Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1994 Feb;51(2):136–138. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.2.136

Indirect validation of a retrospective method of exposure assessment used in a nested case-control study of lung cancer and silica exposure.

M Dosemeci 1, J K McLaughlin 1, J Q Chen 1, F Hearl 1, M McCawley 1, Z Wu 1, R G Chen 1, K L Peng 1, A L Chen 1, S H Rexing 1, et al.
PMCID: PMC1127919  PMID: 8111462

Abstract

Validations of retrospective methods of assessment used in occupational epidemiological studies have rarely been published. This study is an indirect validation of a quantitative retrospective assessment of exposure to silica used in a nested case-control study of lung cancer among workers at 29 metal mines and pottery factories in China. Indices of cumulative total dust and cumulative respirable dust were calculated by merging work histories with the historical exposure profile for each subject. To validate indirectly the methods of exposure assessment used in the study of lung cancer, trends for exposure response relation between the two indices of exposure to silica and risk of silicosis were evaluated with 376 patients with silicosis from the study population as the cases, and 1262 controls without silicosis for comparison. Age adjusted odds ratios (ORs) as a measure of risk of silicosis showed striking trends with both indices of exposure to silica. For cumulative respirable dust, the OR (95% confidence interval) rose from 7.6 (5.1-11.4) for low exposure to 20.0 (13.2-30.6) for medium exposure, and to 51.7 (31.0-86.8) for high exposure. The strength of the association between exposure to silica and risk of silicosis suggests that the retrospective assessment of exposure used in the case-control study of lung cancer would accurately reflect an exposure response relation between silica and lung cancer, if it existed.

Full text

PDF
136

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahlborg G. A., Jr Validity of exposure data obtained by questionnaire. Two examples from occupational reproductive studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990 Aug;16(4):284–288. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baumgarten M., Siemiatycki J., Gibbs G. W. Validity of work histories obtained by interview for epidemiologic purposes. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Oct;118(4):583–591. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blair A., Stewart P. A. Do quantitative exposure assessments improve risk estimates in occupational studies of cancer? Am J Ind Med. 1992;21(1):53–63. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700210108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bond G. G., Bodner K. M., Sobel W., Shellenberger R. J., Flores G. H. Validation of work histories obtained from interviews. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Aug;128(2):343–351. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourbonnais R., Meyer F., Theriault G. Validity of self reported work history. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Jan;45(1):29–32. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brisson C., Vézina M., Bernard P. M., Gingras S. Validity of occupational histories obtained by interview with female workers. Am J Ind Med. 1991;19(4):523–530. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700190409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ciccone G., Vineis P. Inter-rater agreement in the assessment of occupational exposure to herbicides. Med Lav. 1988 Sep-Oct;79(5):363–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cloutier Y., Lagier F., Cartier A., Malo J. L. Validation of an exposure system to particles for the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Chest. 1992 Aug;102(2):402–407. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.2.402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coggon D., Pippard E. C., Acheson E. D. Accuracy of occupational histories obtained from wives. Br J Ind Med. 1985 Aug;42(8):563–564. doi: 10.1136/oem.42.8.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldberg M. S., Siemiatycki J., Gérin M. Inter-rater agreement in assessing occupational exposure in a case-control study. Br J Ind Med. 1986 Oct;43(10):667–676. doi: 10.1136/oem.43.10.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hertzman C., Teschke K., Dimich-Ward H., Ostry A. Validity and reliability of a method for retrospective evaluation of chlorophenate exposure in the lumber industry. Am J Ind Med. 1988;14(6):703–713. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700140609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Joffe M. Validity of exposure data derived from a structured questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Mar 1;135(5):564–570. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Järvholm B., Sandén A. Estimating asbestos exposure: a comparison of methods. J Occup Med. 1987 Apr;29(4):361–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kromhout H., Oostendorp Y., Heederik D., Boleij J. S. Agreement between qualitative exposure estimates and quantitative exposure measurements. Am J Ind Med. 1987;12(5):551–562. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700120509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lerchen M. L., Samet J. M. An assessment of the validity of questionnaire responses provided by a surviving spouse. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Mar;123(3):481–489. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Linet M. S., Stewart W. F., Van Natta M. L., McCaffrey L. D., Szklo M. Comparison of methods for determining occupational exposure in a case-control interview study of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Occup Med. 1987 Feb;29(2):136–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McLaughlin J. K., Chen J. Q., Dosemeci M., Chen R. A., Rexing S. H., Wu Z., Hearl F. J., McCawley M. A., Blot W. J. A nested case-control study of lung cancer among silica exposed workers in China. Br J Ind Med. 1992 Mar;49(3):167–171. doi: 10.1136/oem.49.3.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pershagen G., Axelson O. A validation of questionnaire information on occupational exposure and smoking. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1982 Mar;8(1):24–28. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rona R. J., Mosbech J. Validity and repeatability of self-reported occupational and industrial history from patients in EEC countries. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Sep;18(3):674–679. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.3.674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosenberg C. R., Mulvihill M. N., Fischbein A., Blum S. An analysis of the validity of self reported occupational histories using a cohort of workers exposed to PCBs. Br J Ind Med. 1987 Oct;44(10):702–710. doi: 10.1136/oem.44.10.702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Siemiatycki J., Dewar R., Richardson L. Costs and statistical power associated with five methods of collecting occupation exposure information for population-based case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Dec;130(6):1236–1246. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stewart W. F., Tonascia J. A., Matanoski G. M. The validity of questionnaire-reported work history in live respondents. J Occup Med. 1987 Oct;29(10):795–800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Teschke K., Hertzman C., Dimich-Ward H., Ostry A., Blair J., Hershler R. A comparison of exposure estimates by worker raters and industrial hygienists. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989 Dec;15(6):424–429. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ulfvarson U. Validation of exposure information in occupational epidemiology. Am J Ind Med. 1992;21(1):125–132. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700210115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES