Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1990 Jul 1;269(1):115–122. doi: 10.1042/bj2690115

Pattern formation in an immobilized bienzyme system. A morphogenetic model.

S Cortassa 1, H Sun 1, J P Kernevez 1, D Thomas 1
PMCID: PMC1131539  PMID: 2375746

Abstract

Experimental and theoretical studies of a reaction-diffusion model of two immobilized enzymes participating in the cellular acid-base metabolism, namely glutaminase and urease, are presented. The system shows an unstable steady state at pH 6.0, where any perturbation will drive the system towards a more alkaline or more acidic pH, owing to the autocatalytic behaviour with respect to pH exhibited by both enzymes. When diffusion is coupled to reaction by means of immobilization, different patterns of the internal pH profile appear across the membrane. If the bienzymic membrane is subjected to a perturbation at its boundaries, of the same amplitude but in opposite directions, the internal pH evolves through an asymmetric pattern to attain a nearly symmetric distribution of pH. The pH value at the final steady state is more acidic or more alkaline than the initial state according to the initial and boundary conditions. The final nearly symmetric state is attained more rapidly when less enzyme is immobilized (1.8 x 10(-4) M.s-1 as against 3.3 x 10(-4) M.s-1 of total enzyme activity in the membrane volume). The experimental results agree rather well qualitatively with numerical predictions of the model equations.

Full text

PDF
115

Images in this article

120Fig. 4.
on p.120
120Fig. 5.
on p.120
121Fig. 6.
on p.121

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aon M. A., Cortassa S., Hervagault J. F., Thomas D. pH-induced bistable dynamic behaviour in the reaction catalysed by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and conformational hysteresis of the enzyme. Biochem J. 1989 Sep 15;262(3):795–800. doi: 10.1042/bj2620795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aon M., Thomas D., Hervagault J. F. Spatial patterns in a photobiochemical system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jan;86(2):516–519. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.2.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breton J., Thomas D., Hervagault J. F. Experimental evidence for multistability in a photobiochemical system. Eur J Biochem. 1985 Oct 15;152(2):509–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb09225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broun G., Thomas D., Selegny E. Structured bienzymatical models formed by sequential enzymes bound into artificial supports: active glucose transport effect. J Membr Biol. 1972;8(4):313–332. doi: 10.1007/BF01868108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bunow B., Kernevez J. P., Joly G., Thomas D. Pattern formation by reaction-diffusion instabilities: application to morphogenesis in Drosophila. J Theor Biol. 1980 Jun 21;84(4):629–649. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(80)80024-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crick F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature. 1970 Jan 31;225(5231):420–422. doi: 10.1038/225420a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies D. D. Control of and by pH. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1973;27:513–529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Driever W., Nüsslein-Volhard C. A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell. 1988 Jul 1;54(1):83–93. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harrison L. G. What is the status of reaction-diffusion theory thirty-four years after turing? J Theor Biol. 1987 Apr 21;125(4):369–384. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80208-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Malpiece Y., Sharan M., Barbotin J. N., Personne P., Thomas D. Theoretical and experimental study of an immobilized bienzyme system. Computer calculations and electron microscopy visualization of local concentration profiles. J Biol Chem. 1980 Jul 25;255(14):6883–6890. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Naparstek A., Romette J. L., Kernevez J. P., Thomas D. Memory in enzyme membranes. Nature. 1974 May 31;249(456):490–491. doi: 10.1038/249490a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oliver G., Wright C. V., Hardwicke J., De Robertis E. M. A gradient of homeodomain protein in developing forelimbs of Xenopus and mouse embryos. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1017–1024. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90246-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thaller C., Eichele G. Identification and spatial distribution of retinoids in the developing chick limb bud. Nature. 1987 Jun 18;327(6123):625–628. doi: 10.1038/327625a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Winfree A. T. Spiral waves of chemical activity. Science. 1972 Feb 11;175(4022):634–636. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4022.634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wolpert L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J Theor Biol. 1969 Oct;25(1):1–47. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(69)80016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES