Commentary: Analysis of Advanced Degrees in Academic Plastic Surgery Faculty

I would like to express my appreciation to the authors of “Analysis of Additional Degrees in Academic Plastic Surgery Faculty” for their insightful discussion on the significance of diversity in academic plastic surgery. ¹ The title of the manuscript suggests an analysis of additional degrees (ADs) and how they can equip plastic surgeons with essential skills and knowledge for research, administration, and clinical practice. However, the authors compellingly argue that gender equity may be the primary rationale for pursuing ADs.

It is crucial to recognize the importance of diversity in academic plastic surgery for several reasons. Firstly, it enhances creativity and innovation, leading to improved patient care. Secondly, it identifies biases in patient care, thus promoting equity in healthcare. Thirdly, it provides a more holistic view of the patient, leading to better outcomes. Additionally, diversity attracts top talent to our specialty, which is essential for continued progress and growth.

The authors also discuss the challenges of achieving diversity in academic plastic surgery. These include a lack of diversity in the applicant pool, unconscious biases of faculty members, and the absence of mentorship and sponsorship for underrepresented minorities. To address these challenges, the authors provide a call to action, which includes recruiting more underrepresented minorities to medical school, providing support to underrepresented minorities interested in plastic surgery, training faculty members to become aware of their biases, and implementing mentorship programs for underrepresented minorities.

I support the authors’ recommendations and suggest that we also address the culture of academic plastic surgery. The competitive and hierarchical nature of the field can make it challenging for underrepresented minorities to feel supported and welcomed. Thus, we must create a more inclusive and supportive culture to ensure the success of all individuals in academic plastic surgery.

While I endorse the role of ADs for future faculty members, I believe that they should not be the sole prerequisite for academic promotion, particularly for underrepresented groups, including women and minorities. We must strive to make academic plastic surgery representative of the population we serve and welcoming to all individuals.