Skip to main content
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research logoLink to Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research
. 2024 Jun 9;11(2):392–397. doi: 10.5455/javar.2024.k788

Prevalence and molecular analysis of Toxocara cati in Baghdad Province

Zaid Khalid Alani 1,2, May Hameed Kawan 2
PMCID: PMC11296162  PMID: 39101072

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to detect Toxocara cati in cats by microscopic and molecular analysis using PCR, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis.

Materials and Methods:

Randomly selected 200 cat feces samples were taken from various private veterinarian clinics in Baghdad. To identify eggs of T. cati by the flotation method, DNA from 100 cat feces was extracted, and one pair of ITS2 region-specific primers was used for polymerase chain reaction, followed by sequencing.

Results:

Toxocara cati infection rate was found to be 23 out of 100 fecal samples using PCR. Ten DNA product sequence data studies showed 98%–100% similarity to the 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene sequences found in the Gene Bank. The study incidence showed that the overall infection rate by microscopic examination was 23%, with no significant difference between stray cats (27%), and domestic cats (19%). After studying the effect of several epidemiological parameters on the infection rate, it was found that the infection rates of stray and domestic cats were higher in kittens under six months of age, at 46.1% and 27%, respectively, whereas rates were lower for the adult than six months was 11.5% of domestic cats and 14.7% of stray cats. The percentage of stray and domestic male cats that were registered was 35.5%, whereas the female cats registered were 20.6% and 17.5%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Cats are significant clinical reservoirs for zoonotic parasites. In Iraq, Baghdad has a high incidence of T. cati detections. Compared to conventional methods, PCR is thought to be a more sensitive, accurate diagnostic procedure that confirms the species’ identity.

Keywords: Toxocara cati, sequences, molecular, ITS2, zoonotic parasite

Introduction

The worldwide helminth parasite Toxocara spp. causes a variety of domestic, wild, and pet animals as final and paratenic hosts via a variety of ways of transmission, producing tough eggs that can withstand environmental conditions and long-lived larvae that inhabit tissues [1]. Pet animal intestines frequently contain the intestinal parasite Toxocara spp., especially in puppies and kittens, who are most vulnerable to parasitic diseases. These parasites’ ability to be spread by zoonotic agents increases the burden of disease and poses implications for public health. In fragile, impoverished communities in tropical and subtropical regions, where these animals roam freely, coexist with people, and are not dewormed, high prevalence rates have been reported [2]. Toxocariasis remains problematic worldwide as it causes systemic zoonotic infection in paratenic hosts like ruminants, persons, rabbits, poultry, and rodents [3]. The life cycle of this parasite occurs with the consumption of infectious eggs, which can be found in contaminated soil or the stools of infected cats. These eggs can hatch into adult worms that can reach a length of 10 cm, and the females can lay hundreds of thousands of eggs every day [4].

Toxocara cati is commonly detected in the gut of domestic cats worldwide, with differences in prevalence depending on geographical areas, laboratory procedures employed for diagnoses, and the structure of the tested feline population [5]. The ITS1 and ITS2 sections of rDNA can be used as genetic markers using polymerase chain reaction techniques for molecular systematic research of various parasite groups, and several studies used a PCR-based molecular technique based on the ITS sequence to differentiate Toxocara spp. eggs [6]. Infectious larvae can be generated by two capacities to release proteins (MUC-120) that support them to pass through the intestinal wall and then enter the intestinal tract and develop many tissues, including the lungs and liver [7]. The gastrointestinal helminths in the Ascaridia group can cause some clinical signs and make the eggs an environmental factor [8]. Contaminated water and food could be transferred by zoonotic agents, and there are extensive minor linkages with animal secretions [9]. In Iraq, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used as an accurate technique for the serodiagnosis of a large number of parasites in humans and animals [10]. However, in this study, T. cati was examined for the first time in Baghdad using DNA analysis, and a phylogenetic analysis was subsequently conducted.

Materials and Methods

Animals and sample collection

Two hundred fecal samples of cats were collected randomly from several private veterinary clinics in Baghdad. The samples were placed in plastic bags and refrigerated at 4°C until the processing was finished in a day. Using NaCl flotation techniques, Toxocara spp. eggs were examined under a microscope [11,12].

Flotation using saturation with a NaCl solution

A 50-ml saturated sodium chloride solution was utilized, along with one to two gm of fecal material. The liquid was filtered and divided into two test tubes after ten minutes, with a coverslip applied to the surface of every test tube. The coverslips were laced on the glass slides and observed under the microscope at 10× [10].

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Geneaid Biotech Ltd. designed the Presto™ Stool DNA extraction kit, which was used to isolate DNA from 100 cat feces. The DNA extraction produced nucleic acids whose concentrations ranged from 82.2 to 210.3 ng/µl. One pair of oligonucleotide primers specific for the ITS2 region (5.8S ribosomal RNA gene) of T. cati was used. The sequences of these primers were the forward (5’-TGG TGC ATT CTT TCG CAA CG-3’) and the reverse (5’-GCC GAT GAC GTT ACC TCC AA-3’) to amplify a region of 232-bp. A thermocycler (Techne/UK) was programmed to perform the PCR. The following circumstances were met when performing amplifications: 30 cycles of initial denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 58°C for 30 sec, polymerase extension at 72°C for 30 sec, and a final cycle at 72°C for 10 min were performed. Then, 10 µl of each amplified sample mixed with loading buffer was loaded into the wells made in the 1.5% agarose gel, to which 3 µl/100 ml of ethidium bromide was added. The electrophoresis was run at 80 V for 1 h, and a DNA size marker was also loaded [4]. Products were visualized using a UV transilluminator (Vilber Lourmal/EEC) and photographed with a digital camera; positive results were determined when the sample DNA band had a size approximately similar to the desired product size. PCR water (4.5 µl), master mix (12.5 μl), forward primer (1.5 µl), reverse primer (1.5 µl), and 5 µl of template DNA were added to a 25 μl total volume mix for the PCR.

Statistical analysis

The experiment’s data were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, version 20.1). The study employed a two-way analysis of variance and the least significant differences post hoc test to evaluate any significant differences between the group means. The findings were presented as mean ± standard errors, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05 [13].

Results

Detection of Toxocara spp. using a microscopic technique

Under 40× magnification, the eggs appeared round to ovoid, with a thick pitted wall and a total mean size ranging from 65 to 75 μm (Fig. 1). The total rate of infection in domestic and stray cats was 23% (46/200), with a non-significant difference (Table 1). Regarding the sex of the animals and age groups, the results of the investigation showed that there was no significant difference between domestic and stray cats (Tables 2 and 3). According to the survey study, the infection rate of Toxocara spp. during the months. The highest rate of infection was 66.6% (6/9) in stray cats, and in domestic cats, it was 71.4% (5/7) during July 2022. However, June 2022, February 2023, and April 2023 did not report any infections in domestic cats compared with November 2022, January 2023, and April 2023 in stray cats, where no infections were observed.

Figure 1. Toxocara spp. undeveloped eggs (40x).

Figure 1.

Table 1. Total rate of Toxocara spp. infection in domestic and stray cats by microscopic examination.

Percentage (%) Positive samples Samples examined Animals
19.00 19 100 Domestic cats
27.00 27 100 Stray cats
23 46 200 Total
1.391 NS
(0.238)
--- --- Chi-Square (χ2)
(p value)

NS: non-significant.

Table 2. Prevalence of Toxocara spp. in domestic and stray cats according to the age groups.

Ages Stray cats Domestic cats
Samples examined Positive samples % Samples examined Positive samples %
Kitten (<6 months) 39 18 46.1 48 13 27
Adults (>6 months) 61 9 14.7 52 6 11.5
Total 100 27 27 100 19 19

Chi-Square χ2 0.016 p value 0.901

Figure 3. Dendrogram obtained for T. cati isolates/genotypes based on the ITS2 region of the 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene sequence by the maximum likelihood analysis at showing the phylogenetic tree of Iraq isolates with related Global strains.

Figure 3.

Table 3. Prevalence of Toxocara spp. in domestic and stray cats according the sex.

Sexes Stray cats Domestic cats
No. of samples examined No. of positive samples % No. of samples examined No. of positive samples %
Male 42 15 35.7 57 10 17.5
Female 58 12 20.6 43 9 20.9
Total 100 27 27 100 19 19

Chi-Square (χ2) 0.038 p value 0.845

Detection of T. cati using the PCR technique

The results of DNA amplification by PCR showed that 23% (23/100) of the tested samples were positive. The PCR products were as expected, roughly 232 bp in length (Fig. 2). PCR was employed to examine samples taken from fecal cats randomly. All DNA samples were exposed to conventional PCR procedures for the recognition of T. cati. Using purified T. cati egg DNA (1.7 to 1.9), a conventional PCR was conducted using one pair of unique oligonucleotide primers that were freshly created for each ITS2 region of T. cati. The NanoDrop spectrophotometer was utilized for this process.

Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis image shows the PCR product analysis of 232-bp of the conserved region of the 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene of T. cati from cat feces samples. Lanes 1 to 14 positive.

Figure 2.

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic tree analysis

In this study, 10 PCR products of the partially amplified ribosomal DNA gene of T. cati ITS-2 region were submitted for sequencing by Bioneer Company Korea. Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer, bidirectional Sanger sequencing was accomplished (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) (Table 4). All of the sequences obtained were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) for registration. The basic Local Alignment Search Tool was used to compare these sequences with other comparable sequences that had been uploaded to the GenBank database. Finally, the phylogenetic tree was constructed to include T. cati isolates from Iraq with other isolates obtained from other countries based on the above gene sequence (Fig. 3).

Table 4. Homology percentages between the T. cati of the local isolates compared with related sequences provided by NCBI.

T. cati Isolate No. GenBank accession numbers Identity % International GenBank accession numbers Country
T1 OR619698.1 100 MW144961.1 France
2 OR619699.1 100 MW144961.1 France
3 OR619700.1 99 KJ777157.1 India
4 OR619699.1 100 KY003082.1 Chine
5 OR619702.1 100 KT873462.1 Kyrgyzstan
6 OR619703.1 100 LC762620.1 Germany
7 OR619704.1 100 LC700102.1 Iran
8 OR619705.1 99 LC762618.1 Germany
9 OR619706.1 98 MH043956.1 Turkey
10 OR619707.1 100 LC762618.1 Germany

Discussion

The incidence of intestinal helminths in cats, both stray and domestic, by microscopic examination was 23% (46/200). The results are consistent with another study, which recorded an infection rate of 25% with T. cati in Brazil [14]. The current study’s total infection rate was higher than what was previously documented in Mexico, which recorded 42.5% by flotation technique, and it was reported that 62.5% of Turkish have T. cati. [15,16]. In Estonia, 48.2% of cats were infected with T. cati; this rate was higher than the studies conducted in the neighboring country, Iran, where 42.6% were infected [17,18].

In Russia, 16.7% of cats were infected with T. cati, whereas other studies found that 52% of cats were infected [19,20]. The result of this study is lower than that in Mosul; it was 40% [21]. The percentage of infection was 12.9% in Baghdad by direct and flotation methods [9]. The prevalence rate of T. cati in this study was 23%, which disagrees with another study that recorded a 39.58% rate of infection with T. cati in fresh fecal specimens by flotation methods in Kirkuk City [22]. Last year in Sulaimani city, a total prevalence of 28.2% (22/78) with T. cati was reported by direct fecal smear and fecal floatation procedures [12]. The parasite may reactivate during pregnancy and pass through the placenta or breastfeed the fetus before or after delivery, which can affect the prevalence of the parasite [23]. Based on the age groups, kittens under six months of age recorded 46.1% (18/39) and 27% (13/48) rates of infection in stray and domestic cats, respectively. This result is higher than the study in Western Australia, which recorded the highest parasite prevalence of 34.3% in kittens [24]. An additional study in Portugal showed that the prevalence rate was comparable in kittens and adult cats, where the infection rate was 11.8% [25].

The overall prevalence rate of T. cati according to age groups was lower than a study conducted in Iran, which registered a 30% rate in cats over two years of age [26]. Regarding the sex of the animal, the present study revealed that there was no significant difference between stray and domestic cats, sex seemed to not affect the prevalence of the parasite, and the only effect of neutering was on the occurrence of ascarid infection [27]. The molecular study of cats examined revealed the presence of T. cati DNA, and the overall infection rate was 23% (23/100), which is relatively compared with the prevalence encountered in a disagreement with another study in Switzerland, which recorded 31.5%. T. cati was identified by PCR, and in Isfahan city, it was recorded at 17.7% [28,29].

According to a different study, 40% of T. cati cases were identified by PCR analysis using the mitochondrial DNA (mt) NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 gene (nad1). Variations among various research results may arise from differences in the results when addressing the terms prevalence, size or number of samples, sampling methodologies, nature of samples as coprological or necropsy, other epidemiological variables, statistical analysis, the use of different PCR techniques, and different DNA extraction techniques. Furthermore, DNA extraction procedures to extract T. cati genomic DNA include crushing, grinding, boiling, freeze-thawing, and application of kits [30]. The findings disagreed with those of another study, which indicated 30% were from the Himalayan breed and 32% were from the Shirazi breed. It is also important to remember that a variety of conditions may impede the parasite’s eggs from being discharged in their typical form. These include sporadic excretion in the presence of evident infections and a protracted time during which the eggs do not go through embryonic development [4].

In this study, 10 PCR products had 100% similarity to the sequences of the ITS-2 region of the ribosomal DNA of T. cati data available in GenBank. In another study, various mitochondrial and nuclear genes were applied using a DNA-based method to amplify ITS-2, a valid region to distinguish Toxascaris leonina from T. cati [31]. Species differences within Iranian helminths isolates of T. cati, T. canis, and T. leonina were roughly 2.0%, 1.7%, and 2.6% for pnad1, 2.3%, 1.3%, and 1.0% for the pcox1 gene [32].

Conclusion

Cats are significant clinical reservoirs for zoonotic parasites. In Iraq, Baghdad has a high incidence of T. cati detections. Compared to conventional methods, PCR is thought to be a more sensitive, accurate diagnostic procedure that confirms species identity.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Baghdad, College of Veterinary Medicine, and College of Health Medical Techniques, Al-Bayan University, as well as the field technicians who have helped with the study.

List of Abbreviations

µl, microliter; ANOVA, analysis of variance; BLAST, basic local alignment search tool; bp, Base pair; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ITS2, internal transcribed spacer 2; LSD, least significant differences; MUC-120, mucin; NaCl, Sodium chloride; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; ng/µl, nanograms per microliter; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RNA, ribonucleic acid; T. cati, Toxocara cati; UV, ultraviolet light; V, voltage.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest, according to the authors.

Author contributions

Zaid Khalid Alani is responsible for ensuring that the descriptions are accurate and for conducting research and writing papers. The first author did all the microscopic and molecular detection after collecting the samples and was in charge of processing the research data. May Hameed Kawan had a role in developing the plan, arranging the article, conducting statistical analysis, and editing the manuscript.

References

  • [1].Holland CV. A walk on the wild side: a review of the epidemiology of Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati in wild hosts. Int J Parasitol. 2023;26:216–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.10.008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Chan JM, Chan H, Flores MJ. Domesticated cats as a source of environmental contamination with Toxocara cati and other soil-transmitted helminth eggs in urban area, Manila-Philiphines. J Public Health. 2023;4(1):1022. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.iphj.2023.4.1.9288. [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Hade BF, Zainab AM, Ibrahim I, Saadedin SM. Histopathological study of different vlm stages of Toxocara canis infection in liver of rabbits. IJB. 2018;17(2):47–56. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Alshawi AF, Alhayani OJ. Molecular detection and prevalence of the Toxocara cati parasite in household cats breeds in the Al-Anbar province-Iraq. Egypt J Vet Sci. 2024;55(6):1627–36. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejvs.2024.263951.1791. [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Ursache AL, Györke A, Mircean V, Dumitrache MO, Codea AR, Cozma V. Toxocara cati and other parasitic enteropathogens: more commonly found in owned cats with gastrointestinal signs than in clinically healthy ones. J Pathog. 2021;10(2):198. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020198. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Farhan BA, Ali MJ. Prevalence of Toxocara cati infection and molecular characterization in domestic and stray cats in the Karbala Province, Iraq. Rom J Diabetes Nutr Metab Dis. 2024;31(1):258–67. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Hade BF. Molecular sequancing and phylogenic analysis to virulence nmuc-1 gene in visceral larvae migrance. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2020;51(3):894–902. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v51i3.1044. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Faraj AA, Hade BF, Al-Amery AM. Conventional and molecular study of Babesia spp. of natural infection in dragging horses at some areas of Baghdad city, Iraq. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2019;50(3):909–15. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v50i3.707. [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Hadi AM, Faraj AA. Role of domestic cats Felis catus as reservoir hosts of internal parasites and protozoa in Baghdad. Bull Iraq Nat Hist Mus. 2014;13(1):89–94. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Lamy SAQ, Kawan MH. Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in quail birds (Coturnix coturnix) in Baghdad City, Iraq. Int J Health Sci. 2022;6(S1):10377–87. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7490. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Kareem SM, Kawan MH. Traditional diagnosis of Eimeria spp. in fallow deer at middle parts of Iraq. Iraqi J Vet Med. 2020;44(E0):94–9. https://doi.org/10.30539/ijvm.v44i(E0).1028. [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Rashid ZM, Aziz SA, Ali OJ, Kakarash NK, Marif HFF. Coprological detection of Toxocariosis in domicile and stray dogs and cats in Sulaimani province. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2022;36(4):1047–51. https://doi.org/10.33899/ijvs.2022.132976.2157. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Barton B, Peat J. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. Medical statistics: a guide to SPSS, data analysis and critical appraisal. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Labarthe N, Serrão ML, Ferreira AMR, Almeida NK, Guerrero J. A survey of gastrointestinal helminths in cats of the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro. Brazil Vet Parasitol. 2004;123(1–2):133–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Martínez-Barbabosa I, Tsuji OV, Cabello RR, Cárdenas EMG, Chasin OA. The prevalence of Toxocara cati in domestic cats in Mexico city. Vet Parasitol. 2003;114(1):43–9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(03)00038-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00038-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Yaman M, Ayaz E, Gül A, Muz MN. Investigation of helminth infections of cats and dogs in the Hatay province. Turk Parazitol Derg. 2006;30(3):200–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Talvik H, Moks E, Mägi E, Järvis T, Miller I. Distribution of Toxocara infection in the environment and in definitive and paratenic hosts in Estonia. Acta Vet Hung. 2006;54(3):399–406. doi: 10.1556/AVet.54.2006.3.10. https://doi.org/10.1556/avet.54.2006.3.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Zibaei M, Sadjjadi SM. Trend of toxocariasis in Iran: a review on human and animal dimensions. Iran J Vet Res. 2017;18(4):233. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Dantas-Torres F. Toxocara prevalence in dogs and cats in Brazil. Adv Parasitol. 2002;109:715–41. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.028. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Lukashev AN, Ruzina MN, Akhmadishina LV. Toxocara prevalence in dogs, cats and the environment in Russia. Adv Parasitol. 2020;109:801–17. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.019. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Al-Obaidi QT. Prevalence of internal helminthes in stray cats (Felis catus) in Mosul city, Mosul-Iraq. J Anim Vet Adv. 2012;11(15):2732–6. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2012.2732.2736. [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Hassan HF, Barzinji AKRA. Epidemiological survey on stray dogs and cats gastro-intestinal parasites in Kirkuk province, Iraq. Kirkuk J Sci. 2018;13(1):228–38. https://doi.org/10.32894/kujss.2018.143035. [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Krecek RC, Moura L, Lucas H, Kelly P. Parasites of stray cats (Felis domesticus L., 1758) on St. Kitts, West Indies. Vet Parasitol. 2010;172(1–2):147–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].McGlade TR, Robertson ID, Elliot AD, Read C, Thompson RCA. Gastrointestinal parasites of domestic cats in Perth, Western Australia. Vet Parasitol. 2003;117(4):251–62. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.08.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Duarte A, Castro I, da Fonseca IMP, Almeida V, de Carvalho LMM, Meireles J, et al. Survey of infectious and parasitic diseases in stray cats at the Lisbon metropolitan area, Portugal. J Feline Med Surg. 2010;12(6):441–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2009.11.003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hajipour N. A survey on the prevalence of Toxocara cati, Toxocara canis and Toxascaris leonina eggs in stray dogs and cats’ faeces in Northwest of Iran: a potential risk for human health. Trop Biomed. 2019;36(1):143–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Arbabi M, Hooshyar H. Gastrointestinal parasites of stray cats in Kashan, Iran. Trop Biomed. 2009;26(1):16–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Fahrion AS, Schnyder M, Wichert B, Deplazes P. Toxocara eggs shed by dogs and cats and their molecular and morphometric species-specific identification: Is the finding of T. cati eggs shed by dogs of epidemiological relevance. Vet Parasitol. 2011;177(1–2):186–89. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Torkan S, Ghandehari-Alavijeh MR, Khamesipour F. Survey of the prevalence of Toxocara cati in stray cats in Isfahan city, Iran by PCR method. Trop Biomed. 2017;34:550–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].El-Seify MA, Marey NM, Satour N, Elhawary NM, Sultan K. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Toxocara cati infection in feral cats in Alexandria city, Northern Egypt. Iran J Parasitol. 2021;16(2):270. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v16i2.6319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Pawar R, Lakshmikantan U, Hasan S, Poornachandar A, Shivaji S. Detection and molecular characterization of Ascarid nematode infection (Toxascaris leonina and Toxocara cati) in captive Asiatic lions (Panthera leo persica) Acta Parasitol. 2012;57(1):67–73. doi: 10.2478/s11686-012-0012-y. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-012-0012-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Mikaeili F, Mirhendi H, Mohebali M, Hosseini M, Sharbatkhori M, Zarei Z, et al. Sequence variation in mitochondrial cox1 and nad1 genes of Ascaridoid nematodes in cats and dogs from Iran. J Helminthol. 2015;89(4):496–501. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X14000133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X14000133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research are provided here courtesy of Network for the Veterinarians of Bangladesh

RESOURCES