Abstract
Background
Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection is a public health concern due to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Data are limited on repeat MG infection and AMR among US Air Force service members with HIV.
Methods
US Air Force service members seeking HIV care were screened for MG infection during the surveillance period (16 May 2016–16 March 2020). Baseline and repeat MG prevalence rates were estimated. An extended Cox proportional hazards regression model evaluated characteristics associated with repeat MG infection. MG-positive rectal samples were tested for macrolide or fluoroquinolone resistance.
Results
Among 299 male patients from a total of 308 patients followed during the surveillance period, baseline prevalence of MG infection was 19.7% (n = 59); among the 101 patients who screened positive for MG at any time during the surveillance period, repeat MG was 35% (n = 36). Characteristics independently associated with increased risk of repeat infection were sexually transmitted infection history vs none (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.33; 95% CI, 1.26–4.31), a sexually transmitted infection coinfection vs no positive test result in the medical records (aHR, 5.13; 95% CI, 2.78–9.49), and a new HIV diagnosis (<1 vs ≥1 year; aHR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.45–3.73). AMR in MG-positive rectal specimens was 88% (43/49) indicating macrolide resistance, 18% (10/56) quinolone resistance, and 18% (10/56) both.
Conclusions
Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance mutations were common. Testing for co-occurring MG infection and AMR mutations may be warranted in guiding treatment for sexually transmitted infections such as chlamydia or gonorrhea detected at HIV diagnosis.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, human immunodeficiency virus, repeat infection, epidemiology, Mycoplasma genitalium
Repeat Mycoplasma genitalium infection and antibiotic resistance were common among airmen with HIV, suggesting a need for improved sexually transmitted infection screening and treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND
Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has been linked to nongonococcal urethritis, cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and preterm birth [1–4]. The prevalence of MG infection varies by country and by the population studied. In the United States and Britain, the prevalence among men and women in the general population has been low, ranging from 1.0% to 1.7%, whereas in less developed countries the summary prevalence was 3.9% [5–8]. In clinic-based studies, the prevalence ranged from 28.7% among men with urethritis in the United States, 20.8% among asymptomatic women with bacterial vaginosis enrolled from 10 US cities, 16.6% among attendees of sexual health clinics in 6 US cities, and 16.7% among users of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in high-income countries [9–12]. HIV infection can increase susceptibility to STIs and potentially complicate treatment due to compromised immune function. As compared with uninfected men, men with HIV bear a reportedly 6-fold higher overall burden of MG, although this association was not observed for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae [13].
The emergence of macrolide- and fluoroquinolone-resistant MG strains in the United States posed a challenge to the established treatment regimen utilizing azithromycin (first line) and moxifloxacin (second line). Consequently, the national treatment guidelines were revised in 2021 [14, 15]. Macrolide resistance leading to treatment failure has been associated with 5 single-nucleotide mutations within the V region of the 23S rRNA gene at positions 2058 and 2059 (Escherichia coli numbering) [16]. Resistance to fluoroquinolones has been linked to amino acid substitutions in the quinolone resistance-determining region of the gyrA and parC genes. A decline in moxifloxacin efficacy from 100% to 89% has been reported due to resistance associated with mutations found in gyrA/B and parC/E genes [17].
Historically, STI has posed a significant infectious disease threat to US military personnel, potentially amplifying the problem of MG infection [18]. While some studies have investigated the prevalence of MG among US military personnel with and without HIV, reports focusing on antimicrobial resistance, repeat infection, and risk factors are absent [19–22]. Treatment failure due to antimicrobial-resistant MG and subsequent reinfection, especially in an immunocompromised population, could present a problem in patient management and disease control that deserves attention. This study sought to describe the prevalence of repeat MG infection among US Air Force service members with HIV, identify associated factors, and evaluate the prevalence of macrolide- and quinolone-associated resistance exhibited by MG isolates from follow-up of those who sought specialty care for HIV while in service.
METHODS
Patient Population
This study analyzed prospectively collected data from biannual/annual mandatory medical assessments of US Air Force active duty personnel with HIV who traveled for specialty care at a infectious disease clinic in San Antonio, Texas (May 2016–March 2020). During these evaluations, for patients undergoing routine testing for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae and urinalysis, a nurse practitioner collected a urine specimen aliquot and additional extragenital swabs (pharyngeal and rectal) for MG and Trichomonas vaginalis testing and completed a standardized risk assessment for demographic, STI, and sexual risk history. Collection of specimens and risk information has been previously detailed [21]. The extra pharyngeal and rectal swabs and urine specimen aliquot were placed in transport tubes (Hologic) shipped for nucleic acid amplification testing (Aptima MG analyte-specific reagents [research use only] and Aptima T vaginalis; Hologic) to the HIV Diagnostics and Reference Laboratory (Walter Reed Institute of Research).
Patient Consent Statement
The Division of Human Subject Protection of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and the Public Health Review Board of the Defense Centers of Public Health–Aberdeen (formerly, Army Public Health Center) determined that the project was a public health activity not requiring informed consent.
Antimicrobial Resistance Sequencing
Sample aliquots remaining from urine and extragenital specimens, which were shipped in transport tubes and tested for MG and T vaginalis, were frozen at −80 °C until 10 December 2020, when all available aliquots were transferred to the Viral Sequencing Core laboratory (Walter Reed Institute of Research) for sequencing. The transport tube contained buffer that lysed target cells and released target ribosomal RNA, thus preventing degradation during storage. Due to the higher proportion of positive rectal samples, these were prioritized for sequencing. While methods for urine and pharyngeal samples were established, resource limitations necessitated focusing on rectal samples for this study. Consequently, corresponding methods and results presented here pertain solely to rectal samples.
The main gene targets for macrolide (23S) and fluoroquinolone (parC and gyrA) were selected for investigation, with other targets around the L4 and L22 proteins of the ribosomal complex known to confer macrolide resistance in other Mollucites, such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae [16, 23, 24].
For available volume from all rectal swab samples, DNA isolation was performed with the NucleoSpin DNA Stool Mini Kit for DNA (Macherey-Nagel Inc) with an additional wash with ST4 buffer as recommended by the supplier. Nucleic acids were amplified via a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) strategy with Titanium Taq (Takara Bio USA Inc) for each region. The amplification primers were as shown in Table 1. The primer sequences were obtained from the literature for regions 23S, L4 and L22, parC, and gyr or designed for MG strain 75956 (GenBank: CP145105) as a template for alternative amplification primer sites proximal to target regions [16, 23, 25]. Candidate primers were further subjected to a BLASTn search to maximize specificity to MG by excluding primers that had any similarity to other pathogens or human genes matched in the BLASTn search.
Table 1.
Primers Used for Sequencing of Mycoplasma genitalium in the Study
| Primer | Sequence (5’ → 3') | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| MG 23S-1stF | GAAGGTTAAAGAAGGAGGTTAGCAAT | In house |
| MG 23S-1stR | TATAACGGCTCTTACTTTCCTTTAACAG | In house |
| MG 23S-2682r | CGGTCCTCTCGTACTAGAAGCAAAG | Jensen 2008 [16] |
| MG 23S-1986f | GTGTAACCATCTCTTGACTGTCTCGG | Jensen 2008 [16] |
| MG_L4_1st F | CCCAAAAATTGAAGAAGAGAAAACT | In house |
| MG_L4_1st R | ACCCCATAGATAATTTCAAACGCTAG | In house |
| MG L4-4f | AAGTAATGGCTAAACTTAAAGTAATCC | Jensen 2008 [16] |
| MG L4+1r | TTTAAGAGTATGTTGGTTACATCCATAG | Jensen 2008 [16] |
| MG L22+55f_1st F | CCTTCAGTGTGCATAACGGTA | In house |
| MG L22+55f_1st R | AGGTTACGGATCTTCTCATCTTG | In house |
| MG L22+55f | ATGGTAGGTCATAAGTTGGGTGAGTTT | Jensen 2008 [16] |
| MG L22+55r | AGTTCTTATTAATGCCAAACCTTAAGCC | Jensen 2008 [16] |
| MG-PARC-A_1st | GGCAATTGAAGAAGTCTTTGCAG | In house |
| MG-PARC-B_1st | GCTATCCCACTCGCACCATT | In house |
| MG-PARC-A | TGGGCTTAAAACCCACCACT | Shimada 2010 [23] |
| MG-PARC-B | ATGCGTTACACAGAAACCCG | Shimada 2010 [23] |
| ParC_2nd RD_FWD | GCTTTACCTGATCTAAGAGATGGG | In house |
| ParC_2nd RD_R | CATACAAGCTTAAGCGGGTTTC | In house |
| MG gyrBA_F_1st | GGTTAGAACATTGTTAAAAGTTACTGTTGA | In house |
| MG gyrBA_R_1st | AGCTGCTGGTAGAACAGTTGGTT | In house |
| MG-GYRA-A | CGTCGTGTTCTTTATGGTGC | Shimada 2010 [23] |
| MG-GYRA-B | ATAACGYYGTGCAGCAGGTC | Shimada 2010 [23] |
| gyrktF | GCTCGTGCTTTACCTGATGCTAGA | Tagg 2013 [25] |
| gyrktR | AACGTTGTGCAGCAGGTCT | Tagg 2013 [25] |
PCR cycling conditions for the various amplifications included standard denaturation of 95 °C for 30 seconds and 68 °C for a 2-minute extension for 30 cycles. The annealing conditions varied per each region as follows for 30 seconds: 23S region, 60 °C for first round, 63 °C for second round; parC, 55 °C for first round, 58 °C for second round; L4, 63 °C for first round, 55 °C for second round. Gyrase and L22 annealing conditions were 60 °C for both rounds of PCR. Samples that failed to amplify were then subjected to a postextraction genome amplification with Genomiphi (Cytiva) prior to PCR. PCR cycling conditions for the various amplifications include standard denaturation of 95 °C for 30 seconds and 68 °C for a 2-minute extension for 30 cycles. The annealing conditions varied per each region as follows for 30 seconds: 23S region, 60 °C for first round, 63 °C for second round; parC, 55 °C for first round, 58 °C for second round; L4, 63 °C for first round, 55 °C for second round. Gyrase and L22 annealing conditions were 60 °C for both rounds of PCR.
Sanger sequencing was performed on the amplicon of the targeted regions directly on both strands with Big Dye terminator reaction kits and an ABI_3730xl genetic analyzer (Thermo Fisher). DNA sequences were assembled with Sequencher software version 3.1 (Genecodes Inc). The obtained sequences were aligned to reference sequence for MG strain M2321 (GenBank: CP003770.1).
For macrolide resistance, nucleic acid changes were evaluated at position 2058 or 2059 for the 23S gene [16]. For fluoroquinolone resistance, mutations at amino acid positions AA 84, 87, or 97 Y of the parC gene (topoisomerase) were examined [23].
Statistical Analysis
The proportion of patients with baseline prevalence, incident, repeat, and macrolide/fluoroquinolone-resistant MG was described during follow-up in the surveillance period. Baseline prevalence was assessed at the first visit in the surveillance period. Patients who initially tested negative (baseline) or during follow-up visits but subsequently tested positive were considered to have acquired an incident infection. Repeat infection was classified as a positive test result followed by another positive test result for the same patient at 1 or more subsequent visits within the surveillance period. To be considered a repeat infection, the positive test result had to occur >30 days after treatment for the previous infection. Only 1 positive test result per patient per visit was counted as an infection, irrespective of the collection site. During the surveillance period, patients were evaluated for MG at every biannual/annual visit and, if diagnosed, received appropriate treatment.
Descriptive statistical analyses were used to explore differences in demographic, behavioral, and laboratory characteristics at entry for patients with single vs repeat infection via the chi-square, Fisher exact, or Kruskal-Wallis test. All 95% CIs were 2-tailed, and statistical significance was assessed at a P < .05. The Andersen-Gill extension of the Cox proportional hazards regression model was fit to the data to evaluate baseline and time-varying patient characteristics associated with repeat MG. While the Cox model analyzes the hazard of an event occurring, the counting process approach introduced by Andersen and Gill can handle recurrent or multiple events within a subject. This allows for the inclusion of those who experience multiple or repeated events over time (eg, multiple MG infections in the same patient) [26]. We investigated the relationship between individual characteristics and repeat infection via univariate Andersen and Gill models and estimated unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs). Characteristics significantly associated with repeat infection (P < .05) were then incorporated into a multivariate model to account for the potential confounding effects of other factors and to estimate adjusted HRs. All patient characteristics were self-reported except for STI coinfection status, which was extracted from electronic medical records. All data management and analyses were performed with SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute).
RESULTS
Over a nearly 4-year period (16 May 2016–16 March 2020), 2417 specimens were collected and tested from 308 patients with HIV who were receiving infectious disease specialty care. Analysis in this report was restricted to male patients (n = 299, 97%), since only 9 patients were female. Among females who were excluded, 1 patient's rectal MG specimen was identified with macrolide resistance (23S A2059G, L22 bp81G>R). T vaginalis infections were excluded from analysis since only 8 infections were identified among men in the surveillance period.
Male patients were followed a median 1.8 years (IQR, 0.5–2.8) and tested a median 9 times (IQR, 6–12), accounting for each specimen type. Most patients (n = 198, 66%) had no diagnosis of MG infection in the surveillance period, whereas almost a quarter (n = 65, 22%) were diagnosed with infection only once (Figure 1). The follow-up time for patients with 1 infection (median, 2.0 years; IQR, 0.6–2.7) was similar to that of patients with multiple infections (median, 2.1 years; IQR, 1.1–3.0). The difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). Baseline prevalence of MG was 19.7% (59/299; 95% CI, 15.5%–24.5%) and was highest for rectal specimens (13.9%, 41/294), followed by urine (6.7%, 18/268) and pharyngeal (1.7%, 5/296) specimens. Out of 240 patients initially testing negative for MG, 193 had a follow-up visit, during which 42 were diagnosed with MG infection, resulting in an incidence rate of 10.8 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 7.8–14.7). Among an overall 101 (33.8%) patients diagnosed with MG infection at any time during the surveillance period, 36 (35%) were detected with MG repeatedly up to 5 times, for a repeat diagnosis rate of 47 events per 100 person-years (95% CI, 33.7–64.8). Repeat infections were identified a median 11.9 months apart (IQR, 6.9–12.6). Figure 2 depicts the pattern of repeat infection observed during the 46-month surveillance time frame.
Figure 1.
Distribution of Mycoplasma genitalium infections, overall and by specimen source, among airmen with HIV, 16 May 2016 through 16 March 2020.
Figure 2.
Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infections among airmen with HIV, 16 May 2016 through 16 March 2020. This chart visualizes the progression of MG test results over time for each patient who tested positive during the study period.
Most male patients were 19 to 39 years of age (90%), enlisted (84%), and single (57%; Table 2). A higher proportion (25%) of patients with repeat infections reported prior STI symptoms at entry as compared with those with a single infection (12%; Table 2). In univariate analysis, 3 characteristics were significantly associated (P < .05) with an increased risk of repeat infection (Table 3): self-report of prior STI (vs none; HR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.87–8.56), having an STI coinfection (vs no documented positive test result; HR, 5.58; 95% CI, 2.41–12.9), and a recent diagnosis of HIV (<1 vs ≥1 year; HR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.72–7.37). Although the risk decreased after adjustment in multivariate analysis, the 3 characteristics remained independently associated with an increased risk of repeat infection: STI history vs none (adjusted HR [aHR], 2.33; 95% CI 1.45–3.73), presence of STI coinfection vs no documented positive test result (aHR, 5.13; 95% CI, 2.78–9.49), and <1 year since HIV diagnosis vs ≥1 year (aHR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.45–3.73).
Table 2.
Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Sexual Behavior Characteristics of 299 Male Air Force Service Members With HIV, Overall and by Mycoplasma genitalium Positivity, 2016–2020
| Overall (n = 299) | Single Infection (n = 65) | Repeat Infection (n = 36) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic at Entry | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | P Value |
| Age | |||||||
| Median, IQR | 30 | 25–35 | 29 | 26–35 | 27 | 24–33 | |
| 19–29 | 144 | 48 | 33 | 51 | 20 | 56 | .5196 |
| 30–39 | 126 | 42 | 29 | 45 | 13 | 36 | |
| 40–49 | 25 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6 | |
| 50–59 | 3 | 1 | … | … | 1 | 3 | |
| ≥60 | 1 | 0 | … | … | … | … | |
| Grade | .4791 | ||||||
| E1–E4 | 93 | 31 | 19 | 29 | 14 | 39 | |
| E5–E9 | 157 | 53 | 36 | 55 | 13 | 36 | |
| Officer | 26 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 19 | |
| Not indicated | 23 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 6 | |
| Education level attained | .4099 | ||||||
| Some high school/high school | 35 | 12 | 9 | 14 | 5 | 14 | |
| Some college/technical school | 108 | 36 | 21 | 32 | 11 | 31 | |
| College degree | 58 | 19 | 13 | 20 | 10 | 28 | |
| Undergraduate degree | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 4 | 11 | |
| Graduate degree | 31 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 14 | |
| Not indicated | 29 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 3 | |
| Marital status | .0354 | ||||||
| Single | 169 | 57 | 46 | 71 | 23 | 64 | |
| Live-in partner | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Married | 60 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 5 | 14 | |
| Separated | 13 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Divorced | 20 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 8 | |
| Not indicated | 31 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 3 | |
| Race | .4792 | ||||||
| Black | 136 | 46 | 30 | 46 | 17 | 47 | |
| White | 95 | 32 | 21 | 32 | 14 | 39 | |
| Other | 68 | 22 | 14 | 22 | 5 | 14 | |
| Prior symptoms | .0103 | ||||||
| Yes | 46 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 9 | 25 | |
| No | 173 | 58 | 28 | 43 | 19 | 53 | |
| Not indicated | 80 | 27 | 29 | 45 | 8 | 22 | |
| Symptoms at visit | .0002 | ||||||
| Yes | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | … | … | |
| No | 58 | 19 | 25 | 38 | 7 | 19 | |
| Not indicated | 236 | 79 | 37 | 57 | 29 | 81 | |
| Prior STI | .507 | ||||||
| Yes | 39 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 17 | |
| No | 231 | 78 | 51 | 78 | 29 | 81 | |
| Not indicated/not applicable | 29 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 3 | |
| STI coinfection | <.0001 | ||||||
| No positive result in medical records | 280 | 94 | 52 | 80 | 30 | 83 | |
| Yes | 19 | 6 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 17 | |
| Chlamydia trachomatis | 9 | 47 | 7 | 54 | 2 | 33 | |
| Neisseria gonorrhoea | 6 | 32 | 3 | 23 | 3 | 50 | |
| Syphilis | 3 | 16 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 17 | |
| Chlamydia trachomatis/syphilis | 1 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Type of sexual contact, last visit | .4589 | ||||||
| Men only | 153 | 51 | 36 | 55 | 23 | 64 | |
| Women only | 37 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 3 | |
| Both men and women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | … | … | |
| No sexual contact | 34 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 3 | |
| Not indicated | 71 | 23 | 12 | 18 | 11 | 31 | |
| Sexual contact, past year | .0207 | ||||||
| Men only | 184 | 62 | 45 | 69 | 30 | 83 | |
| Women only | 50 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 3 | 8 | |
| Both men and women | 14 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| No sexual contact | 22 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| Not indicated | 29 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 3 | |
| Positive MG result at entry | <.0001 | ||||||
| Yes | 100 | 34 | 64 | 98 | 36 | 100 | |
| No/not applicable | 199 | 67 | 1 | 2 | … | … | |
| Years from HIV diagnosis | .0182 | ||||||
| Median, IQR | 1.8 | 0.13–5.57 | 1.11 | 0.11–5.49 | 0.4 | 0.09–2.65 | |
| <1 | 129 | 43 | 32 | 49 | 21 | 58 | |
| ≥1 | 163 | 55 | 33 | 51 | 15 | 42 | |
| Missing | 7 | 2 | … | … | … | … | |
| Years in service | .0593 | ||||||
| Median, IQR | 8 | 5–14 | 9 | 5–14 | 5.5 | 3–11.5 | |
| <9 | 144 | 48 | 31 | 48 | 22 | 61 | |
| ≥9 | 135 | 45 | 32 | 49 | 14 | 39 | |
| Missing | 20 | 7 | 2 | 3 | … | … | |
Abbreviations: MG, Mycoplasma genitalium; STI, sexually transmitted infection.
Table 3.
Unadjusted and Adjusted Hazard Ratios for Male Air Force Service Members With HIV With Specimens Repeatedly Positive for Mycoplasma genitalium, 2016–2020
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic: Comparison | HR | 95% CI | P Value | HR | 95% CI | P Value |
| Age: 19–29 vs ≥30 y | ||||||
| At entry | 1.36 | .65–2.86 | .41 | |||
| At sample collection | 1.24 | .60–2.57 | .56 | |||
| Race: White vs Black/other | 1.98 | 1.00–3.91 | .05 | |||
| Pay grade vs E1–E4 | ||||||
| E5–E9 | 0.52 | .23–1.17 | .11 | |||
| Officer | 1.23 | .36–4.19 | .75 | |||
| Highest education attained vs high school or less | ||||||
| Some college/technical school | 0.35 | .11–1.07 | .07 | |||
| College degree | 0.48 | .15–1.56 | .22 | |||
| Undergraduate degree | 0.37 | .08–1.67 | .20 | |||
| Graduate degree | 0.71 | .20–2.52 | .59 | |||
| Marital status: single vs ever married | 1.16 | .51–2.65 | .73 | |||
| Sexually transmitted infection | ||||||
| Symptoms since last visit: yes vs no | 1.86 | .75–4.64 | .18 | |||
| History: yes vs no | 4.00 | 1.87–8.56 | .0004 | 2.33 | 1.26–4.31 | .007 |
| Coinfection: yes vs no positive result in medical records | 5.58 | 2.41–12.9 | <.0001 | 5.13 | 2.78–9.49 | <.0001 |
| Since the last visit | ||||||
| Type of sexual partner: men vs women/men and women/no sex | 1.46 | .61–3.53 | .40 | |||
| No. of sexual partners: ≥1 vs none | ||||||
| Male | 1.87 | .24–14.87 | .55 | |||
| New male | 1.47 | .67–3.22 | .34 | |||
| Female | 0.16 | .02–1.00 | .05 | |||
| In the past year | ||||||
| Type of sexual partner: men vs women/men and women/no sex | 3.68 | .75–18.03 | .11 | |||
| No. of new sexual partners: ≥1 vs none | ||||||
| Male | 1.18 | .55–2.52 | .68 | |||
| Female | 0.22 | .04–1.33 | .10 | |||
| Years since HIV diagnosis at study entry: <1 vs ≥1 | 3.56 | 1.72–7.37 | .0006 | 2.33 | 1.45–3.73 | .0004 |
| Years in service: <9 vs ≥9 | ||||||
| At study entry | 1.69 | .80–3.56 | .17 | |||
| At sample collection | 1.59 | .78–3.25 | .20 | |||
| Sensitivity: resistant vs sensitive | ||||||
| Macrolide | 1.12 | .30–4.17 | .87 | |||
| Quinolone | 1.25 | .42–3.70 | .69 | |||
Out of 109 rectal swab specimens from 77 patients with rectal infections, sequencing for antimicrobial resistance failed on 16 swabs from 13 patients. Among the sequenced specimens (56 from 43 patients), 88% (43/49) indicated markers for macrolide resistance, 18% (10/56) for quinolone resistance, and 18% (10/56) for resistance to both. The most common macrolide-associated mutations that were detected were A2058G (n = 21) and A2059G (n = 18; Table 4). Other uncommon mutations were A2058R, A2058T, A2059C (n = 2), and A2059R (n = 1). Quinolone-associated mutations detected for parC were AA84 S to I (n = 6) and S to R (n = 1) and AA87 D to N (n = 3). Among 43 patients whose samples were sequenced, more than half (58%) had repeat infections. A higher proportion of samples with resistance were from repeat infections, especially for macrolides (repeat vs single infection, 79% vs 67%). Patient characteristics did not differ significantly by age, grade, marital status, and education for those whose samples were tested for resistance as compared with patients who were MG positive but not tested (P ≥ .05).
Table 4.
Rectal Samples Positive for Mycoplasma genitalium and Sequenced for Macrolide and/or Fluoroquinolone Resistance Mutations Among Air Force Service Members With HIV and Single or Repeat Infection, 2016–2020
| Single Infection (n = 18) | Repeat Infection (n = 38) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | |
| Main macrolide resistance, rRNA 23S | ||||
| Not tested | 2 | 11 | 6 | 16 |
| Sensitive | 4 | 22 | 2 | 5 |
| Resistant | 12 | 67 | 30 | 79 |
| A2058G | 5 | 15 | ||
| A2058R | 1 | 0 | ||
| A2058T | 1 | 0 | ||
| A2059G | 5 | 13 | ||
| A2059C | 0 | 2 | ||
| A2059R | 1 | 0 | ||
| Quinolone resistance, parC | ||||
| Not tested | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sensitive | 15 | 83 | 30 | 79 |
| Resistant | 2 | 11 | 8 | 21 |
| S84I | 1 | 5 | ||
| S84R | 1 | 0 | ||
| D87N | 0 | 3 | ||
| Macrolide and quinolone resistance | ||||
| 23S | 10 | 56 | 22 | 58 |
| 23S and parC | 2 | 11 | 8 | 21 |
| Other macrolide targetsa | ||||
| L4 amino acid change | ||||
| Not tested | 9 | 23 | ||
| N172S | 2 | 1 | ||
| A172T | 1 | 0 | ||
| A114V | 0 | 1 | ||
| T204A | 0 | 1 | ||
| L210F | 1 | 0 | ||
| K66E | 0 | 1 | ||
| H69R | 1 | 5 | ||
| None | 4 | 6 | ||
| L22 amino acid change | ||||
| Not tested | 10 | 30 | ||
| S100F | 0 | 1 | ||
| None | 8 | 7 | ||
aAdditional macrolide resistance genes center on the L4 and L22 proteins of the ribosomal complex. These mutations have been associated with resistance in other species of bacteria, though not directly with M genitalium. L4 protein has shown low-level macrolide resistance in Mollicutes such as M pneumoniae [24]. All other amino acid changes in L4 and L22 are noted but have not to date shown resistance in the literature.
DISCUSSION
The prevalence of MG infection was 18.6% among the first 102 US Air Force service members with HIV in a prior analysis of this enhanced surveillance project. In this follow-up analysis, which included an additional 197 male service members with HIV, a similar baseline prevalence of MG was identified (19.7%). The incidence rate was 10.8 cases per 100 person-years among service members who tested negative at baseline. Macrolide or quinolone resistance was commonly identified (88% and 18%, respectively) among almost half the patients with MG-positive specimens that were sequenced.
Although studies of MG infection among men with HIV are limited, estimates in this analysis are comparable to those from other developed countries. The prevalence and incidence of MG were 20.3% and 19.5 cases per 100 person-years, respectively, among 148 men who have sex with men (MSM) with primary HIV screened in a prospective study in Zurich, Switzerland, and 21% among 48 MSM with HIV who sought care at STI or HIV clinics for proctitis in Melbourne, Australia; incidence was not assessed in the latter study [27, 28].
Recent diagnosis of HIV was associated with repeat MG infection in this analysis, suggesting a link to a weakened immune system. In 1 review, MG prevalence was highest among patients with AIDS (43.7%), with a markedly lower burden among asymptomatic persons with HIV (27.3%) and uninfected individuals (11.3%) [29]. In other studies, MG infection has been bidirectionally associated with HIV, found to increase shedding of HIV DNA, and thought to facilitate HIV transmission in women by compromising the epithelial lining of the urogenital tract and to increase susceptibility of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to HIV [29–32]. The role of MG infection in men is unclear, although it is postulated that inflammation of the rectal mucosa due to MG infection may increase the presence of HIV-susceptible cells in men without HIV and facilitate HIV acquisition [27].
In this analysis, self-reported STI history and STI coinfection were associated with repeat MG infection. Coinfection with other STIs or infection with a single STI increases the risk of a subsequent STI and the risk of HIV [30, 33, 34]. Furthermore, these and factors such as recent macrolide use and male-to-male sexual contact have been associated with macrolide/fluoroquinolone-associated resistance mutations [34–37]. Moreover, MSM with recurrent STIs had a higher prevalence of MG infections and antibiotic resistance-associated mutations. It has been suggested that the higher prevalence of mutations may be due to an increased chance of antimicrobial selection pressure from treatment of co-occurring STIs, such as chlamydia or gonorrhea, in populations at high risk of STI, such as MSM [34]. Single-dose azithromycin was part of the recommended treatment for chlamydia or gonorrhea infection before a change in guidelines in 2021 to treating nonpregnant individuals with doxycycline for 7 days [15, 38].
Resistance to macrolides or fluoroquinolones in this analysis were 88% and 18%, respectively, among 43% of patients with MG whose samples were sequenced. These estimates are comparable to the reported prevalence (68.4%–90.5%) among high-risk populations, such as clinic attendees seeking care for nongonococcal urethritis, cervicitis, or proctitis and MSM seeking STI testing [34, 39–41]. Globally, macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in MG increased at least 5-fold in a decade. The overall prevalence of macrolide resistance across 21 countries increased from 2010 (10%) to 2016–2017 (51.4%), whereas the prevalence of resistance associated with fluoroquinolone (7.7%) did not vary markedly over time [42]. Comparatively, the prevalence of macrolide resistance in the Americas increased even more from 0% to 67.3% in the same period. Similarly, the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in the Americas region of the World Health Organization was higher at 10.1% for the 2013–2017 period. These data emphasize the alarming rise of macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in MG, particularly among patients with MG, mirroring trends observed in high-risk populations.
A limitation of this analysis was that samples from less than half of patients with detected MG were sequenced due to resource limitations or sample unavailability. However, the preliminary finding—specifically, a higher proportion of repeat infection samples having resistance in combination with the association of STI history and coinfection with repeat MG—suggests that treatment of prior or concurrent bacterial STIs may play a role in development of resistance in MG strains. Alternatively, resistant MG strains may have been sexually transmitted from an infected sexual partner.
In this initial study evaluating resistant strains of MG among US military service members with HIV, prevalence of macrolide and/or fluoroquinolone resistance was commonly found in rectal specimens, especially for repeat positive samples. New diagnosis of HIV, STI history, and/or co-occurrence was associated with the detection of repeat MG. Further investigation is needed to fully understand the complex interplay of factors contributing to repeat MG diagnosis in men with HIV. This includes exploring the mechanisms by which STI coinfection may influence resistance development and the transmission dynamics of resistant MG strains. Determining the utility of testing for co-occurring MG and its resistance profile alongside common STIs, such as chlamydia or gonorrhea, at HIV diagnosis may be valuable for guiding more effective treatment strategies.
Contributor Information
Shilpa Hakre, Emerging Infectious Diseases Branch, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; United States Military HIV Research Program, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Eric Sanders-Buell, United States Military HIV Research Program, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Rosemary O Casimier, Emerging Infectious Diseases Branch, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Anne Marie O’Sullivan, United States Military HIV Research Program, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sheila A Peel, Diagnostics and Countermeasures Branch, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Sodsai Tovanabutra, United States Military HIV Research Program, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Paul T Scott, Emerging Infectious Diseases Branch, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Jason F Okulicz, Infectious Disease Service, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
Notes
Acknowledgments. We thank Elizabeth J. Bianchi and Erifile Zografos for data entry; Catherine Stewart for diagnostic testing; Meera Bose, Morgan DiGiorgio, Rachel Loney, Kelly Parisi, and Meghan Waters for sequencing; and Joanna Freeman and Christopher Schoening for laboratory data exports.
Data availability. Sequences described here have been submitted to GenBank, a publicly available database of genetic sequences, under accession numbers PP910697–PP910751 for parC and PP937693–PP937741 for 23S rRNA.
Disclaimer. Material has been reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. There is no objection to its presentation and/or publication. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting true views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense, Ministry of Health (Jordan), or the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. The investigators have adhered to the policies for protection of human subjects as prescribed in AR 70-25.
Financial support. This work was supported in part by US Army Medical Research and Development Command, Diagnostics and Countermeasures Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (contracts W81XWH-16-C-0225 and W81XWH-16-C-0337); and by the US Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, under cooperative agreements (W81XWH-11-2-0174 and W81XWH-18-2-0040) between the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, and the US Department of Defense.
References
- 1. Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61:418–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Taylor-Robinson D, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: from chrysalis to multicolored butterfly. Clin Microbiol Rev 2011; 24:498–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Horner PJ, Martin DH. Mycoplasma genitalium infection in men. J Infect Dis 2017; 216:S396–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jensen JS, Cusini M, Gomberg M, Moi H, Wilson J, Unemo M. 2021 European guideline on the management of Mycoplasma genitalium infections. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:641–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sonnenberg P, Ison CA, Clifton S, et al. Epidemiology of Mycoplasma genitalium in British men and women aged 16–44 years: evidence from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). Int J Epidemiol 2015; 44:1982–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Torrone EA, Kruszon-Moran D, Philips C, et al. Prevalence of urogenital Mycoplasma genitalium infection, United States, 2017 to 2018. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48:e160–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Manhart LE, Gaydos CA, Taylor SN, et al. Characteristics of Mycoplasma genitalium urogenital infections in a diverse patient sample from the United States: results from the Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium Evaluation Study (AMES). J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58:e00165-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Baumann L, Cina M, Egli-Gany D, et al. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in different population groups: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2018; 94:255–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sokoll PR, Migliavaca CB, Siebert U, Schmid D, Arvandi M. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium infection among HIV PrEP users: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2023; 99:351–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bachmann LH, Kirkcaldy RD, Geisler WM, et al. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium infection, antimicrobial resistance mutations, and symptom resolution following treatment of urethritis. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71:e624–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Seña AC, Lee JY, Schwebke J, et al. A silent epidemic: the prevalence, incidence and persistence of Mycoplasma genitalium among young, asymptomatic high-risk women in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67:73–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Manhart LE, Leipertz G, Soge OO, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium in the US (MyGeniUS): surveillance data from sexual health clinics in 4 US regions. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 77:1449–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Soni S, Alexander S, Verlander N, et al. The prevalence of urethral and rectal Mycoplasma genitalium and its associations in men who have sex with men attending a genitourinary medicine clinic. Sex Transm Infect 2010; 86:21–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Workowski KA, Bolan GA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64:1–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021: Mycoplasma genitalium. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/mycoplasmagenitalium.htm. Accessed 19 December 2023.
- 16. Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Hamasuna R. Azithromycin treatment failure in Mycoplasma genitalium–positive patients with nongonococcal urethritis is associated with induced macrolide resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47:1546–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Li Y, Le WJ, Li S, Cao YP, Su XH. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of moxifloxacin in treating Mycoplasma genitalium infection. Int J STD AIDS 2017; 28:1106–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Korzeniewski K, Juszczak D, Paul P. Sexually transmitted infections in the military environment. Int Marit Health 2020; 71:207–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Horseman TS, Crecelius EM, Miller MA, et al. Prevalence and epidemiology of Mycoplasma genitalium in a Pacific-region military population. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48:578–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Romo ML, Moreland SC, Yates AM, et al. Prevalence of urogenital Mycoplasma genitalium infection at two US army medical facilities. Sex Transm Dis 2024; 51:367–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hakre S, Casimier RO, Danboise BA, et al. Enhanced sexually transmitted infection screening for Mycoplasma genitalium in human immunodeficiency virus–infected US Air Force personnel. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:1585–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Baseman JB, Dallo SF, Tully JG, Rose DL. Isolation and characterization of Mycoplasma genitalium strains from the human respiratory tract. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26:2266–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Shimada Y, Deguchi T, Nakane K, et al. Emergence of clinical strains of Mycoplasma genitalium harbouring alterations in ParC associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 36:255–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Pereyre S, Guyot C, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bébéar C, Bébéar CM. In vitro selection and characterization of resistance to macrolides and related antibiotics in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:460–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Tagg KA, Jeoffreys NJ, Couldwell DL, Donald JA, Gilbert GL. Fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:2245–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Andersen PK, Gill RD. Cox's regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. Ann Stat 1982; 10:1100–20. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bissessor M, Tabrizi SN, Bradshaw CS, et al. The contribution of Mycoplasma genitalium to the aetiology of sexually acquired infectious proctitis in men who have sex with men. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22:260–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ring A, Balakrishna S, Imkamp F, et al. High rates of asymptomatic Mycoplasma genitalium infections with high proportion of genotypic resistance to first-line macrolide treatment among men who have sex with men enrolled in the Zurich Primary HIV Infection Study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Napierala Mavedzenge S, Weiss HA. Association of Mycoplasma genitalium and HIV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS 2009; 23:611–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Asare K, Osman F, Ngcapu S, et al. Burden of sexually transmitted infections from acute HIV infection among women in South Africa: evidence from a prospective cohort study. Ann Epidemiol 2022; 74:132–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Manhart LE, Mostad SB, Baeten JM, Astete SG, Mandaliya K, Totten PA. High Mycoplasma genitalium organism burden is associated with shedding of HIV-1 DNA from the cervix. J Infect Dis 2008; 197:733–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Das K, De la Garza G, Siwak EB, Scofield VL, Dhandayuthapani S. Mycoplasma genitalium promotes epithelial crossing and peripheral blood mononuclear cell infection by HIV-1. Int J Infect Dis 2014; 23:31–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Peterman TA, Tian LH, Metcalf CA, et al. High incidence of new sexually transmitted infections in the year following a sexually transmitted infection: a case for rescreening. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145:564–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. De Baetselier I, Vuylsteke B, Reyniers T, et al. Worryingly high prevalence of resistance-associated mutations to macrolides and fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma genitalium among men who have sex with men with recurrent sexually transmitted infections. Int J STD AIDS 2022; 33:385–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Li Y, Su X, Le W, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium in symptomatic male urethritis: macrolide use is associated with increased resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 70:805–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. de Salazar A, Barrientos-Durán A, Espadafor B, Fuentes-López A, Chueca N, Garcia F. Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance of Mycoplasma genitalium in southern Spain, 2018–2019. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97:8–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. DiMarco DE, Urban MA, McGowan JP, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium management in adults. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University, 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2015. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Read TRH, Fairley CK, Murray GL, et al. Outcomes of resistance-guided sequential treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infections: a prospective evaluation. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 68:554–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Couldwell DL, Jalocon D, Power M, Jeoffreys NJ, Chen SC, Lewis DA. Mycoplasma genitalium: high prevalence of resistance to macrolides and frequent anorectal infection in men who have sex with men in western Sydney. Sex Transm Infect 2018; 94:406–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Spornraft-Ragaller P, Dumke R. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of rectal Mollicutes in HIV-infected men who have sex with men at the university hospital of Dresden, Germany. Infection 2020; 48:259–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Machalek DA, Tao Y, Shilling H, et al. Prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma genitalium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20:1302–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


