Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1994 Nov;51(11):744–748. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.11.744

Ocular and nasal irritation in operatives in Lancashire cotton and synthetic fibre mills.

D Fishwick 1, A M Fletcher 1, C A Pickering 1, R M Niven 1, E B Faragher 1
PMCID: PMC1128098  PMID: 7849851

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To document the prevalence of work related ocular (eyeWRI) and nasal (noseWRI) irritation in workers in spinning mills of cotton and synthetic textile fibres and to relate the prevalence of symptoms to atopy, byssinotic symptoms, work history, and measured dust concentrations in the personal breathing zone and work area. METHODS--A cross sectional study of 1048 cotton workers and 404 synthetic fibre workers was performed. A respiratory questionnaire was given to 1452 workers (95% of the total available population). Atopy was judged by skin prick tests to three common allergens. Work area cotton dust sampling (WAdust) was carried out according to EH25 guidelines in nine of the 11 spinning mills included in the study. Personal breathing zone dust concentrations were assessed with the IOM sampler to derive total dust exposure (PTdust) and a concentration calculated after the removal of fly (Pless). RESULTS--3.7% of all operatives complained of symptoms of byssinosis, 253 (17.5%) complained of eyeWRI and 165 (11%) of noseWRI. These symptoms did not relate to atopy or byssinosis, or correlate univariately with any measure of cotton dust exposure (noseWRI v WAdust r = 0.153, PTdust r = 0.118, eyeWRI v WAdust r = 0.029, PTdust r = 0.052). Both of these symptoms on logistic regression analysis were related to being of white origin (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001), and younger age (P < 0.001). With regression analysis, there was a negative relation between dust concentration and prevalence of symptoms. CONCLUSION--Work related ocular and nasal irritation are the most common symptoms complained of by cotton textile workers. There was no relation between these symptoms and atopy, byssinosis, or dust concentration. It is likely that they relate to as yet unidentified agents unrelated to concentration of cotton dust.

Full text

PDF
744

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aoyama K., Ueda A., Manda F., Matsushita T., Ueda T., Yamauchi C. Allergy to laboratory animals: an epidemiological study. Br J Ind Med. 1992 Jan;49(1):41–47. doi: 10.1136/oem.49.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cinkotai F. F., Rigby A., Pickering C. A., Seaborn D., Faragher E. Recent trends in the prevalence of byssinotic symptoms in the Lancashire textile industry. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Nov;45(11):782–789. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.11.782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cockcroft A., Edwards J., McCarthy P., Andersson N. Allergy in laboratory animal workers. Lancet. 1981 Apr 11;1(8224):827–830. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92693-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fishwick D., Fletcher A. M., Pickering C. A., Niven R. M., Faragher E. B. Lung function, bronchial reactivity, atopic status, and dust exposure in Lancashire cotton mill operatives. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 May;145(5):1103–1108. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jachuck S. J., Bound C. L., Steel J., Blain P. G. Occupational hazard in hospital staff exposed to 2 per cent glutaraldehyde in an endoscopy unit. J Soc Occup Med. 1989 Summer;39(2):69–71. doi: 10.1093/occmed/39.2.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jaeger D., Kleinhans D., Czuppon A. B., Baur X. Latex-specific proteins causing immediate-type cutaneous, nasal, bronchial, and systemic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992 Mar;89(3):759–768. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(92)90385-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Love R. G., Smith T. A., Gurr D., Soutar C. A., Scarisbrick D. A., Seaton A. Respiratory and allergic symptoms in wool textile workers. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Nov;45(11):727–741. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.11.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Molyneux M. K., Tombleson J. B. An epidemiological study of respiratory symptoms in Lancashire mills, 1963-66. Br J Ind Med. 1970 Jul;27(3):225–234. doi: 10.1136/oem.27.3.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Musk A. W., Venables K. M., Crook B., Nunn A. J., Hawkins R., Crook G. D., Graneek B. J., Tee R. D., Farrer N., Johnson D. A. Respiratory symptoms, lung function, and sensitisation to flour in a British bakery. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Sep;46(9):636–642. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.9.636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwartz H. J., Arnold J. L., Strohl K. P. Occupational allergic rhinitis in the hair care industry: reactions to permanent wave solutions. J Occup Med. 1990 May;32(5):473–475. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199005000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zuskin E., Kanceljak B., Pokrajac D., Schachter E. N., Witek T. J., Jr Respiratory symptoms and lung function in hemp workers. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Sep;47(9):627–632. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.9.627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES