Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2000 Apr 22;320(7242):1119–1123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1119

Ulcerative colitis

Subrata Ghosh 1, Alan Shand 1, Anne Ferguson 1
PMCID: PMC1127254  PMID: 10775225

Ulcerative colitis is a relapsing and remitting disease characterised by acute non-infectious inflammation of the colorectal mucosa. In the United Kingdom the annual incidence is around 7 cases per 100 000 population.1 The rectal mucosa is invariably affected. Confluent inflammation and shallow ulceration extend proximally from the anal margin. A patient may have proctitis, left sided colitis (the proximal limit being below the splenic flexure), extensive colitis (involving the transverse colon), or pan colitis. At any point in time, 50% of patients are asymptomatic, 30% have mild symptoms, and 20% have moderate to severe symptoms.2 Many patients have long periods of complete remission, but the cumulative probability of remaining free from relapse at two years is only 20%, decreasing to less than 5% at 10 years.3 Later relapses generally affect the same region of the colon as previous episodes.

Several of the current clinical and therapeutic issues in ulcerative colitis include: (a) medical treatment options for relapse and for maintenance of remission; (b) management of the minority of patients who develop a severe life threatening relapse or chronic unremitting disease; (c) surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis; and (d) long term complications in patients with extensive disease—namely, colonic and biliary cancers and sclerosing cholangitis.

Summary points

  • Ulcerative colitis may present at any age, but the anatomical distribution of involvement at presentation is different between children and adults

  • All patients with bloody diarrhoea need to have infection excluded

  • Outpatient rigid sigmoidoscopy is the best method of diagnosing the nature of inflammation

  • The extent of inflammation may be established by total colonoscopy (or a double contrast barium enema)

  • The mainstays of treatment are rectal and systemic 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives and corticosteroids, with azathioprine in steroid dependent or resistant cases

  • Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should be considered in every patient in whom colectomy is contemplated

Methods

We have based this review on our clinical and research experience in gut immunology and inflammatory diseases together with information from comprehensive monographs3,4,5 and UK and US guidelines on management.6,7 We also searched Medline from 1985 to July 1999 using the search terms “ulcerative colitis” and “sclerosing cholangitis,” which yielded 6116 and 889 citations respectively and other seminal papers.

Clinical features and diagnosis

Ulcerative colitis may present at any age. Men and women are equally affected. In adults at presentation about 55% have proctitis, 30% left sided colitis, and 15% extensive colitis or pan colitis. In children, only 25% present with proctitis alone, 30% have left sided colitis, and in 45% the disease extends to the transverse colon or beyond.

Box B1 lists typical symptoms at presentation. Virtually all patients with ulcerative colitis have rectal bleeding or bloody diarrhoea. Delays in presentation are common through such diverse reasons as fear of cancer or a general reluctance to discuss matters relating to bowel habit (box B2). Many patients may complain of pain of colonic origin, often left sided and related to defecation. There are no specific clinical signs on general examination, but inflammation of the rectal mucosa (proctitis) can readily be seen at proctoscopy (fig 1).

Box 1.

: Symptoms of ulcerative colitis

Colonic symptoms Extraintestinal
•Diarrhoea with blood and mucus Related to activity of colitis
• Urgency, tenesmus • Peripheral arthritis
• Incontinence • Erythema nodosum
• Lower abdominal cramps and pain with defecation • Iritis, uveitis
Systemic symptoms • Thromboembolism
•Tiredness, weight loss Unrelated to activity of colitis
• Malaise, fever • Sclerosing cholangitis
• Ankylosing spondylitis, sacroileitis
• Pyoderma gangrenosum (see fig A on website)

Box 2.

: Atypical symptoms at presentation or relapse

  • Bleeding not recognised because of colour blindness
  • Constipation proximal to severe proctitis—blood and mucus several times daily, hard stool once or twice a week (olsalazine frequently causes diarrhoea and may be a useful drug)
  • Late stage tubular colon with failure of the capacity to concentrate stool so the patient has watery diarrhoea without inflammation or bleeding
  • Faecal incontinence—at least 50% of patients with diarrhoea due to ulcerative colitis are occasionally incontinent
  • The patient does not recall an earlier episode of colitis but presents with sclerosing cholangitis or colon cancer and dysplasia (even if there are no current symptoms of ulcerative colitis, biopsies usually show evidence of a previous total colitis)
  • Chronic iron deficiency anaemia—usually there is a history of diarrhoea on direct questioning

Figure 1.

Figure 1

 Appearance of rectum in proctitis with erythematous friable mucosa, loss of vascular pattern, and mucopus

Patients with bloody diarrhoea need careful clinical evaluation. After infection has been excluded in patients with colitis the nature and extent of inflammation should be established by sigmoidoscopy and biopsy and either total colonoscopy or double contrast barium enema examination (fig 2). Sedation may be necessary for appraisal of the rectal mucosa in an anxious child presenting for the first time. The patient should be informed that rectal examination and sigmoidoscopy are safe and usually painless and that they are performed routinely at appointments to allow sensible treatment decisions to be made. Sigmoidoscopy may be performed safely during pregnancy if considered essential for management, but never total colonoscopy.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

 Double contrast barium enema showing granularity and continuous involvement with ulcerations

Differential diagnosis

The most difficult decision may be to establish whether the diagnosis is ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. It may be several years after presentation that the clinical evolution allows a firm decision to be made. Fortunately, unless surgery is contemplated the management of colonic Crohn's disease is broadly similar to that of ulcerative colitis. The table summarises the differences between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. In our view these are different diseases. Otherwise the differential diagnosis includes anal fissure (seen with proctoscopy), infectious colitis (stool cultures for bacterial pathogens, and careful examination of stools and biopsy material for viral, parasitic, and protozoal infection are mandatory), and pseudomembranous colitis (history of antibiotic exposure, toxin assay for Clostridium difficile). Food sensitive colitis should be considered in infants8 and ischaemic colitis, diverticulitis, and colonic tumours in adults.

Causal and immunological aspects

The cause remains unresolved, but current interest is focused on defects in the mucous gel barrier, either primary or acquired by bacterial sulphatases,911 low appendicectomy rates in ulcerative colitis12 (even when smoking is controlled for),13 and colonic sulphate reducing bacteria.14 The existence of true autoimmunity in ulcerative colitis is uncertain, and the evidence is conflicting.15,16 The balance between Th1 and Th2 phenotypes of T lymphocytes determines the characteristics of a chronic inflammatory process. Th1 cells secrete proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 2 and γ interferon, whereas Th2 cells express regulatory cytokines such as interleukin 4 and interleukin 10. Th2 responses have been shown to be important in atopy, a condition in which altered humoral immunity is present, and existing data suggest that ulcerative colitis more closely resembles a Th2 type disease.17

Management

Analysis of the patient's illness

As in many chronic diseases, an appropriate plan of management must be tailored to the patient's current anatomical, functional, and “disease activity” status. Anatomical extent of grossly affected colon, symptomatic disease activity, local and remote complications, iatrogenic illnesses, nutrition, growth variables, social and psychological factors, and coexistent diseases should all be considered within a comprehensive management strategy.

Symptoms are the best guide towards disease activity18 and their relief is the main treatment aim. It may be difficult to decide whether remission has been achieved, and this is a major problem in the design of clinical trials. Various clinical indices have been devised, mainly based on subjective data. The Powell-Tuck index19 is widely employed and is of particular use in clinical trials where objective, reproducible assessment of symptoms is vital. In practice, the Crohn's disease activity index20 gives similar values to the Powell-Tuck index (see fig B on website). Symptoms may remit but endoscopically there may still be evidence of mucosal inflammation; histology often remains abnormal long after complete clinical remission. Blood tests indicating inflammatory activity, such as platelet and leucocyte counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or concentrations of C reactive protein, although a useful adjunct, often merely confirm the overall clinical impression. A new objective measure of gut inflammation (gut protein loss measured by lavage fluid from the whole gut) measures the same symptomatic, acute inflammatory component of overall illness as the Crohn's disease activity index, both in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in adults (see fig C on website).21 Tests based on whole gut lavage offer a different approach for assessing the contribution of “disease activity” to overall illness, as well as measuring the efficacy of treatment.

Medical treatment of typical relapse

In practice, rectal and systemic derivatives of 5-aminosalicylic acid and corticosteroids form the basis of medical treatment (see table on website). Azathioprine may be used as a steroid sparing agent. There is little to choose between the various 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations available. The use of sulphasalazine, the oldest (and least expensive) of these, has become less popular because of side effects including nausea, skin rashes, and reversible oligospermia. Balsalazide, a colonic release preparation that is azo bonded may be more effective and better tolerated than mesalazine.22 Topical treatment is usually effective for proctitis. Patients may need to be taught how to use formulations given through the rectum. Rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations and corticosteroids are both effective in relieving symptoms and inducing remission but the former is more effective.23 Patients tolerate foam enema preparations better than liquid enemas,24 but the new mesalazine gel enema may be better still.25

There is no evidence that elemental diets or other dietary intervention have any specific therapeutic effect in ulcerative colitis. However, the support of a dietician in the management of patients is invaluable for monitoring daily nutritional intake and educating patients on the principles of good nutrition. Many patients are iron deficient and may require supplementation with oral iron preparations. Parenteral iron or recombinant human erythropoietin26 has been used in cases where oral supplements are poorly tolerated.

Maintenance of remission

Since attacks recur, maintenance treatment is important. Sulphasalazine and the 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations are equally effective,27 but the 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations are better tolerated. Intolerance to 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs occurs in about 10% of patients.28 All 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations are potentially nephrotoxic and so regular monitoring of renal function is mandatory.29 In patients with steroid resistant or dependent disease, immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine may maintain remission. Though the evidence supporting the use of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis is weaker than that in Crohn's disease, a recent survey confirmed its widespread use by British gastroenterologists.30

Medical treatment of severe disease

Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment. These may be given orally or intravenously, usually in a daily dose of 60-80 mg methylprednisolone intravenously, or 40-60 mg prednisolone orally. The dose and form of corticosteroids used are not fully backed up by dose ranging trials in severe disease. Where corticosteroids are ineffective several alternative treatments have been tried. Noticeable clinical improvement has been reported in patients treated with intravenous unfractionated heparin.31,32 Cyclosporin, given intravenously (4 mg/kg)33 or orally (4-9 mg/kg) has proved successful in inducing remission—for example, in a paediatric series 11 of 14 children responded.34 Even lower doses may be effective, with fewer side effects. In many instances, however, colectomy is only delayed and not prevented—seven of these cases needed colectomy within a year. The trend currently is to induce remission with cyclosporin and to maintain this with an immunosuppressive drug such as azathioprine. Over half of patients on this regimen may avoid colectomy in the longer term.35 Avoiding colectomy, even for a short period, can be beneficial to some patients by providing time to think about surgery or allowing an elective rather than an emergency procedure. We believe that cyclosporin has a place in managing severe ulcerative colitis, a view supported by recent quality of life data.36 Such treatment should, however, be confined to specialist centres.

The excellent results of, effectively curative, surgical treatment must always be taken into account when deciding whether to prolong medical treatment.

Failure of medical management and indications for surgery

Proctocolectomy or colectomy with rectal preservation may be an emergency procedure in fulminant colitis or toxic megacolon. More often, however, the procedure is elective after failure of medical treatment either through a lack of efficacy or unacceptable side effects (see fig D on website). Rarely, in a patient with long standing colitis, colectomy is necessary because of the development of severe dysplasia or carcinoma of the colonic epithelium. Until recently, surgical treatment implied permanent ileostomy, a prospect unacceptable to many patients. Now, advances in surgical technique have allowed the creation of an ileal reservoir or pouch, and with ileoanal anastomosis the need for permanent ileostomy is diminishing. Restorative surgery of this nature should be considered in every patient. Because of a child's small pelvis it may be technically advisable to delay pouch surgery until the mid teens, but often the best functional results after pouch surgery are seen in children.37 Continent ileostomy has little use but may be considered in patients with existing conventional ileostomy or in pouch failures.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and pouchitis

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir has revolutionised surgery for ulcerative colitis, and with increasing confidence the indications have been widened to include those with more limited but refractory disease.38 Pouchitis, a non-specific inflammation of the ileal reservoir, is the most frequent long term complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. This poorly understood condition may occur in up to one third of patients within 5 years of surgery, with two thirds of these having recurrent episodes.3941 Though faecal stasis is a popular explanation of the cause of pouchitis, no difference in the faecal concentrations of bacteria, bile acids, and short chain fatty acids has been reported between patients with or without pouchitis. Complex interactions between an immunologically susceptible mucosa, faecal stasis, and bacterial flora merit further investigation. Metronidazole is an effective first line treatment. In pregnant patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, delivery by caesarean section should be considered as sphincter damage may be detrimental to pouch function. Though fertility is not reduced in ulcerative colitis in itself, postoperative fertility may be reduced after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in women of childbearing age.42

Malignancy complicating ulcerative colitis

Disease duration of more than eight years and disease extent proximal to the sigmoid colon are the two major determinants of increased risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis (box B3). Coexistent primary sclerosing cholangitis also increases the risk.43 Screening for dysplasia by colonoscopy at regular intervals (1-2 years) remains the only feasible method for surveillance (fig 3). End points such as surgery must be understood by the patient before entering a surveillance programme. The limitations of colonoscopy as well as alternative options (colectomy after 10 years of extensive disease) need to be discussed in detail. Detection of dysplasia is an imperfect science and other reliable markers of a premalignant stage are needed. p53 mutations,44 Ki-ras,45 Ki-67, and sialosyl-Tn are among some of the candidates being evaluated.

Box 3.

: Risk factors for malignancy in ulcerative colitis

  • Longstanding disease of more than 8 years
  • Extensive colitis
  • Sclerosing cholangitis
  • Family history of colon cancer
  • Expression of sialosyl-Tn antigen in mucosal biopsies
  • ? Onset in childhood and adolescence

Figure 3.

Figure 3

 Highly dysplastic mass lesion in caecum of patient with ulcerative colitis of 12 years' duration

Sclerosing cholangitis in ulcerative colitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is the commonest form of chronic liver disease associated with ulcerative colitis and may be present in 2-7%of patientsdepending on how diligently it is sought.46 Primary sclerosing cholangitis associated with ulcerative colitis is twofold more common in men than women. The ulcerative colitis affects the entire colon in 90% of patients but symptoms are often mild. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is the best method of confirming the diagnosis, but magnetic resonance cholangiography is likely to become the non-invasive diagnostic method of choice. Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies may be detectable in serum.47 Medical treatment with agents such as corticosteroids, colchicine, penicillamine, and ursodeoxycholic acid has not been shown to retard progression of liver disease.48 Endoscopic treatment may be beneficial in selected patients with dominant extrahepatic biliary strictures.49 Progressive cholestatic jaundice with liver failure and development of cholangiocarcinoma are the two fatal consequences of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Orthotopic liver transplantation is the only treatment available to patients with advanced liver disease.50 It is important to continue surveillance colonoscopy after liver transplantation to detect colonic dysplasia.51

Conclusion

The diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis remain a challenge to clinicians. Rigorous epidemiological study of the negative relations between ulcerative colitis, smoking habit, and appendicectomy may yield further clues to the cause of this condition. Most patients can be managed wholly as outpatients. Symptomatic relapses are the rule, however, and so maintenance treatment with oral 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations is important to keep these to a minimum. Most have distal disease that is amenable to topical application of 5-aminosalicylic acid or corticosteroid preparations, and many patients will begin self treatment with these at the first signs of a flare up. The overall prognosis in ulcerative colitis is good, and with the exception of the first year of diagnosis when the risk of colectomy is statistically highest there is no significant excess in mortality.

Supplementary Material

[extra: Additional datails]

Table.

Differences between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Ulcerative colitis Crohn's disease
Disease features
Smoking Non-smokers or ex-smokers Smokers
Long latent period No Yes
Genetic susceptibility +; HLA class II ++; non-major histocompatibility complex
Osteopenia at diagnosis No Yes
Oral and perianal disease No Yes
Growth failure ± ++
Anatomy of involvement Colon Entire gut; rectal sparing
Histology and immunology
Granuloma, stricture, fistula Generally no Yes
Transmural inflammation No Yes
Cytokines Increased interleukin 4 and interleukin 5; normal γ interferon and interleukin 12 Normal interleukin 4 and interleukin 5; increased γ interferon and interleukin 12
Associated autoimmune diseases Yes No
Mucosal IgG subclass IgG1 IgG2
Autoantibodies +++ +
Management
Response to antibiotics No Yes
Nutritional therapy Not effective Effective
Maintenance with 5-aminosalicylic acid Effective Small benefit
Ileoanal pouch Yes Generally no
Recurrence after surgery No (apart from pouchitis) Yes
Extraintestinal manifestations
Sclerosing cholangitis +++ +
Autoimmune hepatitis +++ +

±=Equivocal association; +=weakly associated; ++=moderately well associated; +++ strongly associated.

Footnotes

graphic file with name bmjcom.f1.gifAdditional details appear on the BMJ's website

References

  • 1.Probert CS, Jayanthi V, Pinder D, Wicks AC, Mayberry JF. Epidemiological study of ulcerative proctocolitis in Indian migrants and the indigenous population of Leicestershire. Gut. 1992;33:687–693. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.5.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hendriksen C, Kreiner S, Binder V. Long term prognosis in ulcerative colitis based on results from a regional group from the county of Copenhagen. Gut. 1985;26:158–163. doi: 10.1136/gut.26.2.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Allan RN, Rhodes JM, Hanauer SB, Keighley MRB, Alexander-Williams J, Fazio VW. Inflammatory bowel disease. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Targan SR, Shanahan F. Inflammatory bowel disease: from bench to bedside. Maryland: Williams and Wilkins; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Korelitz BI, Sohn N. Management of inflammatory bowel disease. St Louis, MI: Mosby Year Book; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines in gastroenterology 4. Inflammatory bowel disease. BSG; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kornbluth A, Sachar DB. Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:204–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Machida HM, Catto Smith AG, Gall DG, Trevenen C, Scott RB. Allergic colitis in infancy: clinical and pathologic aspects. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1994;19:22–26. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199407000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pullan RD, Thomas GA, Rhodes M, Newcombe RG, Williams GT, Allen A, et al. Thickness of adherent mucus gel on colonic mucosa in humans and its relevance to colitis. Gut. 1994;35:353–359. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.3.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tysk C, Riedesel H, Lindberg E, Panzini B, Podolsky D. Colonic glycoproteins in monozygotic twins with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:419–423. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90211-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tsai HH, Dwarakanath AD, Hart CA. Increased faecal mucin sulphatase activity in ulcerative colitis: a potential target for treatment. Gut. 1995;36:570–576. doi: 10.1136/gut.36.4.570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rutgeerts P, D'Hans G, Hiele M, Geboes K, Vantrappen G. Appendectomy protects against ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1994;106:1251–1253. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dijkstra B, Bagshaw PF, Frizelle FA. Appendectomy protects against ulcerative colitis even when controlling for cigarette smoking. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:334–336. doi: 10.1007/BF02236349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pitcher MCL, Cummings JH. Hydrogen sulphide—a bacterial toxin in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1996;39:1–4. doi: 10.1136/gut.39.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Das KM, Dasgupta A, Mandal A, Geng X. Autoimmunity to cytoskeletal protein tropomyosin. A clue to the pathogenetic mechanisms for ulcerative colitis. J Immunol. 1993;150:2487–2493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cantrell M, Prindiville T, Gershwin ME. Autoantibodies to colonic cells and subcellular fractions in inflammatory bowel disease: do they exist? J Autoimmun. 1990;3:307–320. doi: 10.1016/0896-8411(90)90149-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mosman TR, Sad S. The expanding universe of T-cell subsets—Th1, Th2 and more. Immunol Today. 1996;17:38–46. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(96)80606-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis. Final reports on a controlled trial. BMJ. 1955;ii:1041–1048. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4947.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Powell-Tuck J, Bown RL, Lennard-Jones JE. A comparison of oral prednisolone given as a single or multiple daily doses for active proctocolitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1978;13:833–837. doi: 10.3109/00365527809182199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern F. Development of a Crohn's disease activity index: national cooperative Crohn's disease study. Gastroenterology. 1976;70:439–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Acciuffi S, Ghosh S, Ferguson A. Strengths and limitations of the Crohn's disease activity index, revealed by an objective gut lavage test of gastro-intestinal protein loss. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996;10:321–326. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-0673.1996.00321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hanauer SB. Balsalazide led to greater remission rates and tolerance than mesalamine in acute ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1999;44:455. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.4.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marshall JK, Irvine EJ. Rectal corticosteroids versus alternative treatments in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 1997;40:775–781. doi: 10.1136/gut.40.6.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Somerville KW, Langman MJ, Kane SP, MacGilchrist AJ, Watkinson G, Salmon P. Effect of treatment on symptoms and quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis: comparative trial of hydrocortisone acetate foam and prednisolone 21 phosphate enemas. BMJ. 1985;291:866. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6499.866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gionchetti P, Ardizzone S, Benvenuti ME, Bianchi Porro G, Biasco G, Cesari P, et al. A new mesalazine gel enema in the treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13:381–388. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schreiber S, Howaldt S, Schnoor M, Nikolaus S, Bauditz J, Gasche C, et al. Recombinant erythropoietin for the treatment of anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:619–623. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603073341002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nilsson A, Danielsson A, Lofberg R, Benno P, Bergman L, Fausa O, et al. Olsalazine versus sulphasalazine for relapse prevention in ulcerative colitis: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:381–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Courtney MG, Nunes DP, Bergin CF, O'Driscoll M, Trimble V, Keeling PW, et al. Randomised comparison of olsalazine and mesalazine in prevention of relapses in ulcerative colitis [see comments] Lancet. 1992;339:1279–1281. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91601-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thuluvath PJ, Ninkovic M, Calam J, Anderson M. Mesalazine induced interstitial nephritis. Gut. 1994;35:1493–1496. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.10.1493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stack WA, Williams D, Stevenson M, Logan RF. Immunosuppressive therapy for ulcerative colitis: results of a nationwide survey among consultant physician members of the British Society of Gastroenterologists. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13:569–575. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Evans RC, Shim-Wong V, Morris AI, Rhodes JM. Treatment of corticosteroid resistant ulcerative colitis with heparin—a report of 16 cases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11:1037–1040. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00252.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gaffney PR, Doyle CT, Gaffney A, Hogan J, Hayes DP, Annis P. Paradoxical response to heparin in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:220–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lichtiger S, Present DH, Kornbluth A, Gelernt I, Bauer J, Galler G, et al. Cyclosporine in severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroid therapy. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1841–1845. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406303302601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Treem WR, Davis PM, Justinich CJ, Hyams JS. Cyclosporine for the treatment of fulminant ulcerative colitis in children: immediate response, long-term results, and impact on surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:474–479. doi: 10.1007/BF02148846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stack WA, Long RG, Hawkey CJ. Short- and long-term outcome of patients treated with cyclosporin for severe acute ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12:973–978. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cohen RD, Brodsky AL, Hanauer SB. A comparison of the quality of life in patients with severe ulcerative colitis after total colectomy versus medical treatment with intravenous cyclosporin. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1999;5:1–10. doi: 10.1097/00054725-199902000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kelly KA. Anal sphincter saving operations for chronic ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg. 1992;163:5–11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90244-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Seidel SA, Peach SE, Newman M, Sharp KW. Ileoanal pouch procedures: clinical outcomes and quality of life assessment. Am Surg. 1999;65:40–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Luukkonen P, Jarvinen H, Tanskanen M, Kahri A. Pouchitis—recurrence of the inflammatory bowel disease? Gut. 1994;35:243–246. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mignon M, Settler C, Phillips SF. Pouchitis—a poorly understood entity. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:100–103. doi: 10.1007/BF02053868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stahlberg D, Gullberg K, Liljeqvist L, Hellers G, Lofberg R. Pouchitis following pelvic pouch operation for ulcerative colitis. Incidence, cumulative risk and risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:1012–1018. doi: 10.1007/BF02054692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Olsen KA, Joelsson M, Laurberg S, Oresland T. Fertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in women with ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 1999;86:493–495. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brentnall TA, Haggitt RC, Rabinovitch PS, Kimmey MB, Bronner MP, Levine DS, et al. Risk and natural history of colonic neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:331–338. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8566577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lashner BA, Shapiro BD, Husain A, Goldblum JR. Evaluation of the usefulness of testing for p53 mutations in colorectal cancer surveillance for ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:456–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.877_f.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Holzmann K, Klump B, Borchard F, Hsieh CJ, Kuhn A, Gaco V, et al. Comparative analysis of histology, DNA content, p53 and Ki-ras mutations in colectomy specimens with long-standing ulcerative colitis. Int J Cancer. 1998;76:1–6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980330)76:1<1::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Olsson R, Danielsson A, Jarnerot G, Lindstrom E, Loof L, Rolny P, et al. Prevalence of primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:1319–1323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Roozendaal C, Van Milligen de Wit AW, Haagsma EB, Horst G, Schwarze C, Peter HH, et al. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in primary sclerosing cholangitis: defined specificities may be associated with distinct clinical features. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;105:393–399. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00294-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mitchell SA, Chapman RWG. Review article: the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11:33–43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.91263000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee JG, Schutz SM, England RE, Leung JW, Cotton PB. Endoscopic therapy of sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 1995;21:661–667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Narvin S, Roberts JP, Emond JC, Lake J, Ascher NL. Liver transplantation for sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 1995;22:451–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Loftus EV, Jr, Aguilar HI, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Krom RA. ZinsmeisterAR, et al. Risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis following orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1998;27:685–690. doi: 10.1002/hep.510270308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[extra: Additional datails]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES