Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis (TB), a major public health issue. This case report discusses a 70-year-old female with post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) treated with ruxolitinib who developed miliary TB amidst a COVID-19 infection. The patient presented with a flu-like syndrome over the past week with fatigue and weight loss the last month. When she was admitted to the hospital, the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was positive. Despite the typical COVID-19 presentation, her clinical and radiographic features raised suspicion for disseminated TB. Diagnostic tests, including bronchoscopy and PCR for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, confirmed miliary TB. She was treated with a standard antitubercular regimen, leading to symptomatic improvement. The interplay between COVID-19 and TB is complex, with COVID-19-induced immunosuppression, particularly lymphocytopenia, facilitating TB reactivation. Additionally, ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor used for myelofibrosis, impairs immune defense mechanisms, increasing infection risk, including TB. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of TB in the context of COVID-19 is crucial for effective management and improved patient outcomes. Clinicians should remain vigilant for TB reactivation in patients undergoing treatments such as ruxolitinib and consider alternative diagnoses despite positive SARS-CoV-2 tests. This report highlights the necessity for a comprehensive evaluation and timely intervention to mitigate the compounded risks of COVID-19 and TB.
Keywords: post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, immunosuppression, ruxolitinib, covid-19 coinfection, miliary tuberculosis
Introduction
The global health landscape has dramatically changed with the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which had profound implications for the management and diagnosis of other infectious diseases, notably tuberculosis (TB). TB remains a significant public health issue worldwide. Approximately 10.6 million people were affected by the disease in 2021, reflecting a 4.5% increase from the previous year, largely due to the disruptions caused by the pandemic [1]. In Greece, the incidence of TB was reported to be two cases per 100,000 people in 2022, indicating the persistent presence of this disease despite the overall improvements in healthcare [2].
Studies have shown that COVID-19 patients often exhibit significant lymphocytopenia, particularly a decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, which are crucial for mounting an effective immune response against TB [3]. This immunosuppression can facilitate the reactivation of latent TB infections (LTBI), leading to more severe and disseminated forms of the disease, such as miliary TB, which accounts for 1%-2% of all TB cases and up to 20% of extrapulmonary TB cases [4].
The intersection of TB and COVID-19 is further complicated by the use of immunosuppressive therapies such as ruxolitinib, which is a medication used in the treatment of myeloproliferative disorders. Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, impairs cytokine signaling pathways essential for immune defense, thereby increasing the risk of infections, including TB [5]. Reports have documented cases of ruxolitinib-associated reactivation of LTBI, emphasizing the need for thorough screening and vigilant monitoring in patients receiving this therapy [6].
In this case report, we present a 70-year-old female with a history of post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) treated with ruxolitinib who developed miliary TB in the context of the COVID-19 infection. This case underscores the critical importance of considering alternative diagnoses in patients presenting with atypical clinical and radiographic features during the course of COVID-19, highlighting the necessity for prompt and accurate diagnosis to ensure appropriate management and improve patient outcomes.
Case presentation
A 70-year-old female with a history of post-PV MF, treated with ruxolitinib since 2021, presented to a tertiary care hospital in North Greece. She reported experiencing fatigue, malaise, and a weight loss of approximately 7-8 kg during the last month, along with a loss of appetite over the past month, followed by flu-like symptoms for the past week. Additionally, she had an evening rise in temperature, peaking at 38°C, accompanied by night sweats. There were no reported difficulties with swallowing or breathing, headaches, or bowel or bladder disturbances.
Her medical history included hypertension and diabetes mellitus, under regular treatment. There was no history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or contact with TB within her family or community. She had not received the COVID-19 vaccine and had no history of COVID-19 infection. The patient was diagnosed with polycythemia vera in 2019 and was treated with hydroxyurea until 2021. Then, she was conducted in a bone marrow biopsy due to the presence of splenomegaly and hydroxyurea resistance. The biopsy results revealed the diagnosis of post-PV MF. Her treatment was amended to ruxolitinib at a dose of 10 mg twice daily, as the preferred medication used in these cases.
Her rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 and flu (type A and type B) were negative. On examination, her oxygen saturation was 98% (FiO2: 21%), blood pressure was 140/90 mmHg, heart rate was 120 bpm, temperature was 38.3°C, and respiratory rate was 15 breaths per minute. Cardiopulmonary and neurological examinations were normal, with no signs of meningitis. There was no evidence of pallor, rashes, icterus, cyanosis, clubbing, lymphadenopathy, or pedal edema. The abdomen was soft, with no hepatomegaly but with splenomegaly.
Laboratory investigations revealed lymphocytopenia and anemia. The inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were elevated. Liver function tests indicated mild impairment (Table 1).
Table 1. Laboratory investigations on admission.
HCT: hematocrit, Hb: hemoglobin, CRP: C-reactive protein, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, SGOT: serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, SGPT: serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, GGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase
| Parameter | Value | Reference range |
| Lymphocytes | 0.42 × 10³/μL | 1-3 × 10³/μL |
| HCT | 32.1% | 36%-47% |
| Hb | 10.9 mg/dL | 12-15 mg/dL |
| CRP | 7.61 mg/dL | <1 mg/dL |
| ESR | 90 mm/hour | 0-20 mm/hour |
| SGOT | 50 IU/L | 0-35 IU/L |
| SGPT | 43 IU/L | 0-35 IU/L |
| ALP | 159 IU/L | 44-147 IU/L |
| GGT | 70 IU/L | 0-30 IU/L |
| Total bilirubin | 1.54 mg/dL | 0.1-1.2 mg/dL |
| LDH | 520 IU/L | 120-230 IU/L |
Urinalysis was normal, and urine culture was negative. Tests for HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) were negative. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) returned positive after 24 hours. Her chest X-ray showed diffusely distributed reticulonodular infiltration (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Chest X-ray on admission.
Arrows show diffusely distributed infiltrates with micronodular patterns.
The chest computed tomography (CT) scan (without contrast) revealed diffuse bilateral miliary nodules in all lung segments (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Chest computed tomography without contrast (lung window).
Arrows show diffuse bilateral and widespread miliary nodules.
The differential diagnosis included COVID-19 pneumonia and miliary TB.
The patient was treated with remdesivir and a prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin according to COVID-19 treatment guidelines, as she was immunocompromised and at high risk of developing severe COVID-19 disease. However, there was high suspicion of disseminated TB according to her medical history and chest X-ray and CT scan findings.
From the onset of the patient's presentation, we commenced investigations for possible active TB. The tuberculin skin test (TST) was conducted by injecting 0.1 mL of tuberculin-purified protein derivative (PPD) into the inner surface of the forearm. After 72 hours, the result was 0 mm, which could be a false negative due to the patient's history of post-PV MF or a recent TB infection within the past 8-10 weeks. A blood sample was then analyzed using the QuantiFERON test, yielding an indeterminate result, thus rendering the likelihood of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection inconclusive.
To enhance the sensitivity of our diagnostic approach and aid in differential diagnosis, we performed bronchoscopy with the collection of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The BAL specimen was subjected to acid-fast bacilli staining, gene Xpert PCR, and cultures for TB, as well as common bacteria and fungi. The PCR test confirmed the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Consequently, the patient was initiated on a four-drug antitubercular regimen comprising rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, in accordance with national TB treatment guidelines. Ruxolitinib was discontinued. The decision to discontinue ruxolitinib was made to reduce immunosuppression and allow the patient's immune system to combat the tuberculosis infection more effectively. This approach is crucial in managing TB in immunocompromised patients, where the balance between treatment efficacy and infection control must be carefully maintained. The patient exhibited symptomatic improvement within one week of initiating the antitubercular therapy.
Discussion
TB remains a major public health issue worldwide. In 2021, the number of people who were affected by TB, including drug-resistant TB, increased after many years of gradual decline, a setback attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic's effect [7].
Risk factors for TB include immunosuppressive conditions (such as HIV) or drugs, comorbidities (diabetes, chronic renal or hepatic failure, chronic obstructive disease, and lymphoproliferative disorders), young age, and socioeconomic and behavioral factors such as tobacco smoke, alcohol or drug use, and poor living conditions (e.g., overcrowded households, homelessness, malnutrition, low accessibility to healthcare services, and poor personal hygiene) [8]. The patient had a history of diabetes mellitus, and this is also a risk factor for TB in our case. In the last few years, epidemiology data on miliary TB have dramatically changed because of the widespread use of biological agents, chemotherapy, and immunosuppressant drugs [4].
COVID-19 can dysregulate the immune system, which could predispose a patient to reactivation of LTBI. CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were significantly decreased in patients with COVID-19, and this had an impact both on the severity of the disease and on the prognosis. CD4+ T cells are key components of the immune response against intracellular infections, including TB infection [9]. There are cases in the literature with COVID-19 and tuberculosis coinfection [10]. During latent TB infection, the persistence of mycobacteria induces a chronic pro-inflammatory response within the lung parenchyma, which is important to maintain the structural integrity of the granuloma [11]. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and INF-γ are the main cytokines that contribute to the formation of granulomas, and these cytokines simultaneously play a key role in the pro-inflammatory immunomodulation of the response against SARS-CoV-2 [12].
Another possible hypothesis for the reactivation of LTBI in our patient is the treatment with ruxolitinib. The suggested mechanism of action of ruxolitinib is the attenuation of cytokine signaling via the inhibition of JAK1 and JAK2, resulting in antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects [13]. Ruxolitinib is authorized for the treatment of disease-related splenomegaly or symptoms in adult patients with primary myelofibrosis (MF) (also known as chronic idiopathic MF), post-PV MF, or post-essential thrombocythemia MF. This therapeutic agent is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with PV who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. Currently, ruxolitinib is also indicated for the treatment of patients with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) [14].
The pathophysiological mechanism that explains the relationship between this therapeutic regimen and the reactivation of TB is the disruption of JAK-STAT signaling. This disruption affects immune homeostasis and impairs the maturation and function of dendritic and T cells. The main side effect of inhibitors of JAK1 and JAK2 can be an increased risk of infection, related to a depressed Th1 response and a reduced production of interferon-gamma (INF-γ). IFN-γ is a key cytokine involved in protective immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, regulating the expression of genes involved in antimycobacterial effector functions [15]. There are several case reports that present the ruxolitinib-associated reactivation of LTBI [13,16-20]. The diagnosis of latent TB with PPD and the QuantiFERON test may be misleading in patients after the initiation of ruxolitinib. Moreover, PPD shows anergy in miliary TB and can become positive after the initiation of antituberculosis treatment. So, it explains why clinicians have to screen for latent TB prior to starting therapy with ruxolitinib.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this case report underscores the critical interplay between COVID-19 and miliary tuberculosis TB, particularly in immunocompromised patients undergoing treatment with ruxolitinib. The dual diagnosis of COVID-19 and miliary TB in a patient with post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis emphasizes the necessity for clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion for TB, even when a positive COVID-19 test might suggest a straightforward viral pneumonia diagnosis. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of TB, alongside the management of COVID-19, is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This case illustrates the complexities in diagnosing and treating coinfections and highlights the need for comprehensive patient evaluations to ensure timely and effective therapeutic interventions. The findings advocate for vigilant monitoring and preemptive screening for latent TB in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies such as ruxolitinib to mitigate the risks of reactivation and severe disease progression.
Acknowledgments
During the preparation of this work, the AI tools ChatGPT and Jasper were used to improve the readability and language of the manuscript. Authors are fully responsible for the content of their manuscript, even those parts produced by the AI tools, and are thus liable for any breach of publication ethics.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Vasiliki E. Georgakopoulou, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Maria Loutsou, Konstantina Chadia, Nikolaos Roussakis
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Vasiliki E. Georgakopoulou, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Maria Loutsou, Konstantina Chadia, Nikolaos Roussakis
Drafting of the manuscript: Vasiliki E. Georgakopoulou, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Maria Loutsou, Konstantina Chadia, Nikolaos Roussakis
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Vasiliki E. Georgakopoulou, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Maria Loutsou, Konstantina Chadia, Nikolaos Roussakis
Supervision: Vasiliki E. Georgakopoulou, Paschalis Steiropoulos
References
- 1.The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global tuberculosis epidemic. Falzon D, Zignol M, Bastard M, Floyd K, Kasaeva T. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1234785. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1234785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100,000 people) [ Jun; 2024 ]. 2024. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.TBS.INCD https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.TBS.INCD
- 3.Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:762–768. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miliary tuberculosis: a new look at an old foe. Sharma SK, Mohan A, Sharma A. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2016;3:13–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activity of ruxolitinib. Elli EM, Baratè C, Mendicino F, Palandri F, Palumbo GA. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1186. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis following treatment of myelofibrosis with ruxolitinib. Abidi MZ, Haque J, Varma P, Olteanu H, Guru Murthy GS, Dhakal B, Hari P. Case Rep Hematol. 2016;2016:2389038. doi: 10.1155/2016/2389038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.WHO report: years of progress in global tuberculosis upset by COVID-19 pandemic. Stephenson J. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3:0. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Risk factors for tuberculosis. Narasimhan P, Wood J, Macintyre CR, Mathai D. Pulm Med. 2013;2013:828939. doi: 10.1155/2013/828939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lymphocyte subset (CD4+, CD8+) counts reflect the severity of infection and predict the clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Liu Z, Long W, Tu M, et al. J Infect. 2020;81:318–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Four patients with COVID-19 and tuberculosis, Singapore, April-May 2020. Tham SM, Lim WY, Lee CK, et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:2764–2766. doi: 10.3201/eid2611.202752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Acquired predisposition to mycobacterial disease due to autoantibodies to IFN-gamma. Kampmann B, Hemingway C, Stephens A, et al. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2480–2488. doi: 10.1172/JCI19316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: its clinical potential. Ostojic A, Vrhovac R, Verstovsek S. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2012;8:95–103. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S23277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Disseminated tuberculosis in a patient treated with a JAK2 selective inhibitor: a case report. Colomba C, Rubino R, Siracusa L, Lalicata F, Trizzino M, Titone L, Tolomeo M. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:552. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. Kiladjian JJ, Winton EF, Talpaz M, Verstovsek S. Expert Rev Hematol. 2015;8:391–401. doi: 10.1586/17474086.2015.1045869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reactivation of tuberculosis following ruxolitinib therapy for primary myelofibrosis: case series and literature review. Khalid F, Damlaj M, AlZahrani M, Abuelgasim KA, Gmati GE. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2021;14:252–256. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2020.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Disseminated tuberculosis associated with ruxolitinib. Hopman RK, Lawrence SJ, Oh ST. Leukemia. 2014;28:1750–1751. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Use of rifampin for treatment of disseminated tuberculosis in a patient with primary myelofibrosis on ruxolitinib. Branco B, Metsu D, Dutertre M, Marchou B, Delobel P, Recher C, Martin-Blondel G. Ann Hematol. 2016;95:1207–1209. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2684-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pulmonary tuberculosis reactivation following ruxolitinib treatment in a patient with primary myelofibrosis. Chen YH, Lee CH, Pei SN. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56:1528–1529. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.963082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.[Fatal tuberculosis during treatment with ruxolitinib] Keizer S, Gerritsen R, Jauw Y, Janssen J, Koopman B, Bresser P. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25990328/ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:0. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ruxolitinib-associated tuberculosis: a case of successful ruxolitinib rechallenge. Palandri F, Polverelli N, Catani L, Vianelli N. Ann Hematol. 2015;94:519–520. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2183-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


