Abstract
We herein report a case of sporadic intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis in which contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) combined with superb microvascular imaging (SMI) was useful for preoperative diagnosis. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography performed for systematic screening for lung cancer revealed an abnormal accumulation in the abdominal cavity. Transabdominal US showed a tumor with a mixture of hypoechoic and hyperechoic areas. Contrast-enhanced US combined with SMI revealed dendritic blood flow signals and no abnormal vascular network within the tumor. Macroscopic examination of the resected specimen revealed a white tumor with relatively clear boundaries. Microscopic examination revealed spindle cells with poor atypia proliferating in bundles with collagenous stromal cells. Immunohistochemistry showed nuclear localization of beta-catenin within the tumor cells. From these findings, we finally diagnosed intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis. Contrast-enhanced US combined with SMI is useful for diagnosing intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis.
Keywords: Intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis, Diagnosis, Transabdominal ultrasonography, Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, Superb microvascular imaging
Introduction
Desmoid-type fibromatosis is extremely rare, with an incidence of 2 to 5 cases per million inhabitants in European countries. The median age at diagnosis of desmoid-type fibromatosis is approximately 35 years, and most patients are women [1,2]. Desmoid-type fibromatosis can be intra-abdominal, within the abdominal wall, extra-abdominal, or located at multiple sites. Extra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis can develop in any musculoaponeurotic structure throughout the body, such as the shoulder, chest wall, breast, back, thigh, head, or neck. Intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis arises within the mesentery or pelvis. By contrast, desmoid-type fibromatosis within the abdominal wall arises from musculoaponeurotic structures of the abdominal wall, especially the rectus muscle, internal oblique muscle, and their fascial coverings [3,4]. This type of desmoid-type fibromatosis has a higher rate in women with a recent pregnancy [5].
Intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis is usually diagnosed using abdominal computed tomography (CT) and/or abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [6,7]. Transabdominal ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced US are also useful for diagnosing intra-abdominal lesions [[8], [9], [10], [11]]. These radiation-free modalities can be performed repeatedly and have excellent real-time performance. In some past case reports, intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis was observed using transabdominal US [12,13]. However, no reports have described using contrast-enhanced US for this purpose. We herein present a case of intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis in which contrast-enhanced US was useful for preoperative diagnosis.
Case report
A woman in her 70s visited a physician at our institution for a detailed examination of a tumor in the left lower lung field pointed out during a medical examination. A lung tumor was diagnosed as adenocarcinoma by CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) performed for systematic screening revealed an abnormal accumulation in the abdominal cavity. Therefore, she underwent a consultation for gastro-intestinal surgery. Her operative history included laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones and hysterectomy for uterine myoma. Her family history was unremarkable. Physical examination revealed a fist-sized mass without tenderness in the umbilical region. Laboratory tests showed a carcinoembryonic antigen level of 4.3 ng/mL (reference range, 0.0–5.0 ng/mL) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level of <2.1 U/mL (reference range, 0.0–37.0 U/mL). Her white blood cell count, red blood cell count, platelet count, liver function, and renal function were normal.
FDG-PET showed FDG accumulation in the abdominal tumor below the abdominal wall at the level of the umbilicus. The FDG accumulation had a maximum standardized uptake value of 4.41 (Fig. 1, red arrow). Transabdominal US (Aplio i700 TUS-I700; Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan) showed a tumor with a mixture of hypoechoic and hyperechoic areas (35.0 × 28.7 mm) in the abdominal cavity (Fig. 2A, red arrow). A sliding sign between the abdominal wall and the tumor and between the gastrointestinal tract and the tumor was confirmed. No ascites or peritoneal nodules were observed in the abdominal cavity. Contrast-enhanced US using perflubutane (Sonazoid; GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) showed no echogenic areas suggestive of necrosis within the tumor (Fig. 2B). Contrast-enhanced US combined with superb microvascular imaging (SMI) (Canon Medical Systems) revealed dendritic blood flow signals and no abnormal vascular network within the tumor (Fig. 2C). Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated a tumor of 45 mm in diameter with clear borders and uniform contrast enhancement at the level of the umbilicus. Part of the tumor had invaded the abdominal wall and transverse colon (Fig. 3A, axial image, red arrow; Fig. 3B, sagittal image, red arrow). On abdominal MRI, the tumor showed isointense signals relative to muscle on T1-weighted images (Fig. 4A, axial image, red arrow) and mild high-intensity signals on T2-weighted images, (Fig. 4B, axial image, red arrow). The tumor showed a gradual and uniform contrast enhancement effect on fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images (Fig. 4C, sagittal image, red arrow). Colonoscopy showed no neoplastic lesions.
Fig. 1.
FDG-PET findings. FDG accumulation was observed in the abdominal tumor below the abdominal wall at the umbilical level (red arrow). FDG-PET, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Fig. 2.
Transabdominal US and contrast-enhanced US findings. (A) Transabdominal US showed a tumor with a mixture of hypoechoic and hyperechoic areas in the abdominal cavity (red arrow). (B) Contrast-enhanced US showed no echogenic areas suggestive of necrosis within the tumor. (C) Contrast-enhanced US combined with superb microvascular imaging revealed dendritic blood flow signals and no abnormal vascular network within the tumor. US, ultrasonography.
Fig. 3.
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography findings. A tumor with clear borders and contrast enhancement was observed in the abdominal cavity at the level of the umbilicus (red arrows). (A) Axial image. (B) Sagittal image.
Fig. 4.
Magnetic resonance imaging findings. A mosaic pattern was observed, with a mixture of (A) isointense signals within the tumor on a T1-weighted axial image (red arrow) and (B) mild high-intensity signals on a T2-weighted axial image (red arrow). (C) A sagittal fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted image showed a gradual and uniform contrast enhancement effect (red arrow).
We preoperatively diagnosed intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis and performed peritoneal resection and partial transverse colectomy. The patient resumed eating on postoperative day 3. She developed a fever of 38.0℃ or higher but was discharged 26 days after surgery.
Macroscopic examination of the resected specimen demonstrated a well-circumscribed, whitish tumor (57 × 45 × 25 mm) (Fig. 5A, red arrows). Microscopic examination revealed spindle cells with poor atypia proliferating in bundles with collagenous stromal cells (Fig. 5B). Immunohistochemistry showed nuclear localization of beta-catenin within the tumor cells (Fig. 5C) and negativity for c-kit, DOG-1, desmin, S-100, STAT6, and CD34 (data not shown). The median Ki-67 index was 5.5%. The surgical margin was negative. From these findings, we pathologically diagnosed intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis.
Fig. 5.
Macroscopic and microscopic findings of the resected specimen. (A) Macroscopic examination demonstrated a well-circumscribed, whitish tumor (red arrows). (B) Microscopic examination of the resected specimen revealed spindle cells with poor atypia proliferating in bundles with collagenous stromal cells. (C) Immunohistochemistry showed nuclear localization of beta-catenin within the tumor cells.
Abdominal CT performed 6 months after surgery revealed no findings of recurrence.
Discussion
Most cases of desmoid-type fibromatosis develop sporadically. However, some cases occur in the context of Gardner's syndrome (a variant of familial adenomatous polyposis), and their location is more often intra-abdominal than is the sporadic form [14]. Tumorigenesis is linked to beta-catenin stabilization involving beta-catenin/Wnt/T-cell factor signaling [15,16]. In the present case, colonoscopy showed no evidence of familial adenomatous polyposis, and beta-catenin was immunohistologically positive in the resected tumor specimen. Therefore, we diagnosed sporadic intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis.
Contrast-enhanced US can be used to evaluate vascular structure. Onji et al. [17] reported that the microvascular structure in colon cancer was irregular and characterized by large vessels, whereas acute inflammation was not observed. Alternatively, SMI is a new technology that can distinguish Doppler signals generated by low-velocity blood flow from those generated by tissue movement. This technique can reduce motion artifacts and simultaneously provide a high level of sensitivity and imaging resolution at a high frame rate [18]. The effect of SMI is further enhanced by combining it with contrast-enhanced US [10]. For preoperative diagnosis in the present case, it was necessary to differentiate between intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis and intra-abdominal metastasis of lung cancer because FDG-PET showed FDG accumulation within the tumor. We found no vascular network abnormalities within the intra-abdominal tumor as visualized by contrast-enhanced US combined with SMI. Additionally, transabdominal US and other imaging examinations revealed no ascites or disseminated nodules, thus ruling out a metastatic tumor.
Complete surgical removal remains the optimal treatment for intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis. However, it is sometimes impossible to radically remove the tumor because of the tumor's involvement with the base of the mesentery and its proximity to vital neurovascular structures. In some previous reports, the local recurrence rate was 15% to 30% even after complete resection [2,3]. Salas et al. [16] reported that an age of >37 years, tumor size of <70 mm, and tumors located in the abdominal wall or intra-abdominally have a lower risk of recurrence after surgery. Our patient was in her 70s and had an intra-abdominal tumor of <70 mm in size, and complete resection was possible. Although the risk of local recurrence appears to be low, careful follow-up is necessary.
Conclusion
We have reported a case of intra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis in which contrast-enhanced US combined with SMI was useful for preoperative diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced US combined with SMI can depict the vascular structure more clearly and is useful for qualitative diagnosis of intra-abdominal tumors.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Kawasaki Medical School (approval number: 6342). This study included no experiments involving human participants performed by any authors.
Patient consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this case report and any accompanying images.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments: We thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
References
- 1.van Broekhoven DL, Grunhagen DJ, den Bakker MA, van Dalen T, Verhoef C. Time trends in the incidence and treatment of extra-abdominal and abdominal aggressive fibromatosis: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2817–2823. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4632-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Penel N, Coindre JM, Bonvalot S, Italiano A, Neuville A, Le Cesne A, et al. Management of desmoid tumours: a nationwide survey of labelled reference centre networks in France. Eur J Cancer. 2016;58:90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shinagare AB, Ramaiya NH, Jagannathan JP, Krajewski KM, Giardino AA, Butrynski JE, et al. A to Z of desmoid tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W1008–W1014. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kasper B, Baumgarten C, Bonvalot S, Haas R, Haller F, Hohenberger P, et al. Management of sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a European consensus approach based on patients' and professionals' expertise - a sarcoma patients EuroNet and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group initiative. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stemmer SM, Gomes C, Cardonick EH. A case of painful growing abdominal wall mass during pregnancy requiring resection in the second trimester. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2024;2024 doi: 10.1155/2024/5881260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Elhaddad B, Gopireddy D, Liu S. A giant sporadic intra-abdominal desmoid tumor in a male patient: a case report. Cureus. 2022;14:e26633. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim SJ, Han JW, Yoon T, Choi H, Han YD. A giant, rapidly growing intra‑abdominal desmoid tumor of mesenteric origin in an adolescent male: a case report and literature review. Exp Ther Med. 2023;26:490. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fujita M, Manabe N, Honda K, Murao T, Osawa M, Kawai R, et al. Usefulness of ultrasonography for diagnosis of small bowel tumors: a comparison between ultrasonography and endoscopic modalities. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1464. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nakamura J, Manabe N, Kato K, Suehiro M, Ayaki M, Fujita M, et al. A case of idiopathic gastric intramural hematoma diagnosed using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and followed up with conservative treatment. Radiol Case Rep. 2022;17:4487–4491. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.08.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fujita M, Manabe N, Ayaki M, Bukeo-Uji E, Konishi T, Nakamura J, et al. Appendiceal mucocele pathologically classified as appendiceal epithelial hyperplasia and preoperatively diagnosed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2024;19:1166–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Konishi T, Manabe N, Shibuya A, Bukeo E, Nakamura J, Fujita M, et al. A case of strangulated bowel obstruction in which transabdominal ultrasound was useful for preoperative diagnosis. Radiol Case Rep. 2024;19:1480–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang Y, Zhang J, Pan Y. Management of unresectable and recurrent intra-abdominal desmoid tumors treated with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound: a retrospective single-center study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101:e30201. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abu-Jeyyab M, Al-Asbahi H, Al-Jafari M, Al-Tarawneh BK, Nashwan AJ. Aggressive fibromatosis of the left mesocolon mimicking a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report. Case Rep Oncol. 2023;16:1148–1155. doi: 10.1159/000534038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hizawa K, Iida M, Mibu R, Aoyagi K, Yao T, Fujishima M. Desmoid tumors in familial adenomatous polyposis/Gardner's syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997;25:334–337. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199707000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Salas S, Chibon F, Noguchi T, Terrier P, Ranchere-Vince D, Lagarde P, et al. Molecular characterization by array comparative genomic hybridization and DNA sequencing of 194 desmoid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Canc. 2010;49:560–568. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Salas S, Dufresne A, Bui B, Blay JY, Terrier P, Ranchere-Vince D, et al. Prognostic factors influencing progression-free survival determined from a series of sporadic desmoid tumors: a wait-and-see policy according to tumor presentation. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3553–3558. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Onji K, Yoshida S, Tanaka S, Takemura Y, Oka S, Yoshihara M, et al. Microvascular structure and perfusion imaging of colon cancer by means of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:297–303. doi: 10.1007/s00261-011-9738-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tanaka H. Current role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Med Ultrason. 2020;47(2001):239–255. doi: 10.1007/s10396-020-01012-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





