Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Feb 12;14:3487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53621-z

Magnetodynamic properties of ultrathin films of Fe3Sn2-a topological kagome ferromagnet

Kacho Imtiyaz Ali Khan 1, Akash Kumar 2,3,4, Pankhuri Gupta 1, Ram Singh Yadav 1, Johan Åkerman 2,3,4,, Pranaba Kishor Muduli 1,
PMCID: PMC11269729  PMID: 38347066

Abstract

Fe3Sn2 is a topological kagome ferromagnet that possesses numerous Weyl points close to the Fermi energy, which can manifest various unique transport phenomena such as chiral anomaly, anomalous Hall effect, and giant magnetoresistance. However, the magnetodynamic properties of Fe3Sn2 have not yet been explored. Here, we report, for the first time, the measurements of the intrinsic Gilbert damping constant (αint), and the effective spin mixing conductance (geff) of Pt/Fe3Sn2 bilayers for Fe3Sn2 thicknesses down to 2 nm, for which αint is (3.8±0.2)×10-2, and geff is (11.7±0.6)nm-2. The films have a high saturation magnetization, MS=620emucm-3, and large anomalous Hall coefficient, RS=4.6×10-10ΩcmG-1. The large values of geff, together with the topological properties of Fe3Sn2, make Fe3Sn2/Pt bilayers useful heterostructures for the study of topological spintronic devices.

Subject terms: Magnetic properties and materials, Electronic properties and materials, Spintronics

Introduction

The existence of strong electronic correlations, band topology, spin-orbit coupling, and magnetism in topological quantum materials holds great promise for future memory applications17. Weyl semimetals belong to a class of topological materials distinguished by the absence of either the crystal’s inversion symmetry or the time-reversal symmetry8. In Weyl semimetals, the opposite chirality of Weyl nodes can result in a non-trivial Berry phase912, which can influence the magneto-transport properties such as the anomalous Hall effect (AHE)1318 and the anomalous Nernst effect (ANE)1921. Recently, the kagome ferromagnet Fe3Sn2, belonging to the FemSnn-family (m : n = 1:1, 3:2, 5:3), has emerged as a novel topological quantum material for spintronic devices, thanks to its rich non-trivial magnetic and topological properties2224. Fe3Sn2, with a high Curie temperature TC=657 K25, which makes its Weyl nodes stable at room temperature26, has significant potential for applications in spintronics27, magnetic sensors28, and other areas of advanced electronics29,30. Fe3Sn2 possesses several other promising features, such as a large AHE17. It is also predicted that Fe3Sn2 can exhibit a fractional quantum Hall effect even at room temperature31. At temperature (250 K), the Fe3Sn2 shows the transition of spin re-orientation from the c-axis to the ab-plane25,32,33. Another interesting feature of Fe3Sn2 is the presence of a dispersionless flat band (0.2 eV below fermi level), and it is formed due to the destructive interference of the electron wavefunctions34. Furthermore, both numerical and experimental studies show the formation of magnetic skyrmions in Fe3Sn2, which is stabilized without requiring Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction30.

As shown in Fig. 1a, the Fe3Sn2 crystal structure consists of the repeated stacking of two Fe3Sn kagome lattices and one Sn2 stanene lattice. In our previous study35, we investigated the impact of platinum (Pt) seed layer on the polycrystalline growth of ferromagnetic Fe3Sn2 thin films on complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS)-compatible Si-based substrates, which are extremely useful for low-dissipation devices for industrial applications36,37. Furthermore, Lyalin et al. showed efficient spin-orbit torque effects in an epitaxial Fe3Sn2(0001)/Pt(111) bilayer system27 deposited using molecular beam epitaxy. However, the sputtered growth of ultrathin Fe3Sn2 films (<10 nm) and the characterization of their magneto-transport and magneto-dynamic properties have not yet been investigated, which is essential for the generation of pure spin current in such quantum material-based magnetic heterostructures.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic of the unit cell of ferromagnet Fe3Sn2, where grey and green symbols denoting the tin (Sn) and iron (Fe) atoms, respectively. (b) Glancing incidence (GI) X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were obtained for the various thicknesses (tFe3Sn2) of polycrystalline Fe3Sn2. The inset represents the schematic of Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2/AlOx thin film stack. (c) Atomic force microscopy surface morphology of 2 nm-thick-Fe3Sn2 for a scan area of 5μm×5μm.

In this work, we demonstrate sputter growth of high-quality polycrystalline Fe3Sn2 ultrathin films with very low interfacial/surface roughness (<0.6 nm), using a Ta/Pt seed layer on Si/SiO2 substrates. Through magnetization and transport measurements, we show a large saturation magnetization, MS=620emucm-3, and a large anomalous Hall coefficient, RS=4.6×10-10ΩcmG-1. Using broadband ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements, we, for the first time, also extract the intrinsic Gilbert damping constant (αint), and the effective spin mixing conductance (geff), for Fe3Sn2 thickness down to 2 nm, finding values of αint=(3.8±0.2)×10-2, and geff=(11.7±0.6)nm-2. The large values of geff make Pt an excellent spin current source for using Fe3Sn2 thin films in topological materials-based spintronic applications.

Results and discussion

Structural analysis

The inset of Fig. 1b shows a schematic of the Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(tnm)/AlOx thin film stack. First, a 1.5 nm-thin Ta seed layer was used to increase the adhesion between the Pt and the Si-SiO2 substrate. The 5 nm-thick Pt seed layer was used both to promote the growth of the ferromagnetic phase of Fe3Sn227,35 and to act as a spin sink and future source of spin currents, which will be discussed later. Fig. 1b shows the grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD) measurements performed for Si-SiO2/Ta(1.5 nm)/Pt(5 nm)/Fe3Sn2(tnm)/AlOx(3 nm) with an incidence angle 1 to characterize the structural properties. We observed a strong Bragg peak at 2θ=40.6, corresponding to the (002)-reflection of Fe3Sn2 for all thicknesses, indicating the formation of a [002]-oriented polycrystalline Fe3Sn2 ferromagnetic phase28,35. The thickness, density, and roughness of these Fe3Sn2 thin films were obtained by fitting X-ray reflectivity (XRR) measurements [supplementary, Fig. S1d] with the recursive theory of Parratt38. We found average interfacial roughness (<0.6 nm) for all the films, which indicates a smooth interface between each layer. AFM measurements also confirmed these roughness numbers. Figure 1c shows a 5μm×5μm AFM image of a 2 nm thick Fe3Sn2 film, yielding a root mean square roughness (Rrms) of about 0.3 nm, indicating a very smooth surface quality. The AFM Rrms is b e l o w 0.6 nm for all other thicknesses. The thickness dependence of surface/interfacial roughness in these films is plotted in supplementary Fig. S1 and summarized in Table S1.

It is noteworthy that the measured roughness is substantially lower than the best literature values of about 0.8 nm39. The interfacial roughness plays a crucial role in the transfer of spin current in ferromagnet/heavy metal (FM/HM) heterostructures, where a large interfacial roughness or disorder can reduce the spin current via spin memory loss40,41. Therefore, high-quality ultra-thin films with low roughness are highly desirable.

Magnetization and transport measurements

Figure 2a shows the magnetization (M) versus the in-plane external magnetic field (H) for a 5 nm Fe3Sn2 film. The high MS = 620 emu/cm3 and low Hc< 20 Oe confirm a soft ferromagnetic nature of the polycrystalline Fe3Sn2 films. The MS is comparable to that reported for epitaxial Fe3Sn2 films21,39 and bulk single crystals16.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) In-plane magnetic hysteresis measurements (M-H) for 5 nm ultra-thin Fe3Sn2 film, inset represents the corresponding zoom scan. (b) The transverse Hall resistivity (ρxy) versus magnetic field for 5 nm ultra-thin Fe3Sn2 film when the external field is swept perpendicular to the film plane. The data in the inset with the open symbols indicates the measured ρxy, which includes the resistivity contribution from the seed layer, while the data in the main panel with the closed symbol indicates the ρxyFe3Sn2 after correction for the resistivity of the seed layer in the Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2/AlOx film stack. The black dashed arrow indicates the anomalous Hall resistivity (ρxyFe3Sn2) for only Fe3Sn2. (c) The variation of longitudinal resistivity ρxx for 5 nm ultra-thin Fe3Sn2 film when the external field is applied perpendicular to the film plane, inset represents the magnetoresistance (MR) calculated using Δρxx/ρxx(0). All measurements are performed at room temperature.

In contrast to our earlier work on thicker Fe3Sn2 films35, additional care must be taken when extracting the longitudinal (ρxx) and transverse (ρxy) resistivities as the current distribution through the Ta/Pt seed layer must be considered. The total longitudinal resistivity of the entire film stack is found to be 113μΩcm. We also measured ρxxSL of only the seed layer Ta/Pt, in control samples without Fe3Sn2, and found it to be 83μΩcm, which corresponds to the longitudinal conductivity, σxxSL1.2×104Ω-1cm-1. Using the parallel resistance model, the value ρxxFe3Sn2 for only the Fe3Sn2 layer can be obtained using the following expression21:

ρxxFe3Sn2=ρxxSLρxxtFe3Sn2(t·ρxxSL)-(tSL·ρxx), 1

Here, tFe3Sn2, tSL and t represent the thickness of the Fe3Sn2 layer, seed (Ta/Pt) layer, and Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2 layer, respectively. Using Eq. (1), ρxxFe3Sn2 is found to be 211μΩcm , which is comparable to that of epitaxial thin films (202μΩcm)21 and slightly higher than the bulk value of single crystals (190μΩcm)16.

In Fig. 2b and c, room temperature Hall and longitudinal measurements were performed using a direct current (I=5 mA) flowing parallel to the film plane while sweeping the external magnetic field (H=±40 kOe) perpendicular to the film plane. To avoid voltage probe misalignment, we use the formulae ρxx (H) = [ρxx (+H) +ρxx (-H)]/2 and ρxy (H) = [ρxy (+H) -ρxy (-H)]/2, to extract the longitudinal resistivity (ρxx) and Hall resistivity (ρxy), respectively. To determine the ρxy, we use ρxy=ρOHE+ρAHE, where the first term represents the ordinary Hall resistivity (ρOHE=R0H), and the second term represents the anomalous Hall resistivity (ρAHE=RS4πMeff). R0 and RS represent the coefficients of ordinary and anomalous Hall resistivity, respectively42. R0 is found to be 8.38×10-12Ωcm/G, from which we determine the value of the charge carrier density n= 0.74×1022cm-3 at 300 K in Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(5 nm)/AlOx. The positive sign of R0 indicates that hole-like charge carriers dominate in Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(5 nm)/AlOx films, which is in agreement with previous reports39. Furthermore, we determine the carrier mobility μ=R0/ρxxFe3Sn2= 39.7cm2/V·s at 300 K, which is two orders of magnitude larger than earlier reported values [0.08cm2/V·s for Fe3Sn2(10 nm)]39. The large μ might be due to the low effective mass of the hole carriers in the Fe3Sn2(5 nm) film, similar to the reported mobility for Weyl semimetal NbP (160cm2/V·s at 300 K)43. In the inset of Fig. 2b, the measured transverse resistivity ρxy of the complete film stack Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(5 nm)/AlOx is shown. Using a linear fit (black line) to ρxy in the saturation region (10kOe<H<40kOe), and extrapolating to the y-axis, ρAHE for the Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(5nm)/AlOx films stack is found to be 0.5μΩcm. To determine the value of ρxyFe3Sn2 for the Fe3Sn2 layer from the measured data for the complete film stack of Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2/AlOx, we use the expression21:

ρxyFe3Sn2=ρxy×ρxxFe3Sn2ρxx1+ρxxFe3Sn2×tSLρxxSL×tFe3Sn2. 2

As shown in Fig. 2b, the value of ρAHEFe3Sn2 of only the Fe3Sn2 layer (denoted by a black dashed arrow) is extracted from the saturation region of ρxyFe3Sn2 and found to be 3.56μΩcm. This value for polycrystalline Fe3Sn2 ultrathin film is comparable to the epitaxial Fe3Sn2 thin film reported by D. Khadka et al.21. Using MS620emucm-3 from SQUID measurements, we also determine the coefficient (RS) of the anomalous Hall resistivity for Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(5 nm)/AlOx film. The value of RS for Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(5 nm)/AlOx film is found to be 4.6×10-10ΩcmG-1 at 300 K, which is comparable to our previous report on polycrystalline Fe3Sn2 thin films35 and two orders higher than conventional ferromagnets (Ni & Fe)44,45. Moreover, we determine the value of the anomalous Hall conductivity (|σAHEFe3Sn2|) using the equation: |σAHEFe3Sn2|(ρAHEFe3Sn2)/(ρxxFe3Sn2)2. The value of |σAHEFe3Sn2| is found to be 82Ω-1cm-1 at 300 K. A large value of RS and |σAHEFe3Sn2| in Fe3Sn2film indicates an intrinsic band structure (Berry curvature) origin of the AHE16,17,35. These results indicate that the intrinsic transport properties, such as a large value of RS and a significant |σAHEFe3Sn2|, remain intact even for ultra-low thicknesses of Fe3Sn2 films. In Fig. 2c, we have also plotted the variation of longitudinal resistivity (ρxx) versus external magnetic field for 5 nm ultra-thin Fe3Sn2 film. The inset of Fig. 2c represents the corresponding magnetoresistance (MR=Δρxx/ρxx(0)) of Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(5 nm)/AlOx film. A negative change in MR in our thin films is caused due to the suppression of magnon at room temperature (300 K), consistent with the previous report on single crystal Fe3Sn216,22.

Ferromagnetic resonance measurement

Figure 3a represents the schematic of a co-planar waveguide (CPW) based FMR setup with the film placed on top of it. Here, H is the external magnetic field swept parallel to the film plane and perpendicular to the rf excitation field (hrf). The FMR setup details can be found in the Methods section. Fig. 3b shows FMR measurements for a Ta/Pt/Fe3Sn2(5 nm)/AlOx thin film. The frequency (f) dependent FMR spectra are shown at an interval of 2 GHz. The solid black lines are fits to derivatives of symmetric and asymmetric Lorentzian functions4649. From these fits, we extract the resonance field (HR) and linewidth (ΔH) in the frequency range 4-20 GHz. The variation of f is plotted as a function of HR in Fig. 4a for all Fe3Sn2 thicknesses, and then fitted to the Kittel formula50:

f=γ2π(HR+HK)(HR+HK+4πMeff), 3

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) The schematic of CPW-based FMR setup, inset shows the zoom image of the sample placed on top of CPW sweeping the external magnetic field H parallel to the film plane. (b) The frequency dependence of this FMR spectrum (open triangles) was obtained for Fe3Sn2(5 nm) and fitted (solid black line) with the sum of the derivative of the Lorentzian function.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Frequency (f) plotted as a function of resonance field (HR) and fitted with Kittel Eq. (3). (b) The dependence of uniaxial anisotropy field HK over the thickness of Fe3Sn2 film, the dotted line represents the average value of HK. (c) The extracted value of Meff is plotted over the inverse thickness (tFe3Sn2-1) of the ferromagnet and fitted with Eq. (4). (d) The variation of linewidth (ΔH) with frequency (f) and fitted with linewidth Eq. (5). (e) The variation of inhomogeneous linewidth ΔH0 plotted over the thickness of Fe3Sn2 film. (f) Effective damping constant (αeff) as a function of inverse thickness (tFe3Sn2-1) of ferromagnet together with the fit using Eq. (6). Here, the solid symbols and solid lines represent the experimental data and fit, respectively.

Here, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio. HR, HK, and Meff are the resonance field, uniaxial anisotropy field, and the effective saturation magnetization of the ferromagnet. Using the value of γ=185GHz/T27 and fitting with Eq. (3) we extracted HK and Meff for different thickness of Fe3Sn2 [Fig. 4b and c]. In Fig. 4b, the average value of |HK| for Fe3Sn2(2-7 nm) films is found to be around 130 Oe. Furthermore, the uniaxial anisotropy constant (Ku) of Fe3Sn2 film is determine by: Ku=HKMS/2. The value of Ku is found to be 9.3×104ergcm-3, which is one order lower than bulk single crystal51. In Fig. 4c, the behavior of Meff over the thickness of Fe3Sn2 is plotted and fitted with the equation;

Meff=MS-2KSμ0MS×tFe3Sn2-1, 4

Here, μ0 is the permeability constant of free space. MS and KS are the saturation magnetization and surface anisotropy constant, respectively. From the fitting, the values of MS and KS are found to be (599±29)emucm-3 and (0.29±0.02)ergcm-2, respectively. It is noteworthy that we found a good agreement between the values of MS obtained from the FMR technique and the SQUID data.

The ΔH versus f for all the thicknesses is plotted (solid open symbol) in Fig. 4(d) and fitted with the expression5255:

ΔH=ΔH0+2παeffγf, 5

Here, the first term, ΔH0 denotes the inhomogeneous broadening, which largely depends on the quality of the sample. The second term indicates the effective damping (αeff). In Fig. 4d, from fits of ΔH versus f with the Eq. (5) for various thicknesses, we extracted ΔH0 and αeff. The value of the inhomogeneous broadening, ΔH0 is found to be less than 40 Oe for all films [as shown in Fig. 4e]. Here, we found a monotonic increase in αeff for the thickness of ferromagnet Fe3Sn2. Figure 4f shows the value of αeff with the inverse of ferromagnetic thickness (tFe3Sn2-1). The behavior was fitted with56,57:

αeff=αint+geffγ4πMS×tFe3Sn2-1, 6

where αint represent the intrinsic Gilbert damping constant of the ferromagnet Fe3Sn2, while and geff represent the effective spin mixing conductance of Pt/Fe3Sn2 system. From the fitting, we found αint to be around (3.8±0.2)×10-2 and geff to be (11.7±0.6)nm-2. The αint depends on both spin-orbit coupling as well as the phase lag between the distortions of the Fermi surface and the precessing magnetization. The intrinsic mechanism of Gilbert damping is commonly ascribed to spin-orbit coupling through two potential mechanisms: interband and intraband scattering58,59. In the interband scattering mechanism, the magnetization dynamics can generate electron-hole pairs across different bands. This leads to a Gilbert damping effect that scales with the resistivity60,61. Conversely, in the intraband scattering scenario, electron-hole pairs are generated within the same electronic band, resulting in a Gilbert damping effect that scales with the conductivity62,63. Our value of αint is relatively larger compared to transition metal thin films, and since the resistivity of Fe3Sn2 is found to be larger, we speculate that the mechanism of intrinsic damping in our polycrystalline Fe3Sn2 films is “resistivity-like”. However, more studies (e.g., temperature dependence) are needed to determine the mechanism of intrinsic damping in Fe3Sn2. The order of geff for Fe3Sn2/Pt is almost comparable to other Pt-based FM heterostructures48,64,65, indicating that ferromagnet Fe3Sn2 can also be used as an effective spin current source. Hence, a large value of spin mixing conductance in Fe3Sn2/Pt bilayer system, together with its exotic magneto-transport properties, can be beneficial for memory-based device applications.

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrate the growth of ultra-thin polycrystalline phase of Fe3Sn2 films with varying thicknesses (2-7 nm). The XRD, XRR, and AFM results show high-quality films with low surface/interfacial roughness. The magneto-static and magneto-transport results suggest the formation of the ferromagnetic phase and the intrinsic AHE nature of Fe3Sn2 films, respectively. Here, we report the first measurements of the intrinsic Gilbert damping constant (αint), and effective spin mixing conductance (geff) in Fe3Sn2 films. The extracted value of αint, and geff is found to be (3.8±0.2)×10-2, and (11.7±0.6)nm-2, respectively. A large value of geff obtained from FMR measurements suggest ferromagnet Fe3Sn2 can also be a potential material to generate pure spin current. These results promote the inexpensive and widely used sputter material growth of such quantum materials.

Methods

Sample preparation

The ultrathin films of Fe3Sn2(tnm) with varying thicknesses (t = 2, 3, 5, and 7) on Si-SiO2 substrate were deposited using RF magnetron sputtering35 at room temperature. An optimized low growth rate of 0.2  A˚s-1 was used for better control over the ultra-low thickness of Fe3Sn2 films. The base pressure of the sputtering chamber was better than 6.7×10-8 mbar, while the working pressure was maintained at 2.7×10-3 mbar. These thin films were post-annealed in-situ at 500C for 1 hour to improve the crystallinity. A 3 nm aluminum (Al) layer was capped on all films to protect these samples from oxidation.

Sample characterization

The structural properties of these films were analyzed with the help of the X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique using a PANalytical X’Pert diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (λ=1.5418A˚). The elemental and compositional analyses of these films were determined with the help of the electronic probe microscopy analysis (EPMA) technique. We determine the composition of Fe and Sn to be 61 at.% and 39 at.% in all the samples. The average surface roughness and topography of these films were obtained using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) technique in tapping mode (Asylum Research, MFP-3D system). The thickness, roughness, and density of these Fe3Sn2 films were measured using the X-ray reflectivity (XRR) measurement technique. The static magnetization measurements were carried out using the magnetic property magnetic system (MPMS) with a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) using Quantum Design Inc. The magneto-transport properties were measured using the physical property measurement system (PPMS) technique from Quantum Design Inc. (Evercool-II). We employed four-terminal sensing techniques: linear contact geometry for determining longitudinal resistivity and Hall contact geometry for the transverse resistivity. One pair of contact electrodes is used to supply the DC current in the sample, while the other pair of contact electrodes perpendicular (parallel) to the current direction is used for sensing the transverse (longitudinal) voltage. The magneto-dynamic measurements are performed using NanOsc PhaseFMR-40 FMR setup in the 4-20 GHz frequency range. The instrument used field modulation (AC field of 1 Oe peak to peak) for a higher signal-to-noise ratio (using Helmholtz coils with 490 Hz reference frequency). The measurements are performed with an RF power of 12.5-17.6 dBm (varying for different frequency ranges).

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The partial support from the Science & Engineering Research Board [SERB File no. CRG/2022/002821], the Ministry of Human Resource Development under the IMPRINT program [Grant no: 7519 and 7058], the Department of Science and Technology under the Nanomission program [Grant no: SR/NM/NT-1041/2016(G)], the Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeitY), Joint Advanced Technology Centre at IIT Delhi, and the Grand Challenge project supported by IIT Delhi are gratefully acknowledged. KIAK acknowledges support from the University Grants Commission (UGC), India. This work was also partially supported by the Horizon 2020 research and innovation program No. 835068 “TOPSPIN” and the Swedish Research Council (VR Grant No. 2016-05980).

Author contributions

P.K.M. and J.Å. proposed the experiment and provided the experiment facilities. K.I.A.K. executed the project and grew the samples. K.I.A.K. and R.S.Y. performed the structural, magnetization, and magneto-transport measurements. A.K. and P.G. performed the spin-dynamic measurement. All authors helped in data analysis, co-wrote, and revised the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Gothenburg.

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Johan Åkerman, Email: johan.akerman@physics.gu.se.

Pranaba Kishor Muduli, Email: muduli@physics.iitd.ac.in.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-53621-z.

References

  • 1.Tokura, Y., Kawasaki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Emergent functions of quantum materials. Nat. Phys.13, 1056–1068 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Han, W., Otani, Y. & Maekawa, S. Quantum materials for spin and charge conversion. npj Quantum Mater.3, 27 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shao, Q. et al. Roadmap of spin-orbit torques. IEEE Trans. Magn.57, 1–39 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang, Y. & Yang, H. Spin-orbit torques based on topological materials. Acc. Mater. Res.3, 1061–1072 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chowdhury, N. et al. Kagome magnets: The emerging materials for spintronic memories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. A93, 477–495 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kumar, A. et al. Interfacial Origin of Unconventional Spin-Orbit Torque in Py/Inline graphic-IrMnInline graphic. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2300092 (2023).
  • 8.Armitage, N., Mele, E. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lv, B. et al. Observation of Weyl nodes in TaAs. Nat. Phys.11, 724–727 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xu, S.-Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion state with Fermi arcs in niobium arsenide. Nat. Phys.11, 748–754 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Weng, H., Fang, C., Fang, Z., Bernevig, B. A. & Dai, X. Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transition-metal monophosphides. Phys. Rev. X5, 011029 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Soluyanov, A. A. et al. Type-II weyl semimetals. Nature527, 495–498 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Taguchi, Y., Oohara, Y., Yoshizawa, H., Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Spin chirality, Berry phase, and anomalous Hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnet. Science291, 2573–2576 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nayak, A. K. et al. Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet MnInline graphicGe. Sci. Adv.2, e1501870 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye, L. et al. Massive Dirac fermions in a ferromagnetic kagome metal. Nature555, 638–642 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kida, T. et al. The giant anomalous Hall effect in the ferromagnet FeInline graphicSnInline graphic-a frustrated kagome metal. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter23, 112205 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang, Q. et al. Large intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in half-metallic ferromagnet CoInline graphicSnInline graphicSInline graphic with magnetic Weyl fermions. Nat. Commun.9, 3681 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen, T. et al. Large anomalous Nernst effect and nodal plane in an iron-based kagome ferromagnet. Sci. Adv.8, eabk1480 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miyasato, T. et al. Crossover behavior of the anomalous Hall effect and anomalous Nernst effect in itinerant ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 086602 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khadka, D. et al. Anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in epitaxial films of topological kagome magnet FeInline graphicSnInline graphic. Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 084203 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li, H. et al. Large topological Hall effect in a geometrically frustrated kagome magnet FeInline graphicSnInline graphic. Appl. Phys. Lett.114, 192408 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Le Caer, G., Malaman, B., Haggstrom, L. & Ericsson, T. Magnetic properties of FeInline graphicSnInline graphic. III. A Inline graphicSn Mossbauer study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter.9, 1905 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ren, Z. et al. Plethora of tunable Weyl fermions in kagome magnet FeInline graphicSnInline graphic thin films. npj Quantum Mater.7, 109 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Le Caër, G., Malaman, B. & Roques, B. Mossbauer effect study of FeInline graphicSnInline graphic. J. Phys. F Met. Phys.8, 323 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yao, M. et al. Switchable Weyl nodes in topological Kagome ferromagnet FeInline graphicSnInline graphic. Preprint at arXiv:1810.01514 (2018).
  • 27.Lyalin, I., Cheng, S. & Kawakami, R. K. Spin-orbit torque in bilayers of kagome ferromagnet FeInline graphicSnInline graphic and Pt. Nano Lett.21, 6975–6982 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Satake, Y., Fujiwara, K., Shiogai, J., Seki, T. & Tsukazaki, A. Fe-Sn nanocrystalline films for flexible magnetic sensors with high thermal stability. Sci. Rep.9, 1–7 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Du, Q. et al. Room-Temperature Skyrmion Thermopower in FeInline graphicSnInline graphic. Adv. Quantum Technol.3, 2000058 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hou, Z. et al. Observation of various and spontaneous magnetic skyrmionic bubbles at room temperature in a frustrated kagome magnet with uniaxial magnetic anisotropy. Adv. Mater.29, 1701144 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tang, E., Mei, J.-W. & Wen, X.-G. High-temperature fractional quantum Hall states. Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236802 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fenner, L., Dee, A. & Wills, A. Non-collinearity and spin frustration in the itinerant kagome ferromagnet FeInline graphicSnInline graphic. J. Phys. Condens. Matter21, 452202 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Heritage, K. et al. Images of a first-order spin-reorientation phase transition in a metallic kagome ferromagnet. Adv. Funct. Mater.30, 1909163 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lin, Z. et al. Flatbands and emergent ferromagnetic ordering in FeInline graphicSnInline graphic kagome lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 096401 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khan, K. I. A. et al. Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in thin films of topological kagome ferromagnet FeInline graphicSnInline graphic. Nanoscale14, 8484–8492 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Feng, Y. P. et al. Prospects of spintronics based on 2D materials. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci.7, e1313 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Barla, P., Joshi, V. K. & Bhat, S. Spintronic devices: A promising alternative to CMOS devices. J. Comput. Electron.20, 805–837 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Parratt, L. G. Surface studies of solids by total reflection of X-rays. Phys. Rev.95, 359 (1954). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang, D., Hou, Z. & Mi, W. Anomalous and topological Hall effects of ferromagnetic FeInline graphicSnInline graphic epitaxial films with kagome lattice. Appl. Phys. Lett.120, 232401 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gupta, K., Wesselink, R. J., Liu, R., Yuan, Z. & Kelly, P. J. Disorder dependence of interface spin memory loss. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 087702 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Belashchenko, K. D., Kovalev, A. A. & van Schilfgaarde, M. Theory of spin loss at metallic interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 207204 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hurd, C. M. Hall Effect in Metals and Alloys (Plenum Press, 1972). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shekhar, C. et al. Extremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological Weyl semimetal candidate NbP. Nat. Phys.11, 645–649 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Volkenshtein, N. & Fedorov, G. Temperature dependence of the Hall effect of pure ferromagnets. Sov. Phys. JETP11, 48–50 (1960). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kaul, S. N. Anomalous Hall effect in nickel and nickel-rich nickel-copper alloys. Phys. Rev. B20, 5122 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Woltersdorf, G. Spin-Pumping and Two-Magnon Scattering in Magnetic Multilayers (Simon Fraser University, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang, W., Han, W., Jiang, X., Yang, S.-H. & SP Parkin, S. Role of transparency of platinum-ferromagnet interfaces in determining the intrinsic magnitude of the spin Hall effect. Nat. Phys.11, 496–502 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kumar, A. et al. Influence of annealing on spin pumping in sputtered deposited Co/Pt bilayer thin films. Phys. B Cond. Matt.570, 254–258 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kumar, A., Bansal, R., Chaudhary, S. & Muduli, P. K. Large spin current generation by the spin hall effect in mixed crystalline phase Ta thin films. Phys. Rev. B98, 104403 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kittel, C. On the theory of ferromagnetic resonance absorption. Phys. Rev.73, 155 (1948). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tang, J. et al. Target bubbles in FeInline graphicSnInline graphic nanodisks at zero magnetic field. ACS Nano14, 10986–10992 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rossing, T. D. Resonance linewidth and anisotropy variation in thin films. J. Appl. Phys.34, 995–995 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Heinrich, B., Cochran, J. & Hasegawa, R. FMR linebroadening in metals due to two-magnon scattering. J. Appl. Phys.57, 3690–3692 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Celinski, Z. & Heinrich, B. Ferromagnetic resonance linewidth of Fe ultrathin films grown on a bcc Cu substrate. J. Appl. Phys.70, 5935–5937 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.McMichael, R. D., Twisselmann, D. & Kunz, A. Localized ferromagnetic resonance in inhomogeneous thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 227601 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bangar, H. et al. Large spin hall conductivity in epitaxial thin films of kagome antiferromagnet MnInline graphicSn at room temperature. Adv. Quant. Tech.6(1), 2200115 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Khan, K. I. A., Gupta, P., Agarwal, R., Chowdhury, N. & Muduli, P. K. Comparative study of spin pumping in epitaxial-and polycrystalline-NiO/NiInline graphicFeInline graphic. SPIN (2023).
  • 58.Heinrich, B. Ultrathin Magnetic Structures I: An Introduction to the Electronic, Magnetic and Structural Properties (Springer-Verlag, Springer Science & Business Media, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mewes, C. K. & Mewes, T. Relaxation in Magnetic Materials for Spintronics (Pan Stanford, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ma, X. et al. Role of antisite disorder on intrinsic Gilbert damping in Inline graphic FePt films. Phys. Rev. B91, 014438 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Heinrich, B. & Frait, Z. Temperature dependence of the FMR linewidth of iron single-crystal platelets. Phys. Stat. Solidi (b)16, K11–K14 (1966). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kamberskỳ, V. On the Landau-Lifshitz relaxation in ferromagnetic metals. Can. J. Phys.48, 2906–2911 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Khodadadi, B. et al. Conductivitylike Gilbert damping due to intraband scattering in epitaxial iron. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 157201 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mosendz, O. et al. Quantifying spin Hall angles from spin pumping: Experiments and theory. Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 046601 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ando, K. et al. Inverse spin-Hall effect induced by spin pumping in metallic system. J. Appl. Phys.109, 10 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES