Abstract
Purpose of review:
To highlight the clinical features of mpox with an emphasis on ocular manifestations and to review treatment options for this re-emerging infectious disease.
Recent Findings:
Ocular involvement of mpox varies by clade. The most recent 2022 outbreak appears to be associated with fewer conjunctivitis cases compared to previous outbreaks. However, the ocular findings occurring during this newly emerging clade can be visually threatening and include cases of keratitis, rapidly progressing scleritis, and necrotizing periorbital rashes.
Summary:
Ocular mpox is an important clinical feature of systemic mpox virus (MPXV) infection. Heightened clinical suspicion allows for a timely diagnosis and the initiation of anti-viral treatment, when appropriate. Randomized clinical trials for mpox systemic and ocular treatment efficacy are lacking. Prior clinical experience with smallpox and in-vitro mpox data support the use of systemic antivirals such as tecovirimat, cidofovir, brincidofovir and topical use of trifluridine in ocular mpox management, though treatment-resistant infection can occur and portend a poor prognosis.
Keywords: Mpox, mpox virus, orthopoxvirus, re-emerging infectious diseases
Introduction
Mpox is one of several re-emerging infectious diseases. Similar to other emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases (e.g. COVID-19, Ebola, Zika) ocular involvement contributes to the overall clinical burden of disease.
This review will summarize the virology and epidemiology of mpox. We will review the systemic manifestations of this disease. Ocular manifestations and treatment options will be highlighted.
Virology
Mpox is the preferred term for the viral illness caused by the mpox virus (MPXV). MPXV is an enveloped double-stranded DNA virus belonging to the Orthopoxvirus genus in the Poxviridae family. Other members of the Orthopoxvirus genus include the cowpox and smallpox viruses. Mpox binds to surface cell glycosaminoglycans and enters host cells by endocytosis. MPXV DNA replication progresses within cytoplasmic structures called factories[1] During the rapid viral replication cycle, mature virions are produced, fuse to the host cytoplasmic membranes and exit the cell[2].
The MPXV genome is approximately 197 kb and encodes 200 proteins[3]. Like other poxviridae, genes responsible for transcription, replication, and assembly, are located in a relatively conserved central coding region. The sequences located at the ends of the genome are more variable and contain genes attributable to pathogenicity and immunomodulation[4].
MPXV genetic sequences are classified into clades. Clade is nomenclature for a group of organisms that include a common ancestor. Clade I describes the virus transmitted originally in Central Africa/Congo Basin. Clade II describes the virus initially transmitted in West Africa. The genome from the most recent outbreak is being classified and is often referred to as Clade IIB and/or Clade III[5–7].
Epidemiology
The first human case of mpox was reported in 1970 in a 9 month old boy from the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1970.[8] Over the next several decades, mpox occurred sporadically in Central and East Africa (Clade I) and West Africa (Clade II). Clade I is associated with a higher case fatality rate (10.6 %) than the Clade II (3.6 %) [9].The first human case of mpox outside of Africa was in 2003 in the USA and was associated with infected animal contact from the exotic animal trade[10]. Since 2018 and escalating rapidly since 2022, mpox has been diagnosed in numerous countries across the globe. In July 2022, the World Health Organization declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern [11]. From January 2022 through April 2023, over 87,000 laboratory-confirmed cases from 111 countries/territories of mpox had been reported to the WHO. This report included 130 deaths [12] This estimate underestimates the true global burden of disease as not all cases are laboratory confirmed.
Mpox can affect all humans of any age who have had exposure to the MPXV. The median incubation period after virus contact to the development of systemic symptoms is 7 days[13]. In the most recent outbreak, mpox has been more commonly identified in men who have sex with men communities [14, 15]. Spread of MPXV can occur with close contact skin-to-skin contact, (including sexual contact), through saliva, mucous membrane exposure, respiratory droplets, environmental contamination, contact with infected animals, or vertical (maternal–fetal) transmission[16, 17]. MPXV is detectable in semen[18]. Semen to eye[19] and hand to eye MPXV transmission can occur. As with prevention of any infectious disease, handwashing and avoidance of hand-eye contact are key in prevention of disease.
Systemic Findings of Mpox
Mpox shares many similar clinical features with infections caused by other pox viruses[20]. The natural history of mpox is described in phases. The first phase is characterized by prodromal symptoms including fever, lymphadenopathy, myalgia, headache, as well as mild respiratory illness and usually lasts for 1–2 weeks[21, 22]. An umbilicated vesicular rash is the predominant finding of the next phase, which spreads from the face down. Unlike chickenpox, skin lesions usually appear simultaneously and follow a centrifugal distribution at each site[23]. MPXV can stimulate the development of any number of skin pox lesions range from a few to thousands. Occasionally the pox lesions can be painful enough to require hospitalization for pain control until crusting over occurs [21]. Identification of lymphadenopathy, in particular inguinal lymphadenopathy, and anogenital rash are helpful in distinguishing between mpox and smallpox[14].
In most cases, the infection is self-limiting, and the rash resolves within 2 weeks[24]. However, pediatric, pregnant, and immunocompromised patients may progress to severe, disseminated disease with sepsis, pneumonia, encephalitis, and globe-threatening eye infections[25–30]. Mortality occurs at a rate of 0.1–10% and varies with each clade [30, 31] The 1988 mpox outbreak in Zaire (now present day Democratic Republic of Congo) reported a 10% mortality rate (33 deaths among 338 mpox patients). In that outbreak, all deaths occurred in unvaccinated children between 3 months and 8 years old[32]. Between May 2022 and March 2023, the CDC reported 38 deaths among 30,235 cases (0.1%), with the majority fatalities (93.9%) occurring in immunocompromised patients with HIV infections[33].
Ocular Findings of Mpox
Mpox ophthalmic disease can be subcategorized into external and ocular infections. The external infection is characterized by the presence of a vesicular rash on the skin of the eyelids and periorbital region. [32, 34]. These lesions are identical to the cutaneous pox lesions elsewhere on the body (Figure 1) [35–37]. A retrospective review of 40 patients hospitalized for mpox in Nigeria between September 2017 and December 2018 demonstrated 25% developed a pox rash around the eye [38].
Figure 1.
Mpox Eyelid Vesicles. Active umbilicated pox lesions (left). Healing and crusted mpox lesions(right).[37]
Ocular disease represents MPXV infections of the globe with or without a pox rash on the surrounding periorbital skin. Pox lesion may develop directly on the conjunctiva. Mpox related conjunctivitis, scleritis, keratitis and uveitis have all been reported [25]. In the 2014 Clade I outbreak, conjunctivitis was the most common ocular complication, reported in 23.1%. In this outbreak, the presence of conjunctivitis was associated with more severe systemic disease[39]. The 2022 outbreak appears to be associated with fewer cases of conjunctivitis. In 528 cases diagnosed in 16 countries between April and June 2022, conjunctivitis was reported in only 3 patients (0.6%)[21]. Another series of 197 cases in London between May and July 2022 reported 2 patients with conjunctivitis (1.0%)[40]. Mpox related conjunctivitis can take a variety of forms including follicular, serpiginous (described as white, infiltrative, and thickened conjunctiva), nodular, ulcerative, pseudomembranous, and can occur with and without conjunctival pox lesions.[41–44] (FIGURE 2). Conjunctivitis and/or conjunctival pox lesions may develop before eyelid skin pox lesions are noted[42]. A subconjunctival nodule with only mild sectoral hyperemia has been reported[45].
Figure 2.
Mpox Associated Serpiginous Conjunctivitis[42]
Corneal involvement can occur with mpox. Ulcerative keratitis can cause corneal scarring leading to significant visual morbidity. Clade I reported a 4.1% incidence of keratitis and corneal ulceration[32]. Ulcerative keratitis is also occurring in this most recent outbreak[24, 34, 46, 47]. Blepharoconjunctivitis can accompany keratitis [48]. Some corneal ulcers are non-healing or slow to heal suggesting a neurotrophic component to the mpox keratitis [19, 49]. Of note, corneal ulceration, perforation, and disciform keratitis are also known visually threatening complications of smallpox[50].
Mpox associated uveitis can occur as anterior uveitis [49, 51], disciform keratitis with endothelial plaques and keratic precipitates, [19, 52] and scleritis[19, 53]. Notably, prolonged use of cidofovir for any indication, including for the treatment of mpox, can result in drug induced uveitis and hypotony.
In general, ocular involvement occurs with systemic symptoms and pox lesions. However ocular-only mpox, with no systemic symptoms or skin lesions, has been described [19]. Here (FIGURE 3), a vaccinated patient with no pox lesions presented with episcleritis which progressed to vision-threatening scleritis, keratitis and uveitis. In this case, MPXV was detected in the anterior chamber. In addition, repeat ocular surface swabs for MPXV PCR remailed positive for several months. This patient ultimately lost vision despite aggressive and long-term topical and systemic anti-viral treatment.
Figure 3.
Ocular only mpox. No skin lesions with nasal episcleritis (upper left) progresses to necrotizing sclerokeratitis with a neurotrophic cornea and persistently positive MPXV detection from the ocular surface[19].
Unvaccinated and immunocompromised individuals experienced more severe and frequent ocular manifestations compared to their vaccinated counterparts[54]. Systemically and visually devastating pan-facial gangrene with ocular rupture has been described in immunocompromised patients with both mpox and AIDS. Both patients died secondary to mpox systemic complications[54].
As mpox related ocular involvement can be visually threatening, any patient with mpox-related periocular pox lesions should be seen by an ophthalmologist. Immunocompromised patients with periocular involvement, especially when associated with a red eye should be referred for urgent evaluation.
Eye Treatment
Currently there are no definitively established antiviral regimens for the treatment of ocular mpox[55]. Trifluridine 1% is effective against herpetic keratitis and was the preferred treatment for ocular vaccinia following exposure to smallpox ACAM2000 vaccinees in 2004 [56–58]. Because of this and due to the fact that mpox is a DNA virus, the CDC recommends consideration of topical trifluridine 1% in cases of mpox ocular infections[55]. When combined with appropriate systemic antiviral therapy, topical trifluridine may help clear mpox associated conjunctivitis[24, 59]. Topical trifluridine is limited by drug-induced corneal epithelial toxicity[60] and long term use is generally avoided. As with other ocular viral infections, when corneal epithelial defects are present, it is important to consider a topical antibacterial agent to prevent or treat a bacterial superinfection. In isolated cases of ocular mpox, topical ganciclovir gel and povidone iodine drops (0.6–1%) have been trialed[42, 61]. Frequent topical lubrication is also recommended to improve ocular comfort[62]. Topical corticosteroids are contraindicated, as use was associated with treatment resistance and keratoplasty graft failure in corneal cowpox infections[63].
Systemic Treatment
There is no systemic treatment approved specifically for mpox. However, because mpox and smallpox share similarities in viral structure and clinical presentation, anti-virals effective against smallpox are commonly used to treat mpox. Examples of theses anti-virals include tecovirimat, cidovovir, and brincidofovir [64]. Several of these anti-virals have also shown efficacy against MPXV in vitro [65]. Tecovirimat works by preventing viral replication and release. It can be administered orally or intravenously. Cidofovir and brincidofovir both work by interfering with viral DNA polymerase. Cidofovir is only available as an intravenous infusion and carries a risk of nephrotoxicity [66]. Systemic cidofovir can also be associated with hypotony and drug-induced uveitis, so special consideration and monitoring must be made in patients with mpox related uveitis. Brincidofovir is the prodrug of cidofovir, is available both orally and intravenously, is reported to be less nephrotoxic[67] and may carry some risk of hepatotoxity[68]. As with many viral illnesses, systemic treatment is not always indicated. The vast majority of patients infected with MPXV have mild systemic symptoms and recover without specific treatment. In some cases, supportive care for nausea, vomiting, dehydration or local pain is required. However, anti-viral systemic treatment is typically recommended for immunocompromised patients[69] because this population is high risk for the development of severe disease. Here, tecovirimat commonly being used as a first line systemic antiviral therapeutic. Administration of a smallpox vaccine has protection against the development of mpox[70]. This vaccine is recommended for adults who are at high-risk for exposure to MPXV[71].
Other Eye-Specific Mpox Considerations
To date there are no known cases of mpox transmission after solid organ or corneal transplant. To reduce the theoretical risk of mpox transmission via transplanted ocular tissue, the Eye Bank Association of America issued an informal guidance in July 2022 advising a twenty-one day avoidance period of any donated eye tissue associated with donors with new pox lesions, or who tested positive for any Orthopoxvirus including MPXV, or who had close contact with mpox-infected individuals[72]. However, in rare cases, MPXV can continue to be detected on the ocular surface for several months [19][44]. It is up to the discretion and risk benefit analysis of the eye surgeon to accept tissue beyond this recommended, but not data-driven, 21-day hold period.
Conclusion
Ophthalmology continues to have an important role in the identification of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Mpox, as with other orthomyxovirdae can present with ocular manifestations. Mpox related eye findings range from self-resolving conjunctivitis to blinding keratitis and scleritis. Clinical suspicion for mpox should be considered in all high-risk groups.
Familiarity with the epidemiology and systemic manifestations of mpox will allow ophthalmologists to consider mpox in the differential diagnosis any patient with skin lesions and a red eye. Particularly heightened clinical suspicion for mpox is important in all immunocompromised individuals with ocular inflammation.
Key points:
An umbilicated vesicular skin rash and inguinal lymphadenopathy are important systemic features of mpox.
Ocular mpox may be characterized by periorbital skin lesions with or without conjunctivitis, conjunctivitis with or without skin pox lesions, scleritis, keratitis and anterior uveitis.
Populations at risk for severe, life-threatening mpox related systemic disease and visual-threatening eye infections include young children, and immunocompromised and unvaccinated individuals.
For immunocompromised patients and patients with severe mpox, systemic treatment (tecovirimat, cidofovir or brincidofovir) and ocular (trifluridine 1%) can be used. However, recalcitrant disease does exist and can result in devastating systemic and visual outcomes.
Acknowledgements:
With continued appreciation for the collaboration, expertise and consultation of the University of California San Francisco Infectious Disease Division including Su Aung MD, MPH, Sarah B. Doernberg MD, Katherine Yang PharmD MPH, Kevin Miles NP, Jennifer Babik, MD, PhD, Emily Lydon MD, and Daniel J. Minter, MD
Financial support and sponsorship:
This work was supported in part by grant R01EY032861 and K12EY031372 from the National Institutes of Health National Eye Institute (NIH-NEI), grant EY002162 (Core Grant for Vision Research, from the NIH-NEI, and an Unrestricted Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: No relevant conflicts of interest.
Dr. Seitzman is a consultant for Dompé pharmaceuticals, Kedrion biopharma, and Tarsus pharmaceuticals.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
* of special interest
** of outstanding interest
- [1].Kaler J, Hussain A, Flores G et al. Monkeypox: A Comprehensive Review of Transmission, Pathogenesis, and Manifestation. Cureus 2022; 14:e26531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Kieser Q, Noyce RS, Shenouda M et al. Cytoplasmic factories, virus assembly, and DNA replication kinetics collectively constrain the formation of poxvirus recombinants. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0228028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Lansiaux E, Jain N, Laivacuma S, Reinis A. The virology of human monkeypox virus (hMPXV): A brief overview. Virus Res 2022; 322:198932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Lefkowitz EJ, Wang C, Upton C. Poxviruses: past, present and future. Virus Res 2006; 117:105–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Wang L, Shang J, Weng S et al. Genomic annotation and molecular evolution of monkeypox virus outbreak in 2022. J Med Virol 2023; 95:e28036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Happi C, Adetifa I, Mbala P et al. Urgent need for a non-discriminatory and non-stigmatizing nomenclature for monkeypox virus. PLoS Biol 2022; 20:e3001769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * Describes rational for neutral and non-stigmatizing nomenclature of mpox virus
- [7].Woolley SD, Lester R, Devine K et al. Clade IIb A.3 monkeypox virus: an imported lineage during a large global outbreak. Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23:405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Ladnyj ID, Ziegler P, Kima E. A human infection caused by monkeypox virus in Basankusu Territory, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Bull World Health Organ 1972; 46:593–597. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Li H, Zhang H, Ding K et al. The evolving epidemiology of monkeypox virus. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2022; 68:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Update: multistate outbreak of monkeypox--Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003; 52:642–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Nuzzo JB, Borio LL, Gostin LO. The WHO Declaration of Monkeypox as a Global Public Health Emergency. JAMA 2022; 328:615–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].World Health Organization: Multi-country outbreak of mpox. Situtation Report #22. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/multi-country-outbreak-of-mpox--external-situation-report−-22-−-11-may-2023.
- [13].Chenchula S, Ghanta MK, Amerneni KC et al. A systematic review to identify novel clinical characteristics of monkeypox virus infection and therapeutic and preventive strategies to combat the virus. Arch Virol 2023; 168:195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Inigo Martinez J, Gil Montalban E, Jimenez Bueno S et al. Monkeypox outbreak predominantly affecting men who have sex with men, Madrid, Spain, 26 April to 16 June 2022. Euro Surveill 2022; 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Vusirikala A, Charles H, Balasegaram S et al. Epidemiology of Early Monkeypox Virus Transmission in Sexual Networks of Gay and Bisexual Men, England, 2022. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:2082–2086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mpox How It Spreads. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/if-sick/transmission.html. Accessed July 9, 2023.
- [17].Kamal A, Suppah M, Saadoun R, Yassin M. A Comprehensive Review of the Current Monkeypox Outbreak. Cureus 2023; 15:e34807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * A comprehensive review of mpox with an emphasis on the 2022 outbreak
- [18].Lapa D, Carletti F, Mazzotta V et al. Monkeypox virus isolation from a semen sample collected in the early phase of infection in a patient with prolonged seminal viral shedding. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22:1267–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Nguyen MT, Mentreddy A, Schallhorn J et al. Isolated Ocular Mpox without Skin Lesions, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2023; 29:1285–1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; *Novel case report of ocular only mpox with no systemic or skin symptoms
- [20].Adler H, Gould S, Hine P et al. Clinical features and management of human monkeypox: a retrospective observational study in the UK. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22:1153–1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S et al. Monkeypox Virus Infection in Humans across 16 Countries - April-June 2022. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:679–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** Large case series highlighting epidemiology, presentation, clinical course and outcomes of 527 mpox cases diagnosed across 16 countries between April and June 2022
- [22].McCollum AM, Damon IK. Human monkeypox. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:260–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Di Giulio DB, Eckburg PB. Human monkeypox: an emerging zoonosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2004; 4:15–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Cash-Goldwasser S, Labuda SM, McCormick DW et al. Ocular Monkeypox - United States, July-September 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:1343–1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Pastula DM, Copeland MJ, Hannan MC et al. Two Cases of Monkeypox-Associated Encephalomyelitis - Colorado and the District of Columbia, July-August 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:1212–1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Billioux BJ, Mbaya OT, Sejvar J, Nath A. Neurologic Complications of Smallpox and Monkeypox: A Review. JAMA Neurol 2022; 79:1180–1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Nalca A, Rimoin AW, Bavari S, Whitehouse CA. Reemergence of monkeypox: prevalence, diagnostics, and countermeasures. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:1765–1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Bizova B, Vesely D, Trojanek M, Rob F. Coinfection of syphilis and monkeypox in HIV positive man in Prague, Czech Republic. Travel Med Infect Dis 2022; 49:102368.35661824 [Google Scholar]
- [29].Nagata N, Saijo M, Kataoka M et al. Pathogenesis of fulminant monkeypox with bacterial sepsis after experimental infection with West African monkeypox virus in a cynomolgus monkey. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014; 7:4359–4370. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Huhn GD, Bauer AM, Yorita K et al. Clinical characteristics of human monkeypox, and risk factors for severe disease. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:1742–1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Guarner J, Del Rio C, Malani PN. Monkeypox in 2022-What Clinicians Need to Know. JAMA 2022; 328:139–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * Brief review of mpox outbreak in 2022 by infectious disease experts
- [32].Jezek Z, Szczeniowski M, Paluku KM, Mutombo M. Human monkeypox: clinical features of 282 patients. J Infect Dis 1987; 156:293–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Riser AP, Hanley A, Cima M et al. Epidemiologic and Clinical Features of Mpox-Associated Deaths - United States, May 10, 2022-March 7, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 72:404–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Kaufman AR, Chodosh J, Pineda R 2nd. Monkeypox Virus and Ophthalmology-A Primer on the 2022 Monkeypox Outbreak and Monkeypox-Related Ophthalmic Disease. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** Comprehensive review of mpox with an emphasis on ocular mpox: clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, transmission and prevention published in the beginning of the 2022 outbreak
- [35].Benatti SV, Venturelli S, Comi N et al. Ophthalmic manifestation of monkeypox infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22:1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Mazzotta V, Mondi A, Carletti F et al. Ocular involvement in monkeypox: Description of an unusual presentation during the current outbreak. J Infect 2022; 85:573–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Uner OE, Hubbard DC 2nd, Torres-Quinones C et al. Human MPox (Monkeypox) Virus Membranous Keratoconjunctivitis With Transient Corneal Hypoesthesia and Late Symblepharon Formation: A Novel Case and Clinical Implications. Cornea 2023; 42:751–754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Ogoina D, Iroezindu M, James HI et al. Clinical Course and Outcome of Human Monkeypox in Nigeria. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71:e210–e214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Hughes CMA, Pukuta E, Karhemere S, Nguete B, Lushima RS, et al. Ocular complications associated with acute monkeypox virus infection, DRC. In: 21:276–7. Int J Infect Dis 2014. [Google Scholar]
- [40].Patel A, Bilinska J, Tam JCH et al. Clinical features and novel presentations of human monkeypox in a central London centre during the 2022 outbreak: descriptive case series. BMJ 2022; 378:e072410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Meduri E, Malcles A, Kecik M. Conjunctivitis with Monkeypox Virus Positive Conjunctival Swabs. Ophthalmology 2022; 129:1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Ly-Yang F, Miranda-Sanchez A, Burgos-Blasco B et al. Conjunctivitis in an Individual With Monkeypox. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022; 140:1022–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Scandale P, Raccagni AR, Nozza S. Unilateral Blepharoconjunctivitis due to Monkeypox Virus Infection. Ophthalmology 2022; 129:1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Bhamray-Sanchez D, Subramanian S, Dever LL, Chew D. Ocular MPox: A report of two cases. IDCases 2023; 31:e01706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Foos W, Wroblewski K, Ittoop S. Subconjunctival Nodule in a Patient With Acute Monkeypox. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022; 140:e223742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Mailhe M, Beaumont AL, Thy M et al. Clinical characteristics of ambulatory and hospitalized patients with monkeypox virus infection: an observational cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023; 29:233–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Raccagni AR, Clemente T, Ranzenigo M et al. Persistent ocular mpox infection in an immunocompetent individual. Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23:652–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Vasquez-Perez A, Magan T, Volpe G et al. Necrotizing Blepharoconjunctivitis and Keratitis in Human Monkeypox. JAMA Ophthalmol 2023; 141:285–288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Androudi S, Kaufman AR, Kouvalakis A et al. Non-Healing Corneal Ulcer and Uveitis Following Monkeypox Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2023:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Semba RD. The ocular complications of smallpox and smallpox immunization. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121:715–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Carvalho EM, Medeiros M, Veloso VG et al. Monkeypox Infection Causing Conjunctival Vesicles and Anterior Uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2023:1–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Alsarhani WK, Chan CC, Boyd SR et al. Monkeypox-Associated Disciform Keratitis. Cornea 2023; 42:641–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Finamor LPS, de Freitas D, Andrade G et al. Tecovirimat Treatment for Monkeypox Virus Keratouveitis. JAMA Ophthalmol 2023; 141:210–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Carrubba S, Geevarghese A, Solli E et al. Novel severe oculocutaneous manifestations of human monkeypox virus infection and their historical analogues. Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23:e190–e197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Interim clinical considerations for management of ocular mpox virus infection.https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/clinicians/ocular-infection.html. Accessed February 20, 2023.; ** CDC guidance on treatment of ocular mpox
- [56].Carmine AA, Brogden RN, Heel RC et al. Trifluridine: a review of its antiviral activity and therapeutic use in the topical treatment of viral eye infections. Drugs 1982; 23:329–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Hu G, Wang MJ, Miller MJ et al. Ocular vaccinia following exposure to a smallpox vaccinee. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137:554–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Altmann S, Brandt CR, Murphy CJ et al. Evaluation of therapeutic interventions for vaccinia virus keratitis. J Infect Dis 2011; 203:683–690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Perzia B, Theotoka D, Li K et al. Treatment of ocular-involving monkeypox virus with topical trifluridine and oral tecovirimat in the 2022 monkeypox virus outbreak. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2023; 29:101779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Imperia PS, Lazarus HM, Dunkel EC et al. An in vitro study of ophthalmic antiviral agent toxicity on rabbit corneal epithelium. Antiviral Res 1988; 9:263–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Lamas-Francis D, Trevino M, Perez-Freixo H et al. Corneal Ulcer due to Monkeypox Infection. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2022:1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Reynolds MG, McCollum AM, Nguete B et al. Improving the Care and Treatment of Monkeypox Patients in Low-Resource Settings: Applying Evidence from Contemporary Biomedical and Smallpox Biodefense Research. Viruses 2017; 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Graef S, Kurth A, Auw-Haedrich C et al. Clinicopathological findings in persistent corneal cowpox infection. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013; 131:1089–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Srivastava S, Kumar S, Jain S et al. The Global Monkeypox (Mpox) Outbreak: A Comprehensive Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Frenois-Veyrat G, Gallardo F, Gorge O et al. Tecovirimat is effective against human monkeypox virus in vitro at nanomolar concentrations. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:1951–1955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Leowattana W Antiviral Drugs and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Infect Disord Drug Targets 2019; 19:375–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Chittick G, Morrison M, Brundage T, Nichols WG. Short-term clinical safety profile of brincidofovir: A favorable benefit-risk proposition in the treatment of smallpox. Antiviral Res 2017; 143:269–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Fox T, Gould S, Princy N et al. Therapeutics for treating mpox in humans. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 3:CD015769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Goyal L, Ajmera K, Pandit R, Pandit T. Prevention and Treatment of Monkeypox: A Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Professionals and General Population. Cureus 2022; 14:e28230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Akter F, Hasan TB, Alam F et al. Effect of prior immunisation with smallpox vaccine for protection against human Mpox: A systematic review. Rev Med Virol 2023; 33:e2444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Kumar AM, Chen ST, Merola JF et al. Monkeypox outbreak, vaccination, and treatment implications for the dermatologic patient: Review and interim guidance from the Medical Dermatology Society. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:623–631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Eye Bank Association of America. Informational Alert: Monkeypox and Eye Tissue Donation. https://restoresight.org/news/informational-alert-monkeypox-and-eye-tissue-donation/. Accessed July 9, 2023.