Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology Advances logoLink to Neuro-Oncology Advances
. 2024 Aug 2;6(Suppl 1):i16. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae090.048

MMOD-04 LASER INTERSTITIAL THERMAL THERAPY (LITT) AND IMMUNOTHERAPY SYNERGY FOR RECURRENT BRAIN CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Eshita Sharma 1, Oguz Kagan Sahin 2, Paweł Łajczak 3, Aisha Rizwan Ahmed 4, Yasmin Picanço Silva 5, Ayesha Ayesha 6, Anoushka Chatterjee 7, Mohammed Raake 8, Iago Nathan Simon Petry 9
PMCID: PMC11296829

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The confluence of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with immunotherapeutic approaches represents a promising avenue for the management of recurrent brain metastases and glioblastoma. However, the potential synergy between these modalities prompts a thorough examination of their adverse effects. This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the literature to elucidate the adverse effects associated with the combined use of LITT and immunotherapy in treating recurrent gliomas.

METHODS

Thorough systematic searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using predefined search terms to identify pertinent studies. Inclusion criteria comprised case-control studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials investigating the combined utilization of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with immunotherapy, among adult patients diagnosed with recurrent brain metastases and recurrent glioblastoma. Our analysis specifically targeted adverse events (AEs) as the primary outcome of interest.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included four studies, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT), one case-control study, and two prospective cohort studies, with a total of 162 patients. Utilizing a random effects model in STATA, we performed a single-arm analysis of adverse events experienced by 56 patients across 3 studies and reported the combination of LITT with immunotherapy for managing recurrent gliomas demonstrated no significant proportion of adverse effects (Proportion= 0.11, 95% CI= -0.02-0.25, P=0.09).

CONCLUSION

When evaluating adverse effects, the combined approach of LITT with immunotherapy in managing recurrent brain metastases and glioblastoma showed no notable significant percentage of patients incurring adverse events, thereby implying a potential comparable safety profile to conventional treatment modalities. However, further research is warranted to test differences in the incidence of adverse events from LITT with immunotherapy versus a control.

Keywords: LITT, immunotherapy, brain cancer, systematic review, meta-analysis


Articles from Neuro-Oncology Advances are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES