Abstract
Circadian rhythms are determined by cell-autonomous transcription-translation feedback loops that entrain to environmental stimuli. In the model circadian clock of Drosophila melanogaster, the clock is set by the light-induced degradation of the core oscillator protein Timeless (TIM) by the principal light-sensor Cryptochrome (CRY). The cryo-EM structure of CRY bound to TIM revealed that within the extensive CRY:TIM interface the TIM N-terminus binds into the CRY FAD pocket, in which FAD and the associated phosphate binding loop (PBL) undergo substantial rearrangement. The TIM N-terminus involved in CRY binding varies in isoforms that facilitate adaptation of flies to different light environments. Herein we demonstrate through peptide binding assays and pulsed-dipolar ESR spectroscopy that the TIM N-terminal peptide alone exhibits light-dependent binding to CRY and that the affinity of the interaction depends on the initiating methionine residue. Extensions to the TIM N-terminus that mimic less light-sensitive variants have substantially reduced interaction with CRY. Substitutions of CRY residues that couple to the flavin rearrangement in the CRY:TIM complex have dramatic effects on CRY light activation. CRY residues Arg237 on α8, and Asn253, and Gln254 on the PBL are critical for the release of the CRY autoinhibitory C-terminal tail (CTT) and subsequent TIM binding. These key light-responsive elements of CRY are well conserved throughout Type I cryptochromes of invertebrates, but not by cryptochromes of chordates and plants, which likely utilize a distinct light-activation mechanism.
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
In eukaryotes, circadian clocks are molecular oscillators comprised of transcription-translation feedback loops (TTFLs) that are sensitive to the diurnal cycle through the action of specific photoreceptors1-3. In the so-called “positive arm” of the clock, transcription factor complexes bind to the regulatory elements of clock-controlled genes, promoting the expression of repressor proteins2-4. In the negative arm of the clock, repressor proteins translocate to the nucleus after a delay and inhibit the positive elements from further promoting transcription of their respective genes2,4. As the repressors accumulate in the cytoplasm over the course of a circadian day, they undergo rhythmic post-translational modifications that contribute to their degradation and the re-initiation of the cycle4-7. The molecular architecture of the TTFL is conserved across many species, including fungi, insects and mammals1-3,8.
In the model circadian clock of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, the transcription factors Clock and Cycle (CLK and CYC) form a heterodimeric complex to promote the transcription of period (per) and timeless (tim) genes. PER and TIM heterodimerize, translocate to the nucleus, and inhibit CLK/CYC3. The PER and TIM proteins then undergo post-translational modifications that induce their respective degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. TIM degradation is induced by light through action of the flavoprotein Cryptochrome (CRY).
CRYs are UV-A/blue light photoreceptors that are found across the kingdoms of life3. Structurally, CRYs are closely related to the DNA-repair photolyase (PL) enzymes; they contain an α/β Rossman fold and an α-helical domain that binds flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). A variable CRY C-terminal extension (CCE) distinguishes CRYs from photolyases and each other. In invertebrates, Type I CRYs act as light sensors9. For example, Drosophila CRY, serves as the principal photosensor that entrains the fly rhythm to light10,11-14. The CRY CCE contains a C-terminal tail (CTT) helix that acts as an autoinhibitory element in the dark10,12-15. Upon photoreduction of FAD to the anionic semiquinone (ASQ) the CTT undocks from the FAD binding pocket, allowing CRY to bind TIM12,17. This complex recruits the E3 ubiquitin ligase Jetlag (JET) that then ubiquitinates CRY:TIM and directs the proteins down the proteasomal pathway18,19. Removal of the CTT from CRY (CRYΔ) constitutively activates the protein, and prevents accumulation of TIM in dark or light19-21. CRYΔ has been shown to be stable and bind flavin17,22, however; the biophysical properties of the variant have not been extensively studied.
The cryo-EM structure of CRYΔ in complex with TIM revealed a central core of TIM armadillo (ARM) repeats, of which the N-terminal three repeats form an extensive interface with CRY (Figure 1)23. The N-terminal helix of the first ARM repeat replaces the CTT within the FAD binding pocket and binds in a mode that resembles how photolyases recognize a DNA lesion (Figure 1A). Notably, the initiating Met residue of TIM engages in several hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions within the flavin pocket, adjacent to the cofactor (Figure 1B). Initiator Met residues are often modified in flies24, and although the N-terminal Met is clearly present in the structure, chemical modifications are difficult to discern at the local resolution of ~2.8 Å. Moreover, flies produce a long (L) isoform of TIM (L-TIM) that appends 23 N-terminal residues in response to varied light conditions at different latitudes25,26. L-TIM interacts more weakly than short TIM (S-TIM) with CRY and this attenuated interaction results in reduced photosensitivity of the clock27. The CRY:TIM structure suggests that the addition of residues N-terminal to the initiating Met may indeed alter the ability of CRY to bind to TIM23.
Figure 1.
Binding environment of the TIM N-terminus within CRY. (A) The structure of the CRY:TIM complex (CRYΔ in gold; FAD in gold; TIM in light blue; PDB 8DD7) reveals an extensive interface between the CRY primary flavin pocket and the TIM N-terminal ARM repeats. The first 19 residues of the N-terminus of TIM (circled) replace the CRY CTT by binding into the flavin pocket (closeup is rotated by 90° compared to left view). (B) The initiating Met residue of TIM (light blue; circled) makes extensive contacts at the center of the interface with several highlighted CRY residues.
The CRY flavin pocket undergoes considerable structural rearrangement in binding to the TIM N-terminus. In particular, the diphosphate moiety of FAD changes conformation and a coordinating Mg2+ ion is replaced by Arg237, which shifts to hydrogen bond with the flavin phosphates in concert with a tilt of the α8-helix on which it resides. The so-called “phosphate-binding loop” (PBL, residues 249-263, following CRY α8) collapses into the FAD pocket and restructures the surrounding surface. Asn253 and Gln254 on the PBL hydrogen bond directly with the FAD diphosphate moiety in the complex, whereas they reside at the protein surface in unbound CRY. Although the conformational changes involving Arg237, Asn253 and Gln254 clearly couple to TIM binding, it is unclear if they are promoted by interaction with TIM, result from release of the CTT, or themselves respond to flavin photoreduction.
Herein, we apply a fluorescent peptide binding assay and double electron electron resonance ESR spectroscopy (DEER) to establish that the N-terminal ARM helix of TIM constitutes the essential light-sensitive binding interaction with CRY. Moreover, TIM recognition is indeed sensitive to the nature of the N-terminus, thereby rationalizing the biological impact of the Is-tim polymorphism. In addition, light-dependent TIM recognition involves more than autoinhibition by the CTT because affinity for the TIM N-terminus increases with light in a CRY variant that does not contain the autoinhibitory region (CRYΔ). Surprisingly, Arg237, Asn253 and Gln254 are shown to be critical factors in CTT release, a step that must precede TIM binding. Residue conservation and structural analyses suggest that this light activation mechanisms is specific for Type I invertebrate cryptochromes.
METHODS
Expression and Purification of Full-Length CRY, CRYΔ, Sort-Tagged CRY Variants
Protein expression and purification of full-length Drosophila melanogaster CRY (Uniprot ID: 077059, residues 1-539; unconserved residues 540-542 were deleted to improve expression10,11), CRYΔ (residues 1-520), and sort-tagged constructs were produced in a similar manner as previously described12,17. All constructs were cloned in frame with an N-terminal twin-strep tag and TEV proteolytic cleavage site between NdeI and XhoI in pet28a(+). The deletion of the CTT for CRYΔ was introduced via Kinase-Ligase-DpnI (KLD) reaction (New England BioSciences), the sort-tag (LPGTG) on the C-terminus was introduced via Restriction-Free (RF) cloning, and point mutations were made using QuikChange (Novagen; Arg237Ala) and KLD (New England Biosciences) for Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala. All constructs were expressed in CmpX13 cells, an engineered strain of E. coli with an upregulated riboflavin transporter27, induced with 0.4 mM isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 17 °C when the OD600 reached 0.6-0.8, followed by growth overnight. Proteins were purified in a similar manner as previously reported, except the elution buffer for CRYΔ contained 50 mM HEPES (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 50 mM biotin, and 4 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP-HCl) to mitigate oxidative aggregate formation. The resin used for all CRY-related purifications was the Strep-Tactin XT 4-Flow resin (IBA Life Sciences).
Expression, Purification, and Modification of N-terminal TIM Peptides
The first 19 amino acids of Drosophila melanogaster TIM (MDWLLATPQLYSAFSSLGC; S-TIMN) was fused to the C-terminus of the small ubiquitin like modifier protein (SUMO) in pet28a(+) in frame with a N-terminal (His)6 tag. Deletion of the initiating Met residue for the S-TIMN-NoM construct (DWLLATPQLYSAFSSLGC) was introduced via KLD. Cells were grown in Miller's Luria-Bertani Broth (Difco) at 37 °C and induced with 0.4 mM IPTG at 25 °C when the OD600 reached 0.6-0.8, after which they continued to grow overnight. The cells were harvested and sonicated in lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM imidazole, and 1 μL of 250 U/μL benzonase. The lysis mixture was centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 45 minutes to remove cell debris. The lysate was added directly to Nickel-NTA agarose beads (Gold Biotechnology) that was pre-equilibrated with the lysis buffer. The resin was washed with buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, and 20 mM imidazole. Prior to elution, the resin with the SUMO fusion was incubated with ULP1 (to cleave SUMO) and molar excess of fluorescein-5-maleimide (FAM) overnight at 4 °C. The eluent was taken and ran through a HiPrep desalting column in nanopure H2O, then dried overnight and resuspended in 50 mM Tris (pH 8) and 150 mM NaCl to concentrate. The S-TIMN-SL (SL = spin-label) was prepared in the same fashion, except the resin was mixed with (1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrroline-3-methyl) methanethiosulfonate) (MTSL) in molar excess, desalted into nanopure H2O, evaporated solvent overnight, and resuspended in D2O. To test for the presence of the SUMO fusion, the resin was washed with buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, and 300 mM imidazole for SDS-PAGE analysis.
The S-TIMN+3 peptide (KSVMDWLLATPQLYSAFSSLGC) that contains C-terminal residues from extension of the long-TIM isoform (in bold) was purchased at a purity of greater than 90% from the Biomatik Corporation. It was labeled with FM in 50 mM Tris (pH 8) and 150 mM NaCl in a 1:1.5 (peptide:FM) molar ratio overnight at 4 °C. The mixture was further purified on a Superdex 30 Size Exclusion Column (10/300 GL; GE Healthcare) in buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8) and 150 mM NaCl. The buffer was evaporated overnight to concentrate the peptide, then resuspended in the same buffer.
Fluorescence Polarization Assays
Fluorescence polarization assays were performed using the SpectraMax M5 Microplate Reader with Costar 3694 96-Well plates. All protein samples and peptides were diluted into buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8) and 150 mM NaCl at a final volume of 100 μL. The fluorescently labeled peptides were added prior to protein samples for a final concentration of 0.1 μM. For WT CRY samples in the light, a 100 μM stock was illuminated under low intensity blue light (GE LED+ Color; 8.5 W; 650 lumens) for 70 minutes before transfer to the 96-well plate. For CRYΔ and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala in the light, the protein was pre-incubated with the fluorescent S-TIMN peptide and illuminated for 10 minutes at high intensity (2.79 mW/cm2) in the OptoWell (OptoBioLabs) system prior to transfer to the 96-well plate. The polarization assays on the SpectraMax utilized the fluorescence polarization protocol, with a g-factor of 1.000, an excitation wavelength of 485 nm, and an emission wavelength of 525 nm with an emission wavelength cutoff at 515 nm. Three replicates per protein concentration were taken, averaged, and fitted in Matlab using the following equation, which assumes that the peptide concentration is much smaller than the KD values:
| (1) |
where is the experimentally determined average fluorescence polarization, is the affinity constant of the TIM peptides for CRY, is the protein concentration, accounts for the change in fluorescence polarization relative to 0, and is a constant. The error bars reflect the standard error in n=3 for each protein concentration. The above binding model28,29 assumes that the probe concentration (0.1 μM) is much less than the measured dissociation constants (15-30 μM) and that there is no appreciable nonspecific binding. Fitting to either a more generally representative quadratic equation or an exact solution incorporating non-specific binding produced the same dissociation constants within error30.
Sortylation of Arg237Ala and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala CRY Variants
The sortylation procedure was carried out as previously reported12,17. Briefly, a sortase recognition motif (Leu-Pro-Gly-Thr-Gly) was cloned onto the C-terminus of CRY at residue 539. The glycine-linked donor peptide was spin-labeled at the C-terminal Cys residue by MTSL (1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrroline-3-methyl) methanethiosulfonate) producing the labeled peptide Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Cys-SL, which was enzymatically added to the CRY C-terminal sortase motif with excision of one Gly residue. Hence, the spin label is disulfide linked to the C-terminal Cys residue at what would be position 548. All reaction mixtures were further purified on an analytical Superdex 200 Size Exclusion Column (10/300 GL, GE Healthcare) in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol (vol/vol). No reductants were added to the gel filtration buffer to avoid reduction of the SORTC-SL nitroxide radical or reduction of the disulfide bond between the spin probe and the peptide. Spin-labeled samples were buffer exchanged into deuterated buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 8, 150 mM NaCl) with 25% d8-glycerol utilizing a 50 kDa spin concentrator tube under ambient conditions.
Preparation of CRYΔ and S-TIMN-SL for Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) Experiments
For DEER experiments, CRYΔ samples were exchanged into deuterated buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 8, 150 mM NaCl) with 25% d8-glycerol in a 50 kDa spin concentrator tube. S-TIMN-SL (dissolved in D2O; 160 μM stock) was added to the deuterium exchanged CRYΔ in a 1:2 vol/vol ratio and concentrated slowly after the addition of the d8-glycerol.
ESR Spectroscopy Experiments (cwESR and 4-pulse DEER)
All ESR measurements were performed in a similar fashion to what has been previously reported12,17. Continuous-wave ESR (cwESR) experiments were performed atX-band (~9.4 GHz) at room temperature with a modulation amplitude of 2 G on a Bruker E500 spectrometer equipped with a super Hi-Q resonator. Samples were illuminated with a blue laser (TECBL-440, 30 mW, 440 nm) for 5-10 s in the resonator cavity. cwESR spectra were taken pre and post irradiation at X-band (~9.4 GHz) prior to DEER measurements. All DEER measurements were carried out at Q-band (~34 GHz) on a Bruker E580 spectrometer equipped with a 10 W solid-state amplifier (150 W equivalent TWTA), 150W RF amplifier, and an arbitrary waveform generator. DEER spectra were measured at 60 K in an EN 5107D2 Cavity with a cryogen-free insert/temperature controller. The measurements were performed using four pulses with 16-step phase cycling and a π/2 pulse length of 18 ns. The pump and probe pulses (flavin and nitroxide respectively) were separated by 84 MHz (~30 G). Raw data was background corrected with an exponential decay function.
DEER Spectroscopy Data Analysis
Data analysis for DEER was performed utilizing DD version 7B developed at Vanderbilt University (https://lab.vanderbilt.edu/hustedt-lab/dd/)31 and the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) method developed at Cornell University by ACERT (https://denoising.cornell.edu/)32. In DD, depending on the radical formed, the average distance and width for either one or two components were fixed while varying the population (in the two-component case) in order to find the best fit in accordance with the docked and undocked states established previously12,17. In addition to the percentage of docked and undocked components, noise corrected error values were calculated using the equation:
| (2) |
where and are the experimental and the fit data respectively, is a number of points, is a number of variables changed and is the estimated noise level for the point. Such values serve as an indication of the fit between the experimental data and the distance reconstruction; values below 2 indicate good fits. The SVD method was used to determine the distance distributions (P(r)) by obtaining an approximate solution to the Fredholm Equation , where is distance distribution, is the dipolar signal in the time domain and is the kernel representing the dipolar interaction between two spins. The SVD method obtains a solution, , by choosing only the large singular values that correspond to the signal. The flavin-nitroxide distance was estimated by calculating the distance of the flavin to the sulfhydryl group of Cys19 in the CRY:TIM structure and assuming that Cys19 bonded to MTSL was a worm-like chain with a persistence length of 1.4 Å (https://chemeslab.myqnapcloud.com:3939/CeffApp/)33.
UV-Vis Spectroscopy
UV-visible spectra of CRYΔ [in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol (vol/vol)] were taken in a quartz cuvette with a pathlength of 0.2 cm. The spectra were measured using an Agilent 8534 diode-array spectrophotometer with a single reference wavelength set to 800 nm for background correction. All samples were irradiated using a blue laser (TECBL-440, 30 mW, 440 nm, World Star Tech) for 10 seconds.
Small Angle X-Ray Scattering of CRYΔ
Samples of CRYΔ were prepared by cleaving the twin-strep-tag off with TEV protease in a 1:20 mg (TEV:CRYΔ) ratio prior to further purification on the Superdex 200 26/60 (GE Healthcare) size exclusion column, with the final concentration of the protein at 4 mg/mL [50 mM HEPES (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol (vol/vol), and 4 mM TCEP-HCl]. Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS) data were collected at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source beamline ID7A1. The accessible q range was from 0.005 - 0.7 Å−1, data were collected using an Eiger 4M Detector. Dark samples were covered with aluminum foil until time of collection, and light samples were illuminated at 440 nm (TECBL-440, 30 mW, World Star Tech) for 30 seconds prior to collection. The data were processed using RAW34.
MALDI-TOF of S-TIMN-NoM Peptide
The S-TIMN-NoM sample was first diluted to a concentration of 1 μM in its storage buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl]. A matrix solution containing saturated α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnaminic acid (HCCA; Sigma Aldrich) in TA30 solvent (30:70 [vol/vol] acetonitrile: 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water) was mixed 1:1 with the peptide solution. 0.5 μL of this mixture was then deposited onto a ground steel target and allowed to dry. The final concentration of the peptide on the target was 500 nM. The mass spectrum of S-TIMN-NoM was collected on a Bruker Autoflex Max MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometer.
RESULTS
TIM is a large protein with extensive stretches of disorder and many sites of posttranslational modification3,17-19. These features make it difficult to isolate TIM in quantity for in vitro interaction experiments. Thus, we sought to follow light-dependent binding of CRY to key TIM recognition elements that did not depend on purifying the entire TIM protein. We investigated the binding of CRY to TIM-derived peptides labeled with fluorescent probes and spin-reporters by fluorescence anisotropy and DEER measurements, respectively. To delineate steps in the light-sensing mechanism these assays were carried out with full-length CRY in dark and light, as well as with CRY variants, such as CRYΔ, which lacks the autoinhibitory CTT12,17.
Characterization of CRYΔ
CRYΔ binds TIM in both dark and light20-22. To quantify TIM binding to CRYΔ, CRYΔ was produced following a similar strategy as that used for full-length CRY12,17,21,26. The reduced ASQ state of CRYΔ was less stable than that of CRY, likely owing to the absence of the CTT. Higher flavin exposure increased ROS generation and promoted the formation of oxidative protein aggregates. However, twin-strep-tag addition and a higher concentration of reductant during purification mitigated aggregation and produced CRYΔ as a reasonably stable monomer, even after TEV protease cleavage of the twin-strep tag (Figure 2A).
Figure 2.
Characterization of CRYΔ. (A) Size exclusion chromatogram of recombinantly expressed CRYΔ after TEV cleavage. The main peak is denoted by a dashed black box and corresponds to fraction 19 of the SEC column as run on the SDS-PAGE gel (inset). The other gel lanes represent the fractions of the strep-affinity column (E), void (fraction 4) and CRYΔ prior to TEV cleavage of the twin-strep-tag (fraction 7). (B) UV/Vis spectra of CRYΔ in the dark (black) and after 10 seconds of irradiation with a 440 nm laser (blue). These spectra are virtually identical to that of WT CRY12. (C) X-band continuous wave electron spin resonance (cwESR) spectrum of CRYΔ post irradiation with blue light for 10 seconds. The peak-to-peak width is indicative of the ASQ state12. (D)/(E) Scattering profiles (log-log plot) (D) and dimensionless Kratky plots (E) of CRYΔ in dark (black) and post-illumination with blue light after 30 seconds (blue). Both scattering profiles are similar, and the dimensionless Kratky plots indicate globular, well-folded proteins in both states.
As has been shown previously35, CRYΔ has a similar flavin UV/Vis absorption spectrum as the full length protein. Also, like its full-length counterpart, CRYΔ binds oxidized FAD in the dark and is readily photoreduced in the light to the ASQ state, showing a characteristic UV/Vis peak at 403 nm (Figure 2B). To further validate the formation of the ASQ by CRYΔ, continuous wave electron spin resonance (cwESR) spectroscopy gave a flavin radical signal with a linewidth between 16 and 18 G that is characteristic of the ASQ12(Figure 2C). Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) reveals similar scattering profiles for CRYΔ in dark and light that are characteristic of monomeric, globular proteins (Figures 2D/E). Hence CRYΔ does not undergo large-scale conformational changes or oligomerization upon photoreduction.
CRY Binds to the N-terminal ARM Helix of TIM
The CRYΔ/TIM complex structure revealed the N-terminal 19-residue ARM helix of TIM to be at the center of the binding interface, effectively replacing the CTT in the dark-state full-length structure (Figure 1A). Given that this TIM helix replaced the CTT in the flavin binding pocket, we tested if a free peptide composed of this sequence would alone bind to CRY. A peptide corresponding to this helix, S-TIMN (MDWLLATPQLYSAFSSLGC), was recombinantly produced as a larger fusion protein, isolated and labeled with fluorescein-5-maleimide (FM) at the native cysteine residue for fluorescence polarization binding assays (Figures S1-S2). CRYΔ bound S-TIMN in both dark and light, but with somewhat higher affinity in the light (Figure 3A, Table 1). In contrast S-TIMN bound to full-length CRY (residues 1-539) only in light with an affinity similar to that seen for CRYΔ in light (Figure 3B). To further validate whether the binding modality of S-TIMN recapitulates that of TIM in the complex structure, S-TIMN was spin-labeled with MTSL ((1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrroline-3-methyl) methanethiosulfonate); S-TIMN-SL; Figure S1B) and 4-pulse double electron-electron resonance (4P-DEER) experiments were performed on the CRY-peptide complex, similar to those previously described12,17. CwESR gave a strong nitroxide-only signal in the dark whereas the ASQ and nitroxide signals overlapped in the light (Figure S3A-B). The time-domain dipolar data from 4P-DEER displayed a rapid decay with strong oscillations (Figure S3C), indicating that the ASQ and nitroxide are relatively close together in space. SVD-based analysis of the data (Figure S3D)31 yielded a distance maximum of 34.3 Å (Figure 3C). This distance is close to what is predicted from the CRY:TIM complex structure, provided that the peptide extends by the several flexible residues within the label (Figure 3C inset). These data affirm that binding of S-TIMN to CRY is indeed light-dependent, and that the CTT is important for regulating the interactions between the peptide and the binding pocket of CRY.
Figure 3.
S-TIMN alone binds to CRY. (A) Fluorescence polarization assays for S-TIMN binding to CRYΔ in dark (blue) and light (red). (B) Binding curves for S-TIMN to full-length CRY in dark (blue) and light (red). Each binding experiment was performed in triplicate; error bars are commensurate with the point sizes. (C) DEER-derived distance distribution of CRYΔ-S-TIMN-SL (below) compared to the structural model of the spin label relative to the flavin based on the cryo-EM structure of CRY:TIM. Binding constants are given in Table 1.
Table 1.
Binding affinities of peptides to CRY variants. *Uncertainty represents the 95% confidence interval across n=3 measurements all protein concentrations. ND – not determined.
| Variant | S-TIMN (KD in μM) |
S-TIMN-NoM (KD in μM) |
S-TIMN+3 (KD in μM) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRYΔ | Dark | 27 ± 2* | Dark | >103 | Dark | >103 | ||
| Light | 14 ± 2* | Light | >103 | Light | >103 | |||
| CRY | Dark | >103 | Dark | >103 | Dark | >103 | ||
| Full-Length | Light | 23 ± 6* | Light | >103 | Light | >103 | ||
| Arg237Ala | Dark | >103 | ND | ND | ||||
| Light | >103 | |||||||
| Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala | Dark | 20 ± 3 | ND | ND | ||||
| Light | 30 ± 20 | |||||||
Initiating Met of TIM is Important for Light-Dependent Recognition by CRY
Met1 of TIM engages in a network of hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions within the CRY binding pocket (Figure 1B). We sought to test the impact of Met1 on CRY recognition of TIM in two ways: 1) by deleting Met1 (S-TIMN-NoM; DWLLATPQLYSAFSSLGC-) and 2) by adding residues to the N-terminus of S-TIMN from the D. melanogater ls-tim allele, which is less light-sensitive and advantageous for flies living at high latitudes18,26,36 (S-TIMN+3; KSVMDWLLATPQLYSAFSSLGC-). These three residues (Lys-Ser-Val) from the 23-residue L-TIM extension are predicted to interact within the CRY:TIM interface, with the additional residues extending beyond the immediate pocket (Figure S4). S-TIMN peptides containing these modifications were either recombinantly expressed and purified or purchased, then fluorescently labeled with FM (Figures S5-S6). CRYΔ bound to neither of these peptides (Figure 4A). Similarly, neither the S-TIMN-NoM-FM nor the S-TIMN+3-FM peptides bound appreciably to full-length CRY in either dark or light (Figure 4B-C, Table 1).
Figure 4.
Interactions between modifed S-TIMN peptides and CRY variants. (A) Fluorescence polarization binding curves for the S-TIMN-NoM (cyan) and S-TIMN+3 (green) to CRYΔ. (B)/(C) Binding curves of the S-TIMN-NoM and S-TIMN+3 to full-length CRY in dark (blue) and light (red). (D)/(E) Binding curves of S-TIMNto Arg237Ala (D) and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala (E) in dark (blue) and light (red). All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Arg237, Asn253, and Gln254 are Critical Residues for CTT Release
Given that Arg237, Asn253 and Gln254 form new interactions with FAD in TIM-bound CRY (Figure 5A), we tested if Ala substitutions in these residues affected binding of S-TIMN and displacement of the CTT. Fluorescent anisotropy measurements of S-TIMN showed surprising behavior for both Arg237Ala and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala (Figure 4D/E). Arg237Ala displayed no detectable binding of S-TIMN in either dark or light (Table 1). In contrast, the Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala variant bound both in dark and light, with stronger binding and a larger fraction of binding in the dark. These results suggested that Arg237Ala and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala were modulating the conformation of the CTT and accessibility of the flavin pocket.
Figure 5.
Arg237, Asn253, and Gln254 influence CTT behavior in light. (A) Comparision of dark-state CRY structure (4GU5; grey and CRY CTT in red with Mg ion shown as a green sphere) and TIM-bound CRY structure (8DD7; “light”; gold and light blue for N-terminal helix of TIM). Note the structural rearrangement of R237 (cyan), N253 and Q254 on the phosphate-binding loop (tan) in the TIM-bound light state. B) Distance distributions for CTT spin-labeled samples after illumination (Leu405Glu/Cys416Asn [dark state mimic] and WT12,17; leftmost), Arg237Ala (middle-left; % undocked = 2.2 ± 0.6; ), and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala (middle-right; % undocked = 29.6 ± 0.8; ), and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala/Leu405Glu/Cys416Asn (rightmost; % undocked = 23.2 ± 0.005; ) with docked populations colored in light blue and undocked colored in light pink.
The sortase-mediated spin-labeling method that places a nitroxide spin label at an engineered C-terminal Cys residue (Cys 548)12,17 was utilized to quantify the level of CTT undocking in the Arg237Ala and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala variants. DEER spectroscopy and subsequent fitting of the proportions of docked (29.3 ± 2.0 Å) and undocked (39.5 ± 6.7 Å) CTT conformations12 with the DEER analysis program DD32 yielded the degree of CTT release in each case (Figure 5B leftmost). As an alternative analysis approach, singular-value decomposition (SVD)-based fitting improved the fits to the time-domain data sets and also gave similar distance maxima (Figures S7-S8). Qualitatively, the long-distance components obtained by SVD resemble the distributions of undocked states obtained by DD32 (Figure S8). DEER data was also measured for CRY with the Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala substitutions in the context of the Leu405Glu/Cys416Asn (EN) variant, which forms a neutral semiquinone, does not release the CTT and hence serves as a dark-state proxy that contains a reference spin on the flavin12. These analyses indicated that, unlike with WT, the Arg237Ala CTT remained almost entirely docked in the photoreduced state (Figure 5B). Similarly, the CTT of the Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala variant remained mostly docked in the photoreduced state (~70%, Figure 5B), a proportion that did not change greatly (~77%) in the dark state EN proxy of this variant (Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala/Leu405Glu/Cys416Asn). Thus, Arg237Ala prevents CTT release in the light and as a result S-TIMN does not bind to CRY in either dark or light. In contrast, S-TIMN binds Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala in both dark and light, despite the CTT having a primarily docked conformation in each that also does not respond to light. To investigate Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala further, the interaction between the spin-labeled S-TIMN peptide and the Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala light state and dark-state proxy was measured by DEER and found to be considerably different than that observed for WT CRYΔ (Figure S9). Thus, the Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala substitutions have altered CRY in a manner that allows for some degree of non-native binding of the TIM peptide and loss of proper gating by flavin photoreduction. The weaker interaction implied by the partially undocked CTT of this variant in the dark state (Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala/Leu405Glu/Cys416Asn, Figure 5B) may also allow S-TIMN to partially compete with the CTT of Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala for the flavin pocket in the unactivated protein.
DISCUSSION
Light-dependent formation of the CRY:TIM complex entrains the Drosophila TTFL to light. Although the interaction between CRY and TIM is extensive (over 2300 Å2 of buried surface area on TIM) and involves many structural elements of both proteins, the principal contact involves the 16-residue N-terminal helix of TIM, which accounts for 970 Å2 of buried surface area in the interface23. The TIM N-terminus inserts directly into the FAD binding pocket, replacing the CRY CTT (Figure 5, Figure 5A)23. TIM has only been produced within insect cells, usually in co-expression with CRYΔ and at low levels. Thus, the finding that the S-TIMN peptide alone binds CRY in a light-dependent manner is both useful and convenient for studying the light-regulation of this critical binding interaction. S-TIMN bound to CRYΔ with reasonably high affinity in the dark and even tighter affinity in the light (Figure 3A-B, Table 1). These data are consistent with CRYΔ constitutively interacting with TIM in cells17,21. 4P-DEER spectroscopy with CRYΔ and spin-labeled S-TIMN produced a distance of ~34 Å between the spin-label and the flavin, which is close to that predicted by the structure of the CRY:TIM complex (Figure 3B). It follows that the position of the peptide in the binding pocket is likely similar to the N-terminus of full-length TIM. Although it was expected for CRYΔ to bind S-TIMN in both dark and light because there is no CTT to block the flavin pocket in CRYΔ, the higher affinity in light indicates that conformational changes within CRY, independent of CTT displacement, also contribute to light-state affinity. The CRY:TIM structure reveals several regions of CRY that change conformation relative to the dark state that include the PBL, but also the C-terminal lid, protrusion motif and flavin interacting residues in addition to Arg23723; FAD photoreduction may indeed promote such restructuring of the flavin pocket to increase affinity for S-TIMN, even in the absence of the CTT. Nonetheless, S-TIMN does not greatly differentiate the light vs. dark state of CRYΔ, and hence the change in affinity of the CTT for the flavin pocket in light is likely the primary driver of target discrimination.
Removal of, or additions to, the N-terminal residue of the S-TIMN peptide dramatically affect affinity for CRY. Within the center of the CRY:TIM contact, the Met1 residue of TIM participates in extensive interactions that include backbone hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic sidechain packing against the CRY PBL (Figure 1B)23. In Drosophila, initiating Met residues are often post-translationally modified by removal, N-terminal acetylation24,37,38 or oxidation39. Furthermore, the ls-tim allele, which correlates with adaptation to high-latitudes, encodes for a L-TIM isoform that adds 23 residues to the N-terminus and is less light sensitive than S-TIM due to weaker interactions with CRY17,23,24. Given these considerations, we applied the S-TIMN binding assay to test the importance of the Met1 to CRY recognition. Met removal to generate the S-TIMN-NoM peptide abrogates binding to either CRY or CRYΔ. Thus, it seems unlikely that the TIM N-terminal Met could be proteolytically processed without affecting the interaction with CRY. Furthermore, additions to the TIM N-terminus also reduce affinity, S-TIMN+3 also shows no appreciable binding to either CRY or CRYΔ. Although the full L-TIM addition is longer than that studied here, even adding three N-terminal residues from this isoform greatly curtails peptide binding to CRY or CRYΔ. These three residues are constrained to lie within the interface, but additional residues from L-TIM would extend the N-terminus enough for it to project free of the pocket formed with CRY (Figure S4). Although the complete L-TIM modification may interact elsewhere on the surface of the complex, the ability of full-length L-TIM to still bind CRY, albeit with weakened affinity compared to S-TIM18,26,36, more likely reflects contributions from the binding elements provided by the entire TIM protein that do not involve the N-terminus.
The CRY:TIM structure indicates that binding of TIM involves a conformational change within the FAD itself, hydrogen bonding alterations between the cofactor and protein and a large structural rearrangement of the PBL (Figure 1, Figure 5A)23. Particularly Arg237, Asn253, and Gln254 undergo the most drastic rearrangements relative to the dark-state structure of CRY alone (Figure 5A). Arg237 forms new hydrogen bonds with the FAD phosphate groups, replacing Mg2+, whereas the helical portion of the phosphate binding loop (where Asn253 and Gln254 reside) translates and rotates inward with the sidechains pointing toward where the CTT would be in the dark state (Figure 5A).
It is reasonable to assume that Arg237, Asn253 and Gln254 change conformation in concert with TIM binding because these residues do not contact the flavin nor the CTT in dark-state CRY. However, the Arg237Ala variant cannot release the CTT in the light, which rather suggests that the replacement of the Mg2+ counter ion with Arg237 along with the coordinated movement of α8 propagates changes from the flavin redox state to CTT undocking. Ala substitutions at N253/Q254 also destabilize the CTT against the flavin pocket in the dark state, despite those residues not directly contacting the CTT. Like Arg237Ala, the Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala variant shows little increase in the proportion of the undocked conformation with light; and like Arg237Ala, this lack of photoresponsiveness indicates that the PBL conformational change derives from flavin photoreduction and perhaps the altered conformation of the diphosphate moiety. Moreover, PBL rearrangement likely encourages CTT displacement because the TIM-bound, light-state conformation of the PBL overlaps with Trp536 of the CTT in the dark state (Figure 6A). The altered PBL conformation is further stabilized by His377 and His378, two residues also involved in CTT displacement and TIM binding17,40. Thus, the PBL, α8 and Arg237 respond to structural perturbations in FAD, which likely accompany ASQ formation and the new PBL conformation then competes with the CTT for the flavin pocket. The ability of S-TIMN to bind to both the dark and light states of Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala CRY, but with a conformation that differs from that of WT indicates that these substitutions have perturbed the protein sufficiently to decouple the light response, yet still allow a binding interaction that likely resembles the native interaction. S-TIMN may also compete more effectively with the CTT in the variant than in the WT. Thus, the CTT in Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala may be both more weakly bound in the dark state and decoupled from the photoactivation of the FAD cofactor.
Figure 6.
Structure and conservation of residues involved in CRY light activation. (A) Superposition of dark-state CRY (4GU5, grey ribbons) and light-state CRY bound to TIM (8DD7, golden ribbons) showing the movement of Arg237, α8 and PBL residues Asn253,Gln254 (yellow bonds and black arrows). The PBL in the light-state overlaps with the CTT residue Trp536 (red ribbons and bonds). (B) Sequence alignment of Type-1 invertebrate CRYs showing the conservation of Arg237, Asn253 and Gln254 (black boxes). Sequences represent arthropod, mollusc, brachiopod, and echinoderm CRY sequences, with Drosophila CRY boxed in red. Protein sequence accession numbers: NP_001182628- Bombyx mori CRY1; XP_040162237- Anopheles arabiensis CRY1; XP_037923127 – Hermetia illucens CRY1; NP_732407 – Drosophila melanogaster CRY; XP_004529290 – Ceratitis capitata CRY1; XP_050318184 – Bactrocera neohumeralis CRY1; BAI67363 – Zeugodacus cucurbitae CRY; XP_053955954 – Anastrepha ludens CRY1; XP_017479296 – Rhagoletis zephyria CRY1 ; XP_037947512 – Teleopsis dalmanni CRY1; XP_058985859 – Musca domestica CRY1; XP_037810294 – Lucilia sericata CRY1; TMW52653 – Sarcophaga bullata CRY; XP_053397012 – Mercenaria mercenaria CRY1; XP_013384752 – Lingula anatina CRY1; CAI9721929 – Octopus vulgaris CRY- XP_038072864 – Patiria miniata CRY1.
The CRY regions revealed to be critical for light activation are well conserved in Type-I light sensitive cryptochromes of Protostomia (arthropods, mollusks, annelids, brachiopods) and echinoderms, but not chordates, bacteria, archaea or plants (Figures 6B and 7). Indeed, CRY2 of Arabidopsis thaliana, which has been structurally characterized in a light-activated tetrameric state41,42, has little sequence similarity with Drosophila CRY in the PBL and also does not conserve Arg237. As such, the corresponding regions of CRY2 interact differently with FAD compared to Drosophila CRY (Figure 7). For example, in plant CRY2 the residue analogous to Arg237, Phe224, does not interact with FAD, instead Ser245 hydrogen bonds to the diphosphate group (Figure 7A). In Drosophia CRY, the region that harbors Ser245 and couples to the PBL has a very different sequence and conformation than in plant CRY (Figure 7B). Drosophia CRY also does not form high order homooligomers upon light activation, as does CRY2, and hence the overall conformational response to the change in cofactor state differs considerably in the two families of proteins.
Figure 7.
Role of the phosphate binding loop in light activation by invertebrate and plant CRYs. (A) Superposition of light-state CRY bound to TIM (8DD7, golden ribbons) and light-state Arabidopsis CRY2 (PDB code: 6M79)37 showing the differing conformation and interaction of the phosphate binding loop. CRY Arg237 is replaced by a Phe residue that does not interact with the FAD diphosphate group; instead CRY2 Ser245 takes on this role. (B) Sequence alignment of a representative group of invertebrate, chordate and plant cryptochromes and photolyases showing that Arg237, Asn253 and Gln254 are not conserved and that their surrounding sequence regions have considerable variability. Drosophila CRY sequence is boxed in red, residues equivalent to CRY Arg237, Asn253 and Gln254 are boxed in black. Protein sequence accession numbers: AAC08008 – Arabidopsis thaliana CPD PL; NP_568461.3 – Arabidopsis thaliana CRY3; WP_071197283 – Vibrio cholerae CRY-DASH; NP_732407 – Drosophila melanogaster CRY; AAX58599 – Danaus plexippus CRY; XP_042923874 – Chlamydomonas reinhardtii CRY; BAA24449 – Arabidopsis thaliana 6-4 PL; NP_001260633 – Drosophila melanogaster 6-4 PL; AYE53930 – Columba livia CRY4; ABA62409 – Danaus plexippus CRY2; EDL21416- Mus musculus CRY1; EDL27606 – Mus musculus CRY2; WP_062883603- Escherichia coli PL; NP_567341 – Arabidopsis thaliana CRY1; NP_849588 – Arabidopsis thaliana CRY2; KRO89520 – Rhodobacter sp. PL; SEQ40124 – Agrobacterium fabrum PL. CPD PL – cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase, 6-4 PL- 6-4 photolyase, CRY-DASH – Drosophila, Arabidopsis, Synechocystis, human (DASH)-type cryptochromes.
CONCLUSION
In summary, CRY exhibits light dependent binding to a peptide composed of the N-terminal TIM sequence. The S-TIMN peptide does bind CRYΔ more strongly in light than dark, but the change in affinity is much less than the differential binding in light and dark demonstrated by full-length CRY. Thus, CTT undocking in response to flavin photoreduction in the light is the primary mechanism of gating interactions with TIM. Removal of the N-terminal Met or the addition of N-terminal residues abolishes binding of the S-TIMN peptide, the latter providing a detailed biochemical rationale for how the LS-TIM isoform modulates light sensitivity in flies by weakening the affinity of the N-terminal binding element. CRY variants with residue substitutions in α8 and the PBL fail to fully undock the CTT in light and do not properly bind and discriminate the S-TIMN peptide. The involvement of flavin-dependent PBL rearrangements in CTT undocking is explained by steric clash between the PBL in the CRY light state and the CTT in the dark state. Although the dissociation constant between CRY and S-TIMN is only in the ~10 μM range, which is considerably weaker than that estimated for full-length TIM17 (< 1 μM), it provides a starting point to consider using the N-terminal peptide of TIM as a tag for engineering optogenetic tools43-45 that allow control of protein interactions with light41,42. Indeed, CRY2 of Arabidopsis thaliana has been used with its partner CIB1 to recruit heterologous proteins together with light46,47. In conclusion, our results here characterize important steps in CRY photoactivation and further provide a rationale to develop CRY and S-TIMN as transferable recognition elements for the control of protein-protein interactions.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was financially supported by NIH grant R35GM122535 (B.R.C.), NSF grant MCB-1715233 (B.R.C.). ESR measurements were carried out at ACERT which is supported by NIH/NIGMS awards P41 GM103521 and 1S1 0OD021543.
We wish to thank Siddarth Chandrasekaran for initial cloning of S-TIMN into pet28a(+), Mike Lynch for assistance with MALDI, and the Cornell Biotechnology Resource Center (Ruchika Bhawal, Elizabeth Anderson, Qin Fu, and Sheng Zhang) for assistance with the mass spectrometry data collection and processing.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supporting Information
The supporting information is available free of charge at (insert link from journal).
Purification and labeling of S-TIMN; Mass spectrometry characterization of the S-TMN peptide; CRYΔ+S-TIMN-SL ESR data; Purification and labeling of S-TIMN-NoM; Purification and labeling of S-TIMN+3; ESR data for Arg237Ala, Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala, and Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala/Leu405Glu/Cys416Asn variants; Distributions of CTT-SL to flavin radical distances derived by SVD for CRY variants. S-TIMN-SL peptide interactions with Asn253Ala/Gln254Ala variants.
Accession IDs of Proteins from UniProt
Drosophila melanogaster Cryptochrome: O77059
Drosophila melanogaster Timeless: P49021
References
- 1.Yakir E, Hilman D, Harir Y and Green RM (2006). Regulation of output from the plant circadian clock. FEBS Journal 274, 335–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Takahashi JS (2017). Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature Review Genetics 18, 164–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Crane BR, and Young MW (2014). Interactive features of proteins composing eukaryotic circadian clocks. Annual Reviews in Biochemistry 83, 191–219. 10.1146/annurevbiochem-060713-035644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harmer SL, Panda S and Kay SA (2001). Molecular bases of circadian rhythms. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 17, 215–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Crosthwaite SK, Dunlap JC and Loros JJ (1997). Neurospora wc-1 and wc-2 transcription, photoresponses, and the origions of circadian rhythmicity. Science 276, 763–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Best JD, Maywood ES, Smith KL and Hastings MH (1999). Rapid resetting of the mammalian circadian clock. Journal of Neuroscience 19, 828–835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pittendrigh CS (1993). Temporal organization: reflections of a Darwinian clock-watcher. Annual Reviews in Physiology 55, 17–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stanewsky R. (2003). Genetic Analysis of the Circadian System in Drosophila melanogaster and Mammals. Journal of Neurobiology 54, 111–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ozturk N. (2017). Phylogenetic and Functional Classification of the Photolyase/Cryptochrome Family. Photochemistry and Photobiology 93, 104–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zoltowski BD, Vaidya AT, Top D, Widom J, Young MW and Crane BR (2011). Structure of full-length Drosophila cryptochrome. Nature 480, 396–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Levy C, Zoltowski BD, Jones AR, Yaidya AT, Top D, Widom J, Young MW, Scrutton NS, Crane BR and Leys D (2013). Updated structure of Drosophila cryptochrome. Nature 495, E3–E4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chandrasekaran S, Schneps CM, Dunleavy R, Lin C, DeOliveira CC, Ganguly A and Crane BR (2021). Tuning flavin environment to detect and control conformational switching in Drosophila Cryptochrome. Communications Biology 4, 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chaves I, Pokorny R, Byrdin M, Hoang N, Ritz T, Brettel K, Essen L-O, van der Horst GTJ, Batschauer A and Ahmad M (2011) The cryptochromes: blue light photoreceptors in plants and animals. Annual Reviews in Plant Biology 62, 335–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Öztürk N Hong S-H, Özgür S, Selby CO, Morrison L, Partch C, Zhong D and Sancar A (2007). Structure and function of animal cryptochromes. Cold Spring Harb. Symposia Quant. Biol 72, 119–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Emery P, So WV, Kaneko M, Hall JC and Rosbash M (1998). Cry, a Drosophila clock and light-regulated cryptochrome, is a major contributor to circadian rhythm resetting and photosensitivity. Cell 95, 669–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Emery P, Stanewsky R, Hall JC and Rosbash M (2000). A unique circadian-rhythm photoreceptor. Nature 404, 456–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin C, Schneps CM, Chandrasekaran S, Ganguly A and Crane BR (2022). Mechanistic insight into light-dependent recognition of Timeless by Drosophila Cryptochrome. Structure. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2022.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Peschel N, Chen KF, Szabo G and Stanewsky R (2009). Light-dependent interactions between the Drosophila circadian clock factors cryptochrome, jetlag, and timeless. Current Biology 19, 241–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Koh K, Zheng XZ and Sehgal A (2006). JETLAG resets the Drosophila circadian clock by promoting light-induced degradation of TIMELESS. Science 312, 1809–1812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dissel S, Codd V, Fedic R, Garner KJ, Costa R, Kyriacou CP and Rosato E (2004). A constitutively active cryptochrome in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Neuroscience 7, 834–840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hemsley MJ, Mazzotta GM, Mason M, Dissel S, Toppo S, Pagano MA, Sandrelli F, Meggio F, Rosato E, Costa R and Tasatto SCE (2007). Linear motifs in the C-terminus of D. melanogaster cryptochrome. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 355, 531–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Busza A, Emery-Le M, Rosbash M and Emery P (2004). Roles of the Two Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Structural Domains in Circadian Photoreception. Science 304, 1503–1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lin C, Feng S, DeOliveira CC and Crane BR (2023) Cryptochrome-Timeless structure reveals circadian clock timing mechanisms. Nature 617(7959), 194–199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goetze S, Qeli E, Mosimann C, Staes A, Gerrits B, Roschitzki B, Mohanty S, Niederer EM, Laczko E, Timmerman E, Lange V, Hafen E, Aebersold R, Vandekerckhove J, Basler K, Ahrens CH, Gevaert K and Brunner E (2009). Identification and Functional Characterization of N-Terminally Acetylated Proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biology 7(11), e1000236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tauber E, Zordan M, Sandrelli F, Pegoraro M, Breda C, Daga A, Selmin A, Monger K, Benna C, Rosato E, Kyriacou CP and Costa R (2007). Natural selection favors a newly derived timeless allele in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 316(5833), 1895–1898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Deppisch P, Prutscher JM, Pegoraro M, Tauber E, Wegener C and Helfrich-Förster C (2022). Adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster to Long Photoperiods of High-Latitude Summers is Facilitated by the ls-Timeless Allele. Journal of Biological Rhythms 37(2), 185–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mathes T, Vogl C, Stolz J & Hegemann P (2009). In vivo generation of flavoproteins with modified cofactors. Journal of Molecular Biology 385, 1511–1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rossi AM & Taylor CW (2011). Analysis of protein-ligand interactions by fluorescence polarization. Nature Methods 6, 365–387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moerke NJ (2009). Fluorescence Polarization (FP) Assays for Monitoring Peptide-Protein or Nucleic Acid-Protein Binding. Current Protocols in Chemical Biology 1, 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roehrl MHA, Wang JY and Wagner G (2004). A General Framework for Development and Data Analysis of Competitive High-Throughput Screens for Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions by Fluorescence Polarization. Biochemistry 43(51), 16056–16066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Srivastava M and Freed JH (2017). Singular Value Decomposition Method to Determine Distance Distributions in Pulsed Dipolar Electron Spin Resonance. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 5648–5655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stein RA, Beth AH & Hustedt EJ (2015). A straightforward approach to the analysis of double electron-electron resonance data. Methods in Enzymology 563, 531–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kjaergaard M, Glavina J, Chemes LB (2021) Predicting the effect of disordered linkers on effective concentrations and avidity with the “Ceff calculator” app. Methods in Enzymology 647, 145–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hopkins JB, Gillilan RE and Soren S (2017). BioXTAS RAW: improvements to a free open-source program for small-angle X-ray scattering data reduction and analysis. Journal of Applied Crystallography 50, 1543–1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ozturk N, Selby CP, Annayev Y, Zhong D and Sancar A (2010). Reaction mechanism of Drosophila cryptochrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108(2), 516–521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sandrelli F, Tauber E, Pegoraro M, Mazzotta G, Cisotto P, Landskron J, Stanewsky R, Piccin A, Rosato E, Zordan M, Costa R and Kyriacou CP (2007). A molecular basis for natural selection at the timeless locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 316(5833), 1898–1900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bonet-Costa C, Vilaseca M, Diema C, Vujatovic O, Vaquero A, Omeñaca N, Castejón L, Bernués, Gurealt E and Azorin F (2012). Combined bottom-up and top-down mass spectrometry analyses of the pattern of post-translational modifications of Drosophila melanogaster linker histone H. Journal of Proteomics 75, 4124–4138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Polevoda B and Sherman M (2003). N-terminal acetyltransferases and sequence requirements for N-terminal acetylation of eukaryotic proteins. Jounral of Molecular Biology 325, 595–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lim D-H, Han JY, Kim J-R, Lee YS and Kim H-Y. (2012). Methionine sulfoxide reductase B in the endoplasmic reticulum is critical for stress resistance and aging in Drosophila. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 419, 20–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Palayam M, Ganapathy J, Guercio AM, Tal L, Deck SL and Shabek N (2021). Structural insights into photoactivation of plant Cryptochrome-2. Communications Biology 4(28), doi.org/ 10.1038/s42003-020-01531-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ma L, Guan Z, Wang Q, Yan X, Wang J, Wang Z, Cao J, Zhang D, Gong X and Yin P (2020). Structural insights into the photoactivation of Arabidopsis CRY2. Nature Plants 6, 1432–1438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kolarski D, Miller S, Oshima T, Nagai Y, Aoki Y, Kobauri P, Srivastava A, Sugiyama A, Amaike A, Sato A, Tama F, Szymanski W, Feringa BL, Itami K and Hiorta T (2021) Photopharmacological Manipulation of Mammalian CRY1 for Regulation of the Circadian Clock. Journal of the American Chemical Society 143, 2078–2087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kolarski D, Miró-Vinyals C, Sugiyama A, Sirvastava A, Ono D, Nagai Y, Iida M, Itami K, Tama F, Szymanski W, Hirota T and Feringa BL (2021). Reversible modulation of circadian time with chronophotopharmacology. Nature Communications 12. doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-021-23301-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kolarski D, Sugiyama A, Breton G, Rakers C, Ono D, Schulte A, Tama F, Itami K, Szymanski W, Hirota T and Feringa BL (2019). Controlling the Circadian Clock with High Temporal Resolution through Photodosing. Journal of the American Chemical Society 141, 15784–15791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Taslimi A, Vrana JD, Chen D, Borinskaya S, Mayer BJ, Kennedy MJ and Tucker CL (2014). An optimized optogenetic clustering tool for probing protein interaction and function. Nature Communications 5. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pathak GP, Spiltoir JI, Höglund C, Polstein LR, Heine-Koskinen S, Gersbach CA, Rossi J and Tucker CL (2017). Bidirectional approaches for optogenetic regulation of gene expression in mammalian cells using Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2. Nucleic Acids Research 45(20), doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gkx260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kennedy MJ, Hughes RM, Peteya LA, Schwartz JW, Ehlers MD & Tucker CL (2010). Rapid blue-light-mediated induction of protein interactions in living cells. Nature Methods 7, doi.org/ 10.1038/nmeth.1524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







