Skip to main content
Journal of Hematology & Oncology logoLink to Journal of Hematology & Oncology
letter
. 2024 Jul 29;17:57. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01575-0

Novel natural killer cell-based therapies for hematologic and solid malignancies: latest updates from ASCO 2024

Xubo Gong 1,#, Lianjun Zhang 2,#, Xin He 2, Jing Yang 3, Xiang Li 1, Weiwei Liu 1, Bin Zhang 2,, Zhihua Tao 1,, Wenbin Qian 3,
PMCID: PMC11287938  PMID: 39075582

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cell-based therapies have made great progress in treating both hematological and solid tumors. Their unique mechanism of action does not rely on antigen presentation to recognize and eliminate tumor cells, making them a promising approach for cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we present a comprehensive summary of the latest clinical data of the novel NK cell-based therapies from the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, highlighting the potential of these advancements to revolutionize the treatment of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.

Keywords: Natural killer cell, Solid tumor, Lymphoma, Relapsed or refractory tumor

To the editor

Unlike T cells, Natural killer (NK) cells could recognize and eliminate malignant cells independent of antigen presentation, making them particularly effective against various types of tumors [1]. This review summarizes the latest clinical findings of novel NK cell-based therapies as presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.

Adoptive transfer of modified NK cell

One Phase I/II study [2] evaluated the efficacy of modified NK cells, resistant to TGFβ-induced suppression and expanded from a universal donor pool, in combination with irinotecan, temozolomide, and dinutuximab in children with relapsed or refractory (R/R) neuroblastoma. After administration of up to six cycles of treatment, 75% of patients achieved a partial response (PR). It manifests that the treatment strategy is safe and feasible, with early objective responses noted in the preliminary patient cohort.

NK cell engager

AFM24 is a bispecific, tetravalent innate cell engager binding CD16a on NK cells and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on solid tumors. AFM24 combined with atezolizumab was assessed in patients with EGFR-WT non-small cell lung cancer [3]. After a median duration of 14.4 weeks, the objective response rate (ORR) was 26.7%, and no unexpected toxicities were observed compared to each single agent. It demonstrates that this combination is well-tolerated and shows a manageable safety profile in these patients.

Cytokine-based NK cell activation

The safety and tolerability of JCXH-211, a self-replicating mRNA encoding IL-12, were assessed in patients with malignant solid tumors in a phase I study [4]. Patients were administrated across three dose levels, and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 10% of patients. It reveals a favorable safety profile, and antitumor activities in the heavily pretreated late-stage patients.

Another phase I/IIa study [5] evaluated GI-102, a novel CD80-IgG4-IL2V3 fusion protein driving robust proliferation and activation of NK cells, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The ORR was 17.4%, and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were found in 15.6% of patients. It shows that GI-102 is well tolerated with meaningful monotherapy activity in patients who failed on standard of care.

LTC004, a novel IL-2Rβ/γ cytokine agonist designed to minimize toxicity with improved potency, was assessed in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors [6]. No dose-limiting toxicities was observed. The ORR was 5.9%, and the disease control rate was 58.8%. It demonstrates encouraging anti-tumor efficacy and is well tolerated in patients enrolled.

NK cell activation by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)

Lacutamab, an ICI targeting killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 3DL2 (KIR3DL2), was assessed in patients with R/R mycosis fungoides. With a median follow-up of 11.8 months, the ORR was 22.4%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months. Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were observed in 3.7% of patients [7]. It substantiates the promising clinical efficacy of lacutamab, with a favorable safety and tolerability profile among these patients.

Elotuzumab is a signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 (SLAMF7) checkpoint inhibitor. A phase Ib/II trial [8] evaluated the combination of elotuzumab and belantamab mafodotin in patients with R/R myeloma. The PR was 40%, and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 30% of patients. It shows an encouraging safety profile and a promising preliminary efficacy.

IMM0306, which activates NK cells via blockade of CD47-SIRPa interaction and FcɣR engagement, achieved an ORR of 30.3% in patients with R/R CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [9]. The median PFS was 10.58 months, and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 68.8% of patients. It indicates that IMM0306 is well-tolerated and has promising preliminary anti-tumor activity especially in patients with R/R follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma.

Of note, dual ICI with pembrolizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) and favezelimab (a lymphocyte-activation gene 3 inhibitor) was evaluated in patients with anti-PD-1-naive R/R classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma [10]. With a median follow-up of 36.9 months, the ORR was 83%. The median PFS was 19.4 months, and 24-month overall survival rate was 93%. Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 23% of patients. It demonstrates sustained antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients studied.

In conclusion, 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting underscored substantial advancements in NK cell-based therapies, including adoptive transfer of modified NK cells, NK cell engagers, cytokine- and ICI-based NK activation (Tables 1 and 2) strategies, highlighting their potential to revolutionize tumor treatment and offering optimism for patients with R/R tumors.

Table 1.

Advancements of NK cell transfer, NK cell engagers and Cytokine-based NK cell activation for hematologic and solid tumors

Type of therapy Adoptive NK cell transfer NK cell engagers Cytokine-based NK cell activation
Authors (reference) Ranalli [2] Kim [3] Le [4] Lee [5] Gong [6]
Trial identifier (Phase) NCT04211675 (II) NCT05109442 (I/II) NCT05727839 (I) NCT05824975 (I/II) NCT05666635 (I)
Agents UD-TGFβi NK cells + irinotecan + temozolomide + dinutuximab AFM24 (a bispecific, tetravalent innate cell engager) + atezolizumab JCXH-211, a self-replicating mRNA encoding IL-12 GI-102 (CD80-IL2v3) LTC004, a novel IL-2Rβ/γ cytokine agonist
Malignancy R/R Neuroblastoma EGFR -WT non-small cell lung cancer Malignant solid tumors Advanced or metastatic solid tumors Advanced solid tumors
Patient number 4 17 10 32 17
Male N/A 82.4% N/A N/A N/A
Median Age and (or) range (years) 7–11 66(45–75) N/A N/A N/A
Clinical trial design 21-day cycles of CIT as per COG protocol ANBL1221 with UD-TGFbi NK cells (1 × 108 cells/kg) infused on day 8 Phase 2 dose of 480 mg AFM24 was given IV weekly in combination with 840 mg atezolizumab IV fortnightly JCXH-211 at 5, 25, 50, and 100 mg were given Q4W. Dose Limiting Toxicities were monitored for 28 days after first dose GI-102 was administered IV Q3W until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities Dose escalation part assessed safety and tolerability of LTC004 with doses ranging from 3.0 to 360 µg/kg IV Q3W
Median Follow-up (months) N/A 5.5 N/A N/A N/A
Response rate PR 75% ORR 26.7% NA ORR 17.4% ORR 5.9%, DCR 58.5%
Survival N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Summary It could be safely and feasibly administered to children with R/R NBL after treatment with CIT It shows remarkable signs of clinical efficacy, even in patients with resistance to prior CPI, and a well-tolerated and manageable safety profile It demonstrates good safety profile. Antitumor activities were observed in the heavily pretreated late-stage patients GI-102 is well tolerated up to dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W, in patients who failed on standard of care It shows encouraging anti-tumor efficacy, and well tolerated in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

CIT chemoimmunotherapy, CPI checkpoint inhibitor, DCR, disease control rate, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, IV intravenously, LAG-3 lymphocyte-activation gene 3, N/A not available, NBL Neuroblastoma, NHL non-Hodgkin lymphoma, NK Natural killer, NKG2A NK cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C member 1, ORR objective response rate, PR partial response, Q3W, once every 3 weeks, R/R relapsed or refractory, TGFβi TGFβ-induced suppression, UD universal donor, WT wide type

Table 2.

Advancements of NK cell activation immune checkpoint inhibitor for hematologic and solid tumors

Type of therapy NK cell activation via immune checkpoint inhibitors
Authors (reference) Porcu [7] Browning [8] Yang [9] Timmerman [10]
Trial identifier (Phase) NCT03902184 (II) NCT05002816 (I/II) NCT05805943 (I) NCT03598608 (I/II)
Agents Lacutamab, an ICI of KIR3DL2 Elotuzumab(an ICI of SLAMF7) + belantamab mafodotin IMM0306, a fusion protein of CD20 with the CD47 binding domain of SIRPa Favezelimab (anti–LAG-3 monoclonal antibody) + pembrolizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor)
Malignancy R/R mycosis fungoides R/R MM R/R CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma R/R classical Hodgkin lymphoma
Patient number 107 12 48 30
Male N/A N/A 30% N/A
Median Age and (or) range (years) 62 66.5 (59–79) 56 N/A
Clinical trial design Lacutamab 750 mg was administered as an IV infusion until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity Elotuzumab 10 mg/kg IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22 every 28 days for cycles 1 and 2; followed by 20 mg/kg on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. Belantamab mafodotin IV with the starting dose of 1.9 mg/kg IV at every 4-week interval IMM0306 was administered at escalating doses of 0.04, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 mg/kg IV once a week until disease progression or intolerable toxicity Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W plus favezelimab 200 mg starting dose, then dose escalation to 800 mg IV Q3W; and a dose expansion phase (pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus favezelimab 800 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles)
Median Follow-up (months) 11.8 N/A N/A 36.9
Response rate ORR 22.4% PR 40% ORR 30.3% ORR 83%
Survival Median PFS 10.2 months N/A Median PFS 10.58 months Median PFS 19.4 months, 24-month OS rate 93%
Summary It confirms promising clinical activity of lacutamab, with a favorable safety and tolerability profile The combination indicates an encouraging safety profile and a promising preliminary efficacy in those patients IMM0306 is well-tolerated and with promising preliminary anti-tumor activity especially in patients with R/R FL and MZL It demonstrates sustained antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients studied

CPI checkpoint inhibitors, FL follicular lymphoma, IV intravenously, KIR3DL2 Killer cell immunoglobulin like receptor 3DL2, MM multiple myeloma, MZL: marginal zone lymphoma, N/A not available, NK Natural killer, ORR objective response rate, PFS: progression-free survival, PR partial response, Q4W once every 4 weeks, Q3W once every 3 weeks, R/R relapsed or refractory

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to many specialists in the field whose seminal works are not cited due to space constraints. We would like to express my gratitude to all those who helped us during the writing of this review.

Abbreviations

CAR

Chimeric antigen receptor

CIT

Chemoimmunotherapy

CR

Complete remission

EGFR

Epidermal growth factor receptor

FL

Follicular lymphoma

MZL

Marginal zone lymphoma

IV

Intravenously

ICI

Immune checkpoint inhibitor

KIR3DL2

Killer cell immunoglobulin like receptor 3DL2

LAG-3

Lymphocyte-activation gene 3

MLA

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma

NBL

Neuroblastoma

NHL

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

NK

Natural killer

NKG2A

NK cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C member 1

ORR

Objective response rate

OS

Overall survival

PR

Partial response

PFS

Progression-free survival

Q3W

Once every 3 weeks

R/R

Relapsed or refractory

TROP2

Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2

TGFbi

TGFb-induced suppression

UD

Universal donor

WT

Wide type

Author contributions

X.G., L.Z., X.H., B.Z., Z.T., and W.Q. were the principal investigators. X.G. drafted the manuscript. L.Z., H.X., W.L., and W.L. prepared the tables. All authors participated in the process of drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81400107 and 82350104), and Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Project (2022RC154).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Xubo Gong, Lianjun Zhang these authors contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Bin Zhang, Email: bzhang@coh.org.

Zhihua Tao, Email: zrtzh@zju.edu.cn.

Wenbin Qian, Email: qianwb@zju.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Lamers-Kok N, Panella D, Georgoudaki AM, Liu H, Özkazanc D, Kučerová L, et al. Natural killer cells in clinical development as non-engineered, engineered, and combination therapies. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):164. 10.1186/s13045-022-01382-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ranalli MA, Shah N, Skeens M, Streby KA, Lamb M, Cole LA, et al. Preliminary experience of ex-vivo expanded allogeneic universal donor TGFβi NK cell infusions in combination with irinotecan, temozolomide, and dinutuximab in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: the Allo - STING trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16suppl):10005. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.10005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim HR, Saavedra O, Cervantes A, Lugowska IA, Oberoi A, El-Khoueiry AB et al. Preliminary results from the phase 2 study of AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab in patients with EGFR wild-type (EGFR-WT) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16_suppl):2522.
  • 4.Le NT. A phase I study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of JCXH-211 (a self-replicating mRNA encoding IL-12) intratumoral injection in patients with malignant solid tumors: results from the phase Ia dose escalation. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16suppl):2539. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.2539 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee J, Cho EC, Lee JL, Lee JY, Ma WW, Adjei AA, et al. A first-in-human, phase 1/2a study of GI-102 (CD80-IL2v3) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: initial results from dose escalation. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16suppl):2598. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.2598 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gong J, Shen L, Zang A, Zhou H, Tang J, Liu D, et al. A phase I open-label study of a novel IL-2Rβ/γ cytokine agonist, LTC004, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16suppl):2652. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.2652 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Porcu P, Bagot M, Ram-Wolff C, Kim YH, Huen A, Dalle S, et al. Lacutamab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory mycosis fungoides: results from the TELLOMAK phase 2 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16suppl):7082. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7082 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Browning S, Li F, Parker TL, Bar N, Anderson T, Stevens E, et al. Open-label, single-arm phase Ib/II study of immune combination therapy with elotuzumab and belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16suppl):7559. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7559 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang J, Song Y, Zhou K, Li Z, Zhang M, Jing H, et al. Preliminary results from a phase I study of IMM0306 in patients with relapsed or refractory CD20-positive B-cell non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16suppl):7060. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Timmerman J, Lavie D, Johnson NA, Avigdor A, Peter B, Andreadis C, et al. A phase 1/2 study of favezelimab in combination with pembrolizumab for heavily pretreated anti–PD-1–refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL): an updated analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16suppl):7056. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7056 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Journal of Hematology & Oncology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES