Skip to main content
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine logoLink to Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
. 2024 May 30;25(6):199. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2506199

Association between Human Blood Proteome and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction

Linghuan Wang 1,2, Weiwei Zhang 1,2, Zhiyi Fang 1,2, Tingting Lu 1,2, Zhenghui Gu 3, Ting Sun 2, Dong Han 2, Yabin Wang 2, Feng Cao 1,2,*
Editors: Manuel Martínez Sellés, Celestino Sardu
PMCID: PMC11270110  PMID: 39076342

Abstract

Background:

The objective of this study is to estimate the causal relationship between plasma proteins and myocardial infarction (MI) through Mendelian randomization (MR), predict potential target-mediated side effects associated with protein interventions, and ensure a comprehensive assessment of clinical safety.

Methods:

From 3 proteome genome-wide association studies (GWASs) involving 9775 European participants, 331 unique blood proteins were screened and chosed. The summary data related to MI were derived from a GWAS meta-analysis, incorporating approximately 61,000 cases and 577,000 controls. The assessment of associations between blood proteins and MI was conducted through MR analyses. A phenome-wide MR (Phe-MR) analysis was subsequently employed to determine the potential on-target side effects of protein interventions.

Results:

Causal mediators for MI were identified, encompassing cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1) (odds ratio [OR] per SD increase: 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13–1.18; p = 1.29 × 10-31), Selenoprotein S (SELENOS) (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.13–1.20; p = 4.73 × 10-24), killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 2DS2 (KIR2DS2) (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90–0.96; p = 1.08 × 10-5), vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29 (VPS29) (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.90–0.94; p = 8.05 × 10-13), and histo-blood group ABO system transferase (NAGAT) (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.03–1.07; p = 1.41 × 10-5). In the Phe-MR analysis, memory loss risk was mediated by CT-1, VPS29 exhibited favorable effects on the risk of 5 diseases, and KIR2DS2 showed no predicted detrimental side effects.

Conclusions:

Elevated genetic predictions of KIR2DS2 and VPS29 appear to be linked to a reduced risk of MI, whereas an increased risk is associated with CT-1, SELENOS, and NAGAT. The characterization of side effect profiles aids in the prioritization of drug targets. Notably, KIR2DS2 emerges as a potentially promising target for preventing and treating MI, devoid of predicted detrimental side effects.

Keywords: myocardial infarction, human blood proteome, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 2ds2, vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29, cardiotrophin-1, Selenoprotein S, histo-blood group ABO system transferase

1. Introduction

In Western countries, myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary artery disease are the primary pathologies for increased mortality [1], and are an increasing burden on global health even with highly effective statin therapy [2]. Coronary heart disease may initially be assymptomatic, and often presents as a major adverse event, such as a MI [3]. Therefore, new and improved strategies for the treatment and prevention of MI are needed. Plasma proteins are pivotal in the biological processes of a range of diseases [4, 5] and serve as the primary therapeutic targets for treatment and prevention [6, 7, 8]. Plasma proteins, due to their physical interaction with blood vessels, play a crucial role in circulatory disease pathophysiology.

Mendelian randomization (MR) employs genetic variants as instrumental variables to examine the causal impact of risk factors on outcomes. Due to the fixed nature of genetic variants at conception, the method is immune to biases arising from reverse causality [9, 10]. The results of MR are very similar to those of randomized controlled trials, and as a result, MR has gained increasing popularity as a method to provide more robust estimates for the causal effects of various risk factors on a spectrum of diseases [11, 12, 13]. Identifying genetic variants associated with proteins through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of plasma protein levels [13, 14, 15, 16] allows assessing the causal impact of potential drug targets through MR [16, 17].

Conducting a systematic MR, we sought to estimate the causal effects of plasma proteins on MI. We initially a systematic MR study involving 331 plasma proteins to pinpoint potential mediators of MI. Subsequently, a phenome-wide MR (Phe-MR) analysis was utilized to reveal unexpected adverse effects and explore possibilities for drug therapy. This analysis is designed to predict potential target-mediated side effects linked to protein interventions, ensuring a more thorough evaluation of clinical safety.

2.Methods

2.1 Study Design

Following the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)-MR guideline, the current study ensured adherence to the standards for reporting observational studies in epidemiology using MR [18]. Conducting a four-stage MR study, potential drug targets for MI were systematically identified, as illustrated in Fig. 1. MR design relies on 3 core assumptions: (1) the direct impact of genetic variants on exposures; (2) the lack of association between genetic variants and potential confounders; and (3) the influence of genetic variants on outcomes occurs solely through their effects on exposures [19]. Utilized in the present study were the summary-level data from publicly available European-descent GWASs for the blood proteome, MI, and 310 non-MI diseases. Approval for the protocol and data collection was granted by the ethics committee of the original GWASs. Written informed consents were obtained prior to the commencement of data collection.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Conceptual framework of Mendelian randomization (MR) study. IVs, instrumental variable; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; MI, myocardial infarction; PRESSO, Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier; ABO, Blood types A, B, and O Blood Typing System; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin, type A1C; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride; Phe-MR, phenome-wide MR.

2.2 Data

This study enrolled a total of 9775 European individuals from 3 large-scale GWASs from which the summary data of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the human proteome, serving as genetic instruments, was obtained (Table 1, Ref. [13, 20, 21]). The analysis conducted by Sun et al. [13] involved 3282 proteins in 3301 participants, utilizing 10,534,735 SNPs from the INTERVAL study. Folkersen et al. [20] analyzed 83 proteins in 3394 participants with 5,270,646 SNPs from the IMPROVE study. Suhre et al. [21] analyzed 1124 proteins in 3080 participants with 501,428 SNPs from the KORA F4 study and the QMDiab assay (Table 1). The Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) GWAS database provided the public databases for the aforementioned proteins (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/).

Table 1.

Characteristics of human blood proteome GWASs used for genetic instruments selection.

Reference Cohort (s) Description Sample size Country Population Number of human blood proteins analyzed Number of SNPs
Sun et al. [13] INTERVAL study randomized trial 3301 England European 3282 10,534,735
Folkersen et al. [20] IMPROVE study multicenter, observational study 3394 Finland, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden European 83 5,270,646
Suhre et al. [21] KORA F4 study population-based cohort 3080 German European 1124 501,428
QMDiab cross-sectional case-control study Qatar
Total 9775 4498 16,306,809

GWASs, genome-wide association studies; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; QMDiab, Qatar Metabolomics Study on Diabetes.

The summary genetic statistics for MI were obtained from the Coronary ARtery DIsease Genome wide Replication And Meta-analysis (CARDIoGRAM) plus C4D investigators and The UK BioBank [22] (Supplementary Table 1). The UK Biobank included 17,505 cases and 454,212 controls with a total of 10,903,881 SNPs. CARDIoGRAM plus C4D included ~44,000 MI cases and ~123,504 controls with a total of 9,289,491 SNPs. Finally, ~61,000 MI cases and ~577,000 controls with 8,126,035 SNPs common to both data sets were obtained [22]. The diagnosis for MI was made by fulfilling any one of the following criteria [23]: (1) An increase and/or decrease in cardiac biomarkers with at least one value surpassing the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit, coupled with evidence of myocardial ischemia. (2) Sudden, unexpected cardiac death, often accompanied by symptoms suggestive of MI and electrocardiogram (ECG) changes indicative of new ischemia. (3) Conditions consistent with perioperative myocardial necrosis and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related/coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related MI. (4) Pathological observations suggestive of an acute MI.

2.3 Genetic Instruments for Blood Proteins

Using MR, we utilized SNPs at a genome significance level of p value < 5 × 10-8. These SNPs were independent of other SNPs (r2 < 0.1) and served as instruments for these proteins. The plasma cis-protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) were considered as instruments. In cases where protein-associated SNPs were not present in the MI dataset, a proxy SNP (r2 > 0.8) was automatically chosen for the MR analysis. Following this, we computed the phenotypic variance explained by each blood protein’s corresponding instruments. To ensure sufficient statistical power, proteins with less than 0.5% variance explained by genetic variants were excluded [24]. Furthermore, we excluded proteins associated with fewer than 3 SNPs since certain MR sensitivity analyses necessitate a minimum of 3 SNPs associated with the exposure [25, 26].

Finally, the MR analysis included a total of 331 unique blood proteins, with 4167 out of the initial 4498 proteins being excluded (Fig. 1). The strength of the genetic instruments for blood proteins was assessed using the F statistic, with a higher F-statistic (F >10) indicating a stronger instrument [27].

2.4 Statistics

In the primary analysis, we employed the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR method to assess the associations between 331 blood proteins and MI [28]. To validate the associations in the primary analysis, we conducted sensitivity analyses, including MR-heterogeneity [29], MR-pleiotropy, MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (PRESSO), and colocalization analysis [30]. MR-heterogeneity (p < 0.05) or Colocalization analysis (PP.H4.abf <80%) suggested the presence of heterogeneity. MR-pleiotropy (p < 0.05) suggested the presence of pleiotropy. We tested the effects of proteins on MI, and then the effects of potential mediations (body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycosylated hemoglobin, type A1C (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglyceride (TG)) using two-step MR [31].

2.5 Phe-MR Analysis

We evaluated potential on-target side effects associated with interventions targeting identified proteins to reduce MI burden, using summary statistics from the FinnGen biobank’s GWAS analysis of 2803 disease traits (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). In this study, representative traits were exclusively chosen to minimize inherent redundancy and, consequently, enhance the quality of the results. Furthermore, exclusion criteria were applied for sex-specific disease traits, disease traits with similar profiles, and disease traits with fewer than 500 cases, respectively. This was done to account for data availability and statistical significance issues. Finally, the Phe-MR analysis included 310 non-MI disease traits to explore potential on-target side effects associated with proteins related to MI (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 2).

In the second stage, a statistically significant association was considered when the observed 2-sided p-value was below 1.51 × 10-4 (Bonferroni-corrected: p = 0.05/331). For stage four, the established threshold for statistical significance in the Phe-MR analysis was p = 0.05/1550 (resulting from the multiplication of 5 identified MI proteins in stage two by 310 diseases) = 3.23 × 10-5 (Bonferroni-corrected). R software (version 4.2.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was employed for all statistical analyses, utilizing packages such as gtx, MendelianRandomization, TwoSampleMR, ggplot2, dplyr, qqman, ggrepel, CMplot, forestploter, coloc, ieugwasr, gwasvcf, gwasglue, and VariantAnnotation.

3. Results

3.1 Strength of the Genetic Instruments for Blood Proteins

In this MR analysis, a total of 331 blood proteins were examined (Supplementary Table 3). The genetic instruments accounted for variance in the proteins ranging from 0.87% to 10.32%. The genetic instruments for the proteins exhibited F statistics ranging from 29.67 to 9926.96, indicating the absence of weak instrument bias (Supplementary Table 3).

3.2 Identification of Causal Proteins for MI from the Blood Proteome

The primary MR analysis investigated the relationships between the risk of MI and 331 blood proteins (Supplementary Table 4). In the principal analysis, genetically determined cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1), Selenoprotein S (SELENOS), killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 2DS2 (KIR2DS2), vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29 (VPS29), and histo-blood group ABO system transferase (NAGAT) demonstrated significant associations with an elevated risk of MI (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 5). Following this, sensitivity analyses including MR-heterogeneity, MR-pleiotropy, colocalization analysis, and MR-PRESSO were performed, as shown in Supplementary Table 6 and Supplementary Table 7.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Circular Manhattan plot illustrating the associations between blood proteins and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI). The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold (p < 0.000151) is depicted by the dashed line, with labels indicating significant proteins. The 331 proteins are grouped and color-coded based on sample size. Results for the associations between proteins and MI can be found in Supplementary Table 5.

In total, 5 proteins with causal implications for the risk of MI were identified (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 7). For these proteins, each standard deviation (SD) increase in genetically determined KIR2DS2 was associated with a lower risk of MI (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90–0.96; p = 1.08 × 10-5), along with VPS29 (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.90–0.94; p = 8.05 × 10-13). In contrast, each SD increase in genetically determined CT-1 (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.13–1.18; p = 1.29 × 10-31), SELENOS (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.13–1.20; p = 4.73 × 10-24), and NAGAT (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.03–1.07; p = 1.41 × 10-5) was associated with a higher risk of MI.

Table 2.

Summary of significant human blood proteins representing causal mediators for MI.

Proteins SNPs Methods beta se OR 95% CI p value
CT-1 3 MR Egger 0.110 0.193 1.116 0.765–1.629 0.6709316
Weighted median 0.145 0.014 1.156 1.125–1.188 2.2435 × 10–⁢25
IVW 0.145 0.012 1.156 1.128–1.184 1.2876 × 10–⁢31
Simple mode 0.177 0.027 1.194 1.133–1.258 0.02213021
Weighted mode 0.135 0.014 1.145 1.113–1.178 0.01129431
SELENOS 3 MR Egger 0.096 0.041 1.101 1.016–1.194 0.256226
Weighted median 0.149 0.016 1.160 1.125–1.197 1.1878 × 10–⁢20
IVW 0.152 0.015 1.164 1.131–1.199 4.7338 × 10–⁢24
Simple mode 0.161 0.032 1.175 1.103–1.251 0.03786816
Weighted mode 0.147 0.016 1.158 1.122–1.196 0.01214628
KIR2DS2 6 MR Egger –0.124 0.037 0.883 0.822–0.949 0.02764757
Weighted median –0.093 0.020 0.911 0.877–0.947 2.3888 × 10–⁢06
IVW –0.075 0.017 0.927 0.897–0.959 1.0796 × 10–⁢05
Simple mode –0.090 0.036 0.914 0.852–0.980 0.05255789
Weighted mode –0.093 0.021 0.911 0.873–0.950 0.00730637
VPS29 3 MR Egger –0.096 0.011 0.909 0.889–0.928 0.07263406
Weighted median –0.086 0.009 0.917 0.901–0.934 6.7061 × 10–⁢22
IVW –0.084 0.012 0.919 0.899–0.941 8.0535 × 10–⁢13
Simple mode –0.091 0.023 0.913 0.873–0.954 0.05643502
Weighted mode –0.087 0.009 0.917 0.900–0.934 0.01171093
NAGAT 3 MR Egger 0.065 0.022 1.067 1.023–1.113 0.2048195
Weighted median 0.048 0.006 1.050 1.038–1.062 2.4082 × 10–⁢16
IVW 0.048 0.011 1.049 1.026–1.072 1.4119 × 10–⁢05
Simple mode 0.018 0.029 1.018 0.962–1.077 0.5990393
Weighted mode 0.050 0.006 1.052 1.039–1.065 0.01494713

Association estimates with the risk of MI per 1-SD increase in CT-1, SELENOS, VPS29, KIR2DS2, and NAGAT are represented by ORs along with their 95% CIs. The significant threshold was established at p < 0.000151. CT-1, cardiotrophin-1; SELENOS, Selenoprotein S; KIR2DS2, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 2DS2; VPS29, vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29; NAGAT, histo-blood group ABO system transferase; MI, myocardial infarction; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MR, mendelian randomization; IVW, inverse-variance weighted.

3.3 Identification of Potential MI Risk Factors

To determine potential mechanisms linking 5 plasma proteins and MI, a two-step mediation MR analysis was conducted for conventional MI risk factors. Initially, two-sample MR analyses were performed to delineate the causal relationships between the MI risk factors and MI itself. The correlation between the screened 5 proteins which we identified from the GWAS and the conventional risk factors of MI were assessed subsequently. For each of the 6 considered MI risk factors (i.e., BMI, FBG, HbA1c, LDL, HDL, and TG). Notably, BMI, HbA1c, LDL, and TG were linked to an increased MI risk, whereas HDL was linked to a decreased MI risk (p ≤ 0.05/6 = 0.0083, Bonferroni adjusted for 6 risk factors). No significant association was found between FBG and MI (p > 0.05) (Supplementary Table 8).

We performed MR of 5 significant Proteins with the 5 MI risk factors (BMI, HbA1c, LDL, HDL, TG). Out of the 5 proteins associated with MI, 4 were identified to be linked with one or more of the risk factors for MI (Supplementary Table 9, Supplementary Fig. 1). BMI and HDL were associated with lower CT-1 levels while LDL was associated with higher CT-1 levels (p ≤ 0.05/(5 × 5) = 0.002). LDL was associated with higher SELENOS levels while HDL was associated with lower SELENOS levels (p ≤ 0.002). HDL and TG was associated with higher VPS29 levels while LDL was associated with lower VPS29 levels (p ≤ 0.002). HDL and LDL was associated with higher NAGAT levels while TG was associated with lower NAGAT levels (p ≤ 0.002).

To determine the indirect impact of proteins on MI outcomes through risk factors, a mediation analysis was conducted, utilizing the effect estimates derived from the two-step MR and the total effect from the primary MR (Supplementary Table 10). The mediator factors were screened by causality relationship analysis among the potential mediators with outcome of MI after the exposure of the five identified proteins. (Supplementary Tables 8,9). The ideal mediator variables are defined by the p-value < 0.05 with the horizontal pleiotropy >0.05, which calculated by IVW and weighted-median methods. it can be observed that BMI and TG meet these criteria. The CT-1-MI effect remained non-significantly altered, ranging from 1.156 (95% CI 1.13, 1.18) to 1.158 (95% CI 1.11, 1.20), after adjusting for the estimated effects of BMI. The SELENOS–MI effect reduced from 1.16 (95% CI 1.13, 1.29) to 1.14 (95% CI 1.09, 1.20) after adjusting for the estimated effects of BMI. The VPS29-MI effect increased from 0.92 (95% CI 0.90, 0.94) to 0.93 (95% CI 0.90, 0.96) after adjusting for the estimated effects of BMI and triacylglycerols. The NAGAT-MI effect reduced from 1.05 (95% CI 1.03, 1.07) to 1.04 (95% CI 1.02, 1.07) with adjustment for the estimated effects of triacylglycerols. However, after adjusting for triacylglycerols, the causal link between KIR2DS2 and MI dissipated (p > 0.05).

3.4 Phe-MR Analysis

A comprehensive Phe-MR analysis was employed to systematically evaluate the effects of the identified MI proteins on the risks associated with 310 non-MI diseases (Supplementary Table 2), aiming to elucidate their potential side-effect profiles. A total of 25 associations reached a threshold of p = 3.23 × 10-5 (calculated as 0.05/1550 [5 proteins × 310 diseases]) (Supplementary Tables 11,12,13,14,15, Fig. 3, Supplementary Figs. 2,3,4,5,6). The results from sensitivity analyses, incorporating heterogeneity and pleiotropy, provided additional validation for the associations identified in the Phe-MR analysis (Supplementary Table 16).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Potential on-target side effects associated with CT-1, SELENOS, VPS29, and NAGAT intervention revealed by Phe-MR analysis. Effect estimates on the risk of multiple non-MI per 10% reduction in risk for MI, achieved by targeting CT-1, SELENOS, VPS29, and NAGAT, are presented as ORs along with their 95% CIs. CT-1, cardiotrophin-1; SELENOS, Selenoprotein S; VPS29, vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29; NAGAT, histo-blood group ABO system transferase; MI, myocardial infarction; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MR, mendelian randomization; Phe-MR, phenome-wide MR; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; DM1, type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Targeting the CT-1, SELENOS, VPS29, and NAGAT revealed a total of 25 significant associations with various non-MI diseases (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 17). In brief, CT-1 had detrimental effects on 4 mental disorders diseases (memory loss; symptoms and signs involving cognition, perception, emotional state and behavior; any mental disorder; Delirium), 1 neurological system disease (Alzheimer’s disease), and 1 endocrine/metabolic disease (disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias), while it had beneficial effects on 3 sense organs disorders (Age-related macular degeneration; Degeneration of macula and posterior pole; Other retinal disorders). SELENOS exhibited harmful effects on 3 circulatory system diseases (Angina pectoris; Coronary atherosclerosis; ischemic heart diseases) and 1 endocrine/metabolic disease (Disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias). VPS29 had beneficial effects on 3 circulatory system diseases (Angina pectoris; Coronary atherosclerosis; ischemic heart diseases), 1 neurological system disease (Alzheimer’s disease), and 1 endocrine/metabolic disease (Disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias), while it had detrimental effects on 1 digestive system disease (Disorders of gallbladder, biliary tract and pancreas). In addition, NAGAT had detrimental effects on 2 circulatory system diseases (Phlebitis and thrombophlebitis (not including deep venous thrombosis (DVT)); Pulmonary heart disease), 2 endocrine/metabolic disease which were associated with type 2 diabetes, and 2 digestive system diseases (Cholelithiasis; Disorders of gallbladder, biliary tract and pancreas).

The associations with the most significant impact were observed in Memory loss (OR per 10% reduction in MI risk: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.51–1.94; p = 2.06 × 10-17) for CT-1, Disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidaemias (OR per 10% reduction in MI risk: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.41–1.58; p = 2.91 × 10-43) for SELENOS, Alzheimer’s disease (OR per 10% reduction in MI risk: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73–0.79; p = 2.52 × 10-54) for VPS29, and Phlebitis and thrombophlebitis (not including DVT) (OR per 10% reduction in MI risk: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.19–1.28; p = 2.22 × 10-28) for NAGAT (Supplementary Table 16).

4. Discussion

By integrating genomics with proteins, the current MR study has offered novel insights into the exploration of promising and safe drug targets for MI. Out of 331 blood proteins examined, we identified 5 proteins with potential causal associations with MI: CT-1, SELENOS, KIR2DS2, VPS29, and NAGAT. Among the 5 identified proteins, KIR2DS2 and VPS29 had protective effects, while CT-1, SELENOS, and NAGAT had detrimental effects on MI. The Phe-MR analysis was carried out to anticipate on-target side effects linked to potential MI treatment through interventions targeting the identified proteins. It was observed that CT-1 exerted adverse effects on 4 mental disorders, 1 neurological system disease, and 1 endocrine/metabolic disease, while it had beneficial effects on 3 sense organs disorders. NAGAT had detrimental effects on 2 circulatory system diseases, 2 endocrine/metabolic diseases which were associated with type 2 diabetes, and 2 digestive system disease. SELENOS had detrimental effects on 3 circulatory system diseases and 1 endocrine/metabolic disease, while VPS29 had beneficial effects on these diseases and 1 neurological system disease. VPS29 had detrimental effects on 1 digestive system disease.

As a member of the gp130 family of cytokines, CT-1 is known for its diverse physiological roles [32]. CT-1 was a key factor in cardiomyocyte maturation and promoted cell survival of serum-deprived neonatal rat cardiomyocytes through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK)1/2 mediated anti-apoptotic pathways [33]. In rats experiencing MI, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, and post-MI conditions, there was an increase in both the mRNA and protein levels of CT-1 [34]. Freed et al. [35] demonstrated that CT-1 fosters the formation of infarct scars by upholding the cellular structure of the scar, consequently enhancing ventricular function. Notably, CT-1 exhibited the ability to restrict myocardial injury even when administered during reoxygenation. Beyond its impacts on the heart, CT-1 exerts significant protective effects on various organs, including the liver, kidneys, and nervous system. Numerous studies have indicated that CT-1 may play a pivotal role in regulating body weight and metabolism [32, 36, 37, 38]. In our study, elevated levels of CT-1 were correlated with a lower BMI and HDL, along with an increased risk of LDL. Analyzing data from a MI GWAS involving 638,717 European participants, our findings revealed a genetically determined higher blood level of CT-1 associated with an increased risk of MI. This suggests that increased levels of CT-1 are linked to a heightened risk of MI. Furthermore, the Phe-MR analysis indicated that CT-1 exhibited adverse effects on four mental disorders, 1 neurological system disease, and 1 endocrine/metabolic disease, while it had beneficial effects on 3 sense organs disorders. Hence, considering the identification of certain adverse side effects through Phe-MR analysis, the application of a therapeutic strategy involving CT-1 for MI prevention and treatment should be approached after a careful evaluation of the pros and cons associated with CT-1.

Excessive inflammation plays a pivotal role in triggering and contributing to cardiovascular disease, making it a significant therapeutic target [39, 40]. The identification of novel biomarkers has enriched our understanding of inflammation, complementing established indicators such as C-reactive protein, interleukins (ILs), and tumor necrosis factor alpha. In a study by Sardu et al. [39], sirtuins, microRNAs, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) protein, apolipoprotein E protein, and adiponectin emerged as promising biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Moreover, these newly identified inflammatory biomarkers offer valuable insights into evaluating the efficacy of treatments in patients with CVD. A study revealed that hyperglycemic ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, in contrast to their normoglycemic counterparts undergoing thrombus aspiration treatment, exhibited elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, specifically tumor necrosis factor-alpha, within coronary artery thrombi [40]. Regarding glycemic control, sodium-dependent glucose transporters 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exhibit the potential to induce a more stable phenotype in coronary atherosclerotic plaques, as evidenced by increased minimum fibrous cap thickness and reduced inflammation and lipid deposition. This beneficial effect is attributed to the improvement of glucose homeostasis and the attenuation of systemic inflammatory burden, as indicated by decreased levels of NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), serum caspase-1, and IL-1β [41].

As participants in the regulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, SELENOS operates as a member of the selenoprotein family [42, 43, 44, 45, 46]. Recent studies have revealed novel histological distributions of SELENOS in the spleen, blood vessels, and serum [47, 48]. Alanne et al. [49] found a higher risk of cardiovascular disease among SELENOS SNP rs8025174 carriers in women (hazard ratio 2.95). In their analysis of the association between 10 types of SELENOS gene polymorphisms and the risk of atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, Cox et al. [50] identified associations between SELENOS SNPs and both subclinical and clinical atherosclerosis. In our study, an association was observed in which elevated levels of SELENOS were linked to lower HDL and an increased risk of LDL. Vascular endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are crucial for cardiovascular homeostasis [51]. A study demonstrated that heightened SELENOS expression enhanced human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) viability and superoxide dismutase activity while reducing H2O2-induced malondialdehyde production [52]. Another study also found that inhibiting SELENOS expression in VSMCs exacerbated cell damage induced by H2O2 or tunicamycin and increased VSMC apoptosis. These results indicated that SELENOS could increase the resistance of HUVECs and VSMCs to oxidative stress [48]. In this MR study, a positive association was identified between genetically determined levels of SELENOS and the risk of MI. Considering the identification of certain adverse side effects through Phe-MR analysis, the application of a therapeutic strategy involving SELENOS for MI prevention and treatment should be approached after a careful evaluation of the pros and cons associated with SELENOS.

KIR2DS2 was one of killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) [53]. Studies reported that there was a higher prevalence of certain activators KIR gene (2DS2 and 2DS4) in subjects with acute ischemic stroke [54], acute coronary syndrome [55, 56] and unstable atherosclerotic plaques [57]. In patients with rheumatoid vasculitis [58] and acute coronary syndrome [59], CD4+CD28-T cells expressing KIR2DS2 in the absence of opposing inhibitory receptors may promote the activation of autoreactive T cells linked to the mechanisms responsible for the instability of atherosclerotic plaques and ischemic neuronal damage. Although the relationship between KIR2DS2 and MI has not been reported, our results suggest that genetically determined higher KIR2DS2 levels are linked to a reduced risk of MI. Consequently, KIR2DS2 may emerge as a promising drug target for preventing and treating MI, devoid of predicted harmful side effects.

Operating within the endolysosomal pathway, the protein complex Retromer, which encompasses VPS35, VPS26, and VPS29, is responsible for the recycling of proteins. Playing a central role as a scaffold, VPS29 coordinates the assembly of retrieval complexes with regulatory components [60]. Research utilizing genetic, cellular, and animal models has linked retrotransposons and their interacting proteins to familial neurodegenerative diseases. Although no relationship between VPS29 and cardiovascular disease has been reported, VPS29 has been shown to be associated with aging. In the investigation conducted by Chu and Praticò [61], it was discovered that the primary components of the retromer recognition core experienced a significant reduction with age in the brain cortices of Tg2576 mice. Aging, a crucial risk factor in the development of MI, is considered to involve the loss of protein homeostasis, a shared characteristic in the pathogenesis of MI. In our investigation, an association was observed between VPS29 and lipid levels, implying that the pathways by which VPS29 influences MI risk may be connected to lipid levels. Further research is required to determine the exact mechanism. Our results suggest that genetically determined elevated VPS29 levels are linked to a reduced risk of MI. Furthermore, the Phe-MR analysis confirmed the previously observed beneficial role of VPS29 in the circulatory system, suggesting it as a novel and promising drug target for preventing and treating MI, with additional protective effects against 5 diseases.

NAGAT lies at the core of the ABO blood group system. This system encompasses 3 carbohydrate antigens: A, B, and H. NAGAT was closely associated with cancer [62]. A MR Analysis about Ischemic Stroke showed that NAGAT was a causal mediator for cardioembolic stroke [24]. In our investigation, an association was established between genetically determined higher NAGAT levels and an increased MI risk, suggesting that elevated levels of NAGAT are linked to an elevated risk of MI. Additionally, our findings demonstrated that higher levels of NAGAT were correlated with elevated LDL. The exact mechanism is unclear. Phe-MR analysis also showed that NAGAT has a detrimental effects on 2 circulatory system diseases, 2 endocrine/metabolic diseases which were associated with type 2 diabetes, and 2 digestive system diseases. Consequently, the application of a therapeutic strategy involving NAGAT for the prevention and treatment of MI should be considered after a thorough evaluation of the pros and cons associated with NAGAT.

The implications of our findings are significant for both public health and clinical practice. MI is as a prominent cause of global mortality. Coronary atherosclerosis, characterized by stable and unstable periods well before the manifestation of overt symptoms, provides a substantial time window for interventions to delay the disease’s progression [23]. Hence, it holds paramount importance to identify key biomarkers that can pinpoint individuals at a heightened risk for circulatory diseases to facilitate the early prevention of MI. The results indicate that certain blood proteins (CT-1, SELENOS, KIR2DS2, VPS29, and NAGAT) have the potential to serve as predictive biomarkers for MI. However, recently, two studies on MR of MI have yielded different findings. Wu et al. [63] identified two proteins, lipoprotein(a) (LPA) and apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5), as potential drug targets for MI, with their causal effects on MI risk. Ye et al. [64] identified seven promising drug targets for intervention in MI (switch-associated protein 70 (SWP70), transgelin-2 (TAGLN2), low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), C1s subcomponent (C1s), apolipoprotein C-III (Apo C-III), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), and angiopoietin-related protein 4 (ANGL4)). The difference in results may be due to the different databases used. Therefore, our study proposes new drug targets that can complement these two studies. As biomarker testing becomes more comprehensive, the discovery of numerous additional drug targets may be discovered. Phe-MR results indicate that biomarkers influencing MI may mediate the risk of numerous non-MI diseases, involving both circulatory and non-circulatory disorders. Notably, certain biomarkers (KIR2DS2, VPS29) predicted the occurrence of potential side-effects which would be beneficial for drug development.

Several factors limit the interpretation and generalizability of the study findings. First, while the MR study incorporated 331 diverse proteins from 3 extensive GWASs through stringent selection criteria, it’s important to note that these proteins represent only a fraction of the total blood proteins. Second, the participants enrolled in this study were exclusively of European ancestry. Although this choice minimizes the potential for spurious associations stemming from population selection bias, it does impose a constraint on extrapolating our findings to non-European populations. Future biomarker GWAS in non-European cohorts are imperative to facilitate trans-ethnic MR analyses, expected to yield more broadly applicable findings. Third, our study data did not include the latest protein GWASs [65, 66, 67] and MI GWAS [68]. Therefore, a further and more comprehensive exploration of potential drug targets for MI is still warranted.

5. Conclusions

In our comprehensive MR study, we employed a systematic approach to unravel the intricate relationships between genetically predicted elevations in specific 5 plasma proteins and the risk of incident MI. Our findings shed light on distinct patterns of association, offering valuable insights for potential interventions and drug targeting. Genetically elevated levels of KIR2DS2 and VPS29 are linked to a decreased risk of MI. Conversely, CT-1, SELENOS, and NAGAT are associated with an increased risk of MI. Notably, KIR2DS2 stands out as a promising target for MI prevention and treatment, with no side effects. Furthermore, VPS29 could also be a viable option. Despite its detrimental effects on 1 digestive system disease, its overall beneficial effects on 5 other diseases underscore its potential as a multifaceted therapeutic target. Further research into the specific mechanisms and pathways involved will be crucial for a more nuanced understanding of these associations and to guide future clinical applications.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506199.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3602400, 2022YFA1104500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (92249301, U22A6008), and the Open Project Program of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease (NCRCG-PLAGH-2022001).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

LW, WZ and FC designed the research study. LW, ZF, and TL performed the research. LW, ZG, and TS analyzed the data. ZF, DH, and YW provided help and on the manuscript draft. DH and YW provided help and advice on the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3602400, 2022YFA1104500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (92249301, U22A6008), and the Open Project Program of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease (NCRCG-PLAGH-2022001).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • [1].Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation . 2014;129:e28–e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FAH, Genest J, Gotto AM, Jr, Kastelein JJP, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. The New England Journal of Medicine . 2008;359:2195–2207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. The New England Journal of Medicine . 2005;352:1685–1695. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Olszewski AJ, Szostak WB. Homocysteine content of plasma proteins in ischemic heart disease. Atherosclerosis . 1988;69:109–113. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(88)90003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Goetzl EJ, Boxer A, Schwartz JB, Abner EL, Petersen RC, Miller BL, et al. Altered lysosomal proteins in neural-derived plasma exosomes in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology . 2015;85:40–47. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Santos R, Ursu O, Gaulton A, Bento AP, Donadi RS, Bologa CG, et al. A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery . 2017;16:19–34. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Hauser AS, Chavali S, Masuho I, Jahn LJ, Martemyanov KA, Gloriam DE, et al. Pharmacogenomics of GPCR Drug Targets. Cell . 2018;172:41–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.033. e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Chen L, Peters JE, Prins B, Persyn E, Traylor M, Surendran P, et al. Systematic Mendelian randomization using the human plasma proteome to discover potential therapeutic targets for stroke. Nature Communications . 2022;13:6143. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33675-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Smith GD, Lawlor DA, Harbord R, Timpson N, Day I, Ebrahim S. Clustered environments and randomized genes: a fundamental distinction between conventional and genetic epidemiology. PLoS Medicine . 2007;4:e352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JAC, Timpson N, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Statistics in Medicine . 2008;27:1133–1163. doi: 10.1002/sim.3034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Ference BA, Majeed F, Penumetcha R, Flack JM, Brook RD. Effect of naturally random allocation to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the risk of coronary heart disease mediated by polymorphisms in NPC1L1, HMGCR, or both: a 2 × 2 factorial Mendelian randomization study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2015;65:1552–1561. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Ference BA, Julius S, Mahajan N, Levy PD, Williams KA, Sr, Flack JM. Clinical effect of naturally random allocation to lower systolic blood pressure beginning before the development of hypertension. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979) . 2014;63:1182–1188. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Sun BB, Maranville JC, Peters JE, Stacey D, Staley JR, Blackshaw J, et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature . 2018;558:73–79. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0175-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Yao C, Chen G, Song C, Keefe J, Mendelson M, Huan T, et al. Genome-wide mapping of plasma protein QTLs identifies putatively causal genes and pathways for cardiovascular disease. Nature Communications . 2018;9:3268. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05512-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Emilsson V, Ilkov M, Lamb JR, Finkel N, Gudmundsson EF, Pitts R, et al. Co-regulatory networks of human serum proteins link genetics to disease. Science (New York, N.Y.) . 2018;361:769–773. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Davey Smith G, Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics . 2014;23:R89–R98. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Smith GD. Mendelian Randomization for Strengthening Causal Inference in Observational Studies: Application to Gene × Environment Interactions. Perspectives on Psychological Science: a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science . 2010;5:527–545. doi: 10.1177/1745691610383505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, Yarmolinsky J, Davies NM, Swanson SA, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement. JAMA . 2021;326:1614–1621. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Emdin CA, Khera AV, Kathiresan S. Mendelian Randomization. JAMA . 2017;318:1925–1926. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Folkersen L, Fauman E, Sabater-Lleal M, Strawbridge RJ, Frånberg M, Sennblad B, et al. Mapping of 79 loci for 83 plasma protein biomarkers in cardiovascular disease. PLoS Genetics . 2017;13:e1006706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Suhre K, Arnold M, Bhagwat AM, Cotton RJ, Engelke R, Raffler J, et al. Connecting genetic risk to disease end points through the human blood plasma proteome. Nature Communications . 2017;8:14357. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Hartiala JA, Han Y, Jia Q, Hilser JR, Huang P, Gukasyan J, et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies novel susceptibility loci for myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal . 2021;42:919–933. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2007;50:2173–2195. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Chong M, Sjaarda J, Pigeyre M, Mohammadi-Shemirani P, Lali R, Shoamanesh A, et al. Novel Drug Targets for Ischemic Stroke Identified Through Mendelian Randomization Analysis of the Blood Proteome. Circulation . 2019;140:819–830. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Pan Y, Li H, Wang Y, Meng X, Wang Y. Causal Effect of Lp(a) [Lipoprotein(a)] Level on Ischemic Stroke and Alzheimer Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Stroke . 2019;50:3532–3539. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade KH, Haberland V, Baird D, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife . 2018;7:e34408. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Burgess S, Thompson SG, CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. International Journal of Epidemiology . 2011;40:755–764. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genetic Epidemiology . 2013;37:658–665. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) . 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Wu F, Huang Y, Hu J, Shao Z. Mendelian randomization study of inflammatory bowel disease and bone mineral density. BMC Medicine . 2020;18:312. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01778-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Richmond RC, Hemani G, Tilling K, Davey Smith G, Relton CL. Challenges and novel approaches for investigating molecular mediation. Human Molecular Genetics . 2016;25:R149–R156. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].López-Yoldi M, Moreno-Aliaga MJ, Bustos M. Cardiotrophin-1: A multifaceted cytokine. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews . 2015;26:523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Sheng Z, Pennica D, Wood WI, Chien KR. Cardiotrophin-1 displays early expression in the murine heart tube and promotes cardiac myocyte survival. Development (Cambridge, England) . 1996;122:419–428. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.2.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Aoyama T, Takimoto Y, Pennica D, Inoue R, Shinoda E, Hattori R, et al. Augmented expression of cardiotrophin-1 and its receptor component, gp130, in both left and right ventricles after myocardial infarction in the rat. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology . 2000;32:1821–1830. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2000.1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Freed DH, Cunnington RH, Dangerfield AL, Sutton JS, Dixon IMC. Emerging evidence for the role of cardiotrophin-1 in cardiac repair in the infarcted heart. Cardiovascular Research . 2005;65:782–792. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].López-Yoldi M, Fernández-Galilea M, Laiglesia LM, Larequi E, Prieto J, Martínez JA, et al. Cardiotrophin-1 stimulates lipolysis through the regulation of main adipose tissue lipases. Journal of lipid research . 2014;55:2634–3643. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M055335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Castaño D, Larequi E, Belza I, Astudillo AM, Martínez-Ansó E, Balsinde J, et al. Cardiotrophin-1 eliminates hepatic steatosis in obese mice by mechanisms involving AMPK activation. Journal of hepatology . 2014;60:1017–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Natal C, Fortuño MA, Restituto P, Bazán A, Colina I, Díez J, et al. Cardiotrophin-1 is expressed in adipose tissue and upregulated in the metabolic syndrome. American journal of physiology . 2008;294:E52–E60. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00506.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Sardu C, Paolisso G, Marfella R. Inflammatory Related Cardiovascular Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Targets. Current Pharmaceutical Design . 2020;26:2565–2573. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200213123029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Sardu C, D’Onofrio N, Mauro C, Balestrieri ML, Marfella R. Thrombus Aspiration in Hyperglycemic Patients With High Inflammation Levels in Coronary Thrombus. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2019;73:530–531. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Sardu C, Trotta MC, Sasso FC, Sacra C, Carpinella G, Mauro C, et al. SGLT2-inhibitors effects on the coronary fibrous cap thickness and MACEs in diabetic patients with inducible myocardial ischemia and multi vessels non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis. Cardiovascular Diabetology . 2023;22:80. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01814-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Walder K, Kantham L, McMillan JS, Trevaskis J, Kerr L, De Silva A, et al. Tanis: a link between type 2 diabetes and inflammation. Diabetes . 2002;51:1859–1866. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.6.1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Fradejas N, Serrano-Pérez MDC, Tranque P, Calvo S. Selenoprotein S expression in reactive astrocytes following brain injury. Glia . 2011;59:959–972. doi: 10.1002/glia.21168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Christensen LC, Jensen NW, Vala A, Kamarauskaite J, Johansson L, Winther JR, et al. The human selenoprotein VCP-interacting membrane protein (VIMP) is non-globular and harbors a reductase function in an intrinsically disordered region. The Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2012;287:26388–26399. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.346775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Gao Y, Feng HC, Walder K, Bolton K, Sunderland T, Bishara N, et al. Regulation of the selenoprotein SelS by glucose deprivation and endoplasmic reticulum stress - SelS is a novel glucose-regulated protein. FEBS Letters . 2004;563:185–190. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00296-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Kim KH, Gao Y, Walder K, Collier GR, Skelton J, Kissebah AH. SEPS1 protects RAW264.7 cells from pharmacological ER stress agent-induced apoptosis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications . 2007;354:127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Hao S, Hu J, Song S, Huang D, Xu H, Qian G, et al. Selenium Alleviates Aflatoxin B₁-Induced Immune Toxicity through Improving Glutathione Peroxidase 1 and Selenoprotein S Expression in Primary Porcine Splenocytes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2016;64:1385–1393. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Ye Y, Fu F, Li X, Yang J, Liu H. Selenoprotein S Is Highly Expressed in the Blood Vessels and Prevents Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells From Apoptosis. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry . 2016;117:106–117. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Alanne M, Kristiansson K, Auro K, Silander K, Kuulasmaa K, Peltonen L, et al. Variation in the selenoprotein S gene locus is associated with coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke in two independent Finnish cohorts. Human Genetics . 2007;122:355–365. doi: 10.1007/s00439-007-0402-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Cox AJ, Lehtinen AB, Xu J, Langefeld CD, Freedman BI, Carr JJ, et al. Polymorphisms in the Selenoprotein S gene and subclinical cardiovascular disease in the Diabetes Heart Study. Acta Diabetologica . 2013;50:391–399. doi: 10.1007/s00592-012-0440-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Schober A, Nazari-Jahantigh M, Wei Y, Bidzhekov K, Gremse F, Grommes J, et al. MicroRNA-126-5p promotes endothelial proliferation and limits atherosclerosis by suppressing Dlk1. Nature Medicine . 2014;20:368–376. doi: 10.1038/nm.3487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Zhao Y, Li H, Men LL, Huang RC, Zhou HC, Xing Q, et al. Effects of selenoprotein S on oxidative injury in human endothelial cells. Journal of Translational Medicine . 2013;11:287. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Lanier LL. NK cell recognition. Annual Review of Immunology . 2005;23:225–274. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Tuttolomondo A, Di Raimondo D, Pecoraro R, Casuccio A, Di Bona D, Aiello A, et al. HLA and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIRs) genotyping in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Journal of Neuroinflammation . 2019;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1469-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Licata G, Tuttolomondo A, Corrao S, Di Raimondo D, Fernandez P, Caruso C, et al. Immunoinflammatory activation during the acute phase of lacunar and non-lacunar ischemic stroke: association with time of onset and diabetic state. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology . 2006;19:639–646. doi: 10.1177/039463200601900320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Tuttolomondo A, Di Sciacca R, Di Raimondo D, Serio A, D’Aguanno G, La Placa S, et al. Plasma levels of inflammatory and thrombotic/fibrinolytic markers in acute ischemic strokes: relationship with TOAST subtype, outcome and infarct site. Journal of Neuroimmunology . 2009;215:84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Nadareishvili ZG, Li H, Wright V, Maric D, Warach S, Hallenbeck JM, et al. Elevated pro-inflammatory CD4+CD28- lymphocytes and stroke recurrence and death. Neurology . 2004;63:1446–1451. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000142260.61443.7c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Martínez-Rodríguez JE, Munné-Collado J, Rasal R, Cuadrado E, Roig L, Ois A, et al. Expansion of the NKG2C+ natural killer-cell subset is associated with high-risk carotid atherosclerotic plaques in seropositive patients for human cytomegalovirus. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology . 2013;33:2653–2659. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Liuzzo G, Kopecky SL, Frye RL, O’Fallon WM, Maseri A, Goronzy JJ, et al. Perturbation of the T-cell repertoire in patients with unstable angina. Circulation . 1999;100:2135–2139. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.21.2135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Baños-Mateos S, Rojas AL, Hierro A. VPS29, a tweak tool of endosomal recycling. Current Opinion in Cell Biology . 2019;59:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Chu J, Praticò D. The retromer complex system in a transgenic mouse model of AD: influence of age. Neurobiology of Aging . 2017;52:32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Zhu J, O’Mara TA, Liu D, Setiawan VW, Glubb D, Spurdle AB, et al. Associations between Genetically Predicted Circulating Protein Concentrations and Endometrial Cancer Risk. Cancers . 2021;13:2088. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Wu J, Fan Q, He Q, Zhong Q, Zhu X, Cai H, et al. Potential drug targets for myocardial infarction identified through Mendelian randomization analysis and Genetic colocalization. Medicine . 2023;102:e36284. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Wang X, Huang T, Jia J. Proteome-Wide Mendelian Randomization Analysis Identified Potential Drug Targets for Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of the American Heart Association . 2023;12:e029003. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Pietzner M, Wheeler E, Carrasco-Zanini J, Cortes A, Koprulu M, Wörheide MA, et al. Mapping the proteo-genomic convergence of human diseases. Science (New York, N.Y.) . 2021;374:eabj1541. doi: 10.1126/science.abj1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Ferkingstad E, Sulem P, Atlason BA, Sveinbjornsson G, Magnusson MI, Styrmisdottir EL, et al. Large-scale integration of the plasma proteome with genetics and disease. Nature Genetics . 2021;53:1712–1721. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00978-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Sun BB, Chiou J, Traylor M, Benner C, Hsu YH, Richardson TG, et al. Plasma proteomic associations with genetics and health in the UK Biobank. Nature . 2023;622:329–338. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06592-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Aragam KG, Jiang T, Goel A, Kanoni S, Wolford BN, Atri DS, et al. Discovery and systematic characterization of risk variants and genes for coronary artery disease in over a million participants. Nature Genetics . 2022;54:1803–1815. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01233-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine are provided here courtesy of IMR Press

RESOURCES