Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Jul 30;14:17564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67994-8

Influence of calcination temperature and particle size distribution on the physical properties of SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19 hexaferrite powders

Jakub Hlosta 1,, Kamila Hrabovská 2, Jiří Rozbroj 1, Jan Nečas 1, David Žurovec 1, Jan Diviš 1, Ondřej Životský 2
PMCID: PMC11289406  PMID: 39080426

Abstract

The paper deals with the economic optimisation of ferrite powder preparation during producing hard ferrite magnets. The magnetic properties of ferrites are investigated by replacing feedstock and reducing calcination temperature and particles in the order of tens of microns. The granulates about 8–10 mm in size were calcined for 2 h in the temperature range from 1100 °C to 1300 °C and additionally crushed and milled to an average particle size of about 80–90 µm. The scanning electron microscopy images confirmed the agglomerates of particles with different shapes and sizes in tens of µm. The X-ray diffraction measurements revealed that, besides the SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19 phases, there was also the presence of 2–39% hematite. The highest values of maximum energy product (BH)max = 930 J/m3 and remanent magnetic induction Br = 72.8 mT were obtained at a calcination temperature of 1300 °C. The Henkel plots confirmed the presence of exchange-coupling and dipolar magnetic interactions at lower and higher magnetic fields, respectively. The strength of interactions was also dependent on the calcination temperature. Replacing strontium with barium led to a deterioration of the magnetic parameters, which were optimal at a lower calcination temperature (1100 °C). This phenomenon was partly overcome by reducing the mean particle size of Ba-based hexaferrites to 45–50 µm.

Keywords: M-type ferrites, BaFe12O19, SrFe12O19, Microstructure, Magnetic interactions, Hysteresis loops

Subject terms: Chemical engineering, Ferromagnetism, Magnetic properties and materials

Introduction

Magnets have many uses in various fields, and their worldwide consumption is increasing. Permanent magnets find applications in the automotive, electrical and energy industries, medical devices, and others19. The most used permanent magnets are hard ferrite magnets10. It is because they are the most affordable. In addition to the wide-spread barium ferrites, highly coercive strontium ferrites are increasingly used. Barium and strontium hexaferrite magnets belong to permanent magnets with hexagonal structures11, which have desirable ferromagnetic properties. These hard hexaferrite magnets with the chemical formula BaFe12O19 and SrFe12O19, respectively, have good chemical stability, high Curie temperature and good corrosion resistance, and therefore, surface coating is not necessary before application12. Another advantage is the relatively lower cost than other permanent magnets, such as rare earth magnets, AlNiCo or SmCo. Hard hexaferrite magnets are currently being investigated as potential magnetic materials without rare-earth elements (RE) in medium energy product applications due to the need for new and cheaper magnetic materials with reduced or even no RE because of the significant criticism of RE13.

Because of the unique combination of BaFe12O19 magnetic properties, chemical and thermal stability along with suitable applications in modern technologies, several of their physical properties, such as magnetoelectric14, multiferroic15 and microwave absorption16, have been studied. The low cost of BaM, good availability and relatively easy processing are also advantages. Nanoscale hexagonal ferrites are also promising materials for the fabrication of a new generation of permanent magnets, as well as high-density data recording and storage systems17. The mechanical and physical properties of powdered materials have an overall impact on their handling and processing behaviour18,19.

Generally, the properties of ferrites depend strongly on their composition, synthesis conditions, crystallinity, shape, particle size and distribution2023. The calcination temperature of the reaction usually ranges between 1250 and 1400 °C24. Another study dealing with calcination temperature’s effect found that 1100 °C is a suitable temperature24. Their SEM photographs showed grains in the shape of regular hexagonal plates. In addition, maximum saturation magnetization was obtained at 1200 °C. However, the coercivity of the synthesized BaFe12O19 samples was lower than the theoretical values24. Another study shows a broader temperature range from 800 °C to 1100 °C. The effect on particle morphology, particle size, magnetic hysteresis and optical properties was studied25. The impact of not only temperature but also the calcination time of the powders was found. Extending the calcination time to 24 h led to the forming a fully crystalline BaM phase at 1100 °C. Extending the calcination time to 124 h led to thermal decomposition and formation of BaO as the second phase. The magnetic domain structure transformed from single to multi-domain with increasing temperature from 1100 °C to 1300 °C10.

The formation of hexagonal ferrites is a highly complicated process, and the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. However, they have been of interest for many researchers worldwide for over 50 years2630. Therefore, in this study, the effect of calcination temperature and particle size distribution of ground calcite on the magnetic properties of M-type ferrite powders was investigated. The quality of input raw materials mainly influences the calcination process, the molar ratio (SrO:Fe2O3) ~ 5.85, the size of the granulate, the temperature profile of the calcination furnace, the furnace flow rate and the processes taking place in the cooling retort of the furnace.

The whole research was carried out in cooperation and according to the requirements of the manufacturer of hard ferrite magnets. The study shows the development and optimization of the technology of mixing basic raw materials and grinding of ferrite calcite, determination of the influence of granulometric and frictional parameters of feedstock and setting of preparation technology of ferrite dust as a feedstock for the production of hard ferrite magnets. The aim was to ensure constant and quantifiable outputs from the different parts of the process line, which would improve the final product’s magnetic properties. The findings obtained in a partial study of the effect of calcination temperature and particle size distribution on the magnetic properties of SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19 ferrite powders are presented.

Many publications have focused on improving ferrites’ magnetic, chemical and mechanical properties by increasing calcination temperatures or using finer particles down to the nanometer range. This entails a significant increase in the technological and economic requirements of the process. The main contribution of this study should be to provide an overview of an economically suitable setup usable for routine and sustainable mass production as well as small-scale production. There are a multitude of synthesis methods and technological setups. Thus, each study is unique and has its significance. Therefore, even today, publications are still being published on this topic.

Materials and methods

Input powders characterization

Iron oxide (Fe2O3), strontium carbonate (SrCO3), and barium carbonate (BaCO3) were used as input powders for the preparation of hexagonal ferrites. The basic mechanical and physical properties of input powders are shown in Table 1, and the chemical compositions available from the manufacturers are presented in Table 2. Freeman FT4 Powder Rheometer was used to determine the flow properties and compressibility. The flow properties are significant due to the homogenization of both compounds and the compression process used to produce hard ferrite magnets. The particle size distribution was determined by laser diffraction using a CILAS 1190 Particle Size Analyzer (wet method).

Table 1.

Mechanical and physical parameters of the compounds used.

Parameter Symbol Unit Fe2O3 SrCO3 BaCO3 Sr_MIX Ba_MIX
Angle of internal friction φ (°) 35.6 39.2 40.4 34.7 35.1
Angle of internal friction (ef.) φe (°) 47.8 56.7 49.9 42.9 44.3
Cohesion τ0 (kPa) 3.08 4.93 3.11 2.15 2.83
Unconfined yield strength σc (kPa) 12.0 20.8 13.4 8.21 8.98
Major principal stress σ1 (kPa) 27.4 34.5 35.6 26.7 27.7
Flow function ffc (–) 2.29 1.66 2.65 3.25 2.01
Bulk density ρb (g/cm3) 0.53 0.71 1.38 0.60 0.86
Compressibility (15 kPa) C15kPa (%) 25.4 37.2 23.1 18.4 19.7
Particle size (10%) d10 (μm) 0.79 1.20 1.04 0.60 0.54
Particle size (50%) d50 (μm) 13.81 4.34 4.19 12.36 11.89
Particle size (90%) d90 (μm) 35.78 11.82 11.26 35.57 33.12
Particle size (avg.) d (μm) 16.47 5.56 5.35 15.81 13.56

Table 2.

Chemical composition of compounds used (wt%).

Iron oxide Strontium/barium carbonate
Fe2O3 Min. 99.0% SrCO3/BaCO3 Min. 98.0%
MnO Max. 0.30% BaO Max. 1.90%
SiO2 Max. 0.05% CaO Max. 0.17 %
Al2O3 Max. 0.10% Na2O (+ K2O) Max. 0.10%
Cr2O3 Max. 0.03% Fe2O3 Max. 0.006%
CaO Max. 0.04% Al2O3 Max. 0.01%
MgO Max. 0.02% SO3 Max. 0.40%
CuO Max. 0.02%
SO3− Max. 0.10%
Cl Max. 0.15%
Na2O + K2O Max. 0.04%

The iron oxide is a deep red powder with a mean grain size of 16.5 μm and spherical particle shape with sharp-edged chipped fragments. The flow function is defined as the ratio of the principal normal stress to the interstitial strength of the powder. It determines the cohesiveness or, conversely, the ability to flow freely. Iron oxide can be classified as a cohesive powder according to its flow function. Since cohesive properties are often associated with average compressibility, Fe2O3 showed moderate compressibility during testing, typical of most powders. Strontium carbonate and barium carbonate are white powders with a rod-shaped grain size of approximately 5.5 μm in the middle. These small particles make the SrCO3 and BaCO3 samples very cohesive (ffc < 2) and form agglomerates. SrCO3 exhibits the highest internal friction angles, cohesiveness and ultimate strength and the worst flow characteristics of all tested samples. The very fine particles also cause a high compressibility of 37.2% at a normal stress of 15 kPa.

Finally, two mixture samples denoted Sr_MIX and Ba_MIX were prepared in a given weight ratio of Fe2O3:SrCO3 (86.35:13.65) and Fe2O3:BaCO3 (88.74:17.52), respectively. A molar ratio of Fe2O3/SrCO3 (BaCO3) of 5.85 ± 0.1 was used. The weight ratio of input materials is based on the technological specification of the collaborating manufacturer of hard ferrite magnets. These two feedstock mixtures were subsequently used to produce two types of strontium- and barium-based ferrite powders. Mixing input powders improves the flow properties, with the smaller SrCO3 and BaCO3 particles enveloping the larger Fe2O3 particles and acting as an additive to promote flow. This reduces the internal friction angle and compressibility while filling the interparticle space more efficiently. Characterization of the mixtures is essential from a processing point of view. Shear and flow properties could be important in homogenization and handling processes during production. The mechanical and physical properties of the mixtures are compared to the input powders in the last two columns of Table 1.

The SEM images (FEI Quanta 650 FEG scanning electron microscope) of Fe2O3, SrCO3 and their mixtures are presented in Fig. 1. The micrographs show larger Fe2O3 particles with a wider particle size distribution and needle-like smaller SrCO3 particles. The mixture image confirms a uniform and homogeneous distribution of both components, with smaller particles adhering to the surface of the larger particles. The formed agglomerates are important for the chemical reactions during calcination. A similar microstructure is detected for the Fe2O3:BaCO3 mixture.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

SEM micrographs of input powders: (a) Fe2O3; (b) SrCO3; (c) Sr_MIX (Fe2O3:SrCO3).

Samples preparation

Figure 2 shows the preparation process of ferrite powders. A laboratory rotary drum with a diameter of 140 mm and a length of 250 mm was used for mixing and granulation, with a speed of approximately 60 rpm. During granulation, water was gradually added in the form of aerosol. The resulting granulates with a 20–23% moisture content were dried freely in the air for one day. The granulates were calcined in a laboratory oven and preheated to the desired sample temperature (1100–1300 °C)—the remaining moisture content evaporated during the calcination process. The calcination time was set to 2 h, after which the samples were cooled freely in the oven to ambient temperature. After calcination, the samples were crushed and milled with a laboratory grinder to the required granulometry, according to Table 3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Ferrite powder samples preparation: (a) homogenization; (b) granulation; (c) granulate structure; (d) granules.

Table 3.

Prepared strontium- and barium-based ferrite powders; calcination temperature Tc, particle size distributions d10, d50, d90, davg and density ρ.

Sample Tc (°C) d10 (µm) d50 (µm) d90 (µm) davg (µm) ρ (g/cm3)
Sr_4.1 1150 56.52 82.46 120.26 85.38 5.27
Sr_5.1 1200 50.23 79.42 118.99 81.79 5.14
Sr_1 (ref) ≈ 1250 28.80 67.31 157.29 82.73 5.25
Sr_6.1 1250 50.95 83.03 142.42 91.83 5.11
Sr_7.1 1300 31.00 74.42 151.07 84.92 5.12
Ba_1.2 1100 15.15 52.81 126.05 63.17 5.39
Ba_3.2 1200 16.49 78.79 144.34 75.79 5.33
Ba_4.2 1250 24.73 86.18 152.66 87.86 5.30
Ba_5.2 1300 29.50 93.24 155.49 93.63 5.33
Ba_1 1100 21.52 43.03 68.57 45.18 5.36
Ba_2.1 1150 24.07 43.41 67.52 45.19 5.33
Ba_3.1 1200 18.48 50.32 83.34 51.03 5.30
Ba_4.1 1250 20.14 43.03 70.56 44.53 5.30
Ba_5.1 1300 16.93 49.54 74.37 48.63 5.31

Characterization techniques

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed on a Bruker-AXS D8 Advance (Germany) in 2Θ/Θ geometry with a position-sensitive LynxEye detector under the following conditions: CuKα/Ni filter radiation, 40 kV voltage, 40 mA current, step mode with 0.014° 2Θ step with a total time per step of 2 s (summation of five measurements with 0.25 s step) and digital processing of the resulting data. The Bruker Diffrac Suite software was used for measurements and data evaluation. The quantification was based on the Rietveld method of structural analysis from powder diffraction data. It consisted of modelling the diffraction spectra using known structural data (lattice parameters, positions of atoms in the structure, spatial group, occupancy factors, etc.). Input structural data were taken from the Bruker DiffracPlus Topas structure database (hematite), from the COD database (Crystallographic Open Database—SrFe12O19), and the American Mineralogist crystal structure database (BaFe12O19).

An FEI Quanta-650 FEG auto-emission electron microscope from FEI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for photographic documentation and identifying individual minerals. The imaging was performed using a back-scattered electron detector (BSED) in chemical gradient mode at 10 kV voltage and 4.5–5 µm beam diameter. Anton Paar Ultrapyc 5000 gas pycnometer was used for powder density determination.

Magnetic measurements using a MicroSense EZ9 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) were performed to confirm and characterise the ferromagnetic state in the studied samples. The measured magnetization curves at room temperature show the dependence of the magnetic polarization J of the sample on the external magnetic field H (J–H curves). The maximal applied magnetic field was ± 1600 kA/m (± 2 T). We also plotted B–H curves representing the dependence of the magnetic induction B on the external magnetic field H. The following magnetic parameters were obtained from the J–H and B–H curves: the maximum energy product, (BH)max; remanent magnetic induction, Br; coercivity of the J-H curve, HcJ; coercivity of the B-H curve, HcB. The interparticle magnetic interactions of prepared powders were analysed using the Henkel plot (ΔM function). It describes the relationship between the virgin Mvir (H) and the magnetization curve M(H) using the relation:

ΔMH=MvirH-0.5·MupH+MdownH 1

where Mup(H) and Mdown(H) are magnetizations in increasing and decreasing positive magnetic field H. Demagnetization of the samples takes place in an alternating magnetic field with an exponential amplitude decrease coefficient of 0.95.

Results and discussion

Table 3 lists all the samples of SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19 ferrite powders that were prepared for physical properties testing. The reference sample Sr_1 was taken directly from the research company production and characterised the current SrFe12O19 production technology. Figure 3a–f shows the SEM morphology of chosen SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19 samples calcined for 2 h at different calcination temperatures. The presence of large and small hexagonal-like platelet particles, in addition to semi-circular polyhedral particles, was observed. The agglomerates contained a wide distribution of particles with sizes between 1 and 150 μm), and the average particle size was about 70 to 90 (m) (top and middle part of Table 3). Due to the deterioration of the magnetic properties, Ba-based hexaferrites were also prepared with a lower average particle size of around 45–50 μm (lower part of Table 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

SEM micrographs of selected SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19 hexaferrites: (a) Sr_1; (b) Sr_4.1; (c) Sr_7.1; (d) Ba_1.2; (e) Ba_5.1; (f) Ba_5.2.

The XRD patterns of selected SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19 ferrite powders are shown in Fig. 4, and the results of the Rietveld analysis of all samples are summarized in Table 4. The diffractograms confirm the existence of two main phases: SrFe12O19 (BaFe12O19) and Fe2O3. All prepared Ba-based hexaferrites contain only about 2 wt% of hematite, which confirms their high structural homogeneity. In the case of Sr-based samples, unreacted hematite is more abundant. The reference sample exhibited a high percentage of hematite with a content of about 39 wt%. On the contrary, the laboratory-prepared Sr samples showed a lower hematite concentration ranging between 7 and 12%, weakly dependent on the calcination temperature. The reason is a different way of calcination of the reference sample that was placed in a rotary oven heated to 1430 ± 20 °C and calcined for 45 ± 5 min, during which the temperature gradually decreased to 1000 °C. Finally, the sample was cooled down to room temperature inside the oven. To optimise and reduce the energy consumption of the industrial plant, the research objective was to investigate the behaviour of the hematite content for temperatures up to 1300 °C. Therefore, the calcination temperature of the reference sample cannot be precisely determined and should range around the mean value of 1250 °C. These results clearly show the high sensitivity of Sr hexaferrite structure to the calcination procedure.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

XRD diffractograms of selected hexaferrite samples: (a) Sr_1; (b) Sr_6.1; (c) Sr_7.1; (d) Ba_5.1.

Table 4.

Structural data of the strontium- and barium-based ferrite powders; calcination temperature Tc, mean particle size davg and lattice parameters a and c obtained from the Rietveld analysis.

Sample Tc (°C) davg (µm) Hematite SrFe12O19/BaFe12O19
Content (wt%) a (Å) c (Å) Content (wt%) a (Å) c (Å)
Sr_4.1 1150 85.38 11.81 5.270 13.747 88.19 5.882 23.050
Sr_5.1 1200 81.79 6.97 5.036 13.747 93.03 5.883 23.051
Sr_1 (ref) ≈ 1250 82.73 38.96 5.035 13.748 61.04 5.882 23.050
Sr_6.1 1250 91.83 9.13 5.036 13.746 90.87 5.882 23.049
Sr_7.1 1300 84.92 6.77 5.036 13.745 93.23 5.882 23.052
Ba_1.2 1100 63.17 2.06 5.033 13.752 97.94 5.893 23.201
Ba_3.2 1200 75.79 2.61 5.035 13.754 97.39 5.893 23.201
Ba_4.2 1250 87.86 1.41 5.029 13.781 98.59 5.893 23.203
Ba_5.2 1300 93.63 2.43 5.022 13.757 97.57 5.893 23.202
Ba_1 1100 45.18 2.52 5.033 13.761 97.48 5.893 23.201
Ba_2.1 1150 45.19 3.18 5.034 13.776 96.82 5.893 23.201
Ba_3.1 1200 51.03 3.15 5.032 13.757 96.85 5.893 23.202
Ba_4.1 1250 44.53 1.36 5.032 13.767 100.00 5.893 23.202
Ba_5.1 1300 48.63 2.73 5.034 13.758 97.27 5.893 23.203

The magnetic properties of prepared samples are presented in Figs. 5 and 6. Figure 5a and b show an example of J-H and B-H curves measured for strontium ferrite sample (Sr_4.1) calcined at 1150 °C with the average particle size of 80–90 μm, respectively. Henkel plots of strontium ferrite are shown in Fig. 6a. Henkel plots of barium ferrite are shown in Fig. 6b and c. The shape of both magnetization curves is similar for all powder samples, and the magnetic parameters obtained are summarized in Table 5. In the case of Sr-based samples, it can be seen that the parameters determined from the B–H curve − (BH)max, Br, HcB—increase with increasing calcination temperature. The Hcj has the opposite tendency at and above 1250 °C. Therefore, high (BH)max, Br and HcB values are observed for Sr_7.1 sample calcined at 1300 °C, however, the Hcj value (~ 208 kA/m) is a little lower compared to the other samples. The reference sample Sr_1 calcined at 1250 °C shows the highest Hcj value, but the lowest saturation magnetization MS due to the high amount of hematite detected by XRD measurements. If the calcination temperature exceeds 1300 °C, the magnetic properties of all parameters markedly deteriorate. Generally, the values of the magnetic parameters of laboratory-prepared micron-sized SrFe12O19 powders are comparable to those presented in the literature, e.g.31. However, better hard magnetic properties can be obtained if nanoparticles are used 31. Other published studies have confirmed the improvement of magnetic and crystallization properties with increasing calcination temperature32,33. This is also during low temperature synthesis34,35.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

J–H and B–H curves of the Sr_4.1 sample: (a) complete J–H curve measured at high magnetic fields (± 1600 kA/m) including the virgin curve; (b) J–H and B–H demagnetization curves (the second quadrant).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Henkel plots of prepared samples in dependence on the calcination temperature: (a) Strontium ferrite powders with the average particle size d = 80–90 µm; (bc) Barium ferrite powders with d = 80–90 µm and 45–50 µm, respectively.

Table 5.

Measured magnetic parameters of strontium- and barium-based ferrite powders in dependence on calcination temperature, e.g. (BH)max—maximum energy product, Br—remanent magnetic induction, HcB—coercivity of the B–H curve, HcJ—coercivity of the J–H curve, MS—saturation magnetization, ΔMmax, ΔMmin—the strongest positive and negative magnetic interactions.

Sample Calcination temperature (°C) (BH)max (J/m3) Br (mT) HcB (kA/m) HcJ (kA/m) MS (Am2/kg) ΔMmax (kA/m) Hmax (kA/m) ΔMmin (kA/m) Hmin (kA/m)
Sr_4.1 1150 289 42.6 28.4 256.1 58.19 5.2 31.9 − 2.3 407.8
Sr_5.1 1200 632 60.2 39.6 265.5 64.54 1.7 30.3 − 5.8 358.1
Sr_1 (ref.) 1250 665 59.3 44.3 289.5 39.27 0.5 54.1 − 5.5 358.1
Sr_6.1 1250 567 59.1 39.6 186.1 63.05 11.5 38.2 − 2.7 358.1
Sr_7.1 1300 930 72.8 50.8 208.2 62.86 6.6 109.8 − 5.6 307.2
Ba_1.2 1100 502 51.7 38.0 217.9 65.69 0.4 44.6 − 5.0 308.8
Ba_3.2 1200 507 52.5 36.5 138.3 65.49 5.3 33.4 − 5.1 296.1
Ba_4.2 1250 428 58.2 28.4 109.6 65.61 − 0.1 0.0 − 4.9 245.1
Ba_5.2 1300 303 47.0 26.8 119.2 65.84 11.9 33.4 − 1.3 358.2
Ba_1 1100 465 50.1 36.5 195.6 65.38 5.0 43.0 − 3.8 318.3
Ba_2.1 1150 538 53.7 39.6 192.3 65.01 2.8 44.6 − 4.8 305.6
Ba_3.1 1200 638 58.5 42.7 192.3 65.40 1.1 44.6 − 6.7 300.8
Ba_4.1 1250 628 65.2 38.0 108.0 65.36 9.7 33.4 − 3.0 297.6
Ba_5.1 1300 722 63.4 44.3 176.4 65.27 7.0 101.9 − 3.9 265.8

The barium-based ferrites with an average particle size comparable to strontium samples are shown in the middle part of Table 5. Surprisingly, optimal magnetic characteristics exhibit the Ba_1.2 sample calcined at the lowest temperature of 1100 °C. An increase in the calcination temperature leads to a decrease in almost all magnetic parameters except for Br and MS. In general, the values of the magnetic parameters of Ba samples are much lower than Sr. Based on these results, another series of Ba-based samples with a smaller average particle size of around 45–50 µm was prepared. Their magnetic properties presented at the bottom part of Table 4 were improved and partially followed the magnetic behaviour of Sr-based hexaferrites. The Ba_5.1 sample calcined at 1300 °C appears to be optimal. However, its magnetic parameters are slightly worse than those of the Sr_7.1 powder. Similar magnetic properties of BaFe12O19 hexaferrites were presented, for example, in reference28, where the powders of average particle size of 35 µm were prepared by ceramic method.

The interparticle magnetic interactions described by ΔM function in Eq. (1) can reach positive or negative values depending on the magnetization value of the virgin curve Mvir (H) with respect to the Mup (H) and Mdown (H) magnetizations. If the value of Mvir (H) is greater than the mean value of Mup (H) and Mdown (H), positive interactions arise related to the exchange coupling among particles. In the opposite case, ΔM (H) < 0 and negative dipolar interactions, produced by the magnetic moment of each particle, dominate. The complicated shape of the virgin curve shown in Fig. 5a indicates that both types of interactions will be present in the prepared powder samples. The obtained Henkel plots of Sr- and Ba-based hexaferrites are compared in Fig. 6. It is evident that the exchange-coupling interactions observed at small magnetic fields H gradually turn into dipolar interactions with increasing H. Such magnetization behaviour is typical also for NdFeB hard magnetic nanoparticles36 and nanocomposite magnets37. The strongest positive (ΔMmax) and negative (ΔMmin) interactions and the corresponding magnetic fields at which these interactions arise are listed in the right-hand columns of Table 5.

Similar shapes of the Henkel plots depending on the calcination temperature show Sr-based samples (Fig. 6a) and Ba-based samples with an average particle size of 45–50 µm (Fig. 6c). These results agree with hysteresis loop measurements. Optimal samples Sr_7.1 and Ba_5.1 calcined at 1300 °C have the strongest positive interactions shifted towards higher H and the negative interactions towards lower H. The strength of the interactions is variable and depends not only on the calcination temperature but also on the particle size.

The obtained values of magnetic properties are very similar to the study by Qiang et al.38. In their research, Rianna et al. synthesized SrFe12O19 from iron sand with inferior magnetic properties39. Also, the XRD results were comparable to the results of these studies. Manchón-Gordón et al. got, during reactive flash sintering of SrFe12O19 ceramic permanent magnets, similar values of structural data and saturation magnetization but much higher values of maximum energy product (BH)max40.

Conclusions

The conclusions of the applied research show that even with economically optimized production, it is possible to achieve satisfactory magnetic properties of ferrite powder for producing hard ferrite magnets. Further research can be continued, e.g. by doping additive elements into the ferrite powder. The main conclusions of the influence of calcination temperature and particle size distribution on the physical properties of hexaferrite powders study are as follows:

  • The SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19 hexaferrites were successfully prepared by mixing and granulation from Fe2O3 and SrCO3 (BaCO3). Additional calcination for 2 h in the temperature range 1100–1300 °C and final crushing and milling to an average particle size of about 80–90 µm was used.

  • Observations during sample preparation and from the SEM images showed that replacing strontium carbonate with barium carbonate is more advantageous. Better flow properties of BaCO3 and the ease of achieving a higher degree of homogeneity with the desired concentration throughout the volume were observed.

  • The morphology of prepared hexaferrites revealed agglomerates consisting of large and small hexagonal-like platelet particles and semi-circular polyhedral particles. The XRD results detected the presence of two phases: dominant SrFe12O19 / BaFe12O19 and minor Fe2O3. The amount of hematite in Ba-based samples was only around 2 wt% and in Sr-based ferrites between 7 and 12 wt%. The highest amount of hematite (about 39 wt%) was observed in the reference sample.

  • The magnetic properties of prepared SrFe12O19 powders with a mean particle size of about 80–90 µm are comparable to the reference sample Sr_1. The sample calcined at 1300 °C achieved better magnetic parameters from the B-H curve, especially (B-H)max, than the reference sample. On the other hand, the highest value of Hcj parameter is obtained for the reference sample, and the magnitude of Hcj rather decreases with increasing calcination temperature. All laboratory-prepared samples have higher saturation magnetization than the reference sample due to a markedly lower amount of hematite.

  • While maintaining the mean particle size, replacing strontium with barium led to the marked deterioration of the magnetic properties of prepared powders. A sample calcined at 1100 °C appeared to be optimal.

  • A partial improvement in the magnetic properties of the Ba-based powders was achieved by reducing the mean particle size to 45–50 µm. The samples calcined above 1200 °C have magnetic parameters comparable to those of the reference sample, except for Hcj and MS.

  • The Henkel plots revealed a predominance of exchange-coupling (positive) and dipolar (negative) magnetic interactions at lower and higher applied magnetic fields. The strength of both types of interactions is variable, and as the calcination temperature increases, the positive and negative interactions shift to higher and lower magnetic fields.

Acknowledgements

Work is supported by Grants of SGS No. SP2023/035, Faculty of Mining and Geology, and SP2024/016, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB - Technical University Ostrava, Czech Republic. This paper was created as part of the project No. CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004631 Materials and technologies for sustainable development within the Jan Amos Komensky Operational Program financed by the European Union and from the state budget of the Czech Republic.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, J.H. and K.H.; methodology, J.H., K.H. and J.R.; validation, O.Ž., J.N. and D.Ž.; formal analysis, J.H., K.H. and J.R.; investigation, J.N. and J.D.; resources, J.N.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H., K.H. and J.R.; writing—review and editing, J.N., D.Ž., J.D. and O.Ž.; visualization, J.H. and J.D.; supervision, J.N. and O.Ž.; project administration, J.H. and J.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data availability

The data used in this study is available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10890728 and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10890791.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Qiu, J., Zhang, Q. & Gu, M. Effect of aluminum substitution on microwave absorption properties of barium hexaferrite. J. Appl. Phys.98(10), 103905 (2005). 10.1063/1.2135412 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dishovske, N., Petkov, A. & Nedkov, I. Hexaferrite contribution to microwave absorbers characteristics. IEEE Trans. Magn.30(2), 969–971 (1994). 10.1109/20.312461 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Langhof, N. & Göbbels, M. Hexaferrites and phase relations in the iron-rich part of the system Sr–La–Co–Fe–O. J. Solid State Chem.182(10), 2725–2732 (2009). 10.1016/j.jssc.2009.07.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shirk, B. T. & Bussem, W. R. Temperature dependence of Ms and K1 of BaFe12O19 and SrFe12O19 single crystals. J. Appl. Phys.40, 1294 (1969). 10.1063/1.1657636 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Topfer, J., Schwarzer, S., Senz, S. & Hesse, D. Influence of SiO2 and CaO additions on the microstructure and magnetic properties of sintered Sr-hexaferrite. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.25, 1681–1688 (2005). 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.06.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zi, Z. F. et al. Magnetic properties of c-axis oriented Sr0.8La0.2Fe11.8Co0.2O1.9 ferrite film prepared by chemical solution deposition. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.322(22), 3638–3641 (2010). 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.07.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morisako, A., Liu, X. & Matsumoto, M. The effect of underlayer for Ba-ferrite sputtered films on-axis orientation. J. Appl. Phys.81, 4374 (1997). 10.1063/1.364828 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wane, I. et al. Thick barium hexaferrite (Ba-M) films prepared by electron-beam evaporation for microwave application. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.211(1–3), 309–313 (2000). 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00752-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oliver, S. A., Yoon, S. D., Kozulin, I., Chen, M. L. & Vittoria, C. Growth and characterization of thick oriented barium hexaferrite films on MgO (111) substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett.76(24), 3612 (2000). 10.1063/1.126723 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shater, R. E. E. & El-Ghayyawz, E. H. Study of the sintering temperature and the sintering time period effects on the structural and magnetic properties of M-type hexaferrite BaFe12O19. J. Alloys Compd.739, 327–334 (2018). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.228 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richerson, D. R., Garcia, R. M., Ruiz, E. R., Rams, E. E. & Sanchez, R. M. Modern Ceramic Engineering (Marcel Dekker, 1992). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Castro, S. et al. Structural and magnetic properties of barium hexaferrite nanostructured particles prepared by the combustion method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.152, 61–69 (1996). 10.1016/0304-8853(95)00450-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Céspedes, E. et al. Inter-grain effects on the magnetism of M-type strontium ferrite. J. Alloys Compd.692, 280–287 (2017). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.318 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saini, A. et al. Magneto-dielectric properties of doped ferrite based nanosized ceramics over very high frequency range. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J.19(2), 911–916 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tan, G. & Chen, X. Structure and multiferroic properties of barium hexaferrite ceramics. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.327, 87–90 (2013). 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.09.047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li, L. et al. Attractive microwave-absorbing properties of M-BaFe12O19 ferrite. J. Alloys Compd.557, 11–17 (2013). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.12.148 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li, J. et al. Microstructure, magnetic and low-frequency microwave absorption properties of doped Co–Ti hexagonal barium ferrite nanoparticles. Ceram. Int.47(13), 19247–19253 (2021). 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.191 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zegzulka, J., Jezerska, L., Liptakova, T., Hlosta, J. & Necas, J. Study of structural and selected mechanical/physical properties of metal powders. Proceedings of the METAL 2015: 24th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials. 1457–1462, (2015).
  • 19.Hlosta, J., Zurovec, D., Zidek, M. & Zegzulka, J. Mechanical properties of powdered coal and their influence to technological processes. Inzynieria Mineralna-J. Pol. Min. Eng. Soc.2, 107–112 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dippong, T., Levei, E. A., Toloman, D., Barbu-Tudoran, L. & Cadar, O. Investigation on the formation, structural and photocatalytic properties of mixed Mn-Zn ferrites nanoparticles embedded in SiO2 matrix. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis158, 105281 (2021). 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105281 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dippong, T., Levei, E. A., Goga, F. & Cadar, O. Influence of Mn2+ substitution with Co2+ on structural, morphological and coloristic properties of MnFe2O4/SiO2 nanocomposites. Mater. Charact.172, 110835 (2021). 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110835 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dippong, T., Levei, E. A., Deac, G., Petean, L. & Borodi, G. Sol-gel synthesis, structure, morphology and magnetic properties of Ni0.6Mn0.4Fe2O4 nanoparticles embedded in SiO2 matrix. Nanomaterials11(12), 3455 (2021). 10.3390/nano11123455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dippong, T., Toloman, D., Dan, M., Levei, E. A. & Cadar, O. Structural, morphological and photocatalytic properties of Ni-Mn ferrites: Influence of the Ni:Mn ratio. J. Alloys Compd.913, 165129 (2022). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165129 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mahgoob, A. & Hudeish, A. Y. Thermal annealing effect on the structural and magnetic properties of barium hexaferrite powders. Middle East J. Sci. Res.15(6), 834–839 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brightlin, B. C. & Balamurugan, S. The effect of post annealing treatment on the citrate sol–gel derived nanocrystalline BaFe12O19 powder: Structural, morphological, optical and magnetic properties. Appl. Nanosci.6, 1199–1210 (2016). 10.1007/s13204-016-0531-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Castelliz, L. M., Kim, K. M. & Boucher, P. S. Preparation, stability range and high frequency permeability of some ferroxplana compounds. J. Can. Ceram. Soc.38, 57 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Neckenburger, E., Severin, H., Vogel, J. K. & Winkler, G. Z. Angew Ferrite hexagonaler Kristallstrustur mit hoher Grenzfre-quenz. Z. Angew Phys.18, 65 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vinnik, M. A. Phase relationships in the BaO-CoO-Fe2O3 system. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem.10, 1164–1167 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kuznetsova, S. I., Naiden, E. P. & Stepanova, T. N. Topotactic reaction kinetics in the formation of the hexagonal ferrite Ba3Co2Fe24O41. Inorg. Mater.24, 856 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Drobek, J., Bigelow, W. C. & Wells, R. G. Electron microscopic studies of growth structures in hexagonal ferrites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.44, 262 (1961). 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1961.tb15375.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shashanka, H. M., Anantharamaiah, P. N. & Joy, P. A. Magnetic parameters of SrFe12O19 sintered from a mixture of nanocrystalline and micron-sized powders. Ceram. Int.45(10), 13592–13596 (2019). 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wagner, D. V., Kareva, K. V., Zhuravlev, V. A., Dotsenko, O. A. & Minin, R. V. Investigation of BaFe12O19 hexaferrites manufactured by various synthesis methods using a developed pulsed magnetometer. Inventions8(1), 26 (2023). 10.3390/inventions8010026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dippong, T., Levei, E. A., Leostean, C. & Cadar, O. Impact of annealing temperature and ferrite content embedded in SiO2 matrix on the structure, morphology and magnetic characteristics of (Co0.4Mn0.6Fe2O4)δ (SiO2)100-δ nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd.868, 159203 (2021). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159203 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ştefănescu, M., Dippong, T., Stoia, M. & Ştefănescu, O. Study on the obtaining of cobalt oxides by thermal decomposition of some complex combinations, undispersed and dispersed in SiO2 matrix. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.94(2), 389–393 (2008). 10.1007/s10973-008-9111-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stoia, M., Stefanescu, M., Dippong, T., Stefanescu, O. & Barvinschi, P. Low temperature synthesis of Co2SiO4/SiO2 nanocomposite using a modified sol–gel method. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.54(1), 49–56 (2010). 10.1007/s10971-010-2156-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Deheri, P. K., Swaminathan, V., Bhame, S. D., Liu, Z. & Ramanujan, R. V. Sol−gel based chemical synthesis of Nd2Fe14B hard magnetic nanoparticles. Chem. Mater.22(24), 6509–6517 (2010). 10.1021/cm103148n [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yang, J. et al. Structural and magnetic properties of nanocomposite Nd–Fe–B prepared by rapid thermal processing. Engineering6(2), 132–140 (2020). 10.1016/j.eng.2019.12.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zheng, Q., Li, L., Yang, X., Bian, B. & Du, J. Effect of surfactant-assisted low-temperature annealing on the refinement of particle size and enhancement of magnetic properties of SrFe12O19 ferrite. Ceram. Int.50(9), 16520–16524 (2024). 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.02.139 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rianna, M. et al. Enhanced calcination temperatures of SrFe12O19 synthesized by local iron sand from Lombok Island. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng.8, 100530 (2023). 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100530 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Manchón-Gordón, A. F., Sánchez-Jiménez, P. E., Blázquez, J. S., Perejón, A. & Pérez-Maqueda, L. A. Reactive flash sintering of SrFe12O19 ceramic permanent magnets. J. Alloys Compd.922, 166203 (2022). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166203 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study is available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10890728 and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10890791.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES