Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1996 Jul;53(7):478–483. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.7.478

Neuropsychological verbal tests may lack "hold" properties in occupational studies of neurotoxic effects.

H Michélsen 1, I Lundberg 1
PMCID: PMC1128517  PMID: 8704873

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--In epidemiological studies of neurotoxic effects neuropsychological tests are often applied to assess possible functional changes. In these studies tests presumed to be resistant to neurotoxic effects, "hold tests", are often used to adjust performance in tests presumed to be sensitive to neurotoxic effects, "nonhold tests", in assessment of pre-exposure ability. This conception is based on experience from the examination of patients with organic brain disorders. For this adjustment to be valid hold tests should change comparatively little over time and should not change differently in groups of people with different exposures to neurotoxic agents. METHODS--These assumptions were examined in 71 carpenters and 135 painters divided in three subgroups according to level of cumulative exposure to organic solvents. The results were noted from two verbal tests (test A, which involved following verbal instructions and test C, word comprehension), which were performed at conscription (age 18-20). The tests resemble hold tests used in occupational studies. The same tests were performed again at the age of 45-60 together with a conventional synonym test (SRB 1), often used in occupational studies. RESULTS--In the three tests given at the time of the investigation some differences were found between the carpenters and the subgroups of painters. The painters with low exposure tended to perform better than the carpenters in all three tests and the heavily exposed painters tended to perform less well in the tests. These differences were not present at the age of 18-20. In one of the conscription tests painters with different cumulative exposure to organic solvents developed differently over time. There was little improvement among painters with heavy and intermediate exposure and obvious improvement among painters with low exposure. The results in the other conscription test showed similar tendencies. CONCLUSIONS--The results indicate that the hold tests examined do not meet basic criteria for hold tests used in occupational studies. Thus adjustments for conventional verbal tests seem inappropriate in such studies. It is possible that other presumed hold tests may meet the criteria but our results suggest that such tests also should be evaluated before being used as hold tests in working populations.

Full text

PDF
478

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cherry N., Hutchins H., Pace T., Waldron H. A. Neurobehavioural effects of repeated occupational exposure to toluene and paint solvents. Br J Ind Med. 1985 May;42(5):291–300. doi: 10.1136/oem.42.5.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ekberg K., Hane M. Test battery for investigating functional disorders--the TUFF battery. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984;10 (Suppl 1):14–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Elofsson S. A., Gamberale F., Hindmarsh T., Iregren A., Isaksson A., Johnsson I., Knave B., Lydahl E., Mindus P., Persson H. E. Exposure to organic solvents. A cross-sectional epidemiologic investigation on occupationally exposed care and industrial spray painters with special reference to the nervous system. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1980 Dec;6(4):239–273. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hane M., Axelson O., Blume J., Hogstedt C., Sundell L., Ydreborg B. Psychological function changes among house painters. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1977 Jun;3(2):91–99. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hänninen H., Eskelinen L., Husman K., Nurminen M. Behavioral effects of long-term exposure to a mixture of organic solvents. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1976 Dec;2(4):240–255. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindström K., Wickström G. Psychological function changes among maintenance house painters exposed to low levels of organic solvent mixtures. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1983;303:81–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb00944.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lundberg I., Michélsen H., Nise G., Hogstedt C., Högberg M., Alfredsson L., Almkvist O., Gustavsson A., Hagman M., Herlofson J. Neuropsychiatric function of housepainters with previous long-term heavy exposure to organic solvents. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995;21 (Suppl 1):1–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mikkelsen S., Jørgensen M., Browne E., Gyldensted C. Mixed solvent exposure and organic brain damage. A study of painters. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1988;118:1–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Russell E. W. Three patterns of brain damage of the WAIS. J Clin Psychol. 1979 Jul;35(3):611–620. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197907)35:3<611::aid-jclp2270350325>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Spurgeon A., Gray C. N., Sims J., Calvert I., Levy L. S., Harvey P. G., Harrington J. M. Neurobehavioral effects of long-term occupational exposure to organic solvents: two comparable studies. Am J Ind Med. 1992;22(3):325–335. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700220306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Triebig G., Barocka A., Erbguth F., Höll R., Lang C., Lehrl S., Rechlin T., Weidenhammer W., Weltle D. Neurotoxicity of solvent mixtures in spray painters. II. Neurologic, psychiatric, psychological, and neuroradiologic findings. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1992;64(5):361–372. doi: 10.1007/BF00379547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. YATES A. J. The validity of some psychological tests of brain damage. Psychol Bull. 1954 Jul;51(4):359–379. doi: 10.1037/h0059891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES