Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1997 Oct;54(10):714–719. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.10.714

Efficiency of different grouping schemes for dust exposure in the European carbon black respiratory morbidity study.

M van Tongeren 1, K Gardiner 1, I Calvert 1, H Kromhout 1, J M Harrington 1
PMCID: PMC1128925  PMID: 9404318

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the theoretical efficiencies of different grouping strategies and its effect on the exposure-response relation in a study of respiratory morbidity associated with exposure to total inhalable and respirable carbon black dust. METHODS: A large epidemiological study is being undertaken to investigate the respiratory health of employees in the European carbon black manufacturing industry in relation to exposure to carbon black dust. In phase 2 of the study, repeated measurements of total inhalable and respirable dust were taken which enabled estimation of various components of variability in the exposure data (within and between worker variance and within and between group variance). These variance components were used to calculate the contrast in exposure between the groups in various classification schemes and to calculate the theoretical attenuation of the exposure-response relation and the standard error (SE) of the slope. RESULTS: High contrast in exposure was found when workers were classified according to the combination of their factory and job category as well as when these combinations were amalgamated into five exposure groups. Attenuation was minimal with most grouping schemes; only with the individual based strategy was the attenuation large. The SE of the theoretically attenuated exposure-response slope was smallest for the strategy based on individual people followed by the classification scheme based on factory and job category. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that, although some assumptions for the calculations of the attenuation of the exposure-response slope were not met, the most appropriate classification scheme of the worker seems to be by the combination of factory and job category.

Full text

PDF
714

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gardiner K., Calvert I. A., van Tongeren M. J., Harrington J. M. Occupational exposure to carbon black in its manufacture: data from 1987 to 1992. Ann Occup Hyg. 1996 Feb;40(1):65–77. doi: 10.1016/0003-4878(95)00059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gardiner K. Needs of occupational exposure sampling strategies for compliance and epidemiology. Occup Environ Med. 1995 Nov;52(11):705–708. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.11.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardiner K., Trethowan N. W., Harrington J. M., Rossiter C. E., Calvert I. A. Respiratory health effects of carbon black: a survey of European carbon black workers. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Dec;50(12):1082–1096. doi: 10.1136/oem.50.12.1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardiner K., Trethowan W. N., Harrington J. M., Calvert I. A., Glass D. C. Occupational exposure to carbon black in its manufacture. Ann Occup Hyg. 1992 Oct;36(5):477–496. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/36.5.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kromhout H., Heederik D. Occupational epidemiology in the rubber industry: implications of exposure variability. Am J Ind Med. 1995 Feb;27(2):171–185. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kromhout H., Symanski E., Rappaport S. M. A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. Ann Occup Hyg. 1993 Jun;37(3):253–270. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/37.3.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mark D., Vincent J. H. A new personal sampler for airborne total dust in workplaces. Ann Occup Hyg. 1986;30(1):89–102. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/30.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rappaport S. M. Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. Ann Occup Hyg. 1991 Feb;35(1):61–121. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/35.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES