Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2024 Aug 6;18(8):e0012337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012337

Southern African Origin of HTLV-1 in Romania

Olivier Cassar 1,*,#, Ambroise Marçais 2,#, Olivier Hermine 2, Emilie Deruelle 2, Giovanni Begliomini 1, Alexandru Bardas 3, Horia Bumbea 4, Andrei Colita 5, Daniel Coriu 3, Viola Maria Popov 6, Alina Tanase 3, Philippe Vicente Afonso 1, Antoine Gessain 1,*
Editor: Adly M M Abd-Alla7
PMCID: PMC11302904  PMID: 39106239

Abstract

In Europe, most HTLV-1-infected individuals originate from highly endemic regions such as West Indies, sub-Saharan Africa, and South America. The only genuine endemic region for HTLV-1 in Europe is Romania where ATL series have been reported among Romanian patients. Our objective is to better understand the origin of this endemic focus based on a study of the genetic diversity of HTLV-1 in Romanians. DNA was obtained from PBMCs/buffy coats of 11 unrelated HTLV-1-infected individuals of Romanian origin. They include 9 ATL cases and 2 asymptomatic carriers. LTR sequences were obtained for all specimens. Complete genomic HTLV-1 sequences were obtained using four PCR series on 10 specimens. Phylogenetic trees were generated from multiple alignments using HTLV-1 prototypic sequences and the new generated sequences. Most of the complete LTR sequences (756-bp) showed low nucleotide diversity, ranging from 0% to 0.8% difference, and were closely related (less than 0.8% divergence) to the only previously characterized Romanian strain, RKI2. One strain, ROU7, diverged slightly (1.5% on average) from the others. Phylogenetic analyses both on partial LTR and the complete genome demonstrate that the 11 sequences belong to the HTLV-1a cosmopolitan genotype and 10 of them belong to the previously denominated a-TC Mozambique–Southern Africa A subgroup. In this study, we demonstrated that the HTLV-1 present in Romania most probably originated in Southern Africa. As most Romanian HTLV-1 strains are very closely related, we can assume that HTLV-1 has been introduced into the Romanian population recently. Further studies are ongoing to decipher the routes of arrival and dissemination of these HTLV-1 strains, and to date the emergence of this endemic focus in Central Europe.

Author summary

In Europe, HTLV-1 infections mainly originate in regions such as the West Indies, sub-Saharan Africa and South America. However, Romania has been identified as a true endemic area, due to reported cases of ATL among Romanian patients. To understand this situation, we analyzed the genetic diversity of HTLV-1 in Romanians and collected DNA from 11 infected individuals, most of them ATL cases. The results showed a close genetic relationship between most of the sequences, closely matching the previously identified Romanian RKI2 strain. However, one strain, ROU7, showed a slight divergence. Phylogenetic analysis positioned these sequences in the cosmopolitan HTLV-1a genotype, belonging mainly to the a-TC Mozambique-Southern Africa subgroup. This suggests a probable origin of HTLV-1 in Romania from South Africa, perhaps recently introduced. Further studies aim to elucidate the transmission routes and emergence of this HTLV-1 endemicity in Central Europe.

Introduction

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is a human oncoretrovirus infecting at least 5 to 10 million individuals worldwide. It has major public health implications, mainly due to its causal association with severe diseases such as adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) and HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) [1]. Based on genetic variability, seven main HTLV-1 molecular genotypes (a to g) have been described in certain geographic areas and ethnic groups [2,3]. Although the virus is highly endemic in Southern Japan, sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean and Australo-Melanesia, its prevalence varies significantly from one population to another [2]. Moreover, HTLV-1 demonstrates remarkable genetic stability, with the observed polymorphism among viral strains correlating with the geographic origin of infected individuals. This limited genetic drift offers a molecular avenue for tracking viral transmission and the migrations of historical infected populations. In Europe, such as France, the United Kingdom or Spain, HTLV-1 is rare, except in people who have immigrated from highly endemic regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, the West Indies and South America, respectively [1,2].

Over the past 30 years, several studies indicate that Romania, a Central European country is a HTLV-1 endemic area in Europe [410]. This is based, on the one hand, on studies of blood donors (mandatory screening since 1999) with a seroprevalence of up to 0.053 in first time blood donors (ten times higher than in France and the UK) [11] and, on the other hand, on reports of ATL cases, mainly sporadic ones or small series [58], but also recently a large series of 56 patients [9]. However, no specific studies have been carried out to determine the origin of this virus. Therefore, to get new insights into this origin, we decided to study the genetic diversity of HTLV-1 present in Romanians.

Material and methods

Ethics statement

Formal written consent was obtained from participants in this study, which was approved by the Human Protection Committee Ile de France II (Comité de Protection des Personnes—CPP IdF II) registred as an Institutional Review Board (IRB registration number: 000001072) and the French Data Protection Authority (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés—CNIL registration number: 1692254).

Studied individuals and data collection

We included eleven HTLV-1 unrelated infected individuals living in Romania, mostly suffering from ATL (Table 1). They were referred for consultation and sometimes therapeutic treatment, mainly to the hematology department of Necker-Enfants Malades hospital (APHP) in Paris. They were all born in Romania, most of them living in Bucarest and selfidentify as Caucasian.

Table 1. Characteristics of HTLV-1 patients from Romania, including 9 cases with Adult T-cell leukemia (ATL).

ID Birth country Age at diagnosis (y) Gender ATL clinical status HIV status PVL (%)&
ROU1 Romania 27 F Chronic Negative 40
ROU2 Romania 32 F Acute Negative >50
ROU3 Romania 39 F Acute Negative >50
ROU4 Romania 26 M Acute Negative 31
ROU5 Romania 42 F Chronic Unknown 51
ROU6 Romania 48 M Chronic Negative 40
ROU7# Romania 37 F Carrier Negative <1
ROU8 Romania 30 F Carrier Negative 26
ROU9 Romania 53 F Acute Unknown NA
PH523 Romania 77 F Lymphoma Unknown NA
PH630# Romania 17 F Lymphoma Unknown NA

ATL: adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma; NA: Not available.

&Proviral load (PVL) expressed as a percentage of infected PBMCs.

#HTLV-1 seropositive mother.

Blood transfusion history

HIV and HBV screening and blood transfusion history

All but 4 patients (ROU5, ROU9, PH523 and PH630) were tested for HIV. HBV infection status was known for only 5 individuals (ROU1, ROU2, ROU3, ROU7 and ROU9). Two individuals have reported transfusion events that took place in Romania during infancy (ROU1 and ROU8).

HTLV-1 amplification and sequencing

High molecular weight DNA samples obtained from peripheral blood buffy coats were subjected to four series of PCR (F1-F4) using LTR-gag (F1), pro-pol (F2), pol-env (F3), and Px-LTR (F4) primers, which were designed from highly conserved regions for the major HTLV-1 subtypes. The LTR-gag primers are the following: Enh280: 5′-TGACGACAACCCCTCACCTCAA-3′ and R2380: 5′-GTCCGGAAAGGGAGGCGTATTAG-3′ corresponding to nucleotides 258 to 279 and 2,377 to 2,399 respectively of the prototype ATK-1 sequence (Genbank: J02029). The pro-pol primers are the following: F2279: 5′-GGAGCAGACATGACAGTCCTTCC-3′ (nt 2,254 to 2,276) and R5005: 5′-GGCGGCTATTAAGACCAGGAAGC-3′ (nt 5,002 to 5,024). The pol-env primers are the following: F4583: 5′-CAGGAGCCATCTCAGCTACCC-3′ (nt 4,560 to 4,580) and Env22: 5’-GGCGAGGTG GAGTCCTTGGAGGC-3’ (nt 60752 to 6,774). Finally, the Px-LTR primers are the following: F4bisfor: 5′- CCCTCCTTTACCCATCGTTAG -3′ (nt 5,941 to 5,961) and F4bisRev: 5′- CGCAGAACAGAAAACGAAAC-3′ (nt 8,867 to 8,886). The size of the different generated amplicons are the following: LTR-gag, 2,136-bp; pro-pol, 2,769-bp; pol-env, 2,078-bp and Px-LTR, 2,905-bp.

A PIKO thermocycler (Ozyme, Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, France) was used with the following amplification conditions for the first 3 fragments (F1-F3): 98°C, 30 s; 40× (98°C, 5 s; 67°C, 5 s; 72°C, 1 mn); 72°C, 1 mn and then for the last fragment (F4): 98°C, 30 s; 40× (98°C, 5 s; 61°C, 5 s; 72°C, 1 mn); 72°C, 1 mn. Reaction tubes were prepared in a dedicated room outside the laboratory, with a final volume of 50 μl (DNA matrix, 250 ng; dNTP mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 40 μM; 5×Phire reaction buffer which contains 1.5 mM MgCl2 at final reaction concentration (Life Technologies, Courtaboeuf, France), 5 μl; Phire hot start DNA polymerase (Life Technologies, Courtaboeuf, France), 2 U and 0.5 μM of each oligonucleotide primer (Eurofins Genomics, Germany). Five μl of amplified DNA was size fractionated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the PCR products (45 μl) were sent for purification and sequencing reactions to the Eurofins Genomics Company (Eurofins Genomics, Cologne, Germany).

The 4 fragments obtained were then sequenced using 18 pairs of primers [12] and the ClustalW algorithm (MacVector 18.6.1 software, Oxford Molecular) was implemented to align forward and reverse sequences of each segment to derive a consensus sequence of the full LTR (756-bp) region, and colinearized gag-pol-env-tax (7,567-bp) genes.

Phylogenetic analyses

For the LTR and concatenated gag-pol-env-tax genes analyses, sequences were aligned using the DAMBE program (version 4.2.13). The final alignment was submitted to the Modeltest program (version 3.6) and the best model was selected according to the Akaike information criterion. This was then applied to phylogenetic analyses using the PAUP program (version 4.0b10) to infer trees according to Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method. The tree architecture was later validated by the Maximum Likelihood method, using SeaView (version 5); the robustness of the clades was estimated by approximate likelihood-ratio test (aLRT).

LTR analyses

Phylogenetic comparison was performed on 485-nucleotide-long LTR alignment of isolates, including the 11 sequences generated in this study (in bold red) and 70 reference strains. The analysis was only carried out on 485-bp because the majority of sequences available in the LTR are not complete and this size, although reduced compared to the complete LTR (756-bp), made it possible to include a significant number of sequences from the different subgroups known in the transcontinental genotype. Two Transcontinental Japanese LTR sequences were used as outgroup (a-JPN). The phylogenetic tree was derived by the neighbor-joining method using the GTR model (gamma = 0.2884). Horizontal branch lengths are drawn to scale, with the bar indicating 0.005 nucleotide replacement per site. Numbers on each node indicate the support probability (approximate likelihood-ratio test, aLRT, calculated using the SeaView 5 software) for each cluster (Fig 1). Next to each sequence, three letters symbolize the country of origin of the infected individual (mostly IOC country codes): MOZ-Mozambic, RSA-Republic of South Africa, SWZ-Eswatini, IRN-Iran, KWT-Kuwait, SEN-Senegal, DRC- Democratic Republic of the Congo, UGA-Uganda, CIV-Côte d’Ivoire, ROU-Romania, TGO-Togo, AGO-Angola, NIG-Nigeria, JPN-Japan. The topology of the phylogenetic tree was validated by Maximum Likelihood method. The groups of interest are colored as follows: grey, blue, purple, orange, green, yellow belong to Transcontinental (TC) HTLV-1a genotype, Mozambic Southern Africa (B), Mozambic-Middle East, Mozambic, Mozambic Southern Africa (A) and Japanese (a-JPN), respectively. The GenBank accession nos OR852771 to OR852781 correspond to the 11 new LTR sequences obtained from Romanian ATL patients.

Fig 1. Phylogenetic tree generated with neighbor-joining (NJ) method on a 485-bp fragment of the LTR region for 81 HTLV-1 available sequences including the 11 generated in this work (in bold red type).

Fig 1

The numbers at some nodes of the tree correspond to the probability of each monophyletic groupe (a-LRT). The branch lengths are drawn to scale with bar indicating 0.005-nucleotide replacement by site. The ATK-1 and ATL-25 strains were used as outgroup.

Gag-pol-env-tax genes analyses

Phylogenetic analysis was derived from Neighbor-Joining method using the GTR model (gamma = 0.4815) and was confirmed using the Maximum Likelihood method. Phylogenetic tree was obtained from concatenated fragments of the 6,366-nucleotide-long gag-pol-env-tax genes, generated from 46 available complete HTLV-1 genomes comprising the sequences of genotypes a, b and c and the ten sequences generated in this work (in red bold type). Five complete Australo-Melanesian HTLV-1c sequences were used as outgroup. The topology of the tree was identical when the different genes were analyzed separately. Horizontal branch lengths are drawn to scale, with the bar indicating 0.01 nucleotide replacement per site. Numbers on each node indicate the aLRT for the supported cluster (Fig 2). The GenBank accession nos OR825456 to OR825465 correspond to the 10 new full HTLV-1 sequences obtained from Romanian ATL patients.

Fig 2. Phylogenetic tree generated with neighbor-joining (NJ) method on a 6,366-bp fragment of the HTLV-1 Gag-Pol-Env-Tax concatenated genes for 56 available sequences including the 10 generated in this work (in bold red type).

Fig 2

The numbers at some nodes of the tree correspond to the probability of each monophyletic groupe (a-LRT). The branch lengths are drawn to scale with bar indicating 0.01-nucleotide replacement by site. Five HTLV-1c Australo-Melanesian strains were used as outgroup.

Results

The 11 HTLV-1 infected individuals from Romania included 9 women (mean age 39.3, range 17–77) and 2 men (mean age 37 years) (Table 1). Of the eleven patients, four had acute ATL, three had chronic ATL and two had ATL lymphoma. In addition, two were asymptomatic carriers. The proviral load—expressed as a percentage of infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)—ranged from less than 1% to over 50%. We were able to test for the presence of HIV antibodies in 6 people, all of whom were negative (ROU1, ROU2, ROU3, ROU4, ROU7 and ROU8) (Table 1). Regarding hepatitis B virus status, only 5 individuals were tested: one was vaccinated (ROU1), one had antibodies indicating past infection (ROU2), two were negative (ROU3 and ROU7) and the last one was HbS carrier, indicating chronic infection (ROU9). Two patients had a history of blood transfusion performed in Romania at an early age: ROU1 was transfused during the neonatal period, and ROU8 had multiple transfusions during childhood for acute leukemia (5 years old).

Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) region analysis

The complete LTR sequence was obtained for the 11 samples from PCR fragments F1 and F4. Three sequences were identical (ROU2, ROU5 and ROU8). Most sequences displayed a low nucleotide diversity, i.e. less than 0.8% difference, and were closely related (less than 0.8% divergence) to the only previously characterized Romanian strain, RKI2 [13]. One strain, ROU7, diverged slightly (1.5% on average) from the others.

Phylogenetic analysis was performed on 485-bp-long LTR alignment of isolates, including the 11 sequences generated in this study (in bold red) and 70 reference strains which represent the different subtypes within HTLV-1 transcontinental (a-TC) strains (Fig 1). These subgroups were defined and named according to previous studies based on analysis of the LTR region of strains from very different geographical origins [3,14]. The analysis shows that the 11 new Romanian strains belong to the transcontinental HTLV-1a subgroup (a-TC). In addition, all but one (ROU7) belong to the a-TC Mozambique–Southern Africa A subgroup, in which Romanian RKI2 strain is also present (Fig 1). ROU7 is positioned outside this group.

The 11 new characterized sequences from Romania do not belong to the TC-Japan or TC-Middle East subgroups.

Colinearized gag-pol-env-tax genes fragment analysis

Due to limited DNA availability for sample ROU8, we were only able to generate the complete HTLV-1 proviral sequence for only 10 out of these 11 samples. Alignment of a 7523 nt long segment of the 10 genomes–the complete genome without LTRs–shows that, as with LTR, 9 strains were very close to each other: 2 are identical (ROU2 and ROU5) and the maximal nucleotide divergence is 0.2%. One strain (ROU7) was more distant with a divergence of around 1%.

Analysis of the sequences showed that the open reading frames (ORFs) were conserved, with the exception of strain PH630, which presents a stop codon in the pol gene.

Phylogenetic tree was obtained from concatenated fragments of the 6366-nucleotide-long Gag-Pol-Env-Tax genes, generated from 46 available complete HTLV-1 genomes comprising the sequences of genotypes a, b and c and the ten new sequences generated in this work (in red bold type) (Fig 2). This phylogenetic analysis confirms that the 10 new Romanian HTLV-1 strains all belong to the HTLV-1 a-TC subgroup. Notably, 9 of the 10 Romanian strains (sample ROU7 being the exception) form a specific “Romania” clade, within the highly supported a-TC Mozambic-Southern African A subgroup (Fig 2). The topology of the tree was identical when the different genes were analyzed separately.

Discussion

In this molecular epidemiological study, we demonstrated that the HTLV-1 present in Romanians living in Romania most probably originated in Southern Africa. As most Romanian HTLV-1 strains are very closely related, and sometimes identical, we can assume that HTLV-1 has been introduced into the Romanian population fairly recently with a limited number of strains, which leads to a founder viral effect. Furthermore, analysis of the different HTLV-1 genes separately generated a similar topology of the phylogenetic tree, consistent with the fact that mutations are found scattered throughout the genome. This suggests that these viruses were not generated by recombination [15].

Concerning the presence of a stop codon in the pol gene of the proviral strain of sample PH630, it has been suggested that ATL cells are clonally selected notably by acquiring a number of genetic alterations in viral genes (gag, pol, tax) that favor escape from the host immune system [16].

ATL develops preferentially in people infected with HTLV-1 in childhood, and rarely occurs in those infected in adulthood [17]. It is therefore likely that the ATL patients included in this study were infected at an early age. Interestingly, two patients had HTLV-1-seropositive mothers (PH630 and ROU7), suggesting possible mother-to-child transmission. The transfusion of two patients (ROU1 and ROU8) at an early age in Romania may explain their HTLV-1 positivity.

On the basis of the data available at present, we cannot demonstrate, or even suggest, how this virus entered Romania and then spread there. It is tempting to think that there is some similarity between the situation regarding the spread of HTLV-1 and that which existed a few decades ago in Romania for the epidemics of HIV and hepatitis B, particularly in children [18,19]. However, only solid, in depth epidemiological studies specifically seeking for risk factors for HTLV-1 acquisition in the Romanian population and the families of infected individuals, combined with historical data, will be needed to try to better understand the origin of the current situation. The fact that cases of ATL appeared clinically several decades ago in patients who were then on average 40 years old (this report, 5, 9) suggests occurences of HTLV-1 infection in Romania dating back to nearly 60 years ago. It should be noted that this epidemiological work will certainly be difficult to carry out due to the retrospective aspect of these studies, which therefore concern facts that are already old, associated with public health decisions taken at the time. The recent discovery that Moldavia, a small border country to the east of Romania, also appears to be an area of high HTLV-1 endemicity, based on blood donors studies, should also encourage local public health authorities to carry out this type of epidemiological study [20].

Above all, it is essential to pursue surveillance and research efforts to limit the spread of this virus within the Romanian population.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance of Drs Frenoy N. from Paul Brousse hospital (Villejuif, France) and Baumelou E. from Foch hospital (Suresnes, France), where some clinical specimens were collected.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from GenBank (Accession numbers: OR852771 to OR852781 and OR825456 to OR825465).

Funding Statement

o AG received funding from the French Government’s Investissement d’Avenir Program, Laboratoire d’Excellence “Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases” (Grant no. ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID), the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS-UMR 3569) and from the Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. None of the authors received a salary from the funders.

References

  • 1.Schierhout G, McGregor S, Gessain A, Einsiedel L, Martinello M, Kaldor J. Association between HTLV-1 infection and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. Jan;20(1):133–43. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30402-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gessain A, Cassar O. Epidemiological Aspects and World Distribution of HTLV-1 Infection. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:388. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Afonso PV, Cassar O, Gessain A. Molecular epidemiology, genetic variability and evolution of HTLV-1 with special emphasis on African genotypes. Retrovirology. 2019;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s12977-019-0504-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paun L, Ispas O, Del Mistro A, Chieco-Bianchi L. HTLV-I in Romania. Eur J Haematol. 1994. Feb;52(2):117–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1994.tb01297.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Veelken H, Kohler G, Schneider J, Dierbach H, Mertelsmann R, Schaefer HE, et al. HTLV-I-associated adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma in two patients from Bucharest, Romania. Leukemia. 1996. Aug;10(8):1366–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lin BT, Musset M, Szekely AM, Alexandre J, Fraitag S, Bodemer C, et al. Human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1-positive T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in a child. Report of a case and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997. Dec;121(12):1282–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tanase AD, Colita A, Craciun OG, Lipan L, Varady Z, Stefan L, et al. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma-Romanian Experience. J Clin Med. 2020. Jul 28;9(8). doi: 10.3390/jcm9082417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shtalrid M, Shvidel L, Korenfeld R, Duek A, Landau Z, Berrebi A. HTLV-1 associated adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in Israel: report of two patients of Romanian origin. Haematologica. 2005. Mar;90(3):ECR13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bumbea H, Marçais A, Coriu D, Tanase AD, Colita A, Bardas A, et al. Results from Treatment of a Large Cohort of ATL Patients from a Country with High HTLV-1 Prevalence. Blood. 2019;134. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stienlauf S, Yahalom V, Schwartz E, Shinar E, Segal G, Sidi Y. Epidemiology of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 infection in blood donors, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009. Jul;15(7):1116–8. doi: 10.3201/eid1507.080796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Laperche S, Worms B, Pillonel J. Blood safety strategies for human T-cell lymphotropic virus in Europe. Vox Sang. 2009. Feb;96(2):104–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01136.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cassar O, Einsiedel L, Afonso PV, Gessain A. Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 subtype C molecular variants among Indigenous Australians: New insights into the molecular epidemiology of HTLV-1 in Australo-Melanesia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ellerbrok H, Fleischer C, Salemi M, Reinhardt P, Ludwig WD, Vandamme AM, et al. Sequence analysis of the first HTLV-I infection in Germany without relations to endemic areas. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1998. Sep 1;14(13):1199–203. doi: 10.1089/aid.1998.14.1199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vicente AC, Gudo ES, Iniguez AM, Otsuki K, Bhatt N, Abreu CM, et al. Genetic characterization of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 in Mozambique: transcontinental lineages drive the HTLV-1 endemic. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011; 5(4):e1038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cassar O, Desrames A, Marcais A, Gout O, Taylor GP, Hermine O, et al. Multiple recombinant events in human T-cell Leukemia virus Type 1: complete sequences of recombinant African strains. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020. Dec;9(1):913–23. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1752117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kataoka K, Nagata Y, Kitanaka A, Shiraishi Y, Shimamura T, Yasunaga J, et al. Integrated molecular analysis of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma. Nature genetics. 2015; 47(11), 1304–1315. doi: 10.1038/ng.3415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Watanabe T. Adult T-cell leukemia: molecular basis for clonal expansion and transformation of HTLV-1–infected T cells. Blood. 2017. Mar 2; 129(9): 1071–1081. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-692574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haukenes G, Brinchmann-Hansen K, & Macovei O. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C and HIV antibodies in children in a Romanian orphanage. APMIS. 1992; 100(7–12), 757–761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hersh BS, Popovici F, Jezek Z, Satten GA, Apetrei RC, Beldescu N, et al. Risk factors for HIV infection among abandoned Romanian children. Aids. 1993;7(12), 1617–1624. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199312000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rosadas C., Harvala H., Davison K., & Taylor G. P. HTLV-1 screening of blood donations: We are systematically missing opportunities. Br J Haematol. 2023; 202(6), 1220–1223. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012337.r001

Decision Letter 0

Andrea Marzi, Adly MM Abd-Alla

15 Mar 2024

Dear Dr. Cassar,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Southern African Origin for HTLV-1 in Romania" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Adly M.M. Abd-Alla, Prof asso.

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Andrea Marzi

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The main method of this study consists in the molecular analysis of these new HTLV sequences. Therefore, it is essential to include in methods how the sequences were obtained, and all phylogenetic analysis done. This information is currently spread in results session. Authors need to include it in methods.

First statement of results belongs to methods. And authors need to expand briefly on the method used (reference 12).

“DNA samples were obtained from peripheral blood buffy coats. The LTR sequence was obtained for the 11 samples, as previously described (12)”

Figure 1 and 2 legends also contain important information that needs to be in methods.

The following statement in results also should be in methods.

“The DNA samples were subjected to four series of PCR (F1-F4) using both a high-fidelity hot-start DNA polymerase and primers designed from highly conserved regions for the major HTLV-1 subtypes. In brief, we obtained four different HTLV-1 proviral genomic regions, each about 2.5 kb in length: F1, LTR-Gag; F2, pro-pol; F3, pol-env and F4, tax-LTR. PCR products were then directly sequenced on both strands using a set of 16 specific primers (12). After alignment of sense and antisense sequences using the Clustal W algorithm (Mac Vector 18.6.1 software, Oxford molecular), comparison of each generated segment was implemented to derive a consensus sequence.”

Minor points:

- How many patients were tested for HBV?

- How many mothers were tested?

- Include in methods information about transfusion (the first time this is mentioned is in discussion). Was it done in Romania?

- If available, it would be interesting to know how long they have been out of Romania.

Reviewer #3: There appear no problems in the objectives, methods and interpretation of the results.

Ethical or regulatory requirements are properly met.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Results

Authors says that all sequences except ROU7 belong to a-TC-Mozambique – Southern Africa A subgroup. What about the outlier (ROU7) ?

Authors did whole genome sequence of 10/11 sequences, please inform the reader which sample was missing.

Authors say that stop mutations are quite frequent in ATL. This needs to go to discussion, and a reference is needed.

Authors say that 9/10 Romanian strain form a specific “Romania” clade. Please add in the text which sample is the exception.

The last paragraph of result can be moved to discussion.

Suggest replacing “They” at the beginning of the second paragraph of results for something more specific Newly characterised sequences…

Reviewer #3: Figure 1 and 2: The figures are blurred and the texts in the figures unreadable.

The analysis itself is appropriate and the results are described clearly.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Authors need to include a conclusion session.

Reviewer #3: 1. Page 14: I understand that all the viruses identified in Romania seem to originate from Mozambique, but there is little discussion on the background and reasons for this. Is this because of immigrants? Also, given that multiple individuals have been infected, shouldn't there be a discussion of how and when the virus entered the country and how it spread within the country?

2. Page 14 and figure 2: The possible origin of the remaining one specimen should be discussed

3. Page 14, lines 11-13: Since many cases of ATL from horizontal infection have been confirmed in Japan, should the wording be weakened?

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: As mentioned above, the figures in the PDF are very poor to understand what are described. This may be due to the problems in making PDF, however, the clear figures need to be provided to the reviewers.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: This manuscript brings novel and interesting data that sheds light on HTLV-1 spread to Romania, a high endemic country in Europe. The molecular analysis is done at high standard and shows convincing evidence of a recent African origin.

However, some methods are currently described in result session or Figure legends. Discussion can also be expanded.

Authors could include discussion about current situation of HTLV response in Romania. Are they testing Blood donors? Are they testing organ donors? They can also discuss strategies that can limit the spread of this virus in Romania (as they suggested this should be done).

Another interesting point to discuss is how to limit spread to other countries. Recent blood donor data indicates high prevalence of HTLV in Moldova and brings concern about other countries within the region where no HTLV prevalence data is available. Authors have extensive experience on HTLV epidemiology and could expand on this topic. Another question that this study brings is if the origin of HTLV in Moldova is the same as they have revealed for Romania.

Reviewer #3: It is significant that the origin of HTLV-1 in Romania has been clarified.

However, there appears some room for improvement in interpretation and discussion of the data、in addition to the poor quality of the figures.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Carolina Rosadas

Reviewer #3: Yes: Toshiki Watanabe

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer_comments.docx

pntd.0012337.s001.docx (14.6KB, docx)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012337.r003

Decision Letter 1

Andrea Marzi, Adly MM Abd-Alla

3 Jul 2024

Dear Dr. Cassar,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Southern African Origin of HTLV-1 in Romania' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Adly M.M. Abd-Alla, Prof asso.

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Andrea Marzi

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #2: NA

Reviewer #3: The description of the method has been improved significantly with revisions suggested by the reviewers. Thus, readers can understand them clearly.

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #2: NA

Reviewer #3: Responding to the reviewers’ comments, revised descriptions have been improved so that the readers can clearly understand the information.

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #2: NA

Reviewer #3: The manuscript does not have an independent section of conclusions; however, interpretation and the significance of the results is presented in the discussion section, which appear to be reasonable and understandable to the readers.

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: They are improved in the revised manuscript.

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #2: I appreciate the changes made by authors, I believe they answer all questions appropriately and I am happy with the revised version of the manuscript.

Reviewer #3: The abstract section provides the summary and comments, which are reasonable based on the results obtained

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: Yes: Carolina Rosadas

Reviewer #3: No

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012337.r004

Acceptance letter

Andrea Marzi, Adly MM Abd-Alla

23 Jul 2024

Dear Dr. Cassar,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Southern African Origin of HTLV-1 in Romania," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer_comments.docx

    pntd.0012337.s001.docx (14.6KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to reviewers_22-05-24.docx

    pntd.0012337.s002.docx (35.2KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data that support the findings of this study are available from GenBank (Accession numbers: OR852771 to OR852781 and OR825456 to OR825465).


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES