Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Jul 2;16(7):e63679. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63679

Short-Term Outcomes of Patients With Hyponatremia Presenting to the Emergency Department: An Observational Study

Rakesh G Shekar 1, Mahaveer Singh Rodha 2, Ankur Sharma 3,, Amit Rohila 4, Kamla Kant Shukla 5, Rahul Choudhary 6, Gopal K Bohra 7
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11293598  PMID: 39092320

Abstract

Background: Hyponatremia is the predominant electrolyte imbalance disorder in the emergency department. It can manifest with a diverse array of symptoms, ranging from non-specific and moderate to severe and even life-threatening. There is a scarcity of literature addressing the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with hyponatremia presenting to the emergency department in the western part of Rajasthan. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of hyponatremia on the outcomes of patients presenting to the emergency department.

Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional, observational study, 200 patients aged more than 18 years who presented to the emergency department with serum sodium < 135 mEq/l were included. The triage of patients was determined by their primary complaints. The primary outcome was to study the clinical profile of patients with hyponatremia presenting to the emergency department. The secondary outcomes were to examine the etiology, i.e., hypovolemic, euvolemic, or hypervolemic, and the outcome of patients on the 7th day (patient admitted to the ward or intensive care unit) and the 28th day (discharged or death) with hyponatremia presenting to the emergency department. The clinical status of the patients was noted by telephonic follow-up in case they were not admitted for this period.

Results: Out of 200 patients, 66 (33%) had hypovolemic, 96 (48%) had euvolemic, and 38 (19%) had hypervolemic hyponatremia. We observed that seizures (84.2%), confusion (56%), and coma (77.7%) were the most common clinical features of patients with severe hyponatremia in the emergency, which was statistically significant than mild and moderate hyponatremia (p = 0.03, 0.023, and 0.029, respectively). On the 7th day of hospitalization, out of 181 (90.5%) admissions in the ward, 116 (64.08%) had severe hyponatremia, and out of 19 (9.5%) ICU admissions, 13 (68.4%) had severe hyponatremia. Death was seen in five (2.5%) patients, one (20%) in moderate and four (80%) in severe hyponatremia cases.

Conclusion: Most cases of hyponatremia in this study were euvolemic. Most patients experienced severe hyponatremia, and seizures, confusion, and coma were the most prevalent symptoms. These disorders must be recognized early to properly diagnose and treat hyponatremia and prevent its morbidity and death.

Keywords: mortality, icu, sodium, emergency, hyponatremia

Introduction

Hyponatremia is the most commonly observed disorder of fluid and electrolyte balance in clinical practice [1]. It is present in 15-20% of hospital emergency admissions and up to 20% of patients who are critically ill [2,3].

Hyponatremia can cause a wide range of symptoms, from non-specific and mild, such as weakness, spasms, cramps, fatigue, nausea, irritability, memory loss, and headaches, to severe and potentially fatal, such as seizures, decreased consciousness, coma, and cardiorespiratory distress [4,5]. Acute severe hyponatremia can cause lifelong brain injury, respiratory arrest, brain herniation, and death. Hyponatremia symptoms vary according to their onset, duration, and severity [6]. Symptoms are more prevalent in individuals with acute hyponatremia than in those with chronic hyponatremia due to brain volume adaptation, a mechanism that corrects hypotonicity-induced brain swelling [7]. The various clinical presentations, underlying causes, and potential for catastrophic consequences of this condition contribute to the complexity of patient care. It frequently indicates an imbalance in the regulation of bodily fluids, which can result from different underlying illnesses such as congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, and renal disease [6]. The difficulty of diagnosis, presence of concomitant illnesses, requirement for rigorous monitoring and therapy, risk of consequences, unpredictability in treatment response, and management of underlying causes can all contribute to lengthier hospital hospitalizations. Hyponatremia contributes to higher healthcare expenses due to prolonged hospital stays, extensive surveillance, treatment, and adverse outcomes [7].

There are limited studies in the literature regarding the clinical profile and outcome of patients with hyponatremia presenting to the emergency department of this part of the world, i.e., in the western part of Rajasthan, India, especially Jodhpur. It will help to determine the best use of available resources for hyponatremia management. Therefore, we planned this study to see whether the presence of hyponatremia affects the outcome of patients received in the emergency department.

Materials and methods

This prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was carried out in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital between September 2021 and June 2023. After obtaining ethical clearance from the institute's ethical committee (AIIMS/IEC/2021/3601), all the patients of age >18 years presenting to the emergency department with serum sodium < 135 mEq/l were included in the study. If a blood report was unavailable during the emergency presentation, arterial or venous blood gas was used to diagnose patients with hyponatremia. Patients of hyperglycemia with random blood sugar levels > 200 mg/dl, chronic kidney disease on maintenance hemodialysis, hyperlipidemia with total cholesterol levels > 200 mg/dl, and multiple myeloma were excluded, as these conditions can decrease the sodium level in the blood. Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants. If the patient was in altered sensorium, then consent was taken from the family member.

Patients coming to the emergency were triaged based on their chief complaints. After inclusion in the study, blood and urine samples were collected in a sterile container.

Plasma osmolality was calculated based on the following formula: 2 x [Na+] (meq/L) + glucose (mg/dl)/18 + blood urea nitrogen (mg/dl)/2.8. The clinical profile of patients with hyponatremia was studied. Based on the clinical findings and lab reports, hyponatremia was classified based on the etiology. Based on the lab reports, hyponatremia was classified as mild (130-134 mEq/L), moderate (125-129 mEq/L), and severe (<125 mEq/L). It was further classified based on clinical findings and volume status as hypovolemic, euvolemic, and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Accordingly, the patients were managed in the emergency, and their outcome was assessed on day seven and day 28 personally or telephonically. The primary objective was to study the clinical profile (demographic parameters, comorbidities, symptoms, drugs received, imaging, correction given, etc.) of patients with hyponatremia presenting to the emergency department. The secondary objectives were to study the etiology (hypovolemic, euvolemic, or hypervolemic) and outcome of patients on the 7th day (patient admitted in the ward or intensive care unit) and the 28th day (discharged or death) with hyponatremia presenting to the emergency department. The clinical status of the patients was noted by telephonic follow-up in case they were not admitted for this period.

Cumming et al. reported the prevalence of hyponatremia in their study as 13.4% [8]. Using this for sample size calculation, we estimated a sample size of 200 patients considering a 10% dropout rate using the formula (n = (z)2 p ( 1 - p ) / d2), where n is the sample size, z is the statistic corresponding to 95% level of confidence (1.96), p is prevalence (13.4), and d is tolerated margin of error (5%).

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 21.0 statistical program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used to analyze the data. To describe nominal data, frequency and percentages were utilized, and the chi-squared test was used to compare these data. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared using an unpaired t-test. P-values less than 0.05 were deemed statistically significant.

The reporting for this observational study complies with the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) recommendations.

Results

During the study period, 3794 patients had hyponatremia due to various reasons. Out of these, 3564 patients were excluded for multiple reasons. Finally, 200 patients with hyponatremia were included in this study, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants in the study.

Figure 1

ER: emergency room; CKD: chronic kidney disease.

Clinical profile, symptoms, comorbidities, drugs received, imaging, and correction given for hyponatremia to patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients presenting to the emergency department.

M: male; F: female; GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; CT: computed tomography; NS: normal saline.

Parameter Total patients (n = 200) Mild hyponatremia Moderate hyponatremia Severe hyponatremia P-value
Patient information  
Age <60 years 75 7 (9.3%) 26 (34.66%) 42 (56%) 0.146
>60 years 125 9 (7.2%) 29 (23.2%) 87 (69.6%)
Sex M 95 7 (7.3%) 26 (27.3%) 62 (65.2%) 0.974
F 105 9 (8.5%) 29 (27.6%) 67 (63.8%)
Clinical presentation  
Weakness 83 7 (8.4%) 24 (28.9%) 52 (62.6%) 0.873
Vomiting 62 3 (4.3%) 21 (33.8%) 38 (61.2%) 0.316
Seizure 19 0 (0%) 3 (15.2%) 16 (84.2%) 0.03
Confusion 78 3 (3.8%) 19 (24.3%) 56 (71.7%) 0.023
Coma 7 0 (0%) 2 (28.57%) 5 (71.42%) 0.029
GCS 13-15 129 13 (10.07%) 39 (30.2%) 77 (59.6%) 0.399
8-12 64 3 (4.6%) 14 (21.8%) 47 (73.4%)
<8 7 0 (0%) 2 (28.57%) 5 (71.42%)
Past medical history  
Cardiac failure 11 1 (9%) 3 (27.2%) 7 (63.6%) 1.00
Renal failure 10 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 7 (70%) 0.181
Liver cirrhosis 12 0 (0%) 5 (41.6%) 7 (58.3%) 0.493
Stroke 19 1 (5.2%) 3 (15.7%) 15 (78.9%) 0.507
Hypertension 69 6 (8.6%) 16 (23.1%) 47 (68.1%) 0.593
Hypothyroid 22 3 (13.6%) 10 (45.4%) 9 (40.9%) 0.36
On treatment  
Receiving drug Diuretic 23 1 (4.3%) 6 (26.08%) 16 (69.5%) 0.949
Other drug 10 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 7 (70%)
CT scan of the brain  
Normal 73 2 (2.7%) 19 (26.02%) 52 (71.2%) 0.138
Abnormal 28 2 (7.1%) 6 (21.4%) 20 (71.4%)
Hyponatremia correction by  
0.9% NS 85 10 (11.7%) 33 (38.8%) 42 (49.4%) 0.037
3% NS 75 0 (0%) 15 (20%) 60 (80%)
Diuretics 35 5 (14.2%) 7 (20%) 23 (65.7%)

Seizures (84.2%), confusion (71.7%), and coma (71.42%) were the most common clinical feature of patients with severe hyponatremia in the emergency, which was statistically significant than mild and moderate hyponatremia (p = 0.03, 0.023, and 0.029, respectively). Most of the patients were receiving diuretics. Other drugs received by the patients were escitalopram (two patients), sodium valproate (four patients), oxcarbamazepine (three patients), and quetiapine (one patient).

In our study, 16 (8%) patients had mild hyponatremia, out of which six (37.5%) were hypovolemic, five (31.25%) were euvolemic, and five (31.25%) were hypervolemic. Fifty-five (27.5%) patients had moderate hyponatremia, out of which 17 (30.9%) were hypovolemic, 29 (52.7%) were euvolemic, and nine (16.36%) were hypervolemic. A total of 129 (64.5%) patients had severe hyponatremia, out of which 43 (33.33%) were hypovolemic, 62 (48.06%) were euvolemic, and 24 (18.6%) were hypervolemic (Table 2 and Figure 2).

Table 2. Etiology of hyponatremia of patients presenting to the emergency department.

Etiology Mild Moderate Severe P-value
Hypovolemic hyponatremia 6 (37.5%) 17 (30.9%) 43 (33.33%) 0.585
Euvolemic hyponatremia 5 (31.25%) 29 (52.7%) 62 (48.06%)
Hypervolemic hyponatremia 5 (31.25%) 9 (16.36%) 24 (18.6%)

Figure 2. Bar chart showing the etiology of hyponatremia of patients presenting to the emergency department.

Figure 2

Na: sodium.

There was also a statistically significant difference in urine sodium values in various hyponatremia etiologies (Table 3).

Table 3. Urine sodium in various etiologies of hyponatremia.

Etiology Urine sodium (Ur Na) P-value
<20 meq/L >20 meq/L
Hypovolemic hyponatremia 23 (52.57%) 43 (27.5%) 0.01
Euvolemic hyponatremia 10 (22.7%) 86 (55.12%)
Hypervolemic hyponatremia 11 (25%) 27 (17.3%)

In our study, 116 patients admitted with severe hyponatremia were treated in the ward. They were not on any support and could be managed in the ward with only hyponatremia correction.

On the 28th day of follow-up, 195 (97.5%) patients were discharged, which included 16 (8.2%) mild, 54 (27.69%) moderate, and 125 (64.1%) severe hyponatremia patients. Death was seen in five (2.5%) patients, one (20%) in moderate and four (80%) in severe hyponatremia cases (Table 4 and Figure 3).

Table 4. Outcome of patients with hyponatremia presenting to the emergency department.

  Total patients (n = 200) Mild hyponatremia Moderate hyponatremia Severe hyponatremia P-value
7th day Patients in ward 181 15 (8.2%) 50 (27.6%) 116 (64.08%) 1.00
Patients in ICU 19 1 (5.2%) 5 (26.3%) 13 (68.4%)
28th day Discharge 195 16 (8.2%) 54 (27.69%) 125 (64.1%) 1.00
Death 5 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)

Figure 3. Bar chart showing outcome on the 28th day in patients with hyponatremia presenting to the emergency department.

Figure 3

Na: sodium.

Discussion

Hyponatremia is frequently observed in emergency rooms and has been found to increase mortality, mainly when it is severe [9]. In the current study, the most prevalent cause was euvolemic hyponatremia. It necessitated admission to the ICU for 9.5% of patients, while the majority (90.5%) were admitted to wards. To accurately diagnose and treat hyponatremia and prevent morbidity and mortality, it is imperative to identify these disorders at an early stage.

Lee et al. found that the initial signs of patients who presented with hyponatremia were generalized weakness (33.3%), seizure (28.6%), altered mental status (21.6%), confusion (9.5%), dizziness (4.8%), and non-specific (2.4%) [10]. In Bokemeyer et al.'s study, of the 261 patients with hyponatremia, 140 exhibited neurological symptoms [11]. Most of these symptoms (59%) were general weakness and disorientation. Babaliche et al. observed vomiting and confusion as the two most typical complaints in these patients [12]. In our study, the clinical presentation of patients with all grades (mild, moderate, and severe) of hyponatremia was weakness (41.5%), vomiting (31%), seizure (9.5%), confusion (39%), and coma (4.5%). In Mittal et al.'s study, when compared to mild hyponatremia, patients with severe hyponatremia had neurological symptoms more prevalent (69.7% versus 8.1%) [13]. Similarly, we observed that seizures (84.2%), confusion (56%), and coma (77.7%) were the most common clinical feature of patients with severe hyponatremia in an emergency, which was statistically significant than mild and moderate hyponatremia (p = 0.03, 0.023, and 0.029, respectively).

In Kaspa et al.'s study [14], comorbidities related to hyponatremia included cardiac issues (31%), renal issues (19%), respiratory issues (18%), hypertension (58%), and diabetes mellitus (55%). In our study, comorbidities related to hyponatremia included cardiac failure (5.5%), renal failure (5%), liver cirrhosis (6%), hypothyroidism (11%), hypertension (34.5%), and stroke (9.5%). We found that comorbidities were frequently seen in patients with severe hyponatremia compared to moderate and mild hyponatremia. We observed that 19 patients with prior stroke presented with altered sensorium due to hyponatremia in the present study.

Zhang et al. found that the medications most frequently linked to hyponatremia were proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (59.7%), loop diuretics (57.4%), potassium-preserving diuretics (29.5%), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (20.0%), thiazide diuretics (12.5%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (12.4%) [15]. In our study, diuretics (13 patients on loop diuretics and 10 on thiazide diuretics) were a cause of hyponatremia in 11.5% of patients, out of which 69.5% had severe hyponatremia. Other drugs, including escitalopram (two patients), sodium valproate (four patients), oxcarbamazepine (three patients), and quetiapine (one patient), causing hyponatremia were observed in 5% of patients.

In Prkačin et al.'s study, patients with hyponatremia in the emergency department were treated with 3% hypertonic saline [16]. In our study, out of the 85 patients who were managed with normal saline, 49.4% of patients had severe hyponatremia, and in 75 patients who were managed with 3% hypertonic saline, 80% of patients had severe hyponatremia. The patients usually presented to emergency with seizure, confusion, and coma and received a bolus of 3% hypertonic saline over 20-30 minutes. Diuretics were given in 23% of severe hyponatremia cases. These patients were primarily hypervolemic.

In Bokemeyer et al.'s study, focal neurological symptoms were present in 31% of cases, and neuroimaging was done on 68% of the symptomatic patients [11]. In our study, neuroimaging was done in 50.5% of patients, of which 36.5% had normal and 14% had abnormal neuroimaging. Most abnormal neuroimaging was associated with severe hyponatremia (71.4%), which included old infarcts, meningeal enhancement, cerebral edema, bleeding, and hydrocephalus.

Prkačin et al. found that improvement in patient clinical status was attained in 54% of patients with hyponatremia; 12% of patients did not survive the disease as a consequence of hyponatremia, whereas in 34% of patients, the clinical condition remained constant [10]. Isaak et al. found that patients who received treatment had considerably greater survival than those who did not [17]. More efforts should be made to ensure the treatment of severe hyponatremia in hospitalized patients. Severe hyponatremia resulted in a prolonged hospital stay. Additionally, moderate and severe hyponatremia were linked to a significant rise in in-hospital mortality, when compared to mild hyponatremia. In our study, most patients on the 7th day were admitted to wards (90.5%), while 9.5% of patients needed ICU admission, which was most commonly seen in severe hyponatremic patients.

Babaliche et al. [12] and Singh et al. [18] found that the most frequent cause of hyponatremia was euvolemic hyponatremia. In Mittal et al.'s study, 7.2% of patients had hypovolemic hyponatremia, 21.2% had hypervolemic hyponatremia, and 61.6% of patients had euvolemic hyponatremia [13]. In our study, 48.06% of patients with severe hyponatremia displayed euvolemia. Hypovolemia was seen in 33.33% and hypervolemia in 18.6% of severe hyponatremia. Thus, euvolemia was more common in our study.

This research has certain limitations. First and foremost, this is a single-center research. Our results may need to be more generalizable to other patient populations. In addition, the interpretation of variables causing hyponatremia was limited to one expert physician. Acute and chronic hyponatremia were not distinguished.

Conclusions

Euvolemic hyponatremia was identified as the most common etiology in this study. Hyponatremia symptoms can range from vomiting, lethargy, and malaise to disorientation, seizures, and coma. In our study, the majority of patients (90.5%) with hyponatremia were admitted to wards, whereas 9.5% required ICU admission. Mortality was reported in 2.5% of individuals admitted to the ICU with multiple comorbidities. These disorders must be identified early to correctly diagnose and treat hyponatremia and avoid morbidity and mortality.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. IEC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur issued approval AIIMS/IEC/2021/3601.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Ankur Sharma, Rakesh G. Shekar, Mahaveer Singh Rodha, Amit Rohila

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Ankur Sharma, Amit Rohila, Kamla Kant Shukla, Rahul Choudhary, Gopal K. Bohra

Drafting of the manuscript:  Ankur Sharma, Rakesh G. Shekar, Mahaveer Singh Rodha

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Ankur Sharma, Amit Rohila, Kamla Kant Shukla, Rahul Choudhary, Gopal K. Bohra

Supervision:  Mahaveer Singh Rodha

References

  • 1.Diagnosis and management of hyponatremia: a review. Adrogué HJ, Tucker BM, Madias NE. JAMA. 2022;328:280–291. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hyponatremia in the emergency department. Lindner G, Schwarz C, Haidinger M, Ravioli S. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;60:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter as a guide for correction of hyponatremia in the emergency department: a cross-sectional study. Uttanganakam S, Hansda U, Sahoo S, Shaji IM, Guru S, Topno N, Sahoo NK. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023;27:265–269. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.A conspectus of euvolemic hyponatremia, its various etiologies, and treatment modalities: a comprehensive review of the literature. Ghosal A, Qadeer HA, Nekkanti SK, Pradhan P, Okoye C, Waqar D. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clinical implications, evaluation, and management of hyponatremia in cirrhosis. Praharaj DL, Anand AC. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022;12:575–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Central pontine myelinosis and osmotic demyelination syndrome. Lambeck J, Hieber M, Dreßing A, Niesen WD. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116:600–606. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hyponatremia improvement is associated with a reduced risk of mortality: evidence from a meta-analysis. Corona G, Giuliani C, Verbalis JG, Forti G, Maggi M, Peri A. PLoS One. 2015;10:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prevalence, incidence and etiology of hyponatremia in elderly patients with fragility fractures. Cumming K, Hoyle GE, Hutchison JD, Soiza RL. PLoS One. 2014;9:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Incidence and risk factors of overcorrection in patients presenting with severe hyponatremia to the emergency department. Sumi H, Imai N, Shibagaki Y. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2022;26:1086–1091. doi: 10.1007/s10157-022-02252-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clinical analysis of hyponatremia in emergency patients. Lee BG, Yum KI, Moon JM, et al. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/wpr-97137 J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2003;14:50–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hyponatremia upon presentation to the emergency department - the need for urgent neuroimaging studies. Bokemeyer A, Dziewas R, Wiendl H, Schwindt W, Bicsán P, Kümpers P, Pavenstädt H. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1953. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02030-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clinical profile of patients admitted with hyponatremia in the medical intensive care unit. Babaliche P, Madnani S, Kamat S. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017;21:819–824. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_257_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Profile of hyponatremia in a tertiary care centre in North India. Mittal M, Deepshikha Deepshikha, Khurana H. Int J Adv Med. 2016;3:1011–1015. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clinico-etiological profile of hyponatremia among elderly patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Kaspa C, Govindu AS. https://www.ijcmr.com/uploads/7/7/4/6/77464738/ijcmr_2978_v1.pdf Guntur Int J Contemp Med Res. 2020;7:0–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Prevalence of hyponatremia among older inpatients in a general hospital. Zhang X, Li XY. Eur Geriatr Med. 2020;11:685–692. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00320-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Incidence of hyponatraemia in the emergency unit. Prkačin I, Martinović VĆ, Dobrota VĐ, Legović A, Vrhovec B, Cavrić G, Dražić P. Signa Vitae. 2015;10:29–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diagnostic workup and outcome in patients with profound hyponatremia. Isaak J, Boesing M, Potasso L, Lenherr C, Luethi-Corridori G, Leuppi JD, Leuppi-Taegtmeyer AB. J Clin Med. 2023;12:3567. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Outcome of hyponatremia in critically ill patients. Singh B, Mod U, Shah M, Jarwani B, Thakor A. https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijabms/article/view/1056 Indian J Appl Basic Med Sci. 2020;22:22–32. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES