Abstract
Introduction: Fournier gangrene is an uncommon urological emergency caused by microbial agents, resulting in necrosis of the genitalia and perineum. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of early diagnosis and management of Fournier gangrene at KAMC in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at KAMC, Saudi Arabia. The study population included all adult patients diagnosed with Fournier gangrene between 2015 and 2022. Data analysis was performed using RStudio (RStudio, Boston, MA). Frequencies and percentages were used to present categorical data, while medians and interquartile ranges were used to express numerical variables.
Results: The study included 41 patients with Fournier gangrene, the majority (95.12%) being male with a median age of 60 years. The most prevalent comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (85.37%). Ten patients presented to the hospital with sepsis, two of whom were in shock. Within 90 days of admission, two of them had expired. This resulted in a 20% mortality rate among septic patients. The mean FGSI in patients who had died during hospital stays was approximately two times the mean in surviving patients (8.17 and 4.32, respectively). The most utilized imaging study was a CT scan (70.7%). Most patients had undergone multiple debridements (87.7%). The median number of debridements per patient was three, and the interval between each debridement was three days. The most frequent tissue culture finding was mixed organisms, followed by Escherichia coli. Regarding empiric antibiotics, tazocin was the most used, accounting for 22.0%. The most frequently performed adjunctive procedure was the placement of a suprapubic catheter, accounting for 41.5%. Roughly 43.90% required a blood transfusion. Within 90 days of admission, six patients had died, which makes the mortality rate 14.6%. Four of them had died within 30 days of admission (9.76%).
Conclusion: Fournier gangrene is a surgical emergency that requires prompt attention and resuscitation, antibiotic therapy, and surgical debridement. The study identified the demographic factors of patients who presented with the disease and provided the incidence, mortality rate, and outcomes of the disease. It also identified specifics of the pharmacological and surgical management and hospital courses.
Keywords: urological infections, mortality rate, urological emergencies, necrotizing fasciitis, fournier gangrene
Introduction
Fournier gangrene is an uncommon yet fatal necrotizing infection of the perineum and genitalia. Numerous microorganisms, most frequently anaerobic bacteria, are responsible for its development. Early diagnosis and intensive treatment are required to avoid serious consequences. Such as sepsis, multi-organ failure, and death [1,2].
Typical bacteria found in the perineum and genitalia, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacteroides fragilis, and Staphylococcus aureus, were reported to be the most frequently contributing microorganisms to the poly-microbial presentation in individuals with Fournier gangrene [3]. Trauma to perineal areas has been described as a potential cause of infection. Risk factors for Fournier gangrene include diabetes mellitus, long-term steroid use, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), lymphoproliferative disorders, and cytotoxic drug use [4]. Furthermore, clinical indicators such as fluctuance, crepitus, local pain, and lesions on the genitalia and perineum are the mainstays of the Fournier gangrene diagnosis [5]. The most common non-specific laboratory findings in Fournier gangrene are anemia, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, and abnormalities of electrolytes [5].
Two clinical scoring systems are used to evaluate the severity of Fournier gangrene, which are Fournier Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI) and the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) [6]. Imaging confirms the diagnosis, which shows air that represents infection. Standard imaging is X-ray; however, CT is the gold standard [6]. Effectively treating Fournier gangrene is difficult [7]. This is a result of the necrosis, quick progression, and systemic manifestations that lead to sepsis and shock [7].
This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of early diagnosis and management of Fournier gangrene, specifically studying the incidence, mortality rate, risk factors, and hospital stay at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
This article was previously presented as an oral abstract presentation at the 35th Saudi Urological Association Conference on February 15, 2024.
Materials and methods
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study included all adult patients diagnosed with Fournier gangrene between the years 2015 and 2022. Patients with other perineal manifestations that were not diagnosed as Fournier gangrene were excluded from the study.
The primary outcome of the study was to determine the incidence and quantify the mortality rate of Fournier gangrene at KAMC. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and identification of the risk factors for Fournier gangrene.
Data were collected from the BestCare system using a Google spreadsheet. Variables like age, weight, risk factors, diagnostic and treatment methods, microbial agents, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The data were cleaned and reviewed to check for accuracy and mistakes.
Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio (R version 4.3.0, RStudio, Boston, MA). Frequencies and percentages were used to present categorical data, while median and interquartile range (IQR) were used to express numerical variables. Bar charts and pie charts were used to present frequency data.
Results
Demographic characteristics and clinical history
The study included a total of 41 patients with Fournier gangrene, with a majority of 39 (95.1%) being male. The median age of the patients was 60.0 years (interquartile range: 51.0-67.0). The most prevalent comorbidity observed among the patients was diabetes mellitus (DM) in 35 patients (85.37%). Other notable comorbidities included hypertension in 23 patients (56.10%). Cardiac disease in 19 patients (46.34%), renal disease in 13 patients (31.71%), chronic limb ischemia in 12 patients (29.27%), and dyslipidemia in 12 patients (29.27%). Smoking was reported by 10 patients (24.39%). The frequencies and percentages of other risk factors, such as a history of radiation, bed sores, chronic Foley's, suprapubic catheter, malignancy, anti-neoplastic medication usage, substance abuse, and trauma, were relatively low, ranging from 2.4% to 14.63% (Tables 1-2).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics.
BMI: body mass index
Parameter | Interquartile range | Mean | Frequency | Percentage |
Age (years) | 51–67 | 60 | ||
Gender | ||||
Male | 39 | 95.10% | ||
Female | 2 | 4.90% | ||
Height (cm) | 162–173 | 168 | ||
Weight (kg) | 70–93 | 80 | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 25.6–31.5 | 27.9 |
Table 2. Comorbidities.
Parameter | Frequency | Percentage |
Diabetes mellitus | 35 | 85.37% |
Hypertension | 23 | 56.10% |
Cardiac disease | 19 | 46.34% |
Renal disease | 13 | 31.71% |
Chronic limb ischemia | 12 | 29.27% |
Dyslipidemia | 12 | 29.27% |
Smoking | 10 | 24.39% |
Chronic transurethral catheterization | 6 | 14.63% |
Malignancy | 4 | 9.76% |
Bed sores | 4 | 9.76% |
History of radiation | 3 | 7.32% |
Suprapubic catheter at admission | 3 | 7.32% |
Alcohol | 2 | 4.88% |
Anti-neoplastic medications | 2 | 4.88% |
Long-term steroid use | 1 | 2.44% |
Substance abuse | 1 | 2.44% |
Trauma | 1 | 2.44% |
Anatomical extent of the condition and the presenting signs and symptoms
Regarding the anatomical extent of the disease, a clinical anatomical extension of the disease involved the scrotum among most patients (90%), followed by the perineum (49%) and the penis (29%) (Figure 1A). The most reported symptoms were genital pain (80.5%), swelling (80.5%), and black discoloration (58.5%) (Figure 1B). The most common infectious state upon presentation was a localized infection, observed in 31 patients (75.6%). Sepsis was seen in eight patients (19.5%) on admission. Septic shock was observed in two patients (4.9%) upon presentation. The median duration of the disease prior to presentation was 5.5 days (interquartile range: 3.0-10.0). In terms of imaging investigations, computed tomography (CT) was the most commonly utilized modality, performed in 29 patients (70.7%). X-ray imaging was performed in 10 patients (24.4%), ultrasound in 9 patients (22.0%), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in only 1 patient (2.4%, Table 3). The Fournier Gangrene Severity Index was calculated. Patients who survived 90 days since admission scored significantly lower than patients who have died. The mean FGSI among living patients was 4.32. The mean FGSI among dead patients was 8.17 (Table 4).
Table 3. Presentation and diagnostics.
CT: computed tomography scan, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, US: ultrasound
Parameter | Frequency | Percentage |
Mode of presentation | ||
Localized infection | 31 | 75.6% |
Sepsis | 8 | 19.5% |
Septic shock | 2 | 4.9% |
Confirmatory imaging | ||
None | 6 | 14.6% |
X-ray | 10 | 24.4% |
CT | 29 | 70.7% |
MRI | 1 | 2.4% |
US | 9 | 22% |
Table 4. Fournier Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI).
Mortality status | Mean |
Total | 4.56 |
Living | 4.32 |
Dead | 8.17 |
Figure 1. The proportions of the anatomical extent of the disease (A) and symptoms at presentation (B).
Characteristics of surgeries
The surgeries performed for Fournier gangrene had certain characteristics within the studied population. The times of debridements conducted for Fournier gangrene varied, with a median of 3.0 (interquartile range: 2.0-9.5) debridements per patient. The median time between operations ranged between patients, with a median of 3.0 days (interquartile range: 1.5-7.5). Multiple debridements were performed in 87.80% of the cases. Regarding the surgically explored areas, the scrotum was the most frequently explored region, occurring in 92.68% of cases. The perineum was the next most common area explored, observed in 60.98% of cases. Other explored areas included the abdomen (21.95%), penis (17.07%), and perianal area (14.63%, Table 5).
Table 5. Surgically explored areas.
Area | Frequency | Percentage |
Scrotum | 39 | 95.12% |
Perineum | 25 | 60.98% |
Abdomen | 9 | 21.95% |
Penis | 7 | 17.07% |
Perianal area | 6 | 14.63% |
Gastrointestinal | 4 | 9.76% |
Gluteal region | 2 | 4.88% |
Vulva | 1 | 2.44% |
Thigh | 1 | 2.44% |
Suprapubic area | 1 | 2.44% |
The most frequently performed adjunctive procedure was the placement of a suprapubic catheter, performed in 17 patients (41.5%). Stoma creation was the next most common procedure, performed in 11 patients (26.8%). Penectomy and orchidectomy were each performed in five patients (12.2%, Figure 2).
Figure 2. Frequency of adjunctive procedures performed in the study population.
Outcomes of surgeries
A total of 18 patients (43.9%) required blood transfusions, and the median number of transfused units was 2.0 units (1.3 to 6.0). Out of the total study population, 15 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU, Figure 3). The median duration of the ICU stay was eight days (interquartile range: 4-17). The reasons for ICU admission varied among the patients. The most common cause was septic shock, accounting for 53.3% of the admitted ICU cases. Overall, renal failure was observed in 7.3% of the cases. Pneumonia occurred in 4.9% of the patients, while other postoperative complications accounted for around 7.3% (Table 6). Within 90 days of admission, six patients had died, which makes the mortality rate 14.6%. Four of them had died within 30 days of admission (9.76%) (Figure 4). Out of the ten patients who presented to the hospital with sepsis and septic shock, two had died. This results in a mortality rate of 20% for septic presentations.
Table 6. Outcomes of surgery.
Parameter | Mean | Interquartile range | Frequency | Percentage |
Duration of hospital admission (days) | 27 | 12–40.5 | ||
Patients admitted to ICU | 15 | 36.58% | ||
Duration of ICU admission (days) | 8 | 4–17 | ||
Cause of ICU admission | ||||
Septic shock | 8 | 53.30% | ||
Post-op observation | 3 | 20% | ||
Hemorrhagic shock | 1 | 6.66% | ||
Cardiac arrest | 1 | 6.66% | ||
Hypoxemia | 1 | 6.66% | ||
Atrial fibrillation | 1 | 6.66% | ||
Postoperative complications | ||||
Pneumonia | 2 | 4.9% | ||
Renal failure | 3 | 7.3% |
Figure 3. The proportions of patients admitted to ICU.
Figure 4. The proportions of 30-day and 90-day mortality.
Outcomes of the microbiological testing and patterns of antibiotic prescription
The majority of debrided tissue cultures (92.7%) were positive, indicating the presence of microorganisms. Among the positive culture results, various organisms were isolated. However, the most frequent results were mixed organisms (26.8%), followed by E. coli (19.5%, Figure 5). Regarding the empiric antibiotics used in the treatment of Fournier Gangrene, various antibiotics were administered to the patients. The most frequently used empirical antibiotic was Piperacillin/tazobactam, accounting for 62.29% of cases, followed by Vancomycin (43.90%), and Meropenem (39%, Table 7). Tailored antibiotic agents used after culture results were mostly Piperacillin/tazobactam (47.37%) and Meropenem (47.37%, Table 8).
Table 7. Empirical antibiotics.
Antibiotic | Frequency | Percentage |
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 28 | 62.29% |
Vancomycin | 18 | 43.90% |
Meropenem | 16 | 39.00% |
Clindamycin | 15 | 36.58% |
Table 8. Tailored antibiotics.
Antibiotic | Frequency | Percentage |
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 18 | 47.37% |
Meropenem | 18 | 47.37% |
Clindamycin | 11 | 28.20% |
Vancomycin | 10 | 28.95% |
Figure 5. The proportions of the isolated microorganisms.
Postoperative care
Various approaches were employed in wound care for patients with Fournier gangrene. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) dressing was the most commonly used method in 63.41% of cases. Regarding skin cover, primary closure after adequate debridement was the most frequently employed method (56.1%, Table 9).
Table 9. Postoperative care.
Parameter | Frequency | Percentage |
Wound care | ||
VAC dressing | 26 | 63.41% |
Iodine dressing | 15 | 36.58% |
Skin cover | ||
Primary wound closure | 23 | 56.10% |
Secondary wound closure | 10 | 24.39% |
Skin graft | 8 | 19.51% |
Discussion
Fournier gangrene, as described earlier, is a surgical emergency with rapid progression to sepsis and death with high mortality rates. The study showed that the total number of cases of Fournier gangrene at the National Guard Hospital was 41 between 2015 and 2022. The population of the study was mostly male, with a male-to-female ratio of 19:1. The diagnosis was made clinically and confirmed through imaging studies. Treatment was urgent surgical debridement coupled with broad-spectrum antibiotic administration, which was then tailored to the specific causing organism grown in the collected tissue culture. The mortality rate was as low as 15%. This can be attributed to the availability of prompt services in our hospital with a multidisciplinary team approach containing but not limited to urologic, general, and plastic surgeons, nursing staff, emergency department physicians, infectious disease specialists, and intensive care units. The local trends observed in this study showed some differences from similar studies conducted in other parts of the world. According to Barreda et al., they have found that alcoholism and immunosuppression were major risk factors; in contrast, we have found low rates of both risk factors in our population [8].
A study found that Fournier gangrene accounts for 0.02% of all United States hospital admissions. The incidence was found to be 1.6% per 100,000 patients in the male population, mostly in males aged 50-79 years old. Meanwhile, the female population has an incidence of 0.25% per 100,000 patients. Thus, Fournier gangrene has a significant predilection for males. However, females tend to present more acutely and require more interventions [9,10]. Unfortunately, the aggressive disease process has a high mortality rate of 20-40% [11,12].
A global study done in 2022 determined that the best treatment for Fournier gangrene includes fluid resuscitation followed by broad-spectrum antibiotics and extensive surgical debridement [13]. In Fournier gangrene, the infected area has a feculent stench and is large, dark, and coated in macerated skin with early systemic septic shock symptoms that are frequently present [14]. Another local study also shows that co-morbidities such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disease must be included in the FGSI as an important prognostic tool for Fournier gangrene mortality [15].
We have also found evident similarities in our patients to international data; for instance, tissue cultures revealed that the most common finding was mixed bacteria, followed by E. coli and Streptococci, as shown in Figure 5, which is consistent with international data as per Tang et al. [3]. The study is limited by the population size, which is low due to the rarity of the disease; however, it is relatively larger than similar studies. Also, it provides insight into the incidence and mortality rate in relation to demographic data of the disease in the local population, which gives good epidemiological data that can be used to draw strategies and policies for prevention at the local level.
For future studies, we recommend including more hospitals to cover a larger patient population, which would allow for validation of the demographic trends and enable more robust inferential analyses.
Conclusions
To conclude, this article studied Fournier gangrene, which is a surgical emergency that requires prompt attention with resuscitation, antibiotic therapy, and surgical debridement. It identified the demographic factors of patients who presented with the disease and provided the incidence rate, mortality rate, and outcomes of the disease. It also described the specifics of management and hospital courses. It has been found that patients who present to the National Guard Hospital with Fournier Gangrene are most likely to be males, diabetics, with a mean age of 60, and that the mortality rate is 15%.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) issued approval NRC23R/068/02. Please see attached memo of approval along with the IRB-approved research proposal and data collection. The said approval has also been sent as well thru E-CTS with reference number: RYD-23-419812-28127.
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Rayan W. Almasari, Ahmed Alasker, Abdullah Alhaidar, Abdulaziz F. Alajmi, Rayan K. Alsaleh, Ammar Aloufi
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Rayan W. Almasari, Ahmed Alasker, Abdulaziz F. Alajmi, Rayan K. Alsaleh, Ammar Aloufi
Drafting of the manuscript: Rayan W. Almasari, Ahmed Alasker, Abdulaziz F. Alajmi, Rayan K. Alsaleh, Ammar Aloufi
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ahmed Alasker, Abdullah Alhaidar
Supervision: Ahmed Alasker, Abdullah Alhaidar
References
- 1.Fournier’s gangrene: literature review and clinical cases [Internet] Chernyadyev SA, Ufimtseva MA, Vishnevskaya IF, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29949811/ Urol Int. 2018;101:91–97. doi: 10.1159/000490108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fournier gangrene: an historical reappraisal. Short B. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30182399/ Intern Med J. 2018;48:1157–1160. doi: 10.1111/imj.14031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The evaluation of microbiology and prognosis of fournier's gangrene in past five years. Tang LM, Su YJ, Lai YC. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25635243/ Springerplus. 2015;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s40064-014-0783-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.A multistep approach to manage Fournier's gangrene in a patient with unknown type II diabetes: surgery, hyperbaric oxygen, and vacuum-assisted closure therapy: a case report. Pastore AL, Palleschi G, Ripoli A, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23286211/ J Med Case Rep. 2013;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fournier's gangrene. Shyam DC, Rapsang AG. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23578806/ Surgeon. 2013;11:222–232. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fournier’s gangrene diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review. Lewis GD, Majeed M, Olang CA, Patel A, Gorantla VR, Davis N, Gluschitz S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34815897/ Cureus. 2021;13:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Treatment of Fournier's gangrene with vacuum-assisted closure therapy as enhanced recovery treatment modality. Syllaios A, Davakis S, Karydakis L, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32354953/ In Vivo. 2020;34:1499–1502. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.[Fournier gangrene. A retrospective study of 41 cases] Torremadé Barreda J, Millán Scheiding M, Suárez Fernández C, Cuadrado Campaña JM, Rodríguez Aguilera J, Franco Miranda E, Biondo S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20152961/ Cir Esp. 2010;87:218–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fournier gangrene in the emergency department: diagnostic dilemmas, treatments and current perspectives. Auerbach J, Bornstein K, Ramzy M, Cabrera J, Montrief T, Long B. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33204184/ Open Access Emerg Med. 2020;12:353–364. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S238699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fournier’s gangrene: epidemiology and outcomes in the general US population. Sorensen MD, Krieger JN. Urol Int. 2016;97:249–259. doi: 10.1159/000445695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fournier's gangrene. A clinical review. Singh A, Ahmed K, Aydin A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27711086/ Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016;88:157–164. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2016.3.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leslie SW, Rad J, Foreman J. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Fournier Gangrene. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Practical review of the current management of Fournier's gangrene [Internet] Huayllani MT, Cheema AS, McGuire MJ, Janis JE. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35295879/ Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10:0. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.A three-year review of the management of Fournier's gangrene presented in a single Saudi Arabian institute. Katib A, Al-Adawi M, Dakkak B, Bakhsh A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24707378/ Cent European J Urol. 2013;66:331–334. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.03.art22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fournier's gangrene mortality: a 17-year systematic review and meta-analysis. El-Qushayri AE, Khalaf KM, Dahy A, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31962181/ Int J Infect Dis. 2020;92:218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]