Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2000 Jun 24;320(7251):1725. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1725

Benefits of a cooperative

Alexander Williams
PMCID: PMC1127487  PMID: 10864556

In common with many parts of the United Kingdom the GPs in the Exeter area have formed a cooperative for out of hours cover. This means that 95 doctors have joined together to provide out of hours medical cover to a large population (over 200 000). This system has many advantages to its members, but I found another one while doing my shift recently.

I was asked to visit a man in a nearby town who was complaining of epigastric pain and vomiting. Having decided subconsciously that he probably had gastric flu that was doing the rounds in Exeter, I thought that a quick dose of prochlorperazine would rectify the situation.

He was aged 61 and suffered from polycythaemia and hypercholesterolaemia, but he seemed quite well. Examination was unremarkable apart from a bradycardia of 60, abdominal examination was completely normal, and in particular he had no epigastric tenderness. I was happy to explain the bradycardia as a vasovagal response to his vomiting, was reaching for my prescription pad for antiemetics and antacids when a sudden though crossed my mind—could this be a cardiac problem?

This is when the advantage of being in a cooperative comes into play; both cars are fully equipped with resuscitation facilities and a defibrillator. A relative was dispatched to ask the driver to bring in the equipment and in no time at all we had the standard limb leads attached to the patient and there were the tell tale signs of an acute inferior myocardial infarction. We administered aspirin and called for an ambulance to take him to hospital.

This could have been an easy diagnosis to miss and it made me feel good about myself, but without the defibrillators would I have just given him the antacids?

Footnotes

We welcome articles of up to 600 words on topics such as A memorable patient, A paper that changed my practice, My most unfortunate mistake, or any other piece conveying instruction, pathos, or humour. If possible the article should be supplied on a disk. Permission is needed from the patient or a relative if an identifiable patient is referred to. We also welcome contributions for “Endpieces,” consisting of quotations of up to 80 words (but most are considerably shorter) from any source, ancient or modern, which have appealed to the reader.


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES