Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2024 Jun 25;19(7):1583–1592. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.4c00236

De Novo Synthesis and Structural Elucidation of CDR-H3 Loop Mimics

Guangkuan Zhao a, Alexis D Richaud a, R Thomas Williamson b, Michael Feig c,*, Stéphane P Roche a,*
PMCID: PMC11299430  NIHMSID: NIHMS2013948  PMID: 38916527

Abstract

The binding affinity of antibodies to specific antigens stems from a remarkably broad repertoire of hypervariable loops known as complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). While recognizing the pivotal role of the heavy-chain 3 CDRs (CDR-H3s) in maximizing antibody–antigen affinity and specificity, the key structural determinants responsible for their adaptability to diverse loop sequences, lengths, and non-canonical structures are hitherto unknown. To address this question, we achieved a de novo synthesis of bulged CDR-H3 mimics excised from their full antibody context. CD and NMR data revealed that these stable standalone β-hairpin scaffolds are well-folded and retain many of the native bulge CDR-H3 features in water. In particular, the tryptophan residue –highly conserved across CDR-H3 sequences– was found to extend the kinked base of these β-bulges through a combination of stabilizing intramolecular hydrogen bond and CH/π interaction. The structural ensemble consistent with our NMR observations exposed the dynamic nature of residues at the base of the loop, suggesting that β-bulges act as molecular hinges connecting the rigid stem to the more flexible loops of CDR-H3s. We anticipate that this deeper structural understanding of CDR-H3s will lay the foundation to inform the design of antibody drugs broadly and engineer novel CDR-H3 peptide scaffolds as therapeutics.

Keywords: CDR-H3 loop mimics, β-bulge structure, β-hairpin peptide, conformational ensemble, standalone CDR-H3 scaffold

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2013948-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Following an infection, repeated cycles of antigen-binding affinity selection accelerate the production of B cells to express a large repertoire of primary antibodies (Abs). These antibodies share a central core structure wrapped around a constant and a variable region that combines a heavy and a light chain (H, L respectively) each being composed of three CDRs tipped by functional loops essential to maximize the antigen-binding affinity (paratope). The initial Ab germline selection usually requires high levels of promiscuity and flexibility within the paratope center (L3/H3 loops).(1) One of the current hypotheses on how extensive the repertoire of antibodies can be generated via germline and somatic selection(2) relies markedly on the mechanisms controlling the CDR-H3 diversity.(3) Upon successive exposure to the same antigen, the affinity-driven selection results in the rigidification of CDRs to procure antibodies with an exquisite antigen-binding affinity.(46) Although still debated(7,8), this mechanism has been proposed to be intimately associated with the rigidification of CDR-H3s(5,912), thus raising questions about the origin and the relationship between H3 loops’ binding affinity and their conformational adaptivity upon binding.

While each of the CDR-L1–3 and H1–2 structures can be entirely defined into distinct canonical ensembles(1315), the relationship between the primary amino acid sequences of CDR-H3s and their 3D-structures has remained unclear for over 20 years. CDR-H3s are indeed known to possess an extraordinary variability of primary sequences(2,3,16) and lengths(17) which drastically increases the conformational space sampled by their loops(18,19) and their ability to access binding-competent conformations.(5,10,2021) For example, a remarkable CDR-H3 loop conformational switch resulting in a drastic cis-trans proline isomerization was recently characterized in the course of antibody 9E5 response to antigen binding.(22) Along these lines, it was shown that H3 loops are typically accountable for ~30% of the entire antibody paratope surface (out of six loops)(23), and possess innate dynamic properties to maximize conformational selection geared toward antigen binding.(2426) Given the unsolved challenge posed by H3 loops for computational modeling, there is currently no way to systematically and accurately predict their 3D-structural ensembles to assist the rational design of antibody drugs.(2731)

The vast majority of CDR-H3s possess an irregular bulged β-structure flanking both loop termini that causes the variable loops to protrude in a kinked manner.(3234) Yet the role played by this motif in the CDR nucleation and/or in its thermodynamic stability remain practically unexplored. One could imagine that the promiscuity of bulged H3 loops among all CDR-H3s is not a result of accidental misfolding, but instead has been evolutionary optimized to favor the display of a large repertoire of 3D-structures that can conformationally adapt and rigidify to achieve an optimum Ag binding pose. Guided by the bioinformatics analysis of known CDR-H3 like structures, we synthesized an archetypal CDR-H3 bulge motif—AR•••FD YW— excised from the pembrolizumab antibody (Protein Data Bank (PDB) code: 5B8C) into standalone β-hairpin mimics and determined their innate stability. To obtain stable CDR-H3 structures, variations of the original sequence 1a were evaluated. We determined the unique spectral signature of this motif by CD (circular dichroism) and NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy combined with computational analysis. The strong correlation observed between the thermal denaturation curves (CD-melts) of the bulge motif and the entire hairpin strongly suggests that bulges afford additional stabilization to the global hairpin fold in comparison to a regular β-hairpin. In addition, the NMR-generated conformational ensemble of the H3 β-hairpin mimic 1d revealed that many of the key features present in CDR-H3 crystal structures are present in the free state solution structure. This suggests that the intact antibody framework is not essential in stabilizing the CDR-H3 motif, and that synthetic CDR-H3 mimics can be studied for the first time outside of their full-antibody context. The distinctive features presented herein provide important insights for crafting bioactive peptides into novel and stable CDR-H3 scaffolds and ultimately inform the design of antibody drugs broadly.

Results and Discussion

Identification of β-bulge consensus sequences and structural variations from PDB structures and their occurrence in CDR-H3s.

Although β-bulges are relatively common secondary structures (avg. 2.5 per protein)(3537), they are usually considered as simple strand misalignment irregularities.(38,39) As originally described by Nakamura over 25 years ago(32), most antibody CDR-H3s (n-residue long loop) possess a G1 bulged “torso” domain wrapped around a prototypical three-residue bulge sequence R_0D_nY_n+1 (magenta in Figure 1) featuring a salt bridge R+0:D-(n) as the key structuring element and a distinctive side-chain hydrogen bond between the W(n+2) NHε1 and the backbone carbonyl of F(n-1). Given the increasingly large number of high-resolution crystal structures (res ≤ 2.5 Å), in the PDB, we decided to take a more comprehensive view of G1 bulge motifs. A structure-based search extracted a broad range of antibody, nanobody, and non-antibody protein structures with non-redundant sequences (>90%) containing the characteristic forked hydrogen-bond network of bulges with loops of varying lengths (Figure 1A). While β-bulge motifs were found with a wide variety of sequences, the highest level of sequence and structure conservation was found for CDR-H3 loops with a consensus sequence pattern of YCAR-loop-D YWGQ. Residues CH92 and GH104 (with corresponding Kabat numbering) represent the start and end of CDR-H3 motifs with residues forming the typical β-bulge base underlined.

Figure 1. Structural and conformational analysis of extended β-bulges edging CDR-H3 loops from PDB structures.

Figure 1.

(A) Schematic representation of (C+/C−) β-bulge types based on H-bond patterns between the loop and stem segments of CDR-H3s (SI, Figure S1); Introducing a general numbering notation A-1R_0Fn-1D_nX_n+1Wn+2 for any 6-residue extended bulge sequence and logo plot representing the sequence diversity of bulged CDR-H3s. (B) Ramachandran analysis of bulged CDR-H3 structures with backbone φ/ψ torsion angles highlighting the conformational diversity and the non-canonical space sampled at positions n-1 (mauve) and n (red). Data is shown for all clusters with YCARx..xDYWGQ consensus sequences. (C) Violin plot presenting the distribution of structural features for CDR-H3 bulge residues. Boxes indicate first quartile, median, and third quartile. Whiskers identify data outside the central quarters within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Pembrolizumab values indicated with ‘x’ marks. (D) Working hypothesis based on proposed non-covalent interactions within CDR-H3 β-bulges; Characteristic features include: A(-1):W(n+2) CH/π and Y(n+1):R(0) cation-π interactions, R(0):D(n) ionic pair, and a W(n+2):F(n+1) intramolecular H-bond shown on the prototypical bulged CDR-H3 of pembrolizumab (PBD: 5B8C).

We subsequently focused our analysis on structural motifs extracted from the PDB (in March 2021) with a sequence similar to the consensus with 4 to 20 residue-long loops (see SI for details). In this analysis, even identical consensus sequences were considered to capture most loop and bulge structural variations. As a result, we identified about 3,283 structural fragments matching the consensus sequence pattern. As introduced previously by Gray,(29,40) a τ101 vs α101 angle plot was used to distinguish loops with bulges found in a kinked orientation to those of regular hairpins (Figure S1). Out of the entire set, 2,377 structures had bulge-like features, whereas the remaining structures mostly consisted of regular hairpins. The loop length distribution in the structures with bulges was consistent to earlier reports on CDR-H3s with a mean length of 11.4 AAs (Figure S2).(2) Overall, sequences were highly conserved at positions −2 (>99.9% C), −1 (>81.6% A), 0 (>73.7% R), n (>77.6% D), n+1 (>58.8% Y), and n+2 (99.7% W) (Figure 1A). The extracted structures were categorized into (C+)-bulges (34%) – similar in structure to an antiparallel G1 bulge with a hydrogen bond from the n+1 amide to the carbonyl at the 0 position (based on NH-OC distances of less than 2.75 Å) – and (C−)-bulges (66%) lacking the third bulge hydrogen bond. Further clustering based on backbone structure revealed six main subclusters of bulge-like conformations presenting subtle structural variations (Figures S3S9). According to our Ramachandran plot analysis (Figure 1B) the backbone conformational space of the main bulge residues is fairly constant across all CDR-H3 structures, with position 0 mostly populating the polyproline type-II region, position n populating both γ’ or α-regions, and position n+1 mostly populating the β-region. Strikingly, the last two CDR-H3 loop residues, also pertaining to the bulge at positions n-1 and n occupied γ’ or αL basins, and δ or α basins respectively, illustrating a significant conformational variability imparted by the twisted geometry of β-bulges (Figure 1C).(4142) In addition, this analysis revealed that these vicinal residues (n,n+1) adopt unusual conformations similar to an inverse NHN γ-turn with the NH(n+1) hydrogen bonded perpendicular to the acceptor lone pair N at position n and to the side-chain carbonyl forcing residue n into a bridge conformation between γ’- to αL-regions.(4344)

Our structural analysis revealed that the typical 3-residue kinked base of bulges (noted in magenta: 0, n,n+1) play a significant role in stabilizing CDR-H3s. In addition to the characteristic bifurcated hydrogen-bond pattern of the β-bulge base between positions 0, n, and n+1, conserved interactions consist of a salt bridge between positions 0 and n, cation-π interactions between 0 and n+1 (~5.0 Å) (Figure 1CD). More importantly, additional residues on the opposite face of the bulge base (positions −1, n-1 and n+2, noted in blue) are clearly contributing to extend the flanks of the bulge. CH-π interactions between −1 and n-1 and the tryptophan at n+2 (both ~4.0 Å), and a hydrogen bond between the n-1 carbonyl and the n+2 tryptophan side chain NHε appear to further stabilize the kinked backbone to help connect the H3-loop conformation to its stem. Yet the conformational dispersion observed across the twisted backbone (n-1,n,n+1) likely reflects that CDR-H3 topologies are intimately linked to additional stabilizing interactions with other CDRs and the antibody framework itself. This finding raises the intriguing question which of these structural features are preserved in CDR-H3 scaffolds outside of the native antibody context. To replicate the intricate structures of CDR-H3s into folded and thermally stable short scaffolds, a screening of biomimetic constructs was deemed necessary. As shown in the archetypal (C−)-bulge motif of pembrolizumab (PDB code: 5B8C), we hypothesized that a number of weak attractive non-covalent interactions including a CH/π interaction between proximal A(0):W(n+2), a R+(0):D-(n) salt bridge potentially associated with a π–salt stacking from the Y(n+1) aromatic side chain, and an intramolecular side chain hydrogen bond Wn+2:F(n-1) could be collectively implicated to stabilize the structural kinked base of these β-bulges.(45)

Engineering a library of stand-alone β-hairpin peptides mimics of bulged CDR-H3.

To test this hypothesis and identify a de novo synthetic β-hairpin mimic of a CDR-H3 (C−)-bulge, we carried out the synthesis of a peptide library 1a-l using a typical Fmoc-chemistry on solid support (Table inset in Figure 2A). As a proof-of-principle, we selected the CDR-H3 apex of pembrolizumab (Figure 1D), to design our bulged hairpin mimics. The native sequence excised from pembrolizumab was initially capped by a short stabilizing RW•••WE motif in 1a, but this peptide was shown by CD spectroscopy to be fully unfolded (vide infra).(46) As a control, a synthetic coil model 1b of similar primary sequence was also prepared to calibrate the unfolded baseline required for CD-melts analysis. Within this peptide library, most analogs 1a-j and 1l possess a modified 10-residue loop (F10G) to enhance solubility, while peptide 1k mimic an additional example of CDR-H3 loop excised from the GY-14 antibody (PDB code 6J14).

Figure 2. Characterization of the β-hairpin tertiary structures and a kinked bulge-like motif signature by CD spectroscopy.

Figure 2.

(A) Synthetic Library of CDR-H3 peptide mimics; Synthetic yields and thermodynamic folding properties of β-hairpins obtained by CD analysis are reported. (B) Overlay of CD spectra obtained at 0 °C between a regular benchmark hairpin 1l and the novel bulge-like hairpins 1d-k: typical exciton couplet for a W/W pair at the hairpin strap termini (228 ± 1 nm) and a novel CD band attributed to the bulge-like structure (202 ± 2 nm). (C) Representative thermal denaturation of hairpin 1d monitored at both 202 and 228 nm. (D) Comparison between individual best-fitted melting curves for selected hairpins 1d,h,k based on a two-state model (global hairpin fraying vs local kinked motif denaturation in solid and dashed lines respectively).

Specific substitutions (lysine/valine: A4(K/V), phenylalanine/N-methyl-tryptophan: W17(F/MeW), and asparagine: D15N) were incorporated into our design to probe the non-covalent interactions within the extended structure around the bulge of CDR-H3s. A major hurdle in producing acyclic hairpins is often associated with the entropic penalty of long-loop nucleation (> 10-residue), therefore we incorporated a β-strap RWV•••(V/H)WE developed by our group to strengthen the hairpin scaffold.(47) This approach capitalized on a salt bridge at the hairpin termini following a tryptophan zipper like stabilizing W/W interaction (48) and a hydrophobic packing pair V/(V/H) in place of the original CDR-H3 C96/G111 pair. This strap technology affords enthalpic stability required to rigidify the N- and C-hairpin termini and minimize any undesired fraying. The length of the strap proved to be crucial to enabling a relatively high %-folding of each peptide in a two-stranded β-hairpin conformation required for studying the CDR-H3 motif. Initial results demonstrated that the V3/V18 pair was more efficient in structuring these hairpins (see Figure 2, inset Table, 1d vs 1e) and was therefore carried on throughout the study. As a control, a “regular” (non-bulged) [10:12]-hairpin 1l was prepared with a similar strap to contrast the folding properties of bulge-like analogues by CD and NMR spectroscopy.

Tertiary structure and thermal stability of CDR-H3 β-hairpin mimics evaluated by CD spectroscopy.

To evaluate the impact of various (C−)-bulge sequences on the global hairpin stability by CD spectroscopy, we specifically modified residues at the −1, n, and n+2 positions. The cross-strand pair of tryptophans W2/W19 close to the N−/C− strap termini creates a characteristic and very intense exciton couplet maxima at 212 and 228 ± 1 nm in the far-UV CD spectra of β-hairpins (negative/positive maxima from π–π* transition).(49) This spectroscopic probe positioned nearby the hairpin termini can be exploited to rapidly and reliably rank the stability of hairpins 1c-l in water (Table inset in Figure 2A). Regrettably, the poor solubility of hairpin 1c in water affected the folding results thus requiring the addition of MeOH (10% vol/vol). To circumvent this issue, a F10G substitution was designed at the center of the H3 loop sequence in hairpins 1d-j to reduce hydrophobicity while affording additional flexibility to the loop. Strikingly, a unique positive CD band at 202 ± 2 nm was observed on each hairpin spectra with varying intensity except for the “regular” hairpin 1l and the unfolded peptide 1j (Figure 2B). CD-spectra were also deconvoluted to determine individual elements of secondary structure using BeStSel.(50) The results converged to suggest that the positive Cotton effect at 202 ± 2 nm (Figure 2B) corresponds a right-handed twist of an antiparallel β-sheet which may conceivably be imparted by a kinked structure as seen in β-bulge structures (SI, Figures S916). In addition, the thermal denaturation of these acyclic hairpins 1c-l was performed from 0 to 95 °C by monitoring the disappearance of both bands at 202 and 228 nm corresponding to the local kinked, bulge-like conformation and the hairpin termini respectively (Figure 2C). CD-melts were computed by fitting the ellipticity intensity decay as a function of temperature [θ(T)]202/228 to the thermodynamic Gibbs–Helmholtz equation for a two-state model of transition (ΔCp0, see thermodynamic data SI, Table S3).(51) With the exception of 1c, the unfolded analog 1j, and hairpin 1k from a different CDR-H3 loop, all bulge-like mimics were highly folded (χF ≥ 65% at 18 °C) and structurally stable hairpins with melting temperatures (Tm) largely exceeding physiological temperature. To compare stability more accurately across this series of hairpins (single AA substitution per sequence), we performed a simultaneous global fit of melting curves (Figure 2A, see SI Figure S32 and Table S5). Noticeably, the D15N substitution in 1f had a profound destabilizing effect. This result suggests that the R5:D15 ionic interaction might contribute to the stability of the bulge-like structures as previously proposed by Nakamura.(32) In stark contrast, both A4K and A4V substitutions in hairpins 1g and 1h respectively afforded a substantial gain of stability above physiological temperature (Tm upshift) which led to a thermostable hairpin behavior (Figure 2D, SI Table S5). The flatter slopes of CD-melts observed for 1g and 1h below 30 °C and at Tm demonstrate the benefit of sturdier bulge-like motifs on the global hairpin unfolding. Denaturation experiments additionally support that the lack of cooperativity between the kinked and stem segments of β-hairpins improves their overall thermal stability. To probe the importance of the A4:W17 interaction, two substitutions W17F (in 1j) and W17MeW (in 1i) were evaluated. The first W17F substitution completely prevented the hairpin formation of 1j yielding a random coil structure, therefore demonstrating that a bulge-like fold is greatly dependent on the W17 indole side-chain. Secondly, the W17MeW modification designed to suppress any potential side-chain H-bond also largely affected the denaturation curve of hairpin 1i with a loss of about 20%-folding throughout the entire range of temperature (e.g. 1i vs 1d, ΔΔG of +0.4 kcal/mol). These results are in full agreement with the NMR data (vide infra, Figure 3BC) supporting the notion that the W17 residue plays a pivotal role in the kinked bulge-like structure through hydrogen bonding and a CH/π interaction with A4.

Figure 3. NMR structure of a bulge-like CDR-H3 β-hairpin mimic in aqueous solution.

Figure 3.

(A) Backbone amide HN and Hα chemical shift deviations (CSDs) for hairpin 1d highlighting a downfield abnormality at the bulge D15:Y16 residues. (B) Strip cross sections through the NOESY spectrum of hairpin 1d locating the A4:W17 and [R5,D15]:Y16 long-range correlations through space (left), along with the most significant side-chain CSD values for these residues. (C) Upfield CSDs recorded for the bulge residue 4 (A/V) reflecting a CH-π shielding interaction created by W17. (D) Overlay of 1H NMR traces revealing the W17(Hε1) signal line broadening with the temperature indicative of a weak intramolecular hydrogen-bond in 1d. (E) Dynamic structure of the bulged-like hairpin 1d in solution (PDB code: 8W0Q). Overlay of the five main conformer populations representative of the global 20-state ensemble of 1d elucidated by NMR spectroscopy and computational modeling with the stabilizing terminal β-strap (grey side chains) and the kinked/extended base of the β-bulge-like structure (magenta/blue).

To further probe the stability of these hairpins, a pH acidification (6.5 to 2.2) was used to induce an acid-mediated denaturation.(52) Unlike the regular hairpin 1l which is fully unfolded at such acidic pH, the kinked hairpins 1c-k were noticeably less affected (at the exception of 1e and 1k bearing an acid-labile histidine in the strap, SI Figure S30, Table S4). Despite the fact that the CD-band at 202 nm disappeared at this low pH, the overall hairpin folds remained exceptionally high (χF 60–80%) with Tm>30C, thus highlighting the promise of engineering highly-structured CDR-H3 peptide mimetics. In addition, the CD-study demonstrates that the kinked, bulge-like motifs of CDR-H3s can be easily identified by their intense spectroscopic signature at 202 ± 2 nm. Overall, kinked β-hairpins 1d-i are better folded than the regular benchmark hairpin 1l (ΔχF > 10–20%). These results indicate that a biomimetic design incorporating bulge motifs at the edge of a long H3 loop can deliver highly structured β-hairpins.

Structural characterization and dynamic conformational ensemble determination of a stand-alone CDR-H3 peptide mimic.

To elucidate the structural features of our original CDR-H3 model, 1H, TOCSY, 1H–13C HSQC, and 1H–1H NOESY NMR spectra were recorded for hairpin 1d in water containing small amounts of DMSO-d6 (90:10 vol/vol) to increase solubility. As shown in Figure 3A, the secondary chemical shift deviations (CSDs) from both backbone HN and Hα signals in the R1WVAR•••YWVWE20 sequence revealed a typical pattern of β-sheet register flanking the 10-residue [RDYRGDMGFD] loop. These data are essentially consistent with a [10:12]-hairpin fold. Of importance, both HN and Hα CSDs of residues D15 and Y16 in hairpin 1d were abnormally high (0.25–0.70 ppm, Figure 3A). This notable stereoelectronic effect, presumably imparted by the presence of a kinked, bulge-like structure, prompted us to further examine the key side chain interactions between each residue (Figure 3B). We found that theβ– and γ–hydrogen signals on both R5 and D15 residues experienced significant upfield shifts (CSDs of −0.47 to −0.76 ppm) presumably due to a shielding effect of the facing Y16 aromatic ring. This interpretation was confirmed by a set of medium to strong long-range NOESY correlations between Y16(Hδ/ε) and both R5(Hβ) and D15(Hβ) suggesting that these three residues are in close contact interactions around the Y16 π-system (Figure 3B).(53) These results are in line with the cation-π and bridge salt interactions found in the kinked base of the pembrolizumab β-bulge (AAs in magenta Figures 1D & 3E). In addition, the sheer broadness of the A4(Hβ) resonance (restricted conformational ensemble in slow equilibrium on the NMR timescale) and its significant CSD of ~ −0.84 ppm are evidence of a profound shielding interaction (Figure 3BC). This would be consistent with a close contact CH/π interaction between A4 and W17 that is otherwise supported by several strong long-range NOESY correlations between W17(Hζ3/η2) and A4(Hβ).(5456) The large CSD of A4(Hβ) was further observed across the entire series of bulge-like hairpins (Figure 3C). Whereas all alanine-derived motifs presented a similar chemical shift deviation of the A4Hβ signals (−0.74 to −0.88 ppm), the valine of 1h endured a greater shielding effect of 1.02 ppm in addition to the Hγ CSDs of −0.56 and −0.95 ppm. These results are consistent with a more compactly folded structure. In comparison, smaller CSDs were recorded for the A4(Hβ) resonances of a weakly folded hairpin 1k (−0.35 ppm) and the random coil 1j (vide supra CD section). Interestingly, the unfolded nature of 1j strongly suggests that a tryptophan at position 17 is essential for structuring the CDR-H3 mimics. Tryptophan side-chain NHε1 signals are typically sharp peaks resonating at 10.0–10.5 ppm. Those features were observed for both edge-to-face interacting tryptophans W2F/W19E within the strap segment of 1d, but the W17(Hε1) was hardly seen on 1H NMR spectra in the range of temperature studied (Figure 3D). Such abnormal peak broadening observed for the W17(Hε1) signal is a hallmark of interconverting conformers in a slow-exchange regime on the NMR time scale. Due to the emergence of this signal at low temperature, we can speculate that the W17 side chain is conformationally restricted by a weak intramolecular hydrogen bond. One possibility could be a hydrogen bond between W17 and F14 following the pattern observed in most crystal structures of bulged CDR-H3s (F(n-1):W(n+2), Figure 1D).

To further probe the stability and dynamic properties of these bulge-like hairpins, both amide-NH temperature coefficients (ΔδHN/ΔT) and hydrogen–deuterium exchange rates kHD were measured in 1d by NMR spectroscopy. H/D-exchange experiments can in principle probe both open and closed populated conformational states of hairpins in solution to help distinguish topologies between loop, strap, and kinked bulge-like sequences (SI, Figure S34 & Table S14).(57) The H/D-exchange experiment confirmed the presence of several strong H-bonds within the strap such as the pair of valines V3/V18 (kH/D<1.410-3min-1) and the terminal E20 residue (kH/D of 6.8•10−3 min−1). More interestingly, the amide kH/D value of 33.5•10−3 min−1 for the F14 bulge residue, although relatively rapid, remains in the expected range for a weak hydrogen bond. To confirm whether these backbone amides are involved in intramolecular hydrogen bonds, amide-HN temperature coefficients (ΔδHN/ΔT) were measured from variable temperature 1H NMR spectra (SI, Table S13). It is well established that solvent-protected and/or hydrogen-bonded amide protons typically have a ΔδHN/ΔT ≥ −4.6 ppb/K.(58) As anticipated from the H/D exchange rates, the temperature coefficients recorded for both V3/V18 (~ −15.2 ppb/K) and E20 (−6.0 ppb/K) are suggestive of weak H-bonds within the strap. The abnormally high temperature coefficients for the V3/V18 pair have been previously reported for amides transiently hydrogen-bonded among rapidly equilibrating conformers, thus suggesting that the acyclic hairpin 1d equilibrates between open and closed forms over the range of temperature studied.(5960) Furthermore, the amides-HN of R5 and F14 with ΔδHN/ΔT of −5.3 and −5.7 ppb/K respectively were also found to participate in weakly persisting hydrogen bonds. R5 at position 0 could form a hydrogen bond across the hairpin with D15(n) and/or Y16(n+1) consistent with a bulge-like structure. On the other hand, persistent backbone hydrogen bonding of F14(n-1) position may indicate residual structures in what may otherwise be assumed to be a disordered loop.

Finally, a 3D-conformational ensemble of hairpin 1d in solution at 298K was modeled based on NMR chemical shifts (1H, 13C, and 15N), NOESY correlations (including > 40 long-range interactions), and 3JHN-Hα backbone and 3JHα-Hβ sidechain coupling constants. Briefly, a large initial ensemble of 10 million plausible conformers was generated via simulated annealing with the CHARMM c36m force field followed by explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations under NOE and backbone torsion angle restraints (see SI). The initial ensemble was reduced to a subset of 60,000 stereochemically most ideal conformers. From these, 20 conformers were extracted within a maximum-entropy framework to obtain a maximal agreement between the model and the experimental ensemble-averaged NOE distances and J-coupling values (see SI). In this ensemble refinement process, conformer selection and assignment of weights were iteratively optimized to closely represent the true dynamic ensemble of the underlying experimental NMR data. It is readily apparent that the conformational ensemble (Figure 3E) consists of a highly ordered hairpin terminal β-strap, flanked by mostly kinked configurations that resemble the bulge conformations seen in the CDR-H3 structures, and a more disordered loop for the remaining residues. This allows the conclusion that our truncated CDR-H3 mimic 1d is a well-folded hairpin that retains the overall structural features seen in the crystal structures of antibodies. Yet, a more detailed analysis of specific features around the residues forming the β-bulge revealed some major differences (Figure 4). The classic β-bulge backbone hydrogen pattern is incomplete with the n:0 hydrogen bond present in only a subset of conformers (Figure 4A). Nevertheless, residues R5(0)/D15(n)/Y16(n+1) are on the same face of the hairpin and in close proximity, forming a kinked base as in CDR-H3 bulges. However, the R5:D15 salt bridge interaction was missing from all conformers. Instead, R5 is found bent over the hairpin strap to interact with the C-terminal E20. Because R5 is oriented away from D15, the cation-π interaction is also weakened in the hairpin ensemble (Figure 4A). CH/π contacts from W17(n+2) to F14(n-1) and A4(−1) are similarly close in about half of 1d conformers while the W17-NHε hydrogen bond to the F14 backbone carbonyl, consistent with the extended bulge architectures, is only present in some conformations. Instead, there is a close interaction within the loop between the F14 backbone carbonyl and the backbone amide of M12. This observation is consistent with the amide-HN temperature coefficient analysis described above that suggests that the F14 carbonyl is involved in hydrogen bonding. Overall, the distribution of backbone Ramachandran angles for the solution ensemble of 1d is relatively broad, indicating significant conformational dynamics (Figure 4B). Yet, the distributions are analogous to CDR-H3 structures and the values for pembrolizumab. Most notably, residues at positions n-1 and n sample the αLT and α-regions of the Ramachandran map forming the expected twisted conformation of bulges.

Figure 4. 3D-Features of the de novo CDR-H3 β-hairpin mimetic 1d (20-state ensemble).

Figure 4.

(A) Violin plots indicating the distribution of structural features as in Figure 1C for bulge-like residues within the CDR-H3 mimic. (B) Backbone Ramachandran analysis of kink residues. Values from the parental pembrolizumab (PDB: 5B8C) are indicated with ‘x’ marks and dot size reflects conformer weight.

Conclusion

Known CDR-H3 structures fall into tightly clustered kinked and extended conformations, with a kinked (C+) or (C−) bulge conformation around the consensus sequence ARloopFDYW being the most prominent motif. According to our analysis, the classic three-residues bulge definition (0,n,n-1) extends to a six-residue motif in CDR-H3s due to additional highly conserved and stabilizing non-covalent interactions between positions 1,n-1, and n-2. Presumably, the conserved six-residue motif provides the stability and versatility necessary to display a wide variety of loops adaptable to distinct antigens.

We demonstrate here that the key CDR-H3 motif can be synthetically crafted into short, yet stable standalone β-hairpin scaffolds that retain most structural features of the parental CDR-H3s outside the antibody context. The pH- and thermally-induced denaturation studies support the notion that the CDR-H3 mimics are intrinsically stable yet conformationally flexible, curbing the cooperativity between the β-sheet and loop segments to enhance the global hairpin stability. Our results also suggest that the presence of a bulge-like kinked structure can be identified via CD spectroscopy by a unique signature band at 202 ± 2 nm allowing for a rapid and general characterization of CDR-H3-like structures. The biomimetic A(−1)V substitution –naturally occurring in CDR-H3 sequences– yielded the most stable bulged-like β-hairpin 1h (Tm of 70 °C, 85%-folding at physiological temperature), which is significantly superior to the regular benchmark hairpin 1l.

A full characterization of the pembrolizumab mimic 1d by NMR spectroscopy revealed a structural ensemble with a rigid β-sheet stem and kinked bulge-like motif affording significant conformational flexibility towards the loop (PDB code: 8W0Q). In the NMR ensemble, the combination of strong CH/π interaction and weaker intramolecular hydrogen bond created by the W(n+2) side chain strongly suggest that this highly conserved residue is essential to the bulge architecture of the kinked CDR-H3 motifs. However, we also identify some differences between the NMR ensemble of 1d and the original pembrolizumab crystal structure such as the apparent lack of a salt bridge between R5 and D15. Differences due to the more dynamic nature of the stand-alone hairpin may be expected as the antibody framework certainly constrain the native CDR-H3 conformational space. The lack of NMR evidence characterizing the proximity of the R5:D15 interaction might be due to the dynamic nature of the conformational ensemble. Other reasons may be imparted by the synthetic construct 1d itself such as the terminal E20 residue interaction to R5. By replacing E20 by a non-acidic residue, it is conceivable that the R5:D15 salt bridge could be restored like in typical (C−) bulges. Further studies will be needed to fully understand how the detailed structure of CDR-H3 mimics may vary from their parental structures as a function of primary amino acid sequences.

The structural insights gained into CDR-H3 architectures represent an important step to assist the development of therapeutic antibodies and future loop designs for high-throughput screening by (phage- and mRNA-) display technologies. Given the uniqueness of CDR-H3 loops in ultra-long CDRs(61) and other broad neutralizing antibodies(62,63), we anticipate that having access to bulge-like CDR-H3 mimics of will greatly facilitate future structural studies, providing valuable tools to probe H3-loop rigidification and conformational dynamics in the context of antibody drug development.(64)

Supplementary Material

SI
SI data
SI ensemble

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We are grateful for the financial support from the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS Grant: R21GM132754 to S.P.R., G.Z., and A.D.R.; NIGMS Grant R35GM126948 to M.F.).

ABBREVIATIONS

Ag

antigen

Ab

antibody

CDR

Complementarity-determining region

CSD

chemical shift deviation

TOCSY

Total Correlation Spectroscopy

HSQC

Heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectroscopy

NOESY

Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectroscopy

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

Experimental procedures and analytical data for all β-hairpin peptides, details of structural studies (including variable temperature CD and NMR data, and H/D exchange) for hairpin 1d, and the computational modeling protocols are available online (PDF). Separate files contain the raw CD-data and denaturation curves (XLSX), and the data-derived 3D-structure ensemble of 1d (PDB code: 8W0Q).

REFERENCES

  • (1).Wedemayer GJ; Patten PA; Wang LH; Schultz PG; Stevens RC Structural Insights into the Evolution of an Antibody Combining Site. Science 1997, 276, 1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Khass M; Vale AM; Burrows PD; Schroeder HW Jr The sequences encoded by immunoglobulin diversity (DH) gene segments play key roles in controlling B-cell development, antigen-binding site diversity, and antibody production. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 284, 106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Glanville J; Zhai W; Berka J; Telman D; Huerta G; Mehta GR; Ni I; Mei L; Sundar PD; Day GMR; Cox D; Rajpal A; Pons J Precise determination of the diversity of a combinatorial antibody library gives insight into the human immunoglobulin repertoire. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009, 106, 20216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).(a) Wong SE; Sellers BD; Jacobson MP, Effects of somatic mutations on CDR loop flexibility during affinity maturation. Proteins 2011, 79, 821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Schmidt AG; Xu H; Khan AR; O’Donnell T; Khurana S; King LR; Manischewitz J; Golding H; Suphaphiphat P; Carfi A; Settembre EC; Dormitzer PR; Kepler TB; Zhang R; Moody MA; Haynes BF; Liao H-X; Shaw DE; Harrison SC, Preconfiguration of the antigen-binding site during affinity maturation of a broadly neutralizing influenza virus antibody. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013, 110, 264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Klein F; Diskin R; Scheid Johannes F.; Gaebler C; Mouquet H; Georgiev IS; Pancera M; Zhou T; Incesu R-B; Fu Brooks Z.; Gnanapragasam Priyanthi N. P.; Oliveira Thiago Y.; Seaman Michael S.; Kwong Peter D.; Bjorkman Pamela J.; Nussenzweig Michel C., Somatic Mutations of the Immunoglobulin Framework Are Generally Required for Broad and Potent HIV-1 Neutralization. Cell 2013, 153, 126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).(a) DeKosky BJ; Lungu OI; Park D; Johnson EL; Charab W; Chrysostomou C; Kuroda D; Ellington AD; Ippolito GC; Gray JJ; Georgiou G Large-scale sequence and structural comparisons of human naive and antigen-experienced antibody repertoires. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016, 113, E2636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Jeliazkov JR; Sljoka A; Kuroda D; Tsuchimura N; Katoh N; Tsumoto K; Gray JJ Repertoire Analysis of Antibody CDR-H3 Loops Suggests Affinity Maturation Does Not Typically Result in Rigidification. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Yin J; Mundorff EC; Yang PL; Wendt KU; Hanway D; Stevens RC; Schultz PG A Comparative Analysis of the Immunological Evolution of Antibody 28B4. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 10764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Bozhanova NG; Sangha AK; Sevy AM; Gilchuk P; Huang K; Nargi RS; Reidy JX; Trivette A; Carnahan RH; Bukreyev A; Crowe JE; Meiler J Discovery of Marburg virus neutralizing antibodies from virus-naïve human antibody repertoires using large-scale structural predictions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020, 117, 31142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Fernández-Quintero ML; Loeffler JR; Bacher LM; Waibl F; Seidler CA; Liedl KR Local and Global Rigidification Upon Antibody Affinity Maturation. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Vajda S; Porter KA; Kozakov D, Progress toward improved understanding of antibody maturation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2021, 67, 226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Favre M; Moehle K; Jiang L; Pfeiffer B; Robinson JA, Structural Mimicry of Canonical Conformations in Antibody Hypervariable Loops Using Cyclic Peptides Containing a Heterochiral Diproline Template. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2679. [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Decanniere K; Muyldermans S; Wyns L, Canonical antigen-binding loop structures in immunoglobulins: more structures, more canonical classes? J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300, 83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).North B; Lehmann A; Dunbrack RL, A New Clustering of Antibody CDR Loop Conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 406, 228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Chang H-J; Jian J-W; Hsu H-J; Lee Y-C; Chen H-S; You J-J; Hou S-C; Shao C-Y; Chen Y-J; Chiu K-P; Peng H-P; Lee Kuo H.; Yang A-S Loop-Sequence Features and Stability Determinants in Antibody Variable Domains by High-Throughput Experiments. Structure 2014, 22, 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Breden F; Lepik C; Longo NS; Montero M; Lipsky PE; Scott JK Comparison of Antibody Repertoires Produced by HIV-1 Infection, Other Chronic and Acute Infections, and Systemic Autoimmune Disease. PLOS ONE 2011, 6, e16857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Chothia C; Lesk AM; Tramontano A; Levitt M; Smith-Gill SJ; Air G; Sheriff S; Padlan EA; Davies D; Tulip WR; Colman PM; Spinelli S; Alzari PM; Poljak RJ, Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature 1989, 342, 877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Wong WK; Leem J; Deane CM Comparative Analysis of the CDR Loops of Antigen Receptors. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).(a) Sela-Culang I; Alon S; Ofran Y A Systematic Comparison of Free and Bound Antibodies Reveals Binding-Related Conformational Changes. J. Immunol.2012, 189, 4890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Fernández-Quintero ML; Loeffler JR; Kraml J; Kahler U; Kamenik AS; Liedl KR Characterizing the Diversity of the CDR-H3 Loop Conformational Ensembles in Relationship to Antibody Binding Properties. Front. Immunol. 2019, 9, 3065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Kado Y; Mizohata E; Nagatoishi S; Iijima M; Shinoda K; Miyafusa T; Nakayama T; Yoshizumi T; Sugiyama A; Kawamura T; Lee Y-H; Matsumura H; Doi H; Fujitani H; Kodama T; Shibasaki Y; Tsumoto K; Inoue T Epiregulin Recognition Mechanisms by Anti-epiregulin Antibody 9E5. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 2319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Kunik V; Ofran Y The indistinguishability of epitopes from protein surface is explained by the distinct binding preferences of each of the six antigen-binding loops. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2013, 26, 599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).(a) Kuroda D; Shirai H; Jacobson MP; Nakamura H Computer-aided antibody design. Prot. Eng. Des. Sel. 2012, 25, 507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Tsuchiya Y; Mizuguchi K The diversity of H3 loops determines the antigen-binding tendencies of antibody CDR loops. Protein Sci.2016, 25, 815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Fernández-Quintero ML; Kraml J; Georges G; Liedl KR CDR-H3 loop ensemble in solution – conformational selection upon antibody binding. mAbs 2019, 11, 1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Weitzner BD; Kuroda D; Marze N; Xu J; Gray JJ Blind prediction performance of RosettaAntibody 3.0: Grafting, relaxation, kinematic loop modeling, and full CDR optimization. Proteins. 2014, 82, 1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Sevy AM; Meiler J Antibodies: Computer-Aided Prediction of Structure and Design of Function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Weitzner BD; Dunbrack RL; Gray JJ The Origin of CDR H3 Structural Diversity. Structure 2015, 23, 302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Finn JA; Koehler Leman J; Willis JR; Cisneros A III; Crowe JE Jr.; Meiler J Improving Loop Modeling of the Antibody Complementarity-Determining Region 3 Using Knowledge-Based Restraints. PLOS ONE 2016, 11, e0154811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Marks C; Deane CM Antibody H3 Structure Prediction. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).(a) Shirai H; Kidera A; Nakamura H Structural classification of CDR-H3 in antibodies. FEBS Lett. 1996, 399, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Morea V; Tramontano A; Rustici M; Chothia C; Lesk AM Conformations of the third hypervariable region in the VH domain of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 275, 269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Shirai H; Kidera A; Nakamura H, H3-rules: identification of CDR-H3 structures in antibodies. FEBS Lett. 1999, 455, 188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).(a) Richardson JS; Getzoff ED; Richardson DC The beta bulge: a common small unit of nonrepetitive protein structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1978, 75, 2574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Chan AWE; Hutchinson EG; Harris D; Thornton JM Identification, classification, and analysis of beta-bulges in proteins. Protein Sci. 1993, 2, 1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Craveur P; Joseph AP; Rebehmed J; de Brevern AG β-Bulges: Extensive structural analyses of β-sheets irregularities. Protein Sci. 2013, 22, 1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).(a) Tynan FE; Reid HH; Kjer-Nielsen L; Miles JJ; Wilce MCJ; Kostenko L; Borg NA; Williamson NA; Beddoe T; Purcell AW; Burrows SR; McCluskey J; Rossjohn J A T cell receptor flattens a bulged antigenic peptide presented by a major histocompatibility complex class I molecule. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Capraro DT; Roy M; Onuchic JN; Gosavi S; Jennings PA, β-Bulge triggers route-switching on the functional landscape of interleukin-1β. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012, 109, 1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Bahrami Dizicheh Z; Chen IL; Koenig P, VHH CDR-H3 conformation is determined by VH germline usage. Commun. Biol. 2023, 6, 864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Hollingsworth SA; Karplus PA A fresh look at the Ramachandran plot and the occurrence of standard structures in proteins. BioMol. Concepts. 2010, 1, 271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Porter LL; Rose GD Redrawing the Ramachandran plot after inclusion of hydrogen-bonding constraints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011, 108, 109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Dhar J; Kishore R; Chakrabarti P A novel secondary structure based on fused five-membered rings motif. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Dhar J; Kishore R; Chakrabarti P, Delineation of a new structural motif involving NHN γ-turn. Proteins. 2020, 88, 431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Salonen LM; Ellermann M; Diederich F Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Anderson JM; Kier BL; Shcherbakov AA; Andersen NH An improved capping unit for stabilizing the ends of associated β-strands. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 4749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Richaud AD; Zhao G; Hobloss S; Roche SP Folding in Place: Design of β-Strap Motifs to Stabilize the Folding of Hairpins with Long Loops. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 13535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Cochran AG; Skelton NJ; Starovasnik MA Tryptophan zippers: Stable, monomeric β-hairpins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001, 98, 5578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Anderson JM; Kier BL; Jurban B; Byrne A; Shu I; Eidenschink LA; Shcherbakov AA; Hudson M; Fesinmeyer RM; Andersen NH Aryl–aryl interactions in designed peptide folds: Spectroscopic characteristics and optimal placement for structure stabilization. Biopolymers 2016, 105, 337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Micsonai A; Wien F; Kernya L; Lee Y-H; Goto Y; Réfrégiers M; Kardos J Accurate secondary structure prediction and fold recognition for circular dichroism spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015, 112, E3095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Greenfield NJ Using circular dichroism collected as a function of temperature to determine the thermodynamics of protein unfolding and binding interactions. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Anderson JM; Andersen NH A pH Switch for β-Sheet Protein Folding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Meyer EA; Castellano RK; Diederich F Interactions with Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).(a) Tatko CD; Waters ML, Comparison of C–H···π and Hydrophobic Interactions in a β-Hairpin Peptide:  Impact on Stability and Specificity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Ghosh P; Chatterjee J, CH–π interaction between cross-strand amino acid pairs stabilizes β-hairpins. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 14447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Richaud AD; Mandal S; Das A; Roche SP Tunable CH/π Interactions within a Tryptophan Zipper Motif to Stabilize the Fold of Long β-Hairpin Peptides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2023, 18, 2555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Persson F; Halle B How amide hydrogens exchange in native proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015, 112, 10383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Wang CK; Northfield SE; Colless B; Chaousis S; Hamernig I; Lohman R-J; Nielsen DS; Schroeder CI; Liras S; Price DA; Fairlie DP; Craik DJ Rational design and synthesis of an orally bioavailable peptide guided by NMR amide temperature coefficients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014, 111, 17504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Andersen NH; Chen C; Marschner TM; Krystek SR; Bassolino DA Conformational isomerism of endothelin in acidic aqueous media: a quantitative NOESY analysis. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Baxter NJ; Williamson MP Temperature dependence of 1H chemical shifts in proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 1997, 9, 359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Svilenov HL; Sacherl J; Protzer U; Zacharias M; Buchner J Mechanistic principles of an ultra-long bovine CDR reveal strategies for antibody design. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (62).(a) Willis JR; Finn JA; Briney B; Sapparapu G; Singh V; King H; LaBranche CC; Montefiori DC; Meiler J; Crowe JE Long antibody HCDR3s from HIV-naïve donors presented on a PG9 neutralizing antibody background mediate HIV neutralization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016, 113, 4446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Sok D; Burton DR Recent progress in broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Misson Mindrebo L; Liu H; Ozorowski G; Tran Q; Woehl J; Khalek I; Smith Jessica M.; Barman S; Zhao F; Keating C; Limbo O; Verma M; Liu J; Stanfield RL; Zhu X; Turner HL; Sok D; Huang P-S; Burton DR; Ward AB; Wilson IA; Jardine JG Fully synthetic platform to rapidly generate tetravalent bispecific nanobody–based immunoglobulins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2023, 120, e2216612120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI
SI data
SI ensemble

RESOURCES