Skip to main content
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology logoLink to Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
. 2024 Aug 6;9(4):e1317. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1317

Factors associated with total laryngectomy following organ‐preserving treatment of laryngeal SCC

Mitchell T Victor 1,2, Farhoud Faraji 3,4, Rohith Voora 3, Sandhya Kalavacherla 1, Loren K Mell 4,5, Brent S Rose 5,6, Theresa W Guo 3,4,
PMCID: PMC11301822  PMID: 39108948

Abstract

Objective(s)

A subset of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) patients undergoing larynx preserving treatment ultimately require total laryngectomy (TL) for oncologic or functional reasons. This study aims to identify TL risk factors in these patients.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study using Veterans Affairs (VA) database. T1–T4 LSCC cases treated with primary radiotherapy (XRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were assessed for TL and recurrence. Binary logistic and Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses were implemented.

Results

Of 5390 cases, 863 (16.0%) underwent TL. On multivariable analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio: 0.97 [0.96–0.98]; p < .001) and N3 disease (0.42 [0.18–1.00]; p = .050) were associated with reduced risk of TL, whereas current alcohol use (1.22 [1.04–1.43]; p = .015) and >T1 disease (T2, 1.76 [1.44–2.17]; p < .001; T3, 2.06 [1.58–2.68]; p < .001; T4, 1.79 [1.26–2.53]; p = .001) were associated with increased risk of TL. However, N2 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.30 [1.10–1.55]; p = .003) and N3 (2.02 [1.25–3.26]; p = .004) disease were associated with an increased risk for local recurrence. Compared to XRT, treatment with CRT was associated with reduced risk for local recurrence after adjusting for other factors (0.84 [0.70–0.99]; p = .044). Those who do not receive TL following local recurrence have poorer disease‐specific survival (log‐rank, p < .001). In patients without local recurrence, N2 disease was associated with a fourfold increase in risk of TL (4.24 [1.83–9.82]; p < .001).

Conclusion

Advanced nodal stage was associated with reduced rates of salvage TL in the setting of local recurrence, and subsequent worse prognosis after recurrence. Conversely, advanced nodal stage may increase the risk for functional salvage TL in patients without recurrence.

Level of Evidence

Level 3.

Keywords: laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, larynx preservation, salvage laryngectomy, recurrence, Veterans Affairs


This study uses a Veterans Affairs database to identify total laryngectomy (TL) risk factors in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with upfront organ preservation. T category and N category were found to be associated with both local recurrence and salvage TL. Advanced nodal stage at diagnosis was associated with reduced rates of salvage TL and worse prognosis after recurrence.

graphic file with name LIO2-9-e1317-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

The Veterans Affairs (VA) study, published in 1991, provided some of the first randomized data to support the treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation rather than laryngectomy. 1 Subsequently, Forastiere et al. demonstrated that in locally advanced LSCC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) delivered superior locoregional control and laryngectomy‐free survival compared to induction chemotherapy with radiation or radiation alone (XRT). 2

Nevertheless, in practice, an estimated 16%–36% of patients with advanced LSCC treated with laryngeal preservation (LP) will ultimately receive a total laryngectomy (TL), either for local disease recurrence or functional indications, underscoring the need for identification of risk factors for TL following LP. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 To date, few clinical features have been associated with TL following curative‐intent treatment with LP in patients with moderately advanced LSCC. 8 LP is often favored for possibility of voice and speech retention without permanent stoma along with improved quality of life. 9 , 10 However, LSCC patients treated with LP may experience high‐grade dysphagia, aspiration, and need for future tracheostomy. 11 T4 patients are at particularly high risk, and some literature supports the use of primary laryngectomy in these patients over CRT/XRT. 11 , 12 In post‐CRT LSCC patients undergoing surgical salvage, the rate of major complications is as high as 54%. 13 Therefore, it is essential for providers to identify patients with risk factors for salvage TL following initial LP to inform shared decision‐making and guide treatment.

In this study, we aimed to use a VA database to identify risk factors for receipt of salvage TL following larynx‐preserving treatment in patients with LSCC.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Previously published data from the VA national database were interrogated with approval by the Research and Development Committee of the VA San Diego Healthcare System. 14 , 15 , 16 Inclusion criteria were LSCC, T category ≥1 to include early and advanced disease, and initial nonsurgical definitive treatment with either primary CRT or XRT. Exclusion criteria were in situ disease, distant metastases at diagnosis, missing staging or treatment information, or age under 18. For TNM staging, cases were coded using the AJCC 8th edition Cancer Staging Manual. 17 Pathological staging data superseded clinical staging data when available. All reported staging data refers to the original disease stage as opposed to that at recurrence. Anatomic subsite was discretely coded as either “glottis,” “supraglottis,” “subglottis,” “larynx, NOS,” or “larynx, overlapping.”

Clinical, demographic, and treatment variables were compared between cases that received TL (TL+) and those that did not (TL−) using descriptive statistics (chi‐squared for categorical variables and two‐sided T test or Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables). Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models were generated to identify factors associated with receipt of TL following definitive nonsurgical treatment. Similarly, Cox proportional hazards regression models were generated to identify factors associated with local recurrence, defined as recurrence at the larynx or tissue adjacent to the primary tumor site. Time to local recurrence was set as the time between date of diagnosis and date of local recurrence. Cases were censored at time of either last contact or death. For regression analyses, covariates with p < .100 on univariable analysis were included in a multivariable model generated using a backward conditional method whereby variables with p > .100 were removed at each step. Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier analyses and log‐rank tests were performed to analyze differences in overall survival based on receipt of TL. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.29.0.2.0. 18

3. RESULTS

3.1. Analysis of risk factors for salvage TL in a VA database

A total of 5390 patients from the VA database met inclusion criteria. Of those, 863 (16.0%) received subsequent TL (Table 1). Mean age at diagnosis was 63.0 years in TL+ cases versus 65.7 in TL− cases (two‐sided T test, p < .001). The median duration of follow‐up among all cases was 3.0 years (interquartile range: 1.3–5.8) and did not vary by receipt of TL (independent samples median test, p = .366). Of the patients who received TL, 96.8% had local disease recurrence. Among cases with local recurrence, rates of distant recurrence did not differ by receipt of TL (1.2% vs. 1.5%, χ2 p = .640), whereas regional recurrence was more common in TL+ cases (11.7% vs. 4.5%, p < .001).

TABLE 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated with organ preservation.

n (%) TL+ TL−
5390 (100) 863 (16.0) 4527 (84.0) p
Age at diagnosis, mean (SD) 65.3 (9.0) 63.0 (8.3) 65.7 (9.1) <.001
Length of follow up, median, years [IQR] 3.0 [1.3–5.8] 3.1 [1.6–5.8] 2.9 [1.2–5.8] .366
Sex
Male 5339 (99.1) 858 (99.5) 4481 (99.0) .146
Female 48 (0.9) 4 (0.5) 44 (1.0)
Race
White 4210 (79.0) 672 (78.0) 3538 (79.1) .116
Black 1075 (20.2) 186 (21.6) 889 (19.9)
Other 46 (0.9) 3 (0.3) 43 (1.0)
Charlson–Deyo score
0 2049 (38.1) 355 (41.1) 1694 (37.4) .110
1 670 (12.4) 98 (11.4) 572 (12.6)
≥2 2668 (49.5) 410 (47.5) 2258 (49.9)
Tobacco history
Past/never 2150 (39.9) 317 (36.7) 1833 (40.5) .039
Current 3240 (60.1) 546 (63.3) 2694 (59.5)
Alcohol history
Past/never 2409 (51.0) 339 (44.8) 2070 (52.2) <.001
Current 2313 (49.0) 417 (55.2) 1896 (47.8)
Primary site
Glottis 3229 (59.9) 502 (58.2) 2727 (60.2) .330
Supraglottis 1776 (32.9) 286 (33.1) 1490 (32.9)
Subglottis 57 (1.1) 12 (1.4) 45 (1.0)
Larynx, NOS 235 (4.4) 43 (5.0) 192 (4.2)
Larynx, overlapping 93 (1.7) 20 (2.3) 73 (1.6)
T category
1 2089 (38.8) 249 (28.9) 1840 (40.6) <.001
2 1627 (30.2) 300 (34.8) 1327 (29.3)
3 1238 (23.0) 238 (27.6) 1000 (22.1)
4 436 (8.1) 76 (8.8) 360 (8.0)
N category
0 3965 (73.6) 632 (73.2) 3333 (73.6) .261
1 365 (6.8) 64 (7.4) 301 (6.6)
2 987 (18.3) 161 (18.7) 826 (18.2)
3 73 (1.4) 6 (0.7) 67 (1.5)
Stage
1 2119 (39.3) 262 (30.4) 1857 (41.0) <.001
2 1175 (21.8) 233 (27.0) 942 (20.8)
3 817 (15.2) 152 (17.6) 665 (14.7)
4A 1206 (22.4) 210 (24.3) 996 (22.0)
4B 73 (1.4) 6 (0.7) 67 (1.5)
Treatment modality
XRT 3299 (61.2) 496 (57.5) 2803 (61.9) .014
CRT 2091 (38.8) 367 (42.5) 1724 (38.1)
Any recurrence
Yes 1380 (25.6) 863 (100) 517 (11.4) <.001
No 4010 (74.4) 0 (0.0) 4010 (88.6)
Local recurrence
Yes 1300 (24.1) 835 (96.8) 465 (10.3) <.001
No 4090 (75.9) 28 (3.2) 4062 (89.7)
Regional recurrence
Yes 190 (3.5) 123 (14.3) 67 (1.5) <.001
No 5200 (96.5) 740 (85.7) 4460 (98.5)
Distant recurrence
Yes 33 (0.6) 14 (1.6) 19 (0.4) <.001
No 5357 (99.4) 894 (98.4) 4508 (99.6)

Bolded values are p values <0.05, denoting significance.

Abbreviations: CRT, chemoradiotherapy; IQR, interquartile range; TL, total laryngectomy; XRT, radiotherapy.

Age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.97 [0.96–0.98]; p < .001) and N3 disease (0.42 [0.18–1.00]; p = .050) were associated with a reduced risk for TL after adjusting for alcohol history, T category, and treatment modality (Table 2). Primary treatment modality of CRT trended toward an associated with reduced risk for receipt of TL (p = .073) after adjusting for other factors. Current alcohol use (1.22 [1.04–1.43]; p = .015) was associated with increased risk for TL on multivariable analysis, as was T category >T1 (T2, 1.76 [1.44–2.17]; p < .001; T3, 2.06 [1.58–2.68]; p < .001; T4, 1.79 [1.26–2.53]; p = .001).

TABLE 2.

Binary logistic regression, factors associated with total laryngectomy amongst cases treated with CRT or XRT.

Univariate Multivariate
n = 5390 OR (95% CI) p aOR a (95% CI) p
Age at diagnosis 5390 0.97 (0.96–0.97) <.001 0.97 (0.96–0.98) <.001
Sex, n
Male 5339 Ref
Female 48 0.48 (0.17–1.33) .155
Race, n (%)
White 4210 Ref
Black 1075 1.10 (0.92–1.32) .288
Other 46 0.37 (0.11–1.19) .094
Charlson–Deyo score
0 2049 Ref
1 670 0.82 (0.64–1.04) .104
≥2 2668 0.87 (0.74–1.01) .071
Tobacco history
Past/never 2150 Ref
Current 3240 1.17 (1.01–1.36) .039
Alcohol history
Past/never 2409 Ref Ref
Current 2313 1.34 (1.15–1.57) <.001 1.22 (1.04–1.43) .015
Primary site
Glottis 3229 Ref
Supraglottis 1776 1.04 (0.89–1.22) .605
Subglottis 57 1.45 (0.76–2.76) .259
Larynx, NOS 235 1.22 (0.86–1.72) .264
Larynx, overlapping 93 1.49 (0.90–2.46) .122
T category
1 2089 Ref Ref
2 1627 1.67 (1.39–2.01) <.001 1.76 (1.44–2.17) <.001
3 1238 1.76 (1.45–2.13) <.001 2.06 (1.58–2.68) <.001
4 436 1.56 (1.18–2.07) .002 1.79 (1.26–2.53) .001
N category
0 3965 Ref Ref
1 365 1.12 (0.85–1.49) .428 0.89 (0.65–1.23) .483
2 987 1.03 (0.85–1.24) .775 0.80 (0.63–1.01) .058
3 73 0.47 (0.20–1.09) .080 0.42 (0.18–1.00) .050
Treatment modality 0
XRT 3299 Ref Ref
CRT 2091 1.20 (1.04–1.39) .014 0.81 (0.65–1.02) .073

Bolded values are p values <0.05, denoting significance.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; OR, odds ratio; XRT, radiotherapy.

a

Adjusted for age, alcohol history, T category, N category, and treatment modality.

3.2. Factors associated with local recurrence

Given that 96% of patients who received TL experienced local recurrence, we then performed Cox regression analyses to assess for factors associated with local recurrence. Local disease recurrence occurred in 24.1% of all cases. Compared to T1 disease, T2 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.69 [1.45–1.98]; p < .001), T3 (1.94 [1.58–2.37]; p < .001), and T4 (2.25 [1.75–2.90]; p < .001) disease were each independently associated with increased risk of local recurrence after adjusting for age, race, N category, and treatment modality (Table 3; Figure 1A). Median times from diagnosis to local recurrence in T1–T4 patients were: 15, 13, 12, and 11 months, respectively (p < .001, independent samples median test). Compared to N0 disease, N2 (1.30 [1.10–1.55]; p = .003) and N3 (2.02 [1.25–3.26]; p = .004) disease were also associated with increased risk for local recurrence on multivariable analysis (Figure 1B). Median times to local recurrence in N0‐N3 patients were: 14, 12, 12, and 7 months, respectively (p < .001, independent samples median test). After adjusting for disease stage, age, and race, CRT was also associated with decreased risk for local recurrence compared to XRT (aHR: 0.84 [0.70–0.99]; p = .044).

TABLE 3.

Cox regression for factors predictive of time to local disease recurrence in XRT and CRT cases.

Univariate Multivariate
n = 5390 HR (95% CI) p aHR a (95% CI) p
Age at diagnosis, years, mean (SD) 5390 0.98 (0.97–0.99) <.001 0.99 (0.98–0.99) <.001
Sex
Male 5313 Ref
Female 48 0.53 (0.24–1.17) .116
Race
White 4191 Ref Ref
Black 1069 1.14 (0.99–1.30) .061 1.09 (0.94–1.26) .241
Other 46 0.47 (0.20–1.14) .096 0.43 (0.16–1.14) .090
Charlson–Deyo score
0 2036 Ref
1 667 0.86 (0.72–1.04) .117
≥2 2658 0.91 (0.81–1.02) .114
Tobacco history
Past/never 2139 Ref
Current 3225 1.13 (1.01–1.26) .037
Alcohol history
Past/never 2395 Ref
Current 2305 1.12 (1.00–1.26) .055
Primary site
Glottis 3210 Ref
Supraglottis 1769 1.28 (1.14–1.44) <.001
Subglottis 57 1.38 (0.87–2.21) .175
Larynx, NOS 235 1.45 (1.12–1.88) .005
Larynx, overlapping 93 1.50 (1.03–2.19) .036
T category
1 2075 Ref Ref
2 1620 1.71 (1.49–1.95) <.001 1.69 (1.45–1.98) <.001
3 1234 1.91 (1.65–2.21) <.001 1.94 (1.58–2.37) <.001
4 435 2.36 (1.93–2.89) <.001 2.25 (1.75–2.90) <.001
N category
0 3942 Ref
1 364 1.39 (1.12–1.71) .002 1.10 (0.86–1.40) .449
2 985 1.59 (1.37–1.80) <.001 1.30 (1.10–1.55) .003
3 73 2.35 (1.49–3.70) <.001 2.02 (1.25–3.26) .004
Treatment modality
XRT 3281 Ref Ref
CRT 2083 1.47 (1.31–1.64) <.001 0.84 (0.70–0.99) .044

Bolded values are p values <0.05, denoting significance.

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; HR, hazard ratio; XRT, radiotherapy.

a

Adjusted for age, race, T category, N category, and treatment modality.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Local disease recurrence by (A) T category and (B) N category at time of diagnosis.

3.3. Salvage laryngectomy following local recurrence versus non‐oncologic laryngectomy

Given that N2–3 disease was associated with increased risk of local recurrence but decreased risk of TL, we separately investigated receipt of TL in patients with or without local recurrence to distinguish between true salvage laryngectomy and laryngectomy for nononcologic indications (i.e., functional TL). Local recurrence occurred in 96.8% of TL+ patients, whereas the remaining 3.2% of TL+ patients received TL for nononcologic indications. In N0 cases with local recurrence, 6.5% had concurrent regional recurrence, compared to 14.4% of N1 cases, 15.5% of N2 cases, and 21.1% of N3 cases (χ 2, p < .001). Rates of distant recurrence only differed significantly between N1 (4.1%) and N0 (0.9%) cases (p = .043). Among patients with local recurrence, rates of distant recurrence were not significantly greater in TL− patients compared to TL+ patients, regardless of N stage (N0, 1.0% [TL−] vs. 0.8% [TL+]; N1, 5.9 vs. 3.2; N2, 1.6 vs. 2.0; N3, 0.0 vs. 0.0; χ 2, p > .5 for each comparison).

In those with local recurrence, T category was again associated with increased odds of salvage TL and N category was associated with reduced odds of TL, after adjusting for age, alcohol history, and treatment modality (Table 4). Of N2 and N3 cases with local recurrence, 54.2% and 26.3% each received TL, in comparison to 67.9% of N0 cases with recurrence. Notably, patients with local recurrence who did not receive salvage TL experienced worse overall survival compared to those who received salvage TL surgery (log‐rank, p < .001, Figure 2). Concordantly, patients with advanced nodal disease experienced worse survival following local recurrence (log‐rank, p < .001, Supplemental Figure 1).

TABLE 4.

Binary logistic regression, factors associated with total laryngectomy (TL) based on local recurrence.

Local recurrence Yes (salvage TL) No (functional TL)
aOR a (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Age at diagnosis 0.99 (0.97–1.00) .066
Alcohol history
Past/never Ref
Current 1.48 (1.15–1.90) .002
T category
1 Ref
2 1.46 (1.06–2.03) .023
3 2.16 (1.41–3.30) <.001
4 1.38 (0.82–2.31) .222
N category
0 Ref Ref
1 0.84 (0.51–1.41) .516 1.01 (0.13–7.85) .993
2 0.50 (0.35–0.72) <.001 4.24 (1.83–9.82) <.001
3 0.20 (0.07–0.60) .004 4.90 (0.62–38.70) .132
Treatment modality
XRT Ref
CRT 0.72 (0.50–1.03) .074

Bolded values are p values <0.05, denoting significance.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; OR, odds ratio; XRT, radiotherapy.

a

Adjusted for age, alcohol history, T category, N category, and treatment modality.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Disease‐specific survival amongst cases with local recurrence based on receipt of salvage TL. TL, total laryngectomy.

In patients without local recurrence, N2 disease was associated with increased risk for TL compared to N0 disease (4.24 [1.83–9.82]; p < .001). Neither T category, age, nor treatment modality was associated with TL after adjusting for N category. Of the 4090 cases that did not experience local recurrence, 28 were reported to receive TL within the follow‐up period (0.7%).

4. DISCUSSION

In this study of LSCC patients treated with LP, advanced nodal disease was found to be independently associated with reduced rates of salvage TL despite an increased rate of local recurrence. The discrepancy between rates of salvage TL and local recurrence in patients with advanced nodal disease highlights the risk for aggressive recurrent disease, which may not be amenable to surgical salvage at the time of recurrence. As has been previously reported advanced T category was associated with increased risk for both local recurrence and subsequent salvage TL. In patients without local recurrence, advanced nodal stage was associated with receipt of TL.

Nodal disease is well known to portend poor prognosis in laryngeal cancer. Within this VA database cohort, 47.6% of laryngeal cancer patients with advanced nodal disease did not receive salvage surgery despite the presence of local recurrence. The specific reasons that patients did not receive salvage laryngectomy for local recurrence were not available for analysis; however, rates of distant disease were not higher in the non‐laryngectomy cohort. Other factors, including resectability of locoregional disease recurrence, patient acceptance, and extent of prior treatment toxicity, were not able to be evaluated within this database and could contribute to the lower rates of salvage laryngectomy. Patients who initially present with advanced nodal disease in laryngeal cancer may also have other factors precluding early diagnosis of disease that make them poor salvage surgery candidates such as medical comorbidities or lack of social support.

In all patients who undergo salvage laryngectomy, complication rates are high. 19 Incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistula following salvage TL is between 21.7% and 28.9%, and rate of any complication may be as high as 67.5%. 4 , 20 However, primary CRT has been shown to independently predict local complications and pharyngocutaneous fistula following TL when compared to either primary TL or primary XRT. 21 Furthermore, multiple authors report increased postoperative complications in patients who undergo salvage surgery closer to completion of CRT or XRT, potentially due to poorer nutritional and immune status. 19 , 21 , 22 Here, we also demonstrate that advanced nodal disease at diagnosis is associated with decreased time to local recurrence following organ‐preserving treatment, providing additional rationale for why providers may be less likely to offer these patients salvage laryngectomy following recurrence.

A small minority of patients without local recurrence received TL for nononcologic indications. Functional laryngectomies may be performed to improve patient quality of life in the absence of recurrent disease including chronic aspiration, dyspnea, and dysphagia. 7 , 23 In those without local recurrence, N2 category was associated with a four‐fold increased risk for TL; N3 disease has demonstrated a similar risk for TL, but this was likely underpowered within few cases of functional TL in this cohort. It is well‐established that radiation dose and volume to the larynx and adjacent tissues influence functional outcomes such as speech and swallow. 23 , 24 Patients with advanced nodal disease receive more aggressive treatment and wider neck radiation fields that likely contribute to worse functional outcomes, that may ultimately necessitate TL for nononcologic reasons. In RTOG 91–11, 5% of TLs following organ‐preservation treatment were for either “laryngeal dysfunction” or “necrosis,” comparable to the 3.2% of patients in this study who received TL for nononcologic indications. 4

Tobacco and alcohol history are important prognostic factors for survival in head and neck cancer. 25 , 26 , 27 Herein, we report that current alcohol, but not tobacco use, increases the risk of salvage TL in these patients, though neither risk factor was significantly associated with local recurrence after adjusting for disease stage. In contrast, Colasanto et al. report that heavy tobacco uses, and not alcohol use, correlate with local recurrence in LSCC treated with primary XRT. 28 Our study is limited by its dichotomization of both alcohol and tobacco use, which precludes a more granular analysis.

The presented risk factors for TL following initial LP treatment may assist in patient education and decision‐making. Receipt of TL after larynx preservation treatment is influenced by risk for local recurrence as well as factors at the time of recurrence that determine whether salvage laryngectomy is ultimately performed. In RTOG 91–11, concurrent CRT significantly improved larynx preservation compared to induction chemotherapy with radiation or radiation alone. 4 In this study, the VA database also recapitulates strong trends between CRT and reduced risk for salvage TL and local recurrence. However, patients with advanced nodal disease may be at risk for unresectable recurrences either due to tumors or patient factors. 4 , 29 , 30

Ultimately, patients with advanced nodal disease are at higher risk for local recurrence and experience lower rates of salvage TL, resulting in decreased cancer‐related survival after recurrence. Future studies may examine the factors contributing to reasons that salvage laryngectomy are not performed in the setting of local recurrence which contribute to significantly worse survival, particularly in laryngeal cancer patients with advanced nodal disease.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supplemental Figure 1: Disease‐specific survival among cases with local recurrence based on N category at diagnosis.

LIO2-9-e1317-s001.pdf (4.1KB, pdf)

Victor MT, Faraji F, Voora R, et al. Factors associated with total laryngectomy following organ‐preserving treatment of laryngeal SCC . Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 2024;9(4):e1317. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1317

This study was presented at the American Head and Neck Society Annual Meeting on July 12, 2023 in Montreal, QC, Canada.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wolf GT, Fisher SG, Hong WK, et al. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(24):1685‐1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2091‐2098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Silverman DA, Puram SV, Rocco JW, Old MO, Kang SY. Salvage laryngectomy following organ‐preservation therapy—an evidence‐based review. Oral Oncol. 2019;88:137‐144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Weber RS, Berkey BA, Forastiere A, et al. Outcome of salvage total laryngectomy following organ preservation therapy: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 91‐11. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(1):44‐49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dietz A, Wiegand S, Kuhnt T, Wichmann G. Laryngeal preservation approaches: considerations for new selection criteria based on the DeLOS‐II trial. Front Oncol. 2019;9:625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wichmann G, Krüger A, Boehm A, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy for larynx preservation in advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: outcome prediction after one cycle induction chemotherapy by a score based on clinical evaluation, computed tomography‐based volumetry and (18)F‐FDG‐PET/CT. Eur J Cancer. 2017;72:144‐155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Olinde L, Evangelista L, Bewley AF. Functional laryngectomy for the dysfunctional larynx: indications and outcomes in setting of prior chemoradiotherapy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;29(6):473‐478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rodriguez CP, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, et al. Clinical predictors of larynx preservation after multiagent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Head Neck. 2008;30(12):1535‐1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Terrell JE, Fisher SG, Wolf GT. Long‐term quality of life after treatment of laryngeal cancer. The Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(9):964‐971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Boscolo‐Rizzo P, Maronato F, Marchiori C, Gava A, Da Mosto MC. Long‐term quality of life after total laryngectomy and postoperative radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for laryngeal preservation. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(2):300‐306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rosenthal DI, Mohamed ASR, Weber RS, et al. Long‐term outcomes after surgical or nonsurgical initial therapy for patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: a 3‐decade survey. Cancer. 2015;121(10):1608‐1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Vengalil S, Giuliani ME, Huang SH, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients with T4 laryngeal cancer treated with primary radiotherapy versus primary laryngectomy. Head Neck. 2016;38(S1):E2035‐E2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Putten L, Bree R, Doornaert PA, et al. Salvage surgery in post‐chemoradiation laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma: outcome and review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015;35(3):162‐172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Voora RS, Panuganti BA, Flagg M, et al. Patterns of failure after definitive treatment of T4a larynx cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;167(2):274‐285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. US Department of Veterans Affairs . Corporate Data Warehouse: VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/vinci/cdw.cfm
  • 16. Voora RS, Kotha NV, Kumar A, et al. Association of race and health care system with disease stage and survival in veterans with larynx cancer. Cancer. 2021;127(15):2705‐2713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. NCCN Guidelines® for Head and Neck Cancers V.2.2023. ©National Comprehensive Cancer, May 16, 2023.
  • 18. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 28.0.1.0. 2021, IBM Corp: Armonk, NY.
  • 19. Sassler AM, Esclamado RM, Wolf GT. Surgery after organ preservation therapy. Analysis of wound complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(2):162‐165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hasan Z, Dwivedi RC, Gunaratne DA, Virk SA, Palme CE, Riffat F. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the complications of salvage total laryngectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(1):42‐51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ganly I, Patel S, Matsuo J, et al. Postoperative complications of salvage total laryngectomy. Cancer. 2005;103(10):2073‐2081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lavertu P, Bonafede JP, Adelstein DJ, et al. Comparison of surgical complications after organ‐preservation therapy in patients with stage III or IV squamous cell head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(4):401‐406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Rancati T, Schwarz M, Allen AM, et al. Radiation dose‐volume effects in the larynx and pharynx. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S64‐S69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Dornfeld K, Simmons JR, Karnell L, et al. Radiation doses to structures within and adjacent to the larynx are correlated with long‐term diet‐and speech‐related quality of life. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(3):750‐757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Browman GP, Wong G, Hodson I, et al. Influence of cigarette smoking on the efficacy of radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(3):159‐163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Giraldi L, Leoncini E, Pastorino R, et al. Alcohol and cigarette consumption predict mortality in patients with head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis within the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) Consortium. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2843‐2851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. La Vecchia C, Zhang ZF, Altieri A. Alcohol and laryngeal cancer: an update. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17(2):116‐124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Colasanto JM, Haffty BG, Wilson LD. Evaluation of local recurrence and second malignancy in patients with T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Cancer J. 2004;10(1):61‐66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. van der Putten L, de Bree R, Kuik DJ, et al. Salvage laryngectomy: oncological and functional outcome. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(4):296‐301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Givens DJ, Karnell LH, Gupta AK, et al. Adverse events associated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(12):1209‐1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figure 1: Disease‐specific survival among cases with local recurrence based on N category at diagnosis.

LIO2-9-e1317-s001.pdf (4.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES