Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
editorial
. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):332–334. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.332

Cell adhesion molecules

Sticky moments in the clinic 

Paul Murray 1, G Frampton 1, PN Nelson 1
PMCID: PMC1126974  PMID: 10435939

Cell adhesion molecules were first identified through their ability to allow cells to adhere to each other and to the extracellular matrix. We now know, however, that this group of cell surface receptors not only promotes adhesion but also allows cells to interact and communicate with each other and their environment and, in doing so, regulates a range of cell functions, including proliferation, gene expression, differentiation, apoptosis, and migration. A theme issue of Molecular Pathology, published this month, provides an opportunity to review work on cell adhesion, including its application to clinical practice.

There are at least five groups of cell adhesion molecules: integrins, selectins, adhesion molecules belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily, cadherins, and the CD44 family. All cell adhesion molecules bind to other cells or matrix components through their interaction with appropriate counter-structures, referred to as a ligands. In some cases the ligands are themselves adhesion molecules, as is the case with the selectin family, whose ligands are members of the immunoglobulin superfamily, and vice versa.

Cell adhesion molecules are critical to many normal physiological processes. During embryogenesis, for example, the differential expression of adhesion molecules is responsible for the selective association of embryonic cells into specific tissues, and in the immune system adhesion molecules mediate the migration and homing of lymphocytes to specific tissues. Given their widespread importance it is not surprising that cell adhesion molecules have also been implicated in many diverse pathological processes such as inflammation and wound healing, septic shock, transplant rejection, cancer, and atherosclerosis.

Recently, an understanding of the role of cell adhesion molecules in these processes has suggested their use as either diagnostic or prognostic markers, or as potential targets for therapeutic intervention. This is best exemplified in cancer. Loss of cell-cell adhesiveness contributes to the process of metastasis, whereby tumour cells can invade surrounding tissues and disseminate to distant organs. The cell adhesion system mediated by E (epithelial) cadherin has been shown to be critical to maintaining cell-cell adhesion and is often inactivated in epithelial cancers. This inactivation may result from mutations that directly affect the genes for E-cadherin or may occur in those genes that code for the catenins, a group of molecules that connect cadherins to actin filaments and establish firm cell-cell adhesion. In fact, loss of E-cadherin expression is an adverse prognostic indicator in several carcinomas, including those of the colon, stomach, prostate, and breast.1 In some situations, as in the development of oesophageal cancer, temporal changes in adhesion molecule expression correlate with tumour progression.2

Abnormalities in the CD44 cell adhesion molecules have also been intensively investigated in many types of cancer. Variants of the CD44 protein may be created by a process known as alternative splicing. Expression of certain CD44 variants (CD44v) by cancer cells is associated with the ability of these cells to metastasise and with a poor prognosis.3 Also, soluble forms of CD44 (sCD44) may be detected in the serum of patients with cancer and in some settings correlate with clinical markers of disease. In non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, for example, high serum levels of sCD44 at diagnosis are associated with a high international prognostic index score, poor response to treatment, and an unfavourable outcome.4

The possible use of CD44 as a diagnostic marker is emphasised by the detection of CD44 variants in exfoliated cells in urine, which correlates with the presence of urogenital malignancies,5 and in faecal samples from patients with colorectal cancer.6 Furthermore, animal experiments have shown that injection of reagents interfering with CD44-ligand interaction (for example CD44v specific antibodies) inhibits local tumour growth and metastatic spread.7 Recently, Dall et al described a novel approach to target CD44 in cervical cancer: cytotoxic T lymphocytes were genetically modified to express a recognition site for a CD44v form often detected in cervical cancer but absent from normal cervical epithelium.8 Target cells expressing this CD44v were killed by these cytotoxic T lymphocytes, but control cells were not. Clearly, although still experimental, these approaches offer promise as potential therapies for metastatic cancers in which CD44 variants are expressed.

One of the most important events in the reaction to all forms of injury is the adhesion of leucocytes to endothelium, which precedes their emigration to the tissues and is central to the processes of inflammation and immune reaction. Leucocyte adhesion to the endothelium is mediated by adhesion molecule pairs, principally the selectins (E, L, and P), members of the immunoglobulin superfamily (ICAM-1 and VCAM-1), and the integrins. The importance of these adhesion molecules in lymphocyte recruitment has been shown in several pathological processes, including transplant rejection, septic shock, atherosclerosis, and late phase hypersensitivity and in reperfusion injury.

For example, in acute stroke it is postulated that the presence of adhesion molecules on the surface of glial cells facilitates the post-ischaemic migration of leucocytes through the brain parenchyma. The relevance of adhesion molecules to the pathogenesis of ischaemic brain damage has been corroborated by studies showing that, compared with normal controls, ICAM-1 deficient mice show a significant reduction in cerebral infarction size after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion.9 One observation with potential clinical relevance is that the expression of adhesion molecules caused by cytokines is higher in endothelial cells from hypertensive rats than in those from normotensive rats, suggesting that ischaemic injury may have more severe consequences in hypertensive individuals.10 Up regulation of adhesion molecules has also been documented in people with stroke. Leucocytes from patients having an ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack showed higher integrin (CD11a) expression within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms than in controls matched for age and risk factors.11

The potential for intervention to prevent lymphocyte recruitment in many pathological processes is suggested by recent studies in which antisense oligonucleotides to ICAM-1 prevented ischaemic reperfusion injury and delayed graft rejection in experimental renal transplantation.12 It is possible to envisage how such approaches may be applied to treating or preventing other conditions in which adhesion molecules have a pathogenic role. Recently, for example, antibodies to ICAM-1 have been shown to reverse atherogenesis in hypercholesterolaemic rats.13 The detection of raised levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in patients with stable angina pectoris who develop myocardial infarction suggests that similar approaches may be useful in preventing cardiovascular disease in humans.14

Although the diagnostic and therapeutic usefulness of adhesion molecules remains largely untapped, an increasing awareness of their roles in disease states suggests greater opportunities for their clinical application. For example, new knowledge of the role of adhesion molecules in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases may enable new approaches to treating resistant infections.15 In future, the development of treatments for inflammatory diseases may depend on the selective inhibition of lymphocyte recruitment to a particular tissue without preventing normal recruitment elsewhere. Alternatively, lymphocytes could be programmed in vitroto express receptors that would target specific tissues.

References

  • 1.Beavon RG. Regulation of E-cadherin: does hypoxia initiate the metastatic cascade. Mol Pathol. 1999;52:179–188. doi: 10.1136/mp.52.4.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jankowski JA, Wright NA, Meltzer SJ, Triadafilopoulos G, Geboes K, Casson AG, et al. Molecular evolution of the metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence in the esophagus. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:965–973. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65346-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goodison S, Urquidi V, Tarin D. CD44 cell adhesion molecules. Mol Pathol. 1999;52:189–196. doi: 10.1136/mp.52.4.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ristamaki R, Joensuu H, Lappalainen K, Teerenhovi L, Jalkanen S. Elevated serum CD44 level is associated with unfavorable outcome in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1997;90:4039–4045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matsumura Y, Hanbury D, Smith J, Tarin D. Non-invasive detection of malignancy by identification of unusual CD44 gene activity in exfoliated cancer cells. BMJ. 1994;308:619–624. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6929.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamao T, Matsumura Y, Shimada Y, Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, et al. Abnormal expression of CD44 variants in the exfoliated cells in the feces of patients with colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:1196–1205. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70425-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seiter S, Arch R, Reber S, Komitowski D, Hofmann M, Ponta H, et al. Prevention of tumor metastasis formation by anti-variant CD44. J Exp Med. 1993;177:443–455. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.2.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dall P, Hekele A, Beckmann MW, Bender HG, Herrlich P, Ponta H. Efficient lysis of CD44v7/8-presenting target cells by genetically engineered cytotoxic T-lymphocytes: a model for immunogene therapy of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;66:209–216. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Connolly ES, Jr, Winfree CJ, Springer TA, Naka Y, Liao H, Yan SD, et al. Cerebral protection in homozygous null ICAM-1 mice after middle cerebral artery occlusion: role of neutrophil adhesion in the pathogenesis of stroke. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:209–216. doi: 10.1172/JCI118392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCarron RM, Wang L, Siren AL, Spatz M, Hallenbeck JM. Adhesion molecules on normotensive and hypertensive rat brain endothelial cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1994;205:257–262. doi: 10.3181/00379727-205-43706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim JS, Chopp M, Chen H, Levine SR, Carey JL, Welch KMA. Adhesive glycoproteins CD11a and CD18 are upregulated in the leukocytes from patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks. J Neurol Sci. 1995;128:45–50. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(94)00203-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dragun D, Haller H. Diapedesis of leukocytes: antisense oligonucleotides for rescue. Exp Nephrol. 1999;7:185–192. doi: 10.1159/000020599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nie Q, Fan J, Haraoka S, Shimokama T, Watanabe T. Inhibition of mononuclear cell recruitment in aortic intima by treatment with anti-ICAM-1 and anti-LFA-1 monoclonal antibodies in hypercholesterolemic rats: implications of the ICAM-1 and LFA-1 pathway in atherogenesis. Lab Invest. 1997;77:469–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wallen NH, Held C, Rehnqvist N, Hjemdahl P. Elevated serum intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular adhesion molecule-1 among patients with stable angina pectoris who suffer cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:1039–1043. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kerr JR. Cell adhesion in the pathogenesis of host defence against microbial infection. Mol Pathol. 1999;52:220–230. doi: 10.1136/mp.52.4.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES