Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1996 Nov;53(11):748–752. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.11.748

Airway responsiveness, respiratory symptoms, and exposures to soluble oil mist in mechanical workers.

N Massin 1, A B Bohadana 1, P Wild 1, P Goutet 1, H Kirstetter 1, J P Toamain 1
PMCID: PMC1128592  PMID: 9038798

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relation between measured levels of exposure to soluble oil mists in a plant manufacturing ball bearings, and both respiratory symptoms and airway responsiveness in the workforce. METHODS: 114 male workers exposed to oil mist and 55 unexposed male controls from nearby factories were studied. Soluble oil mist concentrations were measured with area samplers. Respiratory symptoms were assessed by questionnaire and measurement of airway responsiveness to methacholine with an abbreviated method. Subjects were labelled positive to methacholine airway challenge (MAC+) if forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) fell by > or = 20%. The linear dose-response slope was calculated as the percentage fall in FEV1 at the last dose divided by the total dose given. RESULTS: Geometric mean concentrations of oil mists ranged from 0.65 mg/m3 (GSD 1.29) to 2.20 mg/m3 (GSD 1.55) based on 92 measurements obtained from 1979-93. The prevalence of chronic cough or phlegm, bouts of bronchitis, and dyspnoea was greater among exposed workers than among controls (odds ratio (OR) 4.64, P = 0.002 for chronic cough and phlegm). After adjustment for smoking and age, dyspnoea was significantly related to an index of cumulative exposure to oil mist (OR 1.44, P = 0.006/10 y.mg/m3). The proportion of MAC+ subjects was similar in the two groups. However, after adjustment for baseline FEV1 and age, the dose-response slope was significantly steeper among exposed workers than among controls (P = 0.01), a finding indicating airway hyperresponsiveness in the exposed workers. Furthermore, the dose-response slope was significantly related to baseline FEV1, age, and, after adjustment for FEV1, the index of cumulative exposure to oil (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Subjects with exposure to soluble oil mist in the metal industry are at risk of developing both respiratory symptoms and airway hyperresponsiveness.

Full text

PDF
748

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ATS statement--Snowbird workshop on standardization of spirometry. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 May;119(5):831–838. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.119.5.831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameille J., Wild P., Choudat D., Ohl G., Vaucouleur J. F., Chanut J. C., Brochard P. Respiratory symptoms, ventilatory impairment, and bronchial reactivity in oil mist-exposed automobile workers. Am J Ind Med. 1995 Feb;27(2):247–256. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohadana A. B., Massin N., Wild P., Kolopp M. N., Toamain J. P. Respiratory symptoms and airway responsiveness in apparently healthy workers exposed to flour dust. Eur Respir J. 1994 Jun;7(6):1070–1076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hargreave F. E., Dolovich J., O'Byrne P. M., Ramsdale E. H., Daniel E. E. The origin of airway hyperresponsiveness. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):825–832. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(86)90226-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hendy M. S., Beattie B. E., Burge P. S. Occupational asthma due to an emulsified oil mist. Br J Ind Med. 1985 Jan;42(1):51–54. doi: 10.1136/oem.42.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Järvholm B., Bake B., Lavenius B., Thiringer G., Vokmann R. Respiratory symptoms and lung function in oil mist-exposed workers. J Occup Med. 1982 Jun;24(6):473–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kennedy S. M., Greaves I. A., Kriebel D., Eisen E. A., Smith T. J., Woskie S. R. Acute pulmonary responses among automobile workers exposed to aerosols of machining fluids. Am J Ind Med. 1989;15(6):627–641. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700150603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lam S., Wong R., Yeung M. Nonspecific bronchial reactivity in occupational asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1979 Jan;63(1):28–34. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(79)90158-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Massin N., Bohadana A. B., Wild P., Kolopp-Sarda M. N., Toamain J. P. Airway responsiveness to methacholine, respiratory symptoms, and dust exposure levels in grain and flour mill workers in eastern France. Am J Ind Med. 1995 Jun;27(6):859–869. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. O'Connor G., Sparrow D., Taylor D., Segal M., Weiss S. Analysis of dose-response curves to methacholine. An approach suitable for population studies. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Dec;136(6):1412–1417. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.6.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Quanjer P. H., Tammeling G. J., Cotes J. E., Pedersen O. F., Peslin R., Yernault J. C. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993 Mar;16:5–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robertson A. S., Weir D. C., Burge P. S. Occupational asthma due to oil mists. Thorax. 1988 Mar;43(3):200–205. doi: 10.1136/thx.43.3.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES