Abstract
A nested case-control study of lung cancer among men exposed to ink mist in newspaper production with rotary letterpress technology is presented. It is based within a historical cohort of 9232 printing workers in Manchester (1949-63). Men who operated newspaper rotary letterpress machines had a lung cancer standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 179 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 144-218) when compared with rates for England and Wales for the follow up period 1950-83. When adjustment was made for the higher rates in the local area, the SMR was reduced to 122 (95% CI 98-148). The nested case control study was based on 110 lung cancer cases (1949-86) and 316 matched controls. Duration of work in a rotary letterpress machine room was positively associated with risk of lung cancer (chi 2 linear trend = 3.30, p = 0.07); mean with 30 or more years duration of exposure had a risk of 1.73 (95% CI 0.94-3.17), relative to those with less than 20 years of exposure. Adjustment for period of first exposure in a machine room reduced the strength of the positive duration effect. The magnitude of the SMRs found in the cohort study could be explained by confounding with smoking. The duration effect seen in the case-control study, however, suggests that there may be a real effect of exposure to letterpress ink mists. This is biologically plausible, as benzo[a]pyrene, a known human carcinogen, has been found in appreciable concentrations in the atmosphere of rotary letterpress machine rooms.
Full text
PDF







Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Asp S. Confounding by variable smoking habits in different occupational groups. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984 Oct;10(5):325–326. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casey P., Hagger R., Harper P. A collaborative study of 'ink mist' in U.K. newspaper press-rooms. Ann Occup Hyg. 1983;27(2):127–135. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/27.2.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coggon D., Pannett B., Acheson E. D. Use of job-exposure matrix in an occupational analysis of lung and bladder cancers on the basis of death certificates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984 Jan;72(1):61–65. doi: 10.1093/jnci/72.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DUNN J. E., Jr, WEIR J. M. CANCER EXPERIENCE OF SEVERAL OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS FOLLOWED PROSPECTIVELY. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1965 Sep;55:1367–1375. doi: 10.2105/ajph.55.9.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Decoufle P. Further analysis of cancer mortality patterns among workers exposed to cutting oil mists. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1978 Oct;61(4):1025–1030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn J. E., Jr, Weir J. M. A prospective study of mortality of several occupational groups. Special emphasis on lung cancer. Arch Environ Health. 1968 Jul;17(1):71–76. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1968.10665192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldstein D. H., Benoit J. N., Tyroler H. A. An epidemiologic study of an oil mist exposure. Arch Environ Health. 1970 Nov;21(5):600–603. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1970.10667302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenberg M. A proportional mortality study of a group of newspaper workers. Br J Ind Med. 1972;29(1):15–20. doi: 10.1136/oem.29.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HENDRICKS N. V., COLLINGS G. H., DOOLEY A. E., GARRETT J. T., RATHER J. B., Jr A review of exposures to oil mist. Arch Environ Health. 1962 Feb;4:139–145. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1962.10663137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammond E. C., Selikoff I. J., Lawther P. L., Seidman H. Inhalation of benzpyrene and cancer in man. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;271:116–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb23100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kay K. Toxicologic and cancerogenic evaluation of chemicals used in the graphic arts industries. Clin Toxicol. 1976;9(3):359–390. doi: 10.3109/15563657608988137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leon D. A. Mortality in the British printing industry: a historical cohort study of trade union members in Manchester. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Feb;51(2):79–86. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.2.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd J. W., Decoufle P., Salvin L. G. Unusual mortality experience of printing pressmen. J Occup Med. 1977 Aug;19(8):543–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malker H. S., Gemne G. A register-epidemiology study on cancer among Swedish printing industry workers. Arch Environ Health. 1987 Mar-Apr;42(2):73–82. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1987.9935799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menck H. R., Henderson B. E. Occupational differences in rates of lung cancer. J Occup Med. 1976 Dec;18(12):797–801. doi: 10.1097/00043764-197612000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moss E., Scott T. S., Atherley G. R. Mortality of newspaper workers from lung cancer and bronchitis 1952-66. Br J Ind Med. 1972;29(1):1–14. doi: 10.1136/oem.29.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paganini-Hill A., Glazer E., Henderson B. E., Ross R. K. Cause-specific mortality among newspaper web pressmen. J Occup Med. 1980 Aug;22(8):542–544. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198008000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riddell G. L. The structure of the printing industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 1973 Aug;16(2):141–149. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/16.2.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues L., Kirkwood B. R. Case-control designs in the study of common diseases: updates on the demise of the rare disease assumption and the choice of sampling scheme for controls. Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Mar;19(1):205–213. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.1.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schoenberg J. B., Stemhagen A., Mason T. J., Patterson J., Bill J., Altman R. Occupation and lung cancer risk among New Jersey white males. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 Jul;79(1):13–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siemiatycki J., Wacholder S., Dewar R., Cardis E., Greenwood C., Richardson L. Degree of confounding bias related to smoking, ethnic group, and socioeconomic status in estimates of the associations between occupation and cancer. J Occup Med. 1988 Aug;30(8):617–625. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198808000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
