Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1997 Dec;54(12):841–847. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.12.841

A systematic review of controlled clinical trials on the prevention of back pain in industry.

M N van Poppel 1, B W Koes 1, T Smid 1, L M Bouter 1
PMCID: PMC1128963  PMID: 9470890

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of lumbar supports, education, and exercise in the prevention of back pain in industry. METHODS: A computerised search for controlled clinical trials was conducted. A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. The available evidence for the effectiveness of the interventions was graded with a rating system for the level of evidence. Effect sizes of individual studies were combined if the studies were sufficiently similar. RESULTS: 11 studies were identified for the review. The methodological quality of all studies was low, with a maximum score of three out of seven for internal validity. There was no evidence for the effectiveness of lumbar supports due to contradictory outcomes of the studies. Five of the six studies on education reported no effect. Thus there is limited evidence that education does not help to prevent back pain. All three studies on exercise reported a positive result, indicating limited evidence for the effectiveness of exercise. The combined effect size for exercise was 0.53, which is a medium sized effect. CONCLUSIONS: Although widely used, there is little evaluative research on the preventive measures studied here. The review showed that there is limited evidence that exercise has some effect in the prevention of back pain and that education is not effective. No conclusive evidence was found for or against the effectiveness of lumbar supports. Research of higher methodological quality is needed before firm conclusions on the effectiveness of lumbar supports, education, and exercise in the prevention of back pain in industry can be drawn.

Full text

PDF
841

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chalmers T. C., Smith H., Jr, Blackburn B., Silverman B., Schroeder B., Reitman D., Ambroz A. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials. 1981 May;2(1):31–49. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Daltroy L. H., Iversen M. D., Larson M. G., Ryan J., Zwerling C., Fossel A. H., Liang M. H. Teaching and social support: effects on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors to prevent low back injuries in industry. Health Educ Q. 1993 Spring;20(1):43–62. doi: 10.1177/109019819302000106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donchin M., Woolf O., Kaplan L., Floman Y. Secondary prevention of low-back pain. A clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990 Dec;15(12):1317–1320. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199012000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Feldstein A., Valanis B., Vollmer W., Stevens N., Overton C. The Back Injury Prevention Project pilot study. Assessing the effectiveness of back attack, an injury prevention program among nurses, aides, and orderlies. J Occup Med. 1993 Feb;35(2):114–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gebhardt W. A. Effectiveness of training to prevent job-related back pain: a meta-analysis. Br J Clin Psychol. 1994 Nov;33(Pt 4):571–574. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1994.tb01153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Genaidy A. M., Simmons R. J., Christensen D. M. Can back supports relieve the load on the lumbar spine for employees engaged in industrial operations? Ergonomics. 1995 May;38(5):996–1010. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gundewall B., Liljeqvist M., Hansson T. Primary prevention of back symptoms and absence from work. A prospective randomized study among hospital employees. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 Apr;18(5):587–594. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199304000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kellett K. M., Kellett D. A., Nordholm L. A. Effects of an exercise program on sick leave due to back pain. Phys Ther. 1991 Apr;71(4):283–293. doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.4.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koes B. W., Bouter L. M., Beckerman H., van der Heijden G. J., Knipschild P. G. Physiotherapy exercises and back pain: a blinded review. BMJ. 1991 Jun 29;302(6792):1572–1576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6792.1572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koes B. W., van Tulder M. W., van der Windt W. M., Bouter L. M. The efficacy of back schools: a review of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;47(8):851–862. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lahad A., Malter A. D., Berg A. O., Deyo R. A. The effectiveness of four interventions for the prevention of low back pain. JAMA. 1994 Oct 26;272(16):1286–1291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Minor S. D. Use of back belts in occupational settings. Phys Ther. 1996 Apr;76(4):403–408. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.4.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moher D., Jadad A. R., Nichol G., Penman M., Tugwell P., Walsh S. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Trials. 1995 Feb;16(1):62–73. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nordin M., Cedraschi C., Balagué F., Roux E. B. Back schools in prevention of chronicity. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1992 Oct;6(3):685–703. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Reddell C. R., Congleton J. J., Dale Huchingson R., Montgomery J. F. An evaluation of a weightlifting belt and back injury prevention training class for airline baggage handlers. Appl Ergon. 1992 Oct;23(5):319–329. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90293-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scheer S. J., Radack K. L., O'Brien D. R., Jr Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 1. Acute interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Oct;76(10):966–973. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J., Altman D. G. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408–412. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walsh N. E., Schwartz R. K. The influence of prophylactic orthoses on abdominal strength and low back injury in the workplace. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Oct;69(5):245–250. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199010000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. van Tulder M. W., Koes B. W., Bouter L. M. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain. 1995 Aug;62(2):233–240. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00272-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES