T, La T.T, Hoang N.V, Nga T.V, Campbell J.I, Manh B.H, Chau N.V.V, Hien T.T, Farrar J, Dougan G, Baker S. Temporal fluctuation of multidrug resistant Salmonella typhi haplotypes in the mekong river delta region of Vietnam. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011;5(1):e929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Holt P.S, Geden C.J, Moore R.W, Gast R.K. Isolation of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis from houseflies (Musca domestica) found in rooms containing Salmonella serovar Enteritidis-challenged hens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73(19):6030–6035. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00803-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hsiao A, Toy T, Seo H.J, Marks F. Interaction between Salmonella and schistosomiasis: a review. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(12):e1005928. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hussain M.A, Dawson C.O. Economic impact of food safety outbreaks on food businesses. Foods. 2013;2(4):585–589. doi: 10.3390/foods2040585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ishangulyyev R, Kim S, Lee S.H. Understanding food loss and waste—why are we losing and wasting food? Foods. 2019;8(8):297. doi: 10.3390/foods8080297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Jahan F, Chinni S.V, Samuggam S, Reddy L.V, Solayappan M, Yin L.S. The complex mechanism of the Salmonella typhi biofilm formation that facilitates pathogenicity: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(12):6462. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Jakubowski R, Steed L.L, Dorman S.E, Marculescu C. A case of malaria predisposing to Salmonella bacteremia in a returning traveler from Nigeria. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2018;2018(1):8463417. doi: 10.1155/2018/8463417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Jiang X, Zhang X, Sun Y, Sun Z, Li X, Liu L. Effects of Salmonella Enteritidis infection on TLRs gene expression and microbial diversity in cecum of laying hens. Heliyon. 2023;9(6):e16414. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Kabir S.M.L. Avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis: a closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control and public health concerns. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2010;7(1):89–114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7010089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Kalra S.P, Naithani N, Mehta S.R, Swamy A.J. Current trends in the management of typhoid Fever. Med. J. Armed. Forces India. 2003;59(2):130–135. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(03)80060-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Kasturi K.N, Drgon T. Real-time PCR method for detection of Salmonella spp. in environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;83(14):e00644–17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00644-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kazmi S.Y. The etymology of microbial nomenclature and the diseases these cause in a historical perspective. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022;29(11):103454. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Keerthirathne T.P, Ross K, Fallowfield H, Whiley H. A review of temperature, pH, and other factors that influence the survival of Salmonella in mayonnaise and other raw egg products. Pathogens. 2016;5(4):63. doi: 10.3390/pathogens5040063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Kubler-Kielb J, Vinogradov E, Ng W.I, Maczynska B, Junka A, Bartoszewicz M, Zelazny A, Bennett J, Schneerson R. The capsular polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide structures of two carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak isolates. Carbohydr. Res. 2013;369(1):6–9. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2012.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Kumar S, Kumar Y, Kumar G, Kumar G, Tahlan A.K. Non-typhoidal Salmonella infections across India: emergence of a neglected group of enteric pathogens. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2022;17(5):747–754. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kumar Y, Sharma A, Mani K.R. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance markers & their stability in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Indian J. Med. Res. 2017;146(Suppl):S9–S14. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_979_15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kurtz J.R, Goggins J.A, McLachlan J.B. Salmonella infection: interplay between the bacteria and host immune system. Immunol. Lett. 2017;190(1):42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kynčl J, Špačková M, Fialová A, Kyselý J, Malý M. Influence of air temperature and implemented veterinary measures on the incidence of human salmonellosis in the Czech Republic during 1998–2017. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10122-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Lee C.C, Lee C.H, Hong M.Y, Tang H.J, Ko W.C. Timing of appropriate empirical antimicrobial administration and outcome of adults with community-onset bacteremia. Crit. Care. 2017;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1696-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Lerminiaux N.A, MacKenzie K.D, Cameron A.D.S. Salmonella pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI-1): the evolution and stabilization of a core genomic type three secretion system. Microorganisms. 2020;8(4):576. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Leung D.T, Bogetz J, Itoh M, Ganapathi L, Pietroni M.A, Ryan E.T, Chisti M.J. Factors associated with encephalopathy in patients with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi bacteremia presenting to a diarrheal hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2012;86(4):698–702. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Liu B, Zhang X, Ding X, Bin P, Zhu G. The vertical transmission of Salmonella Enteritidis in a one-health context. One Health. 2022;16(1):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Maldonado R.F, Sá-Correia I, Valvano M.A. Lipopolysaccharide modification in gram-negative bacteria during chronic infection. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016;40(4):480–493. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Mambu J, Virlogeux-Payant I, Holbert S, Grépinet O, Velge P, Wiedemann A. An updated view on the Rck invasin of Salmonella: still much to discover. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7(1):500. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Marchello C.S, Carr S.D, Crump J.A. A systematic review on antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella Typhi Worldwide. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020;103(6):2518–2527. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Marineli F, Tsoucalas G, Karamanou M, Androutsos G. Mary Mallon (1869-1938) and the history of typhoid fever. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2013;26(2):132–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Martin L.B, Khanam F, Qadri F, Khalil I, Sikorski M.J, Baker S. Vaccine value profile for Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A. Vaccine. 2023;41(Suppl 2):S114–S133. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. McGhie E.J, Brawn L.C, Hume P.J, Humphreys D, Koronakis V. Salmonella takes control: effector-driven manipulation of the host. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009;12(1):117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. McQuiston J.R, Herrera-Leon S, Wertheim B.C, Doyle J, Fields P.I, Tauxe R.V, Logsdon J.M., Jr Molecular phylogeny of the Salmonellae: relationships among Salmonella species and subspecies determined from four housekeeping genes and evidence of lateral gene transfer events. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190(21):7060–7067. doi: 10.1128/JB.01552-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. McQuiston J.R, Waters R.J, Dinsmore B.A, Mikoleit M.L, Fields P.I. Molecular determination of H antigens of Salmonella by use of a microsphere-based liquid array. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011;49(2):565–573. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01323-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Meakins S, Fisher I.S, Berghold C, Gerner-Smidt P, Tschäpe H, Cormican M, Luzzi I, Schneider F, Wannett W, Coia J, Echeita A, Threlfall E.J Enter-net participants. Antimicrobial drug resistance in human nontyphoidal Salmonella isolates in Europe 2000-2004: a report from the Enter-net International surveillance network. Microb. Drug Resist. 2008;14(1):31–35. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2008.0777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Mendes S.S, Miranda V, Saraiva L.M. Hydrogen sulfide and carbon monoxide tolerance in bacteria. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021;10(5):729. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Mina S.A, Hasan M.Z, Hossain A.K.M.Z, Barua A, Mirjada M.R, Chowdhury A.M.M.A. The prevalence of multi-drug resistant Salmonella typhi isolated from blood sample. Microbiol. Insights. 2023;16(1):11786361221150760. doi: 10.1177/11786361221150760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Mkangara M. Prevention and control of human Salmonella enterica infections: an implication in food safety. Int. J. Food Sci. 2023;2023(1):8899596. doi: 10.1155/2023/8899596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Montone A.M.I, Cutarelli A, Peruzy M.F, La Tela I, Brunetti R, Pirofalo M.G, Folliero V, Balestrieri A, Murru N, Capuano F. Antimicrobial resistance and genomic characterization of Salmonella infantis from different sources. Int. J. Mol. Sciences. 2023;24(6):5492. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Morey A, Singh M. Low-temperature survival of Salmonella spp. in a model food system with natural microflora. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2012;9(3):218–223. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2011.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Mukherjee N, Nolan V.G, Dunn J.R, Banerjee P. Sources of human infection by Salmonella enterica serotype Javiana: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Muresu N, Sotgiu G, Are B.M, Cossu A, Cocuzza C, Martinelli M, Babudieri S, Are R, Dettori M, Azara A, Saderi L, Piana A. Travel-related typhoid fever: narrative review of the scientific literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(2):615. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Nadi Z.R, Salehi T.Z, Tamai I.A, Foroushani A.R, Sillanpaa M, Dallal M.M.S. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance and prevalence of common Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from foodborne outbreaks. Microchem. J. 2020;155(1):104660. [Google Scholar]
  111. Nair D.V.T, Venkitanarayanan K, Johny A.K. Antibiotic-resistant Salmonella in the food supply and the potential role of antibiotic alternatives for control. Foods. 2018;7(10):167. doi: 10.3390/foods7100167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Niemi J.K, Heinola K, Simola M, Tuominen P. Salmonella control programme of pig feeds is financially beneficial in finland. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6(1):200. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Nkhebenyane J.S, Lues R. The knowledge, attitude, and practices of food handlers in central South African hospices. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020;8(6):2598–2607. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Obe T, Boltz T, Kogut M, Ricke S.C, Brooks L.A, Macklin K, Peterson A. Controlling Salmonella: strategies for feed, the farm, and the processing plant. Poult. Sci. 2023;102(12):103086. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Ochiai R.L, Acosta C.J, Danovaro-Holliday M.C, Baiqing D, Bhattacharya S.K, Agtini M.D, Bhutta Z.A, Canh D.G, Ali M, Shin S, Wain J, Page A.L, Albert M.J, Farrar J, Abu-Elyazeed R, Pang T, Galindo C.M, von Seidlein L, Clemens J.D Domi Typhoid study group. A study of typhoid fever in five Asian countries: disease burden and implications for controls. Bull. World Health Organ. 2008;86(4):260–268. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.039818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Oludairo O.O, Kwaga J.K.P, Dzikwi A.A, Kabir J. The genus Salmonella, isolation and occurrence in wildlife. Int. J. Microbiol. Immun. Res. 2013;1(5):047–052. [Google Scholar]
  117. Ong S.Y, Pratap C.B, Wan X, Hou S, Rahman A.Y, Saito J.A, Nath G, Alam M. The genomic blueprint of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhi P-stx-12. Stand. Genomic Sci. 2013;7(3):483–496. doi: 10.4056/sigs.3286690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Paniel N, Noguer T. Detection of Salmonella in food matrices, from conventional methods to recent aptamer-sensing technologies. Foods. 2019;8(9):371. doi: 10.3390/foods8090371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Park S.H, Ryu S, Kang D.H. Development of an improved selective and differential medium for isolation of Salmonella spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012;50(10):3222–3226. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01228-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Parker C.T, Huynh S, Alexander A, Oliver A.S, Cooper K.K. Genomic characterization of Salmonella typhimurium DT104 strains associated with cattle and beef products. Pathogens. 2021;10(5):529. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10050529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Parry C.M, Thompson C, Vinh H, Chinh N.T, Phuong L.T, Ho V.A, Hien T.T, Wain J, Farrar J.J, Baker S. Risk factors for the development of severe typhoid fever in Vietnam. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014;14(1):73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Patel P.C, Harrison R.E. Membrane ruffles capture C3bi-opsonized particles in activated macrophages. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19(11):4628–4639. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Pearson C.R, Tindall S.N, Herman R, Jenkins H.T, Bateman A, Thomas G.H, Potts J.R, Van der Woude M.W. Acetylation of surface carbohydrates in bacterial pathogens requires coordinated action of a two-domain membrane-bound acyltransferase. mBio. 2020;11(4):e01364–20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01364-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Peter S.K, Mutiso J.M, Ngetich M, Mbae C, Kariuki S. Seroprevalence of non-typhoidal Salmonella disease and associated factors in children in Mukuru settlement in Nairobi County, Kenya. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0288015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Pezzella C, Ricci A, DiGiannatale E, Luzzi I, Carattoli A. Tetracycline and streptomycin resistance genes, transposons, and plasmids in Salmonella enterica isolates from animals in Italy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48(3):903–908. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.903-908.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Piekarska K, Wołkowicz T, Zacharczuk K, Stepuch A, Gierczyński R. The mechanisms involved in the fluoroquinolone resistance of Salmonella enterica strains isolated from humans in Poland, 2018-2019: The prediction of antimicrobial genes by in silico whole-genome sequencing. Pathogens. 2023;12(2):193. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12020193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Pitzer V.E, Meiring J, Martineau F.P, Watson C.H, Kang G, Basnyat B, Baker S. The invisible burden: diagnosing and combatting typhoid fever in Asia and Africa. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019;69(Suppl 5):S395–S401. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Popa G.L, Papa M.I. Salmonella spp. infection – a continuous threat worldwide. Germs. 2021;11(1):88–96. doi: 10.18683/germs.2021.1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Porwollik S, Boyd E.F, Choy C, Cheng P, Florea L, Proctor E, McClelland M. Characterization of Salmonella enterica subspecies I genovars by use of microarrays. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186(17):5883–5898. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.17.5883-5898.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Rafiq K, Islam M.R, Siddiky N.A, Samad M.A, Chowdhury S, Hossain K.M.M, Rume F.I, Hossain M.K, Mahbub-E-Elahi A, Ali M.Z, Rahman M, Amin M.R, Masuduzzaman M, Ahmed S, Rumi N.A, Hossain M.T. Antimicrobial resistance profile of common foodborne pathogens recovered from livestock and poultry in Bangladesh. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022;11(11):1551. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Rai A.K, Mitchell A.M. Enterobacterial common antigen: synthesis and function of an enigmatic molecule. mBio. 2020;11(4):e01914–20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01914-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Ramos-Morales F. Impact of Salmonella enterica Type III secretion system effectors on the eukaryotic host cell. Int. Sch. Res. Notices. 2012;2012(1):787934. [Google Scholar]
  133. Reen F.J, Boyd E.F, Porwollik S, Murphy B.P, Gilroy D, Fanning S, McClelland M. Genomic comparisons of Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin, Agona, and Typhimurium strains recently isolated from milk filters and bovine samples from Ireland, using a Salmonella microarray. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71(3):1616–1625. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1616-1625.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Rincón-Gamboa S.M, Poutou-Piñales R.A, Carrascal-Camacho A.K. Antimicrobial resistance of non-typhoid Salmonella in meat and meat products. Foods. 2021;10(8):1731. doi: 10.3390/foods10081731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Robertson J, Yoshida C, Gurnik S, McGrogan M, Davis K, Arya G, Murphy S.A, Nichani A, Nash J.H.E. An improved DNA array-based classification method for the identification of Salmonella serotypes shows high concordance between traditional and genotypic testing. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0207550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Rodríguez-Hernández R, Bernal J.F, Cifuentes J.F, Fandiño L.C, Herrera-Sánchez M.P, Rondón-Barragán I, Garcia N.V. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Salmonella isolated from broiler farms at the tolima region-colombia. Animals (Basel) 2021;11(4):970. doi: 10.3390/ani11040970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Rojas-Sánchez E, Jiménez-Soto M, Barquero-Calvo E, Duarte-Martínez F, Mollenkopf D.F, Wittum T.E, Muñoz-Vargas L. Prevalence estimation, antimicrobial susceptibility, and serotyping of Salmonella enterica recovered from new world non-human primates (Platyrrhini), feed, and environmental surfaces from wildlife Centers in Costa Rica. Antibiotics. 2023;12(5):844. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Ruvalcaba-Gómez J.M, Villagrán Z, Valdez-Alarcón J.J, Martínez-Núñez M, Gomez-Godínez L.J, Ruesga-Gutiérrez E, Anaya-Esparza L.M, Arteaga-Garibay R.I, Villarruel-López A. Non-antibiotics strategies to control Salmonella infection in poultry. Animals (Basel) 2022;12(1):102. doi: 10.3390/ani12010102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Ryan M.P, O’Dwyer J, Adley C.C. Evaluation of the complex nomenclature of the clinically and veterinary ignificant pathogen Salmonella. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017;2017(1):3782182. doi: 10.1155/2017/3782182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Sargeant J.M, Totton S.C, Plishka M, Vriezen E.R. Salmonella in animal feeds: a scoping review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8(1):727495. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.727495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Schreiber F, Kay S, Frankel G, Clare S, Goulding D, van de Vosse E, van Dissel J.T, Strugnell R, Thwaites G, Kingsley R.A, Dougan G, Baker S. The Hd, Hj, and Hz66 flagella variants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi modify host responses and cellular interactions. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):7947. doi: 10.1038/srep07947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Schultz B.M, Salazar G.A, Paduro C.A, Pardo-Roa C, Pizarro D.P, Salazar-Echegarai F.J, Torres J, Riedel C.A, Kalergis A.M, Álvarez-Lobos M.M, Bueno S.M. Persistent Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection increases the susceptibility of mice to develop intestinal inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2018;9(1):1166. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Sears K.T, Galen J.E, Tennant S.M. Advances in the development of Salmonella-based vaccine strategies for protection against Salmonellosis in humans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021;131(6):2640–2658. doi: 10.1111/jam.15055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Shah D.H, Elder J.R, Chiok K.L, Paul N.C. Genetic basis of Salmonella Enteritidis pathogenesis in chickens. Producing Safe Eggs. 2017;2017(1):187–208. [Google Scholar]
  145. Shaji S, Selvaraj R.K, Shanmugasundaram R. Salmonella infection in poultry: a review on the pathogen and control strategies. Microorganisms. 2023;11(11):2814. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Silva C, Calva E, Maloy S. One health and food-borne disease: Salmonella transmission between humans, animals, and plants. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014;2(1):OH-0020–2013. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.OH-0020-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Singh V, Finke-Isami J, Hopper-Chidlaw A.C, Schwerk P, Thompson A, Tedin K. Salmonella Co-opts host cell chaperone-mediated autophagy for intracellular growth. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292(5):1847–1864. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.759456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Sivaramalingam T, McEwen S.A, Pearl D.L, Ojkic D, Guerin M.T. A temporal study of Salmonella serovars from environmental samples from poultry breeder flocks in Ontario between 1998 and 2008. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2013;77(1):1–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Soliani L, Rugna G, Prosperi A, Chiapponi C, Luppi A. Salmonella infection in pigs: disease, prevalence, and a link between swine and human health. Pathogens. 2023;12(10):1267. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12101267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Teklemariam A.D, Al-Hindi R.R, Albiheyri R.S, Alharbi M.G, Alghamdi M.A, Filimban A.A.R, Al Mutiri A.S, Al-Alyani A.M, Alseghayer M.S, Almaneea A.M, Albar A.H, Khormi M.A, Bhunia A.K. Human Salmonellosis: a continuous global threat in the farm-to-fork food safety continuum. Foods. 2023;12(9):1756. doi: 10.3390/foods12091756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Trampel D.W, Holder T.G, Gast R.K. Integrated farm management to prevent Salmonella Enteritidis contamination of eggs. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2014;23(2):353–365. [Google Scholar]
  152. Usmael B, Abraha B, Alemu S, Mummed B, Hiko A, Abdurehman A. Isolation, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and risk factors assessment of non-typhoidal Salmonella from apparently healthy and diarrheic dogs. BMC Vet. Res. 2022;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-03135-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Veeraraghavan B, Pragasam A.K, Bakthavatchalam Y.D, Ralph R. Typhoid fever: issues in laboratory detection, treatment options & concerns in management in developing countries. Future Sci. OA. 2018;4(6):FSO312. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Veeraraghavan B, Pragasam A.K, Ray P, Kapil A, Nagaraj S, Perumal S.P.B, Saigal K, Thomas M, Gupta M, Rongsen-Chandola T, Jinka D.R, Shastri J, Alexander A.P, Koshy R.M, De A, Singh A, Ebenezer S.E, Dutta S, Bavdekar A, More D, Sanghavi S, Nayakanti R.R, Jacob J.J, Amladi A, Anandan S, Abirami B.S, Bakthavatchalam Y.D, Sethuvel D.P.M, John J, Kang G. Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility profile in Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi a: presenting the current scenario in India and strategy for future management. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;224(Suppl 5):S502–S516. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Větrovský T, Baldrian P. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Waldner L.L, MacKenzie K.D, Köster W, White A.P. From exit to entry: long-term survival and transmission of Salmonella. Pathogens. 2012;1(2):128–155. doi: 10.3390/pathogens1020128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Wang M, Qazi I.H, Wang L, Zhou G, Han H. Salmonella virulence and immune escape. Microorganisms. 2020;8(3):407. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Whiley H, Ross K. Salmonella and eggs: from production to plate. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12(3):2543–2556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120302543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Whitfield C, Williams D.M, Kelly S.D. Lipopolysaccharide O-antigens-bacterial glycans made to measure. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295(31):10593–10609. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.009402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Wibisono F.M, Wibisono F.J, Effendi M.H, Plumeriastuti H, Hidayatullah A.R, Hartadi E.B, Sofiana E.D. A review of salmonellosis on poultry farms: Public health importance. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020;11(9):481–486. [Google Scholar]
  161. World Health Organization. Typhoid and other invasive salmonellosis. WHO Vaccine-Preventable Diseases Surveillance Standard. 2018:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  162. Worley M.J. Salmonella bloodstream infections. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023;8(11):487. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8110487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Xie L, Ming L, Ding M, Deng L, Liu M, Cong Y. Paratyphoid fever a: infection and prevention. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13(1):945235. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.945235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Zeng H, Rasschaert G, De Zutter L, Mattheus W, De Reu K. Identification of the source for Salmonella contamination of carcasses in a large pig slaughterhouse. Pathogens. 2021;10(1):77. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10010077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Zghair L.S, Motaweq Z.Y, Lafta H.C. Phenotypically and genotypically estimation of virulence factors in Salmonella serovar typhi isolated from patients with enteric fever in Al-Najaf, Iraq. Nusantara Biosci. 2022;14(1):128–133. [Google Scholar]
  166. Zha L, Garrett S, Sun J. Salmonella infection in chronic inflammation and gastrointestinal cancer. Diseases. 2019;7(1):28. doi: 10.3390/diseases7010028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All references are open access, so data can be obtained from the online web.


Articles from Open Veterinary Journal are provided here courtesy of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli

RESOURCES