Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1996 Aug;53(8):559–566. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.8.559

Comparison of dust related respiratory effects in Dutch and Canadian grain handling industries: a pooled analysis.

S J Peelen 1, D Heederik 1, H D Dimich-Ward 1, M Chan-Yeung 1, S M Kennedy 1
PMCID: PMC1128540  PMID: 8983468

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Four previously conducted epidemiological studies in more than 1200 grain workers were used to compare exposure-response relations between exposure to grain dust and respiratory health. METHODS: The studies included Dutch workers from an animal feed mill and a transfer grain elevator and Canadian workers from a terminal grain elevator and the docks. Relations between forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and exposure were analysed with multiple regression analysis corrected for smoking, age, and height. Exposure variables examined included cumulative and current dust exposure and the numbers of years a subject was employed in the industry. Sampling efficiencies of the Dutch and Canadian measurement techniques were compared in a pilot study. Results of this study were used to correct slopes of exposure-response relations for differences in dust fractions sampled by Dutch and Canadian personal dust samplers. RESULTS: Negative exposure-response relations were shown for regressions of FEV1 on cumulative and current exposure and years employed. Slopes of the exposure-response relations differed by a factor of three to five between industries, apart from results for cumulative exposure. Here the variation in slopes differed by a factor of 100, from -1 to -0.009 ml/mg.y/m3. The variation in slopes between industries reduced to between twofold to fivefold when the Dutch transfer elevator workers were not considered. There was evidence that the small exposure-response slope found for this group is caused by misclassification of exposure and a strong healthy worker effect. Alternative, but less likely explanations for the variation in slopes were differences in exposure concentrations, composition of grain dust, exposure characteristics, and measurement techniques. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study showed moderately similar negative exposure-response relations for four different populations from different countries, despite differences in methods of exposure assessment and exposure estimation.

Full text

PDF
559

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Broder I., Corey P., Davies G., Hutcheon M., Mintz S., Inouye T., Hyland R., Leznoff A., Thomas P. Longitudinal study of grain elevator and control workers with demonstration of healthy worker effect. J Occup Med. 1985 Dec;27(12):873–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchan R. M., Soderholm S. C., Tillery M. I. Aerosol sampling efficiency of 37 mm filter cassettes. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Dec;47(12):825–831. doi: 10.1080/15298668691390728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan-Yeung M., Wong R., MacLean L. Respiratory abnormalities among grain elevator workers. Chest. 1979 Apr;75(4):461–467. doi: 10.1378/chest.75.4.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corey P., Hutcheon M., Broder I., Mintz S. Grain elevator workers show work-related pulmonary function changes and dose-effect relationships with dust exposure. Br J Ind Med. 1982 Nov;39(4):330–337. doi: 10.1136/oem.39.4.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cotton D. J., Graham B. L., Li K. Y., Froh F., Barnett G. D., Dosman J. A. Effects of grain dust exposure and smoking on respiratory symptoms and lung function. J Occup Med. 1983 Feb;25(2):131–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cotton D. J., Graham B. L., Li K. Y., Froh F., Barnett G. D., Dosman J. A. Effects of smoking and occupational exposure on peripheral airway function in young cereal grain workers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Oct;126(4):660–665. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.4.660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crapo R. O., Morris A. H., Gardner R. M. Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Jun;123(6):659–664. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.6.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dimich-Ward H. D., Kennedy S. M., Dittrick M. A., DyBuncio A., Chan-Yeung M. Evaluation of the respiratory health of dock workers who load grain cargoes in British Columbia. Occup Environ Med. 1995 Apr;52(4):273–278. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.4.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dopico G. A., Reddan W., Tsiatis A., Peters M. E., Rankin J. Epidemiologic study of clinical and physiologic parameters in grain handlers of northern United States. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Nov;130(5):759–765. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.5.759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dosman J. A., Cotton D. J., Graham B. L., Li K. Y., Froh F., Barnett G. D. Chronic bronchitis and decreased forced expiratory flow rates in lifetime nonsmoking grain workers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Jan;121(1):11–16. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.121.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. James A. L., Zimmerman M. J., Ee H., Ryan G., Musk A. W. Exposure to grain dust and changes in lung function. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Jul;47(7):466–472. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.7.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kennedy S. M., Christiani D. C., Eisen E. A., Wegman D. H., Greaves I. A., Olenchock S. A., Ye T. T., Lu P. L. Cotton dust and endotoxin exposure-response relationships in cotton textile workers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Jan;135(1):194–200. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1987.135.1.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kennedy S. M., Dimich-Ward H., Desjardins A., Kassam A., Vedal S., Chan-Yeung M. Respiratory health among retired grain elevator workers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Jul;150(1):59–65. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.1.8025773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moira C. Y., Enarson D. A., Kennedy S. M. The impact of grain dust on respiratory health. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Feb;145(2 Pt 1):476–487. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.2_Pt_1.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smid T., Heederik D., Houba R., Quanjer P. H. Dust- and endotoxin-related respiratory effects in the animal feed industry. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Dec;146(6):1474–1479. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.6.1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smid T., Heederik D., Mensink G., Houba R., Boleij J. S. Exposure to dust, endotoxins, and fungi in the animal feed industry. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992 Jun;53(6):362–368. doi: 10.1080/15298669291359780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zuskin E., Mataija M., Pokrajac D., Schachter E. N., Witek T. J., Jr Respiratory function in animal food processing workers. Am J Ind Med. 1989;16(2):179–187. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700160209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES