Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1994 Dec;51(12):833–838. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.12.833

Controlled two year follow up of rehabilitation for disorders in the neck and shoulders.

K Ekberg 1, B Björkqvist 1, P Malm 1, B Bjerre-Kiely 1, O Axelson 1
PMCID: PMC1128125  PMID: 7849868

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the effects of an early, active, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for neck and shoulder disorders. METHODS--Primary health care and industrial health care of a nonrandomised, controlled, cohort was followed up over two years in a geographically defined area. The cohort consisted of working people who consulted a physician about disorders of the neck or shoulders from 1 August 1988 to 31 October 1989. Criteria for acceptance; not chronic symptoms, patients had sick leave of no more than four weeks. Disorders were not caused by trauma, infections, malignancy, rheumatic diseases, abuse, or pregnancy. 107 people qualified for the study, 87% were followed up for two years. They were divided into two groups. One group obtained active, multidisciplinary rehabilitation for eight weeks that comprised physical training, information, education, social interaction, and work place visits. Controls were given traditional treatment; physiotherapy, medication, rest, and sick leave. The main outcome measures were: average number of days of sick leave for the two years after rehabilitation, subjective pain on a visual analogue scale, and ratings on seven subscales of the sickness impact profile. RESULTS--At 12 and 24 months of follow up effects of the active rehabilitation programme did not differ from traditional treatment in any of the outcome measures. New work task (P < 0.05) or changed work place (P < 0.001) during the follow up period were associated with decreased sick leave, independent of treatment. CONCLUSIONS--Active, multidisciplinary rehabilitation of neck and shoulder disorders was not more effective than traditional treatment. Changed work conditions were associated with decreased sick leave, independent of type of treatment provided.

Full text

PDF
833

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahlbom A., Axelson O., Støttrup Hansen E. S., Hogstedt C., Jensen U. J., Olsen J. Interpretation of "negative" studies in occupational epidemiology. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990 Jun;16(3):153–157. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-Sira Z. Disability, stress and readjustment: the function of the professional's latent goals and affective behavior in rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(1):43–55. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90323-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Carter W. B., Gilson B. S. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787–805. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonsall J. L., Squier J. E., Baron C. A., Parker G. Effect of physiotherapy on sickness absence in industry: a comparative study. J Soc Occup Med. 1991 Winter;41(4):176–180. doi: 10.1093/occmed/41.4.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deyo R. A., Diehl A. K., Rosenthal M. How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med. 1986 Oct 23;315(17):1064–1070. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198610233151705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deyo R. A., Walsh N. E., Martin D. C., Schoenfeld L. S., Ramamurthy S. A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 7;322(23):1627–1634. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006073222303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ekberg K., Björkqvist B., Malm P., Bjerre-Kiely B., Karlsson M., Axelson O. Case-control study of risk factors for disease in the neck and shoulder area. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Apr;51(4):262–266. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.4.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Follick M. J., Smith T. W., Ahern D. K. The sickness impact profile: a global measure of disability in chronic low back pain. Pain. 1985 Jan;21(1):67–76. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90078-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koes B. W., Assendelft W. J., van der Heijden G. J., Bouter L. M., Knipschild P. G. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: a blinded review. BMJ. 1991 Nov 23;303(6813):1298–1303. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6813.1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koes B. W., Bouter L. M., van Mameren H., Essers A. H., Verstegen G. M., Hofhuizen D. M., Houben J. P., Knipschild P. G. Randomised clinical trial of manipulative therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: results of one year follow up. BMJ. 1992 Mar 7;304(6827):601–605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koes B. W., Bouter L. M., van Mameren H., Essers A. H., Verstegen G. M., Hofhuizen D. M., Houben J. P., Knipschild P. G. The effectiveness of manual therapy, physiotherapy, and treatment by the general practitioner for nonspecific back and neck complaints. A randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992 Jan;17(1):28–35. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199201000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kristensen T. S. Sickness absence and work strain among Danish slaughterhouse workers: an analysis of absence from work regarded as coping behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(1):15–27. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90122-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuorinka I., Jonsson B., Kilbom A., Vinterberg H., Biering-Sørensen F., Andersson G., Jørgensen K. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987 Sep;18(3):233–237. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Linton S. J., Bradley L. A. An 18-month follow-up of a secondary prevention program for back pain: help and hindrance factors related to outcome maintenance. Clin J Pain. 1992 Sep;8(3):227–236. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199209000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Linton S. J., Hellsing A. L., Andersson D. A controlled study of the effects of an early intervention on acute musculoskeletal pain problems. Pain. 1993 Sep;54(3):353–359. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90037-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Melamed S., Luz J., Najenson T., Jucha E., Green M. Ergonomic stress levels, personal characteristics, accident occurrence and sickness absence among factory workers. Ergonomics. 1989 Sep;32(9):1101–1110. doi: 10.1080/00140138908966877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sullivan M., Ahlmén M., Bjelle A. Health status assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Further work on the validity of the sickness impact profile. J Rheumatol. 1990 Apr;17(4):439–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Waris P., Kuorinka I., Kurppa K., Luopajärvi T., Virolainen M., Pesonen K., Nummi J., Kukkonen R. Epidemiologic screening of occupational neck and upper limb disorders. Methods and criteria. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1979;5 Suppl 3:25–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES