Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):e249–e250. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004168

The authors reply:

Anica C Law 1, Jennifer P Stevens 2, Allan J Walkey 3
PMCID: PMC11279912  NIHMSID: NIHMS1984719  PMID: 32058389

We thank Dr. Oud (1) for his thoughtful and important points about our recently published study (2) in Critical Care Medicine. Oud (1) is correct that using the National Inpatient Sample precludes linkage of inpatient data to other post-hospital data sources, and that, as noted in our Discussion, “earlier hospital transfer to long-term acute care hospitals and/or increased discharge to hospice over time (3, 4) may shift deaths out of hospital without meaningfully changing overall mortality.”

However, the premise of performing stratified analysis with 48-hour mortality, 3–14-day mortality, and greater than 14-day mortality subgroups was recent evidence suggesting that “early” deaths are more directly attributable to sepsis itself (and thereby, modifiable by sepsis-specific initiatives), while late deaths are associated with pre-ICU comorbidities. Therefore, in contrast to prior studies investigating unstratified (e.g., 30-d or in-hospital) mortality, we expected that “early” (i.e., 48-hr) mortality would be a more specific way to capture the effect of sepsis initiatives in the past 20 years. Our finding that septic shock 48-hour mortality declined markedly over 2 decades is unlikely to be explained by discharge to hospice or long-term acute care hospitals, which generally occur later in a patient’s course. Furthermore, the opposite direction of 48-hour mortality trends between mechanically ventilated patients with and without septic shock is also unlikely to be explained by increased discharge to long-term acute care hospitals or hospice.

We agree that evaluation of trends in 3–14-day mortality and greater than 14-day mortality, like prior studies of 30-day or in-hospital mortality, remains vulnerable to changing trends in patient disposition. We view our findings as hypothesis-generating, and further studies linking post-hospital data (including date of death) may help explain whether our observed decreases in 3–14-day in-hospital mortality or greater than 14-day in-hospital mortality are meaningful decreases in mortality (perhaps due general ICU quality improvements, rather than sepsis-specific initiatives) or artifacts of changing trends in disposition. In the meantime, our finding of decreased early, 48-hour septic shock mortality (contrasted with increasing early mortality in mechanical ventilation) may provide context to understanding the impact of sepsis management strategies over time.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Law’s institution received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute on Aging 1F32AG058352. Dr. Stevens received support from 5K08HS024288 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and she receives royalties from UpToDate (chapter on rapid response teams) and from McGraw-Hill (textbook on healthcare delivery science). Dr. Walkey received support from 1R01HL136660 (NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NHLBI]), 1R01HL139751 (NIH/NHLBI), Boston University School of Medicine Department of Medicine Career Investment Award, and he receives royalties from UpToDate.

Contributor Information

Anica C. Law, Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Jennifer P. Stevens, Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Allan J. Walkey, Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences and The Pulmonary Center, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Oud L: Trends of Time to Hospital Mortality Versus Timing of Death Among Patients With Septic Shock in Administrative Data. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:e249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Law AC, Stevens JP, Walkey AJ: National trends in timing of death among patients with septic shock, 1994–2014. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:1493–1496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, et al. ; CDC Prevention Epicenter Program: Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009–2014. JAMA 2017; 318:1241–1249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mehta AB, Syeda SN, Bajpayee L, et al. : Trends in tracheostomy for mechanically ventilated patients in the United States, 1993–2012. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192:446–454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES