Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1994 Oct;51(10):689–692. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.10.689

Occupational hand dermatoses of hairdressers in Tainan City.

Y L Guo 1, B J Wang 1, J Y Lee 1, S Y Chou 1
PMCID: PMC1128078  PMID: 8000494

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To determine the prevalence, clinical features, and patterns of hand dermatosis in hairdressers in Tainan, Taiwan, and to examine the associations between patterns of dermatosis and risk factors such as job description, work exposure, and sensitisation to common allergens. METHODS--Interviews, examinations, and patch tests of the hairdressers from nine hairdressing stores randomly selected from Tainan City. Patch test agents included 41 substances with common allergens, shampoo preservatives, hair dyes, permanent waving and bleaching agents. RESULTS--98 hairdressers finished the examination, 83% of them had occupational dermatosis and 32% had scissor induced scars or wounds. Most of the dermatoses belonged to either dry metacarpophalangeal dermatitis or eczema of the fingers. 44% of the hairdressers showed positive skin reaction to one or more patch test agents. The patch test results were different from previous reports in that the most common allergens were nickel, thimerosal, Captan, Kathon CG, and fragrance mix, and that the sensitivity to hair dye and permanent wave ingredients were low. The dry metacarpophalangeal dermatitis was associated with exposure to shampoo, and the eczema of the fingers with skin sensitivity to patch test agents. CONCLUSION--Hairdressers in Tainan City had a high prevalence of dermatoses including traumatic wounds, and allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. The rates of sensitivity to some of the common sensitising agents were different from previous reports.

Full text

PDF
689

Images in this article

690Figure 1
on p.690
691Figure 2
on p.691

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cronin E., Kullavanijaya P. Hand dermatitis in haridressers. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1979;59(85):47–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Frosch P. J., Burrows D., Camarasa J. G., Dooms-Goossens A., Ducombs G., Lahti A., Menné T., Rycroft R. J., Shaw S., White I. R. Allergic reactions to a hairdressers' series: results from 9 European centres. The European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG). Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Mar;28(3):180–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb03383.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guerra L., Tosti A., Bardazzi F., Pigatto P., Lisi P., Santucci B., Valsecchi R., Schena D., Angelini G., Sertoli A. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: the Italian experience. Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali. Contact Dermatitis. 1992 Feb;26(2):101–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00892.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hannuksela M. Epicutaneous testing. Allergy. 1979 Feb;34(1):5–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1979.tb01994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holness D. L., Nethercott J. R. Dermatitis in hairdressers. Dermatol Clin. 1990 Jan;8(1):119–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Larsson-Stymne B., Widström L. Ear piercing--a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls? Contact Dermatitis. 1985 Nov;13(5):289–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02580.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lynde C. W., Mitchell J. C. Patch test results in 66 hairdressers 1973--81. Contact Dermatitis. 1982 Sep;8(5):302–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1982.tb04235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Matsunaga K., Hosokawa K., Suzuki M., Arima Y., Hayakawa R. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in beauticians. Contact Dermatitis. 1988 Feb;18(2):94–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nethercott J. R., MacPherson M., Choi B. C., Nixon P. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis. 1986 Feb;14(2):73–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rystedt I. Work-related hand eczema in atopics. Contact Dermatitis. 1985 Mar;12(3):164–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb01087.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shuster S., Spiro J. Measurement of risk of sensitisation and its application to Kathon. Contact Dermatitis. 1987 Nov;17(5):299–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb01481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Storrs F. J. Permanent wave contact dermatitis: contact allergy to glyceryl monothioglycolate. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984 Jul;11(1):74–85. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(84)70138-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tosti A., Manuzzi P., de Padova M. P. Contact dermatitis to Kathon CG. Contact Dermatitis. 1986 May;14(5):326–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb05298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wahlberg J. E. Nickel allergy and atopy in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis. 1975 Jun;1(3):161–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. de Groot A. C., Weyland J. W. Kathon CG: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988 Feb;18(2 Pt 1):350–358. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(88)70051-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES