Abstract
Purpose of Review
Highlight the mechanisms through which vasopressin and hypertonic stress regulate protein metabolism
Recent Findings
Mammals have an “aestivation-like” response in which hypertonic stress increases muscle catabolism and urea production
Vasopressin can directly regulate ureagenesis in the liver and the kidney
In humans chronic hypertonic stress is associated with premature aging, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality
Summary
There is an evolutionarily conserved “aestivation-like” response in humans in which hypertonic stress results in activation of the vasopressin system, muscle catabolism, and ureagenesis in order to promote water conservation.
Keywords: Vasopressin, aestivation, urea, muscle wasting
Introduction
Water is key to life; thus, water restriction is one of the most extreme stresses on biological systems. As such, all living organisms have developed mechanisms to defend against dehydration stress. With its evolutionary origins some 650 million years ago in Urbilateria, the vasopressin system is the preeminent regulator of water homeostasis in mammals [1]. In humans, vasopressin is a nine amino-acid peptide hormone that is mainly produced in the hypothalamus and released into the blood by the posterior pituitary in response to low blood pressure or hypertonic stress. Circulating vasopressin then binds to V1a, V1b, and V2 receptors that are primarily expressed in the vasculature and kidney, leading to increased blood pressure and increased water reabsorption. In addition to its roles regulating blood pressure and water balance, vasopressin has been identified as a key regulator of metabolism [2] and poor hydration status is associated with a myriad of poor health outcomes [3]. More specifically, vasopressin has been shown to directly regulate the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins. We and others have reviewed the role of vasopressin in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism [4–7]. The focus of this review will be the relationship between vasopressin and protein metabolism as it relates to urea and water conservation.
Urea metabolism in the kidney and the liver
When the body is faced with hypertonic stress, the first task is to conserve water. In most cases, water is lost through sweat, stool, and ventilation (termed insensible losses) and urine. While vasopressin can regulate insensible fluid losses [8–11], urine accounts for most of the water lost from the body. Thus, vasopressin’s major role in limiting water losses is to utilize urea to concentrate the urine and maximize water reabsorption.
Urea is an organic osmolyte produced in the liver through the urea cycle [12] (Figure 1). The urea cycle is required for the disposal of ammonia, which is one of the byproducts of protein catabolism. Urea production rate is known to be proportional to protein intake and urea production is impaired in liver disease, while urea excretion is impaired in kidney disease [13].
Figure 1 – “Aestivation like” response to hypertonic stress –
Hypertonic stress leads to higher vasopressin levels, increases in glucocorticoid mediated muscle catabolism, increased ureagenesis in the liver, and accumulation of urea the kidney. Together this “aestivation-like” response promotes water conservation. Lightning bolts denote steps that are regulated by vasopressin in vitro and/or in vivo. NKCC2 – Na:K:2Cl cotransporter 2, AQP2 – Aquaporin 2, UT-A1-3 – Urea Transporter A1-A3 respectively. Figure created with BioRender.
Urinary concentration is the process through which the kidney reabsorbs water from the tubular fluid to minimize water excretion. A detailed description of the mechanisms of urinary concentration and dilution is beyond the scope of this manuscript and have been reviewed in-depth previously [14] [15]. Briefly, the kidney concentrates urine through the “counter current multiplier” system in which, the recirculation of NaCl and urea between the collecting ducts, the vasa recta, and the ascending loop of Henle of juxtamedullary nephrons creates an osmotic gradient from the outer medulla to the tip of the tip of the inner medulla. This osmotic gradient favors water reabsorption from the ultrafiltrate (Figure 1). Vasopressin is a key regulator of both the urea transporters and water channels involved in urinary concentration. When vasopressin concentration increases, V2R stimulation in the kidney leads to increased expression and membrane abundance of the water channel aquaporin-2 (AQP2), and urea transporters (UT-A1, UT-A2, and UT-A3) [14–18] (Figure 1). Mice lacking AQP2, UT-A1, UT-A3 develop severe polyuria, highlighting that these transporters are necessary to maximize urinary concentration [19–22]. Specifically, the role of urea and protein metabolism in urinary concentration was highlighted in UT-A1/3 knockout mice. When fed a high protein diet (which increases urea production) UT-A1/3 knockout mice were unable to appropriately concentrate urine after water restriction; this effect was lost when placed on a low protein diet [20, 22]. These observations confirmed the original hypothesis by Wirz and Berliner who proposed that urea would act as an osmotic diuretic unless the kidney collecting duct were able to concentrate urea in the medulla of the kidney [23–25] . Therefore, urea and urea recycling are critical elements without which urinary concentration is impaired. Much of the relationship between vasopressin and urea has focused on the mechanisms through which vasopressin regulates both urea and water transport in the kidney. Less is known about the relationship between vasopressin and the synthesis of urea.
Given the unique ability of the liver to synthesize urea, together with the absolute requirement of urea and vasopressin signaling for maximal urinary concentration, it would be potentially advantageous for vasopressin to regulate both processes, thus favoring more efficient urinary concentration. In fact, multiple groups have shown that vasopressin can increase ureagenesis in liver cells in vitro [26–28]. Moreover, Staddon and McGivan showed that vasopressin and glucagon can have additive effects increasing ureagenesis in isolated hepatocytes [27]. The regulation of ureagenesis and ammonia clearance in the liver by vasopressin likely requires functional V1aR, as the V2R is not expressed in the liver [29, 30]. Exactly how vasopressin regulates ureagenesis by V1aR is unclear. Hiroyama et al. found that mice deficient in V1aR had hyperammonaemia, increased rates of proteolysis, reduced intrahepatic blood volume, and varying levels of circulating blood amino acids. However, there were no differences in blood urea nitrogen levels between V1aR deficient mice and wild-type controls [31, 32]. These results suggest that V1aR regulates ammonia entry into the urea cycle, but V1aR mice did not display the typical characteristics of a urea cycle defect. Thus, it is unclear why V1aR deficient mice have impaired ammonia clearance. An alternative activation pathway for urea synthesis triggered via renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system might be playing a role [33]. However, in aggregate these observations suggest that V1aR stimulation in the liver can modulate nitrogen waste handling and ureagenesis [34].
Arginase is the last enzyme in the urea cycle and converts arginine to ornithine and produces urea (Figure 1). There are two isoforms of arginase, Arg1 which is mainly expressed in the liver and Arg2 which is highly expressed along the nephron and in particular in the S3 segment of the proximal tubule in the kidney (Figure 1). Since the kidney does not express all the enzymes required to complete the urea cycle, arginase-2 does not produce urea to eliminate nitrogenous waste, rather urea production by arginase-2 regulates L-arginine and L-ornithine and can influence cell proliferation [35] [36]. The specific function of arginase-2 in the kidney, has been difficult to elucidate. Stimulation of the V2R with desmopressin (dDAVP) leads to an increase in arginase-2 protein expression by 60% [37, 38] yet total-body arginase-2 deficient mice had increased levels of AQP-2 and more efficient urine concentration [39]. These results would suggest that arginase-2 expression blunts urinary concentrating ability. In contrast, Ansermet et al. showed kidney tubular epithelial cell-specific arginase-2 knockout impaired the corticomedullary urea gradient and impaired urinary concentration [36]. Although the specific function of arginase-2 remains unclear, these data suggest that in addition to regulation of membrane abundance and permeability of urea transporters, vasopressin can regulate renal specific ureagenesis [40].
Aestivation, water conservation, and vasopressin
What, if any, is the physiological and clinical relevance of vasopressin, protein metabolism and ureagenesis? Enhorning and colleagues reviewed the long-term health outcomes with poor hydration status and showed that measures attributed to underhydration including high plasma vasopressin, urinary concentration, and increased plasma sodium, are associated to chronic diseases and premature mortality [3]. Thus, it is of paramount importance to have a mechanistic understanding of the role that vasopressin, protein metabolism, and ureagenesis play in the development of chronic disease.
It is known that water restriction increases the rate of protein catabolism in both birds and mammals [41]. During hibernation, which primarily occurs in winter, protein and fat are catabolized to provide energy, heat, and conserve water. During aestivation, a state of lower metabolic rate and inactivity in animals in response to heat and/or arid conditions, both invertebrate and vertebrate species utilize protein and fat catabolism as a source of metabolic water [11, 42]. In aestivation, organic osmolyte production increases as a result of protein catabolism to promote net water conservation, and as discussed above, the main protein derived organic osmolyte is urea [5, 43].
Like aestivation, vasopressin signaling is conserved across multiple invertebrate and vertebrate species and is known to play a role in the osmoregulation of animals living in arid climates [5]. Thus, both aestivation and vasopressin signaling favor net osmolyte and urea production. In fact, the primacy of urea synthesis to maintain water balance is conserved across nature. For example, Australian green-striped burrowing frogs prioritize breakdown of non-essential jumping muscles for urea production during aestivation [44]. However, one of the best examples of reliance on protein metabolism and urea production to conserve water is the lungfish. Lungfish are obligate air-breathers that live in climates that alternate between wet and arid conditions. During the dry seasons, African lungfish will produce mucus from the skin, burrow in the mud and encase themselves in a cocoon for up to three years [45]. During this period of aestivation, lungfish shift their nitrogen balance from excreting ammonia through the gills to producing urea which accumulates in the body and is excreted on arousal by wet conditions [46]. Moreover, lungfish have a functional vasopressin signaling system which express V1aR and V2R orthologs and vasotocin, a biologically active evolutionary precursor of vasopressin that is highly upregulated during aestivation [45–48]. Importantly, it has now been shown that there is an “aestivation-like” response in mammals which aids in preventing dehydration and re-prioritizes muscle catabolism for urea generation and maintenance of water homeostasis [49–52]. In particular, Titze et al. have shown that high salt feeding induces muscle catabolism and ureagenesis in both mice and humans [52]. Moreover, Hultström et al. showed that dehydration activates an “aestivation-like” responses in critically ill patients with high osmolality [53, 54]. Hultström’s group showed that in critically ill patients with and without COVID-19, a high osmolality was associated with a shift in metabolism towards amino acid production from muscle breakdown and urea production [53, 54]. Whether vasopressin has direct effects on muscle catabolism is unresolved; both synthesis and breakdown have been reported in vitro and in vivo [34]. Of note, one provocative study found that underhydration was associated to sarcopenia in elderly adults [55]. Moreover, the “aestivation-like” response reported by various groups has shown both elevated vasopressin and a glucocorticoid dependent increase in muscle catabolism. Interestingly, glucocorticoid secretion by the adrenal medulla can be augmented by vasopressin [34, 52, 56]. Therefore, aestivation represents a conserved response in which organisms increase vasopressin production and prioritize protein catabolism for osmolyte generation and net water conservation [43, 49–52].
The mechanistic molecular pathways linking muscle catabolism, increased ureagenesis, and vasopressin remain incompletely understood. However, we will focus on the role of the nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 (NFAT5) also known as the tonicity-responsive enhancer-binding protein (TonEBP), which is the master regulator of osmolyte accumulation in cells and is required for the maintenance of the renal medullary hypertonicity [57–60]. NFAT5 is a transcription factor that is induced by hypertonic stress, leading to its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus where it can engage its target genes [61, 62]. NFAT5 regulates the expression of transporters that increase organic osmolytes such as the betaine (SLC6A12) and myo-inositol (SLC5A3) transporters, and well as the enzyme aldose reductase (AKR1B1) which converts glucose to sorbitol[63–66]. Increase abundance of these osmolytes is necessary for cells to the defend against intracellular water loss under the hypertonic conditions in the medulla and to contribute to the gradient necessary for urine concentration. For example, loss of aldose reductase results a diabetes insipidus phenotype[67, 68].
While it has not been directly studied if NFAT5 is stimulated by vasopressin, NFAT5 is a critical regulator of the vasopressin response. The increased tonicity in the renal medulla following stimulation of the V2R is sufficient for NFAT5 phosphorylation and activation [69]. In addition to organic osmolyte regulatory genes, NFAT5 target genes include AQP2 and the urea transporters UT-A1 and UT-A2 [70], and it has been implicated in AVP-independent regulation of these genes. Using mice expressing a dominant-negative NFAT5 in collecting duct cells, Lam et al showed that mice had submaximal urine concentration following water restriction or dDAVP administration [71]. While AQP2 and UT-A1 were upregulated, UT-A2 was not induced under these conditions, suggesting loss of NFAT5 activity results in impaired urea recycling within the kidney [71]. Whole body NFAT5 deletion in mice leads to early lethality and atrophy of the kidney medulla [72], while tissue-specific deletion of NFAT5 from principal cells results in nephrogenic diabetes insipidus that does not respond to dDAVP [59]. This suggests that NFAT5 is required for appropriate vasopressin signaling and maximal water conservation. NFAT5 expression and dysregulation has been linked to a multitude of metabolic diseases that closely mimic those associated with chronic underhydration [3, 60, 73–75], NFAT5 expression is upregulated under “aestivation-like” conditions [49], and NFAT5 in muscle has been linked to skeletal muscle formation [76]. Thus, understanding in what tissue and the specific molecular mechanisms through which NFAT5 carries out its biologic effects is critical to understanding the “aestivation-like” response to hypertonic stress.
Conclusion
Ancient, evolutionarily conserved systems in which vasopressin, protein metabolism and water conservation are regulated in parallel is present in humans. These systems are relevant to human disease, and more work is needed to understand the underlying biology to be able to develop new therapeutics for diseases like diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension and metabolic syndrome.
Key Points.
Aestivation is an evolutionarily conserved response to promote water conservation which promotes urea synthesis and muscle catabolism
Hypertonicity promotes muscle catabolism and increase urea synthesis
Vasopressin can directly regulate protein metabolism in the liver and the kidney
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project was supported by the Common Fund of the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health, and by NCI, NHGRI, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH, and NINDS. The data regarding AVPR1A and AVPR2 expression in the liver in this manuscript were obtained from: the GTEx Portal on 06/09/2024.
Financial Support
These studies were supported by NIH grants K08-DK135931 (JPA), Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIEHS ES103361-01 (JAW), JPA is a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program Scholar, JAW is ASN Kidney Cure career development scholar. JSC is supported by NHBLI 5R38HL167237.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
None
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest have been highlighted as follows:
* Of special interest
** of outstanding interest
- [1].Odekunle EA, Elphick MR. Comparative and Evolutionary Physiology of Vasopressin/ Oxytocin-Type Neuropeptide Signaling in Invertebrates. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Nakamura K, Velho G, Bouby N. Vasopressin and metabolic disorders: translation from experimental models to clinical use. J Intern Med 2017; 282:298–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Dmitrieva NI, Boehm M, Yancey PH, Enhorning S. Long-term health outcomes associated with hydration status. Nat Rev Nephrol 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** Outstanding review that summarizes the known mechanisms and associations of health outcomes to water metabolism and the vasopressin system
- [4].Watts JA, Arroyo JP. Rethinking Vasopressin: New Insights into Vasopressin Signaling and Its Implications. Kidney360 2023; 4:1174–1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * Review of the literature that explores vasopressin signagling and its role in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism
- [5].Bankir L Antidiuretic action of vasopressin: quantitative aspects and interaction between V1a and V2 receptor-mediated effects. Cardiovasc Res 2001; 51:372–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Bankir L, Bouby N, Speth RC et al. Glucagon revisited: Coordinated actions on the liver and kidney. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018; 146:119–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Bankir L, Roussel R, Bouby N. Protein- and diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration: role of glucagon, vasopressin, and urea. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2015; 309:F2–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Hew-Butler T, Noakes TD, Soldin SJ, Verbalis JG. Acute changes in arginine vasopressin, sweat, urine and serum sodium concentrations in exercising humans: does a coordinated homeostatic relationship exist? Br J Sports Med 2010; 44:710–715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Schapiro H, Britt LG. The action of vasopressin on the gastrointestinal tract. A review of the literature. Am J Dig Dis 1972; 17:649–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Taussig LM, Braunstein GD. Effects of vasopressin on sweat rate and composition in patients with diabetes insipidus and normal controls. J Invest Dermatol 1973; 60:197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Delles C, Rossitto G. Of Snails, Earthworms, and Men: Insights into Strategies to Preserve Water. Function (Oxf) 2022; 3:zqab071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Morris SM, Jr. Regulation of enzymes of the urea cycle and arginine metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr 2002; 22:87–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Rudman D, DiFulco TJ, Galambos JT et al. Maximal rates of excretion and synthesis of urea in normal and cirrhotic subjects. J Clin Invest 1973; 52:2241–2249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Sands JM, Layton HE. The physiology of urinary concentration: an update. Semin Nephrol 2009; 29:178–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Klein JD, Blount MA, Sands JM. Urea transport in the kidney. Compr Physiol 2011; 1:699–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Olesen ETB, Fenton RA. Aquaporin 2 regulation: implications for water balance and polycystic kidney diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Hoffert JD, Fenton RA, Moeller HB et al. Vasopressin-stimulated increase in phosphorylation at Ser269 potentiates plasma membrane retention of aquaporin-2. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:24617–24627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Brown D The ins and outs of aquaporin-2 trafficking. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2003; 284:F893–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Rojek A, Fuchtbauer EM, Kwon TH et al. Severe urinary concentrating defect in renal collecting duct-selective AQP2 conditional-knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:6037–6042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Fenton RA, Chou CL, Stewart GS et al. Urinary concentrating defect in mice with selective deletion of phloretin-sensitive urea transporters in the renal collecting duct. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:7469–7474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Fenton RA. Urea transporters and renal function: lessons from knockout mice. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2008; 17:513–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Fenton RA, Flynn A, Shodeinde A et al. Renal phenotype of UT-A urea transporter knockout mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16:1583–1592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Hargitay B, Kuhn W, Wirz H. [A model experiment on the problem of urine concentration]. Helv Physiol Pharmacol Acta 1951; 9:C 26–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Berliner RW, Davidson DG. Production of hypertonic urine in the absence of pituitary antidiuretic hormone. J Clin Invest 1957; 36:1416–1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Berliner RW, Levinsky NG, Davidson DG, Eden M. Dilution and concentration of the urine and the action of antidiuretic hormone. Am J Med 1958; 24:730–744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Drew PJ, Monson JP, Metcalfe HK et al. The effect of arginine vasopressin on ureagenesis in isolated rat hepatocytes. Clin Sci (Lond) 1985; 69:231–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Staddon JM, McGivan JD. Distinct effects of glucagon and vasopressin on proline metabolism in isolated hepatocytes. The role of oxoglutarate dehydrogenase. Biochem J 1984; 217:477–483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Corvera S, Garcia-Sainz JA. Hormonal stimulation of mitochondrial glutaminase. Effects of vasopressin, angiotensin II, adrenaline and glucagon. Biochem J 1983; 210:957–960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Hems DA, Whitton PD. Stimulation by vasopressin of glycogen breakdown and gluconeogenesis in the perfused rat liver. Biochem J 1973; 136:705–709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Keppens S, de Wulf H. The activation of liver glycogen phosphorylase by vasopressin. FEBS Lett 1975; 51:29–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Koshimizu TA, Nasa Y, Tanoue A et al. V1a vasopressin receptors maintain normal blood pressure by regulating circulating blood volume and baroreflex sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:7807–7812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Hiroyama M, Aoyagi T, Fujiwara Y et al. Hyperammonaemia in V1a vasopressin receptor knockout mice caused by the promoted proteolysis and reduced intrahepatic blood volume. J Physiol 2007; 581:1183–1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Corley KC, Chan JC, Mauck HP et al. The synergistic effect of angiotensin II and urea on systemic blood pressure. Int J Pediatr Nephrol 1986; 7:227–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Koshimizu TA, Nakamura K, Egashira N et al. Vasopressin V1a and V1b receptors: from molecules to physiological systems. Physiol Rev 2012; 92:1813–1864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Uawithya P, Pisitkun T, Ruttenberg BE, Knepper MA. Transcriptional profiling of native inner medullary collecting duct cells from rat kidney. Physiol Genomics 2008; 32:229–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Ansermet C, Centeno G, Lagarrigue S et al. Renal tubular arginase-2 participates in the formation of the corticomedullary urea gradient and attenuates kidney damage in ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2020; 229:e13457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Zhao Y, Yang CR, Raghuram V et al. BIG: a large-scale data integration tool for renal physiology. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2016; 311:F787–F792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].van Balkom BW, Hoffert JD, Chou CL, Knepper MA. Proteomic analysis of long-term vasopressin action in the inner medullary collecting duct of the Brattleboro rat. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2004; 286:F216–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Huang J, Montani JP, Verrey F et al. Arginase-II negatively regulates renal aquaporin-2 and water reabsorption. FASEB J 2018; 32:5520–5531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Miller RL, Sandoval PC, Pisitkun T et al. Vasopressin inhibits apoptosis in renal collecting duct cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2013; 304:F177–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].McCue MD, Sandoval J, Beltran J, Gerson AR. Dehydration Causes Increased Reliance on Protein Oxidation in Mice: A Test of the Protein-for-Water Hypothesis in a Mammal. Physiol Biochem Zool 2017; 90:359–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Storey KB, Storey JM. Aestivation: signaling and hypometabolism. J Exp Biol 2012; 215:1425–1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Jiang C, Storey KB, Yang H, Sun L. Aestivation in Nature: Physiological Strategies and Evolutionary Adaptations in Hypometabolic States. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Mantle BL, Hudson NJ, Harper GS et al. Skeletal muscle atrophy occurs slowly and selectively during prolonged aestivation in Cyclorana alboguttata (Gunther 1867). J Exp Biol 2009; 212:3664–3672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Smith HW. METABOLISM OF THE LUNG-FISH, PROTOPTERUS AETHIOPICUS. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1930; 88:97–130. [Google Scholar]
- [46].Chew SF, Ho L, Ong TF et al. The African lungfish, Protopterus dolloi, detoxifies ammonia to urea during environmental ammonia exposure. Physiol Biochem Zool 2005; 78:31–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Konno N, Hyodo S, Yamaguchi Y et al. African lungfish, Protopterus annectens, possess an arginine vasotocin receptor homologous to the tetrapod V2-type receptor. J Exp Biol 2009; 212:2183–2193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Konno N, Hyodo S, Yamaguchi Y et al. Vasotocin/V2-type receptor/aquaporin axis exists in African lungfish kidney but is functional only in terrestrial condition. Endocrinology 2010; 151:1089–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Wild J, Jung R, Knopp T et al. Aestivation motifs explain hypertension and muscle mass loss in mice with psoriatic skin barrier defect. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2021; 232:e13628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Kovarik JJ, Morisawa N, Wild J et al. Adaptive physiological water conservation explains hypertension and muscle catabolism in experimental chronic renal failure. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2021; 232:e13629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Ogura T, Kitada K, Morisawa N et al. Contributions of renal water loss and skin water conservation to blood pressure elevation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertens Res 2023; 46:32–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * Intriguing study that links skin tissue sodium, water conservation, and urea metabolism in hypertension.
- [52].Kitada K, Daub S, Zhang Y et al. High salt intake reprioritizes osmolyte and energy metabolism for body fluid conservation. J Clin Invest 2017; 127:1944–1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Hultstrom M, Lipcsey M, Morrison DR et al. Dehydration is associated with production of organic osmolytes and predicts physical long-term symptoms after COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care 2022; 26:322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Barrueta Tenhunen A, Butler-Laporte G, Yoshiji S et al. Metabolomic pattern associated with physical sequelae in patients presenting with respiratory symptoms validates the aestivation concept in dehydrated patients. Physiol Genomics 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * Novel study that establishes the presence of the “aestivation-like” response in humans
- [55].Yoo JI, Choi H, Song SY et al. Relationship between water intake and skeletal muscle mass in elderly Koreans: A nationwide population-based study. Nutrition 2018; 53:38–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Rakova N, Kitada K, Lerchl K et al. Increased salt consumption induces body water conservation and decreases fluid intake. J Clin Invest 2017; 127:1932–1943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Miyakawa H, Woo SK, Dahl SC et al. Tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein, a rel-like protein that stimulates transcription in response to hypertonicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:2538–2542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Chernyakov D, Fischer A, Brandau M et al. The nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 (NFAT5) contributes to the renal corticomedullary differences in gene expression. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Petrillo F, Chernyakov D, Esteva-Font C et al. Genetic deletion of the nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 in collecting duct principal cells causes nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. FASEB J 2022; 36:e22583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Choi SY, Lee-Kwon W, Kwon HM. The evolving role of TonEBP as an immunometabolic stress protein. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020; 16:352–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Ferraris JD, Williams CK, Persaud P et al. Activity of the TonEBP/OREBP transactivation domain varies directly with extracellular NaCl concentration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:739–744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Dahl SC, Handler JS, Kwon HM. Hypertonicity-induced phosphorylation and nuclear localization of the transcription factor TonEBP. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001; 280:C248–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Ono M, Izumi Y, Maruyama K et al. Characterization of gene expression in the kidney of renal tubular cell-specific NFAT5 knockout mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2024; 326:F394–F410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * Recent study that implicates renal tubular cell specific NFAT5 KO with tonic stress and immune function in the kidney.
- [64].Ko BC, Ruepp B, Bohren KM et al. Identification and characterization of multiple osmotic response sequences in the human aldose reductase gene. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:16431–16437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Rim JS, Atta MG, Dahl SC et al. Transcription of the sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter gene is regulated by multiple tonicity-responsive enhancers spread over 50 kilobase pairs in the 5’-flanking region. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:20615–20621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Takenaka M, Preston AS, Kwon HM, Handler JS. The tonicity-sensitive element that mediates increased transcription of the betaine transporter gene in response to hypertonic stress. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:29379–29381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Yang JY, Tam WY, Tam S et al. Genetic restoration of aldose reductase to the collecting tubules restores maturation of the urine concentrating mechanism. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2006; 291:F186–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Ho HT, Chung SK, Law JW et al. Aldose reductase-deficient mice develop nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:5840–5846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Gallazzini M, Yu MJ, Gunaratne R et al. c-Abl mediates high NaCl-induced phosphorylation and activation of the transcription factor TonEBP/OREBP. FASEB J 2010; 24:4325–4335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Nakayama Y, Peng T, Sands JM, Bagnasco SM. The TonE/TonEBP pathway mediates tonicity-responsive regulation of UT-A urea transporter expression. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:38275–38280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Lam AK, Ko BC, Tam S et al. Osmotic response element-binding protein (OREBP) is an essential regulator of the urine concentrating mechanism. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:48048–48054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Lopez-Rodriguez C, Antos CL, Shelton JM et al. Loss of NFAT5 results in renal atrophy and lack of tonicity-responsive gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:2392–2397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Tasevska I, Enhorning S, Christensson A et al. Increased Levels of Copeptin, a Surrogate Marker of Arginine Vasopressin, Are Associated with an Increased Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease in a General Population. Am J Nephrol 2016; 44:22–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].El Boustany R, Tasevska I, Meijer E et al. Plasma copeptin and chronic kidney disease risk in 3 European cohorts from the general population. JCI Insight 2018; 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Enhorning S, Melander O. The Vasopressin System in the Risk of Diabetes and Cardiorenal Disease, and Hydration as a Potential Lifestyle Intervention. Ann Nutr Metab 2018; 72 Suppl 2:21–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].O’Connor RS, Mills ST, Jones KA et al. A combinatorial role for NFAT5 in both myoblast migration and differentiation during skeletal muscle myogenesis. J Cell Sci 2007; 120:149–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]