Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2024 Jun 19;11(6):rsos.231782. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231782

Revisiting Stygocapitella (Annelida, Parergodrilidae) in Japan, with insights into their amphi-Pacific diversification

Natsumi Hookabe 1,, Naoto Jimi 2,3, Shinta Fujimoto 4, Hiroshi Kajihara 5
PMCID: PMC11296015  PMID: 39100149

Abstract

Polychaetes are typically found in marine environments with limited species adapting to semi-terrestrial habitats. The genus Stygocapitella comprises interstitial polychaetes dwelling in sandy beach areas around or above the high-water line. Based on molecular data, previous studies suggested the presence of multiple cryptic species in some different localities in the world lumped together as Stygocapitella subterranea. In Japan, reports on Stygocapitella were scarce, with only one species having been documented 40 years ago at Ishikari Beach in Hokkaido by the name of S. subterranea. We revisited these earlier findings and uncovered the presence of two distinct species in Stygocapitella. One of these species is herein named Stygocapitella itoi sp. nov., while the other corresponds to S. budaevae, originally described from the Russian Far East. Stygocapitella itoi sp. nov. possesses a chaetal pattern similar to that of S. australis, S. furcata and S. pacifica but can be distinguished from the congeners by two characters: a slightly forked pygidium and forked chaetae consisting of two teeth and two outer prongs. Our multi-locus phylogenetic analysis showed close relationships across the Pacific Ocean in two separated lineages in the genus, suggesting ancient dispersal or allopatric speciation after vicariance events.

Keywords: ghost worm, interstitial, marine invertebrates, meiobenthos, polychaetes

1. Introduction

Polychaetes are a diverse group of annelid worms that can be found in a wide range of marine ecosystems, encompassing approximately 11 500 species from the world [1]. While the majority of these species are adapted to aquatic environments, there are a few terrestrial species. One of the terrestrial annelid families, Parergodrilidae Reisinger, 1925, comprises two genera: Parergodrilus Reisinger, 1925 and Stygocapitella Knöllner, 1934. Parergodrilus is monotypic, with a single species, P. heideri [2], rarely found in leaf litter [3]. Stygocapitella, encompassing 11 species, are typically semi-terrestrial and found in the supralittoral zone of sandy beaches [46]. Their habitat typically extends vertically from the surface layer to a depth of approximately 1 m, with a preference for sediments that are not excessively wet [7,8]. Species in Stygocapitella are characterized by the presence of long, whip-like chaetae in their first chaetiger, but they lack head appendages and parapodia. They are generally slow-moving to the extent that Itô [9] noted that it can be challenging to determine whether they are alive or deceased upon examination.

Before 2017, the genus Stygocapitella was represented by a single cosmopolitan species, S. subterranea [10], reported from the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, both coastlines of the Atlantic Ocean and the West Pacific Ocean [8,1113]. This supposedly wide distribution led Giere [5] to assume the existence of multiple cryptic species under the name of S. subterranea. Meanwhile, Struck et al. [6] designated a neotype for S. subterrranea, and described two species, S. australis [6] and S. minuta [6], from Australia and South Africa, respectively. Subsequently, eight species were described based on morphological and molecular data collected worldwide [4].

In this study, we found two distinct species of Stygocapitella at Ishikari Beach, where ‘S. subterranea’ was previously reported [11,14]. Based on our morphological examination using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), one of the two species turned out to be new to science. Furthermore, we reconstruct the phylogeny of the genus using a concatenated dataset of multiple genes. The phylogenetic positions of the two Japanese species provide us insights into amphi-Pacific diversification within Stygocapitella.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Sampling and morphological observation

All specimens were collected at Ishikari Beach and Furen Lake, Hokkaido, northern Japan, in March and September 2019 (figure 1a,b ). Pits about 105–180 cm deep were dug with a shovel on the dune, where the groundwater table was about 2 m in depth (figure 1c ). Specimens were found from pits about 6.5–30 m away from the water line. Sediment samples were scooped at 15–20 cm intervals from the bottom to a depth of 100 cm, brought back to the laboratory, and agitated in tap water to extract animals by freshwater shock. The suspended water was passed through a 250 µm mesh hand net, and the residue was subsequently transferred into seawater. Worms were picked up under a Nikon SMZ 1500 dissecting microscope and photographed with a Nikon D5200 digital camera. For each specimen, the chaetal pattern and the genital organ (therefore, the sex) were examined following Struck et al. [6] under an Olympus BX51 compound light microscope with a Nomarski differential interference contrast device before fixation. Specimens for molecular studies were preserved in 99% ethanol. For morphological observation under SEM, specimens were anaesthetized with a MgCl2 solution isotonic to seawater and then fixed in 10% seawater-buffered formalin.

Figure 1.

Collection localities of specimens examined in the present study.

Collection localities of specimens examined in the present study. (a) Map showing the collection site of the specimens examined in the present study. (b) Lands of the collection site at Ishikari Beach. (c) Image of sampling specimens, Ishikari Beach.

For SEM, specimens fixed in 10% seawater-buffered formalin were dehydrated in an ethanol series, critical-point dried in a Hitachi HCP-1, mounted on an aluminium stub, coated with gold in a JEOL JFC-1100 and then examined with a Hitachi S-3000N scanning electron microscope at 15–30 kV accelerating voltage. Type and voucher specimens have been deposited in the National Museum of Science and Technology, Tsukuba (NSMT), Japan.

2.2. DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen). DNA fragments were amplified using the primer pairs polyHCO/LCO [15] for partial sequences of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI), 16Sar-L/16br-H [16] for 16S rRNA (16S), Stygo_ITS1_F and Stygo_ITS1_R [4] for the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1) and 1F/9R [17] for 18SrRNA (18S) by an Applied Systems 2720 thermal cycler with a preheating at 94°C for 2 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50–52°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 60 s; then a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Nucleotide sequencing was performed using the same primer pairs as for the initial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and internal primers, 3F/5R [17] and 18Sbi/S2.0 [18] for 18S with an ABI BigDye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit and an ABI 3100 Avant Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). We determined COI and 16S for all specimens and 18S and ITS1 for two specimens. Sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank.

2.3. Phylogenetic analyses

Newly generated sequences were combined with sequences available in GenBank (table 1), and aligned by MAFFT v. 7, employing auto-selected strategy in Geneious Prime v. 2023.2.1 (http://www.geneious.com/). Ambiguous sites were removed using Gblocks v. 0.91b [22], which resulted in COI (596 bp), 16S (418 bp), 18S (1758 bp) and ITS1 (667 bp). To infer the phylogenetic positions of the species examined in this study, maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using the IQ-TREE software [23]. Best-fit partition models were selected using the IQ-TREE web server [24] as follows: TIM2+F+G4 for the first codon position of COI, TIM3e+G4 for the second codon position of COI, TIM+F+I for the third codon position of COI, TN+F+G4 for 16S, TNe+G4 for 18S and TN+F+I for ITS1. Nodal support values were derived from 1000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot) [23].

Table 1.

List of species used for phylogenetic analyses in this study with GenBank accession numbers.

species COI 16S 18S ITS1 sources
Leitoscoloplos bifurcatus KR781456 KR349351 KR778793 Zhadan et al. [19]
Leitoscoloplos fragilis FJ612498 AY532341 AY532360 Bleidorn [20]; Bleidorn et al. [21]
Stygocapitella americae_432_10 MN158597 MN164068 MN162914 MN162724 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella americae_433_01 MN158590 MN164069 MN162917 MN162720 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella australis 392_05 KY503045 KY503077 Struck et al. [6]
Stygocapitella australis 393_01 KY503048 KY503078 Struck et al. [6]
Stygocapitella berniei_430_01 MN158602 MN164081 MN162921 MN162726 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella berniei_430_05 MN158605 MN164084 MN162924 MN162729 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella budaevae (Furen Lake) LC484888 LC484889 Present study
Stygocapitella budaevae (Ishikari Beach) LC484884 LC484890 LC484886 Present study
Stygocapitella budaevae_442_20 MN158381 MN164054 MN162903 MN162746 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella budaevae_442_22 MN158377 MN164059 MN162906 MN162743 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella budaevae_442_6 MN158374 MN164060 MN162912 MN162744 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella furcata_432_03 MN158612 MN164343 MN162996 MN162886 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella furcata_432_05 MN158613 MN164345 MN162997 MN162887 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella furcata_432_06 MN158614 MN164344 MN162998 MN162888 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella itoi sp. nov. (Furen Lake) LC484891 LC484892 LC484893 Present study
Stygocapitella itoi sp. nov. (Ishikari Beach) LC484885 LC484894 LC484887 LC484895 Present study
Stygocapitella josemariobrancoi_169_09 MN158424 MN164165 MN162973 MN162839 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella josemariobrancoi_169_10 MN158392 MN164174 MN162974 MN162825 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella josemariobrancoi_169_58 MN158417 MN164164 MN162976 MN162813 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella josemariobrancoi_222_04 MN158416 MN164142 MN162984 MN162811 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella josemariobrancoi_421_01 MN158471 MN164224 MN162964 MN162852 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella josemariobrancoi_422_01 MN158387 MN164135 MN162970 MN162799 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella josemariobrancoi_422_02 MN158399 MN164136 MN162971 MN162803 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella josemariobrancoi_429_08 MN158429 MN164185 MN162967 MN162851 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella minuta_391_17 KY503065 KY503075 Struck et al. [6]
Stygocapitella minuta_391_18 KY503066 KY503076 Struck et al. [6]
Stygocapitella pacifica_442_10 MN158611 MN164341 MN162994 MN162889 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella pacifica_442_11 MN164342 MN162995 MN162890 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella sp._432_02 MN158382 MN164061 MN162897 MN162736 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella sp._432_07 MN158385 MN164063 MN162909 MN162739 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_227_01 MN158519 MN164285 MN162935 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_320_06 MN158526 MN164298 MN162926 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_320_07 MN158540 MN164315 MN162927 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_321_01 MN158538 MN164300 MN162929 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_321_02 MN158539 MN164301 MN162952 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_396_04 KY503070 MN164327 MN162938 MN162761 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_396_05 KY503071 MN164313 MN162962 MN162760 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_403_03 MN158508 MN164265 MN162950 MN162762 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella subterranea_403_04 MN158567 MN164266 MN162942 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella westheidei_426_01 MN158481 MN164233 MN162928 MN162768 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella westheidei_427_01 MN158484 MN164259 MN162943 MN162781 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella westheidei_428_01 MN158491 MN164263 MN162946 MN162791 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella westheidei_428_02 MN158498 MN164247 MN162969 MN162790 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella westheidei_428_03 MN158488 MN164248 MN162947 MN162769 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella zecai_324_04 MN158587 MN164131 MN162992 MN162876 Cerca et al. [4]
Stygocapitella zecai_440_01 MN158588 MN164092 MN162986 MN162872 Cerca et al. [4]

Uncorrected pairwise genetic distances were calculated based on 657 bp of COI by MEGA v. 7 [25].

3. Results

3.1. Taxonomy

Family Parergodrilidae Reisinger, 1925

Genus Stygocapitella Knöllner, 1934

[Japanese name: Sunaito-gokai]

Type species. Stygocapitella subterranea Knöllner, 1934

Stygocapitella budaevae Cerca, Meyer, Purschke & Struck, 2020

[New Japanese name: Kita-sunaito-gokai]

Figure 2a,h

Figure 2.

Stygocapitella budaevae, female (NSMT ###2).

Stygocapitella budaevae, female (NSMT ###2). (a) Whole body, ventral view; Roman numerals represent the chaetigers. (b) Magnification of anterior end, ventrolateral view. (c) Chaetiger 1. (d) Chaetiger 2. (e) Chaetiger 3; asterisks mark whip-like bilimbate chaetae, black arrowheads mark bilimbate chaetae, and white arrowheads mark forked chaetae. (f) Magnification of forked chaetae; black arrowheads mark teeth of forked chaetae. (g) Oocytes. (h) Posterior end showing slightly forked pygidium; arrowheads point to the anal slit on pygidium. (a–f), (h) SEM images. (g) Microphotograph taken under light microscopy. Abbreviations: pe, peristomium; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium. Scale bars: (a) 100 µm, (b) 50 µm, (c–e) 5 µm, (f) 1 µm, (g, h) 25 µm.

3.1.1. Material examined

Five specimens were collected at 27 m inland from a high water line, Ishikari Beach, Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan (43°14.8283′ N, 141°20.8683′ E). NMST-Pol 113496, female, preserved in formalin, 120 cm depth, on 5 March 2019. NMST-Pol 113497, female, Au-coated and mounted on a SEM stub, 120 cm depth, on 5 March 2019. NMST-Pol 113498, female, preserved in formalin, 120 cm depth, on 6 March 2019; NMST-Pol 113499, male, preserved in formalin, 130 cm depth, on 7 March 2019; NMST-Pol 113500, male, preserved in 99% EtOH, 150 cm depth, on 19 March 2019. Two specimens were collected at 6 m inland from a high water line, Furen Lake, Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan (43°17'54.9" N, 145°23'07.7" E). NMST-Pol 113501, male, preserved in 10% formalin, 130 cm depth, on 13 September 2019. NMST-Pol 113502, male, preserved in 10% formalin, 130 cm depth, on 13 September 2019.

3.1.2. Description

Body 0.9–1.0 mm in length, 100 µm in width; whitish and translucent in life. Prostomium broadly rounded, without appendages; peristomium followed by 1 achaetiger + 10 chaetigers + 2 achaetigers (= 13 segments) (figure 2a,b ). Chaetiger 1 bearing two whip-like bilimbate, two bilimbate and two forked chaetae (figure 2c ). Chaetiger 2 possessing four bilimbate and two forked chaetae (figure 2d ), remaining 3–10 chaetigers with two bilimbate and two forked chaetae (figure 2e ). Forked chaetae comprise two regular teeth between the outer prongs (figure 2f ). Male with paired spermioducts opening ventrally in chaetiger 9. Female with genital pores at ventral boundary between chaetigers 9 and 10, and possessing one–two oocytes (20–75 µm in length) (figure 2g ). Pygidium slightly forked (figure 2h ).

3.1.3. Remarks

The chaetal pattern of chaetiger 1 (two whip-like bilimbate, two bilimbate and two forked chaetae) and the chaetal pattern of chaetiger 2 (four bilimbate and two forked chaetae) agree with the morphology of S. budaevae Cerca et al. [4].

3.1.4. Distribution and habitat

The species is known from Volchanets, Primorsky Krai region, Russia and Ishikari Beach and Furen Lake, Hokkaido, Japan; beach with medium-sized sand grains at or above the higher water [4].

Stygocapitella itoi sp. nov.

[New Japanese name: Ito-sunaito-gokai]

(figure 3ag )

Figure 3.

Stygocapitella itoi sp. nov., male, paratype (NSMT ###9), SEM images.

Stygocapitella itoi sp. nov., male, paratype (NSMT ###9), SEM images. (a) Whole body, ventral view; Roman numerals represent the chaetigers. (b) Magnification of anterior end, ventral view. (c) Chaetiger 1. (d) Chaetiger 2. (e) Chaetiger 3; asterisks mark whip-like bilimbate chaetae; black arrowheads mark bilimbate chaetae, and white arrowheads mark forked chaetae. (f) Magnification of forked chaetae; white arrowheads mark teeth of forked chaetae. (g) Posterior end showing slightly forked pygidium; arrow heads point to anal slit on pygidium. Abbreviations: pe, peristomium; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium. Scale bars: (a, b) 100 µm, (c–e) 5 µm, (f) 1 µm, (g) 25 µm.

3.1.5. Type materials

Two type specimens, all collected at 27 m inland from the high water line, Ishikari Beach, Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan (43°14.8283′ N, 141°20.8683′ E). Holotype: NMST-Pol H-926, male, preserved in 99% ethanol, 140 cm depth, on 6 March 2019. Paratype: NMST-Pol P-927, male, Au-coated and mounted on a SEM stub, 140 cm depth, on 6 March 2019.

3.1.6. Additional materials

One female specimen was used for DNA extraction, 150 cm depth at the same locality as type materials, on 7 March 2019. One male specimen collected at Furen Lake (43°17'54.9" N, 145°23'07.7" E), 105 cm depth on 13 September 2019, was used for DNA extraction.

3.1.7. Description

Body 0.9–1.2 mm in length, 100 µm in width, whitish and translucent in life. Prostomium broadly rounded, without appendages; peristomium followed by 1 achaetiger + 10 chaetigers + 2 achaetigers (=13 segments) (figure 3a,b ). Chaetiger 1 was equipped with two whip-like bilimbate, one bilimbate and two forked chaetae (figure 3c ). Chaetigers 2–10 bearing two bilimbate and two forked chaetae (figure 3d,e ). Forked chaetae comprise two regular teeth between the outer prongs (figure 3f ). Male with paired spermioducts opening ventrally in chaetiger 9. Female with genital pores at ventral boundary between chaetigers 9 and 10, oocytes not recognized. Pygidium slightly forked (figure 3g ).

3.1.8. Remarks

Stygocapitella itoi sp. nov. possesses the same chaetal pattern as S. australis, S. furcata [4] and S. pacifica [4] but is distinguishable from the last three by: (i) having a slightly forked pygidium and (ii) having forked chaetae that comprise two teeth and two outer prongs.

3.1.9. Etymology

The new species is named in honour of Dr Tatsunori Itô (1945–1990), who greatly contributed to Japanese meiobenthology through a handbook for the general public, Organisms in Sand Interstices [9].

3.1.10. Distribution and habitat

The species is known from Ishikari Beach and Furen Lake, Hokkaido; dunes of sea-coast, moist sand.

3.2. Phylogeny and genetic distances

In the resulting tree, two specimens of S. budaevae collected from Hokkaido, Japan, formed a clade with specimens from Volchanets, Russia (UFBoot = 92%) (figure 4). The S. budaevae clade was found to be sister-related with a clade comprising unidentified species from San Juan Island, USA (Stygocapitella sp._432_02 and Stygocapitella sp._432_07); this relationship was fully supported (figure 4).

Figure 4.

A maximum-likelihood tree of the genus Stygocapitella based on concatenated sequences of COI

A maximum-likelihood tree of the genus Stygocapitella based on concatenated sequences of COI, 16S, 18S and ITS1. Numbers near nodes indicate UFBoot values generated by maximum-likelihood analysis with 1000 replicates in IQ-TREE. Solid circles represent full support values.

The newly described species, S. itoi sp. nov., was a sister taxon to S. furcata collected from San Juan Island, USA (UFBoot = 92%) (figure 4). This clade was then sister to S. pacifica from Volchanets, Russia (UFBoot = 90%)

The COI sequences of specimens from Ishikari Beach and Furen Lake were identical to each other within S. budaevae and S. itoi sp. nov., respectively. Interspecific genetic distances between Japanese and Russian specimens of S. budaevae were 0.12–3.09% in uncorrected p-distance, while it was 17.1% between S. furcata and S. itoi sp. nov.

4. Discussion

4.1. Revisiting taxonomy of Japanese Stygocapitella

In the present study, we identified two species of Stygocapitella in Hokkaido, Japan (figures 2 and 3), one of which was herein described as S. itoi sp. nov. Our morphological observations support that chaetal patterns are important for distinguishing species in Stygocapitella [4]. Furthermore, our study highlights that pygidium shape and the number of teeth in forked chaetae are useful for species distinction. Notably, these additional characteristics enabled the differentiation of S. itoi sp. nov. from its closely related species, S. furcata (figure 4). In addition to these morphological differences, S. itoi sp. nov. can be differentiated from S. furcata by COI genetic distances; the values were comparable with interspecific thresholds reported in Stygocapitella [4].

The present study represents a re-examination of the earlier reports by Ito [11] of S. subterranea from Ishikari Beach. Although we successfully obtained Stygocapitella specimens on the beach, we cannot determine whether [9,11] material represented S. budaevae, S. itoi sp. nov., or neither/both of these species because [9] lacks illustrations of essential characters for distinguishing different Stygocapitella species. Moreover, detailed information about the sampling site for [9,11] Stygocapitella specimens was not recorded in his work. According to additional notes found in [9], it is reasonable to infer that the sampling location was probably in the vicinity of Ishikari Bay New Port (constructed 1973–1982), approximately 5 km away from our study site. In light of recent global biogeographic analyses by Cerca et al. [4] and Itô [9,11], Stygocapitella specimens from Ishikari Beach are unlikely to be S. subterranea. European populations associated with the name S. subterranea are genetically isolated from West Pacific populations, as shown in Cerca et al. [4]. Consequently, the previous identification of these specimens as S. subterranea should be revised to accurately reflect their taxonomic status as S. budaevae, S. itoi sp. nov., or neither of the two species.

4.2. Amphi-Pacific diversification in Stygocapitella

Our phylogenetic analysis revealed closely related relationships on both sides of the Pacific Ocean, notably between S. budaevae and an unidentified species from San Juan Island (represented by Stygocapitella sp._432_02 and Stygocapitella sp._432_07), and between S. furcata and S. itoi sp. nov. (figure 4). These relationships correspond to the patterns previously inferred by Cerca et al. [4]. Such amphi-Pacific relationships, where closely related species are found on both sides of the Pacific Ocean, have been reported in various terrestrial organisms [26]. Common vicariance events are often suggested as contributing to the diversification of these species [27]. While the exact mechanisms of these dispersal events remain uncertain, particularly given the unclear dispersal capacity of Stygocapitella, our findings indicate the potential for ancient lineage dispersal across the Pacific Ocean or allopatric speciation following vicariance events in two separate lineages in Stygocapitella.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Yuki Higashida, Dr. Aoi Tsuyuki, and Mr. Naohiro Hasegawa for kindly supporting our field sampling at Ishikari Beach, and Dr. Takuma Sato for providing us a useful advice on molecular analyses.

Contributor Information

Natsumi Hookabe, Email: sofeechan312@gmail.com.

Naoto Jimi, Email: beniimo7010@gmail.com.

Shinta Fujimoto, Email: shinta.f@water-bears.com.

Hiroshi Kajihara, Email: kajihara@eis.hokudai.ac.jp.

Ethics

No permissions were required prior to conducting the present research.

Data accessibility

Genetic data can be obtained from Genbank (accession nos. LC484884–LC484894: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

Declaration of AI use

We have not used AI-assisted technologies in creating this article.

Authors’ contributions

N.H.: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, resources, writing–original draft, writing—review and editing. N.J.: investigation, methodology, resources, visualization, writing—review and editing. S.F.: funding acquisition, investigation, resources, writing—review and editing. H.K.: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing.

All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Conflict of interest declaration

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This study is partially supported by a grant-in-aid of the Mikimoto Fund for Marine Ecology, Japan to S.F. and JSPS KAKENHI (no. 21J14807) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to N.H.

References

  • 1. Pamungkas J, Glasby CJ, Read GB, Wilson SP, Costello MJ. 2019. Progress and perspectives in the discovery of polychaete worms (Annelida) of the world. Helgol. Mar. Res. 73 , 1–10. ( 10.1186/s10152-019-0524-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Reisinger E. 1925. Ein landbewohnender archiannelide. Zugleich ein beitrag zur systematik der archianneliden. Z. Morph. u. Okol. Tiere 3 , 197–254. ( 10.1007/BF00408145) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Schlaghamerský J, Frelich LE. 2012. First records of Parergodrilus heideri (Annelida: “Polychaeta”) from North America. Zootaxa 3498 , 81–86. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.3498.1.5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cerca J, Meyer C, Purschke G, Struck TH. 2020. Delimitation of cryptic species drastically reduces the geographical ranges of marine interstitial ghost-worms (Stygocapitella; Annelida, Sedentaria). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 143 , 106663. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106663) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Giere O. 2009. Meiobenthology – the microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Struck TH, Koczula J, Stateczny D, Meyer C, Purschke G. 2017. Two new species in the annelid genus Stygocapitella (Orbiniida, Parergodrilidae) with comments on their biogeography. Zootaxa 4286 , 301–332. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.4286.3.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Meca MA, Zhadan A, Struck TH. 2021. The early branching group of Orbiniida sensu Struck et al., 2015: Parergodrilidae and Orbiniidae. Diversity (Basel) 13 , 29. ( 10.3390/d13010029) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Purschke G. 1999. Terrestrial polychaetes—models for the evolution of the Clitellata (Annelida)? Hydrobiologia 406 , 87–99. ( 10.1023/A:1003780032497) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Itô T. 1985. Organisms in sand interstices. Tokyo, Japan: Kaimeisha. [in Japanese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Knöllner F. 1934. Stypocapitella [sic for Stygocapitella] subterranea nov. gen., nov. spec. Schr. Naturwiss. Ver. 20 , 468–472. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ito T. 1984. Studies on the interstitial animals in the Ishikari beach, Hokkaido, northern Japan—a preliminary report. Benthos Res. 1984 , 1–14. ( 10.5179/benthos1981.1984.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Westheide W. 1972. La faune des Polychètes et des Archiannélides dans les plages sableuses à ressac de la côte Mediterranéenne de la Tunisie. Bull. Inst. Natl. Sci. Tech. Oceanogr. Peche Salammbo. 2 , 449–468. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Westheide W. 2008. Polychaetes: interstitial families. Shrewsbury, UK: Field Studies Council. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yamanishi R. 1983. Preliminary report on the fauna of interstitial polychaetes (Annelida) of Japan. Benthos Res. 1983 , 41–48. ( 10.5179/benthos1970.1983.41) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Carr CM, Hardy SM, Brown TM, Macdonald TA, Hebert PDN. 2011. A tri-oceanic perspective: DNA barcoding reveals geographic structure and cryptic diversity in Canadian polychaetes. PLoS One 6 , e22232. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0022232) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Palumbi SR, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G. 1991. The simple fool’s guide to PCR, v. 2.0, p. 45. Honolulu, HI: Department Zoology, Kewalo Marine Laboratory, University of Hawaii. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Giribet G, Carranza S, Baguñà J, Riutort M, Ribera C. 1996. First molecular evidence for the existence of a Tardigrada + Arthropoda clade. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13 , 76–84. ( 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025573) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Whiting MF, Carpenter JM, Wheeler QD, Wheeler WC. 1997. The strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46 , 1–68. ( 10.1093/sysbio/46.1.1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhadan A, Stupnikova A, Neretina T. 2015. Orbiniidae (Annelida: Errantia) from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia with notes on orbiniid phylogeny. Zootaxa 4019 , 773–801. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.4019.1.27) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Bleidorn C. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Orbiniidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) based on molecular data. Zool. J. Linn. Soc 144 , 59–73. ( 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00160.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bleidorn C, Hill N, Erséus C, Tiedemann R. 2009. On the role of character loss in orbiniid phylogeny (Annelida): molecules vs. morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52 , 57–69. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.03.022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17 , 540–552. ( 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A. 2013. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 , 1188–1195. ( 10.1093/molbev/mst024) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32 , 268–274. ( 10.1093/molbev/msu300) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33 , 1870–1874. ( 10.1093/molbev/msw054) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Humphries CJ, Parenti LR. 1999. Cladistic biogeography: interpreting patterns of plant and animal distributions, 2nd edn. Oxford Biogeography Series. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ( 10.1093/oso/9780198548188.001.0001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. van den Ende C, White LT, van Welzen PC. 2017. The existence and break-up of the Antarctic land bridge as indicated by both amphi-Pacific distributions and tectonics. Gondwana Res. 44 , 219–227. ( 10.1016/j.gr.2016.12.006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Genetic data can be obtained from Genbank (accession nos. LC484884–LC484894: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES