Abstract
The significant interest in actinide bonding has recently focused on novel compounds with exotic oxidation states. However, the difficulty in obtaining relevant high-quality experimental data, particularly for low-valent actinide compounds, prevents a deeper understanding of 5f systems. Here we show X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) measurements in the high-energy resolution fluorescence detection (HERFD) mode at the uranium M4 edge for the UIII and UIV halides, namely UX3 and UX4 (X = F, Cl, Br, I). The spectral shapes of these two series exhibit clear differences, which we explain using electronic structure calculations of the 3d-4f resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) process. To understand the changes observed, we implemented crystal field models with ab initio derived parameters and investigated the effect of reducing different contributions to the electron-electron interactions involved in the RIXS process. Our analysis shows that the electron-electron interactions weaken as the ligand changes from I to F, indicative of a decrease in ionicity both along and between the UX3 and UX4 halide series.
Subject terms: Electronic structure of atoms and molecules, Electron transfer
The authors investigate fundamental interactions in low-valent uranium compounds using resonant inelastic X-ray scattering, providing insights into their complex electronic structures and contributing to our understanding of actinide chemistry.
Introduction
Actinide chemistry is richly complex, with the partially filled 5f shell resulting in fascinating and intricate chemical behavior. Additionally, the actinide elements are radioactive, which makes experimental studies more challenging compared to those on non-radioactive materials. In recent years, significant progress has been made in actinide synthetic chemistry, leading to the discovery of several new actinide complexes with exotic oxidation states. These have been identified in elements such as thorium1, uranium2–5, neptunium6, plutonium7,8, berkelium9, californium10, and einsteinium11. In particular, the identification of low-valent actinide compounds has enriched the field and highlighted the need for a deeper understanding of the chemical bond and the specific role of 5f electrons.
Addressing this scientific challenge requires reliable experimental techniques to accurately determine the oxidation states and assess the contributions of specific orbitals to chemical bonding. Oxidation state estimations often rely on indirect methods, such as X-ray diffraction and UV–Vis spectroscopy, which have been used for compounds such as UI, UII, and UIII 2,12,13. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is an alternative technique and has been used to detect the trivalent oxidation state of U14. It is also sensitive to the pentavalent state of uranium but remains unresponsive to the tetravalent and hexavalent states. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) in high-energy resolution fluorescence detection (HERFD) mode combined with resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) at the M4,5 edges is a direct approach to probe oxidation states15–18. The shifts in the energy position of the HERFD-XANES main edge allow for highly sensitive determination of oxidation states due to the combination of good spectral resolution and element selectivity of inner-shell spectroscopy. These advanced techniques are typically conducted at large-scale synchrotron facilities19. The HERFD-XANES method provides improved energy resolution over conventional XANES by integrating only the maximum characteristic fluorescence emitted by the sample. An X-ray emission spectrometer20 analyses the emitted X-rays, selecting the maximum intensity of the emission line with an energy resolution of ~1 eV. This enhanced resolution is particularly significant at the M4,5 edges of actinides, making HERFD-XANES a fundamental tool in actinide science15–18,21–24 since its first application15. The shifts in the energy position of the HERFD-XANES main edge allow for highly sensitive determination of oxidation states due to the combination of good spectral resolution and element selectivity of inner-shell spectroscopy. Additionally, the shape of the HERFD-XANES spectrum provides valuable information about the local structure near the actinide atom, which can be further interpreted with the help of electronic structure calculations.
It should be noted that the sensitivity of the HERFD-XANES and RIXS at the M4,5 edges to the nature of the actinide bond, particularly to covalency, remains an open question and a topic of intense research in the field of actinide chemistry. While ligand K-edge XANES can directly measure the ligand–metal mixing25–27, identifying the effects of bond formation and charge-density redistribution at the M4,5 edges is more challenging due to the lack of systematic studies. HERFD-XANES method at the U M4 edge, which probes the 5f states, has been used to determine the UIV, UV, and UVI oxidation states of various uranium compounds15–17. However, there is a lack of experimental data for low-valent compounds. To the best of our knowledge, no HERFD-XANES data at the M4 edge have been reported for oxidation states below UIV. Therefore, the sensitivity of this method to low valence states has yet to be established. Uranium halide systems are ideal to determine the sensitivity of HERFD-XANES to low oxidation states and to investigate the role of electron correlations and of strongly electronegative ligands. They are frequently used in fundamental research to understand the nature of actinide bonding28–34.
Electronic structure calculations are helpful in interpreting HERFD-XANES and RIXS data and extracting detailed information about the electronic transitions and the nature of the chemical bond35–51. The RIXS process is described by the Kramers-Heisenberg equation, which can be calculated using different computational approaches. In the field of RIXS on actinide systems, the most used framework has been the ligand field multiplet theory which allows to include atomic, crystal field, and charge transfer effects35,43,47,48,50. Recently, there has been an interest in applying relativistic multi-configurational approaches to calculate HERFD-XANES49,51,52 and RIXS46 on actinides. Moreover, it has been shown that, under certain simplifying assumptions, RIXS can be understood as a convolution of the occupied and unoccupied density of states16,37,41.
In this work, we show HERFD-XANES spectra at the U M4 edge for the families of UIII and UIV halides, namely UX3 and UX4 (X = F, Cl, Br, I). Experimental data on UX3 and UX4 is analyzed with the help of crystal field multiplet calculations, where the electron-electron correlations between the 5f electrons, the 3d, and the 4f core-holes involved in the process are taken into account. For low-valent uranium systems, electron-electron correlations are expected to be stronger than interactions with neighboring atoms, which defined our choice of theoretical approach. Altogether, this study reports the first M4 edge HERFD-XANES and RIXS recorded on UIII compounds, confirming the method’s sensitivity to low-valent oxidation state, and provides a detailed analysis of the role of electron-electron interactions and ligand effects in shaping the 5f electronic structure for the UX3 and UX4 halides series.
Results
Figure 1 shows the experimental HERFD-XANES data for the families of UX3 and UX4 halides and the RIXS data of UCl3 as a contour map in a plane of incident energy and energy transfer. The latter represents the energy difference between the incident and the emitted photon energies. Color variations in the plot are due to different scattering intensities. As shown schematically in Fig. 1, RIXS is a two-step process. In the first step, an electron is promoted to an empty orbital following the absorption of an incident photon. At the U M4 edge, this is given by an excitation of a 3d3/2 electron to the 5f5/2 shell. In the second step, the core-hole is filled by a core electron, and the energy is released as an emitted X-ray photon. At the U M4 edge, this is given by a 4f5/2 electron (Mβ emission line). Experimentally, the RIXS process is measured by scanning the incident energy across the M4 absorption edge, and for each incident energy, the characteristic emission line is recorded with the X-ray emission spectrometer. The shape of the U M4 RIXS arises from the allowed electronic transitions between the manifolds of multi-electronic states originating from the electronic configurations of the ground, intermediate, and final states.
The HERFD-XANES spectra correspond to the diagonal cut in the RIXS map taken at the maximum of the Mβ (4f5/2–3d3/2) emission line. Figure 1b shows the recorded HERFD-XANES data for the UX3 and UX4 sets, revealing significant differences. The III oxidation state of U in UX3 results in a ~ 1.6 eV shift of the white line to a lower energy compared to UIV. This represents the largest white line shift at the U M4 edge for a unitary change of the oxidation state. In the UIV-UV-UVI series, the white line shifts are in the order of ~1 eV15,17. The shapes of the UIII and UIV spectra are also significantly different. While UCl4 (Fig. 1b, bottom) shows only one main peak at ~3725.15 eV, UCl3 (Fig. 1b, top) exhibits a splitting in the white line at ~3723.55 eV and ~3725 eV. Such splitting can be clearly seen in the RIXS plane of Fig. 1a, where two well-separated resonances are observed along the diagonal. As will be shown, the same splitting is well-reproduced in the calculated RIXS for UIII by considering the atomic interactions of a 5f3 configuration.
Changes are also present within each halide series. Along with a double profile, UX3 HERFD-XANES spectra show intensity redistribution among the two features depending on the halide ligand. Changes in the UX4 set (Fig. 1b, bottom) are less pronounced but still present. Small shifts in the HERFD-XANES maximum were observed together with differences in intensity and shape of the white line induced by the halide ligands. The trends of the UX4 HERFD-XANES spectra through the halide series can be summarized as follows: there is a lowering in intensity of the main peak and a decrease of the shoulder at ~3727 eV going from F to I, accompanied by an energy shift to lower energies, with the HERFD-XANES maximums of UF4 (3725.2 eV) and UI4 (3724.9 eV) differing by ~0.3 eV.
To understand the spectral changes observed between UX3 and UX4 and within each series, we performed electronic structure calculations. The choice of the method of calculation depends on which approximations are more appropriate for the system under study. In our case, an additional electron is excited into the already partially filled and localized 5f-shell, which means that electron correlations within the 5f-shell and with the core-hole will be strong. As there are strong correlations, a description considering the multiple effects is a good approach53. Here, we use crystal field multiplet calculations as implemented in the Quanty code54. In the model, we consider the atomic picture with a single U atom and the number of electrons in the relevant shells of the spectroscopic process.
The full RIXS process was calculated, and the extraction of the HERFD-XANES was made through the diagonal cut corresponding to the maximum of the emission line. The core-to-core 3d-4f RIXS maps are calculated considering the transitions between the 5fn → 3d95fn+1 → 4f135fn+1 electronic configurations, with n = 2 for UIV and n = 3 for UIII. The interactions among 5f electrons and between 5f electrons and the 3d and 4f core-holes are described in terms of the Slater-Condon integrals (Fk, Gk). In the RIXS calculations, the spin-orbit (ζ), the radial Coulomb integrals (Fk), the exchange integrals (Gk), and the applied crystal field define the multiplets of the ground state 5fn, intermediate-state 3d95fn+1, and final-state 4f135fn+1 configurations, as detailed in ref. 43. The values of the Slater-Condon integrals and spin-orbit coupling constants used in the calculations are presented in Supplementary Table 1.
To fundamentally understand the role of specific electronic interactions involved in the spectroscopic process and the origin of the observed features in the RIXS map, we performed an investigation in which we neglected the contributions of the electron-electron interactions in the intermediate and final states of the RIXS process (i.e., the Slater-Condon integrals) in turn. Results for the UIII ion are shown in Fig. 2, while Supplementary Table 2 summarizes the ab initio Hartree−Fock values and the reduction factors of the Slater-Condon integrals used in this exercise. Figure 2a shows the theoretical RIXS map of UIII when all electron-electron interactions are considered and reduced at 80% of their atomic value, which is the standard procedure when computing ions embedded in a compound. Figure 2b, c show the theoretical RIXS maps when all electron-electron interactions (among 5f and between 5f and the core-hole) are switched off in the intermediate (Fig. 2b) and final (Fig. 2c) states of the spectroscopic process. For all cases, the RIXS main feature has a double profile (transitions at ∼386 eV and ∼388 eV on the energy transfer scale), which results in the splitting of the white line for the diagonal cut, giving the HERFD-XANES. This clarifies that the presence of two peaks in the UIII systems is a fundamental characteristic of a 5f3 configuration as probed by the M4 RIXS process.
In addition to the main features, two other transitions can be seen below (∼381 eV) and above (∼392 eV) for the atomic calculations (Fig. 2a). When the intermediate-state interactions are neglected (Fig. 2b), these transitions remain nearly in the same position. On the other hand, when the final-state interactions are turned off (Fig. 2c), they overlap with the main feature in the RIXS map. Therefore, the final-state electronic configuration in the RIXS process plays a very important role in the ∼381 eV and ∼392 eV transitions of the standard RIXS map of UIII (Fig. 2a). More specifically, such transitions mostly depend on the values of the exchange integrals Gk(4f,5f) and are due to the interactions between the 4f core-hole and the 5f electrons, as previously observed in ref. 43. Indeed, if only the Coulomb integrals Fk(4f,5f) are neglected (see Supplementary Fig. 1), the satellite features are still present in the RIXS map. Similar results are observed for UIV compounds (5f2 ground state), where additional features overlap with the main features when final-state electron-electron interactions are neglected. Simultaneously, the intensity and shape of the main feature change (see Supplementary Fig. 2).
In order to reproduce the experimental changes observed and understand the fundamental processes underlying the spectral features, we calculate the atomic RIXS maps for 5f3 and 5f2 electronic configurations and extract the theoretical UIII and UIV M4 HERFD-XANES spectra by cutting along the diagonal crossing of the maximum of the RIXS maps. In this approach, the Slater-Condon integrals are scaled to 80% of their atomic values to account for the reduced strength of electron-electron interactions in the compounds. The scaling factor is further tuned to improve the agreement with the data, with optimal values found between 70% and 85%. Figure 3 shows the best agreement obtained for UCl3 and UCl4. The Slater-Condon integrals were scaled to 85% and 76% of their atomic values for UCl3 and UCl4, respectively. The reduction factor (e.g., 85% in UCl3) was kept constant at 85% for UCl3 and 76% for UCl4 for the initial, intermediate, and final states of the RIXS process. Figure 3a, b show the experimental HERFD-XANES compared to the theoretical one obtained by cutting the calculated RIXS of Fig. 3c, d, respectively. These two examples of HERFD-XANES and RIXS data recorded on U–Cl systems highlight the spectral differences when the ligand remains the same and the oxidation state is changed. Trivalent and tetravalent U differ significantly from one another due to the additional 5f electron that makes UIII have a richer multiplet structure than UIV. In particular, UIII exhibits a double peak profile (features A and B in Fig. 3a), while UIV has a single main feature followed by a shoulder where two bumps can be distinguished for UCl4 (Fig. 3b). Our atomic multiplet calculations reproduce these characteristic line shapes very well, indicating that it is mainly the electron-electron interactions that determine the shape of the HERFD-XANES spectra48.
To determine whether the spectral changes observed within the UIII and UIV series correlate with the change in the local environment, we performed multiple calculations using a crystal field model. In this approach, the effect of the local environment is approximated by a static potential perturbing the spherical symmetry of the ion and lifting the degeneracy of the 5f orbitals. The local structure of the UIV and UIII systems are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. To model the crystal field as accurately as possible, the crystal field parameters describing the splitting of the 5f orbitals were extracted from ab initio calculations. The band structure of each halide system was calculated using Density Functional Theory (DFT) as implemented in the Full Potential Local-Orbital (FPLO) code55. The band structure was then projected onto localized Wannier orbitals and the Hamiltonian was diagonalized to extract the parameters for implementing the crystal field. Further details about the computation method can be found in the Supplementary Information. Surprisingly, if the Slater-Condon integrals are kept at the same value for all compounds, the addition of the crystal field term does not significantly change the shape of the HERFD-XANES spectra (see Supplementary Fig. 3c). The comparison between the atomic and crystal field models for the UX3 and UX4 systems is shown in Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5, and the splitting of the 5f orbitals due to the crystal field is presented in Supplementary Fig. 6.
Table 1.
Table 2.
Moreover, to understand the effect of the coordination number (CN) and local geometry on the observed changes of the UX4 systems, we made a simple computational test by calculating the UIV M4 edge HERFD-XANES for UCl4 and UBr4 structures where Cl and Br were substituted with F. In this way, we obtained U coordinated with 8 and 7 fluorine ligands. The results (see Supplementary Fig. 7) show that the spectra for F in the structure of UF4, UCl4, and UBr4 are almost identical, which rules out the significance of the coordination number as a relevant parameter.
The best agreement between data and calculations obtained for the UX4 series (X = F, Cl, Br) are presented in Fig. 4. Figure 4a compares each calculated spectrum to the experimental one to show the excellent agreement reached for each sample. In Fig. 4b, the UX4 set of experimental spectra is shown superimposed and compared with the set of calculations to highlight the similarity among the trends observed in the experiment and theory. In order to have an estimation of the agreement, in Fig. 4b the spectral differences relative to UF4 are shown at the bottom of each set. The calculations reproduce well the trends observed in the experiment. In particular, the shifts of the HERFD-XANES maximum to lower energies, the intensity variations of the white line, and the shoulder at ~3727 eV.
Starting from the values that well reproduced the spectrum of UF4, i.e., 70%, the Slater-Condon integrals were increased to 76%, 80%, and 85% to match the UCl4, UBr4, and UI4, respectively, for the initial, intermediate, and final states. It should be noted that no shift and re-normalization were applied to the calculated spectra, meaning that the spectral differences are purely induced by the change in parameter values. The reduction of the Slater-Condon integrals from the common value of 80% is usually interpreted as an indication of bond covalency. This is because covalency increases the delocalization of bonding electrons, resulting in the reduced strength of their mutual interactions.
To evaluate whether the spectral trends in the set of UIV systems can be correlated to a significant change in covalency/ionicity as indicated by the 15% variation of the Slater-Condon integrals, we carried out Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM) analysis, an electron density topological analysis proposed by Bader56. The magnitude of the electron density at the bond critical points (ρBCP) and its Laplacian () at the bond critical point between the U atom and the halogen ligand, as calculated using QTAIM, are shown in Table 3. When BCPs are employed to characterize the nature of a chemical interaction, ρBCP < 0.2 a.u. with > 0 indicates a non-covalent interaction57.
Table 3.
System | ρBCP (a.u.) | (a.u.) |
---|---|---|
UF4 | 0.076 | 0.293 |
UCl4 | 0.053 | 0.114 |
UBr4 | 0.052 | 0.092 |
UI4 | 0.048 | 0.061 |
UCl3 | 0.034 | 0.091 |
UBr3 | 0.030 | 0.068 |
UI3 | 0.029 | 0.048 |
The spectral trends observed for the UX4 set, mainly related to the intensity variation and the position of the main HERFD-XANES peak, correlate with the values of the ρBCP. Such results show that the halide bonds are characterized by ionic interactions (ρBCP < 0.2 a.u.), with the degree of ionic character decreasing from UI4 (ρBCP = 0.048 a.u.) to UF4 (ρBCP = 0.076 a.u.). We therefore interpret the lower values of the Slater-Condon integrals for UF4 as evidence that fluorine ligands are more effective in perturbing the electronic structure of U, with the highest increase in the degree of delocalization of the 5f electrons when compared to the other halides. Although ρBCP values show that all U–X bonds are intrinsically ionic, the observed trends inside the ionic series show that the U-F bond has the highest covalent character, in agreement with previous theoretical studies on UX6 halide complexes30,32,33. It is worth noting that according to theoretical studies on U chlorides, the bonding character is strongly dependent on the oxidation state of the metal, with greater ionicity found in low-valent compounds31. Therefore, one expects an increased localization of 5f orbitals as the U oxidation state is lowered from IV to III. This was tested by QTAIM analysis (Table 3), which shows a decrease in the ρBCP values as the oxidation state decreases, confirming that UIII systems have a higher ionicity than UIV systems.
The case of the UX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) set is very peculiar. Figure 5 shows the best agreement between experiment (Fig. 5a) and theory (Fig. 5b) for the UIII systems, and Table 2 provides their local structure. The following discussion will consider only the UCl3 and UBr3 compounds, given that they are isostructural. The experimental spectra of the UX3 set have a double profile, with the intensity of the features varying depending on the halide ligand, as previously discussed in Fig. 1b. Considering the lack of experimental data on UIII compounds and the strong tendency of trivalent U to oxidize, the reliability of the measurements and the possibility of beam induced oxidation on the spectra should be examined. The position of the second peak of the UIII spectrum corresponds to the energy position of the white line of UIV data (see Fig. 1a). Although a small effect of radiation damage cannot be totally excluded, the spectral differences between UCl3 and UBr3 are beyond radiation damage for the following reasons: the measurements were performed twice under cryogenic conditions, with two sets of different samples, and the same results were obtained. The peak intensities remain the same for data collected on UBr3 using different configurations of the spectrometer (see Supplementary Fig. 8). Our calculations already proved that the double peak profile of UIII is characteristic of the 5f3 configuration, a behavior that was previously observed in PuIII compounds (see Supplementary Fig. 9b) where the second HERFD-XANES feature in the PuIII system is also situated at the same energy as the PuIV peak and was proven to have a different origin24. It is worth noting that PuIII is more stable than UIII, ensuring that the double profile is not correlated with beam damage. Therefore, the aforementioned arguments allow us to claim that the differences observed in the UIII measured spectra are beyond beam damage effects.
To reproduce the differences observed between UCl3 and UBr3, we first used the same approach that successfully reproduced the UX4 series. However, tuning the Slater-Condon integrals using the same reduction factor for the initial, intermediate, and final-state of the RIXS process did not reproduce the effect of intensity variations of the feature B (see Supplementary Fig. 10). Therefore, the effect of reducing different contributions to the electron-electron interactions involved in the RIXS process was investigated to understand the spectral changes. It was found that strong variations in the final-state interactions provide good agreement with experimental data. While keeping all Slater-Condon integrals at 85% of their atomic values resulted in good agreement with the experimental spectrum for UCl3, the calculation that best reproduced the data for UBr3 was the one in which the contributions to the electron-electron interactions involved in the final-state of the RIXS process were kept to 30% of their atomic value (see Fig. 5b). These results suggest that the interaction of the 4f core-hole and the 5f electrons in the final-state, described by the exchange integrals, is strongly affected by the halide ligand in the UX3 series. The halide ligand would be more effective in screening the 4f core-hole in the case of UBr3 compared to the case of UCl3. As the data presented here is the first experimental HERFD-XANES at the M4 edge of UIII, further investigation is needed to clarify if the pronounced effect of the ligand on the final-state electron-correlations is specific to halides or more general.
Discussion
The combined experimental and theoretical approach proves the extreme sensitivity of HERFD-XANES and RIXS to probe low oxidation states in complex uranium-containing compounds. The UIII spectra are characterized by a double profile, while UIV spectra have one white line resonance. Compared to UIV species, UIII spectra are shifted to lower energies by ~1.6 eV, the highest edge-shift registered for U systems at the M4 edge. In low-valent uranium compounds, the 5f electronic structure is not expected to contribute substantially to the bonding, and one would rather expect the M4 edge HERFD-XANES to be insensitive to the system-specific stereochemistry, in analogy to the M4,5 edge XANES of trivalent lanthanides. Contrary to expectations, spectral changes are observed within each series. The UX4 and UX3 data reveal a degree of 5f sensitivity to the specific local environment. The experimental changes are well-reproduced by calculations of HERFD-XANES in the framework of crystal field multiplet theory, where the crystal field parameters were extracted ab initio and the Slater-Condon integrals reduced to 70%–85% of their atomic value. Interestingly, the results of the calculations highlight that the trends observed are mostly driven by the change in electron-electron interactions rather than by the lift of the 5f degeneracy induced by the crystal field. In other words, in low-valent U compounds the 5f electrons feel the local environment because it modulates their degree of localization.
This observation raises many questions regarding newly synthesized UII and UI systems. The influence of ligands on the distribution of electron density might have a significant impact also on UII and UI compounds. To address this hypothesis, there is a need to probe electron transitions and electron densities using experimental methods in high-energy resolution mode. It would also be beneficial to simultaneously examine the actinide ion and ligand ions and to extensively investigate the electronic structure of the ligands.
Methods
Experimental characterization
M4 edge RIXS and HERFD-XANES spectra were collected at the beamline BM20 (The Rossendorf Beamline) of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF)58. Samples were sealed under anoxic conditions in a dedicated cell with 12-micron Kapton film and transported to the beamline under cryogenic conditions. Measurements were performed under a cryostream cooler (Oxford Cryosystem 700). The incident beam energy was selected using a Si(111) double crystal monochromator, and the incident beam was calibrated by setting the maximum of the U M4 absorption white line of UO2 reference sample to 3725 eV. The energy was scanned between 3721 eV and 3736 eV for UX4 compounds and between 3718 eV and 3736 eV for UX3 compounds. XANES spectra were measured in HERFD mode by recording the intensity at the maximum of the U Mβ emission line (4f5/2 → 3d3/2) as a function of the incident energy, with a total energy resolution of ~0.7 eV. The RIXS data was measured by scanning the incident energy at different emission energies around the Mβ emission line, near the U M4 edge. The emission energy was selected by an X-ray emission spectrometer equipped with five spherically bent Si(220) crystal analyzers with a 1.0 m bending radius at a Bragg angle of 75° in a vertical Rowland geometry20. The detected intensity was recorded by a Ketek detector with a 10 mm diameter and 450 mm Si thickness. Radiation tests were performed on each sample in the UX3 and UX4 series by repeated counts of 0.1 s to check if any variation of the intensity took place.
RIXS and HERFD calculations
The 3d-4f RIXS maps were calculated using multiplet calculations as implemented in the Quanty software library54 starting from an input file generated using the Crispy graphical user interface59. The model included atomic and crystal field contributions. The values of the Slater-Condon integrals, i.e., the electrostatic (Fk) and exchange (Gk) interactions, and the spin-orbit coupling constants for the ground, intermediate, and final electronic configurations of the 3d-4f RIXS process are provided in Supplementary Table 1. The calculated RIXS maps were convoluted with a Lorentzian function to account for the lifetime broadening of the intermediate and final states, with a half-width at half-maximum (HWHM) of 3.54 eV and 0.28 eV, respectively. The maps were additionally broadened with a Gaussian function with HWHM of 0.6 eV to simulate the experimental response function. The HERFD spectra were subsequently extracted as cuts of the calculated RIXS maps along the incident energy axis at the constant emitted energy at the maximum of the RIXS intensity. The crystal field term was added to include the influence of local coordination and ligand type on the spectral changes. Details related to the process of extracting the required crystal field parameters are presented in the Supplementary Information.
Inclusion of crystal field contributions in the multiplet calculations
To estimate the effects of local coordination and orbital energetics on the 5f orbitals of UIV and UIII halides, density functional theory calculations (DFT) were performed for all UX4 and UX3 halides considered in the manuscript. Self-consistent calculations were carried out using the Full Potential Local-Orbital code (FPLO)55, with the PBE density functional in a scalar relativistic approach. The Brillouin zones were sampled using a regular 12 x 12 x 12 k-point mesh.
Electronic band structures were calculated for all halide systems and projected on localized Wannier orbitals (see Supplementary Fig. 11a). The local basis set included U 5f, 6d, 7s, and the halide p orbitals (2p, 3p, 4p, and 5p for F, Cl, Br, and I, respectively). Following the Wannierization process, we extracted a numerical representation of the crystal field Hamiltonian on the basis of symmetric function (Supplementary Fig. 11b). The values reflect the influence of the local environment on the 5f orbitals (symmetry, ligand type, and bond distances). Finally, we performed a one-to-one mapping of the numerical Hamiltonian with an analytical version we obtained from the Quanty documentation to extract the parameters that describe the crystal field in different point group symmetries.
The crystal field parameters obtained from the Wannierization process were used to calculate the 3d-4f RIXS maps using the semi-empirical multiplet theory as implemented in the Quanty software library54. The 3d-4f RIXS spectra were calculated considering the actual point group symmetries of the compounds: C2 for UF4, UBr4, and UI4, D4h for UCl4, and C3 for UBr3 and UCl3.
Quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) calculations
The Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM) metrics, ρ and were calculated using the Critic260 code using the electron density calculated using the ORCA package61. The structural models required by the ORCA calculation were extracted from the crystallographic structure of the compounds. The models include the uranium atom and the atoms from the first coordination shell. Extensive tests using larger clusters showed that QTAIM metrics are insensitive to the presence of atoms that extend beyond the halogens directly bound to uranium. Technical details related to the ORCA and Critic2 calculations can be found in the Supplementary Information.
Synthesis of UX4 (X = F, Cl, Br, I)
All operations with UF6 were performed in either stainless steel (316 L) or Monel metal Schlenk lines, which were passivated with 100% fluorine at various pressures before use. Preparations were carried out in an atmosphere of dry and purified argon (5.0, Praxair) using high-vacuum glass lines or a glovebox (MBraun), if not stated differently. Hydrogen fluoride (99%, Hoechst) was dried over K2NiF6 prior to its use. The well-educated reader is aware that F2, HF, and UF6 can be dangerous if not properly handled. Uranium compounds are radioactive and should therefore not be ingested. Sulfur is safe at ambient conditions.
Preparation of UF462
In a typical reaction, sublimed S8 (455 mg, 14.2 mmol) was placed in a perfluorinated ethylene-propylene copolymer (FEP) reaction tube and heated in vacuo several times. Approximately 2 mL of anhydrous HF was added by vacuum distillation. The suspension was frozen with liquid nitrogen and UF6 (3.27 g, 9.29 mmol) was distilled onto it. The reaction mixture was slowly warmed, and the reaction began at the melting point of HF. The supernatant solution turned bluish for a few seconds, then brown with the formation of a greyish solid. After two to three days of reaction time at room temperature, a green solid formed, with a colorless supernatant HF solution. The solvent and volatile reaction products were distilled into a separate FEP reaction tube and the crude product was transferred into a flame-dried glass Schlenk tube. The tube was attached to a vacuum line and residual S8 was sublimed off in a fine vacuum at approximately 350 °C. The yield of UF4 is quantitative with respect to UF6.
Preparation of UCl4, UBr4 and UI463
Aluminum chloride and bromide (Merck, 98%/ Alfa Aesar, 98%) were purified by sublimation in vacuo. Iodine was sublimed in vacuo twice, the first time from phosphorous pentoxide. Aluminum (Fluka, purum >99%), as well as uranyl nitrate (Riedel de Haën, zur Analyze), were used as supplied. All glass vessels were made of borosilicate glass and flame-dried under vacuum before use. For the syntheses, glass ampoules were used as shown in Supplementary Fig. 13.
Preparation of UO2
26.2 g of UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (52 mmol) were decomposed to 14.5 g U3O8 (17 mmol) by heating to 700 °C in air for 7 h inside an open fused silica test tube. The black product was powdered in air and reduced in a stream of hydrogen at 800 °C for 8 h to obtain 13.8 g (51 mmol, 98 %) of phase pure UO2.
Preparation of UCl4
An ampoule was charged with 1.080 g UO2 (4 mmol) and 1.066.7 + 0.177 g AlCl3 (8 mmol + transport agent) and flame sealed under vacuum (1·10–3 mbar). The starting products were reacted at 250 °C for 5 h before the transport reaction was conducted with a source temperature of 350 °C and a sink temperature of 250 °C. 1.476 g (3.9 mmol, 97 %) of dark green crystals of UCl4 were extracted after three days of transport.
Preparation of UBr4
An ampoule was charged with 544 mg UO2 (2 mmol) and 1075 + 65 mg AlBr3 (4 mmol + transport agent) and flame sealed under vacuum (1·10–3 mbar). The starting products were reacted at 250 °C for 12 h before the transport reaction was conducted with a source temperature of 350 °C and a sink temperature of 230 °C. 991 mg (2.2 mmol, 88 %) of large brown plate-shaped crystals were extracted after 6 days.
Preparation of UI4
An ampoule was charged with 270 mg UO2 (1 mmol), 65 mg Al (2.4 mmol), and 2670 mg I2 (10.5 mmol) and flame sealed under vacuum (1·10–3 mbar). The starting products were reacted at 150 °C for 1 h to prevent a too vigorous reaction of Al and I2 followed by 350 °C for 6 h before the transport reaction was conducted with a source temperature of 450 °C and a sink temperature of 300 °C. 607 mg (0.8 mmol, 81 %) of black lath-like crystals were extracted after eight days.
Synthesis of UX3 (X = Cl, Br, I)64
For the synthesis of UCl3, UBr3, and UI3, ampoules similar to those used for the synthesis of the UIV halides were used. The size should be such that a consistent temperature is achieved over the whole length during the reaction and that after the reaction a temperature gradient can be applied for the chemical vapor transport. Ampoules of about 100 mm in length, 19 mm outer diameter, and 1.3 mm wall thickness suit our tubular furnaces. These ampoules are equipped with a NS14 ground joint for flame drying and sealing. A constriction in the middle of the ampoule is used for the facilitated breakup of the ampoule and prevents the mixing of byproducts in the sink with products in the source. The ampoules are filled with a long funnel in a glovebox, to prevent soiling the sink as well as the sealing constraint with non-volatile substances.
Preparation of UCl3
An ampoule was charged with 1000 mg of finely ground UCl4 (2.633 mmol, 20 mg excess) and 18.12 mg Si (0.645 mmol) and flame sealed under vacuum (1·10–3 mbar). The starting materials were reacted at 450 °C for 20 days before the transport reaction was conducted with a source temperature of 350 °C and a sink temperature of 250 °C, to remove the excess UCl4. The yield is quantitative with respect to silicon.
Preparation of UBr3
An ampoule was charged with 1000 mg of finely ground UBr4 (1.793 mmol, 20 mg excess) and 12.34 mg Si (0.440 mmol) and flame sealed under vacuum (1·10–3 mbar). The starting materials were reacted at 400 °C for 14 days before the transport reaction was conducted with a source temperature of 350 °C and a sink temperature of 230 °C, to remove the excess UBr4. The yield is quantitative with respect to silicon.
Preparation of UI3
An ampoule was charged with 1000 mg of finely ground UI4 (1.341 mmol, 20 mg excess) and 9.23 mg Si (0.329 mmol) and flame sealed under vacuum (1·10–3 mbar). The starting materials were reacted at 450 °C for 7 days before the transport reaction was conducted with a source temperature of 450 °C and a sink temperature of 300 °C. The yield is quantitative with respect to silicon.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Rossendorf Beamline of the ESRF for providing beamtime and J. Exner, D. Naudet, and N. Baumann for their computational and technical support during the experiments. This research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under grant agreement No. 759696 (K.O.K.).
Author contributions
The work was conceived and designed by K.O.K.; F.K. and T.G. synthesized samples at Philipps-Universität Marburg; S.W. sealed synthesized materials at HZDR under anoxic conditions and transported them to the beamline at ESRF; K.O.K. and E.F.B. performed HERFD and RIXS measurements at ROBL of ESRF; C.L.S. carried out the theoretical calculations and analyzed the experimental data together with L.A. and M.R.; C.L.S., L.A., and K.O.K. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
The data generated in this study have been deposited in the Zenodo database under accession code 10.5281/zenodo.12706853.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
L. Amidani, Email: lucia.amidani@esrf.fr
K. O. Kvashnina, Email: kristina.kvashnina@esrf.fr
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-50924-7.
References
- 1.Boronski, J. T. et al. A crystalline tri-thorium cluster with σ-aromatic metal–metal bonding. Nature598, 72–75 (2021). 10.1038/s41586-021-03888-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.MacDonald, M. R. et al. Identification of the +2 oxidation state for uranium in a crystalline molecular complex, [K(2.2.2-Cryptand)][(C 5 H 4 SiMe 3) 3 U]. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 13310–13313 (2013). 10.1021/ja406791t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.La Pierre, H. S., Kameo, H., Halter, D. P., Heinemann, F. W. & Meyer, K. Coordination and redox isomerization in the reduction of a uranium(III) monoarene complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.53, 7154–7157 (2014). 10.1002/anie.201402048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wooles, A. J. et al. Uranium(III)-carbon multiple bonding supported by arene δ-bonding in mixed-valence hexauranium nanometre-scale rings. Nat. Commun.9, 2097 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-04560-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barluzzi, L., Giblin, S. R., Mansikkamäki, A. & Layfield, R. A. Identification of oxidation state +1 in a molecular uranium complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 18229–18233 (2022). 10.1021/jacs.2c06519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dutkiewicz, M. S. et al. Organometallic neptunium(III) complexes. Nat. Chem.8, 797–802 (2016). 10.1038/nchem.2520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kvashnina, K. O. et al. A novel metastable pentavalent plutonium solid phase on the pathway from aqueous plutonium(VI) to PuO2 nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 17558–17562 (2019). 10.1002/anie.201911637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cary, S. K. et al. Incipient class II mixed valency in a plutonium solid-state compound. Nat. Chem.9, 856–861 (2017). 10.1038/nchem.2777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gaiser, A. N. et al. Creation of an unexpected plane of enhanced covalency in cerium(III) and berkelium(III) terpyridyl complexes. Nat. Commun.12, 7230 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-021-27576-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Polinski, M. J. et al. Unusual structure, bonding and properties in a californium borate. Nat. Chem.6, 387–392 (2014). 10.1038/nchem.1896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carter, K. P. et al. Structural and spectroscopic characterization of an einsteinium complex. Nature590, 85–88 (2021). 10.1038/s41586-020-03179-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Avens, L. R. et al. A convenient entry into trivalent actinide chemistry: synthesis and characterization of AnI3(THF)4 and An[N(SiMe3)2]3 (An = U, Np, Pu). Inorg. Chem.33, 2248–2256 (1994). 10.1021/ic00088a030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Keener, M. et al. Multielectron redox chemistry of uranium by accessing the +II oxidation state and enabling reduction to a U(I) synthon. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 16271–16283 (2023). 10.1021/jacs.3c05626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boreen, M. A. et al. A uranium tri-rhenium triple inverse. Sandwich Compound. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 5144–5148 (2019). 10.1021/jacs.9b01331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kvashnina, K. O., Butorin, S. M., Martin, P. & Glatzel, P. Chemical state of complex uranium oxides. Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 253002 (2013). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.253002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kvashnina, K. O., Kvashnin, Y. O. & Butorin, S. M. Role of resonant inelastic X-ray scattering in high-resolution core-level spectroscopy of actinide materials. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.194, 27–36 (2014). 10.1016/j.elspec.2014.01.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leinders, G., Bes, R., Pakarinen, J., Kvashnina, K. & Verwerft, M. Evolution of the uranium chemical state in mixed-valence oxides. Inorg. Chem.56, 6784–6787 (2017). 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kvashnina, K. O. & Butorin, S. M. High-energy resolution X-ray spectroscopy at actinide M 4,5 and ligand K edges: what we know, what we want to know, and what we can know. Chem. Commun.58, 327–342 (2022). 10.1039/D1CC04851A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Caciuffo, R. & Lander, G. H. X-ray synchrotron radiation studies of actinide materials. J. Synchrotron Radiat.28, 1692–1708 (2021). 10.1107/S1600577521009413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kvashnina, K. O. & Scheinost, A. C. A Johann-type X-ray emission spectrometer at the Rossendorf beamline. J. Synchrotron Radiat.23, 836–841 (2016). 10.1107/S1600577516004483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vitova, T. et al. Polarization dependent high energy resolution X-ray absorption study of dicesium uranyl tetrachloride. Inorg. Chem.54, 174–182 (2015). 10.1021/ic5020016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bès, R. et al. Use of HERFD–XANES at the U L 3—and M 4—edges to determine the uranium valence state on [Ni(H 2 O) 4] 3 [U(OH,H 2 O)(UO 2) 8 O 12 (OH) 3]. Inorg. Chem.55, 4260–4270 (2016). 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hunault, M. O. J. Y. et al. Speciation change of uranyl in lithium borate glasses. Inorg. Chem.58, 6858–6865 (2019). 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gerber, E. et al. To form or not to form: PuO2 nanoparticles at acidic pH. Environ. Sci. Nano9, 1509–1518 (2022). 10.1039/D1EN00666E [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Minasian, S. G. et al. Determining relative f and d orbital contributions to M–Cl covalency in MCl 62– (M = Ti, Zr, Hf, U) and UOCl 5—using Cl K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy and time-dependent density functional theory. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134, 5586–5597 (2012). 10.1021/ja2105015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Su, J. et al. Energy-degeneracy-driven covalency in actinide bonding. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 17977–17984 (2018). 10.1021/jacs.8b09436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sergentu, D.-C. & Autschbach, J. Covalency in actinide(IV) hexachlorides in relation to the chlorine K-edge X-ray absorption structure. Chem. Sci.13, 3194–3207 (2022). 10.1039/D1SC06454A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thibaut, E., Boutique, J. P., Verbist, J. J., Levet, J. C. & Noel, H. Electronic structure of uranium halides and oxyhalides in the solid state. An X-ray photoelectron spectral study of bonding ionicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc.104, 5266–5273 (1982). 10.1021/ja00384a002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ilton, E. S. & Bagus, P. S. XPS determination of uranium oxidation states. Surf. Interface Anal.43, 1549–1560 (2011). 10.1002/sia.3836 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Neidig, M. L., Clark, D. L. & Martin, R. L. Covalency in f-element complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev.257, 394–406 (2013). 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Beekmeyer, R. & Kerridge, A. Assessing covalency in cerium and uranium hexachlorides: a correlated wavefunction and density functional theory study. Inorganics3, 482–499 (2015). 10.3390/inorganics3040482 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gianopoulos, C. G. et al. Bonding in uranium(V) hexafluoride based on the experimental electron density distribution measured at 20 K. Inorg. Chem.56, 1775–1778 (2017). 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tanti, J., Lincoln, M. & Kerridge, A. Decomposition of d- and f-shell contributions to uranium bonding from the quantum theory of atoms in molecules: application to uranium and uranyl halides. Inorganics6, 88 (2018).
- 34.Gibson, J. K. Bond dissociation energies reveal the participation of d electrons in f-element halide bonding. J. Phys. Chem. A126, 272–285 (2022). 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c09090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Butorin, S. M. et al. Chemical reduction of actinides probed by resonant inelastic X-ray scattering. Anal. Chem.85, 11196–11200 (2013). 10.1021/ac4020534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Booth, C. H. et al. Delocalization and occupancy effects of 5f orbitals in plutonium intermetallics using L3-edge resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.194, 57–65 (2014). 10.1016/j.elspec.2014.03.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kvashnina, K. O. et al. Sensitivity to actinide doping of uranium compounds by resonant inelastic X-ray scattering at uranium L 3 edge. Anal. Chem.87, 8772–8780 (2015). 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Butorin, S. M., Modin, A., Vegelius, J. R., Kvashnina, K. O. & Shuh, D. K. Probing chemical bonding in uranium dioxide by means of high-resolution X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C120, 29397–29404 (2016). 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09335 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ramanantoanina, H., Kuri, G., Daul, C. & Bertsch, J. Core electron excitations in U4+: modelling of the: N d105f2 → n d95f3 transitions with n = 3, 4 and 5 by ligand field tools and density functional theory. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.18, 19020–19031 (2016). 10.1039/C6CP01395C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Booth, C. H. et al. Probing 5f-state configurations in URu2Si2 with U L III -edge resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B94, 045121 (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.045121 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kvashnina, K. O., Walker, H. C., Magnani, N., Lander, G. H. & Caciuffo, R. Resonant X-ray spectroscopy of uranium intermetallics at the M 4, 5 edges of uranium. Phys. Rev. B95, 245103 (2017). 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.245103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Amidani, L. et al. Understanding the size effects on the electronic structure of ThO2 nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.21, 10635–10643 (2019). 10.1039/C9CP01283D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Butorin, S. M. 3d-4f resonant inelastic X-ray scattering of actinide dioxides: crystal-field multiplet description. Inorg. Chem.59, 16251–16264 (2020). 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Amidani, L. et al. Probing the local coordination of hexavalent uranium and the splitting of 5f orbitals induced by chemical bonding. Inorg. Chem.60, 16286–16293 (2021). 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bagus, P. S., Schacherl, B. & Vitova, T. Computational and spectroscopic tools for the detection of bond covalency in Pu(IV) materials. Inorg. Chem.60, 16090–16102 (2021). 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Polly, R., Schacherl, B., Rothe, J. & Vitova, T. Relativistic multiconfigurational Ab initio calculation of uranyl 3d4f resonant inelastic X-ray scattering. Inorg. Chem.60, 18764–18776 (2021). 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lander, G. H. et al. Resonant inelastic X-ray spectroscopy on UO 2 as a test case for actinide materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter33, 06LT01 (2021). 10.1088/1361-648X/abc4d2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Butorin, S. M. Advanced X-ray spectroscopy of actinide trichlorides. J. Chem. Phys.155, 164103 (2021). 10.1063/5.0062927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sergentu, D.-C. & Autschbach, J. X-ray absorption spectra of f-element complexes: insight from relativistic multiconfigurational wavefunction theory. Dalton Trans.51, 1754–1764 (2022). 10.1039/D1DT04075H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Marino, A. et al. Singlet magnetism in intermetallic UGa 2 unveiled by inelastic X-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. B108, 045142 (2023). 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.045142 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ehrman, J. N. et al. Unveiling hidden shake-up features in the uranyl M4-edge spectrum. JACS Au4, 1134–1141 (2024). 10.1021/jacsau.3c00838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Stanistreet-Welsh, K. & Kerridge, A. Bounding [AnO 2] 2+ (An = U, Np) covalency by simulated O K-edge and An M-edge X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 23753–23760 (2023). 10.1039/D3CP03149G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.de Groot, F. & Kotani, A. Core Level Spectroscopy of Solids. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2008).
- 54.Haverkort, M. W., Zwierzycki, M. & Andersen, O. K. Multiplet ligand-field theory using Wannier orbitals. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 85, 165113 (2012).
- 55.Koepernik, K. & Eschrig, H. Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme. Phys. Rev. B59, 1743–1757 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1743 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bader, R. F. W. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. 22 (Clarendon Press, 1994).
- 57.Kerridge, A. Quantification of f-element covalency through analysis of the electron density: insights from simulation. Chem. Commun.53, 6685–6695 (2017). 10.1039/C7CC00962C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Scheinost, A. C. et al. ROBL-II at ESRF: a synchrotron toolbox for actinide research. J. Synchrotron Radiat.28, 333–349 (2021). 10.1107/S1600577520014265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Retegan, M. Crispy: v0.7.4. 10.5281/zenodo.1008184%7D (2019).
- 60.Otero-de-la-Roza, A., Johnson, E. R. & Luaña, V. Critic2: A program for real-space analysis of quantum chemical interactions in solids. Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 1007–1018 (2014). 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Neese, F. Software update: the ORCA program system—version 5.0. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.12, e1606 (2022). 10.1002/wcms.1606 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Scheibe, B. et al. UF4 and the high-pressure polymorph HP-UF4. Chem. Eur. J.25, 7366–7374 (2019). 10.1002/chem.201900639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rudel, S. S. & Kraus, F. Facile syntheses of pure uranium halides: UCl 4, UBr 4 and UI 4. Dalton Trans.46, 5835–5842 (2017). 10.1039/C7DT00726D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rudel, S. S., Deubner, H. L., Scheibe, B., Conrad, M. & Kraus, F. Facile syntheses of pure uranium(III) halides: UF3, UCl3, UBr3, and UI3. Z. Für Anorg. Allg. Chem.644, 323–329 (2018). 10.1002/zaac.201700402 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Larson, A. C., Roof, R. B. & Cromer, D. T. The crystal structure of UF4. Acta Crystallogr. 17, 555–UF558 (1964). 10.1107/S0365110X64001293 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Taylor, J. C. & Wilson, P. W. Crystal structure of uranium tetrabromide by X-ray and neutron diffraction. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B30, 2664–2667 (1974). 10.1107/S0567740874007758 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Levy, J. H., Taylor, J. C. & Waugh, A. B. Crystal structure of uranium(IV) tetraiodide by X-ray and neutron diffraction. Inorg. Chem.19, 672–674 (1980). 10.1021/ic50205a019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schleid, T., Meyer, G. & Morss, L. R. Facile synthesis of UCl4 and ThCl4, metallothermic reductions of UCl4 with alkali metals and crystal structure refinements of UCl3, UCl4 and Cs2UCl6. J. Less Common Met.132, 69–77 (1987). 10.1016/0022-5088(87)90175-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Levy, J. H., Taylor, J. C. & Wilson, P. W. The structure of uranium tribromide by neutron diffraction profile analysis. J. Less Common Met. 39, 265–270 (1975). 10.1016/0022-5088(75)90200-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Murasik, A., Fischer, P. & Szczepaniak, W. Neutron diffraction study of long-range antiferromagnetic order and crystal structure of uranium (III) tri-iodide. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys.14, 1847 (1981). 10.1088/0022-3719/14/13/009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data generated in this study have been deposited in the Zenodo database under accession code 10.5281/zenodo.12706853.