Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is one of the most common and morbid conditions faced by infectious diseases clinicians worldwide, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 18% [1, 2]. Patients receiving long-term hemodialysis are at exceptionally high risk and bear a disproportionate burden of SAB. Recent surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emerging Infections Program found the SAB rate to be 100 times higher among patients receiving hemodialysis than adults not on hemodialysis between 2017 and 2020 [3]. Given an estimated 3.9 million persons receiving kidney replacement therapy worldwide, 69% of whom receive hemodialysis, this is a significant public health dilemma [4].
A variety of strategies have been attempted to reduce the rates of S aureus infections, ranging from nasal decolonization to prophylactic antibiotics in certain situations and even candidate vaccines, with varied success [5]. Perhaps the most influential interventions have focused on increased awareness, standardized care bundles, and adequate catheter maintenance to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) [6, 7], Despite modest gains, SAB remains problematic and further interventions are needed.
In this issue of Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Bryce et al utilized their unique setting in Northern Australia, where trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) 160 mg/800 mg is administered three times weekly after hemodialysis for the purposes of melioidosis prophylaxis during the wet season (November–April), to explore differences in the incidence of SAB between wet and dry seasons [8]. This retrospective, single-center cohort study from 2017–2022 included 1145 patients receiving hemodialysis, of which 52 (17%) developed SAB. The SAB population consisted of 65% females and 75% Aboriginal Australians, with 46% having CRBSI. One third of these S aureus isolates had TMP-SMX resistance, whereas the TMP-SMX resistance per the local antibiogram was only 8%.
The key observation was a 56% decrease in the estimated incidence of SAB among patients receiving hemodialysis during the wet compared to dry season (1528/100,000 person years vs 3438/100,000 person years; incident rate ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.82). Comparatively, patients with SAB not receiving hemodialysis had no seasonal difference in incidence, consistent with Far North Queensland data demonstrating no SAB seasonality [9]. Interestingly, one quarter of the patients who acquired SAB during the wet season were not receiving TMP-SMX prophylaxis, and 29% of all SABs occurred in those receiving TMP-SMX, with nearly half of those isolates retaining TMP-SMX susceptibility.
Important limitations of this study include its single-center, retrospective design that subjects it to potential confounding and a small sample size that may overestimate the effect size. Additionally, the geographically limited practice of periodically administering TMP-SMX makes external validity and replication more challenging. Another consideration is whether hemodialysis-related infection prevention practices (e.g., dressings, antibiotic locks, chlorhexidine use, alcohol-impregnated caps) were optimized; notably, this center has implemented prior antisepsis interventions [10].
TMP-SMX's spectrum of activity includes a broad array of bacteria, fungi, and parasites, serving as a sort of anti-infective “Swiss Army knife,” with prior literature demonstrating off-target reductions in different infections, including S aureus, when utilized as prophylaxis for another indication. In people with advanced HIV in the 1990s, TMP-SMX prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia was associated with a 40% risk reduction in S aureus infections in addition to decreased infections from Haemophilus, Salmonella, and Toxoplasma [11]. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of people with HIV in Côte d’Ivoire, TMP-SMX prophylaxis significantly reduced rates of bacterial pneumonia, Cystoisospora, and malaria [12]. TMP-SMX/heparin lock solution decreased rates of CRBSIs compared to heparin control in an RCT of patients receiving hemodialysis via tunneled catheters [12]. In Northern Australia, wet season TMP-SMX melioidosis prophylaxis was associated with a similar temporal decrease in invasive group A streptococcal infections [13]. In this context, Bryce et al add further evidence for TMP-SMX's versatility to prevent infections in vulnerable populations [8].
The results of this study generate a fascinating question for future research: should TMP-SMX be employed as a prophylactic agent against SAB among patients receiving hemodialysis (or more broadly to other populations at highest risk of SAB)? Evaluating a large population-based infection prevention measure should include a careful assessment of the relative benefits versus potential harms, and lessons can be drawn from other population-level anti-infective interventions.
Despite TMP-SMX’s broad utility, adverse drug effects (ADEs) are numerous, and intolerance is frequently encountered in clinical practice. Although renal toxicities (e.g., hyperkalemia, elevated creatinine) may be less consequential in patients receiving hemodialysis, ADEs include hematologic abnormalities, hepatitis, neuropsychiatric effects, and, rarely, life-threatening allergic reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis [14]. In clinical trials of TMP-SMX used for P jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis for people with HIV, rates of ADE were relatively frequent and increased with the dosage used [15–17]. For example, in Northern Australia, ∼30% of patients did not receive TMP-SMX prophylaxis on hemodialysis because of allergy, intolerance, and logistics [8, 18].
Beyond individual patient-level ADEs, implementing a large-scale antimicrobial prophylactic measure raises concerns about increasing antimicrobial resistance amongst S aureus and other bacteria. Although TMP-SMX is not a first-line agent in the treatment of SAB, it is an important oral agent for S aureus infections, especially methicillin-resistant isolates. Bryce et al found a concerning signal for increased TMP-SMX resistance in patients on hemodialysis compared to the local population, but it is not clear if this is due to TMP-SMX exposure or other baseline differences in comorbidities and antibiotic exposure between populations. Similarly, TMP-SMX prophylaxis in PLWH has been associated with higher rates of TMP-SMX resistant S aureus infections and colonization, as well as concerns for increased resistance to other antibiotic classes among non-S aureus pathogens, including higher rates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Enterobacterales [19, 20]. Evidence for this latter concern appears mixed, however, because a prior systematic review found a signal that TMP-SMX prophylaxis may be protective against resistance to other antibiotics (perhaps via decreasing colonization and infection rates), although the number of studies included was small [21].
Because a definitive answer to the proposed question of whether TMP-SMX should be employed for SAB prophylaxis in patients receiving hemodialysis or at otherwise high risk is challenging without further study, we currently urge caution in implementing these findings in clinical practice yet remain intrigued. A low-cost intervention that may substantially reduce the risk of a highly mortal infection in a vulnerable population is tempting to adopt zealously because the potential adverse events and risk of antibiotic resistance is likely acceptable if a mortality reduction is demonstrated; however, before implementation, this intervention deserves rigorous scientific investigation via a proper RCT to weigh the risks and benefits, given that this intervention has the risk of worsening outcomes. Further studies should evaluate whether nonsystemic antimicrobial prophylactic techniques offer similar or additional benefits to catheter-care bundles (e.g., antibiotic locks, chlorhexidine/mupirocin decolonization), the optimal prophylactic dose and frequency, and further risk stratification to determine if the benefit is limited to select patients receiving hemodialysis (e.g., only hemodialysis catheters vs arteriovenous grafts/fistulas). While awaiting further data, close attention to evidence-based infection prevention measures remains essential.
As a derivative of 1 of the primordial antimicrobials and having perhaps the most impressive spectrum of anti-infective activity in our field spanning multiple biological kingdoms, TMP-SMX has saved innumerable lives preventing and treating numerous common pathogens. Given the burden of SAB, it seems worth considering whether its use could be extended to prophylaxis against SAB in certain high-risk populations. Doing so, however, may have unforeseen consequences, as adding another tool could potentially overburden TMP-SMX's utility as an invaluable “Swiss Army knife.”
Contributor Information
Jonathan H Ryder, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Daniel J Minter, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Notes
Patient Consent Statement. This manuscript does not include factors necessitating patient consent.
Financial support. None.
References
- 1. GBD 2019 Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators . Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 2022; 400:2221–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kourtis AP, Hatfield K, Baggs J, et al. Vital signs: epidemiology and recent trends in methicillin-resistant and in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections—United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68:214–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rha B, See I, Dunham L, et al. Vital signs: health disparities in hemodialysis-associated Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections—United States, 2017-2020. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:676–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bello AK, Okpechi IG, Osman MA, et al. Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022; 18:378–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Troeman DPR, Van Hout D, Kluytmans J. Antimicrobial approaches in the prevention of Staphylococcus aureus infections: a review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74:281–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75(4 Suppl 2):S1–S164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Summary of recommendations: guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:1087–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bryce A, Davison S, Currie BJ, et al. Lower rates of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection in patients on hemodialysis receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole melioidosis prophylaxis. Open Forum Infectious Disease 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Fairhead LJ, Smith S, Sim BZ, et al. The seasonality of infections in tropical Far North Queensland, Australia: a 21-year retrospective evaluation of the seasonal patterns of six endemic pathogens. PLOS Glob Public Health 2022; 2:e0000506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Stewart BJ, Gardiner T, Perry GJ, Tong SY. Reduction in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia rates in patients receiving haemodialysis following alteration of skin antisepsis procedures. J Hosp Infect 2016; 92:191–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Dworkin MS, Williamson J, Jones JL, Kaplan JE. Prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: impact on risk for infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:393–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Anglaret X, Chêne G, Attia A, et al. Early chemoprophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole for HIV-1-infected adults in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: a randomised trial. Cotrimo-CI Study Group. Lancet 1999; 353:1463–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Birrell JM, Boyd R, Currie BJ, et al. Invasive group A streptococcal disease in the Northern Territory and the impact of melioidosis antibiotic prophylaxis. Med J Aust 2022; 217:544–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. FDA . Bactrim. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/017377s067lbl.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2024.
- 15. Bozzette SA, Finkelstein DM, Spector SA, et al. A randomized trial of three antipneumocystis agents in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:693–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. El-Sadr WM, Luskin-Hawk R, Yurik TM, et al. A randomized trial of daily and thrice-weekly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA). Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29:775–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schneider MM, Nielsen TL, Nelsing S, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of two doses of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. Dutch AIDS Treatment Group. J Infect Dis 1995; 171:1632–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Majoni SW, Hughes JT, Heron B, Currie BJ. Trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole reduces rates of melioidosis in high-risk hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep 2018; 3:160–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Blanc P, Bonnet F, Leleux O, et al. Severe bacterial non-AIDS infections in persons with human immunodeficiency virus: the epidemiology and evolution of antibiotic resistance over an 18-year period (2000-2017) in the ANRS CO3 AquiVih-Nouvelle-Aquitaine Cohort. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:1814–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cotton MF, Wasserman E, Smit J, Whitelaw A, Zar HJ. High incidence of antimicrobial resistant organisms including extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nasopharyngeal and blood isolates of HIV-infected children from Cape Town, South Africa. BMC Infect Dis 2008; 8:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sibanda EL, Weller IV, Hakim JG, Cowan FM. Does trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for HIV induce bacterial resistance to other antibiotic classes? Results of a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:1184–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]