Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2024 Mar 18;37(4):633–642. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00005

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Method to Measure Aflatoxin B1 DNA Adducts in Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded Tissues

Medjda Bellamri 1,2, Lihua Yao 1, Rachana Tomar 3, Vladimir Vartanian 4, Carmelo J Rizzo 3, Michael P Stone 3, John D Groopman 5, R Stephen Lloyd 4, Robert J Turesky 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC11279702  NIHMSID: NIHMS2008383  PMID: 38498000

Abstract

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a potent human liver carcinogen produced by certain molds, particularly Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus, which contaminate peanuts, corn, rice, cottonseed, and ground and tree nuts, principally in warm and humid climates. AFB1 undergoes bioactivation in the liver to produce AFB1-exo-8,9-epoxide, which forms the covalently bound cationic AFB1-N7-guanine (AFB1-N7-Gua) DNA adduct. This adduct is unstable and undergoes base-catalyzed opening of the guanine imidazolium ring to form two ring-opened diastereomeric 8,9-dihydro-8-(2,6-diamino-4-oxo-3,4-dihydropyrimid-5-yl-formamido)-9-hydroxy-aflatoxin B1 (AFB1-FapyGua) adducts. The AFB1 formamidopyrimidine (Fapy) adducts induce G → T transversion mutations and are likely responsible for the carcinogenic effects of AFB1. Quantitative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods have shown that AFB1-N7-Gua is eliminated in rodent and human urine, whereas ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua adducts persist in rodent liver. However, fresh frozen biopsy tissues are seldom available for biomonitoring AFB1-DNA adducts in humans, impeding research advances on this potent liver carcinogen. In contrast, formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens used for histopathological analysis are often accessible for molecular studies. However, ensuring nucleic acid quality presents a challenge due to incomplete reversal of formalin-mediated DNA crosslinks, which can preclude accurate quantitative measurements of DNA adducts. In this study, employing ion trap or high-resolution accurate Orbitrap mass spectrometry, we demonstrate that ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua adducts formed in AFB1-exposed newborn mice are stable to the formalin fixation and DNA de-crosslinking retrieval processes that we have established. The AFB1-FapyGua adducts can be detected at levels comparable to those levels in matching fresh frozen liver. Orbitrap MS2 measurements can detect AFB1-FapyGua at a quantification limit of 4.0 adducts per 108 bases when assaying only 0.8 μg DNA on the column. Thus, our breakthrough DNA retrieval technology can be adapted to screen for AFB1-DNA adducts in FFPE human liver specimens from cohorts at risk of this potent liver carcinogen.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2008383-f0004.jpg

Introduction

AFB1 is produced by several strains of Aspergillus, mostly A. flavus and A. parasiticus, which can grow on foods and contaminate peanuts, corn, rice, cottonseed, ground and tree nuts, especially in the warm and humid climates of Eastern and Southeastern Asia, Central America, and sub-Saharan Africa.1,2 Consumption of foods contaminated with AFB1 is an established potent risk factor associated with elevated frequencies of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified AFB1 as a Group 1 carcinogen.2 Epidemiological data demonstrate that ingestion of foods contaminated with aflatoxin-producing molds, along with concomitant acute and chronic hepatitis infections and drinking water contaminated with microcystins, are well-correlated with early onset HCC, with males being preferentially susceptible to tumor formation.2 Even with large-scale disease prevention strategies such as mass vaccination against hepatitis B and increased quality control measures to minimize aflatoxin exposures, AFB1 remains a contributor to hepatocellular carcinogenesis worldwide, affecting upward of 800,000 deaths each year.3 Regulatory agencies in many countries have established limits on the acceptable levels of aflatoxin in food and feed products to protect public health; however, exposure to this deadly carcinogen still occurs.

The bioactivation of AFB1 occurs predominantly by CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 oxidation in the liver,4 generating the 8,9-exo- and endo-epoxides (Scheme 1). The exo-epoxide reacts at the N7 atom of Gua to form the trans-8,9-dihydro-8-(N7-guanyl)-9-hydroxy-aflatoxin B1 adduct (AFB1N7-Gua) in DNA.57 The cationic AFB1-N7-Gua adduct is labile and undergoes spontaneous depurination to generate an abasic site or decomposes by a second route involving base-catalyzed opening of the guanine imidazolium ring, yielding 8,9-dihydro-8-(2,6-diamino-4-oxo-3,4-dihydropyrimid-5-yl-formamido)-9-hydroxy-aflatoxin B1 (AFB1-FapyGua).8 AFB1-FapyGua exists as a number of interconverting species, which include E/Z geometric isomers of the formamide group, aR/aS atropisomers about the C5-N6-bond, and α/β anomer of the glycosidic bond. Structural studies demonstrated AFB1-FapyGua prefers the α-anomeric configuration in single-strand DNA but the β-anomer in duplex DNA (Scheme 1).9 The AFB1-FapyGua DNA adducts are more persistent than AFB1-N7-Gua in vivo and are thought to be the dominant lesions responsible for the genotoxicity of AFB1.10,11 AFB1 DNA adducts induce G → T transversion mutations in Escherichia coli, mammalian cells, and rodent models with the ring-opened Fapy adducts being more mutagenic than AFB1N7-Gua adduct.12,13 The α-AFB1-Fapy-dG adduct strongly blocks replication, whereas the minor β-form is primarily responsible for the G →T mutations and 6-fold more mutagenic than AFB1-N7-Gua.12 Ensuing studies employing high-fidelity DNA sequencing showed that mutational spectra generated from the liver DNA of male mice following AFB1 exposure mirrored those of human liver tumors of individuals exposed to this carcinogen, further revealing the critical role of AFB1 in human liver carcinogenesis.14

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

The bioactivation of AFB1 and the reactivity of the AFB1 exo-8,9 epoxide with DNA to form AFB1-N7-Gua, and ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua diastereomers, and abasic site formation.

DNA adduct measurements provide critical information about human exposure to genotoxic chemicals and can be employed to elucidate mechanisms of carcinogen bioactivation, DNA damage, chemoprevention, and repair.15 DNA adducts can serve as biomarkers for interspecies comparisons of the biologically effective dose of procarcinogens and permit extrapolation of genotoxicity data from animal studies for human risk assessment.16,17

AFB1 DNA adducts are commonly assayed following acid treatment of DNA, where AFB1-N7-Gua and AFB1-FapyGua are released from the DNA backbone by hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond; the AFB1-FapyGua base exist as an equilibrium mixture of the aS- (minor) and aR-atropisomers (major) (Scheme 1) which separate by reversed-phase HPLC.9 (Footnote: We refer to these atropisomers as aS-AFB1-FapyGua and aR-AFB1-FapyGua, (Reference 9, and Eliel, E.L.; Wilen, S.H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1994; p 1120) instead of cis- (minor) and trans-AFB1-FapyG (major) previously used to denote these diastereomers). AFB1-N7-Gua has been measured in human urine by HPLC with UV detection following monoclonal antibody affinity purification,18,19 and more recently by triple quadrupole mass spectrometry employing 15N-labeled AFB1-N7-Gua as an internal standard.20 The ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua adducts were also detected in the urine of AFB1-exposed rats.21 The AFB1 DNA adduct measurements in rodent liver were performed following isolation and acid treatment of DNA, recovering AFB1-N7-Gua and the diastereomeric ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua adducts (Scheme 1).11,22 Recent studies reported the simultaneous quantification of AFB1N7-Gua, aS-AFB1-FapyGua and aR-AFB1-FapyGua in mouse liver DNA by triple quadrupole mass spectrometry employing each isotopically 15N-labeled internal standard.23,24

A major challenge in human DNA adduct biomarker research is the paucity of fresh frozen tissue. However, archived, formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues with clinical diagnoses for the disease are often accessible for chemical analyses. We recently established a method to efficiently reverse formalin-mediated crosslinks of DNA in FFPE tissues under mild conditions, allowing for quantitative measurements of DNA adducts formed with aristolochic acid-I, aromatic amines, heterocyclic aromatic amines, nicotine-derived nitrosamine ketone (NNK), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogens.25,26 This breakthrough technology paves the way for advancing DNA adduct biomarker research with human FFPE tissues.25,26 In this study, we show that ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua adducts are stable towards the FFPE and DNA retrieval processes in the newborn mouse model.11 We employed isotopically labeled AFB1-[15N5]-FapyGua that were site-specifically synthesized in an 11-mer oligodeoxynucleotide as the internal standards.9,24

A key advantage of using the 11-mer AFB1-Fapy-[15N5]-dG as the internal standard over the AFB1-[15N5]-FapyGua nucleobase is that the AFB1-Fapy-[15N5]-dG in the oligodeoxynucleotide_undergoes the same acid hydrolysis chemistry as the DNA samples to produce AFB1-FapyGua and thus, compensates for variations in sample processing conditions, allowing for accurate DNA adduct quantification. AFB1-FapyGua adducts in FFPE mouse liver DNA are recovered at comparable levels to those in matching fresh frozen samples. With further refinements, our technology can screen for AFB1 DNA adducts in archived FFPE human specimens, exploring the impact of genetic polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolism and DNA repair enzymes in AFB1-DNA adduct formation and carcinogenesis.11,27

Materials and Methods.

Gentra Puregene DNA isolation kits were purchased from Qiagen (Valencia, California). Z-Fix buffered zinc formalin 10% was from Anatech Ltd. (Battle Creek, MI). HLB 30 mg cartridges were from Waters (Milford, MA). Optima LC-MS formic acid, water, methanol, acetonitrile were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). The Z-Fix buffered zinc formalin 10% was from Anatech Ltd. (Battle Creek, MI). The FFPE plus LEV DNA Purification kit was from Promega Maxwell (Madison, WI). AFB1 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). The AFB1 epoxide was synthesized as described.10 Caution: AFB1 is a potent human liver carcinogen and should be handled in a well-ventilated hood with appropriate lab clothing and gloves. The AFB1 epoxide should also be handled with the same precautions and lab safety measures. An unmodified 11-mer oligodeoxynucleotide with the sequence 5′-(CCATCGCTACC)-3′, (G = [15N5]G or G) was synthesized on a PerSeptive Biosystem model 8909 DNA synthesizer on a 1 μmol scale using Expedite reagents (Glen Research, Sterling, VA) with the standard synthetic protocol for the coupling of the unmodified bases and 15N5-deoxyguanosine phosphoramidite as described.9 The AFB1 epoxide was reacted with unlabeled and 15N-labeled oligodeoxynucleotides to form the AFB1-FAPY-Gua adducts. The purification, UV spectroscopy, and mass spectral characterization of the unlabeled and 15N5-labelled AFB1-FapyGua oligodeoxynucleotides were reported.9,24 A molar extinction coefficient of 18,000 at 368 nm was used to determine the concentrations of the AFB1-Fapy-dG 11-mer oligodeoxynucleotides.8,28

Animals and dosing.

The breeding and care of Neil1 knockout mice was performed using pre-approved protocols through the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and monitored by the Department of Comparative Medicine. Male and female newborn Neil1−/− mice backcrossed (19 generations) into a C57Bl6 background were mated. The 6-day-old pups were weighed and then given an intraperitoneal injection of freshly reconstituted AFB1 in (DMSO) (10 mmol/L) at a 7.5 mg/kg dose or with DMSO only. The pups were returned to their original cages, and after 48 h were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation followed by decapitation. Livers were immediately harvested and cut into two sagittal sections. One section was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The second section was immersed in formalin cups containing 20 vol of Z-Fix buffered zinc formalin 10% (20 mL) for 24 h. Thereafter, the tissues were placed in a tissue processor, followed by serial washes of the tissue with increasing percentages of ethanol in water, followed by washing with xylene at 42 °C, before embedding in paraffin, at the Histology Core, University of Minnesota.29,30 The tissues were stored in the paraffin blocks in the dark at room temperature (up to 2 years) until used for DNA adduct measurements.

DNA isolation from fresh frozen and FFPE mouse liver tissues.

Frozen mouse liver (20 mg) was homogenized in 2 mL of TE buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 10 mM EDTA containing 10 mM βME) using a blade homogenizer (Pro Scientific, Oxford, CT). The homogenates were centrifuged at 3000g at 4 °C for 10 min. The nuclei pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-EDTA buffer, pH 8.0, containing 10 mM EDTA, and digested with RNase A and RNase T1 for 90 min, followed by proteinase K treatment for 3 h at 37 °C.25 The proteins were removed by the addition of chilled Puregene protein precipitation solution, and DNA was precipitated by adding 0.1 vol of 5 M NaCl followed by 2 vol of isopropanol as described.26

The mouse liver FFPE specimens were dissected from the paraffin block, and the bulk of the paraffin was removed with a scalpel. The tissues were submerged in p-xylene and then underwent serial rehydration with ethanol and increasing percentages of water, followed by homogenization and centrifugation at 3000g to obtain the nuclear pellet.30,31 The rehydrated mouse liver specimens (the equivalent of 20 mg of rehydrated tissue) were incubated for 16 h at 50 °C in the manufacturer’s lysis buffer with proteinase K to reverse the formalin-mediated crosslinks. The DNA was isolated using Maxwell® 16 FFPE plus LEV DNA Purification kit with Promega Maxwell 16 MDx system (Madison, WI), following the manufacturer’s protocols with minor modifications as described.29,30 The DNA concentration was measured by UV absorbance at 260 nm (an absorbance of 1.0 corresponds to 50 μg of double-stranded DNA). The UV spectra ratio of 260 and 280 nm absorbances was ~1.80 to 1.85 and considered high-purity DNA.31 The DNA was further characterized by HPLC with UV detection following nuclease digestion.25 All four canonical 2′-deoxynucleosides were recovered in high yield with no detection of incompletely digested oligodeoxynucleotides, and monitoring for guanosine revealed that RNA contamination was <1% (Figure S1). Thus, the recovered DNA was largely devoid of formalin-mediated crosslinks and high purity.

DNA hydrolysis and recovery of AFB1-FapyGua adducts.

The DNA samples (5 μg) were dissolved in 100 μL of 0.1 N HCl in Eppendorf safe-lock tubes. The equivalent of 5 adducts per 108 nts of total AFB1-[15N5]-FapyGua 11-mer oligodeoxynucleotide containing aR/aS-AFB1-Fapy-dG forms were added to the samples and heated at 95 °C for 1 h. After cooling, the DNA hydrolysate was neutralized with 100 μL of 0.1 N NaOH and processed by solid phase extraction (SPE) with a Waters HLB 30 mg resin. The HLB resin was prewashed with LC-MS grade MeOH with 0.1% HCO2H (2 × 1 mL), then with LC-MS grade 90% H2O/10% CH3OH/0.1% HCO2H (2 × 1 mL). The DNA hydrolysates were applied to the resin, washed with 90% H2O/10% MeOH/0.1% HCO2H (2 × 1 mL), and manually eluted with 1 mL of CH3OH/0.1% HCO2H and vacuum centrifuged to dryness in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. The DNA hydrolysate extracts were reconstituted in 95% 0.1% HCO2H/5% CH3CN (25 μL).

Calibration curves.

The calibration curves were constructed for aS-AFB1-FapyGua (minor) and aR-AFB1-FapyGua (major) isomers in calf thymus (CT) DNA, serving as the background DNA matrix. The single-stranded 11-mer containing AFB1-Fapy-15N5-labeled-dG diastereomers was added to the CT DNA (5 μg) at 5 adducts per 108 DNA bases. The relative amount of the aS-AFB1-FapyGu to aR-AFB1-FapyGua was 15.1 ± 0.2% in the unlabeled 11-mer and 15.3 ± 0.1% in the labeled oligodeoxynucleotides following acid hydrolysis (vide infra). The single-stranded 11-mer containing AFB1-Fapy-dG was added to the CT DNA at eight calibrant levels ranging from 0 up to per 1.54 adducts per 106 bases for the minor aS-AFB1-FapyGua, and up to 8.46 adducts per 106 bases for the major aR-AFB1-FapyGua adduct. The equivalent of 0.8 μg equivalent of DNA hydrolysate was assayed, and each calibration level was done in triplicate. The linear regression was performed using ordinary least squares with equal weightings. The regression curves were plotted as the observed AFB1-FapyGua adduct versus the calculated levels.

Nanoflow Liquid Chromatographic and Mass Spectrometric Analysis of DNA Adducts by Velos Ion Trap MS3.

Ion trap MS3 with the Velos Pro (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) was conducted with an UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano UHPLC System and Easy-Spray Flex ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). The chromatography was done by direct injection. The analytical column was a Prontosil C18AQ reversed-phase column (0.1 × 150 mm, 3 μm particle size, 100 Å pore size) from Michrom, Auburn, CA. The A and B solvents were (A) 0.01% HCO2H in H2O and (B) 0.01% HCO2H in 95% CH3CN. DNA hydrolysate (0.8 μg equivalent of DNA hydrolysate, 4 μL) was assayed by direct injection. The chromatography was done at a flow rate of 1 μL/min and commenced at 5% B for 4 min. Thereafter, the gradient increased to 50% at 12 min and then to 95% B at 13 min and held at 95% B for 3 min, followed by a 1.0 min gradient to 5% B with a 7 min equilibration before commencing a new analysis. The source parameters were as follows: ion transfer tube temperature, 250 °C; spray voltage, 2250 V (positive ion mode); S-lens RF level%, 70. The analysis was conducted at the MS3 scan stage. The maximum injection time was 50 ms. The isolation widths were m/z 4.0 and 1.0, respectively, for the MS2 and MS3 scan events. The MS transitions were m/z 498.1 → 480.1 → for AFB1-FapyGua and 503.1 → 485.1 → for AFB1-[15N5]-FapyGua. The normalized collision energies were 25% and 30%, and the activation Q was 0.25 and 0.4 for MS2 and MS3 scan events, respectively. The activation times were 10 ms for both scan events. The data were acquired in centroid mode by Xcalibur version 3.0.

Nanoflow Liquid Chromatographic and Mass Spectrometric Analysis of DNA Adducts by Orbitrap MS2.

AFB1-FapyGua analysis was performed using the same UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano UHPLC systems interfaced with an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). Chromatography was performed with a Premier LC-MS Magic3 C18AQ column (50 μm × 200 mm, 3 μm particle size, 100 Å) interfaced to a nano Easy-Spray Flex ion source. The LC solvents were (A) 0.01% HCO2H in H2O and (B) 0.01% HCO2H in 95% CH3CN. The DNA hydrolysate extract (0.8 μg equivalent of DNA, 4 μL) was injected onto a Thermo Acclaim PepMap trap cartridge RP C18 (0.3 × 5 mm, 5 μm particle size, 100 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), which was then washed with solvent A at a 12 μL/min flow rate for 2 min. After trapping, the adducts were back-flushed onto the analytical column at a flow rate of 0.5 μL/min and run for 4 min at 1% B. The gradient linearly increased to 40% B at 10 min, and then the flow rate decreased to 0.15 μL/min at 11.0 min. The gradient increased linearly from 40% at 11 min to 99% B at 19.0 min. The column was held for 1.5 min at 99% B at a flow rate of 0.5 μL/min, followed by a 1.5 min gradient to 1% B with a 6 min equilibration before commencing a new analysis. The source parameters were as follows: ion transfer tube temperature, 275 °C; spray voltage, 2200 V (positive ion mode); RF-lens, 59%; quadrupole isolation; m/z isolation width (m/z 3); normalized AGC 600%; injection time 246 ms; normalized CID collision energy 20%; CID activation time 10 ms; activation Q 0.25; Orbitrap detection, 30,000 resolution full width at half maximum (FWHM) at m/z 200. Extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) for AFB1-FapyGua [M+H]+ m/z 498.1 → 480.1150 and 452.1201 and AFB1-[15N5]-FapyGua [M+H]+ m/z 503.1 → 485.1002 and 457.1052, attributed to the losses [M+H–H2O]+ and 457.1052 [M+H–H2O-CO]+ were plotted with a 10 ppm mass tolerance. The data were acquired in profile mode by Xcalibur version 4.4.

Results and Discussion.

This study aimed to determine if ring-opened AFB1-Fapy-dG adducts were stable towards the formalin-fixation-paraffin-embedding and the de-crosslinking procedures and if the DNA recovered from FFPE specimens could be used for quantitative AFB1-DNA adduct measurements. The cationic AFB1-N7-Gua was not detected and likely underwent depurination or hydrolysis to the AFB1-FapyGua adducts during the FFPE or the DNA isolation procedure, which required proteinase K treatment at 50 °C for 16 h to reverse the DNA crosslinks fully. Therefore, we focused on the AFB1-FapyGua adducts, which are more persistent lesions than the cationic AFB1-N7-Gua adduct, as seen in rodents.11,22

Internal standards, Limits of Quantification, Calibration Curves, and Method Performance.

Labeled AFB1-[15N5]Fapy-dG and unlabeled AFB1-Fapy-dG 11-mer oligodeoxynucleotides (250 pg oligodeoxynucleotide spiked in 5 μg CT DNA) underwent acid hydrolysis at 95 °C for 1 h, followed by neutralization and SPE (vide supra). The relative amounts of aS- and aR-AFB1-FapyGua diastereomers were determined with the Orbitrap at the LC/MS2 scan stage as described above. The EIC signals were integrated for the unlabeled and 15N5-labeled adduct AFB1-FapyGua adducts using the transitions m/z 498.1 → 480.1150 and 452.1201 and m/z 503.1 → 485.1002 and 457.1052, respectively. The relative amount of the aS-AFB1-FapyGua to aR-AFB1-FapyGua was 15.1 ± 0.2% in the unlabeled 11-mer and 15.3 ± 0.1% in the labeled oligodeoxynucleotides after acid hydrolysis (4 independent measurements); these differences were not statistically significant. The 11-mer internal standard was added to DNA at 5 AFB1-[15N5]FapyGua adducts per 106 bases. Thus, the level for the minor aS-AFB1-Fapy[15N5]Gua internal standard was 0.77 adducts per 106 bases, and the major aR-AFB1-Fapy[15N5]Gua form was 4.23 adducts per 106 bases.

The calibration curves had a goodness-of-fit regression value of r2 ≥ 0.998 for the Velos and the Lumos MS instruments (Supporting information, Figures S2 and S3). The limit of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) values for the Velos ion trap were set at 3σ and 10σ SD units above the mean background level signal by plotting the data as absolute adduct values compared to the background signals in the fortified CT DNA hydrolysates.32 The LOQ values of the aS-AFB1-FapyGua and aR-AFB1-FapyGua adducts were ~8 adducts per 108 DNA bases at the MS3 scan stage on the Velos when assaying 0.8 μg of DNA hydrolysate obtained from fresh frozen and FFPE tissues. The LOD and LOQ levels with the high-resolution Orbitrap MS-based instrument at the MS2 scan stage are impacted by the number of scans acquired across the peak, and often, there are no measurable or sporadic background signals approaching the LOD. Therefore, the LOQ values for both AFB1-FapyGua diastereomers were set at a signal ten-fold above the background with a minimum of 10 scans across the peaks. The LOQ values of the aS-AFB1-FapyGua and aR-AFB1-FapyGua adducts were estimated at 4.0 adducts per 108 bases when assaying 0.8 μg of DNA hydrolysate on the column on the Orbitrap. Increasing the amount of DNA assayed by 2-fold lowered the quantification limits of the Orbitrap LC/MS2 assay to ~2.5 adducts per 108 bases with 1.6 μg DNA assayed. (unpublished observations, M. Bellamri and R. Turesky). Further improvements in sensitivity might be achieved by optimizing the SPE conditions to remove ion suppressive components or by chemical derivatization of AFB1-FapyGua with xylene-quaternary ammonium cationic-based tagging reagents, which significantly increase signals of response of some adducts.33

The performance of the analytical method is summarized in Table 1. Mouse liver DNA samples were pooled from fresh frozen and FFPE samples to have enough DNA for three independent hydrolyses and AFB1-FapyGua measurements over 3 days. The intraday % coefficient of variations (% CV) were ≤ 10.0%, and the inter-day % CV was ≤ 15.4% for both adducts on both MS instruments. The mean DNA adduct levels of the fresh frozen DNA samples were about ~20% higher than for FFPE samples in this set of pooled DNA samples, signifying that the ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua adducts are stable towards the formalin fixation and de-crosslinking processes. Our previous data reported for DNA adducts of the 2′-deoxynucleoside DNA adducts aristolochic acid, 4-aminobiphenyl, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, and benzo[a]pyrene recovered from matching freshly frozen and FFPE rodent or human tissues were within 20% of each other on average.25,26,34

Table 1.

AFB1-FapyGua DNA adduct measurement reproducibility in fresh frozen and FFPE rat liver.b

Analyte Tissue MS Instrument Statistics Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Intra-day CV (%) Inter-day CV (%)
aS-AFB1-FapyGua (minor) Fresh Velos mean 0.55 0.44 0.54 10.0 15.1
SD 0.07 0.04 0.04

FFPE Velos mean 0.42 0.43 0.42 7.7 7.1
SD 0.04 0.03 0.02

aS-AFB1-FapyGua (minor) Fresh Lumos mean 0.69 0.60 0.64 6.0 8.7
SD 0.04 0.03 0.04

FFPE Lumos mean 0.58 0.47 0.54 8.7 12.6
SD 0.03 0.07 0.05

aR-AFB1-FapyGua (major) Fresh Velos mean 3.69 3.14 2.98 8.0 14.3
SD 0.16 0.10 0.37

FFPE Velos mean 3.05 2.60 2.54 6.6 11.0
SD 0.12 0.31 0.10

aR-AFB1-FapyGua (major) Fresh Lumos mean 4.06 3.23 3.26 6.7 15.4
SD 0.27 0.09 0.26

FFPE Lumos mean 3.31 2.63 2.71 5.3 14.1
SD 0.13 0.19 0.12
a

DNA adducts are reported as adducts per 106 bases, (mean and standard deviation (SD) with three independent replicates assayed per day. The Velos ion trap data were acquired at the MS3 scan stage, and the Orbitrap data were acquired at the MS2 scan stage.

Analysis of AFB1-FapyGua in fresh frozen and FFPE mouse liver DNA.

The measured AFB1-FapyGua adduct levels in the liver of 7 newborn mice employing the Velos ion trap with multistage MS3 scanning and Orbitrap at the MS2 scan stage are reported in Figure 1. Similar to previous studies, the aR-AFB1-FapyGua was the predominant isomer, occurring at ~5 to 7-fold higher levels than the aS-AFB1-FapyGua.23,24 The levels of adducts recovered from fresh frozen and FFPE specimens were generally within 20% for most liver samples. Some minor differences in adduct levels between the Velos ion trap and Orbitrap MS were observed, particularly for the aS-AFB1-FapyGua in mouse livers ML2 and ML3, which were about 3-fold above LOQ values on the Velos. The adduct level measurements of ML2 and ML3 were about 1.8-folder lower on the Orbitrap. These differences may be attributed to the Orbitrap’s higher mass accuracy and precision, where measurements were conducted at 30,000 resolution with a 10 ppm mass tolerance compared to the nominal mass resolution of the Velos ion trap MS, where background isobaric product ions may have inflated the adduct levels. We note that the adduct measurements acquired on the Orbitrap were done three months after those obtained on the Velos. Overall, the adduct level measures are in good agreement between both MS instruments. Representative Velos ion trap LC/MS3 EIC and MS3 product ion spectra of the ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua diastereomers acquired from FFPE mouse liver DNA from an untreated control mouse and AFB1-treated mouse DNA are shown in Figure 2. A representative Lumos Orbitrap LC/MS2 EIC and MS2 and MS3 product ion spectra AFB1-FapyGua diastereomers are shown in Figure 3. The proposed fragmentation of AFB1-FapyGua using CID at the MS2 and MS3 scan stages with the Lumos Orbtrap are shown in Figure S4.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

aS-AFB1-FapyGua and aR-AFB1-FapyGua adduct measurements in AFB1-treated newborn mice 48 h post-treatment with the (A) Velos Ion Trap and (B) Lumos Orbitrap MS. Data are reported as the mean and standard deviation (n = 3 independent analyses per mouse). ML1 is an untreated control mouse liver DNA sample. *P < 0.05 (unpaired t-test).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) LC/MS3 EIC traces of an untreated FFPE negative control and AFB1-treated mouse liver DNA samples. The AFB1-[15N5]Fapy-dG 11-mer was added at a level of 5 adducts per 106 DNA bases, with the minor aS-AFB1-[15N5]FapyGua recovered at a level of 0.77 adducts per 106 bases and the major aR-AFB1-[15N5]FapyGua recovered at 4.23 adducts per 106 bases, following acid hydrolysis. The elution times are aS-AFB1-FapyGua (tR: 7.1 min) and aR-AFB1-FapyGua (tR: 7.4 min). The adduct signals are normalized to the base peak of the aR-AFB1-[15N5]FapyGua. (B) MS3 product ion spectra of aS-AFB1-FapyGua, aR-AFB1-FapyGua, and their internal standards (lower panel). The equivalent of 0.80 μg DNA hydrolysate was assayed by the Velos Ion Trap MS. NL is the normalized ion counts.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A) LC/MS2 EIC traces of an untreated FFPE negative control and AFB1-treated mouse liver DNA samples. The AFB1-[15N5]Fapy-dG 11-mer was added at a level of 5 adducts per 106 DNA bases, with minor aS-AFB1-[15N5]FapyGua recovered at a level of at 0.77 adducts per 106 bases and the major aR-AFB1-[15N5]FapyGua recovered at 4.23 adducts per 106 bases, following acid hydrolysis.. The elution times are aS-AFB1-FapyGua (tR:12.4 min) and aR-AFB1-FapyGua (tR: 13.4 min). (B) MS2 and MS3 product ion spectra of aR-AFB1-FapyGua, and its internal standard. The equivalent of 0.80 μg DNA hydrolysate was assayed by the Orbitrap Lumos MS. NL is the normalized ion counts.

The cationic AFB1-N7-Gua undergoes rapid deglycosylation from rodent liver DNA, whereas the ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua adduct is more persistent.10,11,22 Brown and coworkers predicted that the β-anomeric AFB1-FapyGua should be the principal AFB1 lesion in human genomic DNA since the major α-anomer form is cytotoxic and blocks cell replication.9,12 The long-term persistence and biochemical fate of AFB1-FapyGua diastereomers in rodent or human liver tumors has not been investigated using specific and quantitative LC-MS-based methods. Putative AFB1-FapyGua adducts have been detected in liver biopsy samples of patients with HCC by immunohistochemistry (IHC),3537 and putative AFB1 adducts were detected in rat liver tumors more than 1 year post-AFB1-dosing by IHC,38 suggesting AFB1-FapyGua adducts are highly persistent. However, the chemical identities of these lesions are unknown; they could be altered chemical structures of the AFB1-FapyGua adducts or possibly other components in the liver that cross-react with the antibody.

As far as we are aware, there are no existing data in the literature reporting quantitative mass spectrometry measurements of AFB1-FapyGua adducts in human liver tissue. The IHC studies imply the presence of AFB1-FapyGua at levels exceeding one adduct per 106 nucleotides;3537 however, the accuracy of these findings is uncertain due to potential issues with antibody specificity. Consequently, it is plausible that the actual level of DNA adducts may be lower than indicated by these studies. The sensitivity and quantification limits of our nanoflow LC high-resolution accurate Orbitrap MS2 method are 50 to 100-fold lower than that reported by IHC. It is vital to cross-characterize AFB1 DNA adducts by IHC and specific LC-MS-based methods to confirm DNA adduct identity in human tissues. Our technology established and validated in this study provides a quantitative method for measuring AFB1-FapyGua adducts in human FFPE liver tissue.

In previous studies, we successfully recovered high-quality, fully nuclease-digestible DNA, ranging from 2.5 to 8 μg DNA, from two human kidney paraffin-embedded block section cuts (1 – 1.8 cm2 in surface area and 10 μm in thickness).25 Using this method, we screened non-tumor adjacent FFPE rodent and human tissues for DNA adducts of various carcinogens, including the renal carcinogen aristolochic acid-I (AA-I), the bladder carcinogen 4-aminobiphenyl (4-ABP), the proposed human prostate carcinogen 2-amino-1-methylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), and other adducts formed with carcinogens present in tobacco smoke and grilled meats.25,26,30,34 These DNA adducts were detected as the modified 2′-deoxynucleosides following nuclease digestion by ion trap or Orbitrap MS. Based on these findings, we anticipate that approximately five section cuts of human liver FFPE tissue would provide sufficient DNA for measuring AFB1-FapyGua adducts. However, for AFB1 DNA adduct measurements, we employ acid hydrolysis instead of nuclease digestion. This is because the ring-opened AFB1-Fapy-dG obtained through nuclease digestion undergoes spontaneous equilibration of the α- and β-anomers and the furanose and pyranose forms of the deoxyribose ring, resulting in a complex mixture of Fapy species unsuitable for LC-MS analysis.9 The data reported in our current study demonstrate that our DNA retrieval technology from FFPE newborn mouse liver effectively recovers the ring-opened diastereomeric AFB1-Fapy-dG adducts in high yield, which can be successfully screened as the modified AFB1-FapyGua nucleobase following acid hydrolysis of DNA.

The screening of AFB1-N7-Gua adducts in urine samples is a well-established and widely used method for measuring current exposure to AFB1, while also serving as a valuable biomarker to assess chemoprotective efficacy.1 However, the availability of fresh frozen biopsy tissue for human biomonitoring studies is often limited, impeding the advancement of DNA adduct biomarker research on cancer-causing agents. Employing archived liver tissues from biobanks enables retrospective studies, offering an opportunity to explore potential associations between AFB1-FapyGua adduct levels with phase I and II enzymes involved in AFB1 bioactivation and detoxification, as well as DNA repair enzymes. The use of FFPE specimens can significantly advance our understanding of genetic polymorphisms associated with the risk of AFB1-related cancers.1,11,39 Importantly, this approach is not feasible with urinary DNA adducts.

Conclusions

We successfully developed a robust method to recover ring-opened AFB1-FapyGua DNA adducts from the FFPE blocks of newborn mouse liver tissue. The DNA adduct levels were comparable to those found in matching fresh-frozen tissue samples. The current quantification limit of the Orbitrap LC/MS2 is 4 AFB1-FapyGua adducts per 108 bases with 0.8 μg DNA assayed. However, opportunities for improvement exist. Refinements in the SPE method, aimed at removing ion suppressive components, or the exploration of alternative approaches such as chemical derivatization of the AFB1-FapyGua adducts with quaternary ammonium cationic functional groups, have the potential to enhance the adduct response during electrospray ionization, resulting in lowering the limit of assay quantification.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table

Funding and Acknowledgements

The National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences funded this work through Grant P01 CA160032 (M.P.S, C.J.R. R.S.L, and R.J.T), R01 ES029357 (M.P.S., and R.S.L.), R01 ES019564 and U2 ES02653 (R.J.T), R01 ES031086 (R.S.L.), and P30 CA068485 (Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center); the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences at Oregon Health & Science University supported this work via funds from the Division of Consumer and Business Services of the State of Oregon (ORS 656.630).

The Turesky laboratory gratefully acknowledges the support of the Masonic Chair in Cancer Causation, University of Minnesota. We thank Dr. Miral Dizdaroglu, Biomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for kindly providing the 15N5-deoxyguanosine phosphoramidite used for synthesizing the 11-mer AFB1-[15N5]-FapyGua adducts.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/ …………

Supplementary figures: UV spectra and HPLC analysis of FFPE mouse liver DNA digest; calibration curves for aS-AFB1-FapyGua and aR-AFB1-FapyGua spiked in CT DNA; and proposed CID fragmentation schemes of AFB1-FapyGua at the MS2 and MS3 scan stages.

References

  • (1).Kensler TW, Roebuck BD, Wogan GN, and Groopman JD Aflatoxin: a 50-year odyssey of mechanistic and translational toxicology. Toxicol. Sci 2011, 120 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1), S28–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Some Naturally Occurring Substances: Food Items and Constituents, Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines and Mycotoxins, In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans., 1993, Vol 56, IARC, Lyon, France. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, and Bray F Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136 (5), E359–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Kamdem LK, Meineke I, Godtel-Armbrust U, Brockmoller J, and Wojnowski L Dominant contribution of P450 3A4 to the hepatic carcinogenic activation of aflatoxin B1. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2006, 19 (4), 577–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Essigmann JM, Croy RG, Nadzan AM, Busby WF Jr., Reinhold VN, Buchi G, and Wogan GN Structural identification of the major DNA adduct formed by aflatoxin B1 in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1977, 74 (5), 1870–1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Croy RG, Essigmann JM, Reinhold VN, and Wogan GN Identification of the principal aflatoxin B1-DNA adduct formed in vivo in rat liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1978, 75 (4), 1745–1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Johnson WW, and Guengerich FP Reaction of aflatoxin B1 exo-8,9-epoxide with DNA: kinetic analysis of covalent binding and DNA-induced hydrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1997, 94 (12), 6121–6125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Groopman JD, Croy RG, and Wogan GN In vitro reactions of aflatoxin B1-adducted DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1981, 78 (9), 5445–5449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Brown KL, Deng JZ, Iyer RS, Iyer LG, Voehler MW, Stone MP, Harris CM, and Harris TM Unraveling the aflatoxin-FAPY conundrum: structural basis for differential replicative processing of isomeric forms of the formamidopyrimidine-type DNA adduct of aflatoxin B1. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128 (47), 15188–15199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Croy RG, and Wogan GN Temporal patterns of covalent DNA adducts in rat liver after single and multiple doses of aflatoxin B1. Cancer Res. 1981, 41 (1), 197–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Vartanian V, Minko IG, Chawanthayatham S, Egner PA, Lin YC, Earley LF, Makar R, Eng JR, Camp MT, Li L, Stone MP, Lasarev MR, Groopman JD, Croy RG, Essigmann JM, McCullough AK, and Lloyd RS NEIL1 protects against aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2017, 114 (16), 4207–4212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Smela ME, Hamm ML, Henderson PT, Harris CM, Harris TM, and Essigmann JM The aflatoxin B1 formamidopyrimidine adduct plays a major role in causing the types of mutations observed in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2002, 99 (10), 6655–6660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Fedeles BI, and Essigmann JM Impact of DNA lesion repair, replication and formation on the mutational spectra of environmental carcinogens: Aflatoxin B1 as a case study. DNA Repair (Amst) 2018, 71 12–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Chawanthayatham S, Valentine CC 3rd, Fedeles BI, Fox EJ, Loeb LA, Levine SS, Slocum SL, Wogan GN, Croy RG, and Essigmann JM Mutational spectra of aflatoxin B1 in vivo establish biomarkers of exposure for human hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2017, 114 (15), E3101–E3109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Hwa Yun B, Guo J, Bellamri M, and Turesky RJ DNA adducts: Formation, biological effects, and new biospecimens for mass spectrometric measurements in humans. Mass Spectrom. Rev 2020, 39 (1-2), 55–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Jarabek AM, Pottenger LH, Andrews LS, Casciano D, Embry MR, Kim JH, Preston RJ, Reddy MV, Schoeny R, Shuker D, Skare J, Swenberg J, Williams GM, and Zeiger E Creating context for the use of DNA adduct data in cancer risk assessment: I. Data organization. Crit, Rev, Toxicol. 2009, 39 (8), 659–678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Himmelstein MW, Boogaard PJ, Cadet J, Farmer PB, Kim JH, Martin EA, Persaud R, and Shuker DE Creating context for the use of DNA adduct data in cancer risk assessment: II. Overview of methods of identification and quantitation of DNA damage. Crit, Rev, Toxicol, 2009, 39 (8), 679–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Groopman JD, Donahue PR, Zhu JQ, Chen JS, and Wogan GN Aflatoxin metabolism in humans:detection of metabolites and nucleic acid adducts in urine by affinity chromatography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1985, 82 (19), 6492–6496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Groopman JD, Wild CP, Hasler J, Junshi C, Wogan GN, and Kensler TW Molecular epidemiology of aflatoxin exposures: validation of aflatoxin-N7-guanine levels in urine as a biomarker in experimental rat models and humans. Environmental health perspectives 1993, 99 107–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Egner PA, Groopman JD, Wang JS, Kensler TW, and Friesen MD Quantification of aflatoxin-B1-N7-Guanine in human urine by high-performance liquid chromatography and isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2006, 19 (9), 1191–1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Walton M, Egner P, Scholl PF, Walker J, Kensler TW, and Groopman JD Liquid chromatography electrospray-mass spectrometry of urinary aflatoxin biomarkers: characterization and application to dosimetry and chemoprevention in rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2001, 14 (7), 919–926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Woo LL, Egner PA, Belanger CL, Wattanawaraporn R, Trudel LJ, Croy RG, Groopman JD, Essigmann JM, Wogan GN, and Bouhenguel JT Aflatoxin B1-DNA adduct formation and mutagenicity in livers of neonatal male and female B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol. Sci 2011, 122 (1), 38–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Coskun E, Jaruga P, Vartanian V, Erdem O, Egner PA, Groopman JD, Lloyd RS, and Dizdaroglu M Aflatoxin-Guanine DNA Adducts and Oxidatively Induced DNA Damage in Aflatoxin-Treated Mice in Vivo as Measured by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Isotope Dilution. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2019, 32 (1), 80–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Jaruga P, Tomar R, Kant M, Vartanian V, Sexton B, Rizzo CJ, Turesky RJ, Stone MP, Lloyd RS, and Dizdaroglu M Synthesis and Characterization of 15N5-Labeled Aflatoxin B1-Formamidopyrimidines and Aflatoxin B1-N7-Guanine from a Partial Double-Stranded Oligodeoxynucleotide as Internal Standards for Mass Spectrometric Measurements. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (16), 14841–14854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Yun BH, Rosenquist TA, Nikolic J, Dragicevic D, Tomic K, Jelakovic B, Dickman KG, Grollman AP, and Turesky RJ Human formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues: an untapped specimen for biomonitoring of carcinogen DNA adducts by mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem 2013, 85 (9), 4251–4258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Guo J, Yun BH, Upadhyaya P, Yao L, Krishnamachari S, Rosenquist TA, Grollman AP, and Turesky RJ Multiclass Carcinogenic DNA Adduct Quantification in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem 2016, 88 (9), 4780–4787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Guengerich FP, Johnson WW, Shimada T, Ueng YF, Yamazaki H, and Langouet S Activation and detoxication of aflatoxin B1. Mutat. Res 1998, 402 (1-2), 121–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Lin JK, Miller JA, and Miller EC 2,3-Dihydro-2-(guan-7-yl)-3-hydroxy-aflatoxin B1, a major acid hydrolysis product of aflatoxin B1-DNA or -ribosomal RNA adducts formed in hepatic microsome-mediated reactions and in rat liver in vivo. Cancer Res. 1977, 37 (12), 4430–4438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Yun BH, Yao L, Jelakovic B, Nikolic J, Dickman KG, Grollman AP, Rosenquist TA, and Turesky RJ Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue as a source for quantitation of carcinogen DNA adducts: aristolochic acid as a prototype carcinogen. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35 (9), 2055–2061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Yun BH, Xiao S, Yao L, Krishnamachari S, Rosenquist TA, Dickman KG, Grollman AP, Murugan P, Weight CJ, and Turesky RJ A Rapid Throughput Method To Extract DNA from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues for Biomonitoring Carcinogenic DNA Adducts. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2017, 30 (12), 2130–2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Wilfinger WW, Mackey K, and Chomczynski P Effect of pH and ionic strength on the spectrophotometric assessment of nucleic acid purity. BioTechniques 1997, 22 (3), 474–476, 478-481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).MacDougall D, Amore FJ, Cox GV, Crosby DG, Estes FL, Freeman DH, Gibbs WE, Gordon GE, Keith LH, Lal J, Langner RR, McClelland NI, Phillips WF, Pojasek RB, and Sievers RE Guidelines for data acquistion and data quality evaluation in environmental chemistry. Anal. Chem 1980, 52 2242–2249. [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Wang P, Zhang Q, Yao Y, and Giese RW Cationic Xylene Tag for Increasing Sensitivity in Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2015, 26 (10), 1713–1721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Konorev D, Yao L, and Turesky RJ Multi-DNA Adduct and Abasic Site Quantitation In Vivo by Nano-Liquid Chromatography/High-Resolution Orbitrap Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Methodology for Biomonitoring Colorectal DNA Damage. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2022, 35 (9), 1519–1532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Zhang YJ, Chen CJ, Lee CS, Haghighi B, Yang GY, Wang LW, Feitelson M, and Santella R Aflatoxin B1-DNA adducts and hepatitis B virus antigens in hepatocellular carcinoma and non-tumorous liver tissue. Carcinogenesis 1991, 12 (12), 2247–2252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Hsieh LL, Hsu SW, Chen DS, and Santella RM Immunological detection of aflatoxin B1-DNA adducts formed in vivo. Cancer Res.. 1988, 48 (22), 6328–6331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Lunn RM, Zhang YJ, Wang LY, Chen CJ, Lee PH, Lee CS, Tsai WY, and Santella RM p53 mutations, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, and aflatoxin exposure in hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. Cancer Res.. 1997, 57 (16), 3471–3477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Gramantieri L, Gnudi F, Vasuri F, Mandrioli D, Fornari F, Tovoli F, Suzzi F, Vornoli A, D’Errico A, Piscaglia F, and Giovannini C Aflatoxin B1 DNA-Adducts in Hepatocellular Carcinoma from a Low Exposure Area. Nutrients 2022, 14 (8), 1652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Guengerich FP, Johnson WW, Ueng YF, Yamazaki H, and Shimada T Involvement of cytochrome P450, glutathione S-transferase, and epoxide hydrolase in the metabolism of aflatoxin B1 and relevance to risk of human liver cancer. Environmental health perspectives 1996, 104 Suppl 3 (Suppl 3), 557–562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table

RESOURCES